Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2015 Sep 1;8(9):11192–11198.

Metastatic and prognostic factors in patients with alveolar echinococcosis

Hui Wang 1, Chang Lu 1, Xia Liu 1, Wei Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC4637656  PMID: 26617841

Abstract

Background: Prognostic predictions in alveolar echinococcosis (AE) are usually based on relapse and metastasis. Thus, assessment of factors associated with metastasis and clinical outcomes in patients with alveolar echinococcosis are of significant important. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlated factors for metastasis and prognosis for patients with AE. Methods: We analyzed 159 AE patients who underwent curative surgery at the First Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from February 2003 to December 2013 by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for CD44 was performed in 159 AE and adjacent normal liver specimens. The clinicopathological parameters were analyzed for metastasis and prognosis, including gender, age, size, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granuloma and CD44 protein level. Results: The rate of metastasis was 22.1%. Chi-square test showed that low levels of CD44 was associated with metastasis (P = 0.004). However, multivariate analysis suggested that CD44 expression is not independent prognostic indicators for overall survival (P = 0.356). In addition, no correlations between prognosis and gender, age, size, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granulomatous, metastasis were identified. Conclusions: The finding that a low level of CD44 is associated with metastasis in AE patients. At present, it thus remains question whether CD44 expression is a valid prognostic marker for AE, further investigations are required.

Keywords: CD44, metastasis, prognosis, alveolar echinococcosis

Introduction

Alveolar echinococcosis disease spreading in the majority of the northern hemisphere [1] has a considerable impact on major public health in rural communities. Recent studies in China have shown that E. multilocularis is frequently detected including Xinjiang, Ningxia, Tibet autonomous regions, Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan and Inner Mongolia [2,3]. Infected dogs and foxes may act as the principal definitive hosts. The parasite is transmitted to humans occurs when eggs are ingested accidentally [4]. So, herdsmen and hunter are higher risk populations. AE is one of the most lethal parasitic diseases with a high fatality rate and poor prognosis in the absence of appropriate treatment [5]. The identification of prognostic factors is essential for predicting patients’ survival and determining optimal therapeutic strategies.

Contrast to cystic echinococcosis (CE), AE is characterized by a tumor-like growth of the E. multilocularis metacestode, spreading aggressively in the liver, producing large irregular masses. Patients with AE had rapid disease progression, and recurrence and metastasis ratio was high even after surgery. For AE, metastasis more likely occurs on lung and brain around the world [6]. However, the metastasis may be seen in any organ or tissue. Animal experiment showed that this metastatic disease can through the detached proliferated bud, even very small or only a few nuclei entering the blood vessels [7]. Metastasis continues to be a major clinical challenge in the treatment of AE. Thus, identifying a sensitive and representative biological marker is extremely important for diagnosis and evaluating prognosis.

Recently, more and more studies gradually reveal that dysregulation of the CD44 plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of many human malignancies [8,9]. CD44 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that was first found in lymphocytes and macrophages [10]. Increasing evidences have shown that CD44 is involved in the regulations of tumor cell migration, cell adhesion, tumor progression [11,12]. Low levels of CD44 in colorectal cancer correlate with increased lymph node invasion ability [13]. To date, there have been limited studies of CD44 in AE patients, and the significance of CD44 in the metastatic AE remains unclear. Thus, this study was aimed to the correlated factors for metastasis and prognosis in patients with AE.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue specimens

For the retrospective study, AE specimens were obtained from 159 patients at the first teaching hospital of Xinjiang medical university from February 2003 to December 2013. In all 159 cases, the liver was the primary location of AE. A total of 35 cases with associated distant (brain, lymph node, pulmonary, multiple organs) metastasis were identified. The patients’ pathologic features of the primary alveolar echinococcosis were recorded, including age, size, gender, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granulomatous, recur, metastasis, survival status. Following hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, all sections were reviewed and reexamined. Patient survival time was determined from the date of surgery until death or the last follow-up examination. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Immunohistochemical staining

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to study CD44 protein expression in 35 metastatic and 124 non-metastatic AE tissues. The immunohistochemical method was performed as previously described [14]. In brief, paraffin-embedded specimens were cut into 3 μm sections and incubated at 60°C for 60 min. The sections were deparaffinized with xylenes and rehydrated. For antigen retrieval, the section was heated in 10 mM citrate buffer PH 6 in a microwave oven 20 minutes. The sections were incubated with primary antibody at 4°C for overnight. The dilutions used for the primary antibodies were 1:200 for CD44 (Abcam). After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the sections were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used to visualize positive regions, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.

Evaluation of immnunostaining

Quantification of immunostaining was reviewed and scored by two independent pathologists based on the intensity of staining who were unaware of the clinical and pathologic data. In cases of discrepancy, a consensus score was chosen for evaluation. Staining intensity was graded according to the following criteria: 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining = light yellow), 2 (moderate staining = yellowish brown), and 3 (strong staining = brown). Strong staining was used to define AE with high CD44 protein expression, and no, weak and moderate stains were used to indicate low CD44 protein expression.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was performed with the statistical software program SPSS14.0. The relationship between metastasis, clinicopathological parameters, and immunohistochemical staining intensity was tested using chi-square test. Relative risks of related death associated with CD44 expression and other predictor variables were estimated by multivariate analyses. Differences were considered significant when P value was <0.05.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

The characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up time was 42 months (range 3 to 252 months). The patients include 78 men and 81 women with a median age of 39 years (range 14 to 69 years). 121 patients (76.1%) were under 50 years of age.

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients

Characteristics and finding N = 159
Median age, years (range) 39 (14-69)
Median size, cm (range) 11.79 (2-30)
Gender
    Male 78 (48.8%)
    Female 81 (50.6%)
Calcification
    Present 107 (67.3%)
    Absent 52 (32.7%)
Necrosis
    Present 115 (72.4%)
    Absent 44 (27.6)
Foreign body granulomatous
    Present 74 (46.6%)
    Absent 85 (53.4%)
Relapse
    Present 39 (24.4%)
    Absent 120 (75.6)
Metastasis
    Present 35 (22.1%)
    Absent 124 (77.9%)
Survival
    Alive 144 (90.6%)
    Deceased 15 (9.4%)

Figure 1 shows representative findings of a HE study for AE. The majority of patients had calcification (107 patients, 67.3%), had necrosis (115 patients, 72.4%), had foreign body granulomatous (74 patients, 46.6%), had foam cell (3 patients, 1.9%), and had new vessels (2 patients, 1.2%). The reason for calcification was slowly clinical progress. The period between exposure and the appearance of symptoms may be as long as several to dozen or more years [15].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Histologic patterns seen with AE. HE staining clearly shows the protoscolices (A), necrosis (B), calcification (C), foreign body granuloma (D), foam cell (E), new vessels(F), bar = 200 µm.

During the observation period, 35 of the 159 patients (22.1%) developed metastatic disease (multiple organs in 8, cerebral in 7, lymph node in 5, pulmonary in 5, vein in 3, gallbladder in 3 heart in 1, lumber vertebra in 1, thoracic vertebra in 1 adrenal gland in 1 ), respectively (Figure 2). With regard to organ distribution, approximately 23% (8/35) of the patients developed metastasis in more than one organ system.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of metastatic AE.

Expression of CD44 in AE patients

In the normal liver specimens, immunohistochemistry showed that CD44 was predominantly localized in liver portal lymphocytes, Kupffer cell and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells (Figure 3A). The expression of CD44 was immunohistochemically positive in the laminated layer of E. multilocularis, lymphocytes, and histiocyte in AE (Figure 3B). Out of 159 patients, there were 83 cases that exhibited a high expression level of CD44 (52.2%), and 76 cases (47.8%) that exhibited a low expression level of CD44.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative immunohistochemical images of CD44 marker. (A) CD44 expression in adjacent normal liver, (B) strong positive expression of CD44 in AE tissues, (C) negative CD44 expression in AE tissues, bar = 200 µm.

Correlation between metastasis and clinicopathologic features

We also analyzed the relationships between metastasis and clinicopathological variables of AE patients in Table 2. The total low expression rate of CD44 was 85.7% (30/35), while the total high expression rate of CD44 was 14.3% (5/35) in the metastasis AE tissues. The level of CD44 protein expression was found to correlate with metastasis (P = 0.004). The gender, age, size, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granulomatous did not show any relationship with metastasis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association between metastasis and various clinicopathological factors of AE

Character Metastatic Non-metastatic P
Gender
    Male 15 (42.9%) 63 (50.8%) 0.292
    female 20 (57.1%) 61 (49.2%)
Age, y
    <50 29 (82.8%) 92 (74.2%) 0.181
    ≥50 6 (17.2%) 32 (25.8%)
Size
    <15 24 (72.7%) 83 (67%) 0.955
    ≥15 9 (27.3%) 29 (33)
Calcification
    Present 25 (71.4%) 82 (66.1%) 0.913
    Absent 10 (28.6%) 42 (33.9%)
Necrosis
    Present 21 (60%) 94 (75.8%) 0.116
    Absent 14 (40%) 30 (24.2)
Foreign body granulomatous
    Present 20 (57.1%) 54 (43.5%) 0.586
    Absent 15 (42.9) 70 (56.4%)
CD44
    Low 30 (85.7%) 46 (37.1%) 0.004
    High 5 (14.3%) 78 (62.9%)

Association between risk factors and survival time

At the time of data analysis, with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 3-252 months), In 144 patients (90.6%) remained alive and 15 patients (9.4%) died. Several studies have shown that great advances in surgery techniques and albendazole have increased the survival rate of patients [16,17]. Factors with possible prognostic effects in AE were analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Statistical analysis showed that gender, age, size, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granulomatous, and CD44 had no prognostic value (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of the association between various paramaters and overall survival in patients with AE

Covariate HR 95% CI P
Gender
    Male vs. female 1.407 0.328-6.024 0.646
Age
    <50 vs. ≥50 1.603 0.378-6.79 0.522
Size
    <15 vs. ≥15 2.576 0.617-10.759 0.194
Calcification
    Present vs. absent 0.996 0.178-5.559 0.996
Necrosis
    Present vs. absent 0.640 0.123-3.334 0.596
Foreign bodygranulomatous
    Present vs. absent 0.074-2.224 0.298
Metastasis
    Present vs. absent 1.847 0.460-7.410 0.387
CD44
    Low vs. high 2.042 0.449-9.284 0.356

HR: hazard ration; CI: confidence interval.

Discussion

In humans, AE has similar features to cancer due to its invasion growth and destruction, and its distant metastases via the blood or lymphatic systems [18,19]. It is noteworthy that, the most devastating aspect of AE is the emergence of metastases, which is responsible for the majority of deaths from this disease. Thus, to understand the molecular mechanisms of metastasis is one of the most important issues in AE research. In the present study, we investigated candidates of molecular markers in order to predict pathological development.

CD44 was originally identified as the lymphocyte homing receptor in embryonic, hematopoietic, mesenchymal and epithelial cells [20,21]. According to recently studies, CD44 was associated with tumor progression, invasion and metastasis in cancer stem cells [22,23]. In the current study, we sorted and identified AE from clinical specimens, observing that the relationship between metastasis and the clinicopathological characteristics of AE. We found that CD44 expression was decreased in metastasis AE when compared to the control group by IHC. Additionally, it was identified that CD44 expression was associated with metastasis. However, no correlations between metastasis and gender, age, size, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granulomatous were identified. Thus, CD44 protein may be highly related to metastatic disease.

Furthermore, we found gender, age, size, calcification, necrosis, foreign body granulomatous, were no significantly associated with overall survival. As shown in Table 2, the expression of CD44 was associated with metastasis, while the expression of CD44 was not a prognostic predicator. The first reason is multimodality treatment. Mortality from AE has markedly declined, mainly owing to the advances in surgical techniques and albendazole treatment [24,25]. In the present series of 159 AE patients with long-term follow-up observations averaging >42 months, the fatality rate was 9.4%. The second reason is follow-up times. To facilitate better observe the patient’s prognosis, we should extend the follow-up time. Life expectancy in this group is substantially prolonged compared to previous observation. In addition, we hope to go on further study with larger Sample size in the near future.

Although correlation between CD44 expression and patient survival did not reach statistical significance, as determined by multivariate analysis, CD44 immunoreactivity may have the potential to be a good predictor of metastasis in AE patients. With regard to other cancer, CD44 expression in lymphoma, melanoma, vulvar cancer, cancers of the colon, breast, stomach, ovary, cervix, thyroid and lungs was correlated with disease progression, metastases and worse prognosis [26-28]. Further studies are need to clarify this tissue.

In conclusion, our study identified the decreased expression of CD44 was related to metastasis of AE, which may be a potential biomarker for the metastasis. In short, molecular immunological diagnosis for human AE needs further studies.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Research Fund from the Xinjiang Autonomous Region of China (No. XJKLE-2012-2).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Eckert J, Deplazes P. Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:107–135. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.1.107-135.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jiang C. Today’s regional distribution of echinococcosis in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2002;115:1244–1247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vuitton DA, Zhou H, Bresson-Hadni S, Wang Q, Piarroux M, Raoul F, Giraudoux P. Epidemiology of alveolar echinococcosis with particular reference to China and Europe. Parasitology. 2003;127(Suppl):S87–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Craig PS, Rogan MT, Campos-Ponce M. Echinococcosis: disease, detection and transmission. Parasitology. 2003;127(Suppl):S5–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Torgerson PR, Schweiger A, Deplazes P, Pohar M, Reichen J, Ammann RW, Tarr PE, Halkik N, Mullhaupt B. Alveolar echinococcosis: from a deadly disease to a well-controlled infection. Relative survival and economic analysis in Switzerland over the last 35 years. J Hepatol. 2008;49:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jiang C. Alveolar echinococcosis in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 1998;111:470–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matsuhisa T. [The mechanism of distant metastases of alveolar hydatid disease] . Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1996;71:369–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Galizia G, Gemei M, Del Vecchio L, Zamboli A, Di Noto R, Mirabelli P, Salvatore F, Castellano P, Orditura M, De Vita F, Pinto M, Pignatelli C, Lieto E. Combined CD133/CD44 expression as a prognostic indicator of disease-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2012;147:18–24. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weber GF, Bronson RT, Ilagan J, Cantor H, Schmits R, Mak TW. Absence of the CD44 gene prevents sarcoma metastasis. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2281–2286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gunthert U, Hofmann M, Rudy W, Reber S, Zoller M, Haussmann I, Matzku S, Wenzel A, Ponta H, Herrlich P. A new variant of glycoprotein CD44 confers metastatic potential to rat carcinoma cells. Cell. 1991;65:13–24. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90403-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martin TA, Harrison G, Mansel RE, Jiang WG. The role of the CD44/ezrin complex in cancer metastasis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:165–186. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barbour AP, Reeder JA, Walsh MD, Fawcett J, Antalis TM, Gotley DC. Expression of the CD44v2-10 isoform confers a metastatic phenotype: importance of the heparan sulfate attachment site CD44v3. Cancer Res. 2003;63:887–892. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pitule P, Cedikova M, Daum O, Vojtisek J, Vycital O, Hosek P, Treska V, Hes O, Kralickova M, Liska V. Immunohistochemical detection of cancer stem cell related markers CD44 and CD133 in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:432139. doi: 10.1155/2014/432139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu M, Wang H, Zhao J, Yuan Y, Wang C, Li J, Zhang L, Zhang L, Li Q, Ye J. Expression of CIDE proteins in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and their prognostic significance. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;378:145–151. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1605-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eckert J, Deplazes P. Alveolar echinococcosis in humans: the current situation in Central Europe and the need for countermeasures. Parasitol Today. 1999;15:315–319. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(99)01476-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu YH, Wang XG, Chen YT. [Computerized tomography of liver in alveolar echinococcosis treated with albendazole] . Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1993;32:733–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang C, Liu Y. A further study on liver alveolar echinococcosis. Report of 70 cases. Chin Med J (Engl) 1995;108:551–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miguet JP, Bresson-Hadni S. Alveolar echinococcosis of the liver. J Hepatol. 1989;8:373–379. doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(89)90037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McManus DP, Gray DJ, Zhang W, Yang Y. Diagnosis, treatment, and management of echinococcosis. BMJ. 2012;344:e3866. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gallatin WM, Weissman IL, Butcher EC. A cell-surface molecule involved in organ-specific homing of lymphocytes. Nature. 1983;304:30–34. doi: 10.1038/304030a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goldstein LA, Zhou DF, Picker LJ, Minty CN, Bargatze RF, Ding JF, Butcher EC. A human lymphocyte homing receptor, the hermes antigen, is related to cartilage proteoglycan core and link proteins. Cell. 1989;56:1063–1072. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90639-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Clevers H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med. 2011;17:313–319. doi: 10.1038/nm.2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li C, Heidt DG, Dalerba P, Burant CF, Zhang L, Adsay V, Wicha M, Clarke MF, Simeone DM. Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1030–1037. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wilson JF, Rausch RL, McMahon BJ, Schantz PM. Parasiticidal effect of chemotherapy in alveolar hydatid disease: review of experience with mebendazole and albendazole in Alaskan Eskimos. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:234–249. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.2.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Polat KY, Balik AA, Celebi F. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: clinical report from an endemic region. Can J Surg. 2002;45:415–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saegusa M, Hashimura M, Okayasu I. CD44 expression in normal, hyperplastic, and malignant endometrium. J Pathol. 1998;184:297–306. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199803)184:3<297::AID-PATH995>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Indinnimeo M, Cicchini C, Giarnieri E, Stazi A, Mingazzini PL, Stipa V. Evaluation of CD44 variant 6 expression and clinicopathological factors in pulmonary metastases from colon carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2003;10:1875–1877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Naor D, Wallach-Dayan SB, Zahalka MA, Sionov RV. Involvement of CD44, a molecule with a thousand faces, in cancer dissemination. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES