Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1992 Oct;47(10):804–808. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.10.804

Repeatability of methacholine challenge in asthmatic children measured by change in transcutaneous oxygen tension.

S B Phagoo 1, N M Wilson 1, M Silverman 1
PMCID: PMC464053  PMID: 1481181

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The airway response to bronchial provocation may be evaluated by monitoring the fall in transcutaneous oxygen tension (PtcO2) but the repeatability of this method has not been rigorously assessed. METHODS: To determine the repeatability of this indirect method of assessment, bronchial challenge was performed with methacholine in nine children with stable asthma (age range 6-12 years) and was repeated 24 hours later. The response was determined by the fall both in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and in PtcO2. A modified tidal inhalation protocol was used in which quadrupling concentrations of methacholine were given, thereby reducing the time taken for the full challenge by almost half. The concentrations of methacholine that provoked a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20FEV1) and 15% and 10% falls in PtcO2 (PC15PtcO2, PC10PtcO2) were calculated. RESULTS: Repeatability measures, assessed as the 95% range for a single determination, were +/- 0.96 and +/- 1.12 doubling concentration differences respectively for PC15PtcO2 and PC10PtcO2 and +/- 0.80 for PC20FEV1. CONCLUSION: This challenge method using quadrupling concentrations and an indirect assessment of the response by PtcO2 was sufficiently repeatable for clinical use and compared favourably with repeated challenge assessed by FEV1. The PtcO2 method is simple and effort independent, and should prove particularly useful for measuring bronchial reactivity in young children.

Full text

PDF
804

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chatham M., Bleecker E. R., Norman P., Smith P. L., Mason P. A screening test for airways reactivity. An abbreviated methacholine inhalation challenge. Chest. 1982 Jul;82(1):15–18. doi: 10.1378/chest.82.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chinn S. Statistics in respiratory medicine. 2. Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax. 1991 Jun;46(6):454–456. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.6.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cockcroft D. W., Berscheid B. A., Murdock K. Y. Measurement of responsiveness to inhaled histamine using FEV1: comparison of PC20 and threshold. Thorax. 1983 Jul;38(7):523–526. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.7.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cockcroft D. W., Killian D. N., Mellon J. J., Hargreave F. E. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy. 1977 May;7(3):235–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1977.tb01448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duiverman E. J., Neijens H. J., van Strik R., van der Snee-van Smaalen M., Kerrebijn K. F. Bronchial responsiveness in asthmatic children aged 3 to 8 years measured by forced pseudo-random noise oscillometry. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1986 Jan-Feb;22(1):27–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eber E., Varga E. M., Zach M. S. Cold air challenge of airway reactivity in children: a correlation of transcutaneously measured oxygen tension and conventional lung functions. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991;10(4):273–277. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950100409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guidelines for standardization of bronchial challenges with (nonspecific) bronchoconstricting agents. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1983 Sep-Oct;19(5):495–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Juniper E. F., Frith P. A., Dunnett C., Cockcroft D. W., Hargreave F. E. Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine. Thorax. 1978 Dec;33(6):705–710. doi: 10.1136/thx.33.6.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mochizuki H., Mitsuhashi M., Tokuyama K., Tajima K., Morikawa A., Kuroume T. A new method of estimating bronchial hyper-responsiveness in younger children. Ann Allergy. 1985 Aug;55(2):162–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mochizuki H., Mitsuhashi M., Tokuyama K., Tajima K., Morikawa A., Kuroume T. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in younger children with asthma. Ann Allergy. 1988 Feb;60(2):103–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murakami G., Igarashi T., Adachi Y., Matsuno M., Adachi Y., Sawai M., Yoshizumi A., Okada T. Measurement of bronchial hyperreactivity in infants and preschool children using a new method. Ann Allergy. 1990 Apr;64(4):383–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prendiville A., Maxwell D. L., Rose A., Silverman M. Histamine-induced airway obstruction in infancy: changes in oxygenation. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1988;4(3):164–168. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950040308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ryan G., Dolovich M. B., Roberts R. S., Frith P. A., Juniper E. F., Hargreave F. E., Newhouse M. T. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Feb;123(2):195–199. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.123.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson N. M., Phagoo S. B., Silverman M. Atopy, bronchial responsiveness, and symptoms in wheezy 3 year olds. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Apr;67(4):491–495. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.4.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wilson N. M., Phagoo S. B., Silverman M. Use of transcutaneous oxygen tension, arterial oxygen saturation, and respiratory resistance to assess the response to inhaled methacholine in asthmatic children and normal adults. Thorax. 1991 Jun;46(6):433–437. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.6.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yan K., Salome C., Woolcock A. J. Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness. Thorax. 1983 Oct;38(10):760–765. doi: 10.1136/thx.38.10.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES