Abstract
BACKGROUND: A table of the approximate ranges of inspired oxygen delivered at given oxygen flow rates is often given on the packaging of oxygen masks. A study was carried out to check the inspired oxygen concentration given by one of the new masks, which has been designed to be used with or without the Venturi attachment as a result of the proposal to use it without the Venturi attachment as a general purpose mask for emergency use. METHODS: Measurements were made at resting respiratory rate and 26 breaths/min in 12 normal subjects. Continuous oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations were recorded at the lips with a mass spectrometer, and inspired oxygen concentrations were calculated from end tidal values by means of the alveolar gas equation. Measurements were made at oxygen flow rates of 2, 4, and 6 l/min for the mask alone and at 2 and 4 l/min with both the 24% and the 28% Venturi attachments. RESULTS: Without the Venturi attachment the mask gave average inspired oxygen concentrations 8-10% greater than are stated on the packaging at oxygen flow rates of 2, 4, and 6 l/min at resting respiratory rates of 8-20 breaths/min, some individuals receiving 30% more than expected. Addition of the interchangeable Venturi attachments designed to give 24% and 28% inspired oxygen delivered average concentrations within 2% of the expected concentrations, no individual receiving more than 5% above the expected concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The labelling on the packaging of oxygen masks may lead to inappropriate use by those not expert in prescribing oxygen therapy. Caution is still needed when a single multipurpose mask is being selected for emergency use, where accurate delivery of low concentrations of oxygen is vital for some patients.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bethune D. W., Collis J. M. An evaluation of oxygen therapy equipment. Experimental study of various devices on the human subject. Thorax. 1967 May;22(3):221–225. doi: 10.1136/thx.22.3.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell E. J. The J. Burns Amberson Lecture. The management of acute respiratory failure in chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1967 Oct;96(4):626–639. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1967.96.4.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies R. J., Hopkin J. M. Nasal oxygen in exacerbations of ventilatory failure: an underappreciated risk. BMJ. 1989 Jul 1;299(6690):43–44. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6690.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green I. D. Choice of method for administration of oxygen. Br Med J. 1967 Sep 2;3(5565):593–596. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5565.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUTCHISON D. C., FLENLEY D. C., DONALD K. W. CONTROLLED OXYGEN THERAPY IN RESPIRATORY FAILURE. Br Med J. 1964 Nov 7;2(5418):1159–1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5418.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill S. L., Barnes P. K., Hollway T., Tennant R. Fixed performance oxygen masks: an evaluation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Apr 28;288(6426):1261–1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6426.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeffrey A. A., Ray S., Douglas N. J. Accuracy of inpatient oxygen administration. Thorax. 1989 Dec;44(12):1036–1037. doi: 10.1136/thx.44.12.1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leigh J. M. Variation in performance of oxygen therapy devices. Towards the rational employment of 'The dephlogisticated air described by Priestley'. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1973 Apr;52(4):234–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren P. M., Flenley D. C., Millar J. S., Avery A. Respiratory failure revisited: acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis between 1961-68 and 1970-76. Lancet. 1980 Mar 1;1(8166):467–470. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]