Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Dec 9;15(1):27–34. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.990889

Synthetic high-density lipoprotein-like nanoparticles for cancer therapy

Linda Foit †,, Francis J Giles x, Leo I Gordon y,z, C Shad Thaxton †,‡,z,¶,*
PMCID: PMC4638421  NIHMSID: NIHMS733399  PMID: 25487833

Summary

High-density lipoproteins (HDLs) are a diverse group of natural nanoparticles that are most well-known for their role in cholesterol transport. However, HDLs have diverse functions that provide significant opportunities for cancer therapy. Presented is a focused review of the ways that synthetic versions of HDL have been used as targeted therapies for cancer, and as vehicles for the delivery of diverse therapeutic cargo to cancer cells. As such, synthetic HDLs are likely to play a central role in the development of next generation cancer therapies.

Keywords: High-density lipoprotein; cholesterol; cancer, drug delivery; nucleic acids; scavenger receptor

Cholesterol Metabolism and Cancer

Cholesterol metabolism and cancer are tightly linked: A sustained and increased supply of cholesterol is essential for cancer cell proliferation and tumor progression. Cancer-related anomalies of cholesterol metabolism have been implicated in angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance [1]. On a cellular level, cholesterol is a crucial component of membranes and modulates their fluidity, stability, and overall architecture [2]. Additionally, cholesterol is known to accumulate in discrete regions of the membrane, endowing these areas with unique properties. These so-called lipid rafts serve as assembly platforms for molecules involved in signaling cascades, including those associated with development [35]. Finally, cholesterol serves as a precursor for steroid hormones, which are known regulators of cell proliferation and differentiation, and are critical players in the progression of breast and prostate cancer [1,4].

In a healthy organism, cholesterol homeostasis is achieved by joint regulation of cellular synthesis, influx, and efflux [4]. Cholesterol synthesis is usually limited to the liver, adipose and lactating breast tissues, but it is also up-regulated in cancer cells [6,7]. Since cholesterol is minimally soluble in water, its transport within the human body is mediated by lipoproteins – highly organized, yet very dynamic emulsions composed of lipids, proteins and additional components. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) is the major lipoprotein that delivers cholesterol from the liver to healthy peripheral cells [1,8,9]. Cholesterol from LDLs is taken up through LDL receptor-mediated endocytosis and transported to the lysosome [1]. By contrast, high density lipoprotein (HDL) both delivers and removes cholesterol from cells. One of the main functions of HDL is to remove excess cholesterol from peripheral cells and deliver it to the liver for excretion in the bile, a process called reverse cholesterol transport [10]. HDL further delivers cholesterol to steroidogenic tissues [10]. Lipoproteins also play a critical role in cancer progression through delivery of cholesterol to malignant cells. Consistently, many cancer patients exhibit reduced levels of cholesterol in the blood [1113], which are restored to normal values upon successful remission [14]. Malignant cells overexpress the HDL-specific high-affinity scavenger receptor B1 (SR-B1) [2,13,1518]. Consistently, exogenously added HDL has been shown to promote growth of breast cancer cells in vitro and promote aggressiveness of tumors in vivo [1921]. Finally, and vastly extending the functional role that HDL may play in cancer, HDLs also exhibit anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-microbial and pro-immunity properties [22,23] and carry non-lipid components including microRNA, hormones, vitamins and metabolites [24,25].

HDLs possess a core of cholesteryl esters (CE) and triglycerides surrounded by a monolayer of phospholipids and unesterified cholesterol. These 5–12 nm large nanoparticles (NP) are stabilized by Apolipoprotein [26], which influences the lipoprotein’s shape and specific interactions with cellular receptors and transporters including SR-B1, ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABC) A1[1] and ABC-G1 [27]. All three receptors facilitate HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux from cells, but only SR-B1 is known to mediate cholesterol influx. Due to engagement with cholesterol-rich HDLs, the ability to mediate bi-directional cholesterol flux, and its overexpression in multiple cancer types [2,13,1518], SR-B1 has been the most studied HDL receptor in cancer. Also, HDL binding to SR-B1 can trigger downstream signaling cascades, such as through Akt, that promote cancer progression and migration [18]. Apolipoprotein AI (ApoA-I) is the most important and most abundant protein component of HDLs [28]. Due to constant remodeling and maturation through interactions between HDL and other lipoproteins, lipid-modifying enzymes or target cells, HDLs display significant particle heterogeneity with respect to size, density, shape (spherical versus discoidal), associated molecules, chemical composition and surface properties [28]. As such, HDL subclasses belong to a continuous metabolic cascade, which serves a multitude of different functions.

Targeted Drug Delivery to Cancer Cells

Despite significant recent progress, enormous room and need for improvement of current anti-cancer therapeutic options remain [29]. Most standard anti-cancer drugs are inherently non-specific, both in their bio-distribution (diffusing both into healthy and cancer tissues), as well as in their mechanism of action (affecting all rapidly diving cells rather than cancer cells specifically). About 40% of new anti-cancer drugs in the pipeline are characterized by poor water-solubility [30]. Targeted drug delivery has the great potential to overcome these disadvantages: A preferential accumulation of the therapeutic agent in malignant rather than healthy cells significantly improves the therapeutic index of a drug.

Reconstituted HDL nanoparticles have in general been shown to be very biocompatible, and are – due to their targeting of cancer cells – an attractive vehicle for the delivery of antineoplastic substances. In this review we summarize recent scientific advancements in using synthetic, Apolipoprotein or Apo-peptide containing, biomimetic HDL-like nanoparticles (NP) both as efficient delivery vehicles for anticancer drugs, nucleic acids and phototherapeutic compounds, as well as agents that are intrinsically therapeutic.

The preferential accumulation of HDL-like NPs in cancer cells is achieved by passive and active targeting. Tumor tissues are characterized by a leaky vasculature and low lymphatic drainage, leading to differences in interstitial pressure between the center of a tumor and its periphery. This pressure difference allows for the preferential retention of particles between 10–100 nm in the tumor, a passive targeting phenomenon known as the enhanced permeability and retention effect [31,32]. HDL-like NPs can also be actively targeted to cancer cells by specific interaction with SR-B1, which is highly expressed by many different types of cancer [2,13,1518]. Importantly, SR-B1 facilitates the uptake of cholesterol esters and anticancer drugs from spherical HDL-like NPs to the cytosol via a non-endocytic pathway [33,34], avoiding lysosomal degradation of HDL-like NP payload.

Synthetic HDL-like NPs are highly customizable, therefore providing researchers with the unique opportunity to control many of the particles’ structural and compositional features and to endow these particles with tailored and unique functions. For instance, NP can differ in the composition of their core (e.g. cholesterol esters [16] versus inorganic scaffolds [35]), in their shape (discoidal [36] versus spherical [35]), their protein content (full-length Apolipoprotein [37] versus Apo-mimetic peptide[38]), their phospholipid composition [39] and in the nature of the surrounding lipid layer (bilayer [35] versus monolayer [40]). Further, drug-conjugated particles can differ in the mechanism of the drug loading (covalent attachment [41], encapsulation [42] or integration in lipid layer [43]) and the presence or absence of additional targeting moieties [39]. Many HDL-like NPs have been shown to mimic their natural spherical or discoidal counterparts in many characteristics like composition, surface properties and size. Further, many constructs have been found to be non-immunogenic, to avoid clearance by the reticuloendothelial system, and to have relatively long circulation times in the blood stream [31]. In summary, HDL-like NPs may be an effective and biocompatible platform for targeted delivery to cancer cells [44].

Spherical HDL-like NP for Drug Delivery

Delivery of hydrophobic antineoplastic agents by HDL-like NPs is often achieved by encapsulation of the drug in the hydrophobic core. Recently, Lacko and coworkers showed that inclusion of highly water-insoluble drugs like valrubicin in spherical HDL-like NPs composed of phosphatidyl choline, Apo-AI, free cholesterol and cholesteryl oleate led to increased toxicity in SR-B1 expressing, malignant prostate and ovarian cell lines as compared to the free drug [34,45]. Off-target cytotoxic effects in non-malignant epithelial prostate and ovarian cell lines with low SR-B1 expression were decreased for the drug-containing particle compared to the free drug [34,45]. Encapsulation of valrubicin into HDL-like NP therefore has the potential to significantly expand the therapeutic spectrum of the drug, which had previously exclusively been used for treatment of bladder cancer [34]. The authors also used a similar NP construct to target the therapeutic agent fenretinide to two different neuroblastoma cells lines in vitro [45]. Compared to the free drug, cytotoxicity in the malignant cells lines was significantly increased, while cytotoxicity in retinal pigment epithelial cells, a control cells line for off-target fenretinide toxicity, was reduced [34,45]. Feng and coworkers used a similar strategy of drug encapsulation to target doxorubicin to heptocellular carcinoma and hepatoma cells lines [42,46]. Their particles composed of egg phospholipids, Apo-AI and doxorubicin showed increased cytotoxicity, apoptosis rates, and cellular accumulation in target cells compared with the free or liposome encapsulated drug [42]. The drug-loaded HDL-like NPs also decreased tumor growth in a metastatic model of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in nude mice more effectively while reducing hemolysis-related side effects [46].

To better understand the uptake of lipophilic components from HDL-like NPs through SR-B1, Lin et al. developed multifluorophore-labeled, HDL-mimicking peptide phospholipid scaffold (HPPS) nanoparticles [47]. Although ApoA-I is critical for determining the shape of HDLs and allowing for specific interactions with cellular receptors, the protein can be replaced by short (<20 amino acids) peptides that show no sequence similarity to the full-length protein [48]. These peptides mimic the amphipathic helical structure of ApoA-I and receptor and lipid binding abilities [48]. Lin et al. [47] generated a variety of different cholesteryl oleate/phosphocholine HDL-like NPs with either fluorescent compounds in the particle core, fluorescently labeled Apo-peptides and phospholipids on the surface, or combinations thereof. Through sequential inhibition studies, they found that after initial interaction of the NP with SR-B1, the particle bound to a specific sub-domain of the receptor, leading to particle dissociation and internalization of the hydrophobic, fluorescent particle payload into the cytosol by a lipid-raft/caveolae-like mechanism. Phospholipids and Apo-mimetic peptides were mainly retained on the cell surface. For natural, mature HDL, selective influx of the CE payload does not require the catabolism of the particle [49,50], suggesting that the cellular fate of specific HDL-like NPs might be dependent on their specific composition and determined by additional factors that warrant further investigation.

Alternative Targeting Ligands

HDL-like NPs can also serve as scaffolds for the attachment of alternative targeting ligands. Corbin et al. [39,51] exploited the fact that over 90% of non-mucinous ovarian cancers overexpress the folate receptor-α (FR-α) [52]. Covalent linkage of folate to the lysine residues of ApoA-I abolished the particle’s ability to interact with SR-B1, therefore rerouting the HDL-like NP to FR-α. The researchers used this technique to specifically deliver an NP-encapsulated near-infrared fluorescent dye to ovarian tumors in mice, therefore enhancing optical imaging in vivo [39,51]. Current studies are underway to utilize these particles not only for delivery of optical dyes, but for therapeutic antineoplastic agents as well [39].

Discoidal HDL-like NP for Drug Delivery

Both discoidal and spherical HDL-like NPs have been used successfully for the delivery of a large variety of antineoplastic agents. Discoidal HDLs lack a core composed of triglycerides and CE, and it has been suggested that they bind to the SR-B1 receptor with higher affinity than spherical HDLs [53]. However, discoidal species have the disadvantage of being prone to undergo maturation in the blood stream due to interaction with lecithin-cholesterol-acyltransferase (LCAT). LCAT converts the cholesterol present in discoidal HDL into CE, which moves into the center of the particle, increasing the particle’s size and remodeling it into a sphere [54]. This can lead to unwanted leakage of drug cargo [55]. To address this problem, researchers used monocholesterylsuccinate (CHS) instead of cholesterol to prevent particle interaction with LCAT, and further anchored ApoA-I in the particle by covalently linking it to CHS [56,57]. CHS-modified discoidal HDL-like NPs loaded with paclitaxel, a mitotic inhibitor used to treat a variety of cancers, showed improved pharmacokinetics in rats [57], as well as improved targeting, cytotoxicity and limitation of tumor growth in breast cancer tumors compared to the unmodified particle [56]. Ultimately, the choice of whether to use spherical or discoidal HDL-like NPs for drug delivery will depend on the nature of the payload and the type of cancer to be targeted.

Delivery of Nucleic Acids

It has recently been demonstrated that natural HDLs not only associate with small, regulatory nucleic acids like microRNA (miRNA), but are further capable of delivering these molecules to cells in a SR-B1-dependent fashion and of down-regulating gene expression of corresponding miRNA targets [24,58]. Notably, the HDL-miRNA profiles of patients with diseases like familial hypercholesterolemia differ substantially from those of healthy volunteers [24], and miRNA in the serum has been found to be a good indicator for a variety of disease states including cancer [5961], although with some limitations [62]. It has further been suggested that serum miRNA could serve as a mean of cell-cell communication. While the exact biological function of HDL-associated nucleic acids remains to be elucidated, several research groups have already exploited the nucleic acid binding properties of HDL to design HDL-like NPs to target both RNA and DNA to the cytosol of cancer cells. Ding et al. used reconstituted HDL composed of phospholipids, cholesterol, CE and ApoA-I to deliver double stranded, cholesterylated short interfering RNA (chol-siRNA) to hepatocellular carcinoma. These siRNA-NPs were specifically targeted to tumor sites, where they effectively decreased the expression of the oncogenes POKEMON and BCL-2 and inhibited cellular growth [63]. Accumulation of these HDL-like NPs in the target tissues could further be confirmed by using fluorescently labeled chol-siRNA. Rui et al. constructed a HDL-like NP composed of phospholipids, ApoA-I and cholesterol that harbored un-modified siRNA complexed with a cationic polymer in its core [40]. Mediated by an SR-B1-dependent mechanism and with minimal cytotoxicity [40], the construct efficiently silenced the luciferase gene expressed by hepatoma target cells. Similarly, Shahzad et al. used oligolysine peptides to neutralize and complex siRNA, allowing its formulation with a HDL-like NP with similar composition of that of Rui et al. [16,40]. The particle was successfully used to silence the genes for the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, as well as focal adhesion kinase, two proteins involved in malignant cell survival and progression [16,40]. Using multiple tumor mouse models of ovarian cancer and colorectal cancer, the authors showed decreased tumor growth, angiogenesis and cell survival upon siRNA-HDL-like NP treatment [16]. Zheng and coworkers also used their above mentioned HPPS particle [47] to deliver chol-siRNA to cancer cells. Their chol-siRNA-particles successfully down-regulated the BCL-2 gene in mice bearing KB (SR-B1+) tumor xenografts, resulting in increased apoptosis and decreased tumor growth without significant side effects [64]. Further, the additional encapsulation of fluorescent dyes in the core of the HDL-like NP, or the use of dye-labeled siRNA, could serve as valuable tools not only to track the constructs in the body, but also to evaluate different treatment regimens and allow for treatment planning of siRNA delivery to orthotopic tumors [65]. In one of the first demonstrations of a synthetic, biomimetic HDL nanoparticle used for nucleic acid delivery, our research lab has previously developed HDL-like NPs that are based on a core gold nanoparticle scaffold, covered by a lipid bilayer, and stabilized by ApoA-I. Size, shape, cholesterol binding and efflux properties of the HDL-like NP have been shown to be comparable to the ones of natural HDL [35]. We demonstrated that cholesterylated ssDNA (chol-ssDNA) not only adsorbs to the HDL-like NP and is protected from nuclease degradation, but is also effectively delivered to prostate cancer cells, which exhibit a particularly high demand for cholesterol [66]. Our DNA-HDL-like NPs further bypassed endolysosomal sequestration, regulated target gene expression, and could be tracked using transmission electron microscopy [67]. Using a similar HDL-like NP construct, we were also able to deliver ssRNAi to vascular endothelial cells, leading to attenuation of in vivo neovascularization and remarkable reduction in the growth of hypervascular lung tumor allografts [68].

Apolipoproteins

In addition to ApoA-I, ApoE has been used as a targeting moiety for HDL-like NPs. Dong et al. generated an entire library of NPs composed of phospholipids, cholesterol, polyethylene glycol-lipid, siRNA and different lipopeptides – lipids whose tails were conjugated to a diversity of different amino acids, peptides, and polypeptide head groups [69]. When assessing the different particles for their potential to knock down a variety of genes in different tissues, the authors found that their lead construct’s ability to silence the luciferase gene in dual-luciferase–expressing HeLa cells was significantly increased by incubation of the particle with ApoE [69]. ApoE plays a key role in HDL-like NP uptake by the liver through the LDL receptor and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 [70,71]. This Apolipoprotein has also been used by other groups to systematically deliver chol-siRNA conjugated to discoidal HDL-like NP to liver cells with the goal of silencing a number of different genes [37]. These ApoE-conjugated HDL-like NP more efficiently delivered chol-siRNA to hepatocytes compared to ApoA-I-conjugated particles, presumably due to the employment of a different uptake mechanism (LDL receptor for ApoE vs. SR-B1 for ApoA-I) [37].

A systematic approach to understand the bio-distribution, toxicity and potential of ApoE containing NPs to deliver a variety of different compounds was undertaken by Fischer et al. [41]. The authors used three main approaches to conjugate different compounds to their ApoE-containing discoidal HDL-like NPs. Namely, lipids with functionalized head groups (like Ni-chelating lipids for the binding of His-tagged proteins), highly hydrophobic groups like cholesterol that could be covalently linked to the cargo molecule (like chol-ssDNA), and click-chemistry-based covalent conjugation of proteins to a lipophilic moiety embedded in the lipid bilayer. The resulting suite of HDL-like NPs was stable in complex biological fluids and non-cytotoxic in vitro in concentrations up to 320 mg/ml. Administration of the particles in vivo did not cause weight loss, organ specific toxicity or overt immunogenicity. Biodistribution of the particles varied by route of administration, with preferred accumulation of the particles in kidney and liver after i.v., i.p., i.m. and s.c. administration [41].

Photothermal Agents

HDL-like NPs have also been used to for the delivery of photothermal agents. These compounds facilitate infrared light-induced temperature changes in tumor tissues leading to tissue necrosis. Mathew et al. generated an HDL-like NP composed of phosphocholine, ApoA-I fused to a trans-activating transcriptional activator peptide for enhanced cell internalization and a water-insoluble gadolinium bis(naphthalocyanine) sandwich complex as a photothermal compound [72]. Using this particle, the authors achieved photothermal killing of human lung cancer cells in a near infrared light-irradiation-dependent manner. By conjugating pyropheophorbide, a reduced porphyrin, to lysophospholipids, Ng and al created a phototherapeutic, fluorescent pyro-lipid, which self-assembled with ApoA-I into nanodiscs [36]. While fluorescence of the photosynthesizer was quenched in intact particles, particle uptake by SR-B1 transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells led to un-quenching of the fluorescence, likely due to disruption of particle structure. Importantly, the transfected, SR-B1 positive cells exhibited a dose-dependent decrease in survival when treated with 660 nm light, whereas untransfected SR-B1 negative cells neither took up the particles nor were affected by light treatment [36].

Scale up

A challenge for many, but not all, of the HDL-like NPs is the ability to produce particles at the scale required for more extensive studies. Kim et al. [43] presented a microfluidics-based method for the large-scale production of NPs. By manipulating mixing speeds and lipid to protein ratios, the authors were able to fine-tune the production of a variety of HDL-like NPs that differ in shape (discoidal and spherical) and encapsulated compound (such as the drug simvastatin and fluorophores or inorganic cores such as gold, iron oxides and quantum dots for imaging purposes) [43]. This work illustrates how versatile HDL-like NPs are in terms of their range of deliverable compounds. For the use of HDL-like NP as therapeutic agents, cost of the individual components needs to be considered. The most costly component of many of the HDL-like NPs may be the ApoA-I protein; however, significant past work has demonstrated the scale-up and use of ApoA-I in human clinical trials [7375]. In addition, alternative approaches, like the use of ApoA-I-mimetic peptides, have been explored as well [31].

Nanoparticles as Intrinsically Therapeutic Agents

Some HDL-like NP constructs are intrinsically therapeutic without requiring a cargo. Zheng et al. found that their SR-B1-targeted HDL-like NP named HPPS, which the authors had previously loaded with various compounds like antineoplastic agents, siRNA and photosensitizers [47,64,65,76] also inhibited motility and colony formation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells in vitro without carrying any cargo [38].The cargo-free HPPS particles further decreased tumor growth in nude mice bearing NPC subcutaneous tumors through a mechanism that involved neither tumor cell necrosis nor apoptosis [38]. While ApoA-I-mimetic peptides like the one on the HPPS NP have been shown to exhibit anti-tumor activities by reducing plasma levels of lysophosphatidic acid, a stimulator of cell migration, invasion and colony formation [77], the exact mechanism of action for HPPS particles is still unknown. In an alternative approach, our lab has successfully used HDL particles with a core made of gold [67,68], rather than CE, to selectively induce apoptosis in lymphoma cells [78]. Since the surface properties of our HDL-like NPs are similar to the ones of natural HDL, they compete for SR-B1 binding sites on cancer cells, and upon binding, selectively modulate cholesterol homeostasis. This ultimately leads to lymphoma cell apoptosis. Treatment of mice bearing B-cell lymphoma xenografts with HDL-like NP selectively inhibits B cell lymphoma growth. This suggests that our HDL-like NPs can not only be used for the delivery of nucleic acid cargoes [67], but are also intrinsically therapeutic agents due to an apparent cooperative effect that results from biomimicry and targeted alteration of cellular cholesterol homeostasis in B cell lymphoma [78].

Expert commentary

In conclusion, a significant body of data exists demonstrating that HDL-like NPs actively target cancer cells through receptor-mediated interactions and constitute a highly versatile, non-toxic delivery platform for a variety of different of antineoplastic compounds, nucleic acids and photothermal agents. Additionally, certain HDL-like NPs may also serve as functional, single-entity therapies for cancer based upon the particles’ ability to differentially modulate cellular cholesterol flux. Lastly, HDL-like NPs can be equipped with fluorescent dyes and imaging agents, allowing tracking of the particles in the human body and allowing further investigation of the structure-function relationships of HDLs and HDL-like particles. The mechanism by which HDL-delivered therapeutic agents may slow tumor progression is likely to be a combination of drug targeting and the intrinsic antineoplastic properties of both the drug cargo and the HDL-like NP carrier. Moreover, ApoA-I, a major component of many of the HDL-like constructs presented here, has been shown to reduce both tumor growth and metastasis and can even lead to tumor regression [79]. Finally, due to the close connection of cancer and inflammation, the anti-inflammatory properties of HDL could play a role in HDL-based cancer therapy as well [23,80]. In summary, further pre-clinical and clinical development of these new approaches may offer tremendous new therapeutic opportunities for patients with cancer.

Five-year view

Due to the beneficial properties of HDL-like NPs as drug and nucleic acid delivery vehicles and as targeted single-entity therapies, drugs based on novel synthetic forms of HDL have the potential to be studied in early phase clinical trials. First-generation studies are likely to focus on the lymphoproliferative disorders where robust preclinical data have been generated. Since HDL-like NPs will eventually be targeted to the liver for excretion in the bile, the potential side effects of HDL-like NP-based therapies related to liver toxicity will certainly be examined in closer detail. However, several studies already suggest that HDL-like NPs do not display significant adverse effect in liver function and hepatocyte viability and have overall a very limited bio-toxicity [41,78,81]. Further, many HDL-like NPs are amenable to being scaled up for production as necessary for large clinical trials [43,78], ApoA-I has been scaled up and administered to humans in clinical trials [7375], and alternatives to ApoA-I, like ApoA-I-mimetic peptides, have also been explored [31]. HDL-like NPs have great potential to display maximum clinical efficacy in the near future and provide paradigm shifting new approaches and therapies for cancer patients. Further insights into the modes of action of, and mechanisms of resistance to, HDL-like NP will refine the types of cancer, anti-cancer entities carried, and companion agents/approaches used in clinical studies.

Key issues.

  • High density lipoproteins (HDL) are natural nanoparticles that transport cholesterol to cancer cells and can, through receptor-mediated interactions, trigger downstream signaling cascades that promote cancer progression and migration.

  • Synthetic forms of HDL (HDL-like NP) have been developed to target anticancer drugs, nucleic acids and phototherapeutic compounds to cancer cells.

  • New forms of HDL-like NP have been shown to serve as intrinsically therapeutic agents that can differentially modulate cellular cholesterol homeostasis, therefore serving as potent cancer therapies for some types of cancer, including lymphoma.

  • The production of recombinant forms of HDLs can be scaled to allow the conduct of human clinical trials.

Acknowledgements

CS Thaxton would like to thank the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) for a Physician-Scientist Early Career Award, grant funding from the Department of Defense/Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA95501310192), and grant funding from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (U54CA151880 and R01CA167041).

List of abbreviations

ABC

ATP-binding cassette transporter

ApoA-I

Apolipoprotein AI

ApoE

Apolipoprotein E

CE

Cholesteryl ester

chol-siRNA

Cholesterylated short interfering RNA

chol-ssDNA

Cholesterylated ssDNA

CHS

Monocholesterylsuccinate

FR

Folate receptor

HCC

Human hepatocellular carcinoma

HDL

High density lipoprotein

HPPS

HDL-mimicking peptide phospholipid scaffold

i.m.

Intramuscular

i.p.

Intraperitoneal

i.v.

Intravenous

LCAT

Lecithin-cholesterol-acyltransferase

LDL

Low density lipoprotein

miRNA

microRNA

NP

Nanoparticle

NPC

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

s.c.

Subcutaneous

SR-B1

Scavenger receptor B1

Footnotes

Financial & competing interests disclosure

CS Thaxton is a founder of AuraSense and AuraSense Therapeutics. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as:

* of interest

** of considerable interest

  • 1. Cruz PM, Mo H, McConathy WJ, Sabnis N, Lacko AG. The role of cholesterol metabolism and cholesterol transport in carcinogenesis: a review of scientific findings, relevant to future cancer therapeutics. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2013;4:119. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00119. **An informative review detailing the role of cholesterol in cancer.
  • 2.Gorin A, Gabitova L, Astsaturov I. Regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis and cancer signaling. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2012;12(6):710–716. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2012.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown AJ. Cholesterol, statins and cancer. Clin Exp Pharmacol P. 2007;34(3):135–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simons K, Ikonen E. How cells handle cholesterol. Science. 2000;290(5497):1721–1726. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simons K, Gerl MJ. Revitalizing membrane rafts: new tools and insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2010;11(10):688–699. doi: 10.1038/nrm2977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clendening JW, Pandyra A, Boutros PC, et al. Dysregulation of the mevalonate pathway promotes transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(34):15051–15056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910258107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ginestier C, Monville F, Wicinski J, et al. Mevalonate metabolism regulates Basal breast cancer stem cells and is a potential therapeutic target. Stem cells. 2012;30(7):1327–1337. doi: 10.1002/stem.1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A Receptor-Mediated Pathway for Cholesterol Homeostasis. Science. 1986;232(4746):34–47. doi: 10.1126/science.3513311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olson RE. Discovery of the lipoproteins, their role in fat transport and their significance as risk factors. J Nutr. 1998;128(2):439s–443s. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.2.439S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chapman MJ. Animal lipoproteins: chemistry, structure, and comparative aspects. Journal of lipid research. 1980;21(7):789–853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fiorenza AM, Branchi A, Sommariva D. Serum lipoprotein profile in patients with cancer. A comparison with non-cancer subjects. International journal of clinical & laboratory research. 2000;30(3):141–145. doi: 10.1007/s005990070013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mehta R, Gurudath S, Dayansoor S, Pai A, Ganapathy KS. Serum lipid profile in patients with oral cancer and oral precancerous conditions. Dental research journal. 2014;11(3):345–350. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.135889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Muntoni S, Atzori L, Mereu R, et al. Serum lipoproteins and cancer. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD. 2009;19(3):218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Niendorf A, Nagele H, Gerding D, Meyer-Pannwitt U, Gebhardt A. Increased LDL receptor mRNA expression in colon cancer is correlated with a rise in plasma cholesterol levels after curative surgery. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer. 1995;61(4):461–464. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910610405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leon CG, Locke JA, Adomat HH, et al. Alterations in cholesterol regulation contribute to the production of intratumoral androgens during progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer in a mouse xenograft model. The Prostate. 2010;70(4):390–400. doi: 10.1002/pros.21072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shahzad MMK, Mangala LS, Han HD, et al. Targeted Delivery of Small Interfering RNA Using Reconstituted High-Density Lipoprotein Nanoparticles. Neoplasia. 2011;13(4):309–U142. doi: 10.1593/neo.101372. *One of the first mansucripts to describe the use of HDLs for nucleic acid delivery.
  • 17.Llaverias G, Danilo C, Mercier I, et al. Role of cholesterol in the development and progression of breast cancer. The American journal of pathology. 2011;178(1):402–412. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Danilo C, Gutierrez-Pajares JL, Mainieri MA, Mercier I, Lisanti MP, Frank PG. Scavenger receptor class B type I regulates cellular cholesterol metabolism and cell signaling associated with breast cancer development. Breast cancer research : BCR. 2013;15(5):R87. doi: 10.1186/bcr3483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rotheneder M, Kostner GM. Effects of low- and high-density lipoproteins on the proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro: differences between hormone-dependent and hormone-independent cell lines. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer. 1989;43(5):875–879. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910430523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Uda S, Accossu S, Spolitu S, et al. A lipoprotein source of cholesteryl esters is essential for proliferation of CEM-CCRF lymphoblastic cell line. Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2012;33(2):443–453. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0270-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Danilo C, Frank PG. Cholesterol and breast cancer development. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2012;12(6):677–682. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Navab M, Reddy ST, Van Lenten BJ, Anantharamaiah GM, Fogelman AM. The role of dysfunctional HDL in atherosclerosis. Journal of lipid research. 2009;(50 Suppl):S145–S149. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800036-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eren E, Yilmaz N, Aydin O. High Density Lipoprotein and it's Dysfunction. The open biochemistry journal. 2012;6:78–93. doi: 10.2174/1874091X01206010078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Vickers KC, Palmisano BT, Shoucri BM, Shamburek RD, Remaley AT. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high-density lipoproteins. Nature cell biology. 2011;13(4):423–433. doi: 10.1038/ncb2210. *This manuscript demonstrates, for the first time, that natural HDLs bind, stabilize, and transport microRNAs.
  • 25.Vickers KC, Remaley AT. Functional diversity of HDL cargo. Journal of lipid research. 2013 jlr. R035964. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jonas A, Phillips MC. Lipoprotein structure. N Comp Bioc. 2008:485–506. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oram JF, Vaughan AM. ATP-Binding cassette cholesterol transporters and cardiovascular disease. Circulation research. 2006;99(10):1031–1043. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000250171.54048.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Asztalos BF, Tani M, Schaefer EJ. Metabolic and functional relevance of HDL subspecies. Current opinion in lipidology. 2011;22(3):176–185. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283468061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aslan B, Ozpolat B, Sood AK, Lopez-Berestein G. Nanotechnology in cancer therapy. Journal of drug targeting. 2013;21(10):904–913. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2013.837469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery. Acs Nano. 2009;3(1):16–20. doi: 10.1021/nn900002m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sabnis N, Lacko AG. Drug delivery via lipoprotein-based carriers: answering the challenges in systemic therapeutics. Therapeutic delivery. 2012;3(5):599–608. doi: 10.4155/tde.12.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huynh E, Zheng G. Engineering multifunctional nanoparticles: all-in-one versus one-for-all. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. 2013;5(3):250–265. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ng KK, Lovell JF, Zheng G. Lipoprotein-Inspired Nanoparticles for Cancer Theranostics. Accounts Chem Res. 2011;44(10):1105–1113. doi: 10.1021/ar200017e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sabnis N, Nair M, Israel M, McConathy WJ, Lacko AG. Enhanced solubility and functionality of valrubicin (AD-32) against cancer cells upon encapsulation into biocompatible nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:975–983. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S28029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Luthi AJ, Zhang H, Kim D, Giljohann DA, Mirkin CA, Thaxton CS. Tailoring of biomimetic high-density lipoprotein nanostructures changes cholesterol binding and efflux. Acs Nano. 2012;6(1):276–285. doi: 10.1021/nn2035457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ng KK, Lovell JF, Vedadi A, Hajian T, Zheng G. Self-Assembled Porphyrin Nanodiscs with Structure-Dependent Activation for Phototherapy and Photodiagnostic Applications. Acs Nano. 2013;7(4):3484–3490. doi: 10.1021/nn400418y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nakayama T, Butler JS, Sehgal A, et al. Harnessing a physiologic mechanism for siRNA delivery with mimetic lipoprotein particles. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2012;20(8):1582–1589. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng Y, Liu YY, Jin HL, et al. Scavenger Receptor B1 is a Potential Biomarker of Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Its Growth is Inhibited by HDL-mimetic Nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2013;3(7):477–486. doi: 10.7150/thno.6617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Corbin IR, Ng KK, Ding L, Jurisicova A, Zheng G. Near-infrared fluorescent imaging of metastatic ovarian cancer using folate receptor-targeted high-density lipoprotein nanocarriers. Nanomedicine. 2013;8(6):875–890. doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rui MJ, Tang HL, Li Y, Wei XH, Xu YH. Recombinant High Density Lipoprotein Nanoparticles for Target-Specific Delivery of siRNA. Pharmaceutical research. 2013;30(5):1203–1214. doi: 10.1007/s11095-012-0957-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Fischer NO, Weilhammer DR, Dunkle A, et al. Evaluation of Nanolipoprotein Particles (NLPs) as an In Vivo Delivery Platform. PloS one. 2014;9(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093342. *A comprehensive analysis of variations of nanoparticle synthesis and conjugation chemistries is presented. In addition, the authors investigate the toxicity profile of recombinant HDLs.
  • 42.Wang BL, Yuan Y, Han L, Ye L, Shi XL, Feng MQ. Recombinant lipoproteins reinforce cytotoxicity of doxorubicin to hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of drug targeting. 2014;22(1):76–85. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2013.839687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kim Y, Fay F, Cormode DP, et al. Single step reconstitution of multifunctional high-density lipoprotein-derived nanomaterials using microfluidics. Acs Nano. 2013;7(11):9975–9983. doi: 10.1021/nn4039063. *This paper shows a microfluidic platform for the scale-up and manufacturing of a variety of synthetic HDLs.
  • 44.Bricarello DA, Smilowitz JT, Zivkovic AM, German JB, Parikh AN. Reconstituted Lipoprotein: A Versatile Class of Biologically-Inspired Nanostructures. Acs Nano. 2011;5(1):42–57. doi: 10.1021/nn103098m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sabnis N, Pratap S, Akopova I, Bowman PW, Lacko AG. Pre-Clinical Evaluation of rHDL Encapsulated Retinoids for the Treatment of Neuroblastoma. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2013;1:6. doi: 10.3389/fped.2013.00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yuan Y, Wang WN, Wang BL, Zhu HY, Zhang BH, Feng MQ. Delivery of hydrophilic drug doxorubicin hydrochloride-targeted liver using apoAI as carrier. Journal of drug targeting. 2013;21(4):367–374. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2012.757769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lin Q, Chen J, Ng KK, Cao W, Zhang Z, Zheng G. Imaging the Cytosolic Drug Delivery Mechanism of HDL-Like Nanoparticles. Pharmaceutical research. 2013;31(6):1438–1449. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1046-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Reddy ST, Navab M, Anantharamaiah GM, Fogelman AM. Searching for a successful HDL-based treatment strategy. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2014;1841(1):162–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Knecht TP, Pittman RC. A Plasma-Membrane Pool of Cholesteryl Esters That May Mediate the Selective Uptake of Cholesteryl Esters from High-Density Lipoproteins. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1989;1002(3):365–375. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(89)90351-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pittman RC, Knecht TP, Rosenbaum MS, Taylor CA. A Nonendocytotic Mechanism for the Selective Uptake of High-Density Lipoprotein-Associated Cholesterol Esters. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1987;262(6):2443–2450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Corbin IR. Ligand-coupled lipoprotein for ovarian cancer-specific drug delivery. Methods in molecular biology. 2013;1049:467–480. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-547-7_35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kalli KR, Oberg AL, Keeney GL, et al. Folate receptor alpha as a tumor target in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(3):619–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liadaki KN, Liu T, Xu S, et al. Binding of high density lipoprotein (HDL) and discoidal reconstituted HDL to the HDL receptor scavenger receptor class B type I. Effect of lipid association and APOA-I mutations on receptor binding. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275(28):21262–21271. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002310200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rader DJ. Molecular regulation of HDL metabolism and function: implications for novel therapies. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(12):3090–3100. doi: 10.1172/JCI30163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jia JT, Xiao Y, Liu JP, et al. Preparation, characterizations, and in vitro metabolic processes of paclitaxel-loaded discoidal recombinant high-density lipoproteins. J Pharm Sci-Us. 2012;101(8):2900–2908. doi: 10.1002/jps.23210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang J, Jia JT, Liu JP, He HL, Zhang WL, Li ZH. Tumor targeting effects of a novel modified paclitaxel-loaded discoidal mimic high density lipoproteins. Drug Deliv. 2013;20(8):356–363. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2013.834418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang M, Jia J, Liu J, He H, Liu L. A novel modified paclitaxel-loaded discoidal recombinant high-density lipoproteins: Preparation, characterizations and in vivo evaluation. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2013;8(1):11–18. doi: 10.1002/jps.23210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wagner J, Riwanto M, Besler C, et al. Characterization of levels and cellular transfer of circulating lipoprotein-bound microRNAs. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2013;33(6):1392–1400. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell research. 2008;18(10):997–1006. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rayner KJ, Hennessy EJ. Extracellular communication via microRNA: lipid particles have a new message. Journal of lipid research. 2013;54(5):1174–1181. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R034991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen X, Liang H, Zhang J, Zen K, Zhang CY. Horizontal transfer of microRNAs: molecular mechanisms and clinical applications. Protein & cell. 2012;3(1):28–37. doi: 10.1007/s13238-012-2003-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pritchard CC, Kroh E, Wood B, et al. Blood cell origin of circulating microRNAs: a cautionary note for cancer biomarker studies. Cancer prevention research. 2012;5(3):492–497. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ding Y, Wang W, Feng MQ, et al. A biomimetic nanovector-mediated targeted cholesterol-conjugated siRNA delivery for tumor gene therapy. Biomaterials. 2012;33(34):8893–8905. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lin QY, Chen J, Jin HL, et al. Efficient systemic delivery of siRNA by using high-density lipoprotein-mimicking peptide lipid nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2012;7(12):1813–1825. doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lin Q, Jin CS, Huang H, et al. Nanoparticle-Enabled, Image-Guided Treatment Planning of Target Specific RNAi Therapeutics in an Orthotopic Prostate Cancer Model. Small. 2014;10(15):3072–3082. doi: 10.1002/smll.201303842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Krycer JR, Brown AJ. Cholesterol accumulation in prostate cancer: a classic observation from a modern perspective. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1835(2):219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. McMahon KM, Mutharasan RK, Tripathy S, et al. Biomimetic high density lipoprotein nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery. Nano letters. 2011;11(3):1208–1214. doi: 10.1021/nl1041947. **One of the first synthetic HDL NP platforms shown to bind, stabilize, and deliver nucleic acids to target cancer cells. In addition, data support the notion that nucleic acids delivered on the HDL NP platform bypass endolysosomal sequestration.
  • 68.Tripathy S, Vinokour E, McMahon KM, Volpert OV, Thaxton CS. High-Density Lipoprotein Nanoparticles Deliver RNAi to Endothelial Cells to Inhibit Angiogenesis. Part Part Syst Charact. 2014;31(11):1141–1150. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201400036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dong Y, Love KT, Dorkin JR, et al. Lipopeptide nanoparticles for potent and selective siRNA delivery in rodents and nonhuman primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(11):3955–3960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322937111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mahley RW, Huang Y. Apolipoprotein E: from atherosclerosis to Alzheimer's disease and beyond. Current opinion in lipidology. 1999;10(3):207–217. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199906000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Van Eck M, Van Dijk KW, Herijgers N, Hofker MH, Groot PH, Van Berkel TJ. Essential role for the (hepatic) LDL receptor in macrophage apolipoprotein E-induced reduction in serum cholesterol levels and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2001;154(1):103–112. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00471-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mathew S, Murakami T, Nakatsuji H, et al. Exclusive Photothermal Heat Generation by a Gadolinium Bis(naphthalocyanine) Complex and Inclusion into Modified High-Density Lipoprotein Nanocarriers for Therapeutic Applications. Acs Nano. 2013;7(10):8908–8916. doi: 10.1021/nn403384k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nissen SE, Tsunoda T, Tuzcu EM, et al. Effect of recombinant ApoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2003;290(17):2292–2300. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.17.2292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Easton R, Gille A, D'Andrea D, Davis R, Wright SD, Shear C. A multiple ascending dose study of CSL112, an infused formulation of ApoA-I. Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2014;54(3):301–310. doi: 10.1002/jcph.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Keyserling CH, Hunt TL, Klepp HM, et al. CER-001, a Synthetic HDL-Mimetic, Safely Mobilizes Cholesterol in Healthy Dyslipidemic Volunteers. Circulation. 2011;124(21) [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang Z, Cao W, Jin H, et al. Biomimetic nanocarrier for direct cytosolic drug delivery. Angewandte Chemie. 2009;48(48):9171–9175. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Su F, Grijalva V, Navab K, et al. HDL Mimetics Inhibit Tumor Development in Both Induced and Spontaneous Mouse Models of Colon Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(6):1311–1319. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Yang S, Damiano MG, Zhang H, et al. Biomimetic, synthetic HDL nanostructures for lymphoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(7):2511–2516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213657110. **This manuscript shows the inherent therapeutic potential of HDL NPs for the treatment of lymphoma. Uniquely, the mechanism of action is dependent on both biomimetic surface chemistry and the presence of the gold nanoparticle scaffold used to synthesize the HDL NPs.
  • 79.Zamanian-Daryoush M, Lindner D, Tallant TC, et al. The cardioprotective protein apolipoprotein A1 promotes potent anti-tumorigenic effects. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288(29):21237–21252. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.468967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rayburn ER, Ezell SJ, Zhang R. Anti-Inflammatory Agents for Cancer Therapy. Molecular and cellular pharmacology. 2009;1(1):29–43. doi: 10.4255/mcpharmacol.09.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yang M, Chen J, Cao W, et al. Attenuation of nontargeted cell-kill using a high-density lipoprotein-mimicking peptide--phospholipid nanoscaffold. Nanomedicine. 2011;6(4):631–641. doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES