Abstract
The interaction between bacteria and fibronectin is believed to play an important role in the pathogenicity of clinically important Gram-positive cocci. In the present study, we identified a gene encoding a predicted fibronectin-binding protein of Enterococcus faecium (fnm), a homologue of Streptococcus pneumoniae pavA, in the genomes of E. faecium strain TX82 and all other sequenced E. faecium isolates. Full-length recombinant Fnm from strain TX82 bound to immobilized fibronectin in a concentration-dependent manner and also appeared to bind collagen type V and laminin, but not other proteins, such as transferrin, heparin, bovine serum albumin, mucin, or collagen IV. We demonstrated that the N-terminal fragment of Fnm is required for full fibronectin binding, since truncation of this region caused a 2.4-fold decrease (P < 0.05) in the adhesion of E. faecium TX82 to fibronectin. Deletion of fnm resulted in a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the ability of the mutant, TX6128, to bind fibronectin relative to that of the wild-type strain; in situ reconstitution of fnm in the deletion mutant strain restored adherence. In addition, the Δfnm mutant was highly attenuated relative to TX82 (P ≤ 0.0001) in a mixed-inoculum rat endocarditis model. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Fnm affects the adherence of E. faecium to fibronectin and is important in the pathogenesis of experimental endocarditis.
INTRODUCTION
Bacterial adherence to host tissues and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins is a critical step in the process of infection, since it establishes the initial contact with the host. These interactions can facilitate translocation across the mucosal barrier and internalization into subcellular compartments, eventually leading to bacterial spread within eukaryotic cells (1). Particularly in Gram-positive pathogens, surface-exposed adherence molecules, such as MSCRAMMs (microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules), are key players in host-microbe interactions (2). Host ligands include ECM components, e.g., fibronectin, collagen, and laminin, as well as molecules that are also present in blood, including fibrinogen and vitronectin (2).
Generally reported as a well-adapted commensal of the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals, Enterococcus faecium has emerged over the past 3 decades as a leading cause of hospital-associated diseases, including urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia, intra-abdominal infections, and endocarditis (3–5). The rising incidence of multiantibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections caused by E. faecium has led to the inclusion of these organisms in the list of “no ESKAPE” (E. faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacteriaceae) pathogens that pose a challenge to clinicians and threaten patient safety (6). In the United States, approximately 80% of health care-associated E. faecium strains are vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and more than 90% are ampicillin resistant (5). The frequent lack of an antibiotic regimen of proven efficacy has sparked an interest in understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to E. faecium pathogenesis.
Fibronectin (Fn) is a large multidomain dimeric glycoprotein found in body fluids and in the ECM (7). Targeting of Fn by several pathogens has been shown to be important in the establishment or dissemination of infection (8). Bacterial Fn-binding proteins were first discovered in Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Streptococcus pyogenes and many other Gram-positive and Gram-negative microbes (9–11). The majority of reported streptococcal and staphylococcal Fn-binding proteins are characterized by the presence of an N-terminal signal sequence, which is needed for export of the protein to the cell surface via Sec-dependent secretion, and an LPXTG motif at the C-terminal end for covalent anchoring to peptidoglycan. These proteins also possess specific signature repeat motifs (35 to 40 residues) in the C terminus, which mediate Fn binding (12, 13). Streptococcus pneumoniae also expresses another type of adhesin, known as the pneumococcal adherence and virulence factor A (PavA) protein (14), that lacks the above-mentioned features of prototypic Fn-binding proteins (15, 16). Nonetheless, PavA has been shown to be present on the surfaces of S. pneumoniae cells and to bind to immobilized Fn (14). Notably, isogenic pavA deletion mutants showed highly (approximately 104-fold) attenuated virulence in a mouse sepsis model, suggesting a direct role for PavA in pneumococcal pathogenesis (14). Attenuation of the virulence of PavA-deficient pneumococcal strains was also observed in a mouse meningitis model, and these strains also showed substantially reduced adherence to and internalization by epithelial cell lines (17). These results are consistent with the finding that PavA is important for the ability of pneumococci to escape phagocytosis and to induce adaptive immune responses (18). In addition, Kadioglu and colleagues demonstrated that PavA is required for successful colonization and long-term carriage on the murine nasopharynx and for the systemic spread of pneumococci (19).
PavA homologues have been identified in other streptococci; these include Streptococcus gordonii FbpA (20), Streptococcus pyogenes FBP54 (21, 22), and Streptococcus mutans SmFnB (23). A similar report showed that SfbA, a PavA homologue of group B streptococci, is important in the interaction of these bacteria with the blood-brain barrier endothelium and in the pathogenesis of neonatal meningitis (24). Recently, Torelli et al. identified EfbA, a PavA homologue in Enterococcus faecalis, and demonstrated that the derived recombinant protein binds to immobilized Fn and plays a role in the pathogenesis of UTIs (25).
The present work was initiated to identify and study the PavA homologue of E. faecium and its contribution to Fn adherence in the context of infection. Here we show that Fnm, encoded by the E. faecium homologue of S. pneumoniae pavA, is an Fn-binding protein. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the fnm deletion on the ability of E. faecium TX82 to bind to Fn, and we demonstrate that Fnm is important in the pathogenesis of experimental endocarditis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and culture conditions.
The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Enterococci were routinely grown at 37°C in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and agar, or in M17 broth (both from Difco Laboratories), unless otherwise indicated. Escherichia coli strains were cultured at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and agar (Difco Laboratories). The following antibiotic concentrations were used for enterococci: ampicillin, 32 μg/ml; erythromycin, 10 μg/ml; gentamicin, 200 μg/ml. For E. coli, the concentrations used were 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 25 μg/ml gentamicin.
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains used in this study
| Strain or plasmid | Descriptiona | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| E. coli | ||
| DH5α | General cloning host | Stratagene |
| EC1000 | Strain carrying the repA gene for replication of pHOU1 | 28 |
| BL21(DE3) | Strain for recombinant protein expression | Life Technologies |
| E. faecium | ||
| TX82 | Nosocomial isolate (endocarditis); Ampr Vanr Ermr | 59 |
| TX6128 | TX82Δfnm; an fnm markerless deletion mutant | This study |
| TX6155 | TX82Δfnm::fnm; a derivative of TX6128 with fnm restored in situ in the chromosome | This study |
| E. faecalis CK111 | Conjugative donor; provides repA in trans for pHOU1 replication | 29 |
| Plasmids | ||
| pHOU1 | Vector for allelic exchange in E. faecium; carries the p-chloro-phenylalanine counterselectable marker; Genr | 27 |
| pTX6128 | pHOU1 derivative carrying a 1,719-bp BamHI/SphI fragment for deletion of fnm | This study |
| pTX6155 | Vector for reconstitution of fnm containing a 3,180-bp fragment cloned into pHOU1 | This study |
| pET19b | Vector for protein overexpression in E. coli containing an N-terminal histidine-tagged fusion; Ampr | This study |
| pETFnm01 | pET19b derivative carrying the construct for full-length Fnm protein overexpression; Ampr | This study |
| pETFnm02 | pET19b derivative carrying the construct for overexpression of Fnm1-295; Ampr | This study |
| pETFnm03 | pET19b derivative carrying the construct for overexpression of Fnm1-414; Ampr | This study |
| pETFnm04 | pET19b derivative carrying the construct for overexpression of Fnm416-535; Ampr | This study |
Ampr, ampicillin resistant; Ermr, erythromycin resistant; Genr, gentamicin resistant; Vanr, vancomycin resistant.
DNA techniques.
E. faecium genomic DNA was isolated from a single colony after overnight growth in BHI broth, as described previously (26). Plasmids were isolated from E. coli using Wizard Plus SV MiniPreps system columns (Promega Corporation). Phusion DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, United Kingdom) was employed for PCR amplification. Primers were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). DNA fragments were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up system columns (Promega Corporation). Restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase (both from New England BioLabs, United Kingdom) were used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The DNA sequencing service was provided by Genewiz Inc., South Plainfield, NJ, USA.
Construction of an fnm deletion mutant and reconstitution of fnm.
Mutants were generated using pHOU1, a pheS*-based counterselection system, as described previously (27). Briefly, to construct an fnm deletion mutant of E. faecium TX82, the upstream DNA region flanking the fnm gene (672 bp) together with the initial 147 bp of the Fnm-encoding region and the 903-bp downstream flanking sequence were amplified by two independent PCRs using primer pairs fnmUpF/fnmUpR and fnmDownF/fnmDownR, respectively (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The two fragments were then fused by SOE-PCR (splicing by overlap extension PCR). The resulting 1,722-bp product was digested with restriction enzymes BamHI and SphI and was cloned into similarly digested pHOU1 (27), giving pTX6128. pTX6128 was electroporated into E. coli EC1000, which supplies RepA in trans for its replication (28). Transformants were screened for the presence of the insert, and the fragment was sequenced using the primer pair FbpOutF/FbpOutR (see Table S1). pTX6128 was electroporated into E. faecalis CK111 using standard procedures (29, 30) before transfer to E. faecium TX82 by filter matings. The mating mixture was cultivated on BHI plates containing gentamicin and erythromycin for the detection of single-crossover integrants and was then replated onto MM9–yeast extract–glucose (MM9YEG) medium containing p-chloro-phenylalanine (p-Cl-Phe) (7 mM) to select for vector excision. The excision of pTX6128 was confirmed by the absence of growth on BHI-gentamicin plates; colonies lacking fnm were detected by PCR, and one of these was designated TX6128.
For the restoration of fnm in TX6128, the fnm gene with its native promoter was amplified by PCR with primer pair fnmUpF/fnmDownR (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Following digestion with BamHI and SphI, the resulting 3,180-bp fragment was cloned into pHOU1, giving pTX6155, which, after confirmation of the insert by sequencing, was electroporated into E. faecalis CK111, transferred to E. faecium TX6128, and then processed as described above. The resulting fnm-reconstituted strain was named TX6155.
The deletion and restoration of the fnm gene in TX6128 and TX6155, respectively, were confirmed by sequencing of the PCR product amplified with primer pair FbpOutF/FbpOutR. In addition, the identities of the strains were confirmed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis according to a method described previously (31).
Whole-cell fibronectin binding assays.
E. faecium TX82, TX6128, and TX6155 cells were harvested by centrifugation from exponential-phase cultures in BHI medium supplemented with 40% serum (BHIS), and the concentration was adjusted to an optical density (OD) at 600 nm of 1.0 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). Immulon 2B microwell plates (Thermo Scientific, Woburn, MA) were coated overnight with 20 μg/ml of Fn. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a negative control. Wells were blocked with 2% BSA at room temperature (RT) for 1 h, and after three washes with PBS, a 100-μl volume of a cell suspension was added. Plates were incubated for 2 h at RT. After three washes with PBS to remove unbound cells, cells were fixed with Bouin's fixative solution (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) for 30 min at RT. Each well was then washed with PBS and was stained with 1% (wt/vol) crystal violet for 30 min at RT. Finally, adherent cells were dissolved in an ethanol-acetone solution (80% and 20%, respectively), and the absorbance at 570 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Experiments were performed 3 times using 8 technical replicates each time. The adherence of TX6128 and TX6155 to Fn was expressed as the percentage of binding relative to the binding of Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF (defined as 100%).
Expression and purification of Fnm and its truncated derivatives.
DNA regions corresponding to full-length Fnm or to its truncated derivative Fnm1–295, Fnm1–414, or Fnm416–535 were amplified from TX82 genomic DNA using specific primers (listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material), which introduced NdeI and BamHI restriction sites. The fragments were cloned in frame into plasmid pET19b, and the overexpression constructs were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). Cultures were grown to exponential phase, and protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) for 3 h at 37°C. Histidine-tagged recombinant Fnm (rFnm) and its derivatives were purified by Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) chromatography using His GraviTrap columns (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The eluted proteins were desalted using PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare). The protein concentration of each sample was determined by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method (Pierce). Recombinant proteins were stored at −70°C until use.
Generation of polyclonal antibodies and purification of antigen-specific IgGs.
Polyclonal rabbit antibodies against rFnm were raised at Bethyl Laboratories (Montgomery, TX, USA), and rFnm-specific antibodies were purified using CnBr-Sepharose 4B coupled with rFnm as described elsewhere (32). Eluted antibodies were neutralized immediately using 0.1 M Tris (pH 8.0) and were dialyzed extensively against PBS, and concentrations were determined using an IgG molar absorption coefficient value of 210,000 M−1 cm−1 and a molecular mass of 150,000 Da.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The binding of rFnm to ECM proteins was measured as described previously (33). Medium binding Immulon 2B microwell plates (Thermo Scientific, Woburn, MA) were coated with ECM proteins (1 μg/100 μl) dissolved in 50 mM carbonate buffer and were incubated overnight at 4°C. Wells were blocked with 2% BSA at RT for 1 h and were then washed with PBS, followed by the addition of various concentrations of recombinant proteins. After incubation for 2 h at RT, plates were washed three times with PBS-T (PBS with 0.05% Tween 20), and the binding of full-length rFnm and truncated versions to ECM was detected by incubation with anti-His monoclonal antibodies (GE Healthcare) and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories); p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) was used for signal detection. The absorbance at 405 nm was then determined with a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).
Extraction of CWA proteins with mutanolysin and immunoblot analysis.
E. faecium strains were grown for 5 h or 16 h in BHI or BHIS broth, and cell wall-anchored (CWA) proteins were extracted with mutanolysin as described previously (34). After measurement of the protein concentrations by the BCA method (Pierce), equal amounts of mutanolysin-extracted proteins were resolved using SDS-PAGE gels under reducing conditions, and the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with 2% skim milk in PBS for 1 h, the membrane was probed with affinity-purified anti-rFnm antibodies, followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-goat IgG antibodies, and the signal was detected by using the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent reagent (Thermo Scientific).
Experimental endocarditis and urinary tract infection (UTI) models.
The animal experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the institutional policies stipulated by the Animal Welfare Committee, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Aortic valve endocarditis was induced in white Sprague-Dawley rats according to a method published previously (35). Briefly, catheterized rats were inoculated intravenously, via the tail vein, with a mixture of TX82 and TX6128 (at a ∼1:1 ratio, determined by absorbance at 600 nm) 24 h after catheter placement. The inocula were then serially diluted and were plated to determine the actual CFU and percentage of each strain. At 48 h postinfection, animals were euthanized, hearts were aseptically removed, and the aortic valves were excised, weighed, and homogenized in 1 ml of saline solution. Serial dilutions were plated onto Enterococcosel Agar (EA) (Difco Laboratories) supplemented with 6 μg/ml vancomycin. Colonies were randomly picked into wells of 96-well microtiter plates containing BHI broth, grown overnight, replica plated onto BHI agar, and transferred to a filter overlaid on the BHI plate. The colonies were then lysed in situ, and the filters were hybridized under high-stringency conditions (36), using intragenic DNA probes of fnm and ddl (37) to calculate the percentages of wild-type and mutant colonies recovered from aortic valves.
For UTI infection experiments, 4- to 6-week-old female ICR mice (Harlan Laboratories) were used. The experiments were conducted according to the methodology previously adopted by Singh et al. (38).
Statistical analysis.
Statistical comparisons were performed with a paired Student t test by using GraphPad Prism, version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Differences were considered significant at a P value of ≤0.05.
RESULTS
Genetic organization of E. faecium TX82 fnm.
Using the S. pneumoniae PavA sequence as the query for tBLASTn searches, we identified a homologous gene in the genome of E. faecium TX82. This gene was also found in all currently available E. faecium genome sequences (data not shown). Figure 1 depicts the genomic organization of the pavA homologue in TX82 (HMPREF9522_00874). It is 1,707 bp long and is flanked upstream by genes encoding a putative transposase and ABC transporters and downstream by a gene coding for a LysR-like transcriptional regulator. The putative protein consists of 568 amino acids (aa) and contains an N-terminal region identified by InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) as a homologue of the N terminus (PF05833; aa 4 to 431) of S. gordonii fibronectin-binding protein A (FbpA), followed by a domain of unknown function (Duf814; aa 451 to 535) (Fig. 1, expanded segment). Based on the predicted function, we designated this protein Fnm (fibronectin-binding protein of Enterococcus faecium). As with other reported PavA-like proteins, Fnm lacks an N-terminal signal sequence for exporting the protein and the typical Gram-positive LPXTG cell wall anchor motif at the C terminus (14). This protein shares 52% identity and 70% similarity with S. pneumoniae PavA (Fig. 2). In addition, Fnm is 49 to 70% identical and 68 to 84% similar to E. faecalis EfbA (25), S. pyogenes FBP54 (39), S. gordonii FnBpA (20), group B streptococcus SfbA (24), and S. mutans SmFnB (23) (Fig. 2).
FIG 1.
Diagram of the genetic organization and domain mapping of Enterococcus faecium TX82 Fnm. The fnm locus is flanked upstream by transposase- and ABC transporter-encoding genes and downstream by a gene coding for a LysR-like transcriptional regulator. The expanded segment shows the domain organization of Fnm. The annotated FbpA homologue domain spans the region from amino acid 4 to 431; the Duf814 domain (a domain of unknown function; aa 451 to 535) is commonly found in association with the FbpA domain.
FIG 2.
Alignment of the amino acid sequence of E. faecium TX82 Fnm with those of other reported PavA homologue proteins: E. faecalis EfbA, S. pyogenes FBP54, S. pneumoniae PavA, S. gordonii FnBpA, group B streptococcus SfbA, S. mutans SmFnB. Residue conservation is indicated by shades of blue. Highly conserved sequences are shown in dark blue; a low degree of consensus is indicated in light blue. The red and green lines under the residues indicate the FbpA and Duf814 domains, respectively. The alignment was generated using the MUSCLE program, by applying the default settings.
The recombinant E. faecium Fnm protein binds to Fn and other components of the ECM.
To determine if Fnm has the ability to bind to Fn, we expressed full-length Fnm as a histidine-tagged fusion protein in E. coli and purified it by Ni-NTA chromatography. The recombinant Fnm showed concentration-dependent binding to immobilized Fn, and this binding appeared to be saturated at concentrations of added rFnm above 5 pM (Fig. 3A). Significant amounts of rFnm also bound to laminin and type V collagen, and intermediate levels of rFnm binding to wells coated with fibrinogen, collagen I, or heparan sulfate were seen (Fig. 3B). Little to no binding to transferrin, BSA, heparin, hyaluronic acid, mucin, or collagen IV was observed (Fig. 3B).
FIG 3.
Binding of full-length rFnm to immobilized ECM components as detected by ELISA. (A) Concentration-dependent binding of rFnm to fibronectin. (B) Binding of rFnm to other immobilized ECM components. ELISA plates were coated with ECM proteins (1 μg/well), which were incubated with various concentrations of rFnm. The binding of rFnm to ECM proteins was detected using anti-His tag antibodies. Data represent means ± standard deviations.
In order to investigate the functional domains of the protein required for Fn binding, truncated versions of rFnm (comprising aa 1 to 295, aa 1 to 414, or aa 416 to 535) were generated in E. coli, purified, and tested for their abilities to bind to Fn (Fig. 4A). The truncated proteins rFnm1–295, containing part of the in silico-designated N-terminal Fn-binding domain, and rFnm414–535, corresponding to the C-terminal Duf814 domain only, showed significantly less (P < 0.05) binding to Fn than did full-length rFnm (Fig. 4B), although some binding remained. However, a protein containing the extended N-terminal FbpA domain (aa 1 to 414) bound to Fn at levels similar to those of full-length rFnm. These data demonstrate that the N-terminal domain alone is sufficient for wild-type-level Fn binding. This finding differs from earlier reports on S. pneumoniae PavA, where the C-terminally truncated proteins showed no binding to Fn (14).
FIG 4.

(A) Domain structures of truncated rFnm polypeptides. (B) Binding of truncated rFnm polypeptides to immobilized fibronectin as detected by ELISA. Equimolar concentrations of full-length rFnm or truncated versions of rFnm were tested for reactivity to immobilized fibronectin (1 μg/well).
To confirm the role of Fnm in the binding of E. faecium TX82 cells to Fn, we constructed an in-frame markerless fnm mutant (TX6128) and a knocked-in (reconstituted) strain in which the gene was restored in its native site in the chromosome of the fnm deletion mutant (TX6155). TX6128 and TX6155 exhibited growth rates similar to that of TX82 in BHIS at 37°C (data not shown). In subsequent assays of whole-cell binding to immobilized Fn, the deletion mutant displayed a level of binding 29% lower (P < 0.001) than that of TX82 (Fig. 5). The remaining ability of the deletion mutant to bind Fn could be attributed to the redundancy of fibronectin-binding proteins in E. faecium, including the WxL domain-containing proteins SwpA-C, LwpA-C, and DufA-C (26). Reconstitution of fnm in TX6155 restored the wild-type phenotype.
FIG 5.

Binding of E. faecium TX82, TX6128, and TX6155 cells to fibronectin. Fibronectin (20 μg/well) was immobilized on a microtiter plate, and BHIS-grown E. faecium TX82, TX6128, and TX6155 cells were added to the wells and were allowed to adhere for 2 h. Adherent bacteria were detected by crystal violet staining. Experiments were performed three times each with eight technical replicates. Values are means ± standard deviations. *, P < 0.05; ns, not significant. The binding of TX6128 and TX6155 to fibronectin was expressed relative to the adherence ability of E. faecium TX82 (defined as 100%).
Fnm is expressed on the surfaces of Enterococcus faecium cells.
Next, we examined whether Fnm is expressed on the surfaces of E. faecium cells. For this purpose, we generated cell wall extracts by mutanolysin digestion of TX82, TX6128, and TX6155 cells. Since serum has been shown to act as a biological cue that elicits adherence to the extracellular matrix proteins of some other bacteria (40), E. faecium cells were grown in BHI broth in the presence or absence of horse serum at 37°C, and samples were collected at the exponential and stationary phases of growth. Immunoblotting using anti-Fnm specific antibodies showed that Fnm was found only in the cell wall extracts of the wild-type strain TX82 and the fnm-reconstituted strain TX6155; it was not detected in the cell wall extract of the deletion mutant TX6128 (Fig. 6). In addition, it was evident that Fnm expression was increased in the presence of 40% horse serum and that expression levels were higher in the stationary phase than in the exponential phase of growth (Fig. 6). No Fnm expression was detectable in the absence of serum, suggesting the possibility that stressful conditions may regulate the expression of Fnm protein in vivo.
FIG 6.

Western blot of cell wall-associated protein extracts. E. faecium strains were grown for 5 h (log phase) or 16 h (stationary phase) in BHI broth with or without 40% horse serum. CWA proteins were extracted by mutanolysin digestion and were immunoblotted with antibody against the rFnm protein. Only the sample collected from cells grown in BHIS for 16 h is shown for the deletion mutant TX6128, because all others were negative.
Fnm contributes to the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis in vivo.
Next, to determine whether a lack of Fnm translates into a reduced ability to cause infection, we used an established model of E. faecium endocarditis to test the fnm deletion mutant TX6128. For this purpose, catheterized rats were injected intravenously, through the tail vein, with a mixture of TX82 and TX6128 as an inoculum. CFU determination showed that the mixed inoculum administered consisted of 47% wild-type cells (2.9 × 109 CFU) and 53% (3.4 × 109 CFU) fnm deletion mutant cells. As shown in Fig. 7, TX6128 was significantly attenuated relative to the wild-type strain, TX82 (P, ≤0.0001 by a paired Student t test). This suggests a clear advantage of TX82 over the fnm deletion mutant and indicates a role for Fnm in the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis. With a mixed inoculum containing equal numbers of CFU of TX6128 and TX6155, chromosomal reintroduction of fnm resulted in the restoration of the infective phenotype at wild-type levels in 40% of the animals (n = 5) (data not shown).
FIG 7.

Attenuation of a nonpolar fnm deletion mutant in a mixed-inoculum infection model of rat endocarditis. Rats were sacrificed at 48 h postinfection, and bacteria were recovered from vegetations. Horizontal lines indicate mean percentages (P ≤ 0.0001 by a paired t test) of bacteria in the aortic valves or in the inoculum.
Because the Fnm homologue protein of E. faecalis (EfbA) has been shown to contribute to UTIs in a murine model (25), we tested whether Fnm plays a role in the pathogenicity of UTIs caused by E. faecium TX82. Mice were inoculated via an intraurethral catheter with a mixture consisting of 53% TX82 cells and 47% TX6128 cells. However, as shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material, TX82 and TX6128 were recovered at similar rates from mouse kidneys (P = 0.6544) or bladders (P = 0.0562), indicating that TX6128 was not attenuated relative to the wild-type strain.
DISCUSSION
The process of bacterial infection is initiated by the interaction of microorganisms with components of host tissues. Previous studies have shown that E. faecium cells express a variety of surface proteins that can contribute to adhesion (41). These include an endocarditis- and biofilm-associated pilus protein (Ebpfm) (42), an enterococcal surface protein (Esp) (43), serine–glutamate repeat-containing protein A (SgrA) (44), and the WxL proteins (26). In addition, we identified a significant association between collagen adherence and the presence of a functional acm gene, encoding an adhesin of collagen, in clinical but not community isolates (45, 46). Furthermore, Acm was found to be important in the pathogenesis of infective endocarditis (47). A report on the adherence of E. faecium to Fn demonstrated a greater ability of clinical isolates, especially endocarditis-derived nosocomial isolates, than of nonclinical isolates to bind to Fn (48). Also, in other Gram-positive bacteria, the presence of Fn-binding proteins on the surface was shown to play a critical role in the infection process (49). Thus, it is possible that interactions with Fn favor the initiation and establishment of E. faecium infections.
In the present study, homology-driven mining of the genome of E. faecium TX82 identified fnm, encoding a protein that exhibits considerable identity to the anchorless, but surface-exposed, fibronectin-binding PavA protein of S. pneumoniae. Like PavA, Fnm is an atypical Fn-binding protein in that it lacks a secretory sequence, identifiable Fn-binding repeats, and a conventional LPXTG anchoring motif (Fig. 1). Fnm shares high similarity with PavA and other homologous proteins found in streptococci and in E. faecalis (Fig. 2), suggesting a conserved function, which might be different from its role as an adhesin. All the PavA homologues contain a large N-terminal domain annotated as an Fn-binding domain (“FbpA”) followed by a C-terminal Duf814 domain. While Duf814 has yet to be characterized, it has often been reported in association with the FbpA domain, in archeal and eukaryotic as well as prokaryotic adhesins (11). Since all the PavA homologues lack conventional secretory and anchorage sequences, the existence of a novel, yet to be determined mechanism of secretion and cell surface association has been postulated (14). Bacterial cell surface association, despite the absence of a putative signal sequence and a cell wall anchor motif, has also been exhibited by other virulence-associated proteins, such as the streptococcal surface dehydrogenase, the surface enolase of S. pyogenes, and the pneumococcal α-enolase (50–52). It is also possible that this protein has another function, perhaps intracellular, and that the adherence phenotype is a “moonlighting” function, as suggested for Gnd (50–53).
In our work here, we found that full-length recombinant Fnm binds to Fn in a concentration-dependent manner and also binds to other host ECM proteins, such as laminin and collagen V (Fig. 3). Previous reports on S. pneumoniae PavA demonstrated that the C-terminal 189 residues were essential for the binding of protein to Fn (14). However, Courtney et al. showed that the N-terminal region of FBP54 is responsible for the majority of the binding of S. pyogenes to Fn (39). For E. faecium Fnm, we mapped the principal Fn-binding domain to the N-terminal half of the protein. However, there was modest binding of Fnm416–535 to immobilized Fn, suggesting that the C-terminal Duf814 domain could mediate a reduced level of adherence (Fig. 4).
The ability of bacteria to sense and finely regulate the production of virulence factors is important in their transition from colonizers to pathogens and for avoidance of the host immune defense (54). Several enterococcal adhesins have been shown to be conditionally expressed in response to environmental stresses, including growth at 46°C or the presence of serum (34, 55). A study that examined the adherence phenotypes of diverse E. faecalis strains to ECM proteins after in vitro growth under conditions mimicking physiological conditions demonstrated that serum promotes enterococcal binding to Fn (40). In keeping with these data, we showed that Fnm is found in cell wall extracts of E. faecium TX82 grown in BHI medium supplemented with 40% horse serum but not in extracts of TX82 grown in BHI medium only (Fig. 6). These results suggest that Fnm is not constitutively expressed by E. faecium but is elicited under certain conditions, where serum may serve as a signal to induce the production of Fnm on the cell surface (40). Inactivation of fnm was associated with a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in the binding of E. faecium TX82 to fibronectin (Fig. 5), in accordance with the absence of this adhesin from the cell surface. It would be of interest to examine human sera for the presence of antibodies against Fnm in order to provide evidence of in vivo expression in humans.
Infective endocarditis, a disease that involves bacterial infection of heart valves and/or the inner surface of the heart chamber (endothelium), is often initiated by damage to the endothelium that disrupts the integrity of the aortic valves and exposes underlying tissues and ECM, including Fn (56). Enterococci may adhere directly to the site of damage or to sterile thrombotic vegetations, consisting of fibrin and platelets, leading to infected vegetations. Because enterococci are the third most common etiological cause of this disease (57), we hypothesized that Fnm could play a role in the formation of E. faecium vegetations on the aortic valves. Deletion of fnm from the genome of E. faecium TX82 resulted in significant attenuation of the ability of the isogenic mutant, TX6128, to compete with the wild type in the infection of catheter-induced vegetations, demonstrating that Fnm is an important factor in the experimental model of endocarditis caused by E. faecium. The reintroduction of fnm into its original chromosomal location resulted in a fully restored wild-type phenotype in 40% of the infected animals (data not shown); the genetic basis for the lack of restoration of Fnm function in all animals is under investigation in our laboratory. Interestingly, we have observed a similar “bimodal” pattern, with one or two animals showing the reverse of the results for the others, with several other enterococcal mutants tested previously (35, 47, 58).
In a recent investigation by Torelli et al., the Fnm homologue protein of E. faecalis JH2-2 (EfbA) was shown to contribute to pathogenesis in a murine model of ascending urinary tract infection, a finding consistent with an increased trophism for the kidneys and bladder (25). Interestingly, fnm deletion did not result in observable effects in the kidneys in a similar UTI model, suggesting that E. faecium Fnm does not contribute to this infection (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
In summary, our study reports the identification and partial characterization of Fnm, an Fn-binding protein of E. faecium belonging to the PavA-like class of adhesins. We demonstrated that Fnm plays a key role in the binding of E. faecium to Fn and to a wide range of ECM molecules. Deletion of fnm diminished in vitro adherence to immobilized Fn and fibrinogen and resulted in significant attenuation of the ability of E. faecium TX82 to cause infective endocarditis in vivo in a rat model. Taking these findings together, our report contributes to the understanding of the fundamentals of interaction between E. faecium and its host.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Karen Jacques-Palaz for technical assistance.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 AI047923 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to B.E.M.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00885-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Höök M. 2014. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:49–62. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Höök M. 1994. MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 48:585–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murray BE. 2000. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. N Engl J Med 342:710–721. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003093421007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leavis HL, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ. 2006. Identification of high-risk enterococcal clonal complexes: global dispersion and antibiotic resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK. 2008. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:996–1011. doi: 10.1086/591861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB, Scheld M, Spellberg B, Bartlett J. 2009. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 48:1–12. doi: 10.1086/595011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.To WS, Midwood KS. 2011. Plasma and cellular fibronectin: distinct and independent functions during tissue repair. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 4:21. doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-4-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Knodler LA, Celli J, Finlay BB. 2001. Pathogenic trickery: deception of host cell processes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:578–588. doi: 10.1038/35085062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuusela P. 1978. Fibronectin binds to Staphylococcus aureus. Nature 276:718–720. doi: 10.1038/276718a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Talay SR, Valentin-Weigand P, Jerlstrom PG, Timmis KN, Chhatwal GS. 1992. Fibronectin-binding protein of Streptococcus pyogenes: sequence of the binding domain involved in adherence of streptococci to epithelial cells. Infect Immun 60:3837–3844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Henderson B, Nair S, Pallas J, Williams MA. 2011. Fibronectin: a multidomain host adhesin targeted by bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35:147–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Flock JI, Froman G, Jonsson K, Guss B, Signas C, Nilsson B, Raucci G, Höök M, Wadstrom T, Lindberg M. 1987. Cloning and expression of the gene for a fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus. EMBO J 6:2351–2357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Signäs C, Raucci G, Jonsson K, Lindgren PE, Anantharamaiah GM, Höök M, Lindberg M. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of the gene for a fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus: use of this peptide sequence in the synthesis of biologically active peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:699–703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Holmes AR, McNab R, Millsap KW, Rohde M, Hammerschmidt S, Mawdsley JL, Jenkinson HF. 2001. The pavA gene of Streptococcus pneumoniae encodes a fibronectin-binding protein that is essential for virulence. Mol Microbiol 41:1395–1408. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02610.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McGavin MJ, Gurusiddappa S, Lindgren PE, Lindberg M, Raucci G, Höök M. 1993. Fibronectin receptors from Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus. Involvement of conserved residues in ligand binding J Biol Chem 268:23946–23953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sun Q, Smith GM, Zahradka C, McGavin MJ. 1997. Identification of D motif epitopes in Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein for the production of antibody inhibitors of fibronectin binding. Infect Immun 65:537–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pracht D, Elm C, Gerber J, Bergmann S, Rohde M, Seiler M, Kim KS, Jenkinson HF, Nau R, Hammerschmidt S. 2005. PavA of Streptococcus pneumoniae modulates adherence, invasion, and meningeal inflammation. Infect Immun 73:2680–2689. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2680-2689.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Noske N, Kammerer U, Rohde M, Hammerschmidt S. 2009. Pneumococcal interaction with human dendritic cells: phagocytosis, survival, and induced adaptive immune response are manipulated by PavA. J Immunol 183:1952–1963. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kadioglu A, Brewin H, Hartel T, Brittan JL, Klein M, Hammerschmidt S, Jenkinson HF. 2010. Pneumococcal protein PavA is important for nasopharyngeal carriage and development of sepsis. Mol Oral Microbiol 25:50–60. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2009.00561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Christie J, McNab R, Jenkinson HF. 2002. Expression of fibronectin-binding protein FbpA modulates adhesion in Streptococcus gordonii. Microbiology 148:1615–1625. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-6-1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kawabata S, Kunitomo E, Terao Y, Nakagawa I, Kikuchi K, Totsuka K, Hamada S. 2001. Systemic and mucosal immunizations with fibronectin-binding protein FBP54 induce protective immune responses against Streptococcus pyogenes challenge in mice. Infect Immun 69:924–930. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.924-930.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Courtney HS, Dale JB, Hasty DI. 1996. Differential effects of the streptococcal fibronectin-binding protein, FBP54, on adhesion of group A streptococci to human buccal cells and HEp-2 tissue culture cells. Infect Immun 64:2415–2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Miller-Torbert TA, Sharma S, Holt RG. 2008. Inactivation of a gene for a fibronectin-binding protein of the oral bacterium Streptococcus mutans partially impairs its adherence to fibronectin. Microb Pathog 45:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mu R, Kim BJ, Paco C, Del Rosario Y, Courtney HS, Doran KS. 2014. Identification of a group B streptococcal fibronectin binding protein, SfbA, that contributes to invasion of brain endothelium and development of meningitis. Infect Immun 82:2276–2286. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01559-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Torelli R, Serror P, Bugli F, Paroni Sterbini F, Florio AR, Stringaro A, Colone M, De Carolis E, Martini C, Giard JC, Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B. 2012. The PavA-like fibronectin-binding protein of Enterococcus faecalis, EfbA, is important for virulence in a mouse model of ascending urinary tract infection. J Infect Dis 206:952–960. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Galloway-Peña JR, Liang X, Singh KV, Yadav P, Chang C, La Rosa SL, Shelburne S, Ton-That H, Höök M, Murray BE. 2015. The identification and functional characterization of WxL proteins from Enterococcus faecium reveal surface proteins involved in extracellular matrix interactions. J Bacteriol 197:882–892. doi: 10.1128/JB.02288-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Panesso D, Montealegre MC, Rincon S, Mojica MF, Rice LB, Singh KV, Murray BE, Arias CA. 2011. The hylEfm gene in pHylEfm of Enterococcus faecium is not required in pathogenesis of murine peritonitis. BMC Microbiol 11:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leenhouts K, Buist G, Bolhuis A, ten Berge A, Kiel J, Mierau I, Dabrowska M, Venema G, Kok J. 1996. A general system for generating unlabelled gene replacements in bacterial chromosomes. Mol Gen Genet 253:217–224. doi: 10.1007/s004380050315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kristich CJ, Chandler JR, Dunny GM. 2007. Development of a host-genotype-independent counterselectable marker and a high-frequency conjugative delivery system and their use in genetic analysis of Enterococcus faecalis. Plasmid 57:131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Holo H, Nes IF. 1989. High-frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:3119–3123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murray BE, Singh KV, Heath JD, Sharma BR, Weinstock GM. 1990. Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction endonucleases with infrequent recognition sites. J Clin Microbiol 28:2059–2063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Prakash VP, Qin X, Höök M, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2008. Identification and phenotypic characterization of a second collagen adhesin, Scm, and genome-based identification and analysis of 13 other predicted MSCRAMMs, including four distinct pilus loci, in Enterococcus faecium. Microbiology 154:3199–3211. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/017319-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Zhao M, Murray BE. 2011. Relative contributions of Ebp Pili and the collagen adhesin ace to host extracellular matrix protein adherence and experimental urinary tract infection by Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Infect Immun 79:2901–2910. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00038-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Garsin DA, Höök M, Erlandsen SL, Murray BE. 2006. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Invest 116:2799–2807. doi: 10.1172/JCI29021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Sillanpää J, Murray BE. 2010. Importance of the collagen adhesin ace in pathogenesis and protection against Enterococcus faecalis experimental endocarditis. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000716. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Singh KV, Coque TM, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 1998. In vivo testing of an Enterococcus faecalis efaA mutant and use of efaA homologs for species identification. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 21:323–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dutka-Malen S, Evers S, Courvalin P. 1995. Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 33:24–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2007. Importance of the ebp (endocarditis- and biofilm-associated pilus) locus in the pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis ascending urinary tract infection. J Infect Dis 195:1671–1677. doi: 10.1086/517524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Courtney HS, Li Y, Dale JB, Hasty DL. 1994. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of a fibronectin/fibrinogen-binding protein from group A streptococci. Infect Immun 62:3937–3946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2008. Role played by serum, a biological cue, in the adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to extracellular matrix proteins, collagen, fibrinogen, and fibronectin. J Infect Dis 197:1728–1736. doi: 10.1086/588143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garsin DA, Frank KL, Silanpää J, Ausubel FM, Hartke A, Shankar N, Murray BE. 7 February 2014. Pathogenesis and models of enterococcal infection. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190426/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Prakash VP, Fothergill T, Ton-That H, Murray BE. 2010. Characterization of the ebpfm pilus-encoding operon of Enterococcus faecium and its role in biofilm formation and virulence in a murine model of urinary tract infection. Virulence 1:236–246. doi: 10.4161/viru.1.4.11966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Heikens E, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ. 2007. Enterococcal surface protein Esp is important for biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecium E1162. J Bacteriol 189:8233–8240. doi: 10.1128/JB.01205-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hendrickx AP, van Luit-Asbroek M, Schapendonk CM, van Wamel WJ, Braat JC, Wijnands LM, Bonten MJ, Willems RJ. 2009. SgrA, a nidogen-binding LPXTG surface adhesin implicated in biofilm formation, and EcbA, a collagen binding MSCRAMM, are two novel adhesins of hospital-acquired Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 77:5097–5106. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00275-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Okhuysen PC, Murray BE. 2008. A functional collagen adhesin gene, acm, in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium correlates with the recent success of this emerging nosocomial pathogen. Infect Immun 76:4110–4119. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00375-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nallapareddy SR, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2003. Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium exhibit strain-specific collagen binding mediated by Acm, a new member of the MSCRAMM family. Mol Microbiol 47:1733–1747. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2008. Contribution of the collagen adhesin Acm to pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecium in experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun 76:4120–4128. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00376-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhao M, Sillanpää J, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2009. Adherence to host extracellular matrix and serum components by Enterococcus faecium isolates of diverse origin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 301:77–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01806.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schwarz-Linek U, Höök M, Potts JR. 2004. The molecular basis of fibronectin-mediated bacterial adherence to host cells. Mol Microbiol 52:631–641. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Daniely D, Portnoi M, Shagan M, Porgador A, Givon-Lavi N, Ling E, Dagan R, Mizrachi Nebenzahl Y. 2006. Pneumococcal 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase, a putative adhesin, induces protective immune response in mice. Clin Exp Immunol 144:254–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03047.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fu S, Yuan F, Zhang M, Tan C, Chen H, Bei W. 2012. Cloning, expression and characterization of a cell wall surface protein, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, of Haemophilus parasuis. Res Vet Sci 93:57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tan C, Fu S, Liu M, Jin M, Liu J, Bei W, Chen H. 2008. Cloning, expression and characterization of a cell wall surface protein, 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase, of Streptococcus suis serotype 2. Vet Microbiol 130:363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tan C, Liu M, Liu J, Yuan F, Fu S, Liu Y, Jin M, Bei W, Chen H. 2009. Vaccination with Streptococcus suis serotype 2 recombinant 6PGD protein provides protection against S. suis infection in swine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:78–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Finlay BB, Falkow S. 1997. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:136–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2006. Ligand-signaled upregulation of Enterococcus faecalis ace transcription, a mechanism for modulating host-E. faecalis interaction. Infect Immun 74:4982–4989. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00476-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hamill RJ. 1987. Role of fibronectin in infective endocarditis. Rev Infect Dis 9(Suppl 4):S360–S371. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.Supplement_4.S360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nigo M, Munita JM, Arias CA, Murray BE. 2014. What's new in the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis? Curr Infect Dis Rep 16:431. doi: 10.1007/s11908-014-0431-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Somarajan SR, Roh JH, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2014. CcpA is important for growth and virulence of Enterococcus faecium. Infect Immun 82:3580–3587. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01911-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Murray BE. 2006. Construction of improved temperature-sensitive and mobilizable vectors and their use for constructing mutations in the adhesin-encoding acm gene of poorly transformable clinical Enterococcus faecium strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:334–345. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.334-345.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



