Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0141098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141098

Reduced D2/D3 Receptor Binding of Extrastriatal and Striatal Regions in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Viviane E Bernedo Paredes 1,*, Hans-Georg Buchholz 2, Martin Gartenschläger 2,¤a, Markus Breimhorst 1,¤b, Mathias Schreckenberger 2,#, Konrad J Werhahn 1,¤c,#
Editor: Kenji Hashimoto3
PMCID: PMC4636381  PMID: 26544593

Abstract

Objective

Dopamine is an endogenous neuromodulator in cortical circuits and the basal ganglia. In animal models of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), seizure threshold is modulated to some extent by dopamine, with D1-receptors having a pro- and D2-receptors an anticonvulsant effect. We aimed to extend our previously reported results on decreased D2/D3 receptor binding in the lateral epileptogenic temporal lobe and to correlate them with demographic and seizure variables to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying involvement of the dopaminergic system in the epileptogenesis of TLE.

Methods

To quantify D2/D3 receptor binding, we studied 21 patients with TLE and hippocampal sclerosis (13 left- and eight right-sided) and 18 controls using PET with the high-affinity dopamine D2/D3-receptor ligand 18F-Fallypride to image striatal and extrastriatal binding. TLE was defined by interictal and ictal video-EEG, MRI and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Voxel-based statistical and regions-of-interest analyses were performed.

Results

18F-Fallypride binding potential was significantly reduced in the affected temporal lobe and bilateral putamen. A positive correlation between age at onset of epilepsy and [18F]FP BPnd (binding potential non-displaceable) in temporal regions on the epileptogenic side was found, as well as a negative correlation between epilepsy duration and [18F]FP BPnd in the temporal pole on the epileptogenic side and a positive correlation between the estimated number of lifetime GTCS and [18F]FP BPnd in the hippocampus on the epileptogenic side.

Significance

The areas of reduced D2/D3 receptor availability correspond to “the irritative zone” surrounding the epileptogenic area. Moreover, reduced D2/D3 receptor availability was detectable in the basal ganglia, which are suspected to be involved in a control circuit for epileptic seizures. The correlational analysis additionally suggests that increased epilepsy duration leads to increasing impairment of the dopaminergic system.

Introduction

The dopaminergic system in epilepsy has received much interest, especially in imaging and genetic studies, which have confirmed the role of dopamine-mediated neurotransmission (for review see Ref. [1]). A reduction of striatal dopamine uptake in [18F]-fluoro-L-Dopa-PET has been described in patients with ring chromosome 20 mosaicism epilepsy [2] and in drug-resistant focal and generalized epilepsies [3, 4]. Furthermore, reduced dopamine transporter binding has been reported for juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmentum [5, 6] and epilepsy with tonic-clonic seizures in the putamen [7], suggesting that dopaminergic alterations may be related to the pronounced motor manifestation of syndrome-related seizures. Further studies have focused on the role of the dopaminergic system within the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuitry and its assumed ability to control the propagation of seizures [8].

Alterations of D1- and D2-like receptors have been shown in different epilepsy syndromes. Reduced striatal D1-receptor binding has been shown in autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy [9]. D2/D3-receptor binding was reduced in the bilateral posterior putamen in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy [10], while in a limited number of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and hippocampal sclerosis reduced D2/D3-receptor binding was only present adjacent to the epileptogenic focus [11], indicating an alteration of the extrastriatal dopaminergic system.

In this study, we collected PET data for patients with TLE and hippocampal sclerosis and controls, employing the D2/D3 receptor ligand 18F-Fallypride to image striatal and extrastriatal D2/D3-receptor binding, and then performed voxel-based and regions-of-interest analyses on this data. We aimed to quantify D2/D3-receptor binding in order to further elucidate the role of these receptors in the pathophysiology of TLE and potentially to identify clinical and demographic influencing factors.

Materials and Methods

Patients and controls

The study was approved by the local ethical committee (Medical Association Rhineland-Palatinate) and national radiation safety authority (Federal Office for Radiation Protection) and patients gave written and informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. We studied 21 patients with TLE (n = 13/8 for left/right-sided temporal focus; mean age±SD, 38.9±2.9 years; clinical and demographic details in Tables 1 and 2) and 18 healthy male controls (mean age, 30.4±4.6 years; non-smokers; no history of drug abuse; no history or evidence of neurological or psychiatric disorders; no women were included for ethical reasons; normal structural MRIs; all right-handed). Four patients were included in our previous study [11]. Patient inclusion criteria were: (i) clinically documented history of drug-resistant mesial TLE; (ii) scalp video-EEG recording of at least two spontaneous seizures with ictal EEG seizure pattern from temporal regions; (iii) brain MRI performed no later than six months before or after PET investigations; and (iv) standard MRI criteria for hippocampal sclerosis (hippocampal atrophy, increased T2 signal and loss of internal hippocampal architecture).

Table 1. Demographic and clinical features of patients.

Demographic features TLE a all TLE left TLE right
Sex male/female 9/12 5/8 4/4
Lateralization left/right 13/8 13/0 0/8
Handedness left/right 3 b /18 1 b /12 2/6
Nicotine yes/no 4/17 2/11 2/6
Clinical features
Initial precipitating incidents
Febrile convulsions yes/no/unknown 8/9/4 5/6/2 3/3/2
Head injury yes/no 2/19 2/11 0/8
Epilepsy onset c age (years) 11.5±9.0 11.8±9.5 11.1±8.8
Epilepsy duration c years 27.6±16.5 23.2±13.9 34.6±18.9
Aura yes/no 18/3 11/2 7/1
Complex partial seizures yes/no 21/0 13/0 8/0
Secondarily generalized seizures yes/no 16/5 11/2 5/3
Ictal dystonia yes/no 8/13 5/8 3/5
Ictal version yes/no 5/16 3/10 2/6

a TLE = temporal lobe epilepsy

b one patient was relearned from left to right

c Clinical and demographic data did not differ between right and left TLE patients.

Table 2. Specific clinical characteristics of patients.

Patient No. Ictal EEG Interictal EEG FDG PET AED therapy Surgery Engel’s class
1 L temp (n = 3) 100% L temp Y LEV LTG Y Ia
2 L temp (n = 3) 52% L temp 48% R temp Y GBP LEV VPA Y Ib
3 L temp (n = 2) 100% L temp Y OXC LEV Y Ia
4 L temp (n = 7) 75% L temp 25% R temp Y CBZ LEV Y Ia
5 L temp (n = 3) 100% L temp N LEV TPM Y Ia
6 R temp (n = 2) 100% R temp Y LEV LTG Y Ib
7 R temp (n = 3) 95% R temp 5% L temp Y LEV LCM Y Ia
8 L temp (n = 4) 100% L temp Y LEV LTG Y Ia
9 L temp (n = 13) 98% L temp 2% R temp Y LEV Y Ia
10 R temp (n = 6) 100% R temp Y LCM N -
11 L temp (n = 2) 20% L temp 80% R temp Y LEV PGB N -
12 R temp (n = 6) 100% R temp Y LEV LCM Y Ia
13 R temp (n = 8) 73% R temp 24% L temp Y LEV LTG Y Ia
14 L temp (n = 3) 100% L temp Y LEV LCM Y Ia
15 L temp (n = 5) 47% L temp 53% R temp Y LTG TPM Y Ic
16 R temp (n = 4) 94% R temp 6% L temp Y LEV LCM N -
17 R temp (n = 2) 83% R temp 17% L temp Y LEV LTG Y Ia
18 L temp (n = 4) 100% L temp Y LEV Y Ia
19 L temp (n = 3) 100% L temp Y LEV PGB Y Id
20 R temp (n = 4) 100% R temp Y LEV LCM Y Ia
21 L temp (n = 8) 100% L temp Y LEV LCM Y Ia

FDG = Fluorodeoxyglucose, AED = Antiepileptic drugs, CBZ = Carbamazepine, GBP = Gabapentin, LCM = Lacosamide, LEV = Levetiracetam, LTG = Lamotrigine, OXC = Oxcarbazepine, PGB = Pregabalin, TPM = Topiramate, VPA = Valproic Acid, temp = temporal, L = Left, R = Right, Y = Yes, N = No.

EEG methods

EEG recordings were carried out using 32-channel surface plus sphenoidal electrodes (in 15 of 21 patients) placed according to the international 10–20 system. One patient was also studied with subdural grid electrodes. Interictal and ictal EEG activity was recorded separately to the PET scan, and lateralization to the left or right temporal lobe was based on congruent interictal and ictal data with at least two typical seizures in each case.

18F-Fallypride PET

After a 10 min transmission scan, a 180 min dynamic emission recording in 3D mode consisting of 39 frames, increasing in duration from 20 to 600 s, was initiated with the ECAT EXACT tomograph [12] (Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN, U.S.A.) upon intravenous bolus injection of 189.0±25.2 MBq and 184.8±23.6 MBq [18F]FP for patients and controls, respectively.

PET images were reconstructed using filtered back projection and Hamming filter (width: 4 mm) and corrected for scatter and attenuation. All dynamic PET recordings were transferred to a Sun Workstation (Sun Microsystems) for further data analysis using MPI tool (ATV Erfstadt, Germany). Although great care was taken to minimize head movement by a head holder, displacement was noted in some cases. Correction was realized under the condition of no head movement during the first 10 min. The emission recording summed over this time interval was manually resliced in the anterior–posterior commissure orientation. All subsequent emission frames were realigned to the consecutively corrected summed recording to optimize matching of the cerebral contours. The quality of the final alignment was assessed framewise by visual inspection and striatal time–radioactivity curves were extracted and evaluated for movement artefacts. The final dynamic emission recordings were summed. Parametric images of binding potential were obtained using the simplified reference tissue model [13]. The free and non-specific ligand kinetic is based on the time-activity curve of a cerebellar reference region assumed to be devoid of D2-/D3-specific binding [14]. Individual transaxial MRIs were co-registered with the corrected early summed emission recordings and parametric images of binding potential in the anterior-posterior commissure and bihippocampal orientations.

Regions of interest

50 hypothesis-controlled ROIs were drawn on the registered individual MRI and copied to the parametric binding potential images. Following Merlet et al. [15], ROIs were outlined anatomically following the grey matter ribbon. In the anterior-posterior commissure orientation, bilateral ROIs were drawn in the caudate nucleus (caput), anterior and posterior part of the putamen, thalamus (each drawn in three consecutive planes), and midbrain; and in the bihippocampal orientation, in the superior and middle temporal gyrus (as well as in their isolated leading parts), inferior temporal gyrus, temporal pole (in three consecutive planes), inferior parietal lobule (in two planes), parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampus. Calculated BPnd values for ROIs drawn in consecutive planes were averaged (Fig 1), yielding a total of 14 ROIs on each side. Due to the scanner-specific average axial resolution of 5.0 mm (center) to 8.1 mm (at a distance of 20 cm to the center; R = 20 cm) full width at half-maximum [12], no ROI was drawn separately in the substantia nigra, though it plays a pivotal role in the dopaminergic system.

Fig 1. Regions of interest for PET data analysis.

Fig 1

ROIs were outlined manually on patient and control MRIs. 1: caudate nucleus (caput); 2x: superior temporal gyrus (leading part); 2: superior temporal gyrus; 3: parahippocampal gyrus; 4: temporal pole; 5: inferior temporal gyrus; 6: putamen (a = anterior, b = posterior); 7: hippocampus; 8: thalamus; 9x: middle temporal gyrus (leading part); 9: middle temporal gyrus; 13: inferior parietal lobule. Not shown: midbrain and similar ROIs just drawn in consecutive planes. 30°: bihippocampal orientation; acpc: anterior-posterior commissure orientation.

To detect intraindividual differences in local receptor concentrations, the variation of BPnd for each ROI between affected and unaffected hemispheres was calculated by:

ΔBP= BPepileptogenicBPunaffectedBPunaffected×100

Voxel-wise statistical analysis

Voxel-wise statistical analysis was performed with SPM8 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8/). Integral images of the dynamics were spatially normalized using a ligand-specific template from 18F-Fallypride scans of healthy controls. The applied 18F-Fallypride template image for stereotactic normalization was taken from previous work [16]. Non-linear warping parameters were applied to the co-registered BPnd images. Integral images and BPnd images of all right-sided TLE patients were flipped to the left side. Normalized BPnd images were smoothed using a 12 × 12 × 12 mm3 full-width at half-maximum isotropic Gaussian kernel that accommodates interindividual anatomy variability [17].

18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET

FDG-PET was performed in 20 of 21 patients as a routine presurgical investigation following the guidelines for brain imaging [18] with an average FDG dose of 255.8±69.1 MBq. The FDG-PET data was included in this report to correlate any changes in brain metabolism with 18F-Fallypride binding. Only data acquired on the same scanner as that used for the 18F-Fallypride-PET (16 patients; 11/5 with left-/right-sided TLE) were used for the analysis. Image reconstruction was performed using filtered back projection and a Hamming filter. If no relevant head movement was observed, three 10-min frames were combined to a single image. FDG-PET was analyzed using NEUROSTAT and 3D standard surface projections.

FDG-PETs were not only visually analyzed for focal hypometabolism but also co-registered with parametric images of BPnd in the anterior-posterior commissure and bihippocampal orientations. ROIs were co-registered in the individual parametric images of BPnd and FDG-PET to check for a causal relationship between glucose metabolism and dopamine receptor concentration. The standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated as the ratio of the radioactivity concentration and the administered activity divided by the body weight.

Statistical analysis

For group comparisons, we performed two-sample t-tests between the TLE patients and the healthy male controls on voxel-wise basis using SPM8. Statistical parametric maps of positive and negative contrasts were calculated using a threshold of p<0.0001 uncorrected (equates to p<0.05 corrected at cluster level) and a minimal cluster size >20 voxels. As implemented in SPM8, one-way analyses of covariance were performed by entering the global BPnd (mean of all BPnd values within the brain mask in order to eliminate any unspecific 18F-Fallypride enrichment, e.g., in the mucus membranes) as a covariate. Additionally, in order to correct for multiple comparison, we used a small volume correction implemented in the SPM8 software. Therefore, we applied a binary mask (Fig 2) including all hypothesized-controlled selected regions already defined for ROI analysis. Coordinates of significant clusters were reported using MNI coordinates.

Fig 2. Binary mask for small volume correction.

Fig 2

18F-Fallypride template image for stereotactic normalization (A). Binary mask for small volume correction consisting of all hypotheses-controlled regions of interst equivalent to BPnd >0.35 (B) and overlay of 18F-Fallypride template image and binary mask (C).

For ROI analyses (in the whole group as well as in the left- and right-side affected patients), we tested possible differences between the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic side in [18F]FP BPnd and [18F]FDG SUV for each ROI using paired t-tests. ROI [18F]FP BPnd values between patients and controls were compared by one-way analyses of covariance, defining “group” (patients vs. controls) as a between-subject factor and global BPnd as a covariate with potential influence on [18F]FP BPnd. ROI [18F]FP BPnd values between patients with left-sided and those with right-sided TLE were compared by one-way analyses of covariance, defining “group” (patients with left-sided vs. patients with right-sided TLE) as a between-subject factor and global BPnd as a covariate with potential influence on [18F]FP BPnd. ROI-based linear relationships between regional [18F]FP BPnd and age at onset, epilepsy duration, estimated number of lifetime generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), seizure frequency and spike frequency on the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides were tested using partial correlation coefficient (two-sided) controlling for global BPnd. Normality of demographic/clinical data was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If necessary, data were log-transformed (estimated number of lifetime GTCS, seizure frequency and spike frequency) after adding a small constant to avoid zero values. Significant results were defined as p<0.05. All values are reported as mean±standard deviation (SD). All calculations were performed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, U.S.A.).

Results

Regional uptake of [18F]Fallypride

The voxel-wise statistical analysis of the group comparison with controls revealed a significantly reduced [18F]FP BPnd in the bilateral basal ganglia and the epileptogenic temporal lobe. As shown in Fig 3, [18F]FP BPnd was decreased in the anterior (x = -28, y = 12, z = -38; z = 6.03) and lateral sections, particularly within the anterior field of the superior (x = -42, y = 14, z = -24; z = 6,14) and inferior (x = -36, y = -12, z = -42; z = 5.40) temporal gyrus of the epileptogenic temporal lobe. By contrast, mesial temporal areas did not show any significant [18F]FP BPnd alteration. There was no significant [18F]FP BPnd alteration seen in the unaffected temporal lobe or in the reverse contrast of patients versus controls. The decreased [18F]FP uptake in the basal ganglia was observed in the bilateral putamen (x = -26, y = -18, z = 2; z = 4.37 on the epileptogenic and x = 36, y = -18, z = -4; z = 4.69 on the non-epileptogenic side).

Fig 3. Statistical parametric mapping results.

Fig 3

Statistical parametric mapping results (contrast controls–patients). Glass brain of the statistical map (top) and superposition of statistical maps onto an averaged MRI (bottom). The statistical threshold is p<0.0001 uncorrected (equates to p<0.05 corrected at cluster level). (Yellow color indicates decrease in [18F]FP BPnd in patients).

ROI-based comparison of the control and patient groups confirmed these results (S1 Table). [18F]FP BPnd was significantly reduced in the temporal pole (0.79±0.15 vs. 0.44±0.15; p<0.001) and superior temporal gyrus (0.59±0.15 vs. 0.44±0.15; p = 0.007) as well as in the inferior temporal gyrus (0.64±0.18 vs. 0.43±0.18; p<0.001) and middle temporal gyrus (0.52±0.16 vs. 0.40±0.16; p = 0.03) on the epileptogenic side. There was a significant reduction in [18F]FP BPnd in the bilateral putamen. No significant difference was detectable between the affected and unaffected sides. However, the decrease in [18F]FP BPnd was more prominent in the putamen ipsilateral to the epileptogenic focus since it showed a global BPnd decrease in the anterior (19.49±2.22 vs. 17.48±2.21; p = 0.010) and posterior (19.02±2.24 vs. 17.49±2.23; p = 0.05) parts, while the contralateral putamen showed a decrease in [18F]FP uptake only in the posterior part (19.63±2.19 vs. 17.66±2.18; p = 0.01).

ROI-based intraindividual comparison of the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides showed a more pronounced reduction of cortical [18F]FP binding on the epileptogenic side compared to the ROI-based quantification to the control group (Fig 4, S2 Table).

Fig 4. Mean relative [18F]FP binding potential and FDG uptake.

Fig 4

Mean relative [18F]FP binding potential and FDG uptake in percent (±standard deviation) for patients with TLE (n = 16) given by ((BPnd affected side—BPnd unaffected side) / BPnd unaffected side)*100 and (FDG uptake (SUV) affected side—FDG uptake (SUV) unaffected side) / FDG uptake (SUV) unaffected side)*100), respectively. Statistical differences refer to the comparison between affected and unaffected sides separately for each tracer (***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05).

[18F]Fallypride uptake according to the side of onset of epileptogenic activity

ROI-based comparison of left-sided and right-sided TLE patients showed an isolated and significant reduction in [18F]FP BPnd in the superior temporal gyrus (0.63±0.20 vs. 0.28±0.22; p = 0.04) and anterior part of the superior temporal gyrus (0.69±0.22 vs. 0.31±0.22 p = 0.04) in patients with right-sided TLE. ROI-based intraindividual comparison of the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides (data not shown) confirmed the results from the interindividual comparison. Moreover, relative to the non-epileptogenic side, patients with right-sided TLE exhibited a significant decrease in [18F]FP BPnd in the thalamus on the epileptogenic side (1.69±0.43 vs. 1.93±0.44; p = 0.03), whereas in patients with left-sided TLE, there was a significant increase in [18F]FP BPnd in the hippocampus on the epileptogenic side (0.94±0.21 vs. 0.84±0.20; p = 0.04).

Regional uptake of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose

ROI-based intraindividual comparison of the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides showed a decrease in [18F]FDG uptake (SUV), particularly in the hippocampus (3.79±0.94 vs. 4.22±1.02; p<0.001) and temporal pole (3.39±0.93 vs. 3.98±1.06; p<0.001), but also in the entire temporal lobe on the epileptogenic side, including the mesial and lateral aspects, with the exception of the superior temporal gyrus. In addition, the inferior parietal lobule (4.85±1.20 vs. 5.19±1.17; p = 0.01) dorsally following the temporal regions on the epileptogenic side showed a hypometabolism (Fig 4). No correlation was found between this hypometabolism and the decrease in [18F]FP BPnd.

ROI-based comparison of left- and right-sided TLE showed no significant alteration in [18F]FDG uptake (SUV).

Correlation of [18F]FP BPnd with clinical data

There was a positive correlation between the age at onset of epilepsy and [18F]FP BPnd, which involved solely temporal regions (inferior temporal gyrus: r = 0.46, p = 0.04; middle temporal gyrus anterior part: r = 0.50, p<0.03 and the temporal pole: r = 0.72, p<0.001) on the epileptogenic side. Furthermore, a negative correlation was detected between epilepsy duration and [18F]FP BPnd in the temporal pole on the epileptogenic side (r = -0.39, p = 0.05). There was a positive correlation between the estimated number of lifetime GTCS and [18F]FP BPnd in the hippocampus on the epileptogenic side (r = 0.47, p = 0.04). No correlation to [18F]FP BPnd was observed for either seizure frequency or spike frequency.

Discussion

Our study showed extensive reductions in D2 receptor availability in vivo in patients with TLE in brain areas ipsilateral to the epileptogenic focus consistent with previous preliminary findings [11]. In addition to confirming these findings in a larger and independent cohort, the study extends previous results, showing a decrease in [18F]Fallypride binding in extrastriatal and striatal brain areas afferent to the epileptogenic zone.

The detection of a bilateral decrease in [18F]FP BPnd in the putamen is consistent with the presumed role of the dopaminergic system within the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuitry, since the dorsal striatum (i.e., caudate and putamen) is considered a key structure in the control of epileptic seizure spread [8, 1923]. This dopaminergic influence is thought to be differentially mediated by D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. Activation of the D2-mediated inhibitory pathway leads to an inhibition of the target areas within the thalamus and thereby to a reduced excitability of afferent cortical areas [24]. Assuming a high level of dopamine in epilepsy [25, 26] as a consequence of cortical hyperexcitability leading to a tonic release of dopamine [26], increased D2-mediated activation might serve to limit the spread of epileptic activity. This is in line with experimental data in rodents that show that pharmacological stimulation of D2-receptors in the striatum has a protective effect on pilocarpine-induced convulsions [21]. Results in patients with idiopathic generalized (genetic) epilepsy (juvenile myoclonic epilepsy) showing a decrease in [18F]FP BPnd specifically in the bilateral posterior putamen [10] and also the detection of reduced [18F]FP BPnd in the bilateral anterior caudate-putamen in pilocarpine-treated rats [27] seem to lend further support to the control of seizure spread through basal ganglia mechanisms. Our findings in patients with TLE might reflect increased activity of the glutamatergic corticofugal fibers due to cortical hyperexcitability leading to an increasing tonic release of dopamine and thereby downregulation of dopamine receptors [26].

If alterations of the dopaminergic system in patients with epilepsy are cause or consequence of seizures and epilepsy remains controversial and cannot be answered with the present study. However, arguments can be brought up for alterations being a consequence rather than the cause. In our study, a positive correlation between the age at onset of epilepsy and [18F]FP BPnd was detected in the temporal lobe on the epileptogenic side. Furthermore, D2/D3-receptor binding negatively correlated with epilepsy duration in the temporal pole on the epileptogenic side. This is in line with the study of Rocha et al. [28] evaluating the expression and binding of dopamine receptors in cerebral cortex samples. The observation of unaffected D2-receptor protein expression in patients with TLE secondary to brain tumor or lesion is therefore explained by a longer duration of epilepsy and younger age at onset in patients with TLE due to hippocampal sclerosis. It was hypothesized that an increased duration of epilepsy and its assumed association with a progressive involvement of the adjacent cortical areas in the epileptogenic zone [28] leads to an increasing impairment of the dopaminergic system.

While dopamine D2 receptor availability was reduced in basal ganglia we found a relative increase of [18F]FP BPnd in hippocampus ipsilateral to the epileptogenic focus pointing to a different pathophysiological role of D2-mediated dopaminergic influence in this area, which deserves discussion. There is evidence that the dopaminergic system plays a pivotal role in neurotoxicity and neuroprotection, with several studies indicating a D2 receptor-mediated neuroprotection (for review see Ref. [29]). With regard to further elucidating hippocampal cell death in epilepsy, the well characterized kainic acid model was used by Bozzi et al. [30] to show that in D2 receptor knock-out mice, but not in wild type mice, kainic acid-induced limbic seizures result in extensive hippocampal cell death by apoptosis. Interestingly, while Seidenberg et al. [31] showed that hippocampal volume decreases with increasing duration of epilepsy and moreover was negatively correlated to the estimated number of lifetime generalized seizures, our data show a significant increase in [18F]FP BPnd in the hippocampus on the epileptogenic side compared to the non-epileptogenic side in patients with left-sided TLE. With regard to the assumed D2 receptor-mediated neuroprotection in the hippocampus, our results might be explained by an increased need for neuroprotection, and therefore, upregulation of D2 receptors in mesial temporal areas. This assumption is further supported by the observation of a positive correlation between the estimated number of lifetime GTCS (as a marker for severity of epilepsy) and [18F]FP BPnd in the hippocampus on the epileptogenic side in TLE patients in our study. Additionally, several in vivo studies have shown that dopamine exerts an inhibitory influence on epileptogenesis in the hippocampus. Stereotactic microinjection studies with focal intrahippocampal injections of selective dopamine-receptor agonists and antagonists have shown this is due to dopamine D2 receptors (for review see Ref. [32]). Therefore, our results may also suggest a consecutive increase in dopamine D2-receptor availability in the hippocampus as a consequence of altered epileptic discharges and thus be preventative against evolving epileptic discharges.

Whether an isolated significant intraindividual increase in [18F]FP BPnd in the hippocampus on the epileptogenic side in left-sided TLE patients in our study is epileptic-onset-side dependent or due to the small sample volume requires further study with a larger cohort. Nevertheless, a quantitative volumetric comparison of left- and right-sided TLE patients in patients with unilateral TLE [31] showed more widespread and pronounced white-matter volume loss in patients with right-sided TLE and thus agrees with our results showing a significantly reduced [18F]FP BPnd in the superior temporal and anterior part of the superior temporal gyrus in right-sided compared to left-sided TLE patients.

Our study has several limitations. Due to the method employed and the missing autoradiographic studies on resected tissue, the explanatory power of this study has limitations in terms of whether the decrease in dopamine D2/D3-receptor availability is due to dopamine-receptor downregulation or increased dopamine occupancy leading to competitive displacement of [18F]FP. Recently, Rocha et al. [28] investigated the protein expression and binding of both D1 and D2 receptors in neocortex samples from 12 surgically treated TLE patients due to HCS. As compared to six control samples, using autopsy material, elevated D1-receptor protein expression and binding and reduced D2-receptor protein expression was verifiable in the neocortex of TLE patients. These results support dopamine-receptor downregulation as the cause of decreased [18F]FP BPnd shown here. Contradictorily, in the same study, D2-receptor binding in the neocortex, measured by autoradiography using [3H]Raclopride, was unaffected in TLE patients compared to controls. This discrepancy might be explained by the known difference in the affinities of [18F]Fallypride and [3H]Raclopride to D2/D3 receptors as [3H]Raclopride, as a so called moderate-affinity PET tracer, is rather unsuitable for detection of extrastriatal binding [14].

The possible relationship between the dopaminergic neurotransmission involvement and morphological changes in TLE—as another possible explanation for the decrease in dopamine D2/D3-receptor availability shown in our study—was addressed by Bouilleret et al. [4]. The presynaptic dopaminergic influx was studied using [18F]-fluoro-L-Dopa-PET, glucose metabolism by using [18F]FDG-PET and morphologic cerebral changes by using voxel-based morphometry. While reduced [18F]-fluoro-L-dopa uptake was seen in the bilateral caudate, putamen and in the substantia nigra, no metabolic alterations and only mild gray matter volume reduction were observed in striatal regions without any changes in the substantia nigra. The authors reason that these discrepancies are indicative of the basal ganglia dopaminergic neurotransmission involvement not being related to structural subcortical abnormalities. To exclude metabolic alterations as cause for the dopamine receptor alterations shown in our study, we also performed [18F]FDG-PET and, comparable to the results of Bouilleret et al. [4], no correlation was found between FDG hypometabolism and decrease in [18F]FP BPnd.

As another possible limitation it should be mentioned, that although healthy controls and patients did not statistically differ due to their age, there was a trend toward an older age in the patient group, while age has already been shown to have a negative correlation with D2-receptor availability [33, 34] and might therefore have influenced our results. Additionally, due to known influence of gender and smoking behavior on D2-receptor availability [35], the solely non-smoking male control group might also have affected the results. It must be mentioned that all of these studies solely considered the basal ganglia, so that there is no evidence for extrastriatal structures.

Perspectively, a longitudinal [18F]FP-PET study of patients before and after epilepsy surgery to evaluate the reversibility of alterations in the dopaminergic system might be illuminative. Furthermore, to bridge the gap between electrophysiological data in rodents and our imaging study in humans, it might be useful to investigate an animal model of mesial TLE with classic hippocampal sclerosis by [18F]FP [36] and autoradiography.

For clinical practice, [18F]FP-PET might provide added value in the presurgical lateralization of MRI-negative TLE, where the reported degree as well as localization of [18F]FDG-PET hypometabolism and therefore its lateralizing value in MRI-negative TLE varies widely [37, 38]. Therefore, the lack of evidence for a structural lesion goes along with an increased risk of seizure recurrence after surgery [39], so that a better localizational tool such as [18F]FP-PET might improve the postsurgical outcome and hence should be investigated in a further study.

In summary, the areas of reduced D2/D3-receptor availability correspond to “the irritative zone” surrounding the epileptogenic onset, as well as to the basal ganglia which are suspected to be involved in a control circuit for epileptic seizures. Correlational results additionally suggest that increased duration of epilepsy leads to increasing impairment of the dopaminergic system.

Supporting Information

S1 Dataset. [18F]FP BPnd ROI original data of the patient group.

18F-Fallypride binding potential scores for regions of interest on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides for all patients. The regions of interest are denoted as described in Fig 1.

(XLS)

S2 Dataset. [18F]FP BPnd ROI original data of the control group.

18F-Fallypride binding potential scores for bilateral regions of interest for all controls. The regions of interest are denoted as described in Fig 1.

(XLS)

S3 Dataset. [18F]FDG and [18F]FDG SUV ROI original data of the patient group.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose scores and its standardized uptake value for regions of interest on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides for all patients. The regions of interest are denoted as described in Fig 1.

(XLS)

S4 Dataset. Clinical features for all patients.

(XLS)

S1 Table. [18F]FP BPnd ROI-based comparison of the control and patient groups.

18F-Fallypride binding potential mean scores (± standard deviation) and statistics for regions of interest on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides of all patients compared to controls.

(DOC)

S2 Table. [18F]FP BPnd ROI-based comparison of the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides.

18F-Fallypride binding potential mean scores (± standard deviation) and statistics for regions of interest on epileptogenic side compared to non-epileptogenic side of all patients.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank our technician Mr. Tiemo Geissert for assistance and Mr. Stefan Maus for radiopharmaceutical preparation and metabolite analysis. We also thank Dr. Darragh O’Neill for proofreading the manuscript.

Data Availability

Some restrictions will apply to the original PET images, as this data cannot be shared outside of our clinic due to patient privacy restrictions. All important data are listed in the paper and its Supporting Information files. PET-images will be made available to interested readers upon request. Requests can be made to the corresponding author (bernedo@uni-mainz.de).

Funding Statement

The experiments were supported by a scientific grant of the H.W. & J. Hector Foundation (URL:http://www.hector-stiftung.de/), Mannheim (Medizinprojekt M46). MS and KJW received the funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Bozzi Y, Borrelli E. The role of dopamine signaling in epileptogenesis. Front Cell Neurosci. 2013;7:157 10.3389/fncel.2013.00157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Biraben A, Semah F, Ribeiro MJ, Douaud G, Remy P, Depaulis A. PET evidence for a role of the basal ganglia in patients with ring chromosome 20 epilepsy. Neurology. 2004;63(1):73–7. Epub 2004/07/14. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bouilleret V, Semah F, Biraben A, Taussig D, Chassoux F, Syrota A, et al. Involvement of the basal ganglia in refractory epilepsy: an 18F-fluoro-L-DOPA PET study using 2 methods of analysis. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(3):540–7. Epub 2005/03/08. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bouilleret V, Semah F, Chassoux F, Mantzaridez M, Biraben A, Trebossen R, et al. Basal ganglia involvement in temporal lobe epilepsy: a functional and morphologic study. Neurology. 2008;70(3):177–84. Epub 2008/01/16. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000297514.47695.48 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ciumas C, Wahlin TB, Jucaite A, Lindstrom P, Halldin C, Savic I. Reduced dopamine transporter binding in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Neurology. 2008;71(11):788–94. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316120.70504.d5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Odano I, Varrone A, Savic I, Ciumas C, Karlsson P, Jucaite A, et al. Quantitative PET analyses of regional [11C]PE2I binding to the dopamine transporter—application to juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3582–93. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.067 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ciumas C, Wahlin TB, Espino C, Savic I. The dopamine system in idiopathic generalized epilepsies: identification of syndrome-related changes. Neuroimage. 2010;51(2):606–15. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.051 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Deransart C, Depaulis A. The control of seizures by the basal ganglia? A review of experimental data. Epileptic Disord. 2002;4 Suppl 3:S61–72. Epub 2002/12/24. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fedi M, Berkovic SF, Scheffer IE, O'Keefe G, Marini C, Mulligan R, et al. Reduced striatal D1 receptor binding in autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2008;71(11):795–8. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316192.52731.77 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Landvogt C, Buchholz HG, Bernedo V, Schreckenberger M, Werhahn KJ. Alteration of dopamine D2/D3 receptor binding in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51(9):1699–706. Epub 2010/04/14. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02569.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Werhahn KJ, Landvogt C, Klimpe S, Buchholz HG, Yakushev I, Siessmeier T, et al. Decreased dopamine D2/D3-receptor binding in temporal lobe epilepsy: an [18F]fallypride PET study. Epilepsia. 2006;47(8):1392–6. Epub 2006/08/23. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00561.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wienhard K, Eriksson L, Grootoonk S, Casey M, Pietrzyk U, Heiss WD. Performance evaluation of the positron scanner ECAT EXACT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16(5):804–13. Epub 1992/09/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage. 1996;4(3 Pt 1):153–8. Epub 1996/12/01. 10.1006/nimg.1996.0066 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Siessmeier T, Zhou Y, Buchholz HG, Landvogt C, Vernaleken I, Piel M, et al. Parametric mapping of binding in human brain of D2 receptor ligands of different affinities. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(6):964–72. Epub 2005/06/07. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Merlet I, Ostrowsky K, Costes N, Ryvlin P, Isnard J, Faillenot I, et al. 5-HT1A receptor binding and intracerebral activity in temporal lobe epilepsy: an [18F]MPPF-PET study. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 4):900–13. Epub 2004/02/27. 10.1093/brain/awh109 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Fehr C, Yakushev I, Hohmann N, Buchholz HG, Landvogt C, Deckers H, et al. Association of low striatal dopamine d2 receptor availability with nicotine dependence similar to that seen with other drugs of abuse. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(4):507–14. Epub 2008/03/05. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07020352 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ashburner J, Friston K. Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning—a unified framework. Neuroimage. 1997;6(3):209–17. Epub 1997/11/05. 10.1006/nimg.1997.0290 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bartenstein P, Asenbaum S, Catafau A, Halldin C, Pilowski L, Pupi A, et al. European Association of Nuclear Medicine procedure guidelines for brain imaging using [(18)F]FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29(10):BP43–8. Epub 2002/11/19. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wahnschaffe U, Loscher W. Anticonvulsant effects of ipsilateral but not contralateral microinjections of the dopamine D2 agonist LY 171555 into the nucleus accumbens of amygdala-kindled rats. Brain Res. 1991;553(2):181–7. Epub 1991/07/12. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Csernansky JG, Mellentin J, Beauclair L, Lombrozo L. Mesolimbic dopaminergic supersensitivity following electrical kindling of the amygdala. Biol Psychiatry. 1988;23(3):285–94. Epub 1988/02/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Al-Tajir G, Starr MS. D-2 agonists protect rodents against pilocarpine-induced convulsions by stimulating D-2 receptors in the striatum, but not in the substantia nigra. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1991;39(1):109–13. Epub 1991/05/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Al-Tajir G, Starr MS. Anticonvulsant effect of striatal dopamine D2 receptor stimulation: dependence on cortical circuits? Neuroscience. 1991;43(1):51–7. Epub 1991/01/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Turski L, Cavalheiro EA, Bortolotto ZA, Ikonomidou-Turski C, Kleinrok Z, Turski WA. Dopamine-sensitive anticonvulsant site in the rat striatum. J Neurosci. 1988;8(11):4027–37. Epub 1988/11/01. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Gerfen CR, Engber TM, Mahan LC, Susel Z, Chase TN, Monsma FJ Jr., et al. D1 and D2 dopamine receptor-regulated gene expression of striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons. Science. 1990;250(4986):1429–32. Epub 1990/12/07. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Adamec RE. Does kindling model anything clinically relevant? Biol Psychiatry. 1990;27(3):249–79. Epub 1990/02/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ring HA, Trimble MR, Costa DC, Moriarty J, Verhoeff NP, Ell PJ. Striatal dopamine receptor binding in epileptic psychoses. Biol Psychiatry. 1994;35(6):375–80. Epub 1994/03/15. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Yakushev IY, Dupont E, Buchholz HG, Tillmanns J, Debus F, Cumming P, et al. In vivo imaging of dopamine receptors in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51(3):415–22. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02272.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rocha L, Alonso-Vanegas M, Villeda-Hernandez J, Mujica M, Cisneros-Franco JM, Lopez-Gomez M, et al. Dopamine abnormalities in the neocortex of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;45(1):499–507. 10.1016/j.nbd.2011.09.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bozzi Y, Borrelli E. Dopamine in neurotoxicity and neuroprotection: what do D2 receptors have to do with it? Trends Neurosci. 2006;29(3):167–74. Epub 2006/01/31. 10.1016/j.tins.2006.01.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Bozzi Y, Vallone D, Borrelli E. Neuroprotective role of dopamine against hippocampal cell death. J Neurosci. 2000;20(22):8643–9. Epub 2000/11/09. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Seidenberg M, Kelly KG, Parrish J, Geary E, Dow C, Rutecki P, et al. Ipsilateral and contralateral MRI volumetric abnormalities in chronic unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy and their clinical correlates. Epilepsia. 2005;46(3):420–30. Epub 2005/02/26. 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.27004.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Starr MS. The role of dopamine in epilepsy. Synapse. 1996;22(2):159–94. Epub 1996/02/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kim JH, Son YD, Kim HK, Lee SY, Cho SE, Kim YB, et al. Effects of age on dopamine D2 receptor availability in striatal subdivisions: a high-resolution positron emission tomography study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21(12):885–91. Epub 2011/04/23. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.03.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wong DF, Broussolle EP, Wand G, Villemagne V, Dannals RF, Links JM, et al. In vivo measurement of dopamine receptors in human brain by positron emission tomography. Age and sex differences. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;515:203–14. Epub 1988/01/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Brown AK, Mandelkern MA, Farahi J, Robertson C, Ghahremani DG, Sumerel B, et al. Sex differences in striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptor availability in smokers and non-smokers. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;15(7):989–94. Epub 2012/01/17. 10.1017/s1461145711001957 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4113216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Norwood BA, Bumanglag AV, Osculati F, Sbarbati A, Marzola P, Nicolato E, et al. Classic hippocampal sclerosis and hippocampal-onset epilepsy produced by a single "cryptic" episode of focal hippocampal excitation in awake rats. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518(16):3381–407. Epub 2010/06/25. 10.1002/cne.22406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Carne RP, O'Brien TJ, Kilpatrick CJ, MacGregor LR, Hicks RJ, Murphy MA, et al. MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 10):2276–85. Epub 2004/07/30. 10.1093/brain/awh257 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Willmann O, Wennberg R, May T, Woermann FG, Pohlmann-Eden B. The contribution of 18F-FDG PET in preoperative epilepsy surgery evaluation for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy A meta-analysis. Seizure. 2007;16(6):509–20. Epub 2007/05/29. 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.04.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. McIntosh AM, Kalnins RM, Mitchell LA, Fabinyi GC, Briellmann RS, Berkovic SF. Temporal lobectomy: long-term seizure outcome, late recurrence and risks for seizure recurrence. Brain. 2004;127(Pt 9):2018–30 Epub 2004/06/25. 10.1093/brain/awh221 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Dataset. [18F]FP BPnd ROI original data of the patient group.

18F-Fallypride binding potential scores for regions of interest on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides for all patients. The regions of interest are denoted as described in Fig 1.

(XLS)

S2 Dataset. [18F]FP BPnd ROI original data of the control group.

18F-Fallypride binding potential scores for bilateral regions of interest for all controls. The regions of interest are denoted as described in Fig 1.

(XLS)

S3 Dataset. [18F]FDG and [18F]FDG SUV ROI original data of the patient group.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose scores and its standardized uptake value for regions of interest on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides for all patients. The regions of interest are denoted as described in Fig 1.

(XLS)

S4 Dataset. Clinical features for all patients.

(XLS)

S1 Table. [18F]FP BPnd ROI-based comparison of the control and patient groups.

18F-Fallypride binding potential mean scores (± standard deviation) and statistics for regions of interest on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides of all patients compared to controls.

(DOC)

S2 Table. [18F]FP BPnd ROI-based comparison of the epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic sides.

18F-Fallypride binding potential mean scores (± standard deviation) and statistics for regions of interest on epileptogenic side compared to non-epileptogenic side of all patients.

(DOC)

Data Availability Statement

Some restrictions will apply to the original PET images, as this data cannot be shared outside of our clinic due to patient privacy restrictions. All important data are listed in the paper and its Supporting Information files. PET-images will be made available to interested readers upon request. Requests can be made to the corresponding author (bernedo@uni-mainz.de).


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES