INTRODUCTION: Following progression after first-line therapies, patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown antitumor activity in patients with several types of solid tumors and also in preclinical glioma models. The Phase 1 portion of CHECKMATE-143 was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint pathway, as monotherapy and in combination with ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits CTLA-4, in patients with a first recurrence of GBM. All patients in Cohort 1 had prior surgical resection, radiation, and temozolomide. Median age was 57 years (range: 37–73), and KPS ≥70. Preliminary results from the study were previously presented and showed nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg was well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM, with no reported treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs). Nivolumab 1 mg/kg in combination with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was associated with a higher incidence of treatment-related grade 3 (n = 7/10) and grade 4 AEs (n = 2/10). Histopathologic and neuroimaging detected antitumor activity within the tumor site, and the preliminary overall survival (OS) rate at 9 months was 6/10 for both the monotherapy and combination arms. METHODS: Patients (n = 20) were randomized 1:1 to receive either nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W or nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Q3W followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W. Eligible patients had no prior bevacizumab treatment and Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. RESULTS: This report will provide updated follow-up data including safety and OS at 12 months.
. 2015 Nov 9;17(Suppl 5):v107. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov218.03
IMCT-03: SAFETY AND ACTIVITY OF NIVOLUMAB MONOTHERAPY AND NIVOLUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH IPILIMUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: UPDATED RESULTS FROM CHECKMATE-143
John Sampson
1, Antonio Omuro
2, Gordana Vlahovic
1, Solmaz Sahebjam
3, Joachim Baehring
4, David A Hafler
4, Alfredo Voloschin
5, Jason Simon
6, Robert Latek
6, Vlad Coric
6, Timothy Cloughesy
7, Michael Lim
8, David Reardon
9
Antonio Omuro
2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Find articles by Antonio Omuro
Alfredo Voloschin
5Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
Find articles by Alfredo Voloschin
Timothy Cloughesy
7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Find articles by Timothy Cloughesy
David Reardon
9Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Find articles by David Reardon
1Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
2Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
3Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
4Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
5Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
6Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
8The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
9Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
Issue date 2015 Nov.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology 2015.
PMCID: PMC4638899
