Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2015 Sep 1;8(9):11670–11674.

Association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and risk of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population

Libin Yang 1, Yongbo An 1, Guodong Wang 1, Tan Lu 1, Shujuan Yang 2
PMCID: PMC4637724  PMID: 26617908

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism could affect the development of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population. A total of 152 osteosarcoma patients and 304 health control subjects were included in our study. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was applied to assess the XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism. By conditional logistic regression analysis, we found that TT genotype of XRCC3 Thr241Met was associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma in codominant model (OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.28-5.39). Moreover, XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism was correlated with an elevated increased risk of osteosarcoma in dominant (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.03-2.34) and recessive models (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.16-4.56). In conclusion, we found that XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism was associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma in codominant, dominant and recessive models.

Keywords: XRCC3 Thr241Met, polymorphism, osteosarcoma, Chinese population

Introduction

Osteosarcoma is one of the most common bone malignancies, which often occurs in the distal femur, proximal tibia and humeral metaphysis. Osteosarcoma is more common in children and adolescents, and it is estimated that the annual incidence of this cancer is about 3.6/1,000,000 among children and adolescents [1]. It is well known that the development of osteosarcoma is a complex, multistep and multifactorial process, and many environmental and genetic factors are involved in the development of this cancer [2-4]. However, not all these cancer patients would develop osteosarcoma even when they have been exposed to similar risk factor, which suggests that genetic variations could influence the development of osteosarcoma. Several previous studies have reported that genetic factors may influence the development of osteosarcoma, such as RECQL5, GSTs, ABCB1 and VEGF genes [5-8].

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 is a member of DNA repair genes, and it is involved in the process of homologous recombination repair for DNA double-strand breaks so as to maintain the stability of genome [9]. XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphism is a common functional single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at codon 241 in exon 7 with a C to T transition [10]. Previous studies reported that XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism could influence the risk of several kinds of cancers, such as prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer and gastric cancer [11-14]. However, no previous study reported the association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and risk of osteosarcoma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism could affect the development of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population.

Materials and methods

Study population

Patients with pathologically proven osteosarcoma were included from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University between January 2012 and December 2014. All the osteosarcoma patients were newly diagnosed and previously untreated. Clinical and pathological information of the osteosarcoma patients was obtained from medical records, such as tumor location, stage, histological type and tumor metastasis. A total of 176 osteosarcoma patients were included in our study, and finally 152 patients agreed to participate into this study with a participation rate of 86.36%. The controls group consisted of 304 subjects without cancers, and the controls were selected from patients who received health examination in our hospital during the same period. Two control subjects matched with one patient in terms of age and gender.

The socio-demographic characteristics of the cases and controls were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire, such as age, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and family history of cancer. All the cases and controls voluntarily participated in the study and gave their informed consent. The ethical committee of our hospital approved the study protocols.

DNA extraction and SNPs genotyping

Each participant was asked to provide 5 ml blood sample for DNA extraction. The commercially available Qiagen kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) was used to extract DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay was applied to assess the XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism. Primers of XRCC3 Thr241Met were designed using Sequenom Assay Design 3.1 software, and the forward and reverse primers were 5’-TTGGGGCCTCTTTGAGA-3’ and 5’-AACGGCTGAGGGTCTTCT-3’, respectively. For PCR amplification, the standard program was used as follows: an initial denaturation step of 8 minutes at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. PCR products were digested with NlaIII restriction enzyme. Length of PCR products was 205 bp for XRCC3 Thr241Met. The resulting DNA fragments were electrophoresed on 3.5% agarose gel and visualized under UV light after ethidum staining.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics, version 16.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical differences between osteosarcoma patients and controls were analyzed by a Chi-squared test. Fisher’s exact test was taken to assess the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls. Conditional logistic regression analysis with adjusted OR and their associated 95% CIs was used to estimate the strength of association between the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and osteosarcoma risk. The most common control homozygote of XRCC3 Thr241Met was taken as reference for analysis. A two-tailed P value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The characteristics of patients with osteosarcoma and controls were shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between cases and controls in terms of sex (P value = 0.68) and age (P value = 1.00). For Enneking stage of 152 patients, 97 (63.82%) were stage I-II osteosarcoma, and 55 (36.18%) were stage III osteosarcoma. For tumor location of these patients, 110 (72.37%) were extremities osteosarcoma and 42 (27.63%) were other osteosarcoma. For the tumor metastasis of these cases, 58 (38.16%) were positive osteosarcoma and 94 (61.84%) were negative osteosarcoma.

Table 1.

Characteristics of osteosarcoma patients and control subjects

Variables Patients % Controls % χ2 value P value
Age, years
    < 20 94 61.84 182 59.87
    ≥ 20 58 38.16 122 40.13 0.17 0.68
Gender
    Female 64 42.11 128 42.11
    Male 88 57.89 176 57.89 0.00 1.00
Enneking stage
    I-II 97 63.82
    III 55 36.18
Tumor location
    Extremities 110 72.37
    Other 42 27.63
Tumor metastasis
    Negative 94 61.84
    Positive 58 38.16

The genotype frequencies of XRCC3 Thr241Met gene in osteosarcoma patients and controls were shown in Table 2. The genotype distributions of XRCC3 Thr241Met were in line with HWE in control group, and P value for HWE was 0.95. By χ2 test, there were significantly differences in genotype frequencies of XRCC3 Thr241Met between patients and controls (χ2 = 8.88, P value = 0.01). By conditional logistic regression analysis, we found that the TT genotype of XRCC3 Thr241Met was associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma in codominant model (OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.28-5.39). Moreover, XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism was correlated with an elevated increased risk of osteosarcoma in dominant (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.03-2.34) and recessive models (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.16-4.56).

Table 2.

Association between XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism and osteosarcoma risk

Model XRCC3 Thr241Met Patients % Controls % OR (95% CI)1 P value
Codominant CC 66 43.42 166 54.61 1.0 (Ref.) -
CT 63 41.45 117 38.49 1.35 (0.87-2.10) 0.15
TT 22 15.13 21 6.91 2.53 (1.28-5.39) 0.003
Dominant CC 66 43.42 166 54.61 1.0 (Ref.) -
CT+TT 85 56.58 138 45.39 1.55 (1.03-2.34) 0.03
Recessive CC+CT 129 84.87 283 93.09 1.0 (Ref.) -
TT 22 15.13 21 6.91 2.30 (1.16-4.56) 0.01
1

Adjusted for sex and age.

By stratification analysis, we did not find significant association of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism with Enneking stage, tumor location and tumor metastasis in the risk of osteosarcoma (Table 3). Moreover, no interaction was found between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and clinical characteristics (P for interaction > 0.05).

Table 3.

Stratification analysis of association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism in osteosarcoma risk by clinical characteristics

Variables CC % CT+TT % OR (95% CI)1 P value
Enneking stage
    I-II 45 68.18 52 61.18 1.0 (Ref.)
    III 21 31.82 34 40.00 1.40 (0.68-2.92) 0.33
Tumor location
    Extremities 49 74.24 61 71.76 1.0 (Ref.)
    Other 17 25.76 25 29.41 1.18 (0.54-2.61) 0.65
Tumor metastasis
    Negative 43 65.15 51 60.00 1.0 (Ref.)
    Positive 23 34.85 35 41.18 1.28 (0.63-2.64) 0.46
1

Adjusted for sex and age.

Discussion

Osteosarcoma was associated with several environmental factors, such as ionizing radiation [15]. Carcinogenic compounds exert their effect causing direct or indirect DNA alteration. Repair of DNA damage capacity which is under genetic control may be an important factor influencing osteosarcoma susceptibility. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes resulting in variation of DNA repair efficiency may therefore be associated with osteosarcoma risk. In the present study, we firstly reported the impact of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism in the susceptibility to osteosarcoma in a Chinese population.

Polymorphism in exon 7 of the XRCC3 gene results in an amino acid substitution at condon 241 could influence the enzyme function, and may affect its association with other DNA damage and repair proteins. Increasing studies have suggested that variations of XRCC3 Thr241Met gene may alter DNA repair capacity, and thus influence the susceptibility to carcinogens.

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown a strong association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and the development of several kinds of cancers, such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer and hepatocellular cancer [16-20]. Qureshi et al. conducted a study with 156 breast cancer patients and 150 controls in a Pakistani population, and they reported that XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism can be independent markers of breast cancer [16]. Nissar et al. investigated the role of XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism in colorectal cancer, and reported that CT and TT genotypes were associated with elevated risk of colorectal cancer [17]. Duan et al. conducted a meta-analysis with six individual studies, and they reported that XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism variant was significantly associated with hepatocellular cancer risk in the HBsAg (+) individuals [18]. However, some studies reported no association between XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism and cancer risk (Xing et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014). Xing et al. reported that XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism may not be associated with development of lung cancer [19]. One meta-analysis study with 12 case-control studies reported that XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism was not associated with an increased gastric cancer risk [20]. The discrepancies existed in results from different studies may be caused by different cancer types, sample size and study design.

Current, no previous study reported the association between XRCC3 Thr241Met and risk of osteosarcoma. In our study, we found that XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism was associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma in codominant, dominant and recessive models. Further large sample size studies are greatly needed to confirm our results.

Some limitations should be mentioned in this study. First, since a hospital-based case control study was taken in our study, the selection bias cannot be avoidable and the subjects may not be representative of the general population. Second, sample size of this study is relatively small, which may not have enough statistical power to explore the real association. Finally, the population in our study was only from Chinese population, which reduces the possibility of confounding from ethnicity, so it does not permit extrapolation of the results to other ethnic groups.

In conclusion, our study firstly reported the role of XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism in the susceptibility to osteosarcoma, and we found that XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism was associated with increased risk of osteosarcoma in codominant, dominant and recessive models. Future studies using larger sample size and employing either similar or different analytic strategies may help to elucidate the impact of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism in the risk of osteosarcoma.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Serlo J, Tarkkanen M, Sampo M, Vettenranta K, Riikonen P, Helenius I. Incidence, treatment and survival of paediatric patients with bone sarcomas in Finland from 1991 to 2005. Acta Paediatr. 2015;255:75–78. doi: 10.1111/apa.12986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Powers M, Zhang W, Lopez-Terrada D, Czerniak BA, Lazar AJ. The molecular pathology of sarcomas. Cancer Biomark. 2010;9:475–491. doi: 10.3233/CBM-2011-0170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bovee JV, Hogendoorn PC. Molecular pathology of sarcomas: Concepts and clinical implications. Virchows Arch. 2010;456:193–199. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0828-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Alava E. Molecular pathology in sarcomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2007;9:130–144. doi: 10.1007/s12094-007-0027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dong YZ, Huang YX, Lu T. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the RECQL5 gene increased osteosarcoma susceptibility in a Chinese Han population. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:1899–1902. doi: 10.4238/2015.March.13.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Han J, Deng W, Wang L, Qi W. Null genotypes of glutathione S-transferase μ1 and glutathione S-transferase θ1 are associated with osteosarcoma risk: A meta-analysis. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:1912–1916. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou Z, Chen Q, Zuo D, Wang H, Hua Y, Cai Z. ABCB1 (rs1128503) polymorphism and response to chemotherapy in patients with malignant tumors-evidences from a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:265–272. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tie Z, Bai R, Zhai Z, Zhang G, Zhang H, Zhao Z, Zhou D, Liu W. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in VEGF gene are associated with an increased risk of osteosarcoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:8143–8149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Griffin CS, Simpson PJ, Wilson CR, Thacker J. Mammalian recombination-repair genes xrcc2 and xrcc3 promote correct chromosome segregation. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:757–761. doi: 10.1038/35036399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shen MR, Jones IM, Mohrenweiser H. Nonconservative amino acid substitution variants exist at polymorphic frequency in DNA repair genes in healthy humans. Cancer Res. 1998;58:604–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xuan G, Hui Y, Fang H. The association of XRCC3 Thr241Met genetic variant with risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Afr Health Sci. 2015;15:117–122. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Namazi A, Abedinzadeh M, Nourbaksh P, Neamatzadeh H. Association between the XRCC3 Thr241Met Polymorphism and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: a Meta Analysis of 5,193 Cases and 6,645 Controls. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:2263–2268. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bei L, Xiao-Dong T, Yu-Fang G, Jian-Ping S, Zhao-Yu Y. DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Bull Cancer. 2015;10:332–339. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bashir H, Majid S, Hamid R, Farooq R, Wani HA, Shoib S, Bhat AA. Polymorphism of the XRCC3 gene and risk of gastric cancer in a Kashmiri population: a case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24:167–175. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ottaviani G, Jaffe N. The etiology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2009;152:15–32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Qureshi Z, Mahjabeen I, Baig R, Kayani M. Correlation between selected XRCC2, XRCC3 and RAD51 gene polymorphisms and primary breast cancer in women in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:10225–10229. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nissar S, Sameer AS, Lone TA, Chowdri NA, Rasool R. XRCC3 Thr241Met gene polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer in Kashmir: a case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:9621–9625. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.22.9621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Duan C, Zhang W, Lu J, Wu H, Liu M, Zhu W. DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:2827–2834. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0841-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xing ZS, Zhu G, Yang YL, Feng GQ, Ding GC. Meta analysis of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility of populations in East Asia. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7:483–487. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60079-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Z, Chen X, Liu B, Li S, Liu M, Xue H. Quantitative assessment of the associations between DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:1589–1598. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1219-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES