Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2015 Oct 23;112(43):739. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0739a

Correspondence (letter to the editor): Prevention of Anal Carcinoma

Alexander Kreuter *, Stefan Esser **, Ulrike Wieland ***
PMCID: PMC4647319  PMID: 26568183

The article by Raptis and colleagues provides an excellent overview on the current state of the diagnostic evaluation and therapy of anal carcinoma (1). We wish to comment on three particular aspects in the article.

Similar to cervical cancer, anal cancer is potentially preventable by means of screening examinations. The authors mention that so far, no internationally accepted guidelines have been issued on the screening of high risk groups. Although that is correct, a German-Austrian guideline has existed since 2013, which was published by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), on the prevention, diagnostic evaluation, and therapy of anal dysplasias and carcinomas in HIV-infected individuals (2). This guideline recommends, in addition to clinical inspection of the anogenital region and digital rectal examination, anal cytology testing and, in case of a pathological findings or in patients at particularly high risk, they additionally recommend high-resolution anoscopy with biopsy, in analogy to colposcopy.

The authors mention that so far, no recommendations exist with regard to vaccination against anal cancers. A large controlled study showed the efficacy of the prophylactic quadrivalent HIV vaccine in preventing anal dysplasias in men who have sex with men (MSM). For this reason, as well as for the purpose of preventing genital warts, vaccinating MSM is explicitly recommended in the United Kingdom, since MSM do not benefit from the herd immunity conferred by vaccinating girls (3).

The authors say that according to US and European guidelines, primarily surgical treatment is indicated only in well differentiated cancers of the anal margin in stage T1. A recently published study showed, however, that T1 cancers localized in the anal canal can also be treated curatively by using excision and a safety resection margin <5 mm (4). It was thus possible to avoid radiotherapy, as is otherwise recommended in early invasive cancers of the anal canal.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

Prof Kreuter has received lecture honoraria for lectures and consultancy fees (advisory board) from MSD Sanofi Pasteur. Dr Esser has participated as a local investigator in Germany in the “Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent Vaccine Study” of Merck and MSD Sanofi Pasteur. Prof Wieland has received lecture honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Becton Dickinson, and A&O Labor Delitzsch.

References

  • 1.Raptis D, Schneider I, Matzel KE, Ott O, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W. The differential diagnosis and interdisciplinary treatment of anal carcinoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:243–249. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. S2k-Leitlinie: Anale Dysplasien und Analkarzinome bei HIV-Infizierten: Prävention, Diagnostik und Therapie. www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/055-007.html. (last accessed on 23 2015).
  • 3.Kirby T. UK committee recommends HPV vaccination for MSM. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71128-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berry JM, Jay N, Cranston RD, et al. Progression of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to invasive anal cancer among HIV-infected men who have sex with men. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:1147–1155. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES