Abstract
Polyunsaturated phospholipids are common in biological membranes and affect the lateral structure of bilayers. We have examined how saturated sphingomyelin (SM; palmitoyl and stearoyl SM (PSM and SSM, respectively)) and phosphatidylcholine (PC; dipalmitoyl PC and 1-palmitoyl-2-stearoyl PC (DPPC and PSPC, respectively)) segregate laterally to form ordered gel phases in increasingly unsaturated PC bilayers (sn-1: 16:0 and sn-2: 18:1...22:6; or sn-1 and sn-2: 18:1…22:6). The formation of gel phases was determined from the lifetime analysis of trans-parinaric acid. Using calorimetry, we also determined gel phase formation by PSM and DPPC in unsaturated PC mixed bilayers. Comparing PSM with DPPC, we observed that PSM formed a gel phase with less order than DPPC at comparable bilayer concentrations. The same was true when SSM was compared with PSPC. Furthermore, we observed that at equal saturated phospholipid concentration, the gel phases formed were less ordered in unsaturated PCs having 16:0 in sn-1, as compared to PCs having unsaturated acyl chains in both sn-1 and sn-2. The gel phases formed by the saturated phospholipids in unsaturated PC bilayers did not appear to achieve properties similar to pure saturated phospholipid bilayers, suggesting that complete lateral phase separation did not occur. Based on scanning calorimetry analysis, the melting of the gel phases formed by PSM and DPPC in unsaturated PC mixed bilayers (at 45 mol % saturated phospholipid) had low cooperativity and hence most likely were of mixed composition, in good agreement with trans-parinaric acid lifetime data. We conclude that both interfacial properties of the saturated phospholipids and their chain length, as well as the presence of 16:0 in sn-1 of the unsaturated PCs and the total number of cis unsaturations and acyl chain length (18 to 22) of the unsaturated PCs, all affected the formation of gel phases enriched in saturated phospholipids, under the conditions used.
Introduction
The role of lipids in the formation and maintenance of membrane lateral structure is of major interest, because it has been shown that certain membrane functions require ordered domains or platforms for optimal activity (1, 2, 3, 4). The lipid raft hypothesis suggests that sphingomyelin (SM), glycosphingolipids, and cholesterol form dynamic, transient, and possibly very small domains that are functionally important (5, 6, 7, 8). Many model membrane studies have focused on how saturated phosphatidylcholines (PCs) or SMs form ordered domains in unsaturated PC environments (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Pertinent ternary phase diagrams have also been reported (15, 16, 17, 18, 19), which more quantitatively describe phase boundaries, phase coexistence regions, and phase compositions.
The formation of ordered domains by different SMs in 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) bilayers has been examined extensively (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25), and the relationship between SM structure and domain-forming properties has been discussed extensively (26). However, the role of the unsaturated phospholipids in determining the properties of the more ordered PCs and SMs has received less attention, and complete ternary phase diagrams have been published for only a very limited set of unsaturated PCs. It has been shown that when the phospholipids have acyl chains that are highly polyunsaturated (e.g., with docosahexaenoic acid; 22:6), these may separate into cholesterol-devoid domains on their own (for recent reviews, see (27, 28)). It is likely that cholesterol fails to interact favorably with polyunsaturated phospholipids because attractive van der Waals forces will not form efficiently between the planar sterol skeleton and the rough surface of the cis-double-bond-rich acyl chains. The unfavorable interaction between cholesterol and polyunsaturated phospholipid acyl chains also leads to a decreased bilayer solubility of cholesterol (29), a decreased bilayer affinity of cholesterol (30), and a potential displacement into the bilayer center of cholesterol itself (31). Even though cholesterol is not compatible with polyunsaturated acyl chains, 1-palmitoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PDPC) is apparently partially miscible with SM-rich domains and is thus able to interact with saturated phospholipids (32) and even to affect the cholesterol content of such domains. However, phosphatidylethanolamines with one saturated and one polyunsaturated acyl chain apparently phase-separate more efficiently from SM domains (33, 34), suggesting that headgroup properties also affect miscibility.
In an effort to better understand the role of the unsaturated PCs in stabilizing/destabilizing ordered domains formed by a saturated PC or SM, Bakht and colleagues (35) examined domain stability using a TEMPO-based quenching assay in which diphenylhexatriene was the probe. They observed that the thermal stability of ordered dipalmitoyl PC domains was highest in bilayers containing polyunsaturated (20:4/20:4-PC) or methyl-branched (diphytanoyl) PCs and that it was significantly reduced when the bilayers contained 16:0/18:1-PC. The conclusion was that polyunsaturated phospholipid species had less ideal miscibility with the ordered phospholipids compared to 16:0/18:1-PC. The miscibility of mono- and polyunsaturated phosphatidylethanolamines with SM was also shown to be highly nonideal, leading to extensive phase separation, especially with the polyunsaturated species (34).
In this study, we examined the miscibility of saturated SMs (palmitoyl SM (PSM) and stearoyl SM (SSM)) and PCs (1,2-dipalmitoyl PC and 1-palmitoyl-2-stearoyl PC (DPPC and PSPC, respectively)) in bilayers formed from mono- or polyunsaturated PCs. The molecular structures of all phospholipids used in this study are shown in Schemes S1–S3 in the Supporting Material. Immiscibility was deduced from the segregation into laterally ordered domains (gel phase) by the saturated phospholipids, as their concentration in the bilayer increased, and as the unsaturated PCs became increasingly polyunsaturated. The gel phase formation was detected either using time-resolved analysis of trans-parinaric acid (tPA) fluorescence, or DSC. Time-resolved tPA fluorescence is a powerful method for demonstrating the presence of ordered domains (or phases) in a fluid bilayer. First, tPA, because of its all-trans nature, prefers to partition into more ordered phases compared to more disordered phases (36, 37). Second, the quantum yield of tPA increases significantly when tPA is localized in an ordered phase (36), in part because of less diffusion-dependent quenching (by oxygen and water). Although tPA emission decay is multicomponential, the longest lifetime component of tPA is a sensitive indicator of the appearance/disappearance of an ordered phase (as a function of concentration or temperature). However, lifetime data should be interpreted with some caution, because probe diffusion (between phases) during the excited-state lifetime will affect the observed lifetime. This effect is likely to be more significant if the ordered phase is composed of very small domains with significant molecular diffusion, or if the excited state lifetime is sufficiently long so that the probe may partition between ordered and more disordered phases.
We found that the saturated SMs and PCs were partially miscible with all the polyunsaturated fatty acid-containing PCs tested, in the sense that complete phase segregation was not observed. Increasing the chain length of the saturated phospholipids from 16:0 to 18:0 led to an increased formation of a gel phase as the unsaturated acyl chains were increasingly unsaturated. Gel phases formed by SMs appeared to be less ordered than those formed by the matching PCs, as deduced from the longest lifetime component of tPA, and from the cooperativity of the gel phase melting by DSC. Only in the most unsaturated PC bilayers did a gel phase with properties similar to a pure gel phase coexist with a less ordered mixed phase of saturated phospholipid and unsaturated PC.
Materials and Methods
Materials
The unsaturated (POPC, 1-palmitoyl-2-linoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PLPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (PAPC), PDPC, DOPC, 1,2,-dilinoleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC), 1,2,-diarachidonoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DAPC), and 1,2,-didocosahexaeneoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DDPC)) as well as the saturated DPPC and PSPC were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). PSM and SSM were purified from natural egg SM and brain SM, respectively (Avanti Polar Lipids) by preparative reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (5 μm particle size, column dimensions of 250 mm × 21.1 mm, Supelco Discovery C18 (Bellefonte, PA)), using 100% methanol (Rathburn Chemicals, Walkerburn, Scotland) as an eluent. The identity of PSM and SSM was verified by mass spectrometry (Bruker HCT Ultra Ion Trap, Billerica, MA) and DSC (Tm:s were compared with literature values), and their purity was verified by analytical high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-C18 column eluted with methanol) and DSC. tPA was synthesized from methyl linolenate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as described previously (38). The identity of tPA was verified by mass spectrometry and by spectral analysis. The purity was ascertained using analytical high-performance liquid chromatography. Dry tPA was stored at −87°C in argon-purged vials containing 0.5 mol % butylated hydroxytoluene. Cholesterol was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Stock solutions of phospholipids and cholesterol were made by dissolving the lipids in argon-purged methanol to ∼2 mM concentration. tPA was dissolved in argon-purged methanol before use (remade every week). All unsaturated PC stock solutions were checked for oxidation products monthly, using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Liposomes were only made from lipid stock solutions having intact polyunsaturated phospholipids and tPA. The lipids were stored at −20°C and warmed to ambient temperature before use. Water was used as the aqueous solvent in all studies and was purified by reverse osmosis through a Millipore UF Plus water-purification system. The resistivity of the water was 18.2 MΩcm.
Preparation of multilamellar vesicles
Multilamellar lipid vesicles (MLVs) used in fluorescence-lifetime measurements were prepared to a final lipid concentration of 0.2 mM and to a lipid/tPA ratio of 200:1. Various amounts of lipids were mixed and dried under a constant flow of argon at 40°C. The lipid mixtures were dispersed in argon-purged water and heated to a temperature above the chain-melting temperature (Tm) of the saturated phospholipid (to 65°C). The lipid suspension was then kept at this temperature for 30 min, vortexed, and sonicated with a FinnSonic M3 Bath Sonicator (40 kHz, ultrasonic power 80 W, FinnSonic Oy, Lahti, Finland) for 5 min to generate MLVs. All samples were kept shielded from light at 23°C before measurements. The integrity of polyunsaturated phospholipids in the MLV preparations was checked occasionally and no significant degradation of unsaturated PCs were observed in the samples from which data was used in our figures or tables. The size distribution of liposomes in the MLV preparations was also analyzed for some systems, using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS. The MLV preparations were polydisperse and large (for typical PDI and Z-average values of MLVs prepared from PSPC and unsaturated PCs, see Table S9).
Fluorescence experiments
The fluorescence-lifetime analysis was performed at 23°C with a FluoTime 100-spectrofluorimeter, using a PicoHarp 300E time-correlated single photon counting module (PicoQuant GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The tPA was excited with a 298 nm LED laser source (PLS300, PicoQuant) and the emission was measured above 350 nm. The samples were kept under constant stirring during the measurements. Data were analyzed with FluoFit Pro software (PicoQuant). Data were fitted to contain two (or sometimes three) lifetime components, whichever gave best unbiased residual plots and Χ2 closest to 1. The average lifetime was calculated as described in (39).
DSC
MLVs for DSC were prepared by mixing the desired lipids (saturated phospholipids together with unsaturated PCs, at 45 mol % saturated phospholipid) and evaporating the solvent under a stream of nitrogen. The samples were then kept under vacuum for 1 h to remove residual solvent. The resulting lipid films were hydrated with argon-purged MQ-water at 65°C for 30 min, followed by 5-min bath sonication at 65°C. Samples were cooled to room temperature and degassed for 10 min with a ThermoVac instrument (Microcal, Northampton, MA) before being loaded into the Microcal VP-DSC instrument. The saturated phospholipid concentration in the DSC cell was ∼1 mM. Five up- and downscans were collected for each composition. Data analysis was performed using Origin software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA).
Results
We examined the lateral segregation of PSM, DPPC, SSM, and PSPC in mono- and polyunsaturated PC bilayers as a function of bilayer composition at 23°C. Segregation was determined from the formation of an increasingly ordered gel phase, as deduced from the lifetime analysis of tPA fluorescence in the bilayer. We report both the intensity-weighted average lifetime (which takes into account the fractional contribution of all lifetime components (Figs. 1 and 2)) and the longest lifetime component (which reports from the most ordered phase present, but does not give information about the amount of phase, Figs. S1–S4 and Tables S1–S8). Because we do not know how tPA partitions among saturated and unsaturated phospholipids, we cannot use lifetime components (and preexponential factors) to calculate the amount of phases present in different systems. Finally, we provide thermograms of PSM and DPPC in mixed bilayers containing the unsaturated PCs (Figs. 3 and 4 and Table S10). For clarity, we refer to all PCs with different sn-1/sn-2 acyl chains as mixed chain PC and to those with identical sn-1/sn-2 acyl chains as equal chain PC.
Figure 1.
Intensity-weighted average lifetime of tPA in unsaturated phosphatidylcholine bilayers containing increasing concentrations of PSM, DPPC, SSM, or PSPC. Values are averages from n = 2–3 ± SE. The dotted horizontal line in the top of each panel indicates the intensity-weighted average lifetime of tPA in a pure phospholipid bilayer of the respective saturated phospholipid. Left panels show data for mixed chain PC bilayers and right panels for equal chain PC bilayers. Panels from top to bottom are for PSM (A and B), DPPC (C and D), SSM (E and F), and PSPC (G and H), respectively. All compositions are indicated in the legend boxes and by the x axis legend. To see this figure in color, go online.
Figure 2.
Intensity-weighted average lifetime of tPA in unsaturated phosphatidylcholine bilayers containing increasing concentrations of PSM, DPPC, SSM, or PSPC. Values from Fig. 1 are replotted to show individual panels with a single unsaturated phosphatidylcholine and all four saturated phospholipids. Panels show data for the following bilayers: (A) POPC, (B) PLPC, (C) PAPC, (D) PDPC, (E) DOPC, (F) DLPC, (G) DAPC, and (H) DDPC. Values are averages from n = 3 ± SE. All compositions are indicated in the upper left corner of each panel. To see this figure in color, go online.
Figure 3.
Scanning calorimetry thermograms of pure PSM and mixed unsaturated PC bilayers with PSM (at 45 mol %). Each trace is the fifth upscan. Thermograms have been normalized to the concentration of PSM present. Each composition is indicated next to the trace. The vertical dotted line indicates the Tm of pure PSM melting.
Figure 4.
Scanning calorimetry thermograms of pure DPPC and mixed unsaturated PC bilayers with DPPC (at 45 mol %). Each trace is the fifth upscan. Thermograms have been normalized to the concentration of DPPC present. Each composition is indicated next to the trace. The vertical dotted line indicates the Tm of pure DPPC melting. The minor peak next to the main DPPC melting comes from the pretransition of DPPC.
Mixed bilayers containing mono- and polyunsaturated PCs and PSM
When PSM was added to mixed chain PCs, the average lifetime of tPA increased very moderately as the PSM concentration increased (Fig. 1 A). Above 30 mol % PSM, the average lifetime increased more for PDPC bilayers than for the other mixed chain PC bilayers, but even at 45 mol % PSM, it remained at 20 ns, well below the average lifetime of tPA in pure PSM bilayers (∼44 ns; shown as the dotted line in Fig. 1 A). These results suggest that although PSM formed a gel phase in these unsaturated PCs at sufficiently high concentration, these were not very densely packed or highly ordered (at least not when compared to pure PSM bilayers at the given temperature). The longest lifetime component never exceeded 40 ns in these mixed bilayers (Fig. S1), whereas pure PSM bilayers at 23°C had a longest lifetime component of ∼67 ns. The longest lifetime component also revealed that the ordered phase started to appear at above 15 mol % and that the onset was unaffected by the sn-2 acyl chain composition (Fig. S1). For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Table S1.
The formation of gel phases by PSM was much enhanced in the equal chain PCs bilayers (Fig. 1 B). As unsaturation increased in the equal chain PCs, progressively less PSM was needed to increase the average tPA lifetime, suggesting that the miscibility of PSM in equal chain PC bilayers decreased as the unsaturation increased, resulting in the increased formation of PSM-enriched gel phases. The longest lifetime component reached values of 40–45 ns (at the highest PSM concentrations; Fig. S1) but did not reach the value of pure PSM bilayers. The onset of PSM segregation occurred at PSM concentrations above 15 mol % for all equal chain PCs except DDPC (at 10 mol %; Fig. S1). For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Table S2.
A comparison of the PSM gel phase formation in mixed chain and equal chain PC bilayers clearly demonstrated that the gel phase order was higher when PSM was mixed with equal chain PC as compared to the mixed chain PCs.
Mixed bilayers containing mono- and polyunsaturated PCs and DPPC
Even though DPPC is not the best acyl chain match for PSM (40), we used it for comparison, because DPPC is widely used in many model membrane studies and the data on DPPC properties are plentiful. Compared to PSM in mixed chain PC bilayers, the average lifetime of tPA increased to higher values and at somewhat lower concentrations when DPPC was mixed in mixed chain PC bilayers (Fig. 1 C). The highest average lifetimes at 45 mol % (around 30 ns) were still markedly lower than the average lifetime measured in pure DPPC bilayers (∼51 ns). The longest lifetime component reached 50 ns in all equal chain PC bilayer systems (at 45 mol %) but was shorter than the 75 ns measured for pure DPPC bilayers. The onset of gel phase formation occurred at DPPC concentrations >15 mol % (Fig. S2), similarly as seen with PSM (Fig. S1). For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Table S3.
In equal chain PC bilayers, DPPC formed gel phases that gave longer average lifetimes for tPA (Fig. 1 D) when compared to each mixed chain PC bilayer (Fig. 1 C). The onset of ordered-phase formation occurred at or above 15 mol % for DOPC and DLPC, and at even lower concentrations of DPPC in DAPC and DDPC. For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Table S4.
Taken together, the gel phases formed by DPPC appeared to be more ordered (at each concentration and unsaturated PC) when compared to the gel phases formed by PSM, because both the average and longest lifetimes were shorter for PSM gel phases compared to DPPC gel phases at comparable bilayer compositions.
Mixed bilayers containing mono- and polyunsaturated PCs and SSM
Next, we examined how SSM behaved in the unsaturated PC bilayers. Its N-linked acyl chain has two extra methylene units compared to PSM, and its gel-liquid crystalline phase transition temperature is 4–5°C higher than the Tm for PSM (41, 42). The addition of increasing amounts of SSM to mixed chain PC bilayers led to a sigmoidal increase in the average lifetime of tPA (Fig. 1 E). The POPC bilayers displayed the shortest tPA lifetime, whereas PDPC exhibited the longest. The onset of gel phase formation occurred at above 10 mol % for POPC and PLPC bilayers and at an even lower concentration of SSM in PAPC and PDPC bilayers (Fig. S3). The highest average lifetime reached only 45 ns at 45 mol % SSM (whereas pure SSM had an average tPA lifetime of 53 ns), and even the longest lifetime component did not reach the value of pure SSM. In equal chain PC bilayers, SSM behaved much like PSM, although it formed gel phases at lower concentrations than PSM (Fig. 1 F). The onset of gel phase formation occurred at very low SSM concentrations (>0 to 10 mol %; Fig. S3). For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Tables S5 and S6.
The results with SSM show that extending the N-linked acyl chain of SM with two carbons (SSM versus PSM) had a substantial effect on the gel phase formation in each unsaturated PC bilayer.
Mixed bilayers containing mono- and polyunsaturated PCs and PSPC
PSPC has been used as a match for SSM in a recent study (43), and we have included it in this study, although the sn-1 palmitoyl residue together with the glycerol moiety probably is not equal in length to the sphingoid base of SSM. Compared to DPPC, PSPC has two additional methylene units in the sn-2 acyl chain, and its Tm is 9°C higher than the Tm for DPPC (49 vs. 41°C, respectively). Compared to the addition of DPPC to mixed chain PC bilayers, the addition of PSPC caused the average lifetime of tPA to rise at lower PSPC concentrations and to higher absolute values (Fig. 1 G). The onset of gel phase formation occurred between >0 and 10 mol % in each mixed chain PC bilayer (Fig. S4). For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Table S7.
The miscibility of PSPC in equal chain PC bilayers was nonideal, as evidenced by the rapid onset of the gel phase formation as well as the high degree of order in the gel phase (long average lifetime (Fig. 1 H) and the longest lifetime component of tPA (Fig. S4). For all lifetime components and their fractional intensities and amplitudes, please see Table S8.
When tPA average lifetimes are plotted such that all saturated phospholipids are in the same panel for each unsaturated PC species, one can easily compare the lateral segregation of the gel phase as a function of the nature of the saturated phospholipid (Fig. 2). For the mixed chain PCs, the SMs formed less ordered gel phases compared to the matched saturated PCs, at equal concentration. The observed changes in average lifetime of tPA versus concentration of saturated phospholipid also followed clear trends, except in a few cases. For PDPC bilayers, the DPPC appeared to deviate somewhat from the trend (being closer to the PSM line). Deviation from the trend was also seen to some extent for DPPC in DPLC and DAPC bilayers, and for SSM in DDPC bilayers (Fig. 2). The reason for these deviations is not clear.
DSC analysis of mixed bilayers containing either PSM or DPPC and mono- and polyunsaturated PCs
To further analyze the formation and cooperativity of the gel phases formed by the saturated PSM and DPPC in the unsaturated PC bilayers, we obtained thermograms by DSC analysis (Figs. 3 and 4). The samples we measured contained 45 mol % saturated phospholipid. As shown in Fig. 3, PSM formed gel phases for which the melting occurred over a broad temperature range. The temperature range, in which the gel phase melted, shifted to higher temperatures as the degree of unsaturation increased. This was more clearly seen for equal chain PC bilayers. Only for PDPC and DDPC bilayers did the temperature range overlap with the Tm of pure PSM. The measured enthalpies of the melting of the gel phase in mixed chain PC bilayers were 25–30% of that for pure PSM, and ∼40–60% in equal chain bilayers (Table S10).
The melting of gel phases formed by DPPC was more cooperative compared to PSM systems (narrower peak width at half height; Fig. 4). The melting temperatures shifted very little in the mixed chain PCs (except for PDPC) but drifted to higher temperatures more clearly in equal chain PC bilayers. The gel phase formed by DPPC in DAPC and DDPC bilayers appeared to be more complex than for the other compositions. The melting enthalpies in mixed bilayers were 22–50% that of pure DPPC in both mixed chain and equal chain PC bilayers (Table S10).
Discussion
Of the saturated phospholipids we have investigated, both PSM and SSM are biologically very relevant lipids. PSM is the major species in human fibroblasts, and SSM is a dominant molecular species in cultured neurons (44). Although DPPC is found in lung surfactant fractions (45), it is present only in very small amounts in eukaryotic cell membranes. One exception appears to be the bovine rod outer segment membrane, which could contain as much as 20% DPPC, together with polyunsaturated PCs (46). PSPC is a highly ordered lipid that does not have a significant presence in most cell membranes. However, these lipids were chosen not only on the basis of biological significance, but also because they have been extensively studied in model membrane systems. Of the polyunsaturated phospholipids, phosphatidylethanolamines are believed to be more prevalent in cell membranes compared to PC species (47), but both are present. In addition, some phosphatidylserines have also been reported to contain polyunsaturated acyl chains (47). In specialized cells, such as sperm cells, even SM may contain very long polyunsaturated acyl chains (48).
Phospholipids with mismatched acyl chain length (49) or unsaturation (50) are known to interact poorly and favor lateral segregation when possible. Previous studies have demonstrated that SM and cholesterol phase-separate from 22:6-containing phospholipids (e.g., phosphatidylethanolamine (51)). One reason for the segregation is believed to be cholesterol’s aversion for the highly unsaturated acyl chains of the cophospholipids (29), which would in part drive the formation of cholesterol/SM domains. However, few studies have conducted a direct comparison of the effect of acyl chain unsaturation on the phase separation of saturated phospholipids in the absence of cholesterol. One such is by Curatolo and coworkers (52), who showed that PCs with a delta Tm of 33°C or higher (Tm difference between low and high melting PCs in a binary bilayer) show gel phase immiscibility. In this study, we have systematically examined how saturated PSM, DPPC, SSM, and PSPC behave in increasingly unsaturated PC bilayers. We have used both lifetime analysis of tPA and calorimetry. Time-resolved tPA fluorescence is a useful method for demonstrating the presence of ordered domains (or phases) in a fluid bilayer (see Introduction).
The result trends we present in Fig. 1 are not unexpected, in the sense that an ordered (gel) phase should be formed as a saturated phospholipid is increasingly added to an unsaturated PC bilayer. Partial phase diagrams for PSM, DPPC, SSM, and PSPC in POPC and/or DOPC have been published (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 52), giving the concentration of saturated lipid needed for gel phase formation. In other studies, it has been shown that both 16:0/18:1 and16:0/22:6 phosphatidylethanolamine phase-separate from SM, and that 16:0/22:6 phosphatidylethanolamine display greater nonideal mixing with SM (34). This concentration-dependent phase separation (Fig. 1) resulted most likely both from unfavorable interactions between saturated and unsaturated acyl chains, from acyl chain length mismatch, and from possible cohesive interactions between hydrogen bonding phospholipids (SM). Phase separation can also be induced by headgroup effects, and this may also play some role in the current setup, because the rotational freedom of the headgroups may differ in PCs and SMs (53, 54). Interestingly, both SMs appeared to form a less ordered gel phase with unsaturated PCs compared to their saturated PC matches, as seen from the shorter tPA lifetimes at equal concentration. It is unlikely that this fairly large difference depends on the fact that DPPC is not the best match for PSM (nor is PSPC for SSM), because the sn-1 chain length + glycerol is longer than the long-chain base of SM. The length difference between PSM and DPPC is fairly small compared to the large ordered phase forming effect we observed. It is more likely that the hydrogen-bonding properties of PSM and SSM allow them to better interact with unsaturated PC, compared to both DPPC and PSPC. It has also been suggested that SM interaction in monolayers does not lead to long-range crystalline in plane order, as compared to other nonsphingolipid phospholipids (55). If such lateral packing is replicated also in bilayer membranes, it could affect the miscibility with colipids in a way seen in our study. The SMs are hydrogen bond donors (from 2NH and 3OH in the long-chain base), whereas the glycerophospholipids only are acceptors for hydrogen bonds. A different degree of water penetration into the interfacial region may also explain differences between SMs and PCs with regard to miscibility in unsaturated and laterally expanded PC bilayers (56).
The observation that a saturated acyl chain (16:0) in the sn-1 position of the unsaturated PCs had a large effect on gel phase formation is of interest. The gel phases formed in diunsaturated PC bilayers were as a rule more ordered than the corresponding phases formed in 1-16:0/2-unsaturated-PC bilayers. Phospholipids with mixed saturated/unsaturated acyl chains are known to act as hybrid lipids in laterally phase-segregated bilayers (57). They may interact with both the ordered phase (via the saturated acyl chain) and the disordered phase (via the unsaturated acyl chain) and thus influence domain boundary properties. The other interesting feature of our results was the observed large effect on gel phase formation by increasing the length of the saturated phospholipid by 2 methylene units (SSM versus PSM and PSPC versus DPPC). The increased chain length of SSM and PSPC provides for additional van der Waals interactions compared to the shorter saturated phospholipids, but also introduce intramolecular acyl chain mismatch, which most likely counteracts the attractive hydrophobic interactions. The more ordered gel phases formed by both SSM and PSPC suggest that the attractive interactions are more important than acyl chain disorder caused by their mismatch.
Based on tPA lifetime data (the longest lifetime component) it appeared that none of the saturated phospholipids formed a gel phase in unsaturated PC bilayers that had properties similar to a pure saturated phospholipid phase. This conclusion is also supported by DSC analysis (Fig. 3). The gel phase meltings were broad and noncooperative, suggesting multiple components and complex melting behavior. PSM at 45 mol % in both PDPC and DDPC appeared to have an ordered phase component, which melted above 40°C, suggestive of a gel phase component very similar to pure PSM gel phase. A similar discrepancy can also be seen for DPPC in PDPC, in which the longest lifetime component of tPA did not reach the level measured in pure DPPC, but the DSC thermogram reported a gel phase melting reaching above 41°C (Fig. 4). Apparently, the partly conflicting information provided by tPA (Figs. S1–S4) and DSC (Figs. 3 and 4) may suggest that the long lifetime of tPA did not report pure gel phase lifetimes because the long-lived excited state permitted tPA to also report from less ordered gel phases present during its excited lifetime (because of diffusion between ordered and less ordered environments). It is also possible that the gel phase formed actually contained traces of the unsaturated PC, thus giving broad multicomponent melting transitions and tPA lifetimes below that observed in pure saturated phospholipid.
The onset of gel phase formation was probably not abrupt but gradual, occurring as the concentration of the saturated phospholipid increased and containing a spectrum of different ratios of saturated to unsaturated phospholipids. This is suggested by the noncooperative melting of the ordered phase formed by both PSM and DPPC in unsaturated PC bilayers (Figs. 3 and 4). The reduced cooperativity of melting of PSM gel phases compared to DPPC gel phases also suggests that PSM displayed better miscibility with unsaturated PCs than DPPC. The phase separation of PSM or DPPC from the most unsaturated DDPC was never complete, as demonstrated by both the noncooperative gel-phase melting (Figs. 3 and 4) and the loss of melting enthalpy (Table S10) as compared to pure PSM or DPPC melting.
Taken together, our results show that all four saturated phospholipids displayed partial miscibility with all unsaturated PCs used in the study, even though miscibility became increasingly nonideal as the degree of unsaturation increased.
Biological significance
In cell membranes, SMs are mostly localized in the exoleaflet (58, 59), whereas polyunsaturated phospholipids are predominantly found in the endoleaflet (27). However, this segregation is probably not absolute, and SMs may encounter polyunsaturated phospholipids during various events in cell membrane remodeling. In such instances, the mismatch in acyl chain unsaturation between SM and other colipids will lead to lateral segregation, which is further enforced by cholesterol’s aversion for polyunsaturated acyl chains (31) and its affinity for SM domains (60). The role of this process in transient lipid raft formation is, however, unclear. It is also of interest to note that the saturated SMs used in this study, which are also the most prevalent SM species in cell membranes, were more miscible in unsaturated PC bilayers compared to their saturated PC counterparts. The fact that both DPPC and PSPC could form harmful gel phases in highly unsaturated PC bilayers may be one reason they are missing from the cell membrane lipidome. Finally, our results clearly show that all unsaturated PCs are not alike. A consequence of this is that simple model systems with one low melting and one high melting phospholipid is never a good model for complex biological membranes where a multitude of molecular species are present and interacting with each other in complex ways.
Author Contributions
J.P.S. designed research. A.K. and O.E. performed research. A.K., E.O., and J.P.S. analyzed data and wrote the article.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Terhi Maula for constructive comments on the manuscript.
Financial support was generously provided by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Academy of Finland, the Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation, and the Åbo Akademi Foundation.
Editor: Heiko Heerklotz.
Footnotes
Four figures, three schemes, and ten tables are available at http://www.biophysj.org/biophysj/supplemental/S0006-3495(15)00943-1.
Supporting Material
References
- 1.Feigenson G.W. Phase behavior of lipid mixtures. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;2:560–563. doi: 10.1038/nchembio1106-560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Simons K., Vaz W.L. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2004;33:269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lingwood D., Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science. 2010;327:46–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1174621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown D.A., London E. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:17221–17224. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R000005200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Simons K., Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387:569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Simons K., Ikonen E. How cells handle cholesterol. Science. 2000;290:1721–1726. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Simons K., Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;1:31–39. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pike L.J. Rafts defined: a report on the Keystone Symposium on Lipid Rafts and Cell Function. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:1597–1598. doi: 10.1194/jlr.E600002-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.London E., Brown D.A., Xu X. Fluorescence quenching assay of sphingolipid/phospholipid phase separation in model membranes. Methods Enzymol. 2000;312:272–290. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)12915-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.London E. Insights into lipid raft structure and formation from experiments in model membranes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002;12:480–486. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00351-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu X., London E. The effect of sterol structure on membrane lipid domains reveals how cholesterol can induce lipid domain formation. Biochemistry. 2000;39:843–849. doi: 10.1021/bi992543v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Björkbom A., Róg T., Slotte J.P. N- and O-methylation of sphingomyelin markedly affects its membrane properties and interactions with cholesterol. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1808:1179–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Björkqvist Y.J.E., Nyholm T.K.M., Ramstedt B. Domain formation and stability in complex lipid bilayers as reported by cholestatrienol. Biophys. J. 2005;88:4054–4063. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.054718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Halling K.K., Ramstedt B., Nyholm T.K. Cholesterol interactions with fluid-phase phospholipids: effect on the lateral organization of the bilayer. Biophys. J. 2008;95:3861–3871. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.108.133744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Almeida R.F., Fedorov A., Prieto M. Sphingomyelin/phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol phase diagram: boundaries and composition of lipid rafts. Biophys. J. 2003;85:2406–2416. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74664-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ionova I.V., Livshits V.A., Marsh D. Phase diagram of ternary cholesterol/palmitoylsphingomyelin/palmitoyloleoyl-phosphatidylcholine mixtures: spin-label EPR study of lipid-raft formation. Biophys. J. 2012;102:1856–1865. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marsh D. Cholesterol-induced fluid membrane domains: a compendium of lipid-raft ternary phase diagrams. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1788:2114–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Veatch S.L., Keller S.L. Miscibility phase diagrams of giant vesicles containing sphingomyelin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;94:148101–148104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.148101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Feigenson G.W., Buboltz J.T. Ternary phase diagram of dipalmitoyl-PC/dilauroyl-PC/cholesterol: nanoscopic domain formation driven by cholesterol. Biophys. J. 2001;80:2775–2788. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76245-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Björkbom A., Róg T., Slotte J.P. Effect of sphingomyelin headgroup size on molecular properties and interactions with cholesterol. Biophys. J. 2010;99:3300–3308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Björkbom A., Ramstedt B., Slotte J.P. Phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin containing an elaidoyl fatty acid can form cholesterol-rich lateral domains in bilayer membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1768:1839–1847. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jaikishan S., Slotte J.P. Effect of hydrophobic mismatch and interdigitation on sterol/sphingomyelin interaction in ternary bilayer membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1808:1940–1945. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jaikishan S., Björkbom A., Slotte J.P. Sphingomyelin analogs with branched N-acyl chains: the position of branching dramatically affects acyl chain order and sterol interactions in bilayer membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1798:1987–1994. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nyholm T.K., Lindroos D., Slotte J.P. Construction of a DOPC/PSM/cholesterol phase diagram based on the fluorescence properties of trans-parinaric acid. Langmuir. 2011;27:8339–8350. doi: 10.1021/la201427w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sergelius C., Slotte J.P. Membrane properties of and cholesterol’s interactions with a biologically relevant three-chain sphingomyelin: 3O-palmitoyl-N-palmitoyl-D-erythro-sphingomyelin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1808:2841–2848. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Slotte J.P. Molecular properties of various structurally defined sphingomyelins – correlation of structure with function. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013;52:206–219. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wassall S.R., Stillwell W. Polyunsaturated fatty acid-cholesterol interactions: domain formation in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1788:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shaikh S.R., Kinnun J.J., Wassall S.R. How polyunsaturated fatty acids modify molecular organization in membranes: insight from NMR studies of model systems. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1848(1 Pt B):211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shaikh S.R., Cherezov V., Wassall S.R. Molecular organization of cholesterol in unsaturated phosphatidylethanolamines: x-ray diffraction and solid state 2H NMR reveal differences with phosphatidylcholines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:5375–5383. doi: 10.1021/ja057949b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Niu S.L., Litman B.J. Determination of membrane cholesterol partition coefficient using a lipid vesicle-cyclodextrin binary system: effect of phospholipid acyl chain unsaturation and headgroup composition. Biophys. J. 2002;83:3408–3415. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75340-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kucerka N., Marquardt D., Katsaras J. Cholesterol in bilayers with PUFA chains: doping with DMPC or POPC results in sterol reorientation and membrane-domain formation. Biochemistry. 2010;49:7485–7493. doi: 10.1021/bi100891z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Williams J.A., Batten S.E., Wassall S.R. Docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids segregate differently between raft and nonraft domains. Biophys. J. 2012;103:228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shaikh S.R., Brzustowicz M.R., Wassall S.R. Monounsaturated PE does not phase-separate from the lipid raft molecules sphingomyelin and cholesterol: role for polyunsaturation? Biochemistry. 2002;41:10593–10602. doi: 10.1021/bi025712b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shaikh S.R., Locascio D.S., Stillwell W. Oleic- and docosahexaenoic acid-containing phosphatidylethanolamines differentially phase separate from sphingomyelin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1788:2421–2426. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bakht O., Pathak P., London E. Effect of the structure of lipids favoring disordered domain formation on the stability of cholesterol-containing ordered domains (lipid rafts): identification of multiple raft-stabilization mechanisms. Biophys. J. 2007;93:4307–4318. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sklar L.A., Miljanich G.P., Dratz E.A. Phospholipid lateral phase separation and the partition of cis-parinaric acid and trans-parinaric acid among aqueous, solid lipid, and fluid lipid phases. Biochemistry. 1979;18:1707–1716. doi: 10.1021/bi00576a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Welti R., Silbert D.F. Partition of parinaroyl phospholipid probes between solid and fluid phosphatidylcholine phases. Biochemistry. 1982;21:5685–5689. doi: 10.1021/bi00265a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kuklev D.V., Smith W.L. Synthesis of four isomers of parinaric acid. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2004;131:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lakowicz J.R. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; New York: 1999. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Térová B., Slotte J.P., Nyholm T.K. Miscibility of acyl-chain defined phosphatidylcholines with N-palmitoyl sphingomyelin in bilayer membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1667:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maulik P.R., Shipley G.G. N-palmitoyl sphingomyelin bilayers: structure and interactions with cholesterol and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. Biochemistry. 1996;35:8025–8034. doi: 10.1021/bi9528356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maulik P.R., Sripada P.K., Shipley G.G. Structure and thermotropic properties of hydrated N-stearoyl sphingomyelin bilayer membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1991;1062:211–219. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90395-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yasuda T., Kinoshita M., Matsumori N. Detailed comparison of deuterium quadrupole profiles between sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine bilayers. Biophys. J. 2014;106:631–638. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Valsecchi M., Mauri L., Sonnino S. Ceramide and sphingomyelin species of fibroblasts and neurons in culture. J. Lipid Res. 2007;48:417–424. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600344-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Guthmann F., Haupt R., Rüstow B. Alveolar surfactant subfractions differ in their lipid composition. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1995;27:1021–1026. doi: 10.1016/1357-2725(95)00078-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miljanich G.P., Sklar L.A., Dratz E.A. Disaturated and dipolyunsaturated phospholipids in the bovine retinal rod outer segment disk membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1979;552:294–306. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90284-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Emmelot P., Van Hoeven R.P. Phospholipid unsaturation and plasma membrane organization. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1975;14:236–246. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(75)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sandhoff R. Very long chain sphingolipids: tissue expression, function and synthesis. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:1907–1913. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ipsen J.H., Mouritsen O.G. Modelling the phase equilibria in two-component membranes of phospholipids with different acyl-chain lengths. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1988;944:121–134. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90425-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wassall S.R., Stillwell W. Docosahexaenoic acid domains: the ultimate non-raft membrane domain. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 2008;153:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2008.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shaikh S.R., Cherezov V., Wassall S.R. Interaction of cholesterol with a docosahexaenoic acid-containing phosphatidylethanolamine: trigger for microdomain/raft formation? Biochemistry. 2003;42:12028–12037. doi: 10.1021/bi034931+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Curatolo W., Sears B., Neuringer L.J. A calorimetry and deuterium NMR study of mixed model membranes of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleylphosphatidylcholine and saturated phosphatidylcholines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1985;817:261–270. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Niemelä P., Hyvönen M.T., Vattulainen I. Structure and dynamics of sphingomyelin bilayer: insight gained through systematic comparison to phosphatidylcholine. Biophys. J. 2004;87:2976–2989. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.048702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Malcolm I.C., Ross J.C., Higinbotham J. A study of the headgroup motion of sphingomyelin using 31P NMR and an analytically soluble model. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2005;27:247–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vaknin D., Kelley M.S., Ocko B.M. Sphingomyelin at the air-water interface. J. Chem. Phys. 2001;115:7697–7704. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nyholm T., Nylund M., Slotte J.P. Properties of palmitoyl phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin, and dihydrosphingomyelin bilayer membranes as reported by different fluorescent reporter molecules. Biophys. J. 2003;84:987–997. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74915-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heberle F.A., Doktorova M., Feigenson G.W. Hybrid and nonhybrid lipids exert common effects on membrane raft size and morphology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:14932–14935. doi: 10.1021/ja407624c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barenholz Y., Thompson T.E. Sphingomyelins in bilayers and biological membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1980;604:129–158. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90572-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ohvo-Rekilä H., Ramstedt B., Slotte J.P. Cholesterol interactions with phospholipids in membranes. Prog. Lipid Res. 2002;41:66–97. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(01)00020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lönnfors M., Doux J.P., Slotte J.P. Sterols have higher affinity for sphingomyelin than for phosphatidylcholine bilayers even at equal acyl-chain order. Biophys. J. 2011;100:2633–2641. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.