Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
letter
. 2014 Nov 20;112(11):1840. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.583

Comment on ‘Possible pro-carcinogenic association of endotoxin on lung cancer among Shanghai women textile workers'

R Rylander 1,*, R Jacobs 2
PMCID: PMC4647236  PMID: 25412234

Sir,

In a recent article in this Journal, Checkoway et al (2014) suggest that the exposure to endotoxin in industrial environments is associated with an increase in the risk of lung cancer.

A number of studies over the past 50 years has demonstrated a decreased risk in different environments involving a high exposure to endotoxin such as cotton handling and farming (Rylander, 1992; Maestrangelo et al, 2005; Lenters et al, 2010). Plausible cellular mechanisms for this defence have been discussed. In the data now presented there are no significant differences in risk—all are within the 95% confidence limit—and no significance for trend in relation to exposure duration. The only observation, thoroughly discussed, is a small, non-significant increase in risk in a subgroup. It is difficult to understand how such data can be used as a support to challenge a previously well-established relationship.

More serious is the lack of control of possible confounding factors. It is well known that indoor air pollution from cooking fuels is a risk factor for lung cancer. Such exposures change over the years and are closely related to socio-economic factors. The problem is discussed but in the absence of data the discussion remains speculative. Diet modulates the risk of lung cancer but is not discussed (Seow et al, 2002; Rylander and Axelsson, 2006). Finally, possible changes in endotoxin exposure over the years are not dealt with. Also in China, work hygiene standards have improved over the years since the measurements were made and could result in a change of exposure to endotoxin.

In view of the above, a correct conclusion from the material presented is that ‘no relation between endotoxin exposure and lung cancer risk could be detected'.

References

  1. Checkoway H, Lundin JI, Costello S, Ray R, Li W, Eisen EA, Astrakianakis G, Seixas N, Applebaum K, Gao DL, Thomas DB (2014) Possible pro-carcinogenic association of endotoxin on lung cancer among Shanghai women textile workers. Br J Cancer 111: 603–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lenters V, Basinas I, Beane-Freeman I, Boffetta P, Checkoway H, Coggon D, Portengen L, Sim M, Wouters IM, Heederik D, Vermeulen R (2010) Endotoxin exposure and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature on agriculture and cotton textile workers. Cancer Causes Control 21: 523–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Maestrangelo G, Grange J, Fadda E, Fedeli U, Buja A, Lange JH (2005) Lung cancer risk effect of dairy farming and the consequence of removing occupational exposure. Am J Epidemiol 161: 1037–1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rylander R (1992) Environmental exposures with decreased risk for lung cancer? Int J Epidemiol 19: S67–S71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rylander R, Axelsson G (2006) Lung cancer risk in relation to vegetable and fruit consumption and smoking. Int J Cancer 118: 739–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Seow A, Poh WT, The M, Eng P, Wang YT, Tan WC, Chia KS, Yu M, Lee HP (2002) Diet, reproductive factors, and lung cancer risk among Chinese women in Singapore: evidence for a protective effect of soy in non-smokers. Int J Cancer 97: 365–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES