Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2015 Sep 17;71(Pt 10):i8–i9. doi: 10.1107/S2056989015016904

Crystal structure of CdSO4(H2O): a redetermination

Chatphorn Theppitak a, Kittipong Chainok b,*
PMCID: PMC4647421  PMID: 26594423

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, cadmium sulfate monohydrate or poly[(μ2-aqua)(μ4-sulfato)­cadmium], was redetermined based on modern CMOS (complementary metal oxide silicon) data. In comparison with the previous study [Bregeault & Herpin (1970). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr. 93, 37–42], all non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters and the hydrogen-bonding pattern unambiguously established due to location of the hydrogen atoms. In addition, a significant improvement in terms of precision and accuracy was achieved. In the crystal, the Cd2+ cation is coordinated by four O atoms of four sulfate anions and two O atoms of water mol­ecules, forming a distorted octa­hedral trans-[CdO6] polyhedron. Each sulfate anion bridges four Cd2+ cations and each water mol­ecule bridges two Cd2+ cations, leading to the formation of a three-dimensional framework, with Cd⋯Cd separations in the range 4.0757 (2)–6.4462 (3) Å. O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions of medium strength between the coordinating water mol­ecules and sulfate anions consolidate the crystal packing.

Keywords: crystal structure, redetermination, cadmium sulfate monohydrate, hydro­thermal synthesis, hydrogen bonding

Related literature  

For the previous report on the structure of the title compound, see: Bregeault & Herpin (1970).

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • CdSO4(H2O)

  • M r = 226.48

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.6195 (3) Å

  • b = 7.4517 (3) Å

  • c = 8.1457 (3) Å

  • β = 122.244 (1)°

  • V = 391.17 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 6.01 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.22 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII D8 QUEST CMOS diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014) T min = 0.701, T max = 0.746

  • 17459 measured reflections

  • 1004 independent reflections

  • 958 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.023

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.012

  • wR(F 2) = 0.026

  • S = 1.18

  • 1004 reflections

  • 72 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2014); data reduction: SAINT; method used to solve structure: coordinates taken from previous refinement; program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211sup1.cif

e-71-000i8-sup1.cif (538.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211Isup2.hkl

e-71-000i8-Isup2.hkl (81.9KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211Isup3.cdx

2+ x y z x y z x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211fig1.tif

The coordination sphere around the Cd2+ cation with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, 1/2 – y, Inline graphic + z; (ii) –x, 1 – y, –z; (iii) 1 – x, −Inline graphic + y, 1/2 – z].

b . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211fig2.tif

The three-dimensional framework structure of the title compound in a view along the b axis. Dashed lines indicate inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions.

CCDC reference: 1423357

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ).

DHA DH HA D A DHA
O5H5AO3i 0.82(2) 1.88(2) 2.6958(17) 170(3)
O5H5BO2ii 0.86(2) 1.90(2) 2.7530(17) 173(2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Comparison of bond lengths () in the current and the previous (Bregeault Herpin, 1970) refinement of cadmium sulfate monohydrate.

For the previous refinement: a = 7.607, b = 7.541, c = 8.186, = 121.86 and reliability index R = 0.12.

Bond Current refinement Previous refinement
Cd1O1i 2.2417(12) 2.21(5)
Cd1O2ii 2.2530(13) 2.27(3)
Cd1O3 2.2421(12) 2.36(5)
Cd1O4iii 2.3112(12) 2.33(3)
Cd1O5i 2.3210(12) 2.24(3)
Cd1O5 2.4024(12) 2.33(3)
S1O1 1.4703(12) 1.50(4)
S1O2 1.4845(12) 1.62(6)
S1O3 1.4831(12) 1.45(3)
S1O4 1.4584(12) 1.42(4)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+Inline graphic, z+Inline graphic; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x+1, y Inline graphic, z+Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Thammasat University Research Fund under the TU Research Scholar.

supplementary crystallographic information

S1. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was obtained serendipitously. CdSO4·8/3H2O (0.256 g, 1 mmol) and 3,6-di-2-pyridyl-1,2,4,5-tetra­zine (0.236 g, 1 mmol) dissolved in water (5 ml) were added to a 23 ml Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 356 K for 5 days. The product was collected by filtration, washed with water and air-dried. Colourless block-shaped crystals of the title compound suitable for X-ray analysis were isolated.

S2. Refinement

The same cell setting and atom numbering scheme as in the previous refinement (Bregeault & Herpin, 1970) were used. Starting coordinates for the atoms were also taken from the previous model. Hydrogen atoms of the water molecules were located from difference Fourier maps and were refined with an O—H distance restraint of 0.85 (2) Å.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The coordination sphere around the Cd2+ cation with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, 1/2 – y, 1/2 + z; (ii) –x, 1 – y, –z; (iii) 1 – x, -1/2 + y, 1/2 – z].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The three-dimensional framework structure of the title compound in a view along the b axis. Dashed lines indicate intermolecular O—H···O hydrogen-bonding interactions.

Crystal data

CdSO4(H2O) F(000) = 424
Mr = 226.48 Dx = 3.846 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.6195 (3) Å Cell parameters from 9894 reflections
b = 7.4517 (3) Å θ = 3.2–30.5°
c = 8.1457 (3) Å µ = 6.01 mm1
β = 122.244 (1)° T = 296 K
V = 391.17 (3) Å3 Block, colourless
Z = 4 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII D8 QUEST CMOS diffractometer 1004 independent reflections
Radiation source: microfocus sealed x-ray tube, Incoatec Iµus 958 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
GraphiteDouble Bounce Multilayer Mirror monochromator Rint = 0.023
Detector resolution: 10.5 pixels mm-1 θmax = 28.7°, θmin = 3.2°
ω and φ scans h = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014) k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.746 l = −10→10
17459 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.012 All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.026 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0107P)2 + 0.2955P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.18 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1004 reflections Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
72 parameters Δρmin = −0.33 e Å3
2 restraints

Special details

Experimental. SADABS was used for absorption correction. wR2(int) was 0.0449 before and 0.0357 after correction. The Ratio of minimum to maximum transmission is 0.9396. The λ/2 correction factor is 0.00150.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cd1 0.21887 (2) 0.26013 (2) 0.26053 (2) 0.01330 (5)
S1 0.25524 (6) 0.61729 (5) 0.01217 (5) 0.01018 (8)
O1 0.13754 (18) 0.50022 (16) −0.15811 (17) 0.0183 (2)
O2 0.1103 (2) 0.75977 (15) −0.00480 (19) 0.0169 (3)
O3 0.32756 (18) 0.51255 (16) 0.19211 (17) 0.0168 (2)
O4 0.43393 (18) 0.69973 (18) 0.02148 (18) 0.0184 (2)
O5 0.27603 (19) 0.09752 (16) 0.03844 (17) 0.0140 (2)
H5A 0.400 (3) 0.074 (4) 0.110 (3) 0.038 (7)*
H5B 0.216 (3) −0.005 (2) 0.016 (3) 0.023 (6)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cd1 0.01176 (7) 0.01373 (7) 0.01200 (7) −0.00165 (4) 0.00472 (5) 0.00087 (4)
S1 0.00809 (16) 0.00898 (17) 0.01063 (17) 0.00001 (13) 0.00310 (14) 0.00041 (13)
O1 0.0156 (6) 0.0170 (6) 0.0158 (6) −0.0004 (5) 0.0041 (5) −0.0054 (5)
O2 0.0122 (6) 0.0134 (6) 0.0206 (6) 0.0027 (4) 0.0058 (5) −0.0018 (4)
O3 0.0155 (6) 0.0153 (6) 0.0147 (5) −0.0019 (5) 0.0048 (5) 0.0046 (4)
O4 0.0101 (5) 0.0224 (6) 0.0198 (6) −0.0022 (5) 0.0061 (5) 0.0047 (5)
O5 0.0120 (5) 0.0133 (5) 0.0145 (5) −0.0008 (4) 0.0055 (5) −0.0001 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Cd1—O1i 2.2417 (12) S1—O3 1.4831 (12)
Cd1—O2ii 2.2530 (13) S1—O4 1.4584 (12)
Cd1—O3 2.2421 (12) O1—Cd1iv 2.2417 (12)
Cd1—O4iii 2.3112 (12) O2—Cd1ii 2.2530 (13)
Cd1—O5i 2.3210 (12) O4—Cd1v 2.3112 (12)
Cd1—O5 2.4024 (12) O5—Cd1iv 2.3211 (12)
S1—O1 1.4703 (12) O5—H5A 0.822 (17)
S1—O2 1.4845 (12) O5—H5B 0.859 (16)
O1i—Cd1—O2ii 82.50 (4) O1—S1—O3 109.76 (7)
O1i—Cd1—O3 175.24 (4) O3—S1—O2 109.52 (8)
O1i—Cd1—O4iii 89.31 (5) O4—S1—O1 112.43 (8)
O1i—Cd1—O5i 92.57 (4) O4—S1—O2 109.35 (7)
O1i—Cd1—O5 88.62 (4) O4—S1—O3 109.03 (7)
O2ii—Cd1—O4iii 161.94 (4) S1—O1—Cd1iv 131.81 (7)
O2ii—Cd1—O5 80.22 (4) S1—O2—Cd1ii 116.42 (7)
O2ii—Cd1—O5i 117.97 (4) S1—O3—Cd1 134.06 (7)
O3—Cd1—O2ii 101.65 (4) S1—O4—Cd1v 140.91 (8)
O3—Cd1—O4iii 86.05 (4) Cd1iv—O5—Cd1 119.27 (5)
O3—Cd1—O5 89.80 (4) Cd1iv—O5—H5A 109.7 (18)
O3—Cd1—O5i 87.54 (4) Cd1—O5—H5A 99.9 (18)
O4iii—Cd1—O5i 78.31 (4) Cd1iv—O5—H5B 113.3 (14)
O4iii—Cd1—O5 83.53 (4) Cd1—O5—H5B 108.6 (14)
O5i—Cd1—O5 161.78 (6) H5A—O5—H5B 104 (2)
O1—S1—O2 106.70 (7)
O1—S1—O2—Cd1ii 2.46 (10) O3—S1—O1—Cd1iv −54.81 (11)
O1—S1—O3—Cd1 −23.82 (12) O3—S1—O2—Cd1ii −116.29 (8)
O1—S1—O4—Cd1v −135.57 (12) O3—S1—O4—Cd1v −13.61 (15)
O2—S1—O1—Cd1iv −173.39 (9) O4—S1—O1—Cd1iv 66.74 (12)
O2—S1—O3—Cd1 93.01 (11) O4—S1—O2—Cd1ii 124.30 (8)
O2—S1—O4—Cd1v 106.10 (13) O4—S1—O3—Cd1 −147.38 (10)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z; (iii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (v) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O5—H5A···O3iii 0.82 (2) 1.88 (2) 2.6958 (17) 170 (3)
O5—H5B···O2vi 0.86 (2) 1.90 (2) 2.7530 (17) 173 (2)

Symmetry codes: (iii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (vi) x, y−1, z.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this paper is available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: WM5211).

References

  1. Bregeault, J. M. & Herpin, P. (1970). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr. 93, 37–42.
  2. Bruker (2014). APEX2, SADABS and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  4. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  5. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211sup1.cif

e-71-000i8-sup1.cif (538.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211Isup2.hkl

e-71-000i8-Isup2.hkl (81.9KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211Isup3.cdx

2+ x y z x y z x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211fig1.tif

The coordination sphere around the Cd2+ cation with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, 1/2 – y, Inline graphic + z; (ii) –x, 1 – y, –z; (iii) 1 – x, −Inline graphic + y, 1/2 – z].

b . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015016904/wm5211fig2.tif

The three-dimensional framework structure of the title compound in a view along the b axis. Dashed lines indicate inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions.

CCDC reference: 1423357

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES