Several small uncontrolled retrospective case series as well as a post-hoc analysis of the registration trial for temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (Weller et al., 2011) have indicated an association between valproic acid (VPA) use and improved outcome in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To confirm the hypothesis generated based on the analysis of the temozolomide registration trial, we performed a combined analysis of a survival association of AED use at the start of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in the pooled patient cohort (n = 1869) of four contemporary randomized clinical trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: AVAGlio (NCT00943826), RTOG-0825 (NCT00884741), CENTRIC (NCT00689221) and CORE (NCT00813943). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between (i) VPA versus no AED, (ii) VPA versus enzyme-inducing (EI)-AED, or (iii) VPA versus other non-EI-AED (without VPA). Results of Cox regression models stratified by trial and adjusted baseline prognostic factors including O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status were interpreted. The same analyses were performed with levetiracetam (LEV). VPA use at the start of chemoradiotherapy was not associated with improved PFS or OS compared with patients receiving no AED (PFS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.13, p = 0.41; OS: HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.80-1.25, p = 0.95), EI-AED (PFS: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.74-1.21, p = 0.62; OS: HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.0.77-1.33, p = 0.93) or non-EI-AED (PFS: HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.80-1.3, p = 0.92; OS: HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.35, p = 0.67). Similarly, no association with outcome was seen for LEV use. This pooled analysis did not validate an association of VPA or LEV use with improved survival, challenging the need for a full phase III trial exploring the repurposing of VPA or LEV as add-on to the standard of care treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
. 2015 Nov 9;17(Suppl 5):v12. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov205.10
ATNT-10: DOES VALPROIC ACID IMPROVE SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA? A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA
Caroline Happold
1, Thierry Gorlia
2, Olivier Chinot
3, Mark Gilbert
4, Burt Nabors
5, Wolfgang Wick
6, Stephanie L Pugh
7, Monika Hegi
8, Timothy Cloughesy
9, Patrick Roth
1, David Reardon
10, James R Perry
11, Minesh Mehta
12, Roger Stupp
13, Michael Weller
1
Caroline Happold
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Find articles by Caroline Happold
Olivier Chinot
3Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique–Hopitaux de Marseille, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Timone, Marseille, France
Find articles by Olivier Chinot
Mark Gilbert
4University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Find articles by Mark Gilbert
Wolfgang Wick
6Neurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg & German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
Find articles by Wolfgang Wick
Stephanie L Pugh
7NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Find articles by Stephanie L Pugh
Monika Hegi
8Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Find articles by Monika Hegi
Timothy Cloughesy
9UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Find articles by Timothy Cloughesy
Patrick Roth
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Find articles by Patrick Roth
David Reardon
10Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Center for Neuro-Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
Find articles by David Reardon
James R Perry
11Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Find articles by James R Perry
Minesh Mehta
12University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Find articles by Minesh Mehta
Roger Stupp
13Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Find articles by Roger Stupp
Michael Weller
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Find articles by Michael Weller
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2EORTC Data Centre, Brussels, Belgium
3Aix-Marseille University, Assistance Publique–Hopitaux de Marseille, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Timone, Marseille, France
4University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
5University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
6Neurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg & German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
7NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
8Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
9UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
10Dana-Farber Cancer Institute - Center for Neuro-Oncology, Boston, MA, USA
11Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
12University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
13Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Issue date 2015 Nov.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology 2015.
PMCID: PMC4638532
