Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Jul 14;5:12309. doi: 10.1038/srep12309

Electron—phonon Coupling and the Superconducting Phase Diagram of the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 Interface

Hans Boschker 1,a, Christoph Richter 1,2, Evangelos Fillis-Tsirakis 1, Christof W Schneider 3, Jochen Mannhart 1
PMCID: PMC4648410  PMID: 26169351

Abstract

The superconductor at the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 interface provides a model system for the study of two-dimensional superconductivity in the dilute carrier density limit. Here we experimentally address the pairing mechanism in this superconductor. We extract the electron—phonon spectral function from tunneling spectra and conclude, without ruling out contributions of further pairing channels, that electron—phonon mediated pairing is strong enough to account for the superconducting critical temperatures. Furthermore, we discuss the electron—phonon coupling in relation to the superconducting phase diagram. The electron—phonon spectral function is independent of the carrier density, except for a small part of the phase diagram in the underdoped region. The tunneling measurements reveal that the increase of the chemical potential with increasing carrier density levels off and is zero in the overdoped region of the phase diagram. This indicates that the additionally induced carriers do not populate the band that hosts the superconducting state and that the superconducting order parameter therefore is weakened by the presence of charge carriers in another band.

Interface superconductors are model systems for superconductivity in reduced dimensions1 and provide input to the long-standing problem of understanding the mechanism of superconductivity in the layered cuprate superconductors. A prominent example is the superconductor at the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 interface2,3,4. In this two-dimensional electron liquid (2DEL), superconductivity coexists with ferromagnetism5,6,7 and spin-orbit coupling8,9, providing the ingredients for exotic superconducting states such as finite momentum pairing10,11. Regarding the pairing mechanism, both conventional electron—phonon coupling and electronic pairing mechanisms are being considered12,13,14. We recently mapped out the superconducting gap across the phase diagram and obtained a picture qualitatively similar to the phase diagram of the high-Tc-cuprate superconductors: in the underdoped region the gap increases with charge carrier depletion15. This similarity between the doping dependence of the superconducting gap of LaAlO3—SrTiO3 and the high-Tc-cuprates makes understanding the pairing mechanism in LaAlO3—SrTiO3 even more relevant. No experimental study of the pairing interaction exists, however.

The LaAlO3—SrTiO3 interface 2DEL differs from the electron system in doped SrTiO3 because the band structures of the systems are different. But the critical temperatures are in the same range and it may well be that the pairing mechanism is the same. The superconductivity in doped SrTiO316 is generally explained in terms of the Bardeen Cooper Schrieffer (BCS) theory. Different phonon modes can contribute to the pairing interaction and the relative contributions of the different modes are still a topic of discussion17,18,19,20,21. The critical temperature Tc of doped SrTiO3 has a dome-shaped dependence on the carrier density n, with a maximum Tc (400–600 mK) at an extremely small carrier density of ~1019 cm−3 22,23,24. According to the BCS theory, the Tc of a superconductor depends on the Fermi surface area and on the electron—phonon coupling strength. As doped SrTiO3 has a small Fermi surface area, it follows that the electron—phonon coupling would need to be exceptionally strong to explain superconductivity at such a small carrier density. Strong electron—phonon coupling is indeed possible because the Fermi energy and the plasma edge are smaller than some of the SrTiO3 phonon energies (predominantly the fourth longitudinal optical mode LO4 at ~100 meV) involved. Therefore plasma excitations cannot screen these phonons well, yielding strong electron—phonon coupling, as observed in tunneling experiments25,26. At n > 5·1019 cm−3, however, the plasma edge energy exceeds 100 meV, so that screening becomes more effective and the electron—phonon coupling is reduced. This mechanism has been proposed to explain the reduction of Tc of doped SrTiO3 in the overdoped regime20. Furthermore, the SrTiO3 longitudinal optical phonon modes have also been suggested to be important for the superconductivity in FeSe monolayers on SrTiO327.

To shed light into the pairing mechanism of the superconducting phase at the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 interface we have performed tunnel experiments to spectroscopically measure the electron—phonon coupling α2F(ω) at the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 interface. We observe coupling to the SrTiO3 LO modes and not to other modes. Therefore the LO phonons are the likely candidate for providing the pairing interaction. We measured the evolution of both the chemical potential and the electron—phonon spectral function across the superconducting dome. The electron—phonon spectral function is found to only depend on the carrier density in the underdoped region. In the overdoped region the chemical potential is surprisingly constant. It is concluded that with increased doping the additionally induced charge carriers reside in a band that does not contribute to the pairing. Instead, the additional carriers result in Coulomb scattering of the electrons in the superconducting band, thereby reducing the superconducting gap.

Results

Figure 1 presents the differential conductance characteristic dI/dV (V) of a typical LaAlO3—SrTiO3 tunnel junction at T = 4.2 K. Here I is the tunnel current and V is the voltage applied between the 2DEL and the Au counterelectrode. The polarity of the voltage characterizes the sign of the interface voltage with respect to the top electrode bias; for V < 0 electrons tunnel out of the 2DEL. The tunnel characteristics are asymmetric, with a large tunnel conductance for V > 0 and a relatively small tunnel conductance for V < 0. At voltages well below the barrier height, the differential conductance of a tunnel junction is proportional to the density of states in the electrodes. Because the density of states of the Au electrode does not change significantly with energy, the dI/dV (V) characteristic reflects the density of states of the 2DEL and the inelastic tunneling processes. Close to the conduction band edge of the 2DEL, the 2DEL density of states is strongly energy-dependent. When the absolute value of the negative voltage exceeds the chemical potential μ, the differential conductance is expected to almost vanish, as the tunnel conductance then probes the density of states in the bandgap. Here μ is defined with respect to the band edge, so at V = 0 V the 2DEL density of states at energy E = μ is probed. The differential conductance rapidly decreases for V < 0 and a minimum is observed at V = −30 mV (Fig. 1). We identify this minimum with the conduction-band edge and attribute the increase of the conductance at larger negative bias voltages to inelastic tunneling processes and to barrier effects. In this part of the characteristic two prominent peaks are present, at V ≈ −60 mV and V ≈ −100 mV.

Figure 1. dI/dV (V) tunneling characteristic measured at T = 4.2 K.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The dashed green line separates the voltage ranges where elastic and inelastic tunneling dominate in the transport. For V > 0 electrons tunnel from the Au electrode into unoccupied states in the 2DEL and for V < 0 electrons tunnel from the 2DEL into the Au. In the inelastic tunneling regime, the transport is mainly by phonon—assisted tunneling with SrTiO3 phonon modes. This process is illustrated in the density of states versus energy diagram (DOS(E)) of the junction in the inset, here the density of states of Au is shown on the left, that of the 2DEL on the right. If driven by voltages so large that their energy exceed phonon energies, electrons in the occupied states of the 2DEL (blue area) tunnel directly into the Au or they first make a transition to a virtual state in the gap by emitting a phonon (dashed blue area) and then transfer into the Au. Note that the linear form of the DOS(E) shown in the schematic is not the actual DOS(E) of the 2DEL.

To analyze the origin of the peaks in the inelastic tunneling conductance, the second derivative of the I(V) characteristics is analyzed, as the peaks in the second derivative correspond to the energies of the interacting boson modes28. Figure 2 presents the –d2I/dV2(V) characteristics of seven tunnel junctions on different samples. Five of the samples were fabricated with standard LaAlO3—SrTiO3 interfaces, while sample T6 was fabricated using a SrTi18O3 substrate. The five standard samples have very similar characteristics, the peaks being at identical voltages. The four LO phonon modes of SrTiO3 are at energies of 19.8, 33.0, 58.8 and 98.6 meV (measured at room temperature)29,30,31,32,33. At the energies of the LO2, LO3 and LO4 modes we indeed observe peaks in the –d2I/dV2(V) characteristics. The LO1 mode is not directly observed. Additional peaks are observed at, e.g., 77.9, 157.5, and 196.2 mV. These can be identified as harmonics of the phonon energies, LO1 + LO3, LO3 + LO4, and twice LO4, respectively. The phonon energies extracted from the tunneling data are in good agreement with those observed by hyper-Raman measurements33, as listed in Table 1. The small difference originates presumably from the different measurement temperatures. One sample was grown using a SrTi18O3 single crystal34. In this oxygen—isotope substituted sample, small shifts of the phonon energies can be expected. We observed a shift of 3.2 meV towards lower energy in the LO4 mode. The other modes are shifted by less than 1 meV. The isotope effect is stronger for the LO4 mode as this mode involves large displacements of the oxygen ions. Because similar shifts have been observed in Raman measurements on SrTi18O3 (not shown), a significant fraction of 18O (larger than 60%) has to be present in the interfacial region of the sample, even after the LaAlO3 growth and annealing in a 16O environment.

Figure 2. The second derivative –d2I/dV2(V) characteristics of tunnel junctions showing phonon—assisted tunneling.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The data were normalized to a maximum of 1 and offset by multiples of 0.5. Samples T1, T2, T3, T4 and T6 have a 4 unit cell thick LaAlO3 layer, while sample T5 has a five unit cell thick layer. The colored solid lines mark the energies of the LO phonon modes. Dashed lines mark sums and harmonics of these energies with the same color code. The two devices on the LaAlO3—SrTi18O3 sample are referred to by T6a and T6b.

Table 1. The energies of the longitudinal optical phonon modes of SrTiO 3 as observed by hyper-Raman scattering33, and the present tunneling spectroscopy.

Phonon mode Hyper-Raman Tunneling -d2I/dV2 Tunneling α2F(ω)
LO1 (19.8 meV) (18.5 meV) (19.0 meV)
LO2 33.0 meV 33.5 meV 35.0 meV
LO3 58.8 meV 59.4 meV 60.4 meV
LO4 98.6 meV 98.1 meV 99.3 meV
Open in a new tab

The Raman data were taken at 300 K and the tunneling data were taken below 4.2 K. The numbers in parentheses indicate indirect measurements, derived from higher order processes.

Having shown that electron—phonon coupling can be directly observed in the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 tunnel junctions, we now discuss its relation to superconductivity. We measured the gate-voltage dependence of the phonon—assisted tunneling in a device for which we previously determined the superconducting phase diagram15. A positive (negative) gate voltage accumulates carriers at (depletes carriers from) the 2DEL. Optimum doping with maximum Tc is achieved at VG = 0 V. At positive (negative) gate bias the system is overdoped (underdoped). Here Tc is defined as the temperature at which the resistive superconducting transition is observed. The gate-voltage dependence of the tunnel characteristics is presented in Fig. 3. For positive gate voltages the characteristics are not affected by VG. Negative gate voltages, however, decrease the tunnel conductance significantly. This decrease is due to a change in the chemical potential μ that reduces the occupied density of states in the 2DEL. To precisely determine the gate-voltage dependence of μ, we analyzed the shifts in voltage in the conductance curves at positive voltages, see Fig. 4. These shifts are constant over a large voltage range and can be used to accurately determine Δμ, the change in chemical potential in comparison to the overdoped cases. We determine μ for VG > 50 V by finding the crossing point between the almost constant conductance in the range −55 < V < −35 mV (mostly inelastic tunneling) and the strongly voltage dependence conductance in the range −25 < V < 0 mV (elastic tunneling). This yields μ = 30 ± 2 mV, in good agreement with the data in Fig. 1. The tunneling spectra in Fig. 3 show a small reduction of the conductance close to the Fermi energy at V > −3 mV. In related cases, this reduction is attributed to the Altshuler—Aronov correction to the density of states of an electron system with electron—electron interactions35. A detailed analysis of the Altshuler—Aronov correction is beyond the scope of this article. The most important observation is that the phonon—assisted tunneling peaks are consistently observed for all gate voltages.

Figure 3. Gate-voltage dependence of the phonon—assisted tunneling.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The tunneling characteristics dI/dV(V) were measured at 0.05 K.

Figure 4. Gate voltage-dependent conductance characteristics at positive voltages, measured at 0.05 K.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The shift in voltage in these characteristics was used to determine the change in chemical potential Δμ that is shown in the inset.

For quantitative analysis of the electron—phonon coupling, the inelastic tunneling probability has to be evaluated at the different energies. In the case of tunneling with the emission of real phonons studied here (as opposed to the case of the virtual phonon—coupling induced self-energy correction studied in superconducting tunnel junctions36), the tunneling probability is proportional to α2F(ω)37,38,39. The tunneling conductance is a function of both the density of states and the inelastic tunneling probability. The observed shape of the inelastic tunneling peaks is due to a convolution of the electron—phonon spectral function with the occupied density of states of the 2DEL. Because the voltage range in which elastic tunneling occurs (V > −μ/e) and the voltage range in which inelastic tunneling occurs (V < −μ/e) are separated in energy, we have experimental access to the occupied density of states of the 2DEL. Here e is the electron charge. We therefore deconvoluted the density of occupied states (as measured by elastic tunneling in the voltage range −μ/e < V < 0) from the inelastic tunneling conductance (see Methods). This procedure yields a function proportional to the electron—phonon spectral function, which is shown in Fig. 5. The magnitude of the function has been normalized such that α2F (ω)·dω reflects the ratio of the inelastic tunneling transmission in an energy range dω around ω and the total elastic tunnel transmission. The dominant features of α2F (ω) are the strong coupling at the LO3 (~60 meV) and LO4 (~100 meV) phonon modes. The phonon energies obtained from α2F (ω), see Table 1, are are in good agreement with those obtained from the peaks in –d2I/dV2(V). Next to the peaks from the phonons, a background that increases with increasing energy is present. In tunneling, the barrier height decreases with increasing voltage and therefore some additional elastic tunneling is also present at voltages V < −μ/e. The deconvolution procedure ignores this and the elastic part of the tunneling conductance results in the background. The α2F (ω) function is unaffected by the gate voltage, except for an overall increase at negative gate voltages.

Figure 5. The electron—phonon spectral function α2F(ω) as calculated from the dI/dV(V) data in Fig. 3.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Each curve has been offset for clarity. Vertical lines identify the energies of the LO2, LO3 and LO4 modes. These energies do not depend on the gate voltage.

Discussion

The main objective of our study is to identify the pairing mechanism of the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 2DEL by measuring the coupling of the electrons to bosonic modes with inelastic tunneling spectroscopy. Up to energies of 200 meV we find only coupling to the LO phonons of SrTiO3. The phonon—assisted tunneling conductance in the 2DEL junctions is significantly larger than that observed in, e.g., Pb junctions37,38,40 and is of similar magnitude as that observed in doped SrTiO3 junctions25,26. This indicates that the electron—phonon scattering crosssection is large. The measurements yield α2F (ω) with an unknown proportionality constant and we therefore cannot calculate the critical temperature. So, the results are not unambiguous proof that the LO phonons do provide the pairing mechanism. Because we observe coupling to the LO phonons and do not observe coupling to other modes, we have to conclude, however, that these tunnel spectroscopy measurements point clearly to electron—phonon coupling as the pairing channel. Note that next to the observed coupling to the LO phonons, coupling to the acoustic phonons may be present as well, as discussed for example in ref. 12. Our measurements namely do not discriminate coupling to acoustic phonons modes from the elastic tunneling conductance if the bosonic spectral function is not strongly energy-dependent.

We next discuss the gate-voltage dependence of the electron—phonon coupling. The coupling strength is characterized by the McMillan parameter λ that is obtained from α2F (ω) by41

graphic file with name srep12309-m1.jpg

We extracted λ from the data in Fig. 5 by integrating equation (1) over the energy range 30 < E < 145 meV. The resulting values for λ are presented in Fig. 6a, where they have been normalized to those in the overdoped region. Approximately 60% of the coupling is due to the LO4 mode and approximately 25% of the coupling is due to the LO3 mode, independent of VG. The doping dependence of λ can be compared to that of the previously determined Tgap values, the temperatures at which the superconducting gap closes. We note that the gate-voltage dependence of Tgap is different from that of Tc (Fig. 6c). λ is constant for VG > −50 V and increases with decreasing carrier density in the underdoped region of the phase diagram. In the underdoped region of the superconducting phase diagram, the increase of λ with decreasing carrier concentration is qualitatively consistent with the increase of Tgap. However, in the main part of the phase diagram Tgap depends strongly on the applied gate voltage and λ is constant. The decrease of Tgap in the optimally doped and overdoped region is therefore puzzling. In the following we show that this decrease can be directly understood by considering the band structure of the 2DEL.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Gate voltage dependence of a) λ, b) μ and c) Tgap and Tc. The values for λ are normalized to those in the overdoped region. In the underdoped region (brown background) the doping dependence of Tgap coincides with a change in λ. In the optimally doped and overdoped regions (blue background) the reduction of Tgap coincides with a lack of increase of μ with increasing carrier density, indicating the additional charge carriers do not reside in the band that is superconducting, but interfere. The error margins of λ reflect the uncertainty in the background subtraction procedure. The values for Tgap and Tc are taken from an earlier publication15.

Density functional theory calculations9,42,43, transport properties44,45 and recent angle-resolved-photoemission (ARPES) data46 indicate that the 2DEL comprises several bands: small electron mass dxy orbital derived bands and large electron mass dxz and dyz orbital derived bands. Because the dxz and dyz orbital derived bands have larger momenta in the tunnel direction, tunneling occurs predominantly to those bands. This is consistent with the band structure determined from ARPES measurements46: the bottom of the dxz and dyz orbital derived bands lies approximately 50 meV below the Fermi energy, in reasonable agreement with the μ = 30 mV observed in tunneling. The bottom of the dxy orbital derived bands lies approximately 300 meV below the Fermi energy. Because the superconducting gap is observed in the tunneling characteristics with the temperature dependence of a primary order parameter15, we conclude that the dxz and dyz orbital derived bands host the dominant contribution to the superconductivity.

Figure 6b presents the gate voltage dependence of the chemical potential in these bands. In the underdoped region μ steadily increases with increasing carrier density, as expected. However, at optimal doping the increase of μ levels off and μ is almost constant in the entire overdoped region. Because the shape of the tunneling characteristic is virtually independent of VG, the additionally induced charge carriers have to reside in one or several higher-energy bands with large density of states that are not accessible to the tunneling, such as in a dxy orbital derived band or in a band further away from the interface. In agreement with this conclusion, signatures of such a band have been observed in transport studies45, exactly appearing at gate voltages larger than the one at optimum Tc (see also the Hall effect data in references47,48). The charge carriers in this additional band are presumably not superconducting (or only superconducting due to the proximity effect from the other bands), but will provide more Coulomb scattering to the electrons in the superconducting bands, thereby explaining the reduction of superconductivity in the overdoped region. Electronic phase separation in superconducting and non-superconducting regions could also explain the doping independence of μ, but in this scenario the density of states is expected to change with doping, contrary to the measurements.

In summary, we performed tunneling experiments to identify the superconducting pairing mechanism in the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 2DEL. We determined α2F (ω) and observed electron—phonon coupling across the entire superconducting phase diagram. We only observed coupling to the LO phonons of SrTiO3 and the coupling to the LO4 mode was measured to be particularly pronounced. We conclude that electron—phonon coupling likely provides the pairing mechanism for the superconductivity. In the underdoped region the decrease of Tgap with increasing carrier density is possibly explained by a reduction of the electron—phonon coupling strength, but in the optimally doped and overdoped regions the electron—phonon coupling is doping-independent. In these regions an additional band becomes populated, as evidenced by tunneling measurements of the chemical potential in the 2DEL. The charge carriers in this band result in additional Coulomb scattering and thereby weaken the superconductivity, causing the reduction of Tgap. This scenario is intriguingly similar to the reduction of Tc in overdoped gate-tuned MoS249,50 and to the constant chemical potential observed in cuprate interface superconductors51.

Methods

Experimental

The tunnel junctions were fabricated by first growing a 4 or 5 unit cell thick layer of LaAlO3 on TiO2 terminated52 SrTiO3 by pulsed laser deposition to create the 2DEL53. Then a gold top electrode was deposited on the LaAlO3 in situ. The gold layer was patterned using standard photolithography and selective chemical etching with a KI + I2 solution. In a final processing step ohmic contacts to the electron system were made by argon ion milling and Ti sputtering. The device area ranges from 0.2 to 1 mm2. The fabrication and characterization of the devices is described in more detail elsewhere15. We fabricated devices using both SrTi16O3 and SrTi18O334 single crystals. We did not see an effect of the oxygen isotope exchange on the normal-state transport properties or on the superconducting properties of the 2DEL.

Extracting the electron—phonon spectral function

In superconducting tunnel junctions, the self-energy correction to the BCS density of states due to the electron—phonon coupling can be directly observed and quantitatively modeled using the Eliashberg theory. In the LaAlO3—SrTiO3 2DEL this does not work because the self-energy correction is not observed. The phonon—assisted tunnel spectra are identical in the superconducting and normal state (not shown) because the superconducting gap (~50 μeV) is much smaller than the phonon energies involved. Therefore the normal state density of states has to be used to quantify the electron—phonon coupling. In normal metal phonon—assisted tunneling, the inelastic part of the tunneling conductance is a convolution of the electron—phonon spectral function and the density of states of the electron system.

graphic file with name srep12309-m2.jpg

where gi is the inelastic conductance, K is a constant and Nocc(E) is the occupied density of states. In case the density of states is constant in the energy range of interest, Nocc is the heaviside step function. Then the derivative of equation (2) with respect to the energy yields the proportionality between dgi(E)/dE and α2F(ω). This relation is generally used in inelastic tunneling spectroscopy28,37,38,39. In case the density of states is not constant, changes in gi(E) are either due to changes in α2F(ω) or to changes in Nocc(E). When Nocc(E) is known, α2F(ω) can be extracted from gi(E) with the procedure described in the following. A discrete version of Eq. (2) can be written as

graphic file with name srep12309-m3.jpg

Here ΔE is the step size in energy. The summation is cut off after τ = μ because the density of states is zero at larger energies. We identify the tunnel conductance in the range −μ/e < V < 0 as Nocc(E) and the tunnel conductance in the range V < −μ/e as gi(E). Now gi(μ + ΔE) can be used to determine α2F(μ + ΔE), because α2F(E) is assumed to be zero for E < μ. Following this, α2F(μ + 2ΔE) can be obtained. The procedure works best when the tunnel conductance at E = μ is zero, giving a clear separation between density of states and inelastic tunneling. If this is not the case, a large spike will result in α2F(E) at E = μ + ΔE. This spike can be removed by adjusting a constant value for α2F(E) for E < μ.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Boschker, H. et al. Electron-phonon Coupling and the Superconducting Phase Diagram of the LaAlO3-SrTiO3 Interface. Sci. Rep. 5, 12309; doi: 10.1038/srep12309 (2015).

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Brinkman, P. Hirschfeld, P. Horsch, J. R. Kirtley, T. Kopp, F. Loder, K. A. Moler, N. Pavlenko and J.-M. Triscone for valuable discussions.

Footnotes

Author Contributions H.B. and J.M. conceived the experiment. C.R. fabricated the tunnel junctions. C.R., H.B. and E.F.-T. performed the measurements and analyzed the data. C.S. performed the oxygen isotope exchange. J.M. supervised the research. H.B. wrote the manuscript with help from all other authors.

References

  1. Pereiro J., Petrovic A., Panagopoulos C. & Božović I. Interface superconductivity: history, development and prospects. Phys. Express 1, 208 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  2. Ohtomo A. & Hwang H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature 427, 423–426 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Reyren N. et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science 317, 1196–1199 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caviglia A. D. et al. Electric field control of the LaAlO(3)/SrTiO(3) interface ground state. Nature 456, 624–627 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Li L., Richter C., Mannhart J. & Ashoori R. C. Coexistence of magnetic order and two-dimensional superconductivity at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces. Nature Phys. 7, 762–766 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. Bert J. A. et al. Direct imaging of the coexistence of ferromagnetism and superconductivity at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nature Phys. 7, 767–771 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. Dikin D. A. et al. Coexistence of Superconductivity and Ferromagnetism in Two Dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 056802 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caviglia A. D. et al. Tunable Rashba Spin-Orbit Interaction at Oxide Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 126803 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhong Z., Tóth A. & Held K. Theory of spin-orbit coupling at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces and SrTiO3 surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 87, 161102 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. Michaeli K., Potter A. C. & Lee P. A. Superconducting and Ferromagnetic Phases in SrTiO3/LaAlO3 Oxide Interface Structures: Possibility of Finite Momentum Pairing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 117003 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Loder F., Kampf A. P. & Kopp T. Superconductivity with Rashba spin—orbit coupling and magnetic field. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 362201 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klimin S. N., Tempere J., Devreese J. T. & van der Marel D. Interface superconductivity in LaAlO3-SrTiO3 heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 89, 184514 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. Stephanos C., Kopp T., Mannhart J. & Hirschfeld P. J. Interface-induced d-wave pairing. Phys. Rev. B 84, 100510 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. Scheurer M. S. & Schmalian J. Topological superconductivity and unconventional pairing in oxide interfaces. Nature Commun. 6, 6005 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richter C. et al. Interface superconductor with gap behaviour like a high-temperature superconductor. Nature 502, 528–531 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schooley J. F., Hosler W. R. & Cohen M. L. Superconductivity in semiconducting SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 474 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  17. Appel J. Soft-mode superconductivity in SrTiO3-x. Phys. Rev. 180, 508-& (1969). [Google Scholar]
  18. Ngai K. L. 2-Phonon deformation potential and superconductivity in degenerate semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 215–218 (1974). [Google Scholar]
  19. Takada Y. Theory of superconductivity in polar semiconductors and its application to n-type semiconducting SrTiO3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 49, 1267–1275 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  20. Baratoff A. & Binnig G. Mechanism of Superconductivity in SrTi03. Phys. B & C 108, 1335–1336 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  21. Klimin S. N., Tempere J., van der Marel D. & Devreese J. T. Microscopic mechanisms for the Fermi-liquid behavior of Nb-doped strontium titanate. Phys. Rev. B 86, 045113 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. Koonce C. S., Cohen M. L., Schooley J. F., Hosler W. R. & Pfeiffer E. R. Superconducting transition temperatures of semiconducting SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. 163, 380-& (1967). [Google Scholar]
  23. Pfeiffer E. & Schooley J. Superconducting transition temperatures of Nb-doped SrTiO3. Phys. Lett. A 29, 589–590 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin X. et al. Critical Doping for the Onset of a Two-Band Superconducting Ground State in SrTiO3-delta. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 207002 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  25. Sroubek Z. Electron tunneling in indium-SrTiO3:Nb Schottky barriers. Solid State Commun. 7, 1561–1564 (1969). [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayashi S., Aoki R. & Ohta T. Tunneling Spectroscopy in In-SrTiO3-x Contact. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 50, 2619–2624 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee J. J. et al. Interfacial mode coupling as the origin of the enhancement of Tc in FeSe films on SrTiO3. Nature 515, 245–248 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolf E. L. in Principles of electron tunneling spectroscopy 2nd edn. (Oxford Science Publishing, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  29. Spitzer W. G., Miller R. C., Kleinman D. A. & Howarth L. E. Far Infrared Dielectric Dispersion in BaTiO3, SrTiO3, and TiO2. Phys. Rev. 126, 1710 (1962). [Google Scholar]
  30. Cowley R. A. Lattice Dynamics and Phase Transitions of Strontium Titanate. Phys. Rev. 134, A981–A997 (1964). [Google Scholar]
  31. Frederikse H. P. R. & Hosler W. R. Hall mobility in SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. 161, 822 (1967). [Google Scholar]
  32. Servoin J. L., Luspin Y. & Gervais F. Infrared dispersion in SrTiO3 at high temperature. Phys. Rev. B 22, 5501–5506 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  33. Vogt H. Hyper-Raman tensors of the zone-center optical phonons in SrTiO3 and KTaO3. Phys. Rev. B 38, 5699–5708 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schneider C. W. et al. The origin of oxygen in oxide thin films: Role of the substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 192107 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  35. Altshuler B. & Aronov A. Zero bias anomaly in tunnel resistance and electron-electron interaction. Solid State Commun. 30, 115–117 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  36. McMillan W. L. & Rowell J. M. Lead Phonon Spectrum Calculated from Superconducting Density of States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 108–112 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  37. Adler J. G., Kreuzer H. J. & Wattamaniuk W. J. Multichannel Theory of Inelastic Electron Tunneling in Normal Metal-Insulator-Metal Junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 185–187 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  38. Schackert M. et al. Local Measurement of the Eliashberg Function of Pb Islands: Enhancement of Electron-Phonon Coupling by Quantum Well States. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 047002 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jandke J., Hlobil P., Schackert M., Wulfhekel W. & Schmalian J. Coupling to real and virtual phonons in tunneling spectroscopy of superconductors. arXiv:1504.01932v1 (2015).
  40. Dynes R. C. & Rowell J. M. Influence of electrons-per-atom ratio and phonon frequencies on the superconducting transition temperature of lead alloys. Phys. Rev. B 11, 1884–1894 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  41. McMillan W. L. Transition Temperature of Strong-Coupled Superconductors. Phys. Rev. 167, 331–344 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  42. Popović Z. S., Satpathy S. & Martin R. M. Origin of the Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Carrier Density at the LaAlO3 on SrTiO3 Interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 256801 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Son W.-J., Cho E., Lee B., Lee J. & Han S. Density and spatial distribution of charge carriers in the intrinsic n-type LaAlO3-SrTiO3 interface. Phys. Rev. B 79, 245411 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  44. Pentcheva R. et al. Parallel Electron-Hole Bilayer Conductivity from Electronic Interface Reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 166804 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Joshua A., Pecker S., Ruhman J., Altman E. & Ilani S. A universal critical density underlying the physics of electrons at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nature Commun. 3, 1129 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Berner G. et al. Direct k-Space Mapping of the Electronic Structure in an Oxide-Oxide Interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 247601 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bell C. et al. Dominant Mobility Modulation by the Electric Field Effect at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 226802 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Herranz G. et al. Engineering two-dimensional superconductivity and Rashba spin-orbit coupling in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 quantum wells by selective orbital occupancy. Nature Commun. 6, 6028 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ye J. T. et al. Superconducting Dome in a Gate-Tuned Band Insulator. Science 338, 1193–1196 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Das T. & Dolui K. Quasiparticle-Phonon Coupling Mediated Superconducting Dome in MoS2 and TiSe2. Phys. Rev. B 91, 094510 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu J. et al. Anomalous independence of interface superconductivity from carrier density. Nature Mater 12, 877–881 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Koster G., Kropman B. L., Rijnders G. J. H. M., Blank D. H. A. & Rogalla H. Quasi-ideal strontium titanate crystal surfaces through formation of strontium hydroxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2920–2922 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  53. Thiel S., Hammerl G., Schmehl A., Schneider C. W. & Mannhart J. Tunable quasi-two-dimensional electron gases in oxide heterostructures. Science 313, 1942–1945 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES