Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2015 Nov 9;17(Suppl 5):v12. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov205.10

ATNT-10: DOES VALPROIC ACID IMPROVE SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA? A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

Caroline Happold 1, Thierry Gorlia 2, Olivier Chinot 3, Mark Gilbert 4, Burt Nabors 5, Wolfgang Wick 6, Stephanie L Pugh 7, Monika Hegi 8, Timothy Cloughesy 9, Patrick Roth 1, David Reardon 10, James R Perry 11, Minesh Mehta 12, Roger Stupp 13, Michael Weller 1
PMCID: PMC4638532

Several small uncontrolled retrospective case series as well as a post-hoc analysis of the registration trial for temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (Weller et al., 2011) have indicated an association between valproic acid (VPA) use and improved outcome in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To confirm the hypothesis generated based on the analysis of the temozolomide registration trial, we performed a combined analysis of a survival association of AED use at the start of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in the pooled patient cohort (n = 1869) of four contemporary randomized clinical trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: AVAGlio (NCT00943826), RTOG-0825 (NCT00884741), CENTRIC (NCT00689221) and CORE (NCT00813943). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between (i) VPA versus no AED, (ii) VPA versus enzyme-inducing (EI)-AED, or (iii) VPA versus other non-EI-AED (without VPA). Results of Cox regression models stratified by trial and adjusted baseline prognostic factors including O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status were interpreted. The same analyses were performed with levetiracetam (LEV). VPA use at the start of chemoradiotherapy was not associated with improved PFS or OS compared with patients receiving no AED (PFS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.13, p = 0.41; OS: HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.80-1.25, p = 0.95), EI-AED (PFS: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.74-1.21, p = 0.62; OS: HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.0.77-1.33, p = 0.93) or non-EI-AED (PFS: HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.80-1.3, p = 0.92; OS: HR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.35, p = 0.67). Similarly, no association with outcome was seen for LEV use. This pooled analysis did not validate an association of VPA or LEV use with improved survival, challenging the need for a full phase III trial exploring the repurposing of VPA or LEV as add-on to the standard of care treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES