Abstract
The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) pollution to the environment is a major threat to the living organisms, and hence the degradation of these PAHs is necessary. Studies on PAHs degrading bacteria have focussed on terrestrial microbes and the potential of marine derived microbes is undermined. Herein we report the isolation and characterization of PAHs degrading Burkholderia sp. from lagoon sediments collected at the Southern coast of India. The strain was Gram negative, rod-shaped, motile, and ∼2–5 μm in length. Based on the phylogenetic data the strain was identified as Burkholderia and designated as VITRSB1. Initial PAHs degradation ability of the strain was assessed using basal salt medium supplemented with diesel, kerosene, toluene, aniline, naphthalene, and phenol. The strain was found to be effectively degrading kerosene, diesel, toluene, and aniline even at higher concentration (1%). However, naphthalene and aniline were degraded only at lower concentration (0.1%) and phenol, camphor, and DAP inhibited the growth of the strain. Furthermore, the degraded end products of the PAHs were determined using FTIR. Notably, none of the end products were found to be toxic to the biosphere. Our results indicate that the isolated Burkholderia sp. could be a prospective candidate for the effective degradation of selective PAHs.
1. Introduction
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are produced as a result of both natural and human activities and are considered as environmental contaminants due to their toxic nature [1]. PAHs are formed as a result of incomplete combustion of organic materials such as fossil fuels. The sources of PAHs include motor vehicle exhausts, industrial activities, and coal burning [2]. The occurrence of PAHs in ambient air is an increasing concern because of their carcinogenicity and mutagenicity [3]. Although emissions and allowable concentrations of PAHs in the air are now regulated, the health risk posed by PAH exposure suggests a continuing need for their control through air quality management [3]. PAHs are possible contaminants in some former industrial sites, representing a potential risk to human health if these sites are converted to residential areas.
The bioremediation process is the accepted process for the reinstatement of PAH's contaminated groundwater and sediments [4, 5]. Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in oil and other nonaqueous phase liquids by bacterial cultures has been reported in both batch and field scale studies [6, 7]. Many bacterial species are known to degrade PAH [1, 8, 9]. Even though bioremediation is economic; few bacteria are reported to efficiently degrade high molecular weight PAHs. So there is an urgent need to find out novel strains for the degradation of high molecular weight PAHs. Among various bacteria, Burkholderia sp. is known to degrade a variety of environmental contaminants [1]. Burkholderia are found both in soil and in water [10, 11]. Burkholderia cepacia complex is a group of nine closely related bacterial species that have useful properties in the natural environment as plant pest antagonists, plant growth promoters, and degradative agents [12, 13]. Many species of Burkholderia, namely, B. cepacia, B. vietnamiensis, and B. ambifaria, have been reported to have biodegradation potential [13, 14]. In recent years, B. cepacia has been studied extensively and reported as a potential hydrocarbon degrading bacteria. It has been demonstrated as an excellent n-alkane degradation characteristics [7]. Burkholderia sp. FDS-1 has been isolated and characterized for the degradation of fenitrothion, a nitro phenolic pesticide [15]. Additionally, Burkholderia have also been used as a plant growth promoting rhizobacteria because several mechanisms related to plant growth promotion were detected in this genus [16]. Nevertheless, isolation and exploitation of Burkholderia from marine ecosystem are scanty. In this study, a Burkholderia strain was isolated from Chavara lagoon located at the Southern coast of India. Considering the organism's potential for biodegradation, it was evaluated for the biodegradation of PAHs: diesel, kerosene, naphthalene, toluene, phenol, aniline, camphor, and a fertilizer, DAP complex.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Media
The PAHs used for the study were naphthalene, toluene, diesel, aniline, naphthalene, camphor, kerosene, and DAP complex (local purchase). The stock solutions of the PAHs were prepared as reported by [17]. The basal salt media (BSM) (Himedia, India) were used for the isolation and cultivation of Burkholderia sp. [18, 19] basal salt medium.
2.2. Sample Collection and Enrichment
Sediment samples were collected from the Ashtamudi lagoon, Chavara, located at the Arabian Coast of India (lat.: 8°57′48′N; long.: 76°33′43′E). Sediment samples collected from a depth of 5 cm were transferred into sterile plastic bottles and transported to the laboratory aseptically. The basal salt media components were added to the sediment sample bottles containing 100 mL of sediment water and incubated in dark for one week at 28°C. Then the sediment samples were serially diluted and plated on BSM media containing different PAHs (0.1% to 1%). The agar plates were incubated at 30°C for 2 days. The isolate that has grown on at least 3 PAHs containing media was chosen for further studies. The resistant isolate was subcultured repeatedly in BSM media to obtain the pure culture. The inoculum was prepared by culturing the isolate in BSM media at 30°C for 2 days. After incubation, the culture was centrifuged at (10621 ×g) for 10 min. The harvested cells were washed and reconstituted with BSM media and used as inoculums for further studies.
2.3. Taxonomy
The phenotypic characters of the strain were carried out as described earlier [20]. The fully grown culture was taken and centrifuged at 8000 ×g for 10 min. The obtained pellet was washed with potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) for 3 times. Further, the pellet was fixed with 5% formaldehyde for 1 hour and washed again with phosphate buffer (pH 7). The pellet was lyophilised using freeze dryer SKL-12N (Lark, Chennai, India). The samples for TEM were prepared by directly applying the lyophilised cell pellets to copper grids and allowed to dry for 2 hr. These dried copper grids were then directly observed under TEM (TECHNAI10-Philiphs). The DNA of the strain was isolated using Hipura bacterial DNA isolation and purification kit (Himedia, India). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using a Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystem Foster City, CA). PCR amplification was performed with primer set FC27 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and RC1492 (5′-TACGGCTACCTTACGACTT-3′) (Sigma Aldrich, USA). The methodology for sequencing was adapted from the earlier reports [21]. BLAST search was performed using NCBI database and multiple sequence alignment was carried out in ClustalX [22]. The phylogenetic tree was generated using the neighbour joining method [23] using MEGA 6 software [24]. Bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replicates.
2.4. Primary Screening
A loopful of culture was inoculated into the BSM media containing different PAHs such as diesel, kerosene, toluene, aniline, naphthalene, phenol, camphor, and DAP complex. All the test compounds were syringe filtered. A stock solution of naphthalene was prepared in methanol (200 μg/mL) and camphor was prepared in ethyl acetate (0.2 g/mL). DAP complex stock solution was prepared in water (0.5 g/mL). 1 mL and 0.1 mL of diesel, kerosene, toluene, aniline, and phenol and 1 mL of stock solution of naphthalene, camphor, and DAP complex were supplemented in BSM agar. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 hours.
2.5. Degradation Study in Liquid Culture
The ability of the strain to degrade the PAH is evaluated by inoculating it in BSM broth containing different PAHs (0.1% and 1%). About 1 mL of the compound (1%) was added to 20 mL BSM broth. To this, 100 μL of primary inoculum was added and incubated for 48 hours at 30°C and kept in shaker and observed for growth. The culture was centrifuged at (6797 ×g) for 10 min and the supernatant was lyophilized (Lark Penguin Freeze Dryer, India). The lyophilized samples were analysed using FTIR (Schimadzu, Japan).
3. Results and Discussion
PAHs are group of compounds composed of fused aromatic rings that are highly stable and carcinogenic [25]. They are formed by the pyrolysis and pyrosynthesis of organic molecules. All the PAHs are known to cause cancer on prolonged exposure [26, 27]. Various methods have been employed to remove the PAHs including volatilization, chemical oxidation, and bioaccumulation [28]. Bacteria are one of the hydrocarbon degrading agents in the environment and their degradation potential depends upon the metabolic capability [29]. The potential approach for the remediation of PAHs is using the indigenous bacteria from the contaminated site. Though there have been several studies on PAH degrading bacteria from terrestrial ecosystem, studies on bacterial isolation from marine sites are very few. This study focussed on the screening and isolation of PAH degrading bacteria from Ashtamudi lagoon, Chavara. Chavara is situated on the Arabian Coast, Kerala, (lat.: 8°57′48′N; long.: 76°33′43′E). Chavara contains several lakes and lagoons. The seashore of Chavara is rich in titanium [30]. Kerala Minerals and Metals Limited, located in Chavara, is one of the largest industries which exports mineral sand containing mainly titanium. The soil samples were collected from this region where the industrial wastes were discharged into the lagoon. These samples were used for the screening of PAH's degrading bacteria.
In the preliminary screening, strain VITRSB1 alone grew on the plates supplemented with naphthalene, kerosene, diesel, toluene, and aniline and thus it was chosen for further studies. Nonetheless, the growth of VITRSB1 was completely inhibited when the media is supplemented with phenol, camphor, and DAP.
The phenotypic characters showed the strain VITRSB1 is Gram negative, aerobic, motile, and rod-shaped. The colonies were mucoid and white in colour. The size of the bacteria is about 2–5 μm in length and a flagellum was observed when viewed under TEM (Figure 1). The strain utilizes sodium nitrate as nitrogen source and sodium succinate as carbon source. BLAST analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the strain revealed 99% similarity with Burkholderia cenocepacia H111 strain. The phylogenetic tree of the strain showed that it occupies a distinct position within the representatives of Burkholderia family (Figure 2). The strain was submitted in genbank under the accession number KF146158. The G + C content was found to be 55.20%.
Figure 1.
TEM image of Burkholderia sp. VITRSB1 with single flagellum at the end of the bacteria. Samples were stained with osmium tetroxide. Magnification: 17500x; (a) the rod shape of the Burkholderia is evident from the TEM image; (b) the flagellum is clearly visible at the end of the bacteria.
Figure 2.
Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences displaying the position of the isolate Burkholderia sp. VITRSB1 with a bootstrap value of 1000. Scale bar: 0.02.
In the preliminary analysis, growth was observed in plates supplemented with diesel, kerosene, and toluene indicating that the PAHs were utilized by the strain. Since there was no growth in plates supplemented with higher concentration (1%) of aniline, naphthalene, and phenol, a lower concentration (0.1%) of these compounds was used for further studies. In the degradation test, the BSM containing diesel turned turbid and the colour changed to green indicating the degradation. The degradation test for toluene, aniline, kerosene, and naphthalene showed notable growth indicating the tolerance of the organism to the hydrocarbons. It has been reported that Burkholderia synthesize three ring fission pathways and three oxygenases for the oxidation of substituted benzene [31]. Burkholderia also synthesize various enzymes for the degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons [32].
Furthermore, the PAHs treated culture was analysed for the degraded products by FTIR. The FTIR spectra before degradation showed peaks at 3388.93, 3417.86, and 3441.01 which corresponds to the NH and OH stretch of primary amines and alcohol in the toluene (Table 1). The absence of peaks at 3388.93, 3417.86, 3441.01, 2113.98, 2017.54, 1099.43, and 621.08 after degradation indicates the degradation of toluene (Figure 3) [33]. Diesel contains hydrocarbons in the range of 2000 to 4000, a complex mixture of normal, branched, and cyclic alkanes, and aromatic compounds [34]. Figure 4 shows the degradation spectra of diesel. The peaks at 2956.87 and 2924.09 correspond to the CH, OH, and NH stretch of alkanes, alcohols, and amines (Table 2). The absence of peaks at 2956.87, 2924.09, 2854.65, 1629.85, 1467.83, and 1091.71 in the second spectrum (Figure 4) indicates the degradation of compounds. The FTIR spectra of kerosene degradation spectra (Figure 5) reveal the presence of peaks at 3251, 3444.87, 3417, and 3390 which corresponds to primary and secondary amines (Table 3). The absence of peaks in these regions after degradation indicates degradation of kerosene.
Table 1.
Table showing frequencies obtained in FTIR and their corresponding functional groups before degradation and after degradation of toluene.
| Serial number | Frequency | Bond | Functional group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3388.93 3417.86 3441.01 3452.58 |
N H stretch O H stretch H bonded |
Primary and secondary amines, amides Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 2113.98 2017.54 |
C (triple bond) C stretch |
Alkynes |
| 3 | 1641.42 | C=C stretch | Alkenes |
| 4 | 1402.25 | C C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 5 | 1099.43 | C N stretch | Aliphatic amines |
| 6 | 989.48 | C H bend | Alkenes |
| 7 | 931.62 | O H bend | Carboxylic acids |
| 8 | 621.08 538.14 |
C Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
|
| |||
| After degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3352.28 | N H stretch O H stretch H bonded |
Primary and secondary amines, amides Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 1641.42 | C=C stretch | Alkenes |
| 3 | 1402.25 | C C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 4 | 1101.35 | C O stretch | Alcohols, carboxylic acids, esters, and ethers |
| 5 | 989.48 | C H bend | Alkenes |
| 6 | 937.40 | O H bend | Carboxylic acids |
| 7 | 858.32 | C H “oop” N H wag =C H bend |
Aromatics Primary and secondary amines Alkenes |
| 8 | 532.35 619.15 |
C Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
Figure 3.
FTIR spectrum of toluene before and after degradation. About 1% toluene incubated with VITRSB1 strain for 48 hrs and analysed in FTIR. (a) Toluene before degradation with VITRSB1 strain. (b) Toluene after degradation with VITRSB1 strain.
Figure 4.
FTIR spectrum of diesel obtained before and after degradation. 1% diesel was used and incubated with the VITRSB1 strain. (a) Diesel before degradation with VITRSB1 strain. (b) Diesel after degradation with VITRSB1 strain.
Table 2.
Table showing frequencies obtained in FTIR and their corresponding functional groups before degradation and after degradation of diesel.
| Serial number | Frequency | Bond | Functional group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3425.58 | O-H stretch, H bonded | Alcohol, phenols |
| 2 | 2956.87 2924.09 2854.65 |
C-H stretch O-H stretch |
Alkanes Carboxylic acids |
| 3 | 1641.42 | N-H bend -C=C- stretch |
Primary amines Alkenes |
| 4 | 1629.85 | N-H bend | Primary amines |
| 5 | 1467.83 | C-H bend C-C stretch (in ring) |
Alkanes Aromatics |
| 6 | 1402.25 | C-C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 7 | 1091.71 | C-N stretch | Aliphatic amines |
| 8 | 989.48 | =C-H bend | Alkenes |
| 9 | 862.18 | N-H wag | Primary and secondary amines |
| 10 | 715.58 | C-H “oop” | Aromatics |
| 11 | 621.08 534.28 |
C-Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
|
| |||
| After degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3441.01 3244.27 |
O-H stretch, H-bonded | Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 1641.42 | -C=C- stretch | Alkenes |
| 3 | 1402.25 | C-C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 4 | 1101.35 | C-H stretch | Aliphatic amines |
| 5 | 989.48 937.40 |
=C-H bend | Alkenes |
| 6 | 858.32 | N-H wag | Primary and secondary amines |
| 7 | 619.15 532.35 |
C-Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
Figure 5.
FTIR spectrum of kerosene obtained before and after degradation. 1% kerosene was used and incubated with VITRSB1 strain analysed in FTIR. (a) Kerosene before degradation with VITRSB1 strain; (b) kerosene after degradation with VITRSB1 strain.
Table 3.
Table showing frequencies visible in the spectra and their possible functional groups in FTIR before and after degradation of kerosene.
| Serial number | Frequency | Bond | Functional group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3444.87 3417.86 3390.86 |
N H stretch O-H stretch, H bonded |
Primary and secondary amines, amides Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 3251.98 | N H stretch C≡C H:CH stretch |
Primary and secondary amines, amides |
| 3 | 2856.58 | C H stretch O H stretch |
Alkanes Carboxylic acids |
| 4 | 1641.42 | C=C stretch N H bend |
Alkenes Primary amines |
| 5 | 1629.85 | N H bend C=C stretch |
Primary amines Alkenes |
| 6 | 1402.25 | C C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 7 | 1093.64 | C N stretch | Aliphatic amines |
| 8 | 989.48 | =C H bend | Alkenes |
| 9 | 621.08 | C Cl stretch C≡C H:C H B end |
Alkyl halides Alkynes |
| 10 | 534.28 | C Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
|
| |||
| After degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3442.94 | O H stretch, H bonded | Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 3174.83 | O H stretch | Carboxylic acids |
| 3 | 1641.42 | C=C stretch N H bend |
Alkenes Primary amines |
| 4 | 1629.85 | N H bend | Primary amines |
| 5 | 1400.32 | C C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 6 | 1091.71 | C O stretch | Alcohols, carboxylic acids, esters, and ethers |
| 7 | 991.41 | =C H bend | Alkenes |
| 8 | 866.04 | N H wag | Primary and secondary amines |
| 9 | 621.08 | C Cl stretch | Alkyl halides |
| 10 | 532.35 | C Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
Naphthalene spectra (Figure 6) show peaks at 3170.97 and 1666.50 which corresponds to -C≡C-H: C-H stretch of alkynes and alkenes (Table 4) and the absence of peaks at 3170.97, 1666.50, 989.48, 937.40, 1109.07, and 867.97 after the treatment with VITRSB1 indicates the degradation of naphthalene [35]. FTIR spectra of aniline (Figure 7) show the peaks at 3639.68, 1726.29, and 1581.63 which corresponds to OH, C-O, and NH stretch of alcohols, carboxylic acids, and amines (Table 5). The absence of peaks at 3639.68, 1726.29, 1581.63, and 877.61 after treatment indicates the degradation of aniline [36, 37]. The Burkholderia sp. VITRSB1 did not show any growth when the BSM media were supplemented with phenol, camphor, and DAP. Growth was completely inhibited. Generally, high molecular weight PAHs degrade very slowly because the biodegradation ability primarily depends on the complexity of the chemical structures [38]. Therefore, the degradation efficiency is highly dependent on the type of hydrocarbon. This study reveals the ability of the marine derived Burkholderia sp. VITRSB1 to degrade low molecular weight hydrocarbons effectively. Hence, the use of Burkholderia will be effective and eco-friendly for the degradation of low molecular weight hydrocarbons. Further research on in situ bioremediation approaches and its plant growth promoting activities will reveal the potential applications of this strain.
Figure 6.
Naphthalene degradation spectra obtained before and after degradation. 1% naphthalene was used and incubated with VITRSB1 strain and analysed in FTIR. (a) Naphthalene before degradation with VITRSB1 strain; (b) naphthalene after degradation with VITRSB1 strain.
Table 4.
Table showing frequencies visible in the spectra and their possible functional groups before and after degradation of naphthalene.
| Serial number | Frequency | Bond | Functional group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3170.97 3153.61 |
-C≡C-H:C-H stretch | Alkynes (terminal) |
| 2 | 1666.50 | -C=C- stretch | Alkenes |
| 3 | 1402.25 | C-C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 4 | 1109.07 | C-N stretch | Aliphatic amines |
| 5 | 989.48 937.40 |
=C-H bend | Alkenes |
| 6 | 867.97 | C-H “oop” | Aromatics |
| 7 | 621.08 528.50 |
C-Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
|
| |||
| After degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3442.94 | O-H stretch, H bonded | Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 3163.26 | O-H stretch | Carboxylic acids |
| 3 | 3026.31 | C-H stretch | Aromatics |
| 4 | 1637.56 | N-H bend | Primary amines |
| 5 | 1400.32 | C-C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 6 | 1136.07 | C-H rock | Alkanes |
| 7 | 616.15 530.42 |
C-Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
Figure 7.
Aniline degradation spectra obtained before and after degradation. 1% aniline incubated with VITRSB1 strain and analysed in FTIR. (a) Aniline before degradation with VITRSB1 strain. (b) Aniline after degradation with VITRSB1 strain.
Table 5.
Table showing frequencies visible in the spectra and their possible functional groups before and after degradation of aniline.
| Serial number | Frequency | Bond | Functional group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3639.68 | O-H stretch, free hydroxyl | Alcohols, phenols |
| 2 | 3155.54 3140.11 |
O-H stretch | Carboxylic acids |
| 3 | 1726.29 | C=O stretch | Carbonyls, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, saturated aliphatics, and α and β-unsaturated esters |
| 4 | 1581.63 | N-H bend | Primary amines |
| 5 | 1402.25 | C-C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 6 | 1139.93 | C-O stretch | Alcohols, carboxylic acids, esters, and ethers |
| 7 | 935.48 | =C-H bend | Alkenes |
| 8 | 877.61 | C-H “oop” | Aromatics |
| 9 | 619.15 532.35 |
C-Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
|
| |||
| After degradation | |||
|
| |||
| 1 | 3163.26 3143.97 |
O-H stretch | Carboxylic acids |
| 2 | 1654.92 | -C=C- stretch | Alkenes |
| 3 | 1400.32 | C-C stretch (in ring) | Aromatics |
| 4 | 1139.93 | C-O stretch | Alcohols, carboxylic acids, esters, and ethers |
| 5 | 995.27 935.48 |
=C-H bend | Alkenes |
| 6 | 619.15 528.50 |
C-Br stretch | Alkyl halides |
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the institutional grant and the authors wish to thank VIT University for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
- 1.Johnsen A. R., Wick L. Y., Harms H. Principles of microbial PAH-degradation in soil. Environmental Pollution. 2005;133(1):71–84. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tang L., Tang X.-Y., Zhu Y.-G., Zheng M.-H., Miao Q.-L. Contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils in Beijing, China. Environment International. 2005;31(6):822–828. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim K.-H., Jahan S. A., Kabir E., Brown R. J. C. A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environment International. 2013;60:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vogel K. D., Chmm P. G., Peramaki M. P. Innovative remediation technologies applicable to soil and groundwater impacted by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environmental Geosciences. 1996;3(2):98–106. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vidali M. Bioremediation.: an overview. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2001;73(7):1163–1172. doi: 10.1351/pac200173071163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jeon B. Y., Jung L., Doo H. P. Mineralization of petroleum contaminated wastewater by co-culture of petroleum-degrading bacterial community and biosurfactant-producing bacterium. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2011;2(7):895–902. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mohanty G., Mukherji S. Biodegradation rate of diesel range n-alkanes by bacterial cultures Exiguobacterium aurantiacum and Burkholderia cepacia . International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2008;61(3):240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bamforth S. M., Singleton I. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 2005;80(7):723–736. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Seo J.-S., Keum Y.-S., Li Q. X. Bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2009;6(1):278–309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coenye T., Vandamme P., Govan J. R. W., Lipuma J. J. Taxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2001;39(10):3427–3436. doi: 10.1128/jcm.39.10.3427-3436.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mahenthiralingam E., Baldwin A., Dowson C. G. Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008;104(6):1539–1551. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bevivino A., Dalmastri C., Tabacchioni S., Chiarini L. Efficacy of Burkholderia cepacia MCI 7 in disease suppression and growth promotion of maize. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2000;31(3-4):225–231. doi: 10.1007/s003740050649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chiarini L., Bevivino A., Dalmastri C., Tabacchioni S., Visca P. Burkholderia cepacia complex species: health hazards and biotechnological potential. Trends in Microbiology. 2006;14(6):277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hebbar K. P., Martel M. H., Heulin T. Burkholderia cepacia, a plant growth promoting rhizobacterial associate of maize. In: Ryder M. H., Stephens P. M., Bowen G. D., editors. Proceedings of the 3rd Third International Workshop on Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria; March 1994; Adelaide, Australia. CSIRO; pp. 201–203. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hong Q., Zhang Z., Hong Y., Li S. A microcosm study on bioremediation of fenitrothion-contaminated soil using Burkholderia sp. FDS-1. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2007;59(1):55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.King E. B., Parke J. L. Population density of the biocontrol agent Burkholderia cepacia ammdr1 on four pea cultivars. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1996;28(3):307–312. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(95)00147-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim T. J., Lee E. Y., Kim Y. J., Cho K.-S., Ryu H. W. Degradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by Burkholderia cepacia 2A-12. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003;19(4):411–417. doi: 10.1023/a:1023998719787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abari A. H., Emtiazi G., Ghasemi S. M. The role of exopolysaccharide, biosurfactant and peroxidase enzymes on toluene degradation by bacteria isolated from marine and wastewater environments. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2012;5(3):479–485. doi: 10.5812/jjm.3554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Conway B.-A. D., Venu V., Speert D. P. Biofilm formation and acyl homoserine lactone production in the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184(20):5678–5685. doi: 10.1128/jb.184.20.5678-5685.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.American Society for Microbiology. Sentinel Laboratory Guidelines for Suspected Agents of Bioterrorism. American Society for Microbiology; 2003. (Burkholderia mallei and B. pseudomallei). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Prakash A., Thavaselvam D., Kumar A., et al. Isolation, identification and characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei from soil of coastal region of India. Springer Plus. 2014;3, article 438 doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research. 1994;22(22):4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 1987;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30(12):2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nam J. J., Song B. H., Eom K. C., Lee S. H., Smith A. Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in agricultural soils in South Korea. Chemosphere. 2003;50(10):1281–1289. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00764-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Clapp R. W., Jacobs M. M., Loechler E. L. Environmental and occupational causes of cancer: new evidence, 2005–2007. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2008;23(1):1–37. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2008.23.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ravindra, Mittal A. K., Van Grieken R. Health risk assessment of urban suspended particulate matter with special reference to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: a review. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2001;16(3):169–189. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2001.16.3.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou H. W., Wong A. H. Y., Yu R. M. K., Park Y. D., Wong Y. S., Tam N. F. Y. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced structural shift of bacterial communities in mangrove sediment. Microbial Ecology. 2009;58(1):153–160. doi: 10.1007/s00248-008-9456-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Venosa A. D., Zhu X., Suidan M. T., Lee K. Guidelines for the Bioremediation of Marine Shorelines and Freshwater Wetlands. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Risk Management Research Laboratory; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ajith G. A., Suresh Babu D. S., Damodaran K. T., Shankar R., Prabhu C. N. Weathering of ilmenite from chavara deposit and its comparision with manavalakurichi placer ilmenite, southwestern India. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2009;34(2):115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnson C. R. Phenanthrene biodegradation kinetics in soil [PhD Dissertation Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry Graduate Group] Davis, Calif, USA: University of California; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barriault D. S. M., Sylvestre M. Evolution of the biphenyl dioxygenase BphA from Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 by random mutagenesis of multiple sites in region III. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279(46):47480–47488. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m406805200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ainon H., Arezoo T., Amir R. Detection of toluene degradation in bacteria isolated from oil contaminated soils. Sains Malaysiana. 2011;40(11):1231–1235. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gallego J. L. R., Loredo J., Llamas J. F., Vázquez F., Sánchez J. Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils: evaluation of potential in situ techniques by study of bacterial degradation. Biodegradation. 2001;12(5):325–335. doi: 10.1023/a:1014397732435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lin C., Gan L., Chen Z.-L. Biodegradation of naphthalene by strain Bacillus fusiformis (BFN) Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010;182(1–3):771–777. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lyons C. D., Katz S., Bartha R. Mechanisms and pathways of aniline elimination from aquatic environments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1984;48(3):491–496. doi: 10.1128/aem.48.3.491-496.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schnell S., Bak F., Pfennig N. Anaerobic degradation of aniline and dihydroxybenzenes by newly isolated sulfate-reducing bacteria and description of Desulfobacterium anilini . Archives of Microbiology. 1989;152(6):556–563. doi: 10.1007/bf00425486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Walton B. T., Anderson T. A. Structural properties of organic chemicals as predictors of biodegradation and microbial toxicity in soils. Chemosphere. 1988;17(8):1501–1507. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(88)90203-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]







