Abstract
In this paper, we report the estimates of outcrossing rates using open-pollinated progeny arrays of 40 BC1 individuals of Jatropha developed as a result of interspecific hybridization between J. curcas and J. integerrima. For analysis PCR-based dominant AFLP and codominant SSR markers were used. The multilocus outcrossing rate (tm) estimated from AFLP markers (0.892 ± 0.112) are almost in the same range with SSR (0.884 ± 0.293) markers which indicate a high level of heterozygosity. A low value of inbreeding coefficient (F) also points out to the fact that outcrossing was the prevalent mode of reproduction in Jatropha and suggests maintenance of adequate genetic variability within families.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12298-015-0318-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: AFLP, Backcross, Biodiesel, Jatropha, Outcrossing, SSR
Introduction
Jatropha curcas (family- Euphorbiaceae) has received great attention as a potential source of bio-diesel during the last decade. Several initiatives are in progress to develop improved varieties of Jatropha through breeding and selection. These breeding programs have been hindered due to a narrow genetic base in this species, especially among accessions from India, Southeast Asia and Africa (Basha et al. 2009; Pamidimarri and Reddy 2014).
The genetic structure of plant populations is determined by the prevalent mating system together with the mechanisms of pollen and seed dispersal (Charlesworth and Wright 2001). Few studies have been reported so far on mating system and outcrossing rates in Jatropha. Jatropha bears unisexual flowers in dichasial cymes where both male and female flowers are present in the same inflorescence (Raju and Ezradanam 2002). In addition, both, protandry and protogyny have been reported in Jatropha (Raju and Ezradanam 2002). Pollination is predominantly mediated by insects such as Apis dorsata and A. mellifera. So apriory, the floral system of J. curcas seems to favour outcrossing (Kaur et al.2011; Wang and Ding 2012). Recently, a mixed-mating reproductive system with up to 68.3 % outcrossing and 13 % apomixis has been reported in Jatropha (Bressan et al.2013).
Outcrossing rates have been traditionally studied using codominant markers such as isozymes and microsatellites due to their high allelic polymorphism (Adugna et al. 2013; Chaix et al. 2003). However, dominant markers such as RAPD and AFLP have also been used successfully especially when microsatellite markers were unavailable (Gaiotto et al. 1997). Due to low genetic diversity in Jatropha, detection of outcrossing events may be difficult which may in turn lead to underestimation of outcrossing rates. In this study, we studied the outcrossing rates in an inherently diverse set of individuals using AFLP and microsatellite loci. We also compared the efficacy of the two marker systems for the estimation of outcrossing rates.
Materials and methods
Plant material
The research material used in this study included 40 open pollinated progenies derived from 4 mother plants (Table 1). The mother plants belonged to a BC1 mapping population obtained through interspecific hybridization between J. curcas and J. integerrima (Sinha et al. 2015a). The BC1 plants had been planted in a block (2 m × 3 m spacing) which was surrounded by a large number of J. curcas accessions. All individual plants of BC1 block and surrounding blocks were in bearing stage at the time of collection of seeds.
Table 1.
List of backcross plants used for estimation of outcrossing rates in Jatropha
| S. No. | Mother plants (BC1) | No. of progeny |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BC1-10 | 10 |
| 2 | BC1-11 | 10 |
| 3 | BC1-21 | 10 |
| 4 | BC1-28 | 10 |
| Total | 4 | 40 |
AFLP and microsatellite genotyping
DNA was isolated from young leaves following a modified CTAB based procedure (Singh et al.1999). AFLP genotyping was done using the protocol described by Vos et al. (1995). The EcoRI primers were end labeled using [γ-32P] ATP. A total of 4 AFLP primer combinations were used (Table S1). The AFLP fragments were resolved on 6 % polyacrylamide gels and detected by autoradiography. Microsatellite genotyping was done with 8 microsatellite markers (Table S2) as per Sinha et al. (2015b).
Data analysis
AFLP bands were scored manually for their presence or absence. The amplicons were in the size range of 50–500 bp. SSR bands were scored for different allelic states in codominant fashion. The program MLTR (version 3.4) was used to calculate the multilocus outcrossing rate (tm), the single locus outcrossing rate (ts), the apparent level of selfing due to biparental inbreeding (tm – ts), the correlation of selfing among maternal plants (rs) and the multilocus correlated paternity (rp) using mixed-mating model with 1000 bootstraps (Ritland 2002). The inbreeding coefficient at equilibrium (Feq) was calculated as Feq = , where tm is the multilocus outcrossing rate (Fyfe and Bailey 1951).
Results
With 109 polymorphic AFLP markers, none of the progenies were found to be identical to their seed parents (Fig. 1). On the other hand, 52 % of the progenies were identical to their seed parents for all the eight SSR loci (Fig. 2). This indicated that the AFLP markers had higher discriminating power than the SSR markers. The multilocus outcrossing rate (tm) estimated using AFLP markers was 0.892 ± 0.112 whereas that estimated from SSR data (8 SSRs) was 0.884± 0.293. The mean single locus outcrossing rates (ts) were significantly different than tm in case of AFLP markers but not in case of SSR markers.
Fig. 1.
AFLP profile showing outcrossing rates in 4 mother plants with their respective progenies using primer combination E-AGxM-CTA
Fig. 2.
SSR profile showing outcrossing rates in 4 mother plants with their respective progenies using microsatellite primer JcSSR 2742
The estimated fixation index (F) was −0.023 and −0.2 for AFLP and SSR markers, respectively. On the other hand, the expected F values were 0.057 and 0.061 for AFLP and SSR respectively.
The multilocus correlation of paternity with AFLP markers was 0.142 which indicated involvement of several pollen parents. The correlation of selfing among loci was 0.999 and 0.285 with AFLP and SSR markers respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
Mixed mating parameters obtained from MLTR software version 3.4 using AFLP markers, SD = standard deviation, rp = correlation of paternity
| Parameters | AFLP | SSR | AFLP + SSR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multilocus t estimate (tm) with SD | 0.892 (0.112) | 0.884 (0.293) | 0.977 (0.113) |
| Singlelocus t estimate (ts) with SD | 0.784 (0.122) | 0.881 (0.292) | 0.809 (0.109) |
| Biparental inbreeding (tm-ts) with SD | 0.108 (0.067) | 0.003 (0.033) | 0.168 (0.097) |
| Correlation of t (or s) estimate | 0.056 (0.485) | 0.999 (0.847) | −0.999 (0.102) |
| Multilocus correlation of p estimate rp(m) | 0.142 (0.387) | 0.016 (0.325) | 0.188 (0.387) |
| Singlelocus correlation of p estimate rp(s) | 0.143 (0.115) | 0.021 (0.329) | 0.335 (0.280) |
| Difference [rp(s)-rp(m)]of p estimate | 0.001 (0.356) | 0.005 (0.112) | 0.147 (0.345) |
| Correlation of s (or t) among loci | 0.999 (0.635) | 0.285 (0.737) | 0.999 (0.696) |
| Festimated | −0.023 (0.136) | −0.200 (0.171) | −0.030 (0.147) |
| Fexpected | 0.057 | 0.061 | 0.011 |
Discussion
Occurrence of apomixis was ruled out in the present study as none of the progenies were genetically identical to their respective seed parent. However, with SSR markers, an average of 52 % progeny individuals had multilocus genotypes identical to their respective parents. In the absence of any additional data, this could have been attributed to apomixis, at least in part. Thus, the AFLP markers displayed greater efficacy than SSR markers in the current study. The difference in inferences from AFLP and SSR data is mainly due to the remarkable difference in the number of informative markers in the two datasets. It may be noted that in the current case, the SSR markers had limited advantage over AFLP markers per locus basis as only two alleles for each SSR (one from J. curcas and the other from J. integerrima) were expected in the plants of the entire experimental plot.
Apomictic fruit set and seed production has been reported in J. curcas in artificial pollination experiments under field conditions by protecting female flowers. Apomixis rates of 32 to 36 % have been reported from field grown Jatropha in India (Bhattacharya et al. 2005) and China (Chang-Wei et al. 2007). However, a much lower level of apomixis (13 %) was inferred from frequency of progeny with identical multilocus genotype to the mother tree (Bressan et al. 2013).
In the current study, Jatropha displayed a mixed mating system (AFLP, tm = 0.892; SSR, tm = 0.884), producing both outcrossed and selfed seeds (Table 2). Indeed, the tm obtained using combined data (AFLP and SSR) was 0.977. The results are in correspondence with the general expectations considering the floral biology and previous reports in Jatropha (Bhattacharya et al. 2005; Raju and Ezradanam 2002). A mixed mating system has been observed in Jatropha (Bressan et al. 2013). In this study, the multilocus outcrossing rates (tm) ranged from 0.21 to 1.0 with a mean tm of 0.683. On the other hand, the level of biparental inbreeding, which is indicative of mating among related individuals, in the current study was lesser (0.168) than the previous study (0.347). These differences in multilocus outcrossing rate and the level of biparental inbreeding in two studies may be attributed to greater efficiency of detecting outcrossing events in the current study due to inherent diverse nature of the research material. A low correlation of paternity may be due to high level of diversity among the BC1 individuals. A low value of inbreeding coefficient (F) also points out to the fact the outcrossing was the prevalent mode of reproduction in these plants.
An important feature of the current dataset is that the mother plants were highly suitable for study of outcrossing rates. It was expected that a significant marker loci in the mother plants will be in heterozygous state as they belonged to first backcross generation. Therefore, discrimination between selfing and apomixis as well as identification of outcrossing events would be easier. As almost all the allelic polymorphism in these samples was due to their interspecific origin, no ambiguity in scoring was encountered.
In general, populations with high outcrossing rates exhibit higher genetic variability in comparison to inbreeding populations (Charlesworth and Wright 2001). This condition is inconsistent in case of Jatropha where genetic variability is low despite high outcrossing rates. This may be due to founder effect which occurs due to introduction of a population of highly related individuals (Sinha et al. 2013; Wright 1931).
Availability of complete genome sequence of Jatropha has now made it possible to use next generation sequencing and other high throughput genotyping methods for genetic studies (Wu et al. 2015). However, these tools are still not cost-effective at per sample basis. On the other hand, per sample costs are much lower with AFLP and microsatellites which can generate adequate number of markers within short time.
The high outcrossing rates observed in Jatropha in this study as well as by others shows that seed orchards containing diverse accessions of Jatropha can be used for large scale seed production without any significant risk of selfing and consequent inbreeding depression. This would reduce the cost of planting material as compared to vegetative propagation. Use of seed raised plants would also increase the rate of stand establishment and reduce the mortality from color rot and water logging.
Conclusions
This is the first study employing AFLP markers as well as backcross populations for estimation of outcrossing rates in Jatropha. Our data indicates that Jatropha is a predominately outcrossed species (97.7 %) with very low level of true selfing. Further, no evidence of occurrence of apomixis could be obtained unlike the previous studies.
Electronic supplementary material
(DOCX 17 kb)
(DOCX 19 kb)
Acknowledgments
This work was graciously funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. The authors are thankful to Dr. RK Pachauri, Director General, TERI, for providing the necessary infrastructure facilities for this study.
References
- Adugna A, Sweeney PM, Bekele E. Estimation of in situ mating systems in wild sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench) in Ethiopia using SSR-based progeny array data: implications for the spread of crop genes into the wild. J Genet. 2013;92:3–10. doi: 10.1007/s12041-013-0214-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basha SD, George F, Makkar HPS, Becker K, Sujatha M. A comparative study of biochemical traits and molecular markers for assessment of genetic relationships between Jatropha curcas (L.) germplasm from different countries. Plant Sci. 2009;176:812–823. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharya A, Datta K, Datta SK. Floral biology, floral resource constraints and pollination limitation in Jatropha curcas L. Pak J Biol Sci. 2005;8(3):456–460. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2005.456.460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bressan EA, Sebbenn AM, Ferreira RR, Lee TSG, Figueira A. Jatropha curcas L. (euphorbiaceae) exhibits a mixed mating system, high correlated mating and apomixis. Tree Genet Genomics. 2013;9:1089–1097. doi: 10.1007/s11295-013-0623-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chaix G, Gerber S, Razafimaharo V, Vigneron P, Verhaegen D, Hamon S. Gene flow estimation with microsatellites in a Malagasy seed orchard of Eucalyptus grandis. Theor Appl Genet. 2003;107:705–712. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1294-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang-Wei L, Kun L, You C, Young-Yu S. Floral display and breeding system of Jatropha curcas L. For Stud China. 2007;10:114–119. [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth D, Wright SI. Breeding systems and genome evolution. Curr Op Genet Dev. 2001;11(6):685–690. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00254-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fyfe JL, Bailey NTJ. Plant breeding studies in leguminous forage crops. 1. Natural cross breeding in winter beans. J Agri Sci. 1951;41:371–378. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600049558. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gaiotto FA, Bramucci M, Grattapaglia D. Estimation of outcrossing rate in a breeding population of Eucalyptus urophylla with dominant RAPD and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;95(5):842–849. doi: 10.1007/s001220050634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaur K, Dhillon GPS, Gill RIS. Floral biology and breeding system of Jatropha curcas in north-western India. J Trop For Sci. 2011;23:4–9. [Google Scholar]
- Pamidimarri DVNS, Reddy MP. Phylogeography and molecular diversity analysis of Jatropha curcas L. and the dispersal route revealed by RAPD, AFLP and nrDNA-ITS analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:3225–3234. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3185-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raju AJS, Ezradanam V. Pollination ecology and fruiting behaviour in a monoecious species, Jatropha curcas L. (euphorbiaceae) Curr Sci. 2002;83:1395–1398. [Google Scholar]
- Ritland K. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity. 2002;88:221–228. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A, Negi MS, Rajagopal J, Bhatia S, Tomar UK, Srivastava PS, Lakshmikumaran M. Assessment of genetic diversity in Azadirachta indica using AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;99(1):272–279. doi: 10.1007/s001220051232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sinha P, Negi MS, Sharma SS, Md Islam A, Tripathi SB. Analysis of genome-wide homozygosity in Jatropha curcas accessions using AFLP markers. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2013;3:191–201. [Google Scholar]
- Sinha P, Md Islam A, Negi MS, Tripathi SB (2015a) Analysis of genetic diversity and fatty acid composition in a prebreeding material of Jatropha. J Plant Biochem Biotech:doi: 10.1007/s13562-13015-10301-13562. doi: 10.1007/s13562-015–0301–2
- Sinha P, Md Islam A, Negi MS, Tripathi SB (2015b) Development of novel microsatellite markers in Jatropha curcas and evaluation of their cross-species transferability. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Biol Sci:doi: 10.1007/s40011-40015-40489-x. doi: 10.1007/s40011-015–0489-x
- Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Friters A, Pot J, Paleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res. 1995;23(21):4407–4414. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang XR, Ding GJ. Reproductive biology characteristic of Jatropha curcas (euphorbiaceae) Rev Biol Trop. 2012;60(4):1525–1533. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v60i4.2070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 1931;16:97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu P, Zhou C, Cheng S, Wu Z, Lu W, Han J, Chen Y, Chen Y, Ni P, Wang Y, Xu X, Huang Y, Song C, Wang Z, Shi N, Zhang X, Fang X, Yang Q, Jiang H, Chen Y, Li M, Chen F, Wang J, Wu G. Integrated genome sequence and linkage map of physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.), a biodiesel plant. The Plant Journal. 2015;81(5):810–821. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX 17 kb)
(DOCX 19 kb)


