Abstract
A triethylaluminium(TEAl)-modified Phillips ethylene polymerisation Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst has been developed with two distinct active regions positioned respectively in the inner core and outer shell of the catalyst particle. DRIFTS, EPR, UV-Vis-NIR DRS, STXM, SEM-EDX and GPC-IR studies revealed that the catalyst produces simultaneously two different polymers, i.e., low molecular weight linear-chain polyethylene in the Ti-abundant catalyst particle shell and high molecular weight short-chain branched polyethylene in the Ti-scarce catalyst particle core. Co-monomers for the short-chain branched polymer were generated in situ within the TEAl-impregnated confined space of the Ti-scarce catalyst particle core in close proximity to the active sites that produced the high molecular weight polymer. These results demonstrate that the catalyst particle architecture directly affects polymer composition, offering the perspective of making high-performance polyethylene from a single reactor system using this modified Phillips catalyst.
Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis, in situ oligomerisation, Phillips catalyst, polyethylene, scanning transmission x-ray microscopy
Several years ago at an industrial ethylene polymerisation plant, the in situ generation of co-monomer on a Cr polymerization line using the well-known Cr/Ti/SiO2 Phillips-type catalyst was reported.[1–8] Hence, the co-feeding of 1-hexene was significantly reduced in order to keep a polymer with similar content of co-monomer. The interesting finding was that 1-hexene was the major component, while butene and other oligomers were present in lower concentration. Moreover, the properties of the polyethylene produced were not affected despite the presence of butene. On the contrary, the polymer made even exhibited some improvements. The hypothetical explanation for in situ co-monomer generation was a contamination of the recycling feeds by triethylaluminium (TEAl), as there were several lines with a common recycling section. One of the polymerisation lines was running a Ziegler–Natta catalyst with TEAl as co-catalyst,[9, 10] while the other polymerisation lines ran with a Cr/Ti/SiO2 Phillips-type catalyst without any co-catalyst.
Preliminary tests at both pilot and bench scales confirmed the in situ generation of co-monomer with a Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst and TEAl. The observed phenomena could be confirmed, as illustrated in Figure 1, by performing slurry-phase ethylene polymerisation experiments in a 4 litre-sized semi-batch reactor. The polymerisation conditions were chosen to target the same molecular weight distribution and co-monomer content in the polymer (Table S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information). Hence, 1-hexene was added in one experiment during the polymerisation when the Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst under investigation was tested without TEAl, as no co-monomer was in situ generated in that particular case. In the second experiment, in situ oligomerisation was induced by modification of the catalyst with TEAl. GPC-IR analysis of the polymers produced clearly shows that less co-monomer was incorporated in the short polyethylene chains than in the long chains when it is generated in situ. Consequently, this so-called reverse co-monomer incorporation is enhanced when the co-monomer is generated in situ in the presence of TEAl.[11] This result came as a positive surprise as more co-monomer incorporated in the high molecular weight fraction of the polymer leads to better mechanical properties.[12] Thus the fundamental question was: what are the underlying principles for the production of this polymer using a TEAl-modified Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst?
Figure 1.

Molecular weight distribution (MWD) and short chain branching distribution (SCBD) of the polyethylene produced with the developed Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst in a 4 litre-sized semi-batch reactor, with and without externally added 1-hexene co-monomer. Reverse incorporation of co-monomer into longer polyethylene chains is boosted when co-monomer is in situ generated, while the overall amount of incorporated olefins was kept similar as confirmed by 13C NMR analysis.
Ti has been used in the polymer industry since several decades to lower the molecular weight (MW) and broaden the molecular weight distribution (MWD) of the polymer.[13–18] However, Deslauriers and McDaniel revealed that the addition of Ti to the SiO2 support also leads to an improved distribution of co-monomer in the polymer because the Cr/Ti/SiO2 sites give low molecular weight polymer and have low co-monomer reactivity.[19]
Here, we present a new type of Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst, which was prepared from a commercially available Cr/SiO2 pre-catalyst by selective surface titanation on the catalyst particle’s outer shell and subsequent activation, according to the procedure described in Debras et al.[18] By pre-contacting the catalyst with TEAl, in situ ethylene oligomerisation sites could be generated.[1] Further details on catalyst synthesis can be found in the Supporting Information. Typically, an olefinic co-monomer (i.e., 1-hexene) is added externally to the reaction mixture and has to diffuse through the growing polymer and catalyst material to arrive at the catalytic sites. We envisioned that it would be advantageous if the co-monomer was generated on the TEAl-modified active sites within the Ti-scarce catalyst particle close to the active sites that make a high molecular weight polymer. Therefore, in situ produced olefins (e.g., 1-hexene) would be incorporated into longer polyethylene chains. We show for the first time that we can relate these macroscale polymer properties to nanoscale chemical imaging of (early-stage polymerisation) Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst particles by making use of scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM)[20–22] as an alternative approach to the research of Barzan et al., who studied hydrosilane compounds as co-catalyst.[23]
In a first series of experiments, the catalyst and its polymerisation behaviour were studied using in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy. The obtained DRIFT spectra measured as a function of time-on-stream for the Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst under study are shown in Figure 2 a. The initial spectrum corresponds with a highly dehydroxylated catalyst as testified by the sharp silanol and titanol stretching bands located at 3747 cm−1 and 3722 cm−1, respectively. During the first 5 min, the injection of the TEAl co-catalyst in heptane, for a Al:Cr molar ratio of 2, can be noted by the increase of the methyl and methylene stretching bands of these compounds in the 2800–3000 cm−1 CH stretching region.[24–28] It must be noted that the addition of TEAl did not lead to a significant decrease of the silanol and titanol groups, suggesting that the added TEAl was also consumed for the reduction of Cr6+ to Cr2+, Cr3+ and Cr5+ species,[29–38] for the transformation of a portion of the polymerisation into the oligomerisation active sites as well as for the scavenging of poisons.[1] Flushing of heptane revealed complex vibrational features of TEAl in the CH stretching region, suggesting alkylation of some of the Cr sites. UV-Vis-NIR DRS measurements (Figure 2 d) of the catalyst at this point show that TEAl is inducing a small decrease in the intensity of mono- and polychromate O→Cr6+ CT bands at 36 000, 28 000 and 21 500 cm−1, accompanied by the appearance of the d–d bands at 16 000 and 10 000 cm−1 due to the 4A2g→4T2g transition of Cr3+Oh and the 5Eg→5T2g transition of Cr2+Oh.[39, 40] EPR spectra of Cr species on oxide supports are reported to show three distinct signals, that is, β, γ and δ.[41, 42] EPR data (Figure 2 e and f) of the fresh catalyst shows only a γ-signal attributed to axially symmetric [CrO4]3− species (with gxx=gyy=1.970 and gzz=1.890). Besides the reduction of Cr6+/5+, as testified by the appearance of a δ-signal from dispersed Cr3+ ions (geff≈3.7–6),[41, 42] reaction with TEAl is causing the appearance of new, axially symmetric (gxx=gyy=1.980 and gzz=1.915) and rhombic Cr5+ species (gxx=1.980, gyy=1.969, gzz=1.922).[41, 42] Furthermore, TEAl is not reducing Ti4+ species as confirmed by the absence of the EPR signal belonging to the isolated Ti3+ ions.[43–45] After removal of heptane, ethylene and H2 were fed into the DRIFTS cell followed by the immediate start of the polymerisation of ethylene. Characteristic polyethylene C–H stretching and deformation vibrations show a rapid rise in the 2800–3000 cm−1 region and at 1460 cm−1, respectively.[24–26] The intermolecular interaction of the growing polyethylene chain with the silanol groups caused a decrease of the bands at 3745 cm−1 and 3720 cm−1 and their broadening and red shift to respectively 3695 cm−1 and 3650 cm−1. After the reaction, the UV-Vis-NIR DRS spectrum shows a further increase of the d–d bands of Cr in lower oxidation states at the expense of O→Cr6+ CT bands. The EPR δ-signal assigned to dispersed Cr3+ species is even more pronounced, while the γ-signal shows a further distortion of the axially symmetric Cr5+ species, present after modification with TEAl, into new rhombic Cr5+ species (gxx=1.984, gyy=1.976, gzz=1.950).
Figure 2.

a) Time evolution of the DRIFT spectra of the Cr/Ti/SiO2 Phillips catalyst under study in the ethylene polymerisation reaction measured at 373 K and 1 bar. The catalyst was pre-contacted with TEAl during the first 5 min, while the actual feed of the ethylene gas reactant mixture was started after 15 min. The first spectrum shows (blue) the activated catalyst, middle (grey) the modification with TEAl, while the last spectrum corresponds with the catalyst containing polyethylene (red). The samples at these stages were further examined by SEM-EDX, STXM, EPR and UV-Vis-NIR DRS. b) SEM image of the fresh Cr/Ti/SiO2 Phillips catalyst before the addition of TEAl and polymerisation of ethylene. c) SEM image of the fragmented polyethylene/catalyst mixture after the in situ polymerisation of ethylene in the DRIFTS cell. EDX elemental analysis is presented in the pie charts (as wt % values). d) UV-Vis-NIR DRS spectra show reduction of mono- and polychromate species in the fresh catalyst by TEAl and ethylene. Instrumental artefact is marked with #. e) X-band EPR spectra showing the δ-signal attributed to dispersed Cr3+ species. Fe impurity is marked with *. f) X-band EPR spectra showing the γ-signal from several Cr5+ species.
It is well-known that at the start of the ethylene polymerisation the reactants diffuse into the pores and the crevices of the polymerisation catalyst. During the propagation step, the growing polymer causes fragmentation of the catalyst particle. This fragmentation was evidenced by the SEM images of the fresh catalyst particles and the particles after polymerisation in the DRIFTS cell (Figure 2 b and c).[46–48] Due to the relatively mild ethylene partial pressure of 0.45 bar, the fragmentation of the catalyst particles was still at an early stage. However, the selection of these experimental conditions offered us the unique opportunity to study the ethylene polymerisation process at the initial steps of the fragmentation of the catalyst material induced during the formation of polyethylene.
As DRIFTS, EPR and UV-Vis-NIR DRS are bulk techniques, which give only an averaged set of information over a large amount of material, it is important to call in another more local characterisation method. In the second series of experiments, we have performed STXM as this method is a less invasive technique than energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis commonly attached to a SEM instrument (Figure S4 and S5) with respect to the sensitive polyethylene material. STXM offers nanoscale spatial information on the electronic and chemical structure of the catalyst and catalyst/polymer materials. Figure 3 a shows the X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectra of all of the elements of the fresh Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst, collected using soft X-rays in the range of 450–1860 eV. The Si K-edge XAS spectrum in the spectral range from 1835-1860 eV is indicative for Td coordinated Si4+ present within the SiO2 support. Regarding the O K-edge in the spectral region of 525–580 eV, it was possible to distinguish between the O K-edge XAS spectrum of SiO2 and that of the epoxy resin, which was used for embedding the catalyst particle. Indeed, the O K-edge of SiO2 shows a 1 eV blue shift to 538 eV and a higher post-edge feature at 560 eV. Interestingly, the Ti L2,3-edge XAS spectrum in the range of 452–477 eV shows separated L3 and L2 regions due to the spin–orbit coupling of Ti 2p core electrons. Compared to reference spectra,[27, 49] it can be concluded that Ti4+ is in an Oh coordination. Ti4+ does not belong to TiO2 crystallites, but is a part of a mixed amorphous oxide support of titania–silica showing no ordering or crystalline phases, which is confirmed by XRD (Figure S8).
Figure 3.

a) X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data of the chemical elements present in the fresh Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst under study: Si K-edge (grey), Ti L2,3-edge (blue), O K-edge from the SiO2 support (red), O K-edge from the epoxy resin (orange) and Cr L2,3-edge (purple) with a smoothed spectrum (black). The spectra were integrated over the examined region of the entire catalyst particle for achieving the best signal-to-noise ratio. b) Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) elemental maps of the fresh Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst particle with c) an overlay of the STXM elemental maps. d) Al K-edge and elemental map of Ti (blue), Cr (purple) and Al (green) of the catalyst after the wet impregnation with TEAl for a nominal Al:Cr ratio of 1.
The most challenging aspect of the performed STXM study is the low Cr content of the Cr/Ti/SiO2 Phillips catalyst. To the best of our knowledge, we present in Figure 3 a the first Cr L2,3-edge XAS spectrum of Phillips-type catalyst using STXM. The spin–orbit splitting of Cr causes distinct L2 and L3 regions in the spectral range of 572–592 eV. In comparison with the literature reference spectra,[50] it can be concluded that Cr is most probably in a distorted Oh state in the form of a dispersed Cr2O3-like phase. The oxidation number of the activated catalyst, calcined in dry O2, is expected to be +6. Therefore, the lower oxidation state of 3+ can be explained by the exposure of the activated catalyst to air, water and epoxy resin during the required preparation procedure for the STXM measurements, where Cr6+ has been partially converted into Cr3+.
Besides a detailed analysis of the measured XAS data, the STXM technique gives the opportunity of elemental mapping of a sample at the nanoscale. By subtracting a pre-edge image from the absorption edge spectral image it is possible to acquire an elemental map of each element under investigation. Using this procedure it was possible to obtain Figure 3 b, which shows the elemental distribution of a Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst particle, including a chemical element overlay map (Figure 3 c).
The STXM Si and O maps show the mesoporous structure, which can also be inferred from N2 physisorption data (Figure S1) of the catalyst material. The STXM Ti map shows that Ti species are mostly located at the surface of the Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst particle forming a core–shell structure, which is in line with the applied preparation route and impregnation of the titanate ester. On the other hand, Cr species were found to be present more evenly throughout the whole catalyst particle. This non-uniform distribution of Ti and Cr is considered to be essential in the formation of at least two different types of active sites on a single particle, one mainly positioned in the Ti-abundant and the other one dominantly present in Ti-scarce catalyst particle regions, which are able to produce different types of polyethylene. Moreover, the elemental map of the catalyst sample pre-treated with TEAl for the Al:Cr ratio of 1 (Figure 3 d), shows that Al is well-dispersed into the catalyst core, which indicates that ethylene oligomerisation sites are neighbouring the (Ti-scarce) ethylene polymerisation sites.
In order to evaluate this working hypothesis, we have conducted a detailed STXM study on the Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst after treating with the TEAl co-catalyst and ethylene feeding at 373 K and 1 bar in the in situ DRIFTS cell. The overall XAS image of the polyethylene/catalyst particle, given in Figure S9, shows a clear start of the catalyst fragmentation process. As with the fresh Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst, the XAS spectra of the Ti L2,3- and Cr L2,3-edges were measured and are shown in Figure S10. After ethylene polymerisation, the Ti4+ remains Oh coordinated, while Cr species were still detectable after reaction. The XAS spectrum of the Cr L2,3 edge shows that Cr is distorted Oh coordinated in the form of dispersed Cr2O3.
One of the most interesting aspects of this study has been the investigation of the absorption edge of the carbon species of the catalyst/polymer sample, probed in the energy range of 281–297 eV. Due to the distinctively different C K-edge XAS spectra it is possible to distinguish the carbon species of the produced polyethylene and the epoxy resin used for sample preparation. Figure 4 a shows the elemental maps of the Ti, Cr and C together with a map overlay (Figure 4 b). It was found that Ti remains located close to the surface of the catalyst particle except in the cracks of the fragmenting catalyst particle. In contrast, the Cr species are dispersed throughout the entire catalyst particle in the form of clusters, while the produced polyethylene is detected both on the outer surface of the catalyst particle and in the pores within the catalyst particle core with the highest optical density in the cracks of the fragmenting catalyst particle.
Figure 4.

a) Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) elemental maps of the Phillips Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst particle after ethylene polymerisation at 373 K and 1 bar. Carbon from the epoxy resin (orange), carbon from the polyethylene (green), Ti (blue) and Cr (purple). b) An overlay of the STXM elemental maps. c) XAS data of the C K-edge from the PE layer on the outer rim of the catalyst particle (top) and of the PE within the cracks of the inner core of the catalyst particle (bottom).
In order to investigate in detail the influence of the active polymerisation sites in the different regions within the catalyst particle, a more detailed analysis of the C K-edge in different parts of the particle has been performed. Two main different types of polyethylene were detected, as shown in Figure 4 c. Besides the characteristic C1s→σ*C-H/Ryd transitions at 287.5 and 288 eV of the CH2 groups of polyethylene species, inside the pores and the fragmentation cracks of the catalyst, the produced polyethylene shows an absorption spectrum very similar to the spectrum of the reference polypropylene sample with a more distinct C1s→σ*C-C transition band.[51–55] Furthermore, detailed analysis of the C1s→σ*C-H/Ryd bands shows a small widening towards lower energies caused by the C1s→σ*C-H transition at 285.1 eV of the CH3 groups. These are the indications of the higher amount of branching of the polyethylene induced by the co-polymerisation of the ethylene with the in situ generated ethylene oligomers, such as 1-hexene, inside the confined space of the catalyst pores. Furthermore, the low intensity band at 285.2 eV assigned to C1s→π*C=C indicates the presence of olefin oligomers still adsorbed or trapped in the catalyst. It can be concluded that the active sites in the outer rim of the catalyst particle, containing predominantly both Ti and Cr, produce more linear type of polyethylene with a lesser amount of branching than the core of the catalyst particle, which contain almost exclusively Cr. In this respect, it is important to mention that in the studies of the co-polymerisation of ethylene with light alpha olefins, such as 1-hexene,[1] it is known that the presence of Ti on the Phillips catalyst tends to inhibit the incorporation of the co-monomer. Moreover, Ti could also inhibit co-monomer in situ generation and lead to a more pronounced reverse co-monomer incorporation, as co-monomer will mainly be generated in Ti-scarce areas where longer chains are produced.
This observation is in line with our data as the two distinct regions of the Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst particle clearly had different catalytic behaviour as the Ti-scarce active sites inside the core tend to induce the branching of the polyethylene chain, while the Ti-rich active sites inside the shell of the catalyst particle give a more linear type of polyethylene. This gives clear experimental proof of the position of the active sites responsible for the in situ oligomerisation of ethylene and the subsequent incorporation of the in situ produced light olefins, such as 1-hexene, into the growing polyethylene chain (Figure 5). We anticipate that the two different types of polyethylene produced by this bifunctional ethylene oligomerisation-polymerisation catalyst offer a clear perspective into advancing the production of an industrially important polyethylene with a simple Phillips-type catalyst from a single reactor system.
Figure 5.

A) Schematic representation of polymerisation and oligomerisation active sites of a TEAl-modified shell–titanated Cr/Ti/SiO2 Phillips-type catalyst. a) TEAl (orange ▵) is transforming some of the Cr polymerisation sites (yellow •) into b) ethylene oligomerisation sites (orange •). c) Oligomerisation sites within the Ti-rich particle shell are producing less oligomers, that is, 1-hexene (C6) and 1-butene (C4). Therefore, nearby PE polymerisation sites that are making shorter chains in comparison to polymerisation active sites within the Ti-scarce particle core,[1] incorporate low amount of co-monomer. Oligomerisation sites within the Ti-scarce particle core are very efficient for the oligomerisation of ethylene, producing 1-hexene predominantly. Hence, PE polymerisation sites close-by, which are producing longer chains in comparison to polymerisation active sites close to Ti,[1] incorporate a higher amount of co-monomer. This catalyst generates polyethylene with more co-monomer in the long chains, that is, reverse co-monomer incorporation. B) If 1-hexene is externally added into the reactor using a pristine Cr/Ti/SiO2 catalyst (d), co-monomer concentration is similar for all active sites, which lead to a typical Cr-based polyethylene with more commoner in short chains (e).
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Total Research and Technology Feluy and Total SA. We acknowledge M. Versluijs-Helder and H. Meeldijk, both from Utrecht University (UU), for performing SEM-EDX and ultramicrotomy, respectively. The authors thank CLS for providing beamtime and the 10ID-1 beamline scientists and the UU beamtime team, including M. al Samarai, K. Cats, S. Kalirai and R. Oord, for help in acquiring the STXM data. M. Delgado Jaime (UU) is acknowledged for the use of the Blueprint XAS program, while G. van Hauwermeiren and J. Decrom (Total Research and Technology, Feluy) are acknowledged for catalyst preparations.
Supporting Information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
miscellaneous_information
References
- 1.McDaniel MP. Adv. Catal. 2010;53:123–606. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Groppo E, Lamberti C, Bordiga S, Spoto G, Zecchina A. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:115–184. doi: 10.1021/cr040083s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weckhuysen BM, Schoonheydt RA. Catal. Today. 1999;51:215–221. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zecchina A, Groppo E. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A. 2012;468:2087–2098. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheng R, Liu Z, Zhong L, He X, Qiu P, Terano M, Eisen MS, Scott SL, Liu B. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2013;257:135–202. [Google Scholar]
- 6.McGuinness DS, Davies NW, Horne J, Ivanov I. Organometallics. 2010;29:6111–6116. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hogan JP, Banks RL. 1958. US2825721.
- 8.Hogan JP, Banks RL. 1960. US2951816.
- 9.Wilke G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5000–5008. doi: 10.1002/anie.200330056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2003;115:5150–5159. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Böhm LL. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5010–5030. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2003;115:5162–5183. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Soares JBP, McKenna TFL. Polyolefin Reaction Engineering. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2012. pp. 17–27. A co-polymer with reverse co-monomer incorporation shows an increasing α-olefin content with increasing co-polymer molecular weight, meaning a higher incorporation into longer than into shorter polymer chains. For more details we refer to the following textbook. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Böhm LL, Enderle HF, Fleifßner M. Adv. Mater. 1992;4:234–238. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cheng R, Xu C, Liu Z, Dong Q, He X, Fang Y, Terano M, Hu Y, Pullukat TJ, Liu B. J. Catal. 2010;273:103–115. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pullukat TJ, Hoff RE, Shida M. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. Ed. 1980;18:2857–2866. [Google Scholar]
- 15.McDaniel MP, Welch MB, Dreiling MJ. J. Catal. 1983;82:118–126. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Conway SJ, Falconer JW, Rochester CH. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1. 1989;85:71–78. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Conway SJ, Falconer JW, Rochester CH, Downs GW. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1. 1989;85:1841–1851. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Debras G, Dath J-P. 1998. EP0882743 B1.
- 19.Deslauriers PJ, McDaniel MP. J. Polym. Sci. Part A. 2007;45:3135–3149. [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Groot FMF, de Smit E, van Schooneveld MM, Aramburo LR, Weckhuysen BM. ChemPhysChem. 2010;11:951–962. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200901023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beale AM, Jacques SDM, Weckhuysen BM. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:4656–4672. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00089b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22a.Weckhuysen BM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:4910–4943. doi: 10.1002/anie.200900339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2009;121:5008–5043. [Google Scholar]
- 22b.Buurmans ILC, Weckhuysen BM. Nat. Chem. 2012;4:873–886. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barzan C, Gianolio D, Groppo E, Lamberti C, Monteil V, Quadrelli EA, Bordiga S. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:17277–17282. doi: 10.1002/chem.201303156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Socrates G. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts. Chichester: Wiley; 2004. pp. 259–282. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Groppo E, Lamberti C, Bordiga S, Spoto G, Zecchina A. J. Catal. 2006;240:172–181. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lamberti C, Zecchina A, Groppo E, Bordiga S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:4951–5001. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00117a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guttmann P, Bittencourt C, Rehbein S, Umek P, Ke X, Van Tendeloo G, Ewels CP, Schneider G. Nat. Photonics. 2011;6:25–29. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nenu CN, Groppo E, Lamberti C, Beale AM, Visser T, Zecchina A, Weckhuysen BM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:1465–1468. doi: 10.1002/anie.200602593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2007;119:1487–1490. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu B, Šindelář P, Fang Y, Hasebe K, Terano M. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2005;238:142–150. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xia W, Liu B, Fang Y, Hasebe K, Terano M. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2006;256:301–308. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xia W, Liu B, Fang Y, Fujitani T, Taniike T, Terano M. Appl. Catal. A. 2010;389:186–194. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lunsford JH, Fu S-L, Myers DL. J. Catal. 1988;111:231–234. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rebenstorf B. J. Mol. Catal. 1989;56:170–182. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Myers DL, Lunsford JH. J. Catal. 1986;99:140–148. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Myers DL, Lunsford JH. J. Catal. 1985;92:260–271. [Google Scholar]
- 36a.Conley MP, Delley MF, Siddiqi G, Lapadula G, Norsic S, Monteil V, Safonova OV, Copéret C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:1872–1876. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2014;126:1903–1907. [Google Scholar]
- 36b.Conley MP, Delley MF, Siddiqi G, Lapadula G, Norsic S, Monteil V, Safonova OV, Copéret C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:6670–6670. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angew. Chem. 2015;127:6771–6771. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Delley MF, Conley MP, Copéret C. Catal. Lett. 2014;144:805–808. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Delley MF, Núñez-Zarur F, Conley MP, Comas-Vives A, Siddiqi G, Norsic S, Monteil V, Safonova OV, Copéret C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:11624–11629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405314111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Weckhuysen BM, De Ridder LM, Schoonheydt RA. J. Phys. Chem. 1993;97:4756–4763. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Weckhuysen BM, Verberckmoes AA, Buttiens AL, Schoonheydt RA. J. Phys. Chem. 1994;98:579–584. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weckhuysen BM, De Ridder LM, Grobet PJ, Schoonheydt RA. J. Phys. Chem. 1995;99:320–326. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weckhuysen BM, Schoonheydt RA, Mabbs FE, Collison D. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1996;92:2431–2436. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Anpo M, Che M, Fubini B, Garrone E. Top. Catal. 1999;8:189–198. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bal R, Chaudhari K, Srinivas D, Sivasanker S, Ratnasamy P. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2000;162:199–207. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chaudhari K, Srinivas D, Ratnasamy P. J. Catal. 2001;203:25–32. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Conner WC, Webb SW, Spanne P, Jones KW. Macromolecules. 1990;23:4742–4747. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jones KW, Spanne P, Webb SW, Conner WC, Beyerlein RA, Reagan WJ, Dautzenberg FM. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B. 1991;56/57:427–432. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zheng X, Smit M, Chadwick JC, Loos J. Macromolecules. 2005;38:4673–4678. [Google Scholar]
- 49.de Groot FMF, Fuggle JC, Thole BT, Sawatzky GA. Phys. Rev. B. 1990;41:928–937. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.41.928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nenu CN, van Lingen JNJ, de Groot FMF, Koningsberger DC, Weckhuysen BM. Chem. Eur. J. 2006;12:4756–4763. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ade HW, Smith AP, Zhuang GR, Kirz J, Rightor EG, Hitchcock AP. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1996;84:53–72. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dhez O, Ade HW, Urquhart SG. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2003;128:85–96. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Urquhart SG, Hitchcock AP, Smith AP, Ade HW, Rightor EG. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997;101:2267–2276. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Urquhart SG, Hitchcock AP, Smith AP, Ade HW, Lidy W, Rightor EG, Mitchell GE. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1999;100:119–135. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hähner G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006;35:1244–1255. doi: 10.1039/b509853j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
miscellaneous_information
