Abstract
We have developed a high-resolution, compact semiconductor camera for nuclear medicine applications. The modular unit has been used to obtain tomographic images of phantoms and mice. The system consists of a 64 x 64 CdZnTe detector array and a parallel-hole tungsten collimator mounted inside a 17 cm x 5.3 cm x 3.7 cm tungsten-aluminum housing. The detector is a 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 0.15 cm slab of CdZnTe connected to a 64 x 64 multiplexer readout via indium-bump bonding. The collimator is 7 mm thick, with a 0.38 mm pitch that matches the detector pixel pitch. We obtained a series of projections by rotating the object in front of the camera. The axis of rotation was vertical and about 1.5 cm away from the collimator face. Mouse holders were made out of acrylic plastic tubing to facilitate rotation and the administration of gas anesthetic. Acquisition times were varied from 60 sec to 90 sec per image for a total of 60 projections at an equal spacing of 6 degrees between projections. We present tomographic images of a line phantom and mouse bone scan and assess the properties of the system. The reconstructed images demonstrate spatial resolution on the order of 1–2 mm.
I. Introduction
Imaging semiconductor detectors based on materials such as CdZnTe can possess excellent energy and spatial resolution and operate at non-cryogenic temperatures. Such detectors can be used in biomedicine for high-resolution gamma-ray imaging of both humans and animals. Radiotracer imaging techniques in small animals can be useful in providing information on the progress of a disease and its treatment by allowing the animal to act as its own control. Several tomographic gamma-ray imaging systems using scintillators have recently been developed [1–4]. Semiconductor gamma-ray imaging systems have also been constructed, but most of them have been used primarily for planar imaging [5–6]. We have built a compact, high-resolution semiconductor imaging system using a high-resolution CdZnTe detector array and a parallel-hole collimator, and in collaboration with the University of California San Francisco we have developed a procedure for acquiring tomographic images of small animals.
II. Imaging Methods
A. System Description
We have developed CdZnTe arrays for high-resolution imaging; details on design and construction of these pixel arrays have been reported elsewhere [7–9]. Briefly, these arrays consist of a 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 0.15 cm slab of CdZnTe with a continuous gold electrode on the top and a 64 x 64 array of gold electrodes on the bottom. The continuous electrode is held at a constant bias of −140 V. The pixel size is 330 μm with interpixel separation of 50 μm, resulting in a 380 μm pitch. Each pixel of the detector array is connected to a readout integrated circuit by an indium-bump bond. We designed a high-resolution parallel-hole collimator to match the pitch of the detector array. The collimator, fabricated by Tecomet, is a laminar composite of tungsten foils that have been etched in a square pattern using a photolithographic process. A similar manufacturing process has been used by other researchers in making high-resolution animal imaging systems [10–11]. The performance of the collimator-detector combination as a planar imaging system has been investigated and reported elsewhere [5]. The prototype system is housed in a 25.4 cm x 15.6 cm x 5.2 cm aluminum box with lead shielding surrounding the box. In this paper we report on the tomographic performance of the prototype system as well as an improved version of its housing.
We designed a 17 cm x 5.3 cm x 3.7 cm tungsten-aluminum housing to hold the CdZnTe detector array and tungsten collimator. This module forms a compact and portable imaging unit, and it is a large improvement over the bulky prototype system. The housing includes a thermoelectric cooler and signal-processing electronics. Details of the design and construction of this system have been presented elsewhere [12]. Imaging initially with the prototype, and ultimately the portable module, we obtained projections of a line phantom and mice by rotating them in front of the camera. We chose the axis of rotation to be vertical to eliminate gravitational movement of internal organs during imaging.
Mouse holders were made out of one-inch diameter acrylic tubing to facilitate imaging. A photo of our mouse holder is presented as figure 1. Similar holders have been developed by our collaborators at UCSF to facilitate ECG-gated myocardial imaging of small animals [13]. The mouse holders were fabricated to resemble commercially available cylindrical rodent restrainers. The mouse was gently pulled into the restrainer by its tail along the open groove until the animal was completely enclosed in the cylinder. A white Delrin nose piece placed up to the nose of the animal further confined any movement. An isoflurane/oxygen mixture was circulated via respiratory tubing inside the holder to provide anesthesia. An intravenous injection to the exposed tail-vein was performed after the animal was completely sedated. The holder was then attached to a precision rotational stage and placed with its center of rotation about 1.5 cm away from the face of the collimator. This was the closest distance from the center of rotation allowing the rotation stage to freely move over 360 degrees.
The system setup including the animal holder and the portable imager, mounted on a translation stage, is shown in figure 2. A total of 60 projection images were collected for each object in 6-degree intervals. We restricted the acquisition time to 60–90 sec per view. Each of the projections was corrected for activity decay. The field of view was limited by the size of the detector array to 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm. The overall collection efficiency of the detector-collimator system was about 10−5. All of the tomographic images were generated using an ML-EM iterative reconstruction algorithm, which corrects for the effects of collimator blur but not attenuation and scatter. Flood correction and median filtering were also applied to each of the projections to correct for inhomogeneities of the detector.
B. Line Phantom Imaging
A line phantom was made out of an acrylic rod to evaluate the resolution properties of our system. A diagram of this phantom is shown in figure 3. It consists of fifteen 2 mm diameter holes arranged in an equilateral triangular form. The center-to-center distance between holes was 4 mm. The line phantom was filled with 5 mCi of 99mTc aqueous solution and imaged for 1 minute over 60 views separated by 6 degrees.
C. Animal Imaging
A 25 g mouse was injected with 18 mCi of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate in the tail vein. A bone scan image of the skull and the thorax was acquired about three hours after injection. A 0.5%–3% isoflurane/oxygen mixture was continuously administered into the holder keeping the animal completely sedated. The animal was monitored for depth of anesthesia. We obtained 60 projections with an acquisition time of 60 and 90 seconds per projection for the skull and thorax images respectively.
III. Results
A. Line Phantom
We assessed the resolution properties of the system by imaging the line phantom shown in figure 3. The image in figure 4 represents consecutive slices of the reconstructed 60 projections of the line phantom. The 60 views were obtained with the portable unit. The spacing between slices is 0.4 mm. Individual lines are clearly resolved in the reconstructed image in figure 3. A small circular artifact in the center of each slice is due to a slight wobble of the rotation stage. The representative line profile in figure 5 indicates a resolution better than 2 mm.
B. Mouse Bone Scan
Tomographic images of a bone scan of the mouse thorax are shown in figure 6. Since our portable unit was not complete at this time these images were acquired with the prototype system. The set of images represents transverse slices of the thorax area with a 0.4 mm separation between slices. The mouse is oriented with its head to the right of the image. The front limbs and the outline of the thorax are clearly visible. Individual ribs can also be resolved.
Tomographic images of a bone scan of the mouse skull are shown in figures 7 and 8. Figure 7 illustrates consecutive coronal slices of the skull while figure 8 shows consecutive transverse slices. The spacing between slices is 0.4 mm for both sequences. The images demonstrate anatomical features of the skull such as the zygomatic bones, the mandible, and the nasal turbinates with an estimated spatial resolution of 1–2 mm.
IV. Discussion
We believe that our portable unit along with the rotation procedure can be very useful in a laboratory environment in acquiring tomographic images of small animals, primarily mice. The resolution of our system degrades linearly with the distance away from the collimator face. Figure 8 illustrates the dependence of the calculated spatial resolution on the collimator-source distance. For larger objects one has to sacrifice resolution since larger holders and consequently greater detector-object distances are required. Furthermore, since the field of view of our system is limited to the size of the semiconductor array, larger objects can cause reconstruction artifacts when rotated in front of a small field-of-view camera.
The low sensitivity and consequently long acquisition times may appear to limit the use of this instrument in a commercial environment where high throughput of animals is usually required. However, in this case multiple modules can be used to reduce the necessary projections and acquisition time. Four modules placed in a square pattern can be a feasible arrangement keeping the collimator-object distance minimal. However, in order to fit more than four cameras a larger distance is required and consequently a sacrifice in resolution. Furthermore, one is also limited by the time it takes to sedate the animal as well as the recovery time. lsoflurane allows for both a rapid induction and recovery.
V. Conclusion
We have demonstrated that high-resolution tomographic images of mice can be acquired using a collimated CdZnTe imaging array. By rotating the object in front of the camera, we obtained images of a line phantom and a mouse bone scan with 1–2 mm spatial resolution. The field of view was limited to 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm due to the size of the semiconductor array. We are presently constructing tomographic imaging systems with multiple imaging modules that will provide a larger field of view and shorter acquisition times.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank G. McNeill and the technical staff of the Division of Nuclear Medicine of University Medical Center at the University of Arizona for support with the radiotracers. We would like to further thank B. Skovan for her assistance. The work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant RO1 CA75288 and P41 RR14304. George Kastis is a scholar of the “Alexander S. Onassis” Public Benefit Foundation under Group-T040.
VII. References
- 1.Cherry SR, Shao Y, Silverman RW, Meadors K, Siegel S, Chatziioannou A, Young JW, Jones W, Moyers JC, Newport D, Boutefnouchet A, Farquhar TH, Andreaco M, Paulus MJ, Binkley DM, Nutt R, Phelps ME. MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1997;44(3):1161–1166. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kastis GK, Barber HB, Barrett HH, Gifford HC, Pang IW, Patton DD, Sain JD, Stevenson G, Wilson DW. High resolution SPECT imager for three-dimensional imaging of small animals. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(5) suppl:9P. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jeavons AP, Chandler RA, Dettmar CAR. A 3D HIDAC-PET camera with sub-millimetre resolution for imaging small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46(3):468–473. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schramm N, Wirrwar A, Sonnenberg F, Halling H. Compact high resolution detector for small animal SPECT. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;47(3):1163–1167. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kastis GA, Barber HB, Barrett HH, Balzer SJ, Lu D, Marks DG, Stevenson G, Woolfenden JM, Appleby M, Tueller J. Gamma-ray imaging using a CdZnTe pixel array and a high-resolution, parallel-hole collimator submitted to. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci [Google Scholar]
- 6.Scheiber C, Eclancher B, Chambron J, Prat V, Kazandjan A, Jahnke A, Matz R, Thomas S, Warren S, Hage-Hali M, Regal R, Siffert P, Karman M. Heart imaging by cadmium telluride gamma camera European Program “BIOMED” consortium. Nucl Instr and Meth in Phys Res A. 1999;428(1):138–149. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matherson KJ, Barber HB, Barrett HH, Eskin JD, Dereniak EL, Marks DG, Woolfenden JM, Young ET, Augustine FL. Progress in the development of large-area modular 64x64 CdZnTe imaging arrays for nuclear medicine. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1998;45(3):354–358. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Barber HB, Barrett HH, Augustine FL, Hamilton WJ, Apotovsky BA, Dereniak EL, Doty FP, Eskin JD, Garcia JP, Marks DG, Matherson KJ, Woolfenden JM, Young ET. Development of a 64x64 CdZnTe array and associated readout integrated circuit for use in nuclear medicine. Journal of Electronic Materials. 1997;26(6):765–772. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Woolfenden JM, Barber HB, Barrett HH, Dereniak EL, Eskin JD, Marks DG, Matherson KJ, Young ET, Augustine FL. Modular 64x64 CdZnTe arrays with multiplexer readout for high-resolution nuclear medicine imaging. Semiconductors for Room-Temperature Radiation Detector Applications II. In: James RB, et al., editors. Mat Res Soc Symp Proc. Vol. 487. 1998. pp. 239–243. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Menard L, Charon Y, Solal M, Lanièce P, Mastrippolito R, Pinot L, Ploux L, Ricard M, Valentin L. POCI:A compact high resolution gamma camera for intraoperative surgical use. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1998;45(3):1293–1297. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Menard L, Charon Y, Solal M, Ricard M, Lanièce P, Mastrippolito R, Pinot L, Valentin L. Performance characterization and first clinical evaluation of a intraoperative compact gamma camera. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46(6):2068–2074. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Balzer SJ, Barber HB, Barrett HH, Furenlid LR, Kastis GA. A portable gamma-ray imager for small animal studies. presented at the SPIE #4142 Conf; San Diego, CA. August 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu MC, Tang HR, Gao DW, Ido A, O’Connell JW, Hasegawa BH, Dae MW. ECG-Gated pinhole SPECT in mice. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;45(3):354–358. [Google Scholar]