Immunotherapy represents a promising area of therapy among neuro-oncology patients. However, early phase studies reveal unique challenges associated with assessment of radiological changes reflecting delayed responses or therapy-induced inflammation. Clinical benefit, including long-term survival and tumor regression, can still occur following initial apparent progression or appearance of new lesions. Refinement of response assessment criteria for neuro-oncology patients undergoing immunotherapy is therefore warranted. A multinational and multidisciplinary panel of neuro-oncology immunotherapy experts describes immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology (iRANO) criteria that are based on guidance for determination of tumor progression outlined by the immune-related response criteria (irRC) and the response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) working group. Among patients who demonstrate imaging findings meeting RANO criteria for progressive disease (PD) within six months of initiating immunotherapy including the development of new lesions, confirmation of radiographic progression on follow-up imaging is recommended provided that the patient is not significantly worse clinically. The proposed criteria also include guidelines for use of corticosteroids. The role of advanced imaging techniques and measurement of clinical benefit endpoints including neurologic and immunologic functions are reviewed. The iRANO guidelines put forth herein will evolve successively to improve their utility as further experience from immunotherapy trials in neuro-oncology accumulate.
. 2015 Nov 9;17(Suppl 5):v166–v167. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov225.56
NIMG-56: IMMUNOTHERAPY RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN NEURO-ONCOLOGY (iRANO): A REPORT OF THE RANO WORKING GROUP
Hideho Okada
1, Michael Weller
2, Raymond Huang
3, Gaetano Finocchiaro
4, Mark Gilbert
5, Wolfgang Wick
6, Benjamin Ellingson
7, Naoya Hashimoto
8, Ian Pollack
9, Alba Brandes
10, Enrico Franceschi
10, Christel Herold-Mende
11, Lakshmi Nayak
12, Ashok Panigrahy
9, Whitney Pope
7, Robert Prins
7, John Sampson
13, Patrick Wen
12, David Reardon
12
Hideho Okada
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Find articles by Hideho Okada
Benjamin Ellingson
7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Find articles by Benjamin Ellingson
Naoya Hashimoto
8Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
Find articles by Naoya Hashimoto
Alba Brandes
10Azienda USL–IRCCS Institute of Neurological Science, Bologna, Italy
Find articles by Alba Brandes
Enrico Franceschi
10Azienda USL–IRCCS Institute of Neurological Science, Bologna, Italy
Find articles by Enrico Franceschi
Christel Herold-Mende
11University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Find articles by Christel Herold-Mende
Whitney Pope
7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Find articles by Whitney Pope
Robert Prins
7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Find articles by Robert Prins
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
2University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Germany
3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
4Istituto Neurologico Besta, Milan, Italy
5National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
6Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
7University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
8Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
9University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
10Azienda USL–IRCCS Institute of Neurological Science, Bologna, Italy
11University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
12Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
13Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Issue date 2015 Nov.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology 2015.
PMCID: PMC4639079
