Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1993 Jul;48(7):750–753. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.7.750

Normal range for transdiaphragmatic pressures during sniffs with catheter mounted transducers.

S A Evans 1, L Watson 1, A J Cowley 1, I D Johnston 1, W J Kinnear 1
PMCID: PMC464665  PMID: 8153926

Abstract

BACKGROUND--Transdiaphragmatic pressure (sniff PDI) during maximal sniffs is a useful clinical test of inspiratory muscle function. Although a normal range has been established for sniff PDI using air filled balloons, no comparable data are available for catheter mounted pressure transducers. METHODS--Using a single catheter with two pressure transducers 15 cm apart, oesophageal and gastric pressures were recorded in 50 normal volunteers (25 women), five of each sex from each decade between the third and seventh decades of life. Each subject performed 10 maximal sniffs at functional residual capacity. RESULTS--Mean (SD) sniff PDI was 149 (32) cm H2O in men and 127 (22) cm H2O in women. The lower limits of normal for sniff PDI (mean -1.96 x SD) after logarithmic transformation of the data were 95 and 78 cm H2O in men and women respectively. CONCLUSIONS--With this technique transdiaphragmatic pressure can be measured using a single catheter which can easily be cleaned and reused. The values for sniff PDI are similar to those recorded previously with air filled balloons, suggesting that the method of recording pressure does not significantly affect the values obtained.

Full text

PDF
750

Images in this article

750Image
on p.750

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beardsmore C. S., Wong Y. C., Stocks J., Silverman M. Assessment of the catheter tip pressure transducer for use in infant lung function tests. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1982 Nov;20(6):657–660. doi: 10.1007/BF02442517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Black L. F., Hyatt R. E. Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969 May;99(5):696–702. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.5.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chinn S. Statistics in respiratory medicine. 2. Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax. 1991 Jun;46(6):454–456. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.6.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Troyer A., Estenne M. Limitations of measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure in detecting diaphragmatic weakness. Thorax. 1981 Mar;36(3):169–174. doi: 10.1136/thx.36.3.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilbert R., Peppi D., Auchincloss J. H., Jr Measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure with a single gastric-esophageal probe. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Sep;47(3):628–630. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.47.3.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson A. C., Vinegar A. A technique for measuring frequency response of pressure, volume, and flow transducers. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Aug;47(2):462–467. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.47.2.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koulouris N., Mulvey D. A., Laroche C. M., Sawicka E. H., Green M., Moxham J. The measurement of inspiratory muscle strength by sniff esophageal, nasopharyngeal, and mouth pressures. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Mar;139(3):641–646. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/139.3.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leech J. A., Ghezzo H., Stevens D., Becklake M. R. Respiratory pressures and function in young adults. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Jul;128(1):17–23. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.128.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILIC-EMILI J., MEAD J., TURNER J. M., GLAUSER E. M. IMPROVED TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING PLEURAL PRESSURE FROM ESOPHAGEAL BALLOONS. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Mar;19:207–211. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Miller J. M., Moxham J., Green M. The maximal sniff in the assessment of diaphragm function in man. Clin Sci (Lond) 1985 Jul;69(1):91–96. doi: 10.1042/cs0690091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Panizza J. A., Finucane K. E. Comparison of balloon and transducer catheters for estimating lung elasticity. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1992 Jan;72(1):231–235. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.1.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Proulx P. A., Harf A., Lorino H., Atlan G., Laurent D. Dynamic characteristics of air-filled differential pressure transducers. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Mar;46(3):608–614. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.3.608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Trop D., Peeters R., Van de Woestijne K. P. Localization of recording site in the esophagus by means of cardiac artifacts. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Sep;29(3):283–287. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.29.3.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vincken W., Ghezzo H., Cosio M. G. Maximal static respiratory pressures in adults: normal values and their relationship to determinants of respiratory function. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987 Sep-Oct;23(5):435–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson S. H., Cooke N. T., Edwards R. H., Spiro S. G. Predicted normal values for maximal respiratory pressures in caucasian adults and children. Thorax. 1984 Jul;39(7):535–538. doi: 10.1136/thx.39.7.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. de Troyer A., Yernault J. C. Inspiratory muscle force in normal subjects and patients with interstitial lung disease. Thorax. 1980 Feb;35(2):92–100. doi: 10.1136/thx.35.2.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES