Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Sep 25;21(45):15947–15950. doi: 10.1002/chem.201503510

Sustainable Synthesis of Chiral Tetrahydrofurans through the Selective Dehydration of Pentoses

Robert W Foster [a], Christopher J Tame [b], Dejan-Krešimir Bučar [a], Helen C Hailes [a], Tom D Sheppard [a]
PMCID: PMC4648048  PMID: 26407081

Abstract

l-Arabinose is an abundant resource available as a waste product of the sugar beet industry. Through use of a hydrazone-based strategy, l-arabinose was selectively dehydrated to form a chiral tetrahydrofuran on a multi-gram scale without the need for protecting groups. This approach was extended to other biomass-derived reducing sugars and the mechanism of the key cyclization investigated. This methodology was applied to the synthesis of a range of functionalized chiral tetrahydrofurans, as well as a formal synthesis of 3R-3-hydroxymuscarine.

Keywords: arabinose, biomass, hydrazines, cyclization, tetrahydrofurans


The effective use of biomass, and in particular that generated as waste,[1] is essential to reduce the global dependence on petrochemical resources for the manufacture of valuable compounds, fuels and materials.[2] The majority of biomass is made up of carbohydrates, which are an abundant source of pentoses and hexoses.[3] For example, the refinement of sugar beet generates beet pulp as a major waste product, and this is a rich source of l-arabinose.[4] A variety of techniques has been developed to convert these biomass resources into valuable small molecules, such as the dehydration of pentoses under forcing acidic conditions to give furfural (Scheme 1), which can then be converted into various alcohols, alkenes, and heterocycles.[5] However, the majority of compounds prepared from pentoses and hexoses in this fashion are either achiral[6] or racemic mixtures where the stereochemistry of the chiral precursors is lost.[7] Using these products as intermediates in the synthesis of more complex targets may therefore require the reintroduction of stereocenters using asymmetric catalysis[8] or resolutions.[9]

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The preparation of furfural and THFs from biomass feedstock.

The tetrahydrofuran (THF) is a privileged scaffold within medicinal chemistry[10] and the stereoselective synthesis of chiral THFs has been a major area of recent research.[11] An attractive approach is to utilize the inherent chirality present in single isomer biomass-derived carbohydrates.[12] However, existing methods often require the selective conversion of a primary alcohol into an alkyl sulfonate or halide[13] and/or the use of protecting groups,[14] both of which are detrimental to the economy of a synthetic route.[15] Herein we describe the application of N,N-dimethylhydrazine[16] for the selective dehydration of biomass-derived reducing sugars to prepare chiral THFs under mildly acidic conditions (Scheme 1).[17]

Treating l-arabinose 1 a with N,N-dimethylhydrazine and Amberlyst® 15 acidic resin in methanol at room temperature gave hydrazone 2 a in 99 % yield (Table 1, entry 1). Stirring hydrazone 2 a in methanol at 40 °C for 16 h with 20 mol % TFA resulted in 100 % conversion of 2 a. Analysis of the crude 1H NMR spectrum indicated the formation of THF 3 a as a 75:25 mixture of diastereoisomers and purification by flash column chromatography gave a mixture of the two stereoisomers in 67 % yield. The reaction was scaled up from a 6.7 mmol scale to a 104 mmol scale without any significant drop in yield, giving 11.9 g of THF 3 a. The major diastereoisomer was isolated by recrystallization and the stereochemistry was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 1). Both steps were conducted in a sustainable solvent[18] (methanol) without the need for either pre-drying of the solvent or for a drying agent in the reaction.

Table 1.

Two-step synthesis of THFs 3 from sugars 1

Inline graphic
Entry Sugar1 Step 1yield [%] THF3[b] Step 2yield [%] d.r.[c]
1 Inline graphic 99 Inline graphic 67 (66)[d] 75:25
2 Inline graphic 98 Inline graphic 59 75:25
3 Inline graphic 98 Inline graphic 66 55:45
4 Inline graphic not isolated Inline graphic 61[e] 55:45
5 Inline graphic not isolated Inline graphic 57[e] 55:45
6 Inline graphic 99 Inline graphic 69 60:40

[a] Reagents and Conditions: NH2NMe2 (2.0 equiv), Amberlyst® 15, MeOH, 24 h, RT. [b] Reaction conducted on a 6.0–6.7 mmol scale unless otherwise stated. [c] Determined by analysis of the crude 1H NMR spectra. [d] Reaction conducted using 20.0 g (104 mmol) of hydrazone 2 a. [e] Yield over two steps from xylose.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ORTEP of the asymmetric unit in the crystal structure of hydrazone anti-3 a. The thermal ellipsoids are shown at a 50 % probability level. Only hydrogen atoms belonging to the cyclic core are shown for clarity.[19]

The same reaction conditions were used to prepare the enantiomeric THF ent-3 a from d-ribose (Table 1, entry 2) in a 58 % yield over two steps. It is noteworthy that the diastereoselectivity of this reaction was comparable with that observed for the cyclization of arabinose-derived hydrazone 2 a. The methodology was also extended to d-lyxose (Table 1, entry 3), with the corresponding hydrazone prepared in 98 % yield. The TFA-mediated cyclization step gave THF 3 b in 66 % yield as a 55:45 mixture of diastereoisomers. THF 3 b could also be prepared from d-xylose in 61 % yield over two steps, again as a 55:45 mixture of diastereoisomers (entry 4). This is a particularly important result as d-xylose is one of the major components of biomass.[3] Xylose is naturally available in both enantiomers and using l-xylose it was possible to access ent-3 b in a comparable yield (entry 5). The methodology was extended to deoxy sugar l-rhamnose, another constituent of sugar beet pulp, to give THF 3 c in 69 % yield as a 60:40 mixture of diastereoisomers (entry 6).

Recrystallization of hydrazone 3 a yielded the major anti-diastereoisomer in high purity. Reducing hydrazone anti-3 a using hydrogen, a palladium catalyst and Boc2O gave carbamate 4 in 60 % yield as a single stereoisomer (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Reduction of hydrazone anti-3 a.

Treatment of THF 3 a (d.r.=75:25) with Amberlyst® 15 acidic resin in water at room temperature resulted in rapid hydrolysis of the hydrazone to give hydrolyzed product 5 (Scheme 3).[20] Reduction of compound 5 with NaBH4 in methanol gave triol 6 as an 85:15 mixture of diastereoisomers in 98 % yield over two steps from hydrazone 3 a. Reductive amination of intermediate 5 using n-butylamine, acetic acid, and hydrogen/palladium, followed by trapping of the intermediate amine with Boc2O, gave carbamate 7 in 65 % yield from hydrazone 3 a as an 80:20 mixture of diastereoisomers. Compound 5 was also converted to alkene 8 using trimethyl phosphonoacetate in 73 % yield over two steps with excellent E-selectivity. Finally, treating compound 5 with Amberlyst® 15 in methanol resulted in the formation of dimethyl acetal 9 in 74 % yield over two steps from 3 a as a 65:35 mixture of stereoisomers.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Hydrolysis of hydrazones 3 and transformation into a range of THFs. Reagents and conditions; i) Amberlyst® 15, H2O, 5 min, RT; ii) NaBH4, MeOH, 1 h, 0 °C; iii) nBuNH2, AcOH, H2 (1 atm.), 10 % Pd/C, MeOH, 4 h, RT, then Boc2O, cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), 16 h, RT; iv) trimethyl phosphonoacetate, K2CO3, MeOH, 4 h 0 °C; v) Amberlyst® 15, MeOH, 48 h, RT.

The hydrolysis/reduction sequence was also applied to the hydrazones 3 b and 3 c, which gave the corresponding triols 10 and 11 in 90 % and 93 % yield respectively. l-Rhamnose-derived triol 11 is a late-stage intermediate in Fleet’s synthesis of 3R-3-hydroxymuscarine 12.[21] Triol 11 was previously prepared from l-rhamnose using stoichiometric bromine, trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride, and lithium aluminium hydride, so our route represents a less hazardous and more sustainable alternative.

A plausible reaction mechanism for the cyclization of hydrazone 2 a is proposed in Scheme 4. The N,N-dialkylhydrazone group of 2 a could promote the acid-mediated elimination of the adjacent hydroxyl to give vinyldiazenium intermediate 13.[22] Cyclization of this intermediate would give THF 3 a as either an anti- or syn-diastereoisomer. Resubmission of an isomerically pure sample of anti-3 a to the reaction conditions resulted in the same 75:25 mixture of anti- and syn-diastereoisomers that was observed in the original reaction, which suggests that the diastereoselectivity is under thermodynamic control. Conducting the reaction in [D4]MeOH did not result in detectable incorporation of deuterium adjacent to the hydrazone, indicating that epimerization occurs through a reversible ring closure rather than via a vinylhydrazine intermediate. The proposed mechanism is also consistent with the observation that hydrazones 2 a and 2 b converge to THF 3 a and ent-3 a with the same diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entries 1 and 2), as the two reactions would proceed through enantiomeric vinyldiazenium intermediates. Without TFA present no cyclization of 1 a was observed.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Postulated mechanism and mechanistic studies.

In a preliminary study, the extension of this approach to hexoses was explored (Scheme 5). Hydrazone 14, formed from d-galactose, was subjected to the TFA-mediated cyclization conditions. This gave a 60:40 mixture of THF 15 and tetrahydropyran 16 in 53 % isolated yield, with both heterocycles formed as single stereoisomers.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Extending the methodology to d-galactose.

In summary, we have developed an efficient multi-gram approach to low-molecular weight chiral molecules from biomass feedstock sources. This route allows access to a range of THF products without the need for protecting groups, including a formal synthesis of 3R-3-hydroxymuscarine. On the basis of experimental evidence, we have proposed a reaction mechanism for the key cyclization involving a vinyldiazenium intermediate.

Experimental Section

Experimental procedures, 1H and 13C NMR spectra, characterization data for all compounds and crystallographic data for anti-3 a are available in the Supporting Information.

A mixture of hydrazone 2 a (20.0 g, 104 mmol) in MeOH (210 mL, 0.5 m) was treated with TFA (1.5 mL, 2.4 g, 20 mol %) at room temperature and the reaction stirred at 40 °C for 16 h. The reaction was quenched with aq. sat. NaHCO3 and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude THF (anti:syn=75:25). This was purified by flash column chromatography (80:100 hexane:acetone) to give THF 3 a (11.9 g, 68.3 mmol, 66 %, anti:syn=75:25).

anti-3 a: Isolated as a single stereoisomer following recrystallization from boiling CPME; white crystalline solid; m.p.=65–67 °C; Rf=0.33 (1:1 acetone:hexane); νmax (film/cm−1) 3415 s br. 2875 s, 1586 s, 1467 s, 1445 s; 1H NMR (600 MHz; [D4]MeOH) 6.51 (1 H, d, J=6.6, N=CH), 4.23–4.18 (2 H, m, N=CHCH, CH2CH), 4.08 (1 H, dd, J=9.6, 4.9, OCHH′), 4.02 (1 H, dd, J=7.3, 5.1, N=CHCHCH), 3.76–3.72 (1 H, m, OCHH′), 2.79 (6 H, s, N(CH3)2); 13C NMR (150 MHz; [D4]MeOH) 135.6 (C=N), 82.5 (CHCH2), 76.5 (N=CHCHCH), 73.9 (OCH2), 72.4 (CH2CHCH), 42.8 (N(CH3)2); HRMS (EI+) found [M+H]+ 174.0979; C7H14N2O3 requires 174.0999; [α]D (20 °C)=+85.8 (anti-3 a, MeOH, C=1.4).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by GlaxoSmithKline and the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC Industrial CASE Award) and the UCL PhD program in Drug Discovery.

Supporting Information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

miscellaneous_information

chem0021-15947-sd1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Tuck CO, Pérez E, Horváth IT, Sheldon RA, Poliakoff M. Science. 2012;337:695–699. doi: 10.1126/science.1218930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2a.Huber GW, Corma A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:7184–7201. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angew. Chem. 2007;119 [Google Scholar]
  • 2b.Vennestrøm PNR, Osmundsen CM, Christensen CH, Taarning E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:10502–10509. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angew. Chem. 2011;123 [Google Scholar]
  • 2c.Zakzeski J, Bruijnincx PCA, Jongerius AL, Weckhuysen BM. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:3552–3599. doi: 10.1021/cr900354u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2d.He M, Sun Y, Han B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:9620–9633. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angew. Chem. 2013;125 [Google Scholar]
  • 2e.Gallezot P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1538–1558. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15147a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2f.Sanchez-Vazquez SA, Hailes HC, Evans JRG. Polym. Rev. 2013;53:627–694. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sheldon RA. Green Chem. 2014;16:950–963. [Google Scholar]
  • 4a.Bayashi M, Funane K, Ueyama H, Ohya S, Tanaka M, Kato Y. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1993;57:998–1000. [Google Scholar]
  • 4b.Kühnel S, Schols H, Gruppen H. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2011;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5a.Bozell JJ, Petersen GR. Green Chem. 2010;12:539–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 5b.Spagnuolo M, Crecchio C, Pizzigallo MD, Ruggiero P. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999;64:685–691. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19990920)64:6<685::aid-bit7>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li B, Varanasi S, Relue P. Green Chem. 2013;15:2149–2157. [Google Scholar]
  • 7a.Corma A, Iborra S, Velty A. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:2411–2502. doi: 10.1021/cr050989d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7b.Hu L, Zhao G, Hao W, Tang X, Sun Y, Lin L, Liu S. RSC Adv. 2012;2:11184–11206. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Koh PF, Wang P, Huang JM, Loh TP. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:8324–8327. doi: 10.1039/c4cc02645d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Srihari P, Sridhar Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011;2011:6690–6697. [Google Scholar]
  • 10a.Eron J., Jr The Lancet. 2006;368:476–482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69155-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10b.Hao J, Chen B, Yao Y, Hossain M, Nagatomo T, Yao H, Kong L, Sun H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;22:3441–3444. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10c.Jordheim LP, Durantel D, Zoulim F, Dumontet C. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2013;12:447–464. doi: 10.1038/nrd4010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10d.Dell′Isola A, McLachlan MMW, Neuman BW, Al-Mullah HMN, Binks AWD, Elvidge W, Shankland K, Cobb AJA. Chem. Eur. J. 2014;20:11685–11689. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11a.Asano K, Matsubara S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:16711–16713. doi: 10.1021/ja207322d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11b.Belmessieri D, de La Houpliere A, Calder EDD, Taylor JE, Smith AD. Chem. Eur. J. 2014;20:9762–9769. doi: 10.1002/chem.201402684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11c.Lee J, Panek JS. J. Org. Chem. 2015;80:2959–2971. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11d.Cox N, Uehling MR, Haelsig KT, Lalic G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:4878–4882. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angew. Chem. 2013;125 [Google Scholar]
  • 11e.Čorić I, Kim JH, Vlaar T, Patil M, Thiel W, List B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:3490–3493. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angew. Chem. 2013;125 [Google Scholar]
  • 12a.Tomczyk KM, Gunka PA, Parzuchowski PG, Zachara J, Rokicki G. Green Chem. 2012;14:1749–1758. [Google Scholar]
  • 12b.Kamimura A, Murata K, Tanaka Y, Okagawa T, Matsumoto H, Kaiso K, Yoshimoto M. ChemSusChem. 2014;7:3257–3259. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201402655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12c.Adduci LL, Bender TA, Dabrowski JA, Gagné MR. Nat. Chem. 2015;7:576–581. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12d.Drosos N, Morandi B. Angew. Chem. 2015;127:8938–8942. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54 [Google Scholar]
  • 13a.Cifonelli M, Cifonelli JA, Montgomery R, Smith F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955;77:121–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 13b.Lundt I, Frank H. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:13285–13298. [Google Scholar]
  • 13c.Leung LMH, Gibson V, Linclau B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2005;16:2449–2453. [Google Scholar]
  • 13d.Choi S-MS, Myerscough PM, Fairbanks AJ, Skead BM, Bichard CJF, Mantell SJ, Son JC, Fleet GWJ, Saunders J, Brown D. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1992:1605–1607. [Google Scholar]
  • 14a.Ewing GJ, Robins MJ. Org. Lett. 1999;1:635–636. [Google Scholar]
  • 14b.Rolf D, Gray GR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:3539–3541. [Google Scholar]
  • 15a.Saloranta T, Leino R. Synlett. 2015;26:421–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 15b.Young IS, Baran PS. Nat. Chem. 2009;1:193–205. doi: 10.1038/nchem.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lazny R, Nodzewska A. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:1386–1434. doi: 10.1021/cr900067y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17a.KoóŠ M, Moscher HS. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1985;50:1994–1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 17b.Behforouz M, Bolan JL, Flynt MS. J. Org. Chem. 1985;50:1186–1189. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Henderson RK, Jimenez-Gonzalez C, Constable DJC, Alston SR, Inglis GGA, Fisher G, Sherwood J, Binks SP, Curzons AD. Green Chem. 2011;13:854–862. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. CCDC 1411520 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.
  • 20. In deuterium oxide compound 546 existed as an 85:15 mixture of hydrates, with a structure analogous to that drawn in Scheme 4 (accounting for deuterium exchange) However NMR spectra in [D ]MeOH and [D ]DMSO indicated a more complex mixture of compounds, possibly as a result of reversible oligomerization. See the Supporting Information for details.
  • 21.Mantell SJ, Ford PS, Watkin DJ, Fleet GWJ, Brown D. Tetrahedron. 1993;49:3343–3358. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lichtenthaler FW, Weimer T, Immel S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2004;15:2703–2709. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

miscellaneous_information

chem0021-15947-sd1.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES