Abstract
Background
The specification of vein and the patterning of intersegmental vessels (ISV) controlled by transcription factor is not fully characterized. The orphan nuclear receptor Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor II (CoupTFII, a.k.a NR2F2) positively regulates vein identity in mice. In this study, we show that nr2f1b is important for vein and tip cell identity during zebrafish development.
Results
Nr2f1b mRNA is expressed in ventral lateral mesoderm at 15S stage and in vessels at 24 hpf consistent with a role in early vascular specification. Morpholino knockdown of nr2f1b results in a decrease in both vein cell number and expression of the vein specific marker flt4 and mrc1, suggested its role in venous specification. We also show loss of nr2f1b reduced ISV cell number and impairs ISV growth, which is likely due to the impairment of angiogenic cells migration and/or proliferation by time-lapse imaging. Consequently, nr2f1b morphants showed pericardial edema and circulation defects. Overexpression of nr2f1b under the fli promoter increases the number of venous cells and ISV endothelial cells indicated the function of nr2f1b is required and necessary for vascular development. We further showed that nr2f1b likely interact with Notch signalling. nr2f1b expression is increased in rbpsuh morphants and DAPT-treatment embryos suggested nr2f1b is negatively regulated by Notch activity.
Conclusions
We show nr2f1b control venous specification and angiogenic patterning during zebrafish vascular development, which is mediated by Notch signalings.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12929-015-0209-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Nr2f1b, Angiogenesis, vein and tip cell identity, ISV (intersegmental vessel)
Background
Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis are two processes to establish the pattern of blood vessels network in vertebrates [1, 2]. In the developing zebrafish trunk, a stereotypic pattern of vascular development begins with dorsal aorta (DA) and posterior cardinal vein (PCV) formation at the midline by fusion of angioblast progenitors migrating from the lateral posterior mesoderm by the 17 somite (17S) stage [3]. Development of the intersegmental vessels (ISVs) of the trunk begins with an angioblast sprouting from the DA, proliferating and migrating dorsally until it reaches the dorsal aspect of the embryo and connects with adjacent ISV cells to form the dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessels (DLAVs). The leading cells to migrate from the vessel are called tip cells, are proliferative and show multiple filopodia, while the less proliferative, stationary cells which lumenize behind the tip cell are called stalk cells [4, 5].
Many genes and signal pathways have been identified that regulate the specification and maintenance of arterial identity during vasculogenesis, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), nrp1, delta-like 4 (dll4), gridlock, foxc1 and foxc2 (reviewed in [6, 7]), Signalling through the Notch receptor is a major contributor to arterial identity as loss of Notch leads to a decrease in the number of cells expressing arterial markers and an increase in cells expressing venous markers [5]. While a number of signaling molecules have been identified to promote arterial identify, there is less description about transcription factors that promote a venous identity. In mice study, the orphan nuclear receptor NR2F2 is expressed in venous endothelial cells [8–10]. Loss of NR2F2 in mouse results in ectopic expression of arterial markers in the vein with loss of the venous endothelial cell identity and acquisition of arterial phenotypes. Thus, NR2F2 functions as the key regulator of venous identity [9]. Recent studies in zebrafish and xenopus showed that nr2f2 and SoxF regulated venous differentiation [11, 12].
During the development of intersegmental vessel (ISV) sprouts from the dorsal aorta, angioblasts will specify two cell identities, the migratory tip cell that senses attractive and repulsive through the extension of filopodia, or the stalk cell that lumenizes to form an intersegmental vessels (ISVs) [13–15]. ISV angiogenesis has been shown that regulated by VEGF and Notch-flt4 (Fms-related tyrosine kinase 4) signalings. Knockdown of VEGFR2 disrupt ISV formation and loss of Notch signaling results in a significant increase ISV cells and increase in Flt4 expression [5]. Conversely, loss of Vegfc or Flt4 impaired ISV growth and a decreased number of angioblasts in each ISV [16]. Moreover, activation of Notch signaling also results in stalled ISV growth mid-somite, suggesting that Notch represses the Vegfc-Flt4 signaling cascade [17]. In recent years, many molecules, such as cxcr4, UNC5B, angiomotin, pdgfb and trpc1 have been shown involved in angiogenesis [16, 18–21]. Thus, genetic interaction and coordination contributes to the control of endothelial tip-stalk cell behaviors during angiogenesis. Of those factors, NR2F2 in mice has been shown function in angiogenesis mediated by the upregulation of Angiopoietin-1 in addition to its role in venous differentiation [8]. However, we still have limited knowledge of the role of transcription factors in tip cell specification. Surprisingly, nr2f2, which plays a major role in venous specification in mice, acts only a minor role in zebrafish vascular development based on our study and recent publications ([11, 12] and our unpublished results).
During the vascular development in mouse, NR2F2 acts as a major regulator in venous identity and in angiogenic growth [8, 9]. In addition, Nr2f2 interacts with Prox1 physically to specific lymphatic endothelial fate and promote the formation of lymphatic vessels [22, 23]. Our previous study in zebrafish showed that nr2f2 in zebrafish plays a minor role in venous identity and ISV growth but functions critically in lymphogenesis, similar to recent reports. On the other hand, the related transcription factor NR2F1 is a critical regulator of CNS and peripheral nervous system development and controls cell differentiation in the inner ear [24–26]. However, a vascular function of NR2F1 has not yet been documented.
In this study, we hypothesized that nr2f1b has a critical role in blood vessel formation in zebrafish. We showed that loss of nr2f1b reduced venous cells and the expression of vein specific markers. We also showed that nr2f1b morphant reduces ISV cells and impairs ISV growth. While overexpression of nr2f1b, we observed the increase of vein and ISV cells, suggesting that nr2f1b play a role in promoting vein and tip cell identity. We further showed that nr2f1b functions in vascular development mediated by Notch signalling.
Methods
Zebrafish strains and husbandry
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) wild-type Tupfel Long Fin (TL) or transgenic lines: Tg(kdrl:eGFP)la116, Tg(kdrl:mCherry)ci5, Tg(gata:dsRed), Tg(fli1a:egfp)y1 and Tg(fli1a:negfp)y7 have been described [27–30]. Zebrafish were raised and maintained at the 28.5 °C fish room in a 20 L circulating system with filtered fresh water and aeration under the 14 hr: 10 hr (light: dark) lighting conditions. Zebrafish embryos were raised in E3 embryo media (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4 and supplemented with 0.25 mg/L methylene blue) at 28.5 °C according to the Zebrafish Book [31]. Embryo development and stages were measured in hour post-fertilization (hpf). Chorions were removed by incubation in 20 mg/ml pronase (Sigma) and endogenous pigmentation was blocked by adding 0.003 % N-phenylthiourea (PTU; Sigma) to E3 media at 6 hpf. All animal experiments are approved from the National Sun Yat-sen University Animal Care Committee (approval reference #10109)
Whole-mount in situ hybridization
Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described in [32]. nr2f1b probe template was amplified by PCR using primers described in Additional file 1: Table S1 and in vitro transcription using T7 Polymerase (Roche) with DIG-labeled UTP. The flt4, mrc1, notch3 and ephrinb2 probes have been described [33–35]. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) was performed as previously described [35, 36]. Briefly, Embryos were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), permeabilized in 10 μg/mL Proteinase K, hybridized with DIG-labeled probes, washed, reacted with AP-conjugated anti-Dig antibody (Roche) and then proceeded to react with NBT/BCIP substrate (Roche). The reaction was stopped and embryos were fixed with PFA. Embryos were embedded in 3 % methylcellulose (Sigma) and photographed.
Imaging
Fixed embryos or live embryos were embedded in 3 % methylcellulose or 1.5 % low melt agarose (Invitrogen) and photographed with a Zeiss Axiocam HRc camera (Carl Zeiss) on a Zeiss Lumar V12 stereomicroscope. Confocal images were collected on a Zeiss LSM510 or LSM700 microscope, and stacked images generated by ImageJ or ZEN 2012 software (Carl Zeiss). The number of cells in the vein and ISVs was determined by counting from individual slices of confocal stacks. The counting area is between 5th and 15th ISVs of the embryo.
For histology, embryos were sectioned at 5-7 μM in JB-4 plastic medium (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) and photographed with a Magnafire camera (Optronics, Galeta, CA). Alternatively, embryos were fixed with Tek OCT freezing medium and cryo-sectioned at 10 μM using a Leica CM3050S cryostat and photographed with an SPOT RT3 camera (DIAGNOSTIC Inc.).
Morpholino and Tol2 DNA Injections
Morpholinos for nr2f1b and rbpsuh genes were designed and ordered from Gene-Tools, LLC (Philomath, OR), dissolved in H2O to a 2 mM stock and further diluted to the working concentration with 0.5 % phenol red (Sigma). Sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Microinjections were performed to manipulate gene expression. MOs or expression vectors were injected into 1-2-cell-stage embryos on a 3 % agar plate. After injection, embryos were cultured in E3 buffer. The Tol2kit was used to generate nr2f1b overexpression driven by 0.8kb fli1a promoter construct [37]. Approximately 100 pg of plasmid DNA was co-injected with 50 pg of Tol2 mRNA into 1-cell embryos. Success of transient Tg(fli1:nr2f1b) overexpressing embryos can be verified by GFP signal expression driven by cmlc (cardiomyocyte light chain) promoter from the vector backbone.
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from embryos at desired developmental stages and purified using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized with Superscript III reverse transcriptase and oligo-dT primer (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the DNA Engine Opticon System (MJ Research Inc.) with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) or using the LightCycle 96 instrument (Roche Inc.) with SYBR Green I Master (Roche). qPCR primers are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Relative gene expression levels were analyzed by the ΔΔ Ct method, with elongation factor 1α (EF1α) as a reference gene All reactions were performed as biological triplicates.
DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester) treatment
Embryos were treated with DAPT (Sigma), γ-secretase specific inhibitor to block Notch signalling, 75 μM for the working concentration in E3 medium at 6 hpf. Control embryos were treated with an equivalent concentration 0.3 % of DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxide, Sigma).
Results
nr2f1b mRNA is expressed in vessels during zebrafish development
We sought to understand the role of the orphan nuclear receptors in venous angioblast development. Loss of NR2F2 in mouse leads to an almost complete loss of the cardinal vein, however, morpholino knockdown of nr2f2 in zebrafish leads to only a reduction in venous marker expression without obvious defects in vein and ISVs ([11, 12] and our unpublished result). Since nuclear receptors subfamily 2 group f members (NR2F2) in mammalian and vertebrates are highly conserved, we hypothesized that nr2f1b in zebrafish might play an important role in vasculature.
To examine the role of nr2f1b in vascular development, we first analyze the expression of nr2f1b by whole-mount in situ hybridization during zebrafish development. At the 15 somite stage (S), nr2f1b is expressed in the telencephalon (t), ventral medial diencephalon (d), hindbrain rhombomeres (h) and lateral plate mesoderm (Fig. 1a). The lateral plate mesoderm is the location of vascular precursors. At 20 hpf (~24S), we observed that nr2f1b is expressed in the vessels (Fig. 1b). At 24 hpf, nr2f1b is expressed in the telencephalon, diencephalon, hindbrain, as well as vessels of the trunk and caudal vein plexus (CVP) (Fig. 1c, c’). Transverse sections of embryos confirm this localization (Fig. 1d, e). The expression of nr2f1b in vasculature during embryonic development and suggests that it may play an important role.
Morpholino knockdown of nr2f1b causes vascular defects
To identify a functional role of nr2f1b in vascular development, we used transgentic fish Tg(kdrl:eGFP)la116 which express GFP in endothelial cells [29] and morpholino-based knockdown technique. We knocked down the expression of nr2f1b in embryos by injection of 3 ng of morpholino targeted against the intron 1-exon 2 splice junction (nr2f1bi1e2MO), which showed two major vascular phenotypes. First, impairment of ISV growth is observed in nr2f1bi1e2 morphants at 30 hpf, where ISV growth is stalled at mid-somite and ISV pattern is not completed (Fig. 2b) with 89 % of ISVs (n = 400 ISVs from 40 embryos) compared to 7 % of ISVs stalled in uninjected controls (n = 260 ISVs from 26 embryos). The second phenotype we observe is decreased levels of kdrl:GFP transgene expression in the posterior cardinal vein (PCV) as compared to uninjected controls at 30 hpf (Fig. 2b). Two additional morpholinos targeting either the translation initiation site (nr2f1bATGMO) or the exon 1-intron 1 splice junction (nr2f1be1i1MO) result in nearly identical phenotypes (Fig. 2e, f), providing evidence for the specificity of the morpholino knockdown. To further confirm the specificity of our morpholino experiments, we performed rescue experiments by overexpression of nr2f1b in wild-type and nr2f1bi1e2 morphant embryos. Transient transgenic overexpression of nr2f1b in endothelial cells under the fli1 promoter rescues ISV stalling by 40 % in nr2f1b morphants (n = 220 from 22 embryos) compared to injection of nr2f1b morpholino alone (Fig. 2c, g), while overexpression of nr2f1b in wild-type embryos has no obvious defect on vascular development (Fig. 2d, n = 250 from 25 embryos).
We tested the efficiency and specificity of nr2f1bi1e2 morpholino knockdown. Injection of 1.7 ng or 3 ng of nr2f1bi1e2 morpholino showed dose-dependent disruption of normal splicing of nr2f1b as determined by RT-PCR (Additional file 1: Figure S1A, B), suggesting the efficiency of nr2f1b knockdown. Sequence comparison of nr2f1bi1e2 morpholino targeting to nr2f1a and nr2f2 showed only 52 % and 28 % identity, respectively. Moreover, injection of nr2f1bi1e2 morpholino greatly decrease the amount of the nr2f1b product, but nr2f1a and nr2f2 levels were not decreased compared to uninjected controls as determined by RT-PCR, indicating the specificity of the morpholino knockdown of nr2f1b (Additional file 1: Figure S1C, D).
Further, nr2f1b morphant phenotypes do not result from morpholino-induced non-specific cell death as there is no significant increase in apoptosis in the trunk of morphants compared to wild type embryos by TUNEL staining (Additional file 1: Figure S2). These results suggested the phenotypes of stalled ISV growth and decreased venous kdrl transgene expression are specific to the down-regulation of nr2f1b and indicate that nr2f1b plays a key role in zebrafish vascular development. To test if loss of nr2f1b would decrease cell proliferation, we counted the numbers of endothelial cells per ISV in the Tg (kdrl:mCherryci5; fli1a:negfpy7) embryos, where GFP was expressed in the nucleus of endothelial cells and the mCherry tag in the cytoplasm. Loss of nr2f1b showed significantly reduced ISV cell numbers compared to uninjected wild type embryos (1.8 ± 0.8 cells per ISV, n = 107 ISV from 18 embryos of nr2f1b morphants and 3.8 ± 0.8 cells, n = 108 ISV from 16 wt embryo, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 H-J). These data suggest that nr2f1b is required for ISV cell growth to contribute to the vascular development, likely by regulation of the proliferation or migration of the cells. Finally, a third phenotype was observed that loss of nr2f1b results in pericardial edema, absent parachordal vessels, mispatterned subintestinal vessel plexus and circulation defects at later stages from 48 hpf to 72 hpf (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Since edema and lack of circulation are common secondary consequences of defective blood vessel formation. The circulation defects consistent with the role of nr2f1b in vascular development.
Nr2f1b promotes vein identity
Reduced kdrl-transgene expression in the PCV of nr2f1b morphant embryos could result from decreased number of cells contributing to the PCV or decreased venous endothelial marker expression of resident endothelial cells. Thus, we analyzed whether the number of endothelial cells is reduced in the PCV in nr2f1b morphants by using Tg(fli1a:neGFP)y7 embryos which expressing GFP in endothelial cell nuclei and counting venous cells in the PCV in the region of the yolk extension (i. e. between 5th to 15th ISVs) at 30 hpf. Uninjected control embryos have an average of 82.5 ± 11.5 cells (n = 14 embryos) in this region while nr2f1bi1e2 morphants have a significantly decreased number of cells with an average of 61.8 ± 14.7 cells (n = 12 embryos; p < 0.0001; Fig. 3a-c). Decreased PCV cell number suggests that loss of nr2f1b leads to a defect in the specification of venous cells contributing to the PCV but without a fate switch to an arterial fate. Instead, we observed slightly decreased number of cells contributing to the DA in the same region (67.5 ± 7.3 cells in wt and 57.9 ± 8.3 cells, p < 0.01), however, overexpression of nr2f1b did not increase the arterial cells (69.1 ± 10.9 cells, n = 10, p = 0.68), suggesting the minor necessary role of nr2f1b in aorta differentiation (data not shown).
To determine if loss of nr2f1b results in altered expression of arterial and venous markers, we examined the expression flt4, mrc1, notch3, and ephrinb2 by ISH in nr2f1b morphants. No obvious differences in the expression of the arterial markers notch3 and ephrinb2 were observed in nr2f1b morphants compared to controls at 24 hpf by both lateral view (Fig. 3i-l) and cross-section images (Fig. 3i’-l’). Conversely, expression of the venous markers flt4 and mrc1 was diminished in nr2f1b morphants compared to wild type controls at 24 hpf by both lateral view (Fig. 3e-h) and cross-section images (Fig. 3e’-h’). To determine the extent of decreased marker expression, we quantified flt4 and ephrinb2 transcript levels by qPCR and identified a 60 % decrease in flt4 expression but no change in ephrinb2 expression in nr2f1b morphants (Fig. 3d). These results suggest that the decrease in venous markers expression most likely due to a decreased number of vein cells.
To test whether excess nr2f1b might increase the number of cells contributing to the PCV, we over-expressed nr2f1b under control of the fli1a promoter. Overexpression of nr2f1b in transient transgenic embryos has a slight but significant increase on PCV cell number (100.3 ± 17.7 cells, n = 10) compared to uninjected controls (82.5 ± 11.5 cell; p < 0.01 by student t-test) (Fig. 4a-c). Taken all together, the our data suggests that nr2f1b has a role in venous endothelial cell specification as loss and over-expression of nr2f1b results in decreased and increased numbers of endothelial cells contributing to the PCV, respectively.
nr2f1b modulates the number and migration of angioblasts in intersegmental vessels
The number of cells comprising the trunk intersegmental vessels is regulated by a number of pathways where reduced numbers of cells per ISV can result in ISV growth defect. To determine if a reduced number of cells was present in stalled ISVs, the number of cells per ISV was assessed after knockdown of nr2f1b in Tg(fli1a:negfp)y7 or Tg (kdrl:mCherryci5; fli1a:negfpy7) embryos (Fig. 5a-b and Fig. 2h-i). We observed a reduced ISV cells in nr2f1b morphants compared to wild-type control (Fig. 2j) and the distribution of ISV cells showed at less cells area in nr2f1b MO as compared to uninjected embryos (Fig. 3c). Moreover, endothelial-specific over-expression of nr2f1b using the fli1 promoter results in an increased average number of cells per ISV (4.3 ± 0.9; n = 88 ISVs) in transient transgenic embryos compared to 3.8 ± 0.7 cells (n = 86 ISVs) in wild type (p < 0.0005) (Fig. 4d-f). These data suggest that nr2f1b is necessary and sufficient to promote a tip cell identity for ISV growth.
To examine whether migration of ISV angioblasts is deficient, time-lapse imaging was performed in wild type Tg(kdrl:eGFP)la116 and nr2f1b knockdown embryos. Superimposition of images of 23hpf embryo (red) on the same embryo at 26hpf (green) shows an average of an over 50 % decreased area of extension/migration of ISVs in nr2f1b morphants as compared to wild type embryos (Fig. 5d-j). The decrease in extension could represent decreased protrusive activity of angioblasts, or could result from fewer angioblasts migrating. We therefore examined ISV cell number in Tg(fli1a:neGFP)y7 transgenic embryos on these time-lapse images. We found cells showed slower migration and ISVs that eventually migrate to the DLAV in nr2f1b morphants have fewer cells per ISV (Fig. 5k-p) than wild type, suggesting that nr2f1b regulates the number of cells in an ISV and the migration of ISV. Together, these data suggest that nr2f1b modulates the number and migration of angioblasts during ISV growth.
Interaction between nr2f1b and Notch signaling
We have demonstrated that knockdown of nr2f1b expression by morphlino injection results in ISV stalling at the midline with a decrease in the number of cells per ISV, while over-expression of nr2f1b leads to an increased number of cells per ISV. These observations are qualitatively similar to those seen with modulation of Notch signaling where activation of Notch signaling gives ISV stalling at the midline, while loss of notch signaling leads to an increased number of cells per ISV (Siekmann 2007). Thus, we sought to determine if Notch regulates nr2f1b expression. Notch signaling involves two sequential proteolytic processing events (ADAM protease and γ-secretase) that release the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) into cytoplasm followed by translocation to the nucleus where it interacts with the transcription factor rbpsuh (recombination binding protein/ suppressor of hairless) to activation of target genes. DAPT specifically inhibit γ -secretase involved in the cleavage of NICD and prevents Noch activation. Therefore, to test if nr2f1b interacts with Notch signaling, we suppressed Notch signaling by rbpsuhMO injection (Fig. 6a-c) or DAPT treatment (Fig. 6d-f). We found nr2f1b expression is upregulated when Notch signals were inhibited, with a 2-2.5 fold increase by using in-situ hybridization and qPCR (Fig. 6). These results suggest that nr2f1b might act downstream of Notch signals. We next asked whether nr2f1b and Notch genetically interact to control ISV growth. To test this, we performed a rescue experiment by injecting nr2f1b morpholino in an rbpsuh morphants (rbpsuhMO). Wild type embryos at 30 hpf have an average of 3.6 ± 0.6 cells per ISV (Fig. 6g, k). nr2f1b morphants have an average of 1.7 ± 0.7 cells per ISV, while rbpsuh morphants have an average of 6.2 ± 1.6 cells per ISV (Fig. 6h, i, k). Knockdown of rbpsuh in combined with nr2f1b morpholino injection reduces the number of cells per ISV to wild type levels 3.8 ± 1.2 (Fig. 6j, K; n = 25 ISV from 4 fish; p = 0.56, unpaired student t-test). Together, these data suggest nr2f1b likely acts downstream of Notch signaling and antagonizes Notch signals to control ISV growth.
Discussion
nr2f1b expressed in developing vessels functioning in vasculature
In this study, we observed the expression of nr2f1b in lateral plate mesoderm at early stage and developing vessels (Fig. 1) corresponding to the location in which primitive angioblasts are developing and acquiring arterial and venous identity. At 24hpf, the expression pattern of nr2f1b continues in the vasculature, suggested the role of nr2f1b in vascular development. We further have shown that knockdown of nr2f1b results in vascular defects, including ISV growth impairment, pericardial edema, less venous cells and results in loss of circulation (Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S3). In fact, there is no parachorda vessel (PCV, pre-structure of lymphatic duct) formation and defects in caudal vessel plexus (CVP) (data not shown) suggested that the impairment of venous angiogenesis at late developmental stage, which is likely the later effects of loss of nr2f1b.
nr2f1b functions in vein identity and the growth of intersegmental vessels
Here, we explored the function of nr2f1b modulates vein identity. We showed the decrease of endothelial venous cells and the expression of venous markers flt4 and mrc1; however, there is no obvious change in the expression of arterial markers notch3 and ephrinb2 (Fig. 3) although there is a slight decrease of arterial cells. This suggested that nr2f1b is not involved in artery-vein fate switching. Thus, the reduction in cell number and the loss of vein marker expression together suggest that nr2f1b is necessary for normal vein development. We also showed that overexpression of nr2f1b has a slight but significant increase on PCV cell number (Fig. 4). Together, those data suggest the role of nr2f1b is necessary and sufficient for vein development.
Intersegmental vessels form from angioblasts sprouting from the dorsal aorta and vein. Stalling of intersegmental vessel growth at the mid somite might therefore either occur through defective proliferation or defective migration of cells. Here, we showed in nr2f1b morphants contains less cells compared to in wild-type (Fig. 5). We also showed a significant increase in ISV cell numbers suggesting that nr2f1b is necessary and sufficient to promote a proliferation of ISV cells. Further examining the migration of ISV angioblasts in nr2f1b knockdown Tg(fli1a:eGFP)y1 and Tg(fli1a:neGFP)y7embryos, we showed that the decrease in extension represent the decreased protrusive activity of angioblasts and fewer angioblasts in migrating (Fig. 5), suggesting that nr2f1b regulates the number of cells in an ISV and the migration of ISV. Loss of nr2f1b in zebrafish leads to decreased numbers of cells in the posterior cardinal vein and in ISVs, but the ultimate fate of these cells remains unknown. TUNEL analysis suggests that cell death is not increased in the trunk region and we did not observe additional cells contributing to the artery or ISVs. This suggests there may be a lack of proliferation of venous precursors or these cells may adopt a closely related fate in the mesoderm lineage, such as blood.
Interaction between nr2f1b, nr2f2 and isl2 in regulating vein identity and ISV growth?
We previous identified isl2 promotes vein and tip cell identity (paper under revision) and nr2f2 also plays minor role on that although NR2F2 is a major determinant of venous identity in mouse. In this study, we showed that zebrafish Nr2f1b ortholog to mouse NR2F2 plays a major role in vein and tip cell identity. It has been shown that LIM-homeodimer transcription factor isl1 (an ortholog of Isl2) and CoupTFI physically bind together in vitro and in vivo to activate transcription [38], suggesting the possible interaction between isl2 and nr2f1b to control vascular development. Thus, whether Nr2f1b/Nr2f2 and Isl2 also physically interact at the protein level to activate target genes and regulate endothelial cell identity remains an interesting avenue to explore in the future. Meanwhile, it would be also intriguing to address if any other signaling molecules in addition to notch, such as vegf, wnt or BMP etc. that interact with nr2f1b and/or isl2. The molecular mechanisms that how nr2f1b regulate its targets in vascular development is still unknown and we are currently addressing this question by processing and analyzing genome-wide transcriptome results.
Does zebrafish Nr2f1b play a conserved role in vasculature similar to nr2f2 in mice?
Swift’s study showed SoxF factors and Notch regulate nr2f2 gene expression during venous differentiation [12] and Aranguren et al showed coupTFII functions in venous and lymphatic development in both zebrafish and Xenopus [11]. However, knockdown nr2f2 in both studies did not see obvious defects in vascular development, but reduction of venous gene expression, suggest nr2f2 control venous differentiation, instead of specification. In this study, we showed that zebrafish Nr2f1b ortholog to mouse Nr2f2 and plays a major role in vein and tip cell identity, which is consistent with the function of nr2f2 in mice [9]. Those data indicate that the conserved vascular function of coupTF family among the vertebrates. Phylogenetic analysis of coupTFs amino acids among the vertebrates suggests that zebrafish nr2f1b and nr2f2 are very closer to mammalian nr2f2 (over 83 % identical). It would be intriguing to address if any functional rescue or compensation between zebrafish nr2f1b and mouse nr2f2.
Conclusions
In summary, our study demonstrated that nr2f1b has a critical role in blood vessel formation in zebrafish. We showed that loss of nr2f1b reduced venous cells and the expression of vein specific markers. We also showed that nr2f1b morphant reduces ISV cells and impairs ISV growth. While overexpression of nr2f1b increase vein and ISV cells, suggesting that nr2f1b play a role in promoting vein and tip cell identity. We further showed that nr2f1b functions in vascular development in concert with Notch signalling.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (NSC101-2311-B-110-002, NSC102-2311-B-110-002 and MOST103-2311-B-110-004) and from the NSYSU-KMU Joint Research Project (NSYSUKMU 102-P028 and NSYSUKMU103-P031) to CYW. We thank Taiwan Zebrafish Core Facility at Academia Sinica (TZCAS) and the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI), which is supported by Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST-102-2321-B-001-038) in Taiwan for providing wild-type and transgenic zebrafish. We thank Dr. Sarah Childs for providing the primers, plasmids and in-situ hybridization probes used in this work. We would like to thank Dr. Sarah Childs, Dr. Ryan Lamont, Dr. Zhi-Hong Wen and Dr. Tai Ming-Hong for their helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript.
Additional file
Footnotes
Ru-Fang Li and Ting-Yun Wu contributed equally to this work.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CYW conceived and designed experiments. RFL, TYW, YZM, YSW performed the experiments. CLC and CYW carried out the confocal image processing and data analysis. RFL, TYW and CYW drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Risau W. Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 1997;386:671–674. doi: 10.1038/386671a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. Arteries and veins: making a difference with zebrafish. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:674–682. doi: 10.1038/nrg888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Isogai S, Lawson ND, Torrealday S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM. Angiogenic network formation in the developing vertebrate trunk. Development. 2003;130:5281–5290. doi: 10.1242/dev.00733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Childs S, Chen J-N, Garrity D, Fishman M. Patterning of angiogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Development. 2002;129:973–982. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.4.973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Siekmann AF, Lawson ND. Notch signalling limits angiogenic cell behaviour in developing zebrafish arteries. Nature. 2007;445:781–784. doi: 10.1038/nature05577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lamont RE, Childs S. MAPping out arteries and veins. Sci STKE. 2006;2006:pe39. doi: 10.1126/stke.3552006pe39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Swift MR, Weinstein BM. Arterial-venous specification during development. Circ Res. 2009;104:576–588. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.188805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pereira FA, Qiu Y, Zhou G, Tsai MJ, Tsai SY. The orphan nuclear receptor COUP-TFII is required for angiogenesis and heart development. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1037–1049. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.8.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.You LR, Lin FJ, Lee CT, DeMayo FJ, Tsai MJ, Tsai SY. Suppression of Notch signalling by the COUP-TFII transcription factor regulates vein identity. Nature. 2005;435:98–104. doi: 10.1038/nature03511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yamazaki T, Yoshimatsu Y, Morishita Y, Miyazono K, Watabe T. COUP-TFII regulates the functions of Prox1 in lymphatic endothelial cells through direct interaction. Genes Cells. 2009;14:425–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aranguren XL, Beerens M, Vandevelde W, Dewerchin M, Carmeliet P, Luttun A. Transcription factor COUP-TFII is indispensable for venous and lymphatic development in zebrafish and Xenopus laevis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;410:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Swift MR, Pham VN, Castranova D, Bell K, Poole RJ, Weinstein BM. SoxF factors and Notch regulate nr2f2 gene expression during venous differentiation in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2014;390:116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gerhardt H, Golding M, Fruttiger M, Ruhrberg C, Lundkvist A, Abramsson A, Jeltsch M, Mitchell C, Alitalo K, Shima D, Betsholtz C. VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. J Cell Biol. 2003;161:1163–1177. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200302047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adams RH, Alitalo K. Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:464–478. doi: 10.1038/nrm2183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Baldessari D, Mione M. How to create the vascular tree? (Latest) help from the zebrafish. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;118:206–230. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Covassin LD, Villefranc JA, Kacergis MC, Weinstein BM, Lawson ND. Distinct genetic interactions between multiple Vegf receptors are required for development of different blood vessel types in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:6554–6559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506886103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leslie JD, Ariza-McNaughton L, Bermange AL, McAdow R, Johnson SL, Lewis J. Endothelial signalling by the Notch ligand Delta-like 4 restricts angiogenesis. Development. 2007;134:839–844. doi: 10.1242/dev.003244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aase K, Ernkvist M, Ebarasi L, Jakobsson L, Majumdar A, Yi C, Birot O, Ming Y, Kvanta A, Edholm D, et al. Angiomotin regulates endothelial cell migration during embryonic angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2055–2068. doi: 10.1101/gad.432007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Phng LK, Gerhardt H. Angiogenesis: a team effort coordinated by notch. Dev Cell. 2009;16:196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wiens KM, Lee HL, Shimada H, Metcalf AE, Chao MY, Lien CL. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta is critical for zebrafish intersegmental vessel formation. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu PC, Gu SY, Bu JW, Du JL. TRPC1 is essential for in vivo angiogenesis in zebrafish. Circ Res. 2010;106:1221–1232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.207670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wigle JT, Oliver G. Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell. 1999;98:769–778. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81511-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee S, Kang J, Yoo J, Ganesan SK, Cook SC, Aguilar B, Ramu S, Lee J, Hong YK. Prox1 physically and functionally interacts with COUP-TFII to specify lymphatic endothelial cell fate. Blood. 2009;113:1856–1859. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-145789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou C, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ. COUP-TFI: an intrinsic factor for early regionalization of the neocortex. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2054–2059. doi: 10.1101/gad.913601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tang LS, Alger HM, Pereira FA. COUP-TFI controls Notch regulation of hair cell and support cell differentiation. Development. 2006;133:3683–3693. doi: 10.1242/dev.02536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Montemayor C, Montemayor OA, Ridgeway A, Lin F, Wheeler DA, Pletcher SD, Pereira FA. Genome-wide analysis of binding sites and direct target genes of the orphan nuclear receptor NR2F1/COUP-TFI. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2002;248:307–318. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Roman BL, Pham VN, Lawson ND, Kulik M, Childs S, Lekven AC, Garrity DM, Moon RT, Fishman MC, Lechleider RJ, Weinstein BM. Disruption of acvrl1 increases endothelial cell number in zebrafish cranial vessels. Development. 2002;129:3009–3019. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.12.3009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Choi J, Dong L, Ahn J, Dao D, Hammerschmidt M, Chen JN. FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Dev Biol. 2007;304:735–744. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Proulx K, Lu A, Sumanas S. Cranial vasculature in zebrafish forms by angioblast cluster-derived angiogenesis. Dev Biol. 2010;348:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Eugene, OR: Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jowett T, Lettice L. Whole-mount in situ hybridizations on zebrafish embryos using a mixture of digoxigenin- and fluorescein-labelled probes. Trends Genet. 1994;10:73–74. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90220-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lawson ND, Scheer N, Pham VN, Kim CH, Chitnis AB, Campos-Ortega JA, Weinstein BM. Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development. Development. 2001;128:3675–3683. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.19.3675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wong KS, Proulx K, Rost MS, Sumanas S. Identification of vasculature-specific genes by microarray analysis of Etsrp/Etv2 overexpressing zebrafish embryos. Dev Dyn. 2009;238:1836–1850. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wu BJ, Chiu CC, Chen CL, Wang WD, Wang JH, Wen ZH, Liu W, Chang HW, Wu CY. Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group F member 1a (nr2f1a) is required for vascular development in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thisse C, Thisse B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:59–69. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kwan KM, Fujimoto E, Grabher C, Mangum BD, Hardy ME, Campbell DS, Parant JM, Yost HJ, Kanki JP, Chien CB. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev Dyn. 2007;236:3088–3099. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gay F, Anglade I, Gong Z, Salbert G. The LIM/homeodomain protein islet-1 modulates estrogen receptor functions. Mol Endocrinol. 2000;14:1627–1648. doi: 10.1210/mend.14.10.0538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]