Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0140928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140928

Transgenic Rice Expressing Ictb and FBP/Sbpase Derived from Cyanobacteria Exhibits Enhanced Photosynthesis and Mesophyll Conductance to CO2

Han Yu Gong 1,2, Yang Li 1, Gen Fang 1, Dao Heng Hu 1, Wen Bin Jin 1, Zhao Hai Wang 1, Yang Sheng Li 1,*
Editor: Fan Chen3
PMCID: PMC4638112  PMID: 26488581

Abstract

To find a way to promote the rate of carbon flux and further improve the photosynthetic rate in rice, two CO2-transporting and fixing relevant genes, Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, which were derived from cyanobacteria with the 35SCaMV promotor in the respective constructs, were transformed into rice. Three homologous transgenic groups with Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and the two genes combined were constructed in parallel, and the functional effects of these two genes were investigated by physiological, biochemical and leaf anatomy analyses. The results indicated that the mesophyll conductance and net photosynthetic rate were higher at approximately 10.5–36.8% and 13.5–34.6%, respectively, in the three groups but without any changes in leaf anatomy structure compared with wild type. Other physiological and biochemical parameters increased with the same trend in the three groups, which showed that the effect of FBP/SBPase on improving photosynthetic capacity was better than that of ICTB and that there was an additive effect in ICTB+FBP/SBPase. ICTB localized in the cytoplasm, whereas FBP/SBPase was successfully transported to the chloroplast. The two genes might show a synergistic interaction to promote carbon flow and the assimilation rate as a whole. The multigene transformation engineering and its potential utility for improving the photosynthetic capacity and yield in rice were discussed.

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a staple food for more than half of the world’s population [1]. The world’s population is projected to grow from the present seven billion to an estimated ten billion people by 2050, with the growth concentrated in rice-consuming and rice-producing regions of Asia, Africa and the Americas [1,2]. Thus, each remaining hectare will have to feed at least 43 (presently 27) people in Asia due to population growth and increasing urbanization [3]. Concomitantly, more extreme weather, a scarcity of water and environmental pollution could also exert adverse effects on rice production [4,5]. Thus, the rice yield will have to increase by at least 50% over the next 40 years to prevent the mass malnutrition of the 700 million Asians that currently rely on rice for more than 60% of their daily caloric intake [3], and photosynthesis has been a major target for improving plant productivity via crop biotechnology in recent years [6].

Previous studies have shown that more than 90% of the crop biomass is derived from photosynthetic products, and the enhancement of photosynthesis at the level of per leaf area increases yields [79]. However, conventional breeding practices may be approaching a ceiling effect [10]. Recently, transgenic technology has been widely used to manipulate photosynthesis by overexpressing particular exogenous genes or introducing new enzymes or pathways that can positively influence photosynthesis [11].

Cyanobacteria have been regarded as ideal model systems for studying fundamental biochemical processes such as oxygenic photosynthesis and carbon and nitrogen assimilation, and it offers a rich source of genes for plant genetic engineering and the improvement of photosynthetic CO2 fixation [12,13]. The notable advantage of introducing cyanobacterial genes into plants was illustrated clearly by Zurbriggen et al. [14]. In addition, cyanobacteria have been present on earth for 3.5 billion years [15], during which time, they have endured a changing gaseous environment in which CO2 has declined and O2 increased. This environmental change has imposed evolutionary pressure on the cyanobacteria to evolve strategies for effective photosynthetic CO2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) to improve carboxylation via their relatively inefficient Rubisco enzyme [16,17]. The CCM involves five C i uptake systems to effectively pump bicarbonate as the major carbon source and concentrate CO2 up to 1000-fold around the active site of Rubisco [18], however, the majority of the higher plants that belong to the C3 group, including most crop plants, do not possess this ability.

In C3 plants, due to the low kinetic affinity for CO2 and high resistance in the CO2 diffusion pathway (liquid phase in mesophyll cells), the partial pressure of CO2 at the catalytic site of Rubisco (C c, chloroplast CO2 concentration) is usually not saturated for carboxylation and is the ultimate limiting factor for photosynthesis [19,20]. Several genes have been identified in cyanobacteria that could promote the transport of CO2 and photosynthetic carbon assimilation. One gene is Ictb (inorganic carbon transporter B), which is involved in HCO3 - accumulation in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Its expression showed positive effects on photosynthesis [2123], although the detailed mechanisms suggested by Price et al. were unclear [13]. The second gene is FBP/Sbpase (fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase or sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase), which is a dual functional enzyme in cyanobacteria that can hydrolyze both FBP (fructose-1,6-bisphosphate) and SBP (sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate) with almost equal specific activities in addition to directly targeting Rubisco [24]. FBP/Sbpase plays an important role in regulating carbon flow and the regeneration phase of RuBP (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate) and in catalyzing the first irreversible reaction in the conversion of triose phosphates to sucrose [25], as revealed by an increasing photosynthetic rate in tobacco [2630].

Photosynthesis in plants has been considered for decades to be limited by only two factors: the velocity of the diffusion of CO2 through stomata, and the capacity of the photosynthetic machinery to convert light energy to biochemical energy and fix CO2 into sugars [31]. To improve mesophyll conductance to CO2 (g m) and further boost photosynthesis and yields, our basic aim was that rice should be reengineered at the biochemical level in the Calvin cycle to combine with inorganic carbon transport routes simultaneously and to achieve the high-efficiency operation of these two major processes in mesophyll cells. Although transgenic plants with cyanobacterial genes have been generated over the last two decades [12], most of them concentrated on single gene that acting on only one site in the biochemical or substance-transporting route. Based on the original work from the laboratories of Kaplan (Ictb) and Shigeoka (FBP/Sbpase) illustrated above, and considering the results of Feng et al. [32] from our laboratory, overexpression of the SBPase gene can enhance photosynthesis and growth under salt stress conditions as well as tolerance to CO2 assimilation during high temperature stress. Lieman-Hurwitz et al. [23] illustrated that the Ictb gene could improve photosynthetic rates compared to wild type under limiting but not under saturating CO2 concentrations. These results inferred that only one gene related to the Calvin cycle or carbon diffusion had not a significant effect on the enhancement of photosynthesis under normal natural conditions and had a much smaller effect on the yield. To overcome these shortcomings, we focused our analysis on the complete functions of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase compared with their respective functions derived from cyanobacteria following their introduction into rice. We anticipated that they would act on inorganic carbon transport and carboxylation in the Calvin cycle, respectively, further increasing the rate of CO2 transportation and the carboxylation efficiency under natural field conditions, potentially providing significant information for researching photosynthesis and rice production.

Materials and Methods

Construct generation

Full-length Ictb (dc14) and the optimised coding sequence of FBP/Sbpase (D49680) (S1 File) derived from Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 were amplified by PCR using primers Ictb-f (5' cggggtaccatgactgtctggcaaactctgac 3'), Ictb-r (5' gagtctagactacattttttcgtctgaatgct 3') and FS-f (5' cggggtaccatggctcaatccaccacttccgag 3'), FS-r (5' gagtctagatcagccaagcaggctgtcgacaaagt 3') respectively. The products were cloned into vector pUC18-35S-rbcs-nos skeleton (Wuhan biorun bio-tech. Co., Ltd), and the sequences were verified and found to be identical. The amplified 35S-rbcs-Ictb-nos and 35S-rbcs-FBP/Sbpase-nos skeletons were digested with BamHI, SalI and EcoRI, BamHI respectively, then ligated into pCAMBIA1301 to make pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:Ictb:nos} and pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:FBP/Sbpase:nos} respectively, and the sequences were verified by sequencing.

As for Ictb+FBP/Sbpase construct, the amplified 35S-rbcs-FBP/Sbpase-nos skeletons were cut and ligated into pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:Ictb:nos} to produce pCAMBIA1301{35S:rbcs:FBP/Sbpase:nos}{35S:rbcs:Ictb:nos}. The amplified 35S-rbcs-nos sequences from pUC18-35S-rbcs-nos skeleton were digested with EcoRI and HindIII, and ligated into pCAMBIA1301 to generate the empty construct. All the sequences were verified by sequencing and found to be identical. The two genes were under control of the CaMV 35S promotor which directs constitutive high-level transcription of the transgenes, and guided by chloroplastic transit signal sequence rbcs (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit) and followed by nos termination sequences to provide single Ictb and FBP/Sbpase and binary (Ictb-FBP/Sbpase) gene expression recombinant plasmids.

Generation of transgenic plants

The single (Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, respectively) and binary (Ictb-FBP/Sbpase) gene expression recombinant plasmids, and empty construct plasmid were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 (Fig 1A). The Oryza sativa spp. indica vs. 9311 (wild-type) was transformed with these resultant plasmids using the standard Agrobacterium-mediated method as described previously [22,33]. Shoots were regenerated on selective medium containing hygromycin (50 mg L–1), and T1 plants were obtained by self-pollination of primary transformants (T0). T6 plants from 2013 were used in photosynthetic, physiological and biochemical analysis for three experimental replicates in this study.

Fig 1. Production and selection of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase sense transgenic rice plants.

Fig 1

A. Schematic representation of the T-DNA region of the pCAMBIA1301 binary vector. LB: left border, RB: right border. The sense construct contained full-length cyanobacterial Ictb and FBP/Sbpase cDNA driven by the CaMV 35S promoter, the nopaline synthase termination sequence and rb: chloroplastic transit signal sequence rbcs (ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit). B. Western blot analysis of transformants and WT rice. Ten micrograms of leaf protein samples from the newest fully mature leaves were separated by SDS-PAGE, and specific polyclonal antibodies were used to detect ICTB and FBP/SBPase proteins with the correct sizes. HSP (housekeeping protein) served as an internal control. WT: wild-type, Oryza sativa spp. indica vs. 9311. Marker: SM0671. C. Southern blot analysis showing the presence of the two target genes, Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, in the genomes of the transgenic lines. Genomic DNA was digested with BamH1 and hybridized with [α32P] dCTP-labeled specific probe. M: Marker, 1 Kb ladder. D. RT-PCR analysis of transgenic lines and wild-type based on the results of the western blot and southern blot analyses. Each lane represents a sample obtained from one individual line, and the 400-bp and 350-bp-long Ictb and FBP/Sbpase cDNA fragments, respectively, were obtained. Actin served as a loading control. M: Marker DS2000.

Plant growth conditions

The seeds of these transgenic plants were allowed to germinate on agar in the presence of 50 mgL-1 hygromycin, and the seeds of the wild type plants were allowed to germinate on agar in the absence of hygromycin. After growth for four weeks, 300 plants of each independent line in every group as an experimental unit was transferred to the same experimental field paddy and planted in sets of three. All of the experimental units were distributed randomly and grown under the same environmental conditions in Huashan country (exclusive transgenic rice experimental field of Wuhan university, Wuhan city, E114°31′, N30°32′). All of the measurements of physiological and biochemical parameters were conducted on flag leaves in the flowering stage after sowing for 97 days. The samples were selected randomly in the center of each line to obtain three experimental repeats for every group to avoid the edge effect of the rice population in the paddy. Data were derived from three independent replicates of each line in five groups.

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Approximately 0.1 g leaf tissue was harvested from the youngest fully expanded leaves and used for protein estimation and gel blot analysis. Protein estimation was determined according to the Bradford method using BSA as a standard. Equal amounts of proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and then probed using the specific polyclonal antibodies Anti-OsICTB and Anti-OsFBP/SBPase in 15 lines. The polyclonal antibodies were generated by immunizing healthy rabbits using the synthesized peptides of full-length ICTB (AAB08477) and FBP/SBPase (BAA08536) as antigens. The protein conjugations, immunizations, and antiserum purifications were performed by BPI (Beijing Protein Innovation Co., Ltd, Beijing, China), with an initial purity ≥ 90%. The entire generation process of antibody and the application of western blot detection using rice tissues were validated by the BPI company following the instructions of Li et al. [34]. Proteins were detected using horseradish peroxidase conjugated to the secondary antibody and Super-ECL® HRP chemiluminescence detection reagent (SuperSignal® west Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate, Thermo Scientific, USA).

Southern blot hybridization

Southern blot analysis was performed to verify the integration and copy number of the two targeted genes. The genomic DNA (30 μg) from WT and 14 transgenic lines was digested overnight with BamHI, separated in a 1% agarose gel and blotted onto a nylon transfer membrane (Nytran® SPC, GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, WhatmanTM, Amersham, UK). Probes with a size of 400 bp and 350 bp for the Ictb and FBP/Sbpase genes were prepared from PCR-amplified fragments using specific primers, respectively, and labeled with [ɑ32P] dCTP using the Random Primer DNA Labeling Kit Ver.2.0 (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The filter was hybridized to the labeled probe at 65°C overnight, washed with 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS once at room temperature and twice at 65°C for 15 min each and finally washed twice with 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65°C for 15 min each. The membrane was processed for autoradiography. All of the procedures for the hybridization were performed as described previously [35].

RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from fully expanded flag leaves of all of the lines using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and treated with DNase I following the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was performed to amplify the Ictb and FBP/Sbpase transcripts with specific primers: Ictb-1: 5′-cggttgccgacttcacctcacgg-3′, Ictb-2: 5′-ttgctgctgtcttcacgcccca-3′ and FS-1: 5′-ccgatcggtcgctatacgctgct-3′, FS-2: 5′-ggcgataccttcgggccactgca-3′ respectively. Actin transcript was also amplified as a control using the specific primers actin-1: 5′-gccttggcaatccacatc-3′ and actin-2: 5′-agcatgaagatcaaggtggtc-3′. The RT-PCR analysis was repeated three times in each line with similar results.

Subcellular localization

The subcellular localization of the two genes was investigated by introducing a binary vector containing CaMV 35S:: Ictb-GFP, CaMV 35S:: rbcs-Ictb-GFP and CaMV 35S:: rbcs-FBP/Sbpase-GFP. The latter two constructs were almost identical to the initial transgenic binary vector with the only difference being the addition of GFP as an indicator in the rice mesophyll protoplasts. The protoplasts were prepared from 2-week-old etiolated rice seedlings that were grown hydroponically and used for transformation by the polyethylene glycol method as described by Cinelli et al. [36]. The GFP signal was observed using a FluoView FV1000 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (Olympus).

Gas exchange, fluorescence measurements and the determination of mesophyll conductance

Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured simultaneously using a Li-Cor 6400 portable photosynthesis open system (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The measurements were performed using expanded flag leaves from 9:00 to 11:00 during the flowering stage under the conditions of a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 1200 μmol m-2s-1 and C a-c (ambient CO2 concentration in the cuvette) of 380 μmol mol-1 in the leaf chamber. The natural air temperature in the paddy field was 33–35°C, and the constant relative humidity (RH) was maintained at 80±5%. Photosynthetic parameters such as gas-exchange measurements, F s (steady-state fluorescence), and Fm (maximum fluorescence) were recorded after the measurement system remained stable. All of the experimental procedures illustrated above were performed according to Li et al. [37].

Measurements of P n/C i (P n: net photosynthetic rate; C i: intercellular CO2 concentration) and light response (P n/PPFD) curves were conducted on the same leaves under the conditions described above, and the procedure was conducted according to Li et al. [37]. C a-c was set as a series of 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 μmol CO2 mol-1, while PPFD was maintained as 1200 μmol m-2s-1. The initial slope of the P n/C c curves was calculated as the carboxylation efficiency (CE) when C c was <200 μmol CO2 mol-1. Regarding the measurements of the light response curves, C a-c was maintained at 380 μmol mol-1 in the leaf chamber, while PPFD was adjusted following a series of 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800 and 2000 μmol photons m-2s-1 based on the methods of Li et al. [37].

The rate of mitochondrial respiration in the light (R d) and the CO2 compensation point related to C i (Γ*) were measured according to Li et al. [37]. The intersection point of the P n-C i curves was assessed at three different light intensities (150, 300 and 600 μmol m-2s-1), where P n represented -R d, and C i indicated Γ*. The measurements were conducted using the same flag leaves in the flowering stage from 0: 00 h to 4: 00 h in paddy fields [3840]. At each PPFD detailed above, C a-c was set as the series of 0, 25, 50, 80, and 100 μmol CO2 mol-1. To promote stomatal opening, the leaves were placed in the cuvette with a PPFD of 600 μmol photons m-2s-1 and a C a-c of 100 μmol CO2 mol-1 for thirty minutes. The determination of Γ* and R d was repeated three times and resulted in values that did not differ (P <0.05) according to Warren [41]. Γ* was corrected for the effects of temperature based on the temperature response equations reported by Bernacchi et al. [42].

Based on the gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, estimations of the total electron transport rate (J T) were calculated based on the procedures of Genty et al. [43] and Valentini et al. [44], and g m and C c were conducted using the method described by Harley et al. [45], as follows:

JT=(Fm'Fs)/Fm'×PPFD×αleaf×β
gm=PnCiΓ*[JT+8(Pn+Rd)]JT4(Pn+Rd)
Cc=CiPngm

where αleaf is the total leaf absorbance and is assumed to be 0.85 [37,46,47], and β represents the partitioning of the absorbed quanta between the two photosystems and is assumed to be 0.5 for C3 plants [37,48,49]. These equations have been commonly used to calculate the above values by Flexas et al. [19], Hassiotou et al. [49], and Vrábl et al. [50], among others.

Determination of LMAs (leaf dry mass per area) and yield traits

LMA was measured using the same leaves that were used for the photosynthetic measurements. The leaf area was measured by a digital analysis of the images using ImageJ software (National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) [51]. The dry mass was determined after the leaves had been oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h to a constant mass. Finally, the LMA (gm-2) was calculated as the ratio of leaf dry mass to leaf area, and these measurements were repeated three times for each line.

The main yield traits, including tiller number per plant, filled grains per panicle, kilo-grain weightiness (g) and plant height (cm) of the 14 transgenic lines and WT were investigated in the paddy field and laboratory. All of the calculations described above were performed three times for each line in every group, and the experimental operations were conducted on T6 generation.

Measurements of WSC levels, Rubisco activity, and chlorophyll content and calculation of J cmax

After the gas exchange measurements were performed, the same flag leaves were used to measure water soluble carbohydrates (WSCs: the sum of the concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose), Rubisco activity and chlorophyll content. The concentrations of WSCs in the extracts were measured using the modified anthrone procedure [52,53]. Rubisco activity was determined using a plant RUBPCase/Rubisco assay kit (GENMED SCIENTIFICS INC. USA), and the experimental protocol was conducted following the manufacturer’s instructions. The chlorophyll content of the leaf discs was determined by adapting the modified procedure described by Porra et al. [54]. Photographs were obtained to measure the leaf surface area, and the area values were calculated using the ImageJ software to convert mg/gFW to g/m2. Next, samples (0.2 g) of fresh leaf tissue were homogenized in 100% acetone at 4°C away from sunlight, and the fluorescence was measured at 663 nm and 645 nm with a spectrophotometer (TECAN, INFINITE M200 PRO) after centrifugation of the homogenates. The total chlorophyll content (mg/gFW) of the leaves was determined according to the modified equation described by Arnon [55]:

(8.04A663+20.29A645)×v1000w

The light-saturated potential rate of electron transport (J max) can be calculated according to the electron transport rate dependence on the chlorophyll concentration and was found to be 467 μmol photons (g Chl)-1s-1. The RuBP regenerative capacity (J cmax) was determined from J max according to the equation of Li et al. [37] and Farquhar et al. [56]:

Jcmax=Jmax/(4+4Φ)

where Φ is the ratio of the oxygenation rate (V o) to the carboxylation rate (V c), which was assumed to have a constant value of 0.25. All of the experiments and calculations above were performed at least three times for each line.

Microscopy

The midrib veins were removed from expanded flag leaf blades and cut into sections of approximately 5×2 mm. The sections were fixed and dehydrated following the protocol detailed by Scafaro et al. [57]. Transverse sections (thickness of 7 μm and 80 nm) were cut for light and transmission electron microscopy, respectively, and measured using ImageJ software. S mes indicating the surface area of the mesophyll cells to the intercellular airspace was calculated as follows:

Smes=FLmesW

where F is the curvature correction factor and is assumed to be 1.55 [5759]. L mes is the length of the mesophyll cells exposed to the intercellular airspace (μm), and W is the width of the analyzed section (μm). Leaf and mesophyll thickness were measured at the mid-point between vascular bundles and bulliform cells. All of the procedures described above were performed according to the methods reported by Scafaro et al. [57].

Electron microscopy

Leaf samples for transmission electron microscopy were examined using a Tecnai G2 20 S-TWIN transmission electron microscope (TEM). The percentage of the cell periphery adjacent to the IAS that was covered by chloroplasts and stromules (S c/S mes) was calculated as the length of the cell periphery facing the IAS covered by chloroplasts (S c) divided by the total length of the cell periphery facing the IAS (S mes). S c was the surface area of the chloroplasts exposed to the intercellular airspace determined as follows:

Sc=LcLmes'Smes'

where L mes ' is the length of the mesophyll exposed to the intercellular airspace, and L c is the length of the chloroplasts exposed to the intercellular airspace. The mesophyll cell wall thickness was measured and randomly selected from 6–12 sections per electron micrograph using ImageJ software, and these experimental manipulations were based on the instructions illustrated by Scafaro et al. [57].

Measurements of stomatal density, stomatal size and stomatal index

To measure the stomatal density, stomatal index and stomatal size, the abaxial surface of the flag leaf was sampled separately from the WT and 14 transgenic lines at the flowering stage. These samples were first washed in sterile water and then fixed in FAA fixative (10% formaldehyde, 5% glacial acetic acid, 50% absolute ethanol, 35% sterile water). The samples were then washed serially in 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 95 and 100% ethanol solutions, and the subsequent protocols were conducted according to the procedure for improved desiliconization and scraping described by Chen et al. [60]. All of the samples were viewed using DIC optics with a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i microscope equipped with a CCD camera, and the stomata and epidermal cells were counted in five square areas of 0.068 mm2 per leaf. The stomatal index (SI) was calculated using the following equation: SI = number of stomata / (number of stomatal + number of non-stomatal epidermal cells) × 100%. Stomatal and epidermal cell counts were determined for three repeats per plant from three individual plants of each line in every group.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) was applied to assess the differences for each parameter among transgenic and wild-type groups. Differences among means were established using Duncan’s test (P < 0.05). The data were analyzed applying the SPSS 10.0 program for Windows.

Results

Production and selection of rice transformants

The western blot analysis resulted in the identification of the target proteins ICTB and FBP/SBPase at 51.6 and 37.2 KD, respectively (Fig 1B), which were confirmed by southern blot analysis and RT-PCR (Fig 1C and 1D), and the constructs had inserted in the genomes of transgenic lines with only one copy of each gene. The results indicated that lines 40, 50, 51, 67 and 70 expressed Ictb (ICTB group), while lines 33, 53 and 80 expressed FBP/Sbpase (hereafter referred to as FS group), 41, 49 and 69 were Ictb and FBP/Sbpase expressing lines belonging to ICTB+FS group, lines 52, 61 and 81 were the empty construct group, and the WT group was 9311. The analyses of photosynthetic performance, mesophyll conductance to CO2 and other physiological traits were detected on the lines of these five groups.

In vivo subcellular localization of ICTB and FBP/SBPase

Successful transformation and expression of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase were achieved in rice, but it was unclear whether the proteins were localized in functional, interacting subcellular spaces related to CO2 transport and fixation. Consequently, the in vivo subcellular localization of ICTB and FBP/SBPase were tested by transiently expressing their fused GFP proteins in living rice protoplasts (Fig 2). The results showed that ICTB was present in the cytoplasm with or without RBCS signal peptide. In the present case, it was possible that our initial procedure was insufficient to deliver ICTB into chloroplasts and that the final destination was in the cytoplasm. Because eukaryotic cells are highly compartmentalized and the subcellular localization of a protein is intrinsic to its function [61]. The protein localization findings may support role for ICTB in transcellular carbon delivery to chloroplasts, as reported for aquaporins [62], which has a positive role in accelerating carbon diffusion and improving g m in the liquid phase (Table 1). FBP/SBPase localized in the chloroplast and might promote CO2 assimilation in the transgenic lines based on our results (Table 1). These results meant that they exerted functions at different sites in the route of CO2 transport and assimilation respectively, thereby improving the photosynthetic efficiency.

Fig 2. Subcellular localization of ICTB and FBP/SBPase protein.

Fig 2

A, Bright field view of protoplasts. B, GFP signals from the ICTB-GFP fusion protein. C, Merged images. D, Red chlorophyll autofluorescence used as a chloroplast marker. E, GFP signals from the ICTB-RBCS-GFP fusion protein. F, Merged images. G, Red chlorophyll autofluorescence. H, GFP signals from the FBP/SBPase-RBCS-GFP fusion protein. I, Merged images, with yellow fluorescence in the merged images due to red chloroplast autofluorescence.

Table 1. Photosynthetic parameters of the transgenic, WT and empty construct groups.

Empty construct ICTB FS ICTB+FS WT
g m (mol CO 2 m -2 s -1 ) 0.18 ± 0.04 0.21 ± 0.04* 0.24 ± 0.05* 0.26 ± 0.05* 0.19 ± 0.03
P n (μmol CO 2 m -2 s -1 ) 13.1 ± 0.1 15.1 ± 0.6* 16.5 ± 0.1* 17.9 ± 0.2* 13.3 ± 0.1
CE 0.183 ± 0.023 0.177 ± 0.043 0.164 ± 0.011 0.181 ± 0.029 0.191 ± 0.073
g s (mol CO 2 m -2 s -1 ) 0.16 ± 0.01 0.20 ± 0.01* 0.23 ± 0.01* 0.27 ± 0.04* 0.15 ± 0.01
Rubisco activity (μmol CO 2 min -1 ) 0.62 ± 0.04 0.74 ± 0.02* 0.81 ± 0.03* 0.87 ± 0.03* 0.63 ± 0.03
Chlorophyll content (g/m 2 ) 0.33 ± 0.03 0.36 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.02
J max (μmol photons m -2 s -1 ) 153.6 ± 14.9 169.2 ± 10.5 165.5 ± 9.6 157.2 ± 4.8 149.4 ± 9.3
J cmax (μmol CO 2 m -2 s -1 ) 30.7 ± 3.0 33.8 ± 2.1 33.1 ± 1.9 31.4 ± 1.0 30.0 ± 1.9
WSC (g/100 g) 2.5 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.1* 3.6 ± 0.2* 3.8 ± 0.1* 2.6 ± 0.3
LMA (gm -2 ) 50.1 ± 0.3 52.8 ± 1.4* 56.6 ± 0.4* 59.7 ± 0.8* 50.3 ± 1.1

*Asterisks indicate a significant difference (P<0.05) from the wild type and empty construct.

☆Asterisks above ICTB+FS column indicate a significant difference (P<0.05) from two one-gene transgenic groups respectively.

☆Asterisks above FS column indicate a significant difference (P<0.05) from ICTB group.

Values are means ± SD for all lines with three biological replicates per group.

Effect of Ictb and FBPase/SBPase on the variation in leaf anatomical properties

We assessed whether the increased g m and P n in the transgenic groups resulted from the changes in leaf anatomy properties because leaf anatomy plays a major role in determining the mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 and, consequently, the variability in photosynthetic capacity among species [63]. Transverse sections of the leaf lamina examined by light and transmission electron microscopy revealed no significant leaf anatomical differences between the transgenic groups and WT (Fig 3, S1 Table). The five groups displayed similar leaf thicknesses, with numerical values of 89.8±4.9 μm, 90.6±3.5 μm, 91.5±3.6 μm, 91.3±4.2 μm and 90.8±6.1 μm for the empty construct, ICTB, FS, ICTB+FS and WT, respectively (S1 Table). The same trend was observed for the mesophyll wall thickness (Fig 3C, 3F, 3I, 3L and 3O, S1 Table). In rice, most of the cell periphery adjacent to the IAS is covered by chloroplasts and stromules. Furthermore, chloroplasts encompass almost the entire periphery of highly lobed cells, with stromules extend along the cell periphery that is not covered by chloroplasts (S c/S mes≧0.92; S1 Table). The values obtained for S mes and S c were not significantly different between the transgenic groups and WT (S1 Table), which is consistent with a previous report [64]. There were no differences in the number of chloroplasts per mesophyll area and the sizes of the chloroplasts, which were determining factors for g m. Similar results were obtained in the area occupied by epidermal or bulliform cells. All of the groups had the same amount of sclerenchymatous and bundle-sheath tissue, which may be an indicator of similar structural support. The cross-sectional area occupied by the vascular bundle and intercellular airspace was also similar between the transgenic groups and WT. Taken together, our results demonstrated that all of the transgenic groups and WT had a similar leaf anatomical structure (Fig 3), and the introduced target genes did not change the anatomical properties of the leaves. Moreover, these results further demonstrated that the transgenic groups and WT had similar inter-cellular and intracellular spaces and structures for CO2 diffusion and that the increased g m and P n in the transgenic groups was not due to the properties of the leaf anatomy.

Fig 3. Light and transmission electron micrographs of transverse leaf sections from empty, transgenic and WT groups.

Fig 3

Empty (A, B, C), ICTB (D, E, F), FS (G, H, I), ICTB+FS (J, K, L) and WT (M, N, O) lines. BF, bulliform cell; BS, outer bundle-sheath cell; C, chloroplast; CW, mesophyll cell wall; E, epidermis; IC, intercellular airspace; M, mesophyll cell; N, nucleus; SC, sclerenchyma strand; ST, stromule, indicated by white arrows; STC, stomatal cavity; V, vacuole; VB, vascular bundle.

Lack of significant phenotypic variations in the stomatal traits of the transgenic groups compared to WT

The stomatal density and stomatal index of the three transgenic groups and WT at the flowering stages were shown in S1 Fig. The average stomatal density (SD) of the transgenic groups ranged from 746 to 756 mm-2 in comparison to 751 mm-2 for WT at the flowering stage. The average pavement cell (PC) density of the transgenic groups ranged from 1124 to 1153 mm-2, while the value obtained for WT was 1126 mm-2. The total cells (TCs) in the transgenic groups ranged from 1871 to 1909 mm-2 compared to 1877 mm-2 in WT (S1A Fig), and stomatal index (SI) in the three transgenic groups ranged from 0.39–0.40 compared with 0.40 in WT (S1B Fig). The results revealed that the two target genes did not substantially modify the stomatal distribution, which is the first component in the CO2 transport path, and these groups had almost the same stomatal structural properties and density, which showed that the improved photosynthetic performance was not due to the structural properties of the stomata.

Impact of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase expression on photosynthetic performance in the flowering stages

Gas exchange measurements were used to investigate whether the P n of three transgenic groups were higher than that of wild-type under the same light intensity and C a in natural paddy fields in which the plants were grown. The response curve of P n to varying C i was assessed by measuring the CO2 uptake, which indicated that the difference became significant between transgenic groups and WT as the C i increased above 200 μmol CO2 mol-1, the values of P n tended to stabilize and attain saturation in all of the groups when the C i levels exceeded 400 μmol CO2 mol-1 (Fig 4A). The changing range of P n in the ICTB, FS, ICTB+FS groups was 31.3–31.9 (mean value 31.6±0.2), 33.4–34.5 (mean value 34.1±0.4) and 35.4–37.3 μmol CO2 m-2s-1 (mean value 36.8±0.6), respectively, while that of WT and the empty construct was 26.6–26.8 (mean value 26.7±0.1) and 27.3–28.3 (mean value 27.7±0.3) at the CO2 saturation points, respectively (data not shown). This result indicated that the P n of three transgenic groups was higher than that of WT with values of approximately 18.4%, 27.7% and 37.8% respectively, and also suggested that the increased ability to perform a maximal photosynthetic rate in the transgenic groups was due to the functions of these two genes because the WT and empty construct groups displayed almost the same performance, and the photosynthetic ability increased in the order of Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and Ictb+FBP/Sbpase expression, which showed greater improvements in the photosynthetic capacity with FBP/Sbpase than Ictb. An additive effect was observed in the ICTB+FS groups (Ictb+FBP/Sbpase).

Fig 4. Differences in photosynthetic parameters measured using expanded flag leaves of rice plants between transgenic, WT and empty construct groups at the flowering stage.

Fig 4

A, B, C. P n responses to C i, C c and PPFD respectively. Values are means ± SD for all lines with three biological replicates per group. D. Phenotype of wild-type, empty construct and three transgenic groups at the maturation stage.

Obtaining an estimate of g m allows the simple conversion of P n-C i curves into response curves of P n to C c [65]. Using this method, we found that differences in the curves between the three transgenic groups and WT became significant and stabilized when C c was higher than 400 μmol CO2 mol-1 roughly (Fig 4B), and this trend was identical to that of the P n/C i response curve. Taken together, these results indicated that the two target genes can improve the CO2 assimilation capacity of the transgenic groups compared with WT and empty construct groups based on the same C i or C c.

The response of P n to PPFD was measured (Fig 4C) under the same atmospheric conditions (C a = 380 ± 10 μmolmol-1; RH = 80 ± 5%) but with various light intensities (0–2,000 μmol m-2s-1) at 35°C. At irradiances below 200 μmol m-2s-1, the three transgenic groups did not display clear difference in photosynthetic rates with respect to WT. As the light intensity increased, the photosynthetic rates of the three transgenic groups increased significantly compared to WT when the light intensity ranged from 500 to 2,000 μmolm-2s-1. Photo-saturation of photosynthesis was observed when the light intensity exceeded 1,500 μmol m-2s-1. In comparison to WT, the light saturation point for the transgenic groups ICTB, FS and ICTB+FS was higher by approximately 17.9%, 25.5% and 37.5%, respectively, and the value obtained for the empty construct was very similar to that of WT. The results indicated that the light conversion efficiency increased sequentially in the three transgenic groups and exhibited an additive effect in the ICTB+FS group. This result could be explained by the two genes having the ability to promote CO2 flux and P n and further increase the demands for light energy in rice.

The related photosynthetic parameters exhibited a significant increase in transgenic groups compared to WT

The P n-PPFD and P n-C i curves in Fig 4 illustrated significant differences in P n at a PPFD of 1200 μmol m-2s-1 and C a of 380 μmol CO2 mol-1 among the different groups. In three transgenic groups, ICTB+FS displayed the highest values (17.9 μmol CO2 m-2s1), ICTB had the lowest values (15.1), and FS displayed values in the middle (16.5), which were 36.6%, 15.3% and 26.0% higher than the 13.1 of WT, respectively (Table 1). In addition, the P n value for ICTB+FS was higher than that of the ICTB and FS groups by 18.5 and 8.5%, respectively, and the FS value was significantly higher than that determined for the ICTB groups by 9.3%. Similar differences were observed in g s (stomatal conductance to CO2) and g m. Likewise, clear differences were observed in the total activity of Rubisco, LMA and WSC (Table 1), demonstrating the same trend as observed for P n illustrated above.

C c is the ultimate limiting factor for light-saturated photosynthesis after CO2 enters the stomatal pore. CO2 molecules must pass through other phases to reach the carboxylation site (C c), i.e., the cell wall, plasmalemma, cytosol, chloroplast envelope and stroma. Many recent studies have demonstrated that P n depends primarily on the transportation of CO2 [45]. To estimate g m and CE under conditions of PPFD of 1200 μmol m-2s-1, 35°C and C a = 380 μmol CO2 mol-1, measurements of gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence were conducted and analyzed concurrently [65,66]. Our results showed that the values for g m in the three transgenic groups ICTB, FS and ICTB+FS, were 10.5%, 26.3% and 36.8% higher than WT, respectively. Nevertheless, the corresponding values for CE didn’t show significant increment since there were no differences of P n values between groups as C c was <200 μmol CO2 mol-1 indicated by the P n/C c curves (Table 1, Fig 4B). These results demonstrated that the efficiency of CO2 transport from the air to the carboxylation site had been improved and further increased P n based on the growth trend observed for the ICTB, FS and ICTB+FS groups. The results also indicated that the cyanobacterial Ictb and FBP/Sbpase genes promoted CO2 transport capacity and carbon fixation efficiency in rice.

Compared to WT, similar chlorophyll content were observed in the leaves of the three transgenic groups, resulting in almost the same value for J max (Table 1). In our study, 2,000 μmol photons m-2s-1 was a saturating light intensity due to the stable value of P n obtained for these groups at the atmospheric CO2 concentration, and it could provide sufficient ATP, NADPH, and RuBP for carboxylation that was significantly less than J cmax (Fig 4C; Table 1). These results suggested that the RuBP regeneration rate was not a limiting factor for the light-saturated photosynthetic rate. With the increase in C c, P n increased to approach the value of J cmax, and C c was >600 μmol CO2 mol-1 in all of the groups when P n attained the maximal value (Fig 4B). All of the above findings indicated that C c was the ultimate limiting factor for photosynthesis when C c was not saturated [37].

Yield traits and plant height were partly improved by Ictb and FBP/Sbpase

The rice grain yield is mainly determined by three components, including the tiller number per plant, filled grain number per panicle, and the grain weight [67]. In the present study, only the tiller number per plant in the ICTB+FS group displayed a significant increment compared with FS, ICTB and WT group respectively, while the other two components did not show an increase (S2A–S2C Fig). In FS group, kilo-grain weightiness decreased significantly compared to WT and ICTB group respectively although tiller number and filled grains per panicle were slightly higher than that of WT. As for ICTB group, the three components did not exhibit any increase in contrast with WT, and it seemed the main yield traits in the one-gene transgenic groups had not been improved. In addition, the plant height in three transgenic groups were clearly increased compared with the WT plants, and ICTB group showed significant while ICTB+FS and FS group showed great significant increment (Fig 4D; S2D Fig). The results indicated that the tillering capacity in ICTB+FS and the biomass above ground of three transgenic groups were significantly higher than those of WT.

Discussion

Leaf anatomy and mesophyll conductance to CO2

The photosynthetic rate in plants is determined by the velocity of the diffusion of CO2 through stomata and the capacity to fix CO2 into sugar. The stomatal pore and the path through the mesophyll from the cell wall to Rubisco are two primary resistance to CO2 diffusion. The mesophyll pathway comprises a series of physical barriers to CO2 diffusion, including cell walls, lipid membranes, liquid cytoplasm and stroma [63,68]. Our basic goal was to reduce the resistance in the mesophyll pathway by introducing the cyanobacterial Ictb gene to boost mesophyll conductance, which is also influenced by the structure of the leaf [49,57,63,6971]. The ultimate goal was to increase the CO2 carboxylation efficiency by introducing another cyanobacterial FBP/Sbpase gene in rice. However, our results showed that the leaf anatomy was similar in almost all respects between the three transgenic groups, WT and the empty construct, and there were no differences in the stomatal density, S c/S mes, thickness of the mesophyll cell wall or chloroplast size, which are critical structural components of a leaf that affect g m [37,63,68]. This finding indicated that the increased g m and P n in the transgenic groups was not due to the effect of the leaf anatomy properties and mesophyll cell structure but to the biochemical functions of ICTB and FBP/SBPase. In addition, the expression of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase, whether alone or together, would modify the diffusion limitations along the biochemical path of CO2 transport rather than the physical diffusion conductance inside the leaves.

Many previous analyses have demonstrated that g m and P n change to permit adaptation to the environmental conditions in which the species evolves, such as light, nutrients, water and temperature [37,7276]. In our study, the transgenic groups and WT were planted in the same paddy field with the same ecological niche, and thus, different effects of environmental factors on leaf and mesophyll cell structure and properties between transgenic groups and WT were precluded. The present results indicated that the two target genes were not sufficient to modify the leaf anatomy structure, such as the arrangement of mesophyll cells in the CO2 diffusion path and the surrounding chloroplasts directly abutting the mesophyll cells. The results also suggested that the increased P n and g m were not related to the leaf anatomy structure but were due to the biochemical functions of the two target genes. In addition, the results indirectly proved that the leaf anatomy structure was determined mainly by the environmental conditions, as suggested by previous studies such as Assuero et al. [77] and Gomez-Del-Campo et al. [78].

Flexas et al. [31] demonstrated the occurrence of an evolutionary trend towards a higher g m, and the photosynthetic capacity of angiosperms was greatly increased following the cretaceous period in association with the changes in leaf morphology. Evolutionary pressure resulted in the evolution of strategies to efficiently acquire inorganic carbon for photosynthesis [79]. In addition, cultivated rice has been domesticated and selected for approximately 8000–10,000 years [80], and it shows extensive stromule formation that allows S c/S m to approach 1.0, which is consistent with our findings and higher than the values observed for species without stromules in which S c/S m never exceeds 0.8 [81]. These observations support the hypothesis that stromules in photosynthetic cells function to seal breaches between adjacent chloroplasts, thus improving the trapping mechanism of photorespired and respired CO2 [59,81]. However, the adjustment in mesophyll cell thickness, geometry and packing according to ambient light conditions may function to control the distribution of internal light and maximize light absorption and carbon fixation within the leaf [82]. Considered together with our results, these observations demonstrated that rice had evolved a sophisticated leaf anatomy structure and cellular ultrastructure for trapping CO2 from the intercellular airspace and created optimal conditions for improving the photosynthetic rate. In the present study, the two target genes were related to CO2 transport and fixation but not to the cell structure, and it seems plausible that it was very difficult to change the mesophyll structure under natural environmental conditions.

The effect of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase on biochemical functions, physiological and yield traits

In our results, Rubisco activity of transgenic groups increased significantly compared with WT and the empty construct. The values for CE showed no differences as C c was <200 μmol CO2 mol-1, and P n exhibited marked difference along with the increasing of C c when C c was >200 μmol CO2 mol-1. These results supported the previous conclusions that the carboxylation capacity and activity of Rubisco are regulated by the chloroplastic CO2 concentration and which is also generally considered to be an ultimate limiting factor for CO2 fixation [37]. Thus, ICTB and FBP/SBPase could promote carbon diffusion and stimulated the activity and carboxylation capacity of Rubisco alone or together and then achieved higher P n at CO2 saturation point. The other photosynthetic parameters determined for the empty construct group were very similar to those of WT, which indicated that the expression construct alone without target genes could not change the photosynthetic capacity and that the increased parameters in the transgenic groups was not a consequence of the construct sequence or a mutation in the host genome due to an insertion. Thus, in the ICTB+FS group, the functional additive effect could be explained by the ability of ICTB to boost the carbon flux and drive more CO2 into the chloroplast. Then, the Calvin cycle is accelerated by FBP/Sbpase to consume and convert carbon to avoid carbon redundancy. Carbon transport and carboxylation reactions were linked together by these two genes and improved simultaneously, and they were usually associated with the photosynthetic capacity.

The expression of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase also exerted positive effects on LMA and WSC compared with WT, but no differences were observed between them in terms of the anatomical structure of the leaf. A tentative conclusion might be drawn from these results as follows, the increased LMA primarily resulted from the increased WSC, and the increased WSC produced by the improved photosynthesis was not used to build the structural components such as support tissues and cell wall, which involve stronger CO2 diffusion limitations for photosynthesis and likely only accumulated chemical substances in mesophyll cells. In the three transgenic groups, ICTB+FS exhibited the highest value for LMA and WSC (Table 1) and showed higher tiller number (S2A Fig). These results indicated that the capacity to preserve and transport WSC to grains increased only under the addition effect of ICTB and FS, although the photosynthetic parameters in FS and ICTB groups showed significant increment compared to that of WT. These results inferred that photosynthetic capacity was not always related to the yield traits positively, and the potential underlying mechanisms require further analysis because rice yield is considered to be a quantitative trait that is controlled by multiple genes [83]. These findings also demonstrated that neither expression of both nor one of the target genes was sufficient to improve all of the yield traits, and potential problems associated with improving the rice yield in the transgenic groups might remain unresolved due to the limitations of our techniques. The most probable explanation was that the carbohydrate export pathway from source to sink should be facilitated to avoid carbohydrate redundancy in mesophyll cells.

The relationships of Ictb, FBP/Sbpase and light energy conversion capacity

In addition to the velocity of CO2 diffusion through stomata and the capacity to fix CO2 into sugar, photosynthesis in plants has also been considered for decades to be limited by the capacity of the photosynthetic machinery to convert light energy into biochemical energy. Our results revealed no differences in chlorophyll content among the three transgenic groups compared with WT and the empty construct group, which had similar values for J max and J cmax. Although the Ictb and FBP/Sbpase genes were not directly related to light absorbance and conversion, they promoted g m and the light-saturated photosynthetic rate compared with WT. Considering that J max is maximal light-driven electron flux and can be used to estimate the potential photosynthetic capacity derived from light and the capacity for RuBP regeneration, these results indicated that the capacity of the photosynthetic machinery to convert light into biochemical energy and the RuBP regenerative capacity were similar and sufficient to increase P n and g m. A possible explanation was that these two increased photosynthetic parameters was not related to the capacity to convert light energy but mainly to the biochemical function of these two proteins alone or combined.

The functional synergistic effect of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase

Subcellular localization studies suggested that FBP/SBPase was present in chloroplasts and ICTB was in the cytoplasm with or without RBCS signal peptide. These studies indicated that our initial transgenic procedures could not deliver ICTB into chloroplasts, and the potential observed mechanisms were likely a result of an eclipsed distribution [61,84]. These findings could be ascribed to its intrinsic function as a membrane protein and a natural address in the cytoplasm, coinciding with the assertion that ICTB is related to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and can cause an accumulation of unfolded membrane proteins in the ER to produce a classic ER shock response, as proposed by Agarwal et al. [85], Urade [86] and Price et al. [13]. Nevertheless, the ICTB protein alone had a positive effect on photosynthetic parameters such as g m and P n despite its location outside the chloroplast, in accordance with our initial purpose, because it could deliver CO2 more effectively through the cytomembrane and liquid phase cytoplasm, which are considered important obstacles to carbon flux. These findings and the results of Simkin et al. [87] provided partial answers to the question proposed by Price et al. [13] and clues for further studies of the function of Ictb.

Based on the assertions illustrated above, a positive effect in two one-gene groups and an additional effect in the ICTB+FS group, the two target proteins likely have a synergistic interaction which was also confirmed in tobacco by Simkin et al. [87], and this interaction without a physical binding could be interpreted as a functional interaction according to Bassel et al. [88]. Thus, ICTB potentially decreased the CO2 transfer resistance in mesophyll cells, and FBP/SBPase promoted carbon assimilation in chloroplasts and improved the overall photosynthetic capacity in the transgenic groups.

Conclusions and Expectations

The g m is an important limiting factor in photosynthesis, comprising ~20 to ~50% of the photosynthetic limitations [89], and C s/C a = 0.60 to 0.85 (C s, CO2 concentration in the sub-stomatal cavity). However, the amount of CO2 drawn from the sub-stomatal cavity to the bulk intercellular spaces is small, and the ratio is as follows: C i/C s = 0.90 to 0.99 [68]. The two values can be converted to C i/C a = 0.7, which is remarkably constant across C3 species [90]. Techniques to improve the velocity of CO2 absorbance from intercellular space into mesophyll cells (that is, how to utilize CO2 in the intercellular space sufficiently to increase g m) is an important research topic. Because it is impractical to change the structure of the stomatal cavity due to its bi-functionality and regulation of water vapor diffusion [91], an effective method is to improve the permeability of the cell wall and chloroplast envelope to CO2 transport because they have been identified as major limiting components to CO2 transport [68].

ICTB was located in the cytoplasm and contributed to improvements in g m and P n, while FBP/SBPase was located in chloroplasts and demonstrated improved functionality compared with ICTB. These results inferred the function of the genes operating in the Calvin cycle (located in chloroplasts) were more important than those only acting on the carbon diffusion (located in cytoplasm) for the promotion of photosynthesis. This results explained the acceleration of the Calvin cycle to more efficiently consume and convert carbon, and both an intense requirement for CO2 and the promotion of g m and P n were observed. These effects were more pronounced than those in ICTB group, although ICTB alone could also promote g m and P n.

Based on the better performance of the yield traits in the ICTB+FS group and the ideal tactics illustrated above, we think that the most effective method is the transformation of a key gene in the Calvin cycle and other genes that function at different sites in the carbon flux pathway to form a “bead-like” pattern and improve the entire efficiency of CO2 transport and fixation. We are attempting to assemble a CO2 transport and assimilation (Calvin cycle) chain to improve the photosynthetic rate and yield traits via multigene transfer (MGT), and we anticipate that this issue will become a high priority in future studies.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Phenotypic distributions of the stomatal density at the flowering stage of the three transgenic, WT and empty construct groups grown in the same paddy field.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Agronomic traits of the transgenic rice groups, WT and empty construct groups.

(TIF)

S1 File. The full length of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase CDS sequence.

(DOC)

S1 Table. Leaf anatomical properties of three transgenic, WT and empty construct groups.

(DOC)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/, National Natural Science Foundation of China. (31271699) Han Yu Gong; http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/, National Natural Science Foundation of China. (30971741) Yang Sheng Li. The National Program of Transgenic Variety Development of China (Grant No. 2011ZX08001-001 and 2011ZX08001-004); and Key Grant Project of Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant No. 313039). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Yang SM, Chang CY, Yanagisawa M, Park I, Tseng TH, Kumarice SB. Transgenic rice expressing cyanobacterial bicarbonate transporter exhibited enhanced photosynthesis, growth and grain yield. In: Allen JF, Gantt E, Golbeck JH, Osmond B, eds. Photosynthesis. Energy from the Sun: 14th International Congress on Photosynthesis. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2008. pp. 1243–1246.
  • 2. Dawe D. Agricultural research, poverty alleviation and key trends in Asia’s rice economy In: Sheehy JE, Mitchell PL, Hardy B, eds. Charting New Pathways to C4 Rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 2007. pp. 37–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hibberd JM, Sheehy JE, Langdale JA. Using C4 photosynthesis to increase the yield of rice-rationale and feasibility. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008; 11 (2): 228–231. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bouman BAM, Lampayan RM, Tuong TP. Water management in irrigated rice: coping with water scarcity Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sheehy JE, Ferrer AB, Mitchell PL. Harnessing photosynthesis in tomorrow’s world: Humans, crop production and poverty alleviation. In: Allen JF, Gantt E, Golbeck JH, Osmond B, eds. Photosynthesis. Energy from the sun. 14th International Congress on Photosynthesis, Springer; 2008. pp. 1243–1248.
  • 6. Sinclair TR, Purcell LC, Sneller CH. Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 9 (2): 70–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ. 2006; 29: 315–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mitchell PL, Sheehy JE. Supercharging rice photosynthesis to increase yield. New Phytol. 2006; 171 (4): 688–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Makino A. Photosynthesis, grain yield, and nitrogen utilization in rice and wheat. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155: 125–129. 10.1104/pp.110.165076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kurek I, Liu L, Zhu GH. Engineering photosynthetic enzymes involved in CO2 assimilation by gene shuffling In: Rebeiz CA, et al. eds. The Chloroplast: Basics and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. pp. 307–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Mitchell RA, Madgwick PJ, Keys AJ. Manipulation of Rubisco: the amount, activity, function and regulation. J Exp Bot. 2003; 54: 1321–1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Park YI, Choi SB, Liu JR. Transgenic plants with cyanobacterial genes. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2009; 3: 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Price GD, Pengelly JJ, Forster B, Du J, Whitney SM, von Caemmerer S, et al. The cyanobacterial CCM as a source of genes for improving photosynthetic CO2 fixation in crop species. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64 (3): 753–768. 10.1093/jxb/ers257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zurbriggen MD, Carrillo N, Hajirezaei MR. Use of cyanobacterial proteins to engineer new crops In: Kirakosyan A, Kaufman PB, eds. Recent Advances in Plant Biotechnology. Springer Verlag; 2009. pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Buick R. The antiquity of oxygenic photosynthesis: evidence from stromatolites in sulphate-deficient Archaean lakes. Science. 1992; 255: 74–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Price GD, Klughammer B, Ludwig M, Badger MR. The functioning of the CO2 concentrating mechanism in several cyanobacterial strains: a review of general physiological characteristics, genes, proteins, and recent advances. Can J Bot. 1998; 76 (6): 973–1002. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kaplan A, Reinhold L. CO2 concentrating mechanisms in photosynthetic microorganisms. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999; 50: 539–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fukuzawa H, Kaplan A, Ogawa T. The uptake of CO2 by cyanobacteria and microalgae In: Eaton-Rye JJ, Tripathy BC, Sharkey TD, eds. Photosynthesis: Plastid Biology, Energy Conversion and Carbon Assimilation, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012; (34): 625–650. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Hanson DT, Bota J, Otto B, Cifre J, et al. Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO2 in vivo. Plant J. 2006; 48: 427–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Li Y, Ren BB, Yang XX, Xu GH, Shen QR, Guo SW. Chloroplast downsizing under nitrate nutrition restrained mesophyll conductance and photosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012; 53 (5): 892–900. 10.1093/pcp/pcs032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bonfil DJ, Ronen-Tarazi M, Sültemeyer D, Lieman-Hurwitz J, Schatz D, Kaplan A. A putative HCO3 - transporter in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. FEBS Lett. 1998; 430: 236–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ku MS, Agarie S, Nomura M, Fukayama H, Tsuchida H, Ono K, et al. High-level expression of maize phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in transgenic rice plants. Nat Biotechnol. 1999; 17 (1): 76–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lieman-Hurwitz J, Rachmilevitch S, Mittler RYM, Kaplan A. Enhanced photosynthesis and growth of transgenic plants that express ictB, a gene involved in HCO3 - accumulation in cyanobacteria. Plant Biotechnol J. 2003; 1: 43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tamoi M, Ishikawa T, Takeda T, Shigeoka S. Molecular characterization and resistance to hydrogen peroxide of two fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatases from Synechococcus PCC 7942. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996; 334 (1): 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Serrato AJ, de Dios Barajas-López J, Chueca A, Sahrawy M. Changing sugar partitioning in FBPase-manipulated plants. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (10): 2923–2931. 10.1093/jxb/erp066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Harrison EP, Willingham NM, Lloyd JC, Raines CA. Reduced sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase levels in transgenic tobacco lead to decreased photosynthetic capacity and altered carbohydrate accumulation. Planta. 1998; 204: 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Miyagawa Y, Tamoi M, Shigeoka S. Overexpression of a cyanobacterial fructose-1, 6-/sedoheptulose-1, 7-bisphosphatase in tobacco enhances photosynthesis and growth. Nat Biotechnol. 2001; 19: 965–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Raines CA. The Calvin cycle revisited. Photosynth Res. 2003; 75 (1): 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tamoi M, Nagaoka M, Yabuta Y, Shigeoka S. Carbon metabolism in the Calvin cycle. Plant Biotechnol J. 2005; 22: 355–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Feng LL, Han YJ, Liu G, An BG, Yang J, Yang GH, et al. Overexpression of sedoheptulose-1, 7-bisphosphatase enhances photosynthesis and growth under salt stress in transgenic rice plants. Funct Plant Biol. 2007; 34 (9): 822–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Flexas J, Barbour MM, Brendel O, Cabrera HM, Carriquí M, Díaz-Espejo A, et al. Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2012; 193–194: 70–84. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Feng LL, Wang K, Li Y, Tan YP, Kong J, Li H, et al. Overexpression of SBPase enhances photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic rice plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2007; 26 (9): 1635–1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Toki S. Rapid and efficient agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1997; 15 (1): 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Li X, Bai H, Wang X, Li L, Cao Y, Wei J, et al. Identification and validation of rice reference proteins for western blotting. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62: 4763–4772. 10.1093/jxb/err084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lin YJ, Zhang QF. Optimising the tissue culture conditions for high efficiency transformation of indica rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2005; 23 (8): 540–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cinelli RA, Ferrari A, Pellegrini V, Tyagi M, Giacca M, Beltram F. The enhanced green fluorescent protein as a tool for the analysis of protein dynamics and localization: local fluorescence study at the single-molecule level. Photochem Photobiol. 2000; 71: 771–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Li Y, Gao Y, Xu X, Shen Q, Guo S. Light-saturated photosynthetic rate in high-nitrogen rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves is related to chloroplastic CO2 concentration. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (8): 2351–2360. 10.1093/jxb/erp127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Brooks A, Farquhar GD. Effect of temperature on the CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light: Estimates from gas-exchange measurements on spinach. Planta. 1985; 165: 397–406. 10.1007/BF00392238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Guo S, Schinner K, Sattelmacher B, Hansen U. Different apparent CO2 compensation points in nitrate- and ammonium-grown Phaseolus vulgaris and the relationship to non-photorespiratory CO2 evolution. Physiologia Plantarum. 2005; 123 (3): 288–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Guo SW, Zhou Y, Shen QR, Zhang FS. Effect of ammonium and nitrate nutrition on some physiological processes in higher plants-growth, photosynthesis, photorespiration, and water relations. Plant Biol. 2007; 9: 21–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Warren CR. Estimating the internal conductance to CO2 movement. Funct Plant Biol. 2006; 33: 431–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR Jr, Long SP. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2001; 24: 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989; 990 (1): 87–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Valentini R, Epron D, De Angelis P, Matteucci G, Dreyer E. In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant Cell Environ. 1995; 18 (6): 631–640. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Harley PC, Loreto F, Di Marco G, Sharkey TD. Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 flux by analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO2 . Plant Physiol. 1992; 98 (4): 1429–1436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ehleringer J, Pearcy RW. Variation in quantum yield for CO2 uptake among C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol. 1983; 73: 555–559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Albertsson P. A quantitative model of the domain structure of the photosynthetic membrane. Trends Plant Sci. 2001; 6 (8): 349–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ögren E, Evans JR. Photosynthetic light response curves. 1. The influence of CO2 partial pressure and leaf inversion. Planta. 1993; 189: 182–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hassiotou F, Ludwig M, Renton M, Veneklaas EJ, Evans JR. Influence of leaf dry mass per area, CO2, and irradiance on mesophyll conductance in sclerophylls. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (8): 2303–2314. 10.1093/jxb/erp021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Vrábl D, Vašková M, Hronková M, Flexas J, Šantrůček J. Mesophyll conductance to CO2 transport estimated by two independent methods: effect of variable CO2 concentration and abscisic acid. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (8): 2315–2323. 10.1093/jxb/erp115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with IMAGEJ. Bioph Otonics International. 2004; 1 (7): 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, Glassop D, Shorter R. Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2008; 67 (3): 197–214. 10.1007/s11103-008-9311-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Xue GP, McIntyre CL, Jenkins CL, Glassop D, van Herwaarden AF, Shorter R. Molecular dissection of variation in carbohydrate metabolism related to water soluble carbohydrate accumulation in stems of wheat (triticum aestivam L.). Plant Physiol. 2008; 146 (2): 441–454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989; 975 (3): 384–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 1949; 24 (1): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta. 1980; 149 (1): 78–90. 10.1007/BF00386231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Scafaro AP, von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Atwell BJ. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance in cultivated and wild Oryza species with contrasting mesophyll cell wall thickness. Plant Cell Environ. 2011; 34: 1999–2008. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02398.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Thain JF. Curvature correction factors in the measurement of cell surface areas in plant tissues. J Exp Bot. 1983; 34: 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Sage TL, Sage RF. The functional anatomy of rice leaves: implications for refixation of photorespiratory CO2 and efforts to engineer C4 photosynthesis into rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009; 50 (4): 756–772. 10.1093/pcp/pcp033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Chen WF, Cheng HW, Liu LX, Xu ZJ, Hou XY. A new method for studying the stomatal characters of rice leaf. Acta Agron Sin. 2000; 26 (5): 623–626. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Escobar NM, Haupt S, Thow G, Boevink P, Chapman S, Oparka K. High-throughput viral expression of cDNA-green fluorescent protein fusions reveals novel subcellular addresses and identifies unique proteins that interact with plasmodesmata. Plant Cell. 2003; 15 (7): 1507–1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Uehlein N, Otto B, Hanson DT, Fischer M, McDowell N, Kaldenhoff R. Function of Nicotiana tabacum aquaporins as chloroplast gas pores challenges the concept of membrane CO2 permeability. Plant Cell. 2008; 20 (3): 648–657. 10.1105/tpc.107.054023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Tomás M, Flexas J, Copolovici L, Galmés J, Hallik L, Medrano H, et al. Importance of leaf anatomy in determining mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 across species: quantitative limitations and scaling up by models. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64 (8): 2269–2281. 10.1093/jxb/ert086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Sage TL, Williams EG. Structure, ultrastructure, and histochemistry of the pollen tube pathway in the milkweed Asclepias exaltata L. Sex Plant Reprod. 1995; 8 (5): 257–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Manter DK, Kerrigan J. A/Ci curve analysis across a range of woody plant species: influence of regression analysis parameters and mesophyll conductance. J Exp Bot. 2004; 55 (408): 2581–2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Epron D, Godard D, Cornic G, Genty B. Limitation of net CO2 assimilation rate by internal resistances to CO2 transfer in the leaves of two tree species (Fagus sylvatica L. and Castanea sativa Mill.). Plant Cell Environ. 1995; 18 (1): 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Xing YZ, Zhang QF. Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61: 421–442. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tholen D, Niinemets Ü. Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2011; 155 (1): 108–116. 10.1104/pp.110.165472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kodama N, Cousin A, Tu KP, Barbour MM. Spatial variation in photosynthetic CO2 carbon and oxygen isotope discrimination along leaves of the monocot triticale (Triticum × Secale) relates to mesophyll conductance and the Péclet effect. Plant Cell Environ. 2011; 34: 1548–1562. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02352.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Peguero-Pina JJ, Flexas J, Galmés J, Niinemets U, Sancho-Knapik D, Barredo G, et al. Leaf anatomical properties in relation to differences in mesophyll conductance to CO2 and photosynthesis in two related Mediterranean Abies species. Plant Cell Environ. 2012; 35: 2121–2129. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02540.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Tosens T, Niinemets Ü, Westoby M, Wright IJ. Anatomical basis of variation in mesophyll resistance in eastern Australian sclerophylls: news of a long and winding path. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63 (14): 5105–5119. 10.1093/jxb/ers171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Niinemets Ü, Díaz-Espejo A, Flexas J, Galmés J, Warren CR. Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60 (8): 2249–2270. 10.1093/jxb/erp036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Yu J, Chen S, Zhao Q, Wang T, Yang C, Diaz C, et al. Physiological and proteomic analysis of salinity tolerance in Puccinellia tenuiflora . J Proteome Res. 2011; 10 (9): 3852–3870. 10.1021/pr101102p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Yu HT, Xu SB, Zheng CH, Wang T. Comparative proteomic study reveals the involvement of diurnal cycle in cell division, enlargement, and starch accumulation in developing endosperm of Oryza sativa . J Proteome Res. 2012; 11 (1): 359–371. 10.1021/pr200779p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Maire V, Martre P, Kattge J, Gastal F, Esser G, Fontaine S, et al. The coordination of leaf photosynthesis links C and N fluxes in C3 plant species. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7 (6): e38345 10.1371/journal.pone.0038345 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Xu C, Fisher R, Wullschleger SD, Wilson CJ, Cai M, McDowell NG. Toward a mechanistic modeling of nitrogen limitation on vegetation dynamics. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7 (5): e37914 10.1371/journal.pone.0037914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Assuero SG, Matthew C, Kemp P, Barker DJ, Mazzanti A. Effects of water deficit on Mediterranean and temperate cultivars of tall fescue. Aust J Agr Res. 2002; 53: 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Gomez-Del-Campo M, Ruiz C, Baeza P, Lissarrague JR. Drought adaptation strategies of four grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Modification of the properties of the leaf area. J Int Sci Vigne Vin. 2003; 37: 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Feild TS, Brodribb TJ, Iglesias A, Chatelet DS, Baresch A, Upchurch GR, et al. Fossil evidence for cretaceous escalation in angiosperm leaf vein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108 (20): 8363–8366. 10.1073/pnas.1014456108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Callaway E. Domestication: The birth of rice. Nature. 2014; 514: S58–S59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Busch FA, Sage TL, Cousins AB, Sage RF. C3 plants enhance rates of photosynthesis by reassimilating photorespired and respired CO2 . Plant Cell Environ. 2013; 36: 200–212. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02567.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. James SA, Bell DT. Leaf morphological and anatomical characteristics of heteroblastic eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot. 2001; 49 (2): 259–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Tripathi AK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL. Narrowing down the targets for yield improvement in rice under normal and abiotic stress conditions via expression profiling of yield-related genes. Rice. 2012; 5: 37 10.1186/1939-8433-5-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Regev-Rudzki N, Pines O. Eclipsed distribution: A phenomenon of dual targeting of protein and its significance. BioEssays. 2007; 29: 772–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Agarwal PK, Agarwal P, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2006; 25 (12): 1263–1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Urade R. The endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathways in plants. Biofactors. 2009; 35 (4): 326–331. 10.1002/biof.45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Simkin AJ, McAusland L, Headland LR, Lawson T and Raines CA. Multigene manipulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation increases CO2 fixation and biomass yield in tobacco. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66 (13): 4075–4090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Bassel GW, Gaudinier A, Brady SM, Hennig L, Rhee SY, De Smet I. Systems analysis of plant functional, transcriptional, physical interaction, and metabolic networks. Plant Cell. 2012; 24 (10): 3859–3875. 10.1105/tpc.112.100776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Evans JR, von Caemmerer S. Temperature response of carbon isotope discrimination and mesophyll conductance in tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 2013; 36: 745–756. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02591.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61 (1): 235–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Damour G, Simonneau T, Cochard H, Urban L. An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ. 2010; 33: 1419–1438. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Phenotypic distributions of the stomatal density at the flowering stage of the three transgenic, WT and empty construct groups grown in the same paddy field.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Agronomic traits of the transgenic rice groups, WT and empty construct groups.

(TIF)

S1 File. The full length of Ictb and FBP/Sbpase CDS sequence.

(DOC)

S1 Table. Leaf anatomical properties of three transgenic, WT and empty construct groups.

(DOC)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES