Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Nov 12;5:16472. doi: 10.1038/srep16472

Nondestructive nanofabrication on Si(100) surface by tribochemistry-induced selective etching

Jian Guo 1, Bingjun Yu 1, Lei Chen 1, Linmao Qian 1,a
PMCID: PMC4642297  PMID: 26559014

Abstract

A tribochemistry-induced selective etching approach is proposed for the first time to produce silicon nanostructures without lattice damage. With a ~1 nm thick SiOx film as etching mask grown on Si(100) surface (Si(100)/SiOx) by wet-oxidation technique, nano-trenches can be produced through the removal of local SiOx mask by a SiO2 tip in humid air and the post-etching of the exposed Si in potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. The material removal of SiOx mask and Si under low load is dominated by the tribochemical reaction at the interface between SiO2 tip and Si/SiOx sample, where the contact pressure is much lower than the critical pressure for initial yield of Si. High resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) observation indicates that neither the material removal induced by tribochemical reaction nor the wet etching in KOH solution leads to lattice damage of the fabricated nanostructures. The proposed approach points out a new route in nondestructive nanofabrication.


Due to its excellent mechanical and physical properties, monocrystalline silicon has become the most important structural material for fabricating various nanostructures in photovoltaic devices1,2, micro/nanoelectromechanical systems3,4, etc. As the way to realize such nanostructures, the traditional Si-based nanofabrication approaches are faced with lots of technical challenges in resolution, destruction, flexibility, etc. Photolithography is a typical nanofabrication approach with high-throughput in mass production, but its fabrication process is costly and tends to be limited in resolution5. In addition, photolithography is not suitable for flexible fabrication of micro-mold and prototype fabrication of microsystems6. Nanoimprint lithography is an effective approach for patterning nanostructures with high resolution7. However, the structural damage and stamping defects easily take place during both the imprinting and demoulding processes. Other reported Si-based fabrication techniques such as focused ion beam (FIB) assisted nanolithography8,9 and scanning probe microscopy (SPM)-based mechanical scratching or cutting10 have the straightforward processes, high resolution and flexibility, but the fabrication-induced damage in the subsurface, such as plastic deformation and amorphization, cannot be avoided11,12.

Recently, maskless friction-induced nanofabrication has attracted a lot of attention by virtue of its simplicity, flexibility and low-destruction13,14,15,16,17. In the friction-induced nanofabrication process of silicon, the silicon substrate is partly transformed to amorphous silicon by diamond tip scratching firstly13,14,15,16,17. Then the amorphous silicon layer can be directly served as an etching mask in potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution to fabricate protrusive nanostructures14,15,16,17, or selectively dissolved by hydrofluoric acid (HF) solution to fabricate nano-trenches17. However, the structural damage of the nanostructures fabricated by using the friction-induced nanofabrication methods still exists. Since it can degrade the mechanical and physical properties of the nanostructures18,19, the structural damage is detrimental to various applications. Therefore, how to eliminate or avoid the fabrication-induced nanostructure destruction becomes a significant concern. In addition, nanostructures such as nano-hole and nano-trench can also be realized on the surface of semiconductor material through removing local mask layers with mechanical scratch and subsequent wet etching20,21,22. These findings open a door to develop new SPM-based nanolithography method for fabricating nanostructures with lower fabrication destruction.

In this paper, we report a simple and feasible nondestructive nanofabrication approach on monocrystalline silicon through tribochemistry-induced selective etching. With a ~1 nm thick SiOx film as etching mask grown on Si/SiOx surface by wet-oxidation technique, nano-trenches with required depths can be produced through the removal of local SiOx mask by a SiO2 tip in humid air and the post-etching of the exposed Si in KOH solution. Experimental results show that both the ambient humidity and normal load of tip scanning during the fabrication process has remarkable effect on the fabrication depth. Different from the traditional material removal mechanism of the SPM-based mechanical scratching or cutting methods with a diamond tip, the material removal of Si/SiOx under low contact pressure (far from enough to result in the initial yield of silicon) in the present method is determined by the tribochemical reaction at the interface between SiO2 tip and Si/SiOx sample. High resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) observation indicates that in the present approach, neither the material removal induced by tribochemical reaction nor the wet etching in KOH solution leads to lattice damage beneath the fabrication area. The nondestructive fabrication capability of this approach is demonstrated by a series of nanostructures on Si(100) surface, such as array of nano-trenches, nanochannels and multilayered nanostructure.

Results

Fabrication process of the tribochemistry-induced selective etching

Figure 1 shows the fabrication process of the tribochemistry-induced selective etching on Si(100) surface. Firstly, SiOx film with thickness of ~1 nm was generated on the H-passivated Si(100) surface through the wet-oxidation technique with hot HNO3 solution (Fig. 1a)23. Secondly, the local SiOx film on the target area of Si(100) substrate was removed through the scanning of SiO2 tip under low load in humid air to expose the Si(100) substrate (Fig. 1b). It has been clarified that under the mechanical shear by the SiO2 tip in humid air, the tribochemical wear occurs24,25,26. During the wear process, Si-O-Si bridges firstly form at the contact interface, then water molecules hydrolyze and dissociate the strained Si-O-Si bonding bridges easily to produce the silane compounds that can be removed by tip scanning. As a result, both the SiOx layer and silicon substrate on the scanned area can be gradually removed by such tribochemical reaction. Thirdly, the exposed Si was selectively etched by KOH solution to form a deep nano-trench (Fig. 1c). Due to its lower etching rate in KOH solution than Si(100), the SiOx on the non-scanned area was served as a mask to protect the Si(100) substrate below from etching. Under the present experimental condition, the etching selectivity of SiOx:Si(100) was estimated as about 1:250, which was close to the reported selectivity of SiO2:Si(100) in KOH solution (less than 1:18527).

Figure 1. Schematic diagram (top) and fabrication example characterized by AFM (bottom) showing the nondestructive nanofabrication process of tribochemistry-induced selective etching.

Figure 1

(a) Growing of SiOx film with ~1 nm in thickness on H-passivated Si(100) surface by wet-oxidation technique. (b) Scanning a SiO2 tip on a Si/SiOx sample in humid air to remove the target SiOx mask. (c) Post-etching of the exposed Si in KOH solution to fabricate deep nano-trench.

Effect of humidity and normal load on the fabrication depth

Experimental results suggested that the fabrication depth depended on not only the KOH etching period but also the relative humidity (RH) and the normal load Fn during tip scanning process. The in-situ three-dimensional topographies of the fabrication areas under various humidity and experiment of load conditions were characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM, Figure S1 and Figure S2 in Supplementary Section 1).

The fabrication depth (before and after post-etching) versus RH curves are plotted in Fig. 2a. It indicated that under the given load of 3 μN, (i) when RH was 0%, in the absence of tribochemical reaction, no appreciable wear could be observed on the scanned area of SiO2 tip from the AFM image. However, because of the slight disturbance of the SiOx structure by mechanical interaction, the disturbed SiOx could be selectively dissolved in KOH solution slowly to obtain a shallow nano-trench; (ii) The tribochemical reaction would be intensified with the increase of RH in certain range (0%–50%), resulting in the increasing material removal (tribochemical wear) of Si/SiOx; (iii) There was a threshold RH (~20%) above which the SiOx on the scanned area could be removed thoroughly to expose the Si substrate. Then the exposed Si could be etched by KOH solution to fabricate deeper nano-trench. It was revealed that the tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication could be realized at common humidity condition, without the need for a higher humidity. Figure 2b shows the load dependence of the fabrication depth. The result suggested that load could intensify the tribochemical wear of Si/SiOx, and at present experimental condition, a condition of Fn ≈ 1 μN and one scanning cycle was enough to realize the removal of SiOx mask with ~1 nm in thickness. Once the Si substrate on tip scanning area was exposed, deeper nano-trenches could be produced quickly through the selective etching of Si in KOH solution.

Figure 2. Effect of humidity and normal load on the fabrication depth.

Figure 2

(a) Fabrication depth vs relative humidity (area-scanning under Fn of 3 μN, post-etching in KOH solution for 15 min). (b) Fabrication depth vs normal load (area-scanning at RH of 50%, post-etching in KOH solution for 10 min).

Since the maximum Hertzian contact pressure during the scanning process by SiO2 tip (calculated as about 0.48–1.2 GPa) was far below the critical pressure for initial yield of Si (~11.3 GPa26), such contact between SiO2 tip and Si substrate should be elastic. Moreover, the anisotropic etching of Si in KOH solution is pure chemical behavior28, which does not bring lattice distortion beneath the etched nano-trench. Therefore, the subsurface of the fabricated trench was deduced to be composed of damage-free monocrystalline silicon.

HRTEM characterization on the tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication area

In order to verify whether the tribochemistry-induced selective etching nanofabrication brings destruction or not, both the tip scanning area and KOH post-etching area were observed by cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (XTEM), as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 3. XTEM observation of the tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication area.

Figure 3

(a) HRTEM image of the scanned area by SiO2 tip. (b) HRTEM image of the post-etched area by KOH solution. When using epoxy as the passivation layer for preparing the XTEM samples, because the SiOx film (amorphous oxide layer) on silicon substrate surface showed a featureless microstructure similar to that of the epoxy passivation layer, the ~1 nm thick SiOx film on the top surface of silicon substrate was difficult to be identified in TEM images.

Figure 3a shows the XTEM observation of the scanned area with the SiOx mask removed thoroughly. The observed nano-trench with depth of 18 nm and width of 118 nm (XTEM image, in the middle of Fig. 3a, the cross-section is (110) crystal face of Si) was fabricated on a Si(100)/SiOx sample by line-scanning mode under the conditions of Fn = 2 μN, number of scanning cycles N = 500 and RH = 50%. After the fabrication, the SiOx film and partial silicon substrate beneath the SiOx film on the scanned area were removed because of the tribochemical wear mentioned before. As shown in the HRTEM lattice fringe images, the structure of the scanned area is monocrystalline silicon, no amorphous silicon layer and lattice distortion layer are observed. Figure 3b shows the XTEM observation of the post-etched area by KOH solution. Firstly, a shallow nano-trench was fabricated by line-scanning mode with a SiOx tip under the same fabrication conditions as those of the nano-trench shown in Fig. 3a. Secondly, this sample was dipped into KOH solution etching for 10 min to obtain the final nano-trench with depth of 147 nm and width of 220 nm (XTEM image, in the middle of Fig. 3b). The slope sidewall of nano-trench is (111) crystal face of Si, which is well known to be the etch-stop crystal face due to its ultralow etching rate in KOH solution28. It can be clearly observed that the post-etched area is also damage-free monocrystalline silicon without dislocation at all. The result of HRTEM observation of the fabricated area has effectively demonstrated that neither the material removal dominated by tribochemical reaction nor the wet etching in KOH solution results in lattice damage beneath the fabricated area. Such fabricated nanostructure can keep its original single crystal lattice.

Nondestructive nanostructures fabricated on Si(100)

Based on the tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication method, a series of nondestructive nanostructures were fabricated on Si(100) surface. Figure 4a shows a high-density 5 × 5 nano-trench array with depth of ~100 nm, which was fabricated by area-scanning under the condition of RH = 50%, Fn = 3 μN and t (post-etching period of KOH solution) = 5 min. Figure 4b shows four nanochannels with the same length of 8 μm and width of 0.5 μm, different depths of about 0.7, 3.8, 7.8 and 15 nm. Such nanochannels were directly produced by area-scanning of SiO2 tip under RH = 50%, Fn = 1 μN and the changed N of 1, 2, 4 and 8, respectively. Figure 4c shows a multilayered nanostructure produced on Si(100) surface by carrying out twice tribochemistry-induced selective etching fabrication. Firstly, the first nano-trench with depth of ~190 nm was produced on a Si(100)/SiOx sample under Fn = 3 μN and t = 10 min in the 1st fabrication period. Secondly, after new SiOx mask was grown on the trench area, the second nano-trench with ~130 nm in depth within the first nano-trench was generated under Fn = 3 μN and t = 5 min in the 2nd fabrication period. This fabrication case suggested that nondestructive refabrication on the fabricated surface could be realized through the repetition of tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication process, by which the complex multilevel nanostructures could be fabricated easily.

Figure 4. Nondestructive nanostructures on Si(100) surface fabricated by tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication method.

Figure 4

(a) A 5 × 5 array of nano-trenches. (b) Nanochannels. (c) Multilayered nanostructure.

The fabrication process of tribochemistry-induced selective etching is conductivity-independent and straightforward. Without the need for any additional field (such as electrical field) and template, nano-trenches with arbitrary shape can be precisely patterned on the specified location through programming the trace of tip. By virtue of the near atomic scale tribochemistry wear, the minimum fabrication depth can be below 1 nm (several atoms layer). Different from the traditional SPM-based nanolithography methods for monocrystalline silicon, where the material removal is mainly realized through mechanically scratching or cutting under high load, the tribochemistry-induced material removal process is dominated by tribochemical reaction under much lower load and then does not lead to the lattice damage beneath the fabrication area. A contrasting example of the two different material removal behaviors is shown in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Section 2). The tribochemistry-induced approach can be used for fabricating nondestructive silicon nano-textures in order to improve or regulate the surface hydrophobicity or tribology properties29,30,31. In addition, the nanochannels free of lattice damage are expected to be applied as the key components in micro/nano fluidic systems32, which are widely used in drug delivery, ion transporters, DNA translocators, and so on33,34,35,36. The nondestructive tribochemistry-induced nanofabrication method is also available for other chemical reactive surface, such as GaAs, to produce defect-free or well-ordered nanostructures37.

Conclusion

In summary, we have proposed a simple and feasible nanofabrication approach to produce damage-free monocrystalline silicon nanostructures. When the contact pressure does not result in the initial yield of Si, the material removal of Si/SiOx is determined by the tribochemical reaction between the SiO2 tip and Si/SiOx sample. Experimental results suggest that the fabrication depth is mainly dependent on the humidity, the normal load during tip scanning process and the etching period in KOH solution. Results of HRTEM observation reveal that the nanostructures fabricated by tribochemistry-induced selective etching are free of lattice damage. Such nondestructive nanostructures are very difficult to be fabricated by conventional SPM-based mechanical cutting or friction-induced nanofabrication methods.

Experimental

Materials and methods

Experiments were performed on p-type Si(100) wafers with thickness of 0.5 mm (MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., USA). Before the fabrication, samples were dipped into 10 wt.% HF solution for 2 min to remove the superficial native oxide layer, and then the Si surface became H-passivated38. Because of its strong oxidizing and low viscosity, HNO3 solution was used to produce SiOx mask on Si substrate23. The H-passivated Si samples were soaked in ~65 wt.% HNO3 solution for 30 min at 80 °C, then SiOx film with ~1 nm in thickness (characterized by scanning Auger nanoprobe (PHI 700, ULVAC-PHI, Inc., Japan), see Figure S5 in Supplementary Section 3) was generated on Si(100) substrate. With an AFM (SPI3800N, Seiko, Japan), the root-mean-square roughness of the Si/SiOx sample was measured to be less than 0.08 nm over an area of 500 nm × 500 nm. Spherical SiO2 tips (Novascan Technologies, USA) with radii of ~1.0 μm were employed for the scanning to remove the local SiOx mask. The normal spring constant of the cantilever was 14 N/m. In post-etching procedure, a mixture of 20 wt.% KOH solution and isopropyl alcohol (volume ratio = 5:1) was used as an etchant for selective etching of the exposed Si. The etching temperature was set to be 23 ± 2 °C.

AFM and XTEM characterization

All of the AFM images were scanned by silicon nitride probes (MLCT, Bruker Corp., USA) with a spring constant of 0.1 N/m. The microscopic structural feature of the fabricated area on silicon sample was detected by XTEM (Tecnai G2 F20, FEI, USA). The XTEM samples of the fabricated area were prepared using a FIB (NanoLab 400, FEI, USA) miller. Before FIB cutting, an epoxy polymer passivation layer was deposited on the sample surface to protect the surface from damage in subsequent FIB cutting process.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Guo, J. et al. Nondestructive nanofabrication on Si(100) surface by tribochemistry-induced selective etching. Sci. Rep. 5, 16472; doi: 10.1038/srep16472 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep16472-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91323302, 51375409 and 51305365), and want to thank Chenfei Song for his proposal concerning this paper.

Footnotes

Author Contributions J.G. and L.C. finished the experiments involved and acquired the original data in this paper. B.J.Y. and L.M.Q. have made substantial contributions to the concept and design of this paper. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. Yang J. et al. Design and fabrication of broadband ultralow reflectivity black Si surfaces by laser micro/nanoprocessing. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e185 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. Priolo F., Gregorkiewicz T., Galli M. & Krauss T. F. Silicon nanostructures for photonics and photovoltaics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 19–32 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li B. et al. Fabrication and characterization of patterned single-crystal silicon nanolines. Nano Lett. 8, 92–98 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sansa M., Fernandez-Regulez M., San Paulo A. & Perez-Murano F. Electrical transduction in nanomechanical resonators based on doubly clamped bottom-up silicon nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 243115 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ito T. & Okazaki S. Pushing the limits of lithography. Nature 406, 1027–1031 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Oh T. S., Kim H. J. & Kim D. E. Prevention of hillock formation during micro-machining of silicon by using OTS-SAM and SiO2 coatings. Cirp Annals-Manuf. Techn. 59, 259–262 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  7. Chou S. Y., Keimel C. & Gu J. Ultrafast and direct imprint of nanostructures in silicon. Nature 417, 835–837 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sievila P., Chekurov N. & Tittonen I. The fabrication of silicon nanostructures by focused-ion-beam implantation and TMAH wet etching. Nanotechnology 21, 145301 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li C., Zhao L. R., Mao Y. F., Wu W. G. & Xu J. Focused-ion-beam induced rayleigh-plateau instability for diversiform suspended nanostructure fabrication. Sci. Rep. 5, 8236 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ogino T., Nishimura S. & Shirakashi J. -i. Scratch nanolithography on Si surface using scanning probe microscopy: influence of scanning parameters on groove size. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 712–714 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. Spoldi G. et al. Experimental observation of FIB induced lateral damage on silicon samples. Microelectron. Eng. 86, 548–551 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu Y. Q., Huang H., Zou J., Zhang L. C. & Dell J. M. Nanoscratch-induced phase transformation of monocrystalline Si. Scripta Mater. 63, 847–850 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu B. J. et al. Friction-induced nanofabrication on monocrystalline silicon. Nanotechnology 20, 465303 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guo J. et al. Fabrication mechanism of friction-induced selective etching on Si(100) surface. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7, 152 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kawasegi N. et al. Etch stop of silicon surface induced by tribo-nanolithography. Nanotechnology 16, 1411–1414 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  16. Park J. W., Kawasegi N., Morita N. & Lee D. W. Tribonanolithography of silicon in aqueous solution based on atomic force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1766–1768 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  17. Park J. W., Kawasegi N., Morita N. & Lee, D. W. Mechanical approach to nanomachining of silicon using oxide characteristics based on tribo nanolithography (TNL) in KOH solution. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.-Trans. ASME 126, 801–806 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  18. Zanzucchi P. J. & Duffy M. T. Surface damage and the optical reflectance of single-crystal silicon. Appl. optics 17, 3477–3481 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu B. J., Li X. Y., Dong H. S. & Qian L. M. Mechanical performance of friction-induced protrusive nanostructures on monocrystalline silicon and quartz. Micro Nano Lett. 7, 1270–1273 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  20. Magno R. & Bennett B. R. Nanostructure patterns written in III–V semiconductors by an atomic force microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1855–1857 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  21. Klehn B. & Kunze U. K. SiO2 and Si nanoscale patterning with an atomic force microscope. Superlattice. Microst. 23, 441–444 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  22. Avramescu A. et al. Atomic force microscope nanolithography on SiO2/semiconductor surfaces. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 4057–4060 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  23. Guhathakurta S. & Subramanian A. Effect of hydrofluoric acid in oxidizing acid mixtures on the hydroxylation of silicon surface. J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, 136–146 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  24. Mizuhara K. & Hsu S. M. Tribochemical reaction of oxygen and water on silicon surfaces. Tribol. Ser. 21, 323–328 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  25. Vigil G., Xu Z. H., Steinberg S. & Israelachvili J. Interactions of silica surfaces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 165, 367–385 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  26. Yu J. X., Kim S. H., Yu B. J., Qian L. M. & Zhou Z. R. Role of tribochemistry in nanowear of single-crystalline silicon. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1585–1593 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Park J. W. et al. Characteristics of mask layer on (100) silicon induced by tribo-nanolithography with diamond tip cantilevers based on AFM. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 187, 321–325 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  28. Seidel H., Csepregi L., Heuberger A. & Baumgartel H. Anisotropic etching of crystalline silicon in alkaline-solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 3612–3626 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  29. Xiu Y., Zhu L., Hess D. W. & Wong C. P. Hierarchical silicon etched structures for controlled hydrophobicity/superhydrophobicity. Nano Lett. 7, 3388–3393 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marchetto D. et al. AFM investigation of tribological properties of nano-patterned. Wear 265, 577–582 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  31. Xiao H. et al. Spatial evolution of friction of a textured wafer surface. Friction 1, 92–97 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  32. Yan Y. D. et al. Fabrication of nanochannels with ladder nanostructure at the bottom using AFM nanoscratching method. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 9, 212 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sinha P. M., Valco G., Sharma S., Liu X. W. & Ferrari M. Nanoengineered device for drug delivery application. Nanotechnology 15, 585–589 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  34. Perry J. M., Zhou K., Harms Z. D. & Jacobson S. C. Ion transport in nanofluidic funnels. ACS Nano 4, 3897–3902 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Menard L. D. & Ramsey J. M. Electrokinetically-driven transport of DNA through focused ion beam milled nanofluidic channels. Anal. Chem. 85, 1146–1153 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stroock A. D. et al. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295, 647–651 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Song C. F. et al. Nondestructive tribochemistry-assisted nanofabrication on GaAs surface. Sci. Rep. 5, 9020 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee H. T. et al. Nanometer-scale lithography on H-passivated Si(100) by atomic force microscope in air. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A-Vac. Surf. Films 15, 1451–1454 (1997). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep16472-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES