Skip to main content
PMC home page
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences logoLink to Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
. 2015 Dec;28(12):1742–1750. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0131

Branched-chain Amino Acids are Beneficial to Maintain Growth Performance and Intestinal Immune-related Function in Weaned Piglets Fed Protein Restricted Diet

M Ren 1,2, S H Zhang 1, X F Zeng 1, H Liu 1, S Y Qiao 1,*
PMCID: PMC4647083  PMID: 26580442

Abstract

As a novel approach for disease control and prevention, nutritional modulation of the intestinal health has been proved. However, It is still unknown whether branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) is needed to maintain intestinal immune-related function. The objective of this study was to determine whether BCAA supplementation in protein restricted diet affects growth performance, intestinal barrier function and modulates post-weaning gut disorders. One hundred and eight weaned piglets (7.96±0.26 kg) were randomly fed one of the three diets including a control diet (21% crude protein [CP], CON), a protein restricted diet (17% CP, PR) and a BCAA diet (BCAA supplementation in the PR diet) for 14 d. The growth performance, plasma amino acid concentrations, small intestinal morphology and intestinal immunoglobulins were tested. First, average daily gain (ADG) (p<0.05) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) (p<0.05) of weaned pigs in PR group were lower, while gain:feed ratio was lower than the CON group (p<0.05). Compared with PR group, BCAA group improved ADG (p<0.05), ADFI (p<0.05) and feed:gain ratio (p<0.05) of piglets. The growth performance data between CON and BCAA groups was not different (p>0.05). The PR and BCAA treatments had a higher (p<0.05) plasma concentration of methionine and threonine than the CON treatment. The level of some essential and functional amino acids (such as arginine, phenylalanine, histidine, glutamine etc.) in plasma of the PR group was lower (p<0.05) than that of the CON group. Compared with CON group, BCAA supplementation significantly increased BCAA concentrations (p<0.01) and decreased urea concentration (p<0.01) in pig plasma indicating that the efficiency of dietary nitrogen utilization was increased. Compared with CON group, the small intestine of piglets fed PR diet showed villous atrophy, increasing of intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IELs) number (p<0.05) and declining of the immunoglobulin concentration, including jejunal immunoglobulin A (IgA) (p = 0.04), secreted IgA (sIgA) (p = 0.03) and immunoglobulin M (p = 0.08), and ileal IgA (p = 0.01) and immunoglobulin G (p = 0.08). The BCAA supplementation increased villous height in the duodenum (p<0.01), reversed the trend of an increasing IELs number. Notably, BCAA supplementation increased levels of jejunal and ileal immunoglobulin mentioned above. In conclusion, BCAA supplementation to protein restricted diet improved intestinal immune defense function by protecting villous morphology and by increasing levels of intestinal immunoglobulins in weaned piglets. Our finding has the important implication that BCAA may be used to reduce the negative effects of a protein restricted diet on growth performance and intestinal immunity in weaned piglets.

Keywords: Weaned Pig, Growth Performance, Immunity, Small Intestine, Morphology, Immunoglobulin

INTRODUCTION

As a component of innate immune system, the intestinal barrier is the first defense line against noxious pathogens and antigens during weaning stress and it directly affects body health (Wells et al., 2010). The intestinal barrier composes of a thick secreted mucus layer, a layer of epithelial cells and the underlying non-epithelial mucosal cells, mainly leukocytes (McGuckin et al., 2009). Meanwhile, immunoglobulins, host defense peptides and cytokines are produced by intestinal cells to participate the intestinal mucosal immune system (Pié et al., 2004; Nofrarías et al., 2006; Pomorska-Mól and Markowska-Daniel, 2011). Intestinal mucosal integrity (assessed by intestinal morphology) and immunoglobulins are commonly used to evaluate function of the intestinal immunity (Mao et al., 2011). In weaned piglets, the intestinal immune system is easily disturbed because of immature immunity and enteric antigenic challenges (McCracken et al., 1995) which trigger mucosal and systemic inflammatory responses (Wang et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2010). Thus diarrhea, growth stasis and post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome commonly occur immediately after weaning (Wang et al., 2008). The economic impact of those diseases is huge because of the considerable losses due to mortality or production of non-marketable pigs (Rose, 2003).

During the repairing period after weaning, the most important thing is to decrease the stress and the irritation of antigens from feed and to strengthen the intestinal innate immunity, and the main strategies to improve the intestinal immune-related function are the production of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) (Santaolalla et al., 2011). Supplementing free amino acids (FAA) in low crude protein (CP) diet, as one nutritional strategy (Lallès et al., 2007), have been demonstrated to keep post-weaning gut disorder under control (Htoo et al., 2007; Yue and Qiao, 2007; Heo et al., 2008). For decades, dietary supplementation with amino acids (AA) has been proposed in various physiological or pathological conditions. There has been great interest in the effects of AA on intestinal immune-related function. Several studies were focused on the effects of glutamine (Calder and Yaqoob, 1999; Carr et al., 2010), arginine (Evoy et al., 1998; Tan et al., 2009; Yoneda et al., 2009) and threonine (Mao et al., 2011) as the fuel and protein (such as mucin) synthesis function, where little is known about the impact of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) on the intestinal innate immunity. Cell culture and animal feeding trials indicated that the deficiency of BCAA affected the efficiency of immune function because of the inability of protein synthesis (Con et al., 2011; Powell et al., 2012; Simone et al., 2013). Therefore, the objective of the current study is to determine whether BCAA supplementation in a protein restricted diet improves the intestinal immune barrier function and intestinal health in weaning piglets.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Animals

The experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of China Agricultural University, with the protocol for animal use approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of China Agricultural University. A total of 108 crossbred (Landrace×Yorkshire×Duroc) piglets (7.96±0.26 kg) weaned at 28±1 d of age were grouped on the basis of body weight (BW) and sex and then allocated to 18 pens for feeding three different diets, with 6 pigs in each pen (all barrow or all gilt) (1.8×2.1 m2). All piglets had ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the 14 d experimental period. The average temperature in the stable during the experiment was 26°C.

Experimental design

The experiment was conducted as a randomized complete block design and the sex was considered as random effect. The single-factor arrangement was designed with three dietary treatments. The control treatment (CON) was the base corn-soybean meal diet and had the general protein level (21% CP). The protein restricted treatment (PR) had lower content of protein (17% CP) and four essential AA (lysine, methionine, threonine and tryptophan) were supplemented in it to the National Research Council (NRC) requirements (NRC, 1998). The BCAA diet was supplementation with BCAAs in PR diet according the NRC requirement (NRC, 1998). All pigs were weighed at the beginning and end of the experiment. Feed added to the feeder and any wasted feed were weighed. These data was used to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and gain:feed ratio (G:F).

Chemical analysis

The ingredient composition and chemical analysis of the diets were presented in Table 1 and 2. Experimental diets were analyzed in triplicate for dry matter (method 930.15; AOAC, 2007), CP (method 990. 03; AOAC, 2007), ash (method 942. 05; AOAC, 2007), calcium, and phosphorus (method 985.01; AOAC, 2007). Amino acid composition of feed samples was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after acid hydrolysis. The methionine and cystine were determined following oxidation with performic acid (Moore, 1963).

Table 1.

Composition of experimental diets (% as-fed basis)

Ingredients CON2 PR BCAA
 Corn (8.7% CP) 55.14 65.71 64.90
 Dehulled soybean meal (47.9% CP) 19.70 8.00 8.00
 Soy protein concentrate (65%) 5.00 5.00 5.00
 Fish meal (64.5% CP) 4.00 4.00 4.00
 Whey powder (3% CP) 10.00 10.00 10.00
 Soybean oil 2.10 2.30 2.60
 Salt 0.34 0.35 0.35
 Limestone 0.55 0.43 0.43
 Dicalcium phosphate, CaHPO4 1.30 1.50 1.50
 Zinc oxide, ZnO 0.30 0.30 0.30
 Vitamin-mineral premix1 1.00 1.00 1.00
 L-lysine·HCl 0.35 0.77 0.76
 L-threonine 0.09 0.30 0.29
 L-tryptophan 0.04 0.11 0.11
 DL-methionine 0.09 0.23 0.23
 L-isoleucine 0.19
 L-valine 0.27
 L-leucine 0.07
 Total 100 100 100
Open in a new tab

CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet; CP, crude protein.

1

Provided per kilogram of complete diet: 8,500 IU of vitamin A; 1,100 IU of vitamin D3; 11.0 IU of vitamin E; 1.1 mg of vitamin K; 37.0 mg of niacin; 800 mg of choline chloride; 0.25 mg of biotin; 0.12 mg of vitamin B12; 0.75 mg of folic acid; 45 mg of Mn;105 mg of Zn;100 mg of Fe; 20 mg of Cu; 0.30 mg of Se; 0.10 mg of I.

Table 2.

Analyzed chemical composition and amino acid content of experimental diets1

Content CON2 PR BCAA
 Crude protein (%) 20.90 17.06 17.85
 Dry matter (%) 89.54 89.14 89.08
 Moisture (%) 10.46 10.86 10.92
 Ash (%) 6.38 5.47 5.66
 Calcium (%) 0.88 0.85 0.85
 Total phosphorus (%) 0.65 0.61 0.60
 Metabolic energy (ME), Kcal/kg2 3,280 3,280 3,280
Essential amino acid (%)
 Lysine 1.45 1.45 1.50
 Threonine 0.94 0.90 0.89
 Tryptophan 0.27 0.28 0.29
 Methionine 0.62 0.53 0.55
 Valine 0.97 0.74 1.11
 Isoleucine 0.84 0.60 0.80
 Leucine 1.61 1.26 1.38
 Phenylalanine 0.95 0.69 0.72
 Histidine 0.59 0.45 0.45
 Arginine 1.24 0.83 0.87
Non-essential amino acid (%)
 Cystine 0.47 0.37 0.36
 Tyrosine 0.48 0.34 0.37
 Glycine 0.85 0.64 0.65
 Proline 1.05 0.84 0.85
 Methionine+cystine 1.09 0.77 0.91
 Alanine 1.05 0.86 0.86
 Serine 0.90 0.64 0.65
 Glutamate 3.53 2.56 2.62
 Aspartate 1.99 1.35 1.41
Open in a new tab

CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet.

1

Values are adjusted to a dry matter content of 87.5%.

2

The metabolic energy of diets is calculated.

Sample preparation

At the 14th day of the trial (early morning at 15th, before pigs were fed), blood was collected from one pig (its BW close to the mean of BW in each pen) from each pen (six pigs per treatment [half barrow and half gilt]) via the anterior vena cava puncture using ethylene diamine tetraacetie acid-containing tubes for plasma AA analysis. And then the pig which blood was collected underwent electrical shock euthanasia. Two segments of 5 to 8 cm section of the middle of the duodenum, the jejunum and the ileum were first rinsed with ice-cold normal saline solution (0.9% w/v). One was placed into 4% paraformaldehyde solution and the other was stored at −80°C until assay.

Plasma free amino acids

After collection, the blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rotations per minute at 4°C for 15 min and the plasma samples were allocated and stored at −80°C until assay. Plasma FAA were determined by HPLC with precolumn 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate derivatization. Plasma was neutralized with 10% 2-hydroxybenzoic-5-sulfonic acid, blending. And the solution was centrifuged at 50,000 rotations per minute at 4°C for 15 min and the supernatant fluid was used to analyze the FAA (Sykam S433 AA analyzer, Munich, Germany).

Intestinal histology and the number of lymph cells

The preserved segments were treated using standard paraffin-embedding techniques. The intestinal samples were gradually dehydrated, sectioned at 5 μm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. The intestinal morphology was tested according to Pluske et al. (1996). The villous height and crypt depth were taken based on 15 apparently intact villi from each section on the stained sections (10×objective) and the results were shown as mean villous height or crypt depth in μm. Villous height was measured from the cypth-villous junction to the tip. Crypt depth was measured from the crypt-villous junction to the base. The number of goblet cells and intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IELs) among 100 enterocytes in 15 different intestinal villi of each tissue was counted on the stained sections (40×objective) for the statistical analysis of the data. The targets were measured using the light microscope (BX51; Olympus, Osaka, Japan) fitted with an image analyser (Image-Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics, Sliver Spring, MD, USA).

Intestinal immunoglobulins

The levels of sIgA (lower limit 0.15 μg/mL), immunoglobulin A (IgA) (lower limit 0.146 μg/mL), immunoglobulin M (IgM) (lower limit 0.04 μg/mL) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) (lower limit 0.58 μg/mL) from small intestine were determined as described previously (Zhang et al., 2013) using commercially available sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Cusabio). Jejunum and ileum tissue were isolated and mixed in 5 mL phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 0.01 M) supplemented with 1% protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich Company, Louis, MO, USA). Homogenized samples were ultracentrifuged for 10 min at 5,000 rotations per minute and the immunoglobulin and total protein in the supernatant were measured by using kits. Add 50 μL standard or sample and 50 μL horseradish peroxidase-conjugate to a blank well. Mix well with the pipette or shake the plate. Then incubate for 40 min at 37°C. Aspirate each well and wash. Then all 90 μL 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl-benzidine substrate to each well and incubate for 20 min at 37°C. Add stop solution and read the plate using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The total protein concentration of each sample solution was determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) kit (test range 20 to 2,000 μg/mL) according to the supplier’s instructions. And the immunoglobulin data was collected as the immunoglobulin level to total protein concentration ratio of each pig sample.

Statistical analysis

The pen was used as the experimental unit for the analysis of growth performance, whereas individual piglet was used as experimental unit for analysis of other indexes. The data of growth performance and plasma AA concentration were analyzed by using general linear model procedure of SAS (Version 8.1; SAS Institute, Gary, NC, USA). The repeated measurements data on intestinal morphology, cell numbers, immunoglobulins across different locations of the small intestine were analyzed with repeat measure analysis. Differences among treatments were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple rang test. Probability values less than 0.05 were considered significance. Probability values between 0.1 to 0.05 were considered tendency.

RESULTS

Growth performance and concentrations of plasma free amino acid

In results, final BW, ADG, ADFI, and G:F were greater (p<0.05) in pigs fed the CON and BCAA diets than pigs fed the PR diet (Table 3). In Table 4, the plasma urea concentration of pigs was declined (p<0.05) in the BCAA group than CON and PR groups (the plasma urea concentration of BCAA group was lowered 71.8% than that of the CON group, and lowered 44.4% than that of the PR group). The pigs fed the PR and BCAA diets had a higher plasma concentration of methionine and threonine than pigs fed the CON diet. Following the reduced protein content in diet, the level of some essential and functional AA (arginine, phenylalanine, histidine, isoleucine, valine, and leucine) in plasma of PR group was lower than that of the CON group (p<0.05). Compared to the PR group, the supplementation of BCAA increased plasma concentration of isoleucine, leucine and valine in the BCAA group (p<0.05). The level of valine in pigs fed BCAA diet was higher than pig fed the CON and PR diets (p<0.05).

Table 3.

Growth performance of weaned piglets in different diets

Item CON PR BACC SEM2 p value
Initial weight (kg) 8.03 7.92 7.92 0.26 0.99
Final weight (kg) 12.27a 10.36b 11.92a 0.41 <0.01
ADG (g/d) 303a 174b 286a 16.84 <0.01
ADFI (g/d) 366a 300b 383a 14.55 <0.01
Feed:gian (g/g) 1.21a 1.73b 1.34a 0.07 <0.01
Open in a new tab

CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet; SEM, standard error of the mean; ADG, average daily gain; ADFI, average daily feed intake.

Values are presented as mea, n = 6 pen per treatment. Different superscripts indicate significant difference (p<0.05).

Table 4.

Amino acid concentration in plasma of piglets with different diets (nmol/mL)

Amino acids CON PR BACC SEM p value
Lysine 651.17 715.60 774.47 57.28 0.78
Methionine 89.04a 151.21b 160.11b 13.04 0.04
Cysteine 9.24 4.95 7.70 0.83 0.56
Threonine 379.06a 517.30b 534.25b 36.84 0.03
Tryptophan 81.06 98.02 85.17 5.40 0.43
Isoleucine 173.81a 62.04b 194.10a 16.40 <0.01
Leucine 268.42a 153.45b 203.52ab 15.17 <0.01
Valine 163.95b 114.96c 367.09a 40.86 <0.01
Proline 357.57 290.82 277.09 27.95 0.48
Arginine 352.55a 119.34b 124.40b 32.79 <0.01
Glycine 1,396.84 1,492.36 1,216.40 99.19 0.64
Aspartate 228.52 185.15 159.42 25.06 0.39
Serine 303.38 288.65 250.06 28.12 0.75
Phenylalanine 114.84a 66.54b 68.72b 6.99 <0.01
Histidine 93.70a 40.45b 24.45b 7.53 <0.01
Alanine 1,038.81 1,327.71 1,239.62 121.03 0.85
Glutamine 768.73 999.69 1,096.05 110.07 0.15
Urea 348.14a 176.69b 98.22c 30.15 <0.01
Open in a new tab

CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Values are presented as mean, n = 6 pigs per treatment. Different superscripts indicate significant difference (p<0.05).

Intestinal morphology

No effect of the CON, PR, and BCAA diets on villous height, crypt depth, and the ratio of villous height and crypt depth was observed in either jejunum or ileum of piglets (p>0.05) (Figure 1). However, compared with CON treatment, a lower on the villous height (p = 0.003) and the villous height:crypt depth ratio (p = 0.009) was observed in the duodenum in PR treatment. Pigs offered the BCAA diet had an increased villous height in the duodenum compared with pigs offered the PR diets (p<0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The villous height (A), crypt depth (B) and villous height:crypt depth ratio (C) in small intestine of pigs offered three diets for 2 wk. From left to right, bars represent area of the intestine from duodenum to ileum. White bars, gray bars or black bars represent CON, PR, or BCAA treatment, respectively. Values are presented as mean±SEM, n = 6 pigs per treatment. The “a” and “b” indicates mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (p<0.05). CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Intestinal immunoglobulin and intra-epithelial lymphocytes

Pigs offered different diets had the same epithelial goblet cell number in whole intestine. The IELs number of PR group was observed more than that of CON and BCAA groups in the duodenum (p<0.01), the jejunum (p = 0.007) or the ileum (p = 0.07) (Figure 2). Compared with the CON and BCAA groups, a decline of sIgA (p = 0.03), IgA (p = 0.04) and IgM (p = 0.08) was noticed in the jejunum of the PR group (Table 5). The expression of IgA (p = 0.01) and IgG (p = 0.08) in ileum of the PR group was also lower than that of CON and BCAA groups.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The epithelial goblet cell number (A) and intra-epithelial lymphocyte (IELs) number (B) in small intestine of pigs offered three diets for 2 wk. From left to right, bars represent area of the intestine from duodenum to ileum. White bars, gray bars or black bars represent CON, PR, or BCAA treatment, respectively. Values are presented as mean±SEM, n = 6 pigs per treatment. The “a” and “b” indicates mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (p<0.05). CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Table 5.

The concentration of immunoglobulin in the small intestine of piglets with different diets

Content CON PR BACC SEM p value
Concentration/jejunal tissue (mg/g)
 sIgA 5.83a 4.86c 5.06b 0.19 0.03
 IgA 15.52a 13.10c 14.23b 0.46 0.04
 IgG 65.14 56.64 63.41 2.42 0.22
 IgM 13.05a 10.55b 11.91ab 0.47 0.08
Concentration/ileal tissue (mg/g)
 sIgA 5.86 4.40 5.55 0.35 0.15
 IgA 16.91a 11.86b 15.58a 0.96 0.01
 IgG 74.05a 51.26b 68.94ab 5.33 0.08
 IgM 15.56 12.70 14.48 0.90 0.31
Open in a new tab

CON, the corn-soybean based diet; PR, the protein restricted diet; BCAA, the BCAA supplementation in PR diet; SEM, standard error of the mean; sIgA, secretory immunoglobulin A; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M.

Values are presented as mean, n = 6 pigs per treatment. Different superscripts indicate significant difference (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

Weaning in pigs, associated with social, environmental and dietary stress, deteriorated the intestinal barrier and absorption function (McCracken et al., 1995). During the first two weeks of repairing period after weaning, the most important thing is to decrease the stress and the irritation of antigens from feed and provide nutrients which could be rapidly absorbed and utilized (Wijtten et al., 2011). The growth performance of weaned piglet directly reflects the health and recovery of intestine from weaning stress (Zijlstra et al., 1994). In the present study, the PR treatment had the lower ADG and ADFI indicated that supplementing four essential AA (lysing, methionine, threonine, and tryptophan) in low protein diet was insufficient to maintain growth of weaned pig. The reduced performance is mainly due to the deficient of protein and possibly indicates the dispensable AA are also very important for production. Nyachoti et al. (2006) got a similar result that compared with 23% CP, 21% CP, or 19% CP diet, weaned pigs offered the low CP diet (containing 17% CP and crystalline lysine, methionine, threonine, and tryptophan) had a significantly lower performance. We found that the supplementation of BCAA in PR diet improved all growth indexes. On the contrary, Heo et al. (2008) reported that the growth performance of pigs was not affected by dietary CP level when crystalline AA were applied. These discrepancies are due to differences in pig breed and weaning age, the duration of experiment, the ingredient of diet and the degree of dietary protein reduction.

As a physical barrier to absorb nutrients and against pathogens, the small intestine exerts its function based on the villous and crypt hyperplasia to expand the secondary mucosal surface area in preparation for the nutrient load during weaning (Cummins and Thompson, 2002). Villous height is halved 5 days after weaning and crypt depth is further increased by weaning while the changes in gut morphology are primarily related to inadequate nutrients caused by the low feed intake and intestinal inflammation during weaning (Miller et al., 1986; Nabuurs et al., 1993; Pluske et al., 1996). The reduction in dietary protein levels tended to decrease intestinal villous height and the ratio of villous height:crypt depth in weaning piglets (Guay et al., 2006), probably because of the severe lacking of nutrients, especially AA. Plasma concentration of AA is a dynamic process, which can be due to both of lower uptake of AA from PR diet and increased peripheral absorption of circulating AA. The methionine and threonine in plasma of pigs fed the PR and BCAA diet were higher than that of the CON group indicated that crystalline AA are absorbed easily and fast by intestine. Consistently, in this study, the plasma concentrations of many un-supplemented AA in the PR group, such as isoleucine, leucine, valine, arginine, phenylalanine, and histidine, were significantly lower than that in the control diet. The proper supplementation of BCAA possibly improved the intestinal morphology through the rapid absorption and utilization of crystalline AA (Stoll et al., 1998). In contrast with the control group, the BCAA group had a higher concentration of supplemented AA in plasma although plasma concentration of arginine, histidine, and phenylalanine in BCAA group was lower than the control group. BCAA supplementation might have beneficial for the utilization of dietary nitrogen and reduced nitrogen excretion (NRC, 2012). Plasma urea nitrogen is reduced linearly with the decrease in the protein content, while there was a positive correlation between the nitrogen excretion and plasma urea concentration (Figueroa et al., 2002; Kerr, 2003; Nyachoti et al., 2006; Lordelo et al., 2008). Our study found that the plasma urea concentration of pigs fed the PR diet was decreased by 49.2% than that of pigs fed the control diet. Supplementation of BCAA in the protein restricted diet decreased the plasma urea concentration of pigs by 71.8% or 44.4% compared with the CON group or the PR group, respectively. The results indicated that reducing dietary protein levels possibly decline nitrogen excretion in weaned pig, meanwhile BCAA supplementation can make it further declining through balancing the limitation of dietary AA.

Presently it has already become a consensus of modern nutrition and immunology that the layer of epithelial cells lining the small intestine not only digests and absorbs nutrients but also serves as a barrier against noxious antigens and pathogens in intestinal lumen (Oswald, 2006). The lymphocytes are recruited to the intestinal mucous, which induces an augment in IEL number during the post-weaning period and illustrates a post-weaning activation of the immune system (Nofrarías et al., 2006). Meanwhile, immunoglobulin, inflammatory cytokines (Pié et al., 2004), antimicrobial peptides and other immune-related proteins (Pomorska-Mól and Markowska-Daniel, 2011) are produced and secreted into gut lumen to protect and repair the intestinal mucosa of weaned piglets. Early intestinal immune response and gut disorders in post-weaning piglets can be influenced by dietary nutrients (Wu, 1998). In the current study, reducing dietary protein level significantly increased the number of IELs in the whole gut and declined the concentration of sIgA, IgA, and IgM in the jejunum or IgA and IgG the ileum of pigs fed the PR diet. A large number of lymphocytes in the villous epithelium, IELs, are a striking feature of the small intestinal mucosa. These cells consist of several ontogenically and phenotypically distinct populations of T cells (Guy-Grand, 1998) and they are one of the immune cells in intestinal epithelium that are involved in the development of tolerance and adaptive response to lumenal antigens while IELs perform surveillance of the epithelium (Lundqvist et al., 1995). In some conditions of excessive antigenic stimulation of the IEL might be responsible for the characteristic small bowel lesions of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia (Guy-Grand et al., 1998). Immunoglobulin especially sIgA translocate across the IEC layer toward the lumen and are deposited in the intestinal mucus layer to strengthen the first layer of defense against bacteria (Wells et al., 2010). The presence of high concentrations of sIgA in the mucus layer restricts commensal microbes from gaining entry to the lamina propria (Kinnebrew, 2012). We have proved that lacking of AA is adverse to the immune response including the raising of IELs number and the reducing of immunoglobulin. In current study, lacking of AA impaired the intestinal immune response including the raising of IELs number and the reducing of immunoglobulin. In post-weaning pig intestine, the nutritional requirement (especially AA and glucose) of intestinal epithelium is increased by elevated rates of substrate metabolism in IELs and synthesis of immune related protein (Dugan et al., 1994; Lallès et al., 2007). Supplementation of AA and easily absorbed protein, e.g. arginine (Zhu et al., 2013), glutamine (Doppenberg and van der Aar, 2010), BCAA (current study) and spray-dried plasma proteins (Doppenberg and van der Aar, 2010), prevented the elevation of IELs numbers and the declining of immunoglobulin. The results, that the BCAA supplementation diet decreased IEL number and significantly increased the immunoglobulins expression in the intestine of pigs, attested above point.

Epithelium absorbs a mass of AA from intestinal lumen to synthesize proteins related to immune and nutritional transport. Moreover AA can also provide energy to epithelium cells (Wu, 1998; Wu, 2009). The weaning stress and immune response intensifies the requirement of AA in gut of weaned pig (Li et al., 2007). Apart from reducing nitrogen excretion, supplementation of BCAA in protein restricted diet improves the gut health. The reasons might be that: firstly, stimulus from dietary antigens was lower in small intestine for declining of soybean anti-nutritional protein; secondly, BCAA have higher efficiency to absorption and utilization than whole compound protein; lastly, BCAA ameliorate mucus immune function and protect intestinal villi from negative effect of restricted protein diet. However, more research is needed about the mechanisms of BCAA on intestinal immune system. For example, whether (IELs) or goblet cells or other epithelial cells can utilize BCAA to apply energy and synthesize immune protein and cytokines. How could BCAA improve the expression of sIgA and intestinal host defense proteins?

In conclusion, the supplementation of BCAA was necessary in protein restricted diet to maintain growth performance and the gut health through improving immunity and synthesis of immunoglobulins in intestine. Our finding has an implication that BCAA may be used to reduce ameliorate growth stasis in weaned piglets.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We appreciate Global Bio-Chem Technology Inc. for the generous gift of the feed grade L-lysine sulfate that had been used in this study.

Supported by the National Basic Research Program (2012CB124704).

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. AOAC international; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Calder PC, Yaqoob P. Glutamine and the immune system. Amino Acids. 1999;17:227–241. doi: 10.1007/BF01366922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carr LE, Kelman A, Wu SG, Gopaul R, Senkevitch E, Aghvanyan A, Turay AM, Frauwirth KA. Glutamine uptake and metabolism are coordinately regulated by ERK/MAPK during T lymphocyte activation. J Immunol. 2010;185:1037–1044. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Con J, Joseph B, Kulvatunyou N, Tang A, O’Keeffe T, Wynne JL, Friese RS, Rhee P, Latifi R. Evidence-based immune-modulating nutritional therapy in critically ill and injured patients. Eur Surg. 2011;43:13–18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummins AG, Thompson FM. Effect of breast milk and weaning on epithelial growth of the small intestine in human. Gut. 2002;51:748–754. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.5.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doppenberg J, van der Aar PJ. Dynamics in Animal Nutrition. Wageingen Accademic Publishers; Wageingen, The Netherlands: 2010. pp. 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dugan MER, Knabe DA, Wu G. Glutamine and glucose metabolism in intraepithelial lymphocytes from pre- and post-weaning pigs. Comp Biochem Phys B Comp Biochem. 1994;109:675–681. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(94)90130-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evoy D, Lieberman MD, Fahey TJ, Daly JM. Immuninutrition: The role of arginine. Nutrition. 1998;14:611–617. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Figueroa JL, Lewis AJ, Miller PS, Fischer RL, Gómez RS, Diedrichsen RM. Nitrogen metabolism and growth performance of gilts fed standard maize-soybean meal diets or low-crude protein, amino acid supplemented diets. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:2911–2919. doi: 10.2527/2002.80112911x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guay F, Donovan SM, Trottier NL. Biochemical and morphological developments are practically impaired in intestinal mucosa from growing pigs fed reduced-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:1749–1760. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guy-Grand D, DiSanto JP, Henchoz P, Malassis-Séris M, Vassalli P. Small bowel enteropathy: role of interepithelial lymphocytes and of cytokines (IL-12, INF-γ, TNF) in the induction of epithelial cell death and renewal. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:730–744. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199802)28:02<730::AID-IMMU730>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heo JM, Kim JC, Hansen CF, Mullan BP, Hanpson DJ, Pluske JR. Effects of feeding low protein diets to piglets on plasma urea nitrogen, faecal ammonia nitrogen, the incidence of diarrhoea and performance after weaning. Arch Anim Nutr. 2008;62:343–358. doi: 10.1080/17450390802327811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Htoo JK, Araiza BA, Sauer WC, Rademacher M, Zhang Y, Cervantes M, Aijlstra RT. Effect of dietary protein content on ileal amino acid digestibility, growth performance, and formation of microbial metabolites in ileal and cecal digest of early-weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:3303–3312. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerr BJ. Dietary manipulation to reduce environmental impact. 9th International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs; May 14–17, 2003; Banff, Alberta, Canada. 2003. pp. 139–158. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kinnebrew MA, Pamer EG. Innate immune signaling in defense against intestinal microbes. Immunol Rev. 2012;245:113–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01081.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lallès JP, Bosi P, Smidt H, Stokes CR. Nutritional management of gut health in pigs around weaning. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007;66:260–268. doi: 10.1017/S0029665107005484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li P, Yin Y, Li D, Kim SW, Wu G. Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr. 2007;98:237–252. doi: 10.1017/S000711450769936X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lordelo MM, Gaspar AM, Le Bellego L, Freire JPB. Isoleucine and valine supplementation of a low-protein corn-wheat-soybean meal-based diet for piglets: growth performance and nitrogen balance. J Anim Sci. 2008;86:2936–2941. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lundqvist C, Baranov V, Hammarstrōm S, Athlin L, Hammarstrōm ML. Intra-epithelial lymphocytes. Evidence for regional specialization and extrathymic T cell maturation in the human gut epithelium. Int Immunol. 1995;7:1473–1487. doi: 10.1093/intimm/7.9.1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mao X, Zeng X, Qiao S, Wu G, Li D. Specific roles of threonine in intestinal mucosal integrity and barrier function. Front Biosci. 2011;E3:1192–1200. doi: 10.2741/e322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCracken BA, Gaskins HR, Ruwe-Kaiser PJ, Klasing KC, Jewell DE. Diet-dependent and diet-independent metabolic responses underlie growth stasis of pigs at weaning. J Nutr. 1995;125:2838–2845. doi: 10.1093/jn/125.11.2838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McGuckin AM, Eri R, Simms LA, Florin THJ, Radford-Smith G. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:100–113. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller BG, Jamies PS, Smith MW, Bourne FJ. Effect of weaning on the capacity of pig intestinal villi to digest and absorb nutrients. J Agric Sci Camb. 1986;107:579–589. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moore S. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J Biol Chem. 1963;238:235–237. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nabuurs MJ, Hoogendoorn A, Molen EJV, Van Osta AL. Villous height and crypt depth in weaned and unweaned pigs, reared under various circumstances in the Netherlands. Res Vet Sci. 1993;55:78–84. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(93)90038-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th Edition. National Academy Press; Washington DC, USA: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  27. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th Edition. National Academy Press; Washington DC, USA: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nofrarías M, Manzanilla EG, Pujols J, Gibert X, Majó N, Segalés J, Gasa J. Effects of spray- dried porcine plasma and plant exreacts on intestinal morphology and on leukocyte cell subsets of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:2735–2742. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nyachoti CM, Omoghenigun FO, Rademacher M, Blank G. Performance responses and indicators of gastrointestinal health in early-weaned pigs fed low-protein amino acids-supplemented diets. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:125–134. doi: 10.2527/2006.841125x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oswald IP. Role of intestinal epithelial cells in the innate immune defence of the pig intestine. Vet Res. 2006;37:359–368. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wijtten JAP, van der Meulen J, Verstegen MWA. Intestinal barrier function and absorption in pigs after weaning: A review. Br J Nutr. 2011;105:967–981. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510005660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pié S, Lallè JP, Blazy F, Laffitte J, Sève B, Oswald IP. Weaning is associated with an upregulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine of piglets. J Nutr. 2004;124:641–647. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.3.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pluske JR, Thompson MJ, Atwood CS, Bird PH, Williams IH, Hartmann PE. Maintenance of villous height and crypt depth, and enhancement of disaccharide digestion and monosaccharide absorption, in piglets fed on cows’ whole milk after weaning. Br J Nutr. 1996;76:409–422. doi: 10.1079/bjn19960046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pomorska-Mól M, Markowska-Daniel I. Porcine cathelicidins and defensins. Med Weter. 2011;67:20–24. [Google Scholar]
  35. Powell DJ, Pollizzi KN, Heikamp EB, Horton MR. Regulation of immune responses by mTOR. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:39–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-075024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rose N, Larour G, Le Digyerher G, Everno E, Jolly JP, Blanchard P, Oger A, Le Dimna M, Jestin A, Madec F. Risk factors for porcine post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) in 149 French farrow-to-finish herds. Prev Vet Med. 2003;61:209–225. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Santaolalla R, Fukata M, Abreu MT. Innate immunity in the small intestine. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27:125–131. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283438dea. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Simone DR, Vissicchio F, Mingarelli C, Nuccio CD, Visentin S, Ajmone-Cat MA, Minghetti L. Branched-chain amino acids influence the immune properties of microglial cells and their responsiveness to pro-inflammatory signals. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 20131832:650–659. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith F, Clark JE, Overman BL, Tozel CC, Huang JH, Rivier JEF, Blisklager AT, Moeser AJ. Early weaning stress impairs development of mucosal barrier function in the porcine intestine. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;298:352–363. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00081.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Stoll B, Henry J, Reeds PJ, Yu H, Jahoor F, Burrin DG. Catabolism dominates the first-pass intestinal metabolism of dietary essential amino acids in milk protein-fed piglets. J Nutr. 1998;128:606–614. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.3.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tan B, Li XG, Kong X, Huang R, Ruan Z, Yao K, Deng Z, Xie M, Shinzato I, Yin Y, Wu G. Dietary L-arginine supplementation enhances the immune status in early-weaned pglets. Amino Acids. 2009;37:323–331. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0155-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang JJ, Chen L, Li P, Li X, Zhou H, Wang F, Li D, Yin Y, Wu G. Gene expression is altered in piglet small intestine by weaning and dietary glutamine supplementation. J Nutr. 2008;138:1025–1032. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.6.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wells JM, Loonen LMP, Karczewski JM. The role of innate signalling in the homeostasis of tolerance and immunity in the intestine. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu G. Intestinal mucosal amino acid catabolism. J Nutr. 1998;128:1249–1252. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.8.1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu G. Amino acids: Metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids. 2009;37:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0269-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yoneda J, Andou A, Takehana K. Regulatory roles of amino acids in immune response. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2009;5:252–258. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yue LY, Qiao SY. Effects of low-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids on performance and intestinal development in piglets over the first 2 weeks after weaning. Livest Sci. 2007;115:144–152. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang F, Zeng X, Yang F, Huang Z, Liu H, Ma X, Qiao S. Dietary N-carbamylglutamate supplementation boosts intestinal mucosal immunity in Escherichia coli challenged piglets. Plos One. 2013;8(6):e66280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhu HL, Liu YL, Xie XL, Huang JJ, Hou YQ. Effect of L-arginine on intestinal mucosal immune barrier function in weaned pigs after Escherichia coli LPS challenge. Innate Immun. 2013;19:242–252. doi: 10.1177/1753425912456223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zijlstra RT, Odle J, Hall WF, Petschow BW, Gelbery HB, Litov RE. Effect of orally administered epidermal growth factor on intestinal recovery of neonatal pigs infected with rotavirus. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;19:382–390. doi: 10.1097/00005176-199411000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences are provided here courtesy of Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP)

RESOURCES