Crystal structure of di-μ-iodido-bis­[bis(aceto­nitrile-κN)copper(I)]

Abstract

The title compound, [Cu₂I₂(CH₃CN)₄], exhibits a centrosymmetric Cu₂I₂ core [Cu⋯Cu distance = 2.7482 (11) Å], the Cu^I atoms of which are further coordinated by four mol­ecules of aceto­nitrile. The Cu^I atom has an overall distorted tetra­hedral coordination environment evidenced by L—Cu—L angles (L = N or I) ranging from 100.47 (10) to 117.06 (2)°. The coordination geometries of the aceto­nitrile ligands deviate slightly from linearity as shown by Cu—N—C angles of 167.0 (2) and 172.7 (2)°. In the crystal, there are no significant hydrogen-bonding inter­actions present, so the crystal packing seems to be formed predominantly by van der Waals forces.

Related literature  

The title mol­ecule is the active species used for the synthesis of luminescent compounds with (CuI)_n moieties, prepared by treatment with sulfur ligands. For more details of syntheses and properties of these compounds, see: Knorr et al. (2012 ▸, 2014 ▸, 2015 ▸). The N—Cu—N angle of 100.47 (10)° in the title compound is comparable with that found in the pyridine-coordinated CuI dimer (Dyason et al., 1984 ▸). For crystal structures of CuI dimers with additional di­amine ligands, see: Haitko (2007 ▸); Garbauskas et al. (1986 ▸). The title compound represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first crystallographic characterization of CuI with aceto­nitrile as the only co-ligand, probably caused by the sensitive nature of the crystals. In the solid state, CuI appears as a polymer (Wyckoff & Posnjak, 1922 ▸).

Experimental  

Crystal data  

• [Cu₂I₂(C₂H₃N)₄]

• M _r = 545.10

• Monoclinic

• a = 7.669 (3) Å

• b = 14.367 (5) Å

• c = 7.944 (3) Å

• β = 116.957 (5)°

• V = 780.2 (5) ų

• Z = 2

• Mo Kα radiation

• μ = 6.66 mm⁻¹

• T = 173 K

• 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm

Data collection  

• Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

• Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003 ▸) T _min = 0.178, T _max = 1

• 18211 measured reflections

• 1696 independent reflections

• 1628 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

• R _int = 0.052

Refinement  

• R[F ² > 2σ(F ²)] = 0.021

• wR(F ²) = 0.056

• S = 1.16

• 1696 reflections

• 76 parameters

• H-atom parameters constrained

• Δρ_max = 0.77 e Å⁻³

• Δρ_min = −0.70 e Å⁻³

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 ▸); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003 ▸); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Supplementary Material

CCDC reference: 1427944

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

S1. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound occured as a byproduct from the synthesis of copper(I) iodide compounds (see: Related literature). CuI was dissolved in aceto­nitrile and treated with an excess of sulfur ligands (i.e. di­methyl sulfide). After stirring, the solution was stored in a refridgerator over night, followed by keeping it in a freezer (Knorr et al., 2015). In addition to the crystallized CuI compounds, the title compound could be isolated in traces.

S2. Refinement

Methyl hydrogen atoms were set geometrically and refined as a rotating group with U_iso(H) = 1.5U_eq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound with anisotropic displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Part of the crystal packing of the title compound viewed along [001]. H atoms were omitted for clarity.

Crystal data

[Cu2I2(C2H3N)4]	F(000) = 504
Mr = 545.10	Dx = 2.320 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.669 (3) Å	Cell parameters from 5543 reflections
b = 14.367 (5) Å	θ = 2.8–27.1°
c = 7.944 (3) Å	µ = 6.66 mm−1
β = 116.957 (5)°	T = 173 K
V = 780.2 (5) Å3	Block, colourless
Z = 2	0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer	1628 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	Rint = 0.052
phi and ω scans	θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003)	h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.178, Tmax = 1	k = −18→18
18211 measured reflections	l = −10→10
1696 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full	H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021	w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0281P)2 + 0.2851P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.056	(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.16	Δρmax = 0.77 e Å−3
1696 reflections	Δρmin = −0.70 e Å−3
76 parameters	Extinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraints	Extinction coefficient: 0.0356 (10)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. 1. Fixed Uiso At 1.5 times of: All C(H,H,H) groups 2.a Idealized Me refined as rotating group: C2(H2A,H2B,H2C), C4(H4A,H4B,H4C)

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Ų)

	x	y	z	Uiso*/Ueq
C1	0.2924 (4)	0.35511 (17)	0.2436 (4)	0.0327 (5)
C2	0.3602 (5)	0.3046 (2)	0.1258 (5)	0.0477 (7)
H2A	0.3147	0.2400	0.1117	0.072*
H2B	0.5035	0.3057	0.1851	0.072*
H2C	0.3081	0.3341	0.0012	0.072*
C3	0.5869 (4)	0.43439 (18)	0.8689 (4)	0.0327 (5)
C4	0.7870 (4)	0.4169 (2)	1.0081 (4)	0.0440 (6)
H4A	0.7881	0.3711	1.1000	0.066*
H4B	0.8464	0.4750	1.0734	0.066*
H4C	0.8617	0.3927	0.9451	0.066*
Cu	0.17322 (5)	0.46160 (2)	0.52217 (4)	0.03798 (12)
I	−0.09223 (2)	0.36402 (2)	0.57402 (3)	0.03945 (11)
N1	0.2374 (3)	0.39446 (16)	0.3335 (3)	0.0386 (5)
N2	0.4306 (3)	0.44856 (16)	0.7589 (3)	0.0402 (5)

Atomic displacement parameters (Ų)

	U11	U22	U33	U12	U13	U23
C1	0.0351 (13)	0.0281 (12)	0.0329 (13)	−0.0024 (9)	0.0137 (11)	0.0016 (9)
C2	0.0589 (18)	0.0430 (15)	0.0494 (17)	−0.0014 (13)	0.0318 (15)	−0.0063 (13)
C3	0.0348 (13)	0.0328 (12)	0.0294 (11)	−0.0015 (10)	0.0137 (10)	0.0003 (10)
C4	0.0323 (13)	0.0523 (17)	0.0381 (14)	0.0054 (12)	0.0077 (11)	0.0013 (12)
Cu	0.03422 (19)	0.0400 (2)	0.03415 (19)	0.00505 (13)	0.01066 (14)	−0.00146 (13)
I	0.03990 (14)	0.03205 (13)	0.04649 (15)	0.00095 (6)	0.01965 (10)	0.00337 (6)
N1	0.0407 (12)	0.0370 (12)	0.0369 (12)	0.0027 (10)	0.0164 (10)	−0.0009 (10)
N2	0.0345 (12)	0.0438 (13)	0.0353 (11)	0.0002 (10)	0.0096 (10)	0.0007 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2	1.454 (4)	C4—H4B	0.9800
C1—N1	1.132 (4)	C4—H4C	0.9800
C2—H2A	0.9800	Cu—Cui	2.7482 (11)
C2—H2B	0.9800	Cu—Ii	2.6108 (10)
C2—H2C	0.9800	Cu—I	2.6532 (8)
C3—C4	1.450 (3)	Cu—N1	2.022 (2)
C3—N2	1.137 (3)	Cu—N2	2.025 (2)
C4—H4A	0.9800	I—Cui	2.6108 (10)
N1—C1—C2	179.2 (3)	I—Cu—Cui	57.78 (3)
C1—C2—H2A	109.5	Ii—Cu—Cui	59.286 (14)
C1—C2—H2B	109.5	Ii—Cu—I	117.06 (2)
C1—C2—H2C	109.5	N1—Cu—Cui	129.99 (7)
H2A—C2—H2B	109.5	N1—Cu—I	108.95 (7)
H2A—C2—H2C	109.5	N1—Cu—Ii	110.27 (7)
H2B—C2—H2C	109.5	N1—Cu—N2	100.47 (10)
N2—C3—C4	179.4 (3)	N2—Cu—Cui	129.41 (8)
C3—C4—H4A	109.5	N2—Cu—I	107.48 (8)
C3—C4—H4B	109.5	N2—Cu—Ii	111.28 (7)
C3—C4—H4C	109.5	Cui—I—Cu	62.94 (2)
H4A—C4—H4B	109.5	C1—N1—Cu	172.7 (2)
H4A—C4—H4C	109.5	C3—N2—Cu	167.0 (2)
H4B—C4—H4C	109.5

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1.