Abstract
Background
Natural killer (NK) cells in the upper respiratory airways are not well characterized. In the current study, we sought to characterize and functionally assess murine nasal NK cells.
Methods
Using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry, we compared the nasal NK cells of Ncr1 GFP/+ knock-in mice, whose NK cells produced green fluorescent protein, with their splenic and pulmonary counterparts. In addition, we functionally analyzed the nasal NK cells of these mice in vitro. To assess the in vivo functions of nasal NK cells, C57BL/6 mice depleted of NK cells after treatment with PK136 antibody were nasally infected with influenza virus PR8.
Results
Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the presence of NK cells in the lamina propria of nasal mucosa, and flow cytometry showed that these cells were of NK cell lineage. The expression patterns of Ly49 receptor, CD11b/CD27, CD62L and CD69 revealed that nasal NK cells had an immature and activated phenotype compared with that of their splenic and pulmonary counterparts. Effector functions including degranulation and IFN(interferon)-γ production after in vitro stimulation with phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate plus ionomycin or IL(interleukin)-12 plus IL-18 were dampened in nasal NK cells, and the depletion of NK cells led to an increased influenza virus titer in nasal passages.
Conclusions
The NK cells of the murine nasal passage belong to the conventional NK cell linage and characteristically demonstrate an immature and activated phenotype. Despite their hyporesponsiveness in vitro, nasal NK cells play important roles in the host defense against nasal influenza virus infection.
Introduction
Natural killer (NK) cells play important roles in host immune defense and have anti-tumor activity: they produce cytotoxic granules containing molecules such as perforins and granzymes to lyse infected or neoplastic cells [1]. Other important features of NK cells are their involvement in innate immune responses, including the production of cytokines including interferons (IFNs), their enhancement of local immune responses by directly acting on target cells, and their roles in the recruitment and activation of immune cells, including T cells and macrophages [1].
NK cells were previously considered to be a uniform population of cells with cytotoxic and cytokine-producing activities [1]. However, recent evidence regarding the surface marker expression and functional properties of NK cells has revealed their heterogeneity [2]. For example, the expression of CD27 and CD11b can be used to discriminate murine NK cells according to their maturation level [3, 4]. For example, CD11clowB220+ IFN-producing cells were originally considered to be killer dendritic cells but are now known to be activated NK cells that can produce various IFNs [4, 5]. These and similar investigations of mucosal NK cells helped to establish the concept of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) [6].
ILCs, including NK cells, lack specific antigen receptors but can produce several effector cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ and interleukin(IL)-13), in response to stimuli such as infection and tissue damage [6]. In addition, ILCs contribute to the induction of lymphoid tissue organogenesis, homeostasis, and tissue repair [6]. For example, a subset of ILCs found in the murine small intestine and NK cells share expression of the surface marker NKp46; however, this intestinal ILC subset lacks the expression of other NK markers, such as NK1.1 and CD49b, and depends on the transcriptional factor RORγt for its development and differentiation [7, 8]. Furthermore, these RORγt+ ILCs are functionally unique in that they produce IL-22 [7–9]. Because IL-22 acts on mucous membranes and enhances mucosal barrier function [10], these so-called “ILC-22” cells play a key role in host immune defense.
Although some information regarding the NK cells and ILCs in the upper respiratory airways is available [11], they have not been well characterized. To address this deficit, we used Ncr1 GFP/+ knock-in mice [12], in which the NK-cell–specific marker Ncr1 is replaced by green fluorescent protein (GFP), to confirm the presence of NK cells in the upper respiratory tract (i.e., nasal passages) and to analyze the immunologically and functionally unique characteristics of nasal NK cells, including their role in the clearance of nasally inoculated influenza virus.
Materials and Methods
Mice
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Japan SLC (Shizuoka, Japan). ICRnu/nu mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories JAPAN (Kangawa, Japan). Ncr1 GFP/+ mice were generated as previously described [12] and housed under specific-pathogen–free conditions at the animal facility of the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo. Animal experiments were approved by and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Tokyo. Mice were evaluated daily or every other day and remained clinically healthy during experiments, even after influenza viral infection. No mouse died due to experimental manipulation.
Immunohistochemistry
Head tissues of 8-week-old Ncr1 GFP/+ mice were obtained after decapitation, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, preserved in 15% sucrose, and embedded in O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan); 6-mm sections of frozen nasal tissues were obtained [13]. Purified anti-GFP (A11122; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and phycoerythrin–anti-mouse CD45 (30-F11; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) were used as primary antibodies; biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG was used as the secondary antibody for anti-GFP and was detected by using the Cyanine 5 Tyramide Signal Amplification kit (NEL704A001KT or NEL705A001KT; PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA). Sections were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and analyzed under a fluorescence microscope (BZ-9000, Keyence, Osaka, Japan).
Cell preparation and flow cytometry
Splenic tissues were passed through a 70-μm mesh filter to obtain lymphocytes. Nasal and lung tissues were dissociated mechanically, and then treated twice by using RPMI1640 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) supplemented with 0.5 mg/mL collagenase type IV (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) for 20 min with vigorous stirring at 37°C. Small intestine was treated by using RPMI1640 supplemented with 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, followed by RMPI1640 only, and then by RPMI1640 supplemented with collagenase with vigorous stirring at 37°C for 20 min each treatment. Collected cells were then enriched by using the Percoll (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) gradient method [14]. Cells were stained with the appropriate fluorescence-conjugated antibodies. Anti-CD3 (clone, 145-2C11), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-CD27 (LG.3A10), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD49b (DX5), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3), anti-CD103 (R35-95), anti-CD107a (1D4B), anti-NK1.1 (PK136), and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences; anti-Ly49A (A1), anti-Ly49C/F/H/I (14B11), anti-Ly49D (eBio4E5), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-granzyme B (NGZB), and anti-2B4 (eBio24F4) were from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA, USA). We also used isotype-matched fluorescent-conjugated antibodies for control staining. Stained cells were evaluated by flow cytometry (FACS Canto II, BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed by using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
Cell stimulation and staining of granzyme B, CD107a, and intracellular IFN-γ
Mononuclear cells isolated from tissues (1 × 106 cells/mL) were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (200 ng/mL) and ionomycin (1 μg/mL) (Sigma) or with mouse IL-12 (20 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and mouse IL-18 (5 ng/mL; Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan) for 4 h at 37°C in the presence of Golgistop (BD Biosciences). During the stimulation period, anti-CD107a antibody (5 μg/mL) or an isotype-matched control was added. After stimulation, intracellular IFN-γ was detected by using a Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus Fixation–Permeabilization Kit (BD Biosciences), followed by flow cytometric analysis. Granzyme B was detected as described for IFN-γ but without prior stimulation of the cells.
Influenza virus infection
Influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1, PR8; Sankyo Labo Service, Tokyo, Japan) was used for infection. Mice were infected intranasally with 103 plaque-forming units (pfu) of PR8 diluted in 10 μL PBS (5 μL in each nostril) without anesthesia; this technique initially limits the infection to the nasal passages, and infection spreads to lung after several days [15]. On days 2 and 5 after infection, samples of nasal tissue were obtained for the analysis of cells by flow cytometry.
NK1.1+ cell depletion and titration of influenza virus in nasal passage
PK136 anti-NK1.1 antibody was purified from the ascites of ICRnu/nu mice injected intraperitoneally with PK136 hybridoma cells (HB-191, ATCC, Vienna, VA, USA). To deplete NK1.1+ cells, each mouse (C57BL/6) was injected intraperitoneally with 100 μg of PK136 antibody (in 100 μL PBS) or PBS only (vehicle control). PK136 antibody was given on days –2, –1, and 2 relative to influenza inoculation (day 0). On days 2 and 5 after virus infection, whole nasal tissue was individually homogenized in 1 mL PBS by using a Tissue Lyser II (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). The resulting homogenates were examined by plaque-forming assay on Madin–Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells as previously described [16]. Briefly, near-confluent 3.8-cm2 MDCK cell monolayers were infected with 100 μL of 10- to 104-fold diluted aliquots of homogenate for 1 h at 37°C. These MDCK cells were washed with DMEM and then overlaid with 1 mL DMEM containing 1 mg/mL trypsin (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 1% agarose. Cultures were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h, after which plaques were visualized by using crystal violet.
Statistical analyses
To analyze data, the Mann–Whitney U test was used; Ryan’s multiple-comparison method was included as needed. Significance was defined as a P value of <0.05.
Results
Visualization of nasal NKp46+ cells
Murine NK cells express the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46, which is encoded by the Ncr1 gene [17, 18]. To facilitate the identification of the possibly few NK cells present in mouse nasal passages, we used Ncr1 GFP/+ knock-in mice [8, 12]. Because this gene-manipulated strain of mice expresses a GFP reporter under the control of the Ncr1 promoter, GFP+ cells are considered to be NK cells. As shown in Fig 1a, GFP+NKp46+ cells were located in the lamina propria region of nasal mucosa, similar to their location in the small intestinal lamina propria [7, 8]. In addition, GFP+NKp46+ cells were present in the nasal concha, albeit at a lower level than in the nasal passages (Fig 1b).
Characteristics of nasal NKp46+ cells
To define the unique immunobiological characteristics of nasal NK cells, mononuclear cells from the nasal passages and nasopharyngeal associated lymphoid tissue of Ncr1 GFP/+ mice were analyzed for the expression of cell-surface molecules by using flow cytometry. For comparison, splenic and pulmonary NKp46+ cells from same mice were evaluated. CD3−NKp46+ cells accounted for approximately 1.7% of the CD45+ lymphocytes in nasal passages, with a similar frequency found in spleen (Fig 2a). In contrast, few CD3−NKp46+ cells (less than 0.5% of CD45+ lymphocytes) were found in nasopharyngeal associated lymphoid tissue (Fig 2a).
Conventional NK cells (included in group 1 ILCs) [6] express a variety of cell-surface markers including CD122 (IL-2Rβ) [19], CD161 (recognized by the NK1.1 antibody) [4], 2B4 receptor (which mediates non-major histocompatibility complex(MHC)-restricted cell killing), and CD49b (DX5; also known as adhesion molecule integrin α-2) [4, 20]. Here, nasal NKp46+ cells expressed these NK-specific surface molecules in the same patterns as did splenic and lung NK cells (Fig 2b). In addition, nasal NKp46+ cells did not express CD127 (IL-7Rα) (Fig 2b) whereas those from the lamina propria of the small intestine did express CD127 (S1 Fig). Our results suggest that nasal NKp46+ cells belong to the classic NK-cell lineage and are not RORγt+ ILCs, which are NK1.1– and CD127+ [6]. Therefore, our results suggest that, like their splenic and pulmonary counterparts, nasal NKp46+ cells are NK cells.
Expression of Ly49 family receptors in nasal NK cells
The Ly49 receptor family consists of a cluster of transmembrane C-type lectin receptors [17, 21]. NK cells express various Ly49 receptors, which recognize MHC class Ia molecules expressed by target cells [17, 21]. Ly49 receptors transmit activating or inhibitory signals to regulate the cytotoxicity of NK cells against normal host cells [18]. Here, although NK cells from murine nasal passages, spleen, and lung all expressed a repertoire of Ly49 family receptors, the expression pattern differed depending on the site from which the NK cells were isolated (Fig 3). A slightly higher percentage of NK cells in nasal passage expressed Ly49A than did those in lung or spleen (Fig 3a) (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method), and a greater percentage of splenic NK cells expressed Ly49C/F/H/I than did nasal and pulmonary NK cells (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method) (Fig 3b). In addition, the percentage of Ly49D+ NK cells in nasal passages was slightly but reproducibly less than that in spleen and lung (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method) (Fig 3c).
Unique maturation and activation patterns of nasal NK cells
CD27 and CD11b molecules have been used to classify NK cells into four different developmental stages [22, 23]. We used these markers to analyze the maturation pattern of NK cells from mouse nasal passages. Consistent with a previous report [3], splenic NK cells included large populations of CD27highCD11bhigh mature and CD27lowCD11bhigh senescent cells and few CD27highCD11blow immature cells (Fig 4a). In comparison, most lung NK cells comprised a CD27lowCD11bhigh senescent population (Fig 4a), whereas nasal NK cells included numerous CD27highCD11blow immature cells (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method) (Fig 4a). Compared with those from lung and spleen, fewer nasal NK cells expressed CD62L (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 4b), the expression of which is known to be unregulated according to the maturation of NK cells [3].
In addition, nasal NK cells showed up-regulated expression of CD69 (P < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 4b), a known maturation and activation marker of NK cells [24, 25]. We then examined the NK-cell expression of CD69 and CD103, which are expressed by lymphocytes that reside in mucosal tissue [26]. About one-third of CD69+ nasal NK cells are CD103+ (Fig 4b), suggesting that the majority of nasal NK cells are activated and express CD69 independent of whether they reside in tissue.
Effector functions of nasal NK cells
The results of our surface-molecule expression analysis of CD69 (Fig 4b) imply that a subset of nasal NK cells is in a functionally activated state. Because granzyme B is a serine protease and is a component of the cytoplasmic granules of NK cells, its expression directly correlates with the cytotoxicity of NK cells [27, 28]. The granzyme B level of nasal NK cells isolated from Ncr1 GFP/+ mice was very similar to those of splenic and pulmonary NK cells (P > 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 5a).
CD107a, also known as lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP-1) [29], is up-regulated on the surfaces of CD8+ T cells [30] and NK cells [31] after their stimulation, and its expression correlates well with the degranulation of chemical mediators and cytotoxic activity [31]. When stimulated with PMA and ionomycin, most splenic NK cells from Ncr1 GFP/+ mice expressed CD107a on their cell surfaces, consistent with the results of a previous study [31], indicating that these cells possess cytotoxic activity. Compared with splenic NK cells, pulmonary and nasal NK cells showed significantly less up-regulation of CD107a surface expression (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 5b and 5d). Similar trends were seen after the exposure of these various NK cell populations to IL-12 plus IL-18 (Fig 5c and 5e), in that the frequencies of nasal and pulmonary IFN-γ+ NK cells were significantly lower than that of splenic NK cells Mann-Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 5c). These results suggest that nasal NK cells are functionally hyposensitive to typical stimulation regimens that induce cytotoxic activation.
Role of nasal NK cells in influenza infection
Although nasal NK cells showed appropriate levels of granzyme B expression during the resting (or naïve) state (Fig 5a), these cells seemed to have lower degranulation ability (Fig 5b) and to produce lower levels of IFN-γ after in vitro stimulation (Fig 5c). We next investigated whether nasal NK cells act as initial innate effector cells during in vivo influenza virus infection.
We adopted a commonly used influenza virus infection model [15, 32] coupled with or without depletion of NK cells by intraperitoneal injection of anti-NK1.1 antibody [33, 34]. Anti-NK1.1 antibody treatment successfully eliminated almost all splenic, pulmonary, and nasal NK cells by day 2 after injection (S2 Fig). Unanaesthetized mice were challenged intranasally with small amounts of virus-containing fluid (as little as 10 μL total, 5 μL in each nostril); this technique initially limits the infection to the nasal passages, and infection spreads to lung after several days [15].
These mice, which had been inoculated with 1 × 103 pfu influenza A virus PR8, were examined for changes in the nasal NK cell population over time. Despite their hyporesponsiveness (Fig 5b and 5c), nasal NK cells were increased significantly in percentage on day 2 (P < 0.05) and day 5 (P < 0.01), as well as in number on day 5 (P < 0.05), compared with those of day 0 after nasal challenge with PR8 (Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 6a). Furthermore, the level of CD69 expression by nasal NK cells was significantly higher on day 5 than on days 0 or 2 (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test with Ryan’s multiple comparison method; Fig 6b).
We then compared viral growth in the nasal passage between the NK-cell–depleted and control groups. Whereas NK cell depletion had no effect on the amount of virus in the nasal passages during the immediate phase of the infection (e.g., day 2 after infection), viral titers on day 5 were significantly higher in the nasal passages of NK-cell–depleted mice compared with control mice (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test; Fig 6c). These findings suggest that nasal NK cells respond to influenza infection and consequently inhibit virus replication, especially during the early stages of the infection.
Discussion
We have demonstrated the presence of NK cells in murine nasal passages (upper respiratory tract) (Figs 1 and 2) and have shown that, compared with splenic and pulmonary NK cells, nasal NK cells have decreased expression of Ly49 family receptors and are relatively immature, but they can be activated under naïve conditions (Fig 3). Despite their up-regulated expression of activation markers such as CD69, nasal NK cells somehow respond less dramatically to stimuli such as plus and IL-12 plus IL-18, release fewer granules, and produce less IFN-γ than do their splenic counterparts (Fig 5d and 5e). Despite the hyporesponsiveness and relatively small number (no more than 104 cells per mouse) of nasal NK cells, our current results suggest an indispensable role of nasal NK cells in the control of nasal influenza virus infection, during which they inhibit viral growth at the early stages of the infection (Fig 6c).
NK cells are distributed in various organs, including primary and secondary lymphoid tissues, such as the thymus and peripheral lymph nodes, respectively [35], non-lymphoid tissues such as liver [3, 36, 37] and skin [7], and mucosal tissues such as the reproductive [25], digestive [7, 8], and lower respiratory [3, 34] tracts. The phenotypes and functions of NK cells differ depending on the source organ or tissue. Because the nasal passages are a ‘front line’ in respiratory defense, the characteristics and functions of nasal NK cells should be clarified, but little information is currently available regarding NK cells in upper respiratory airways. Our current study revealed the unique characteristics of nasal NK cells.
To identify NK cells efficiently and precisely, we used Ncr1 GFP/+ knock-in mice, which serve as NK cell reporter mice [8, 12]. The immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the presence of NK cells in the lamina propria of nasal mucosa, as in the intestines and skin [7, 8]. In addition, we verified that nasal NKp46+ cells are CD3− and belong to the conventional NK-cell (member of group 1 ILCs), rather than to the recently identified other ILC lineages (Fig 2a and 2b) [6]. Conventional NK cells express CD122, NK1.1, 2B4, and CD49b [4]. All of these markers are present on nasal NKp46+ cells (Fig 2b) and their splenic and pulmonary counterparts. Both conventional NK cells and RORγt+ ILCs are known to express NKp46 as well as CD127 [6], but unlike in the lamina propria of the small intestine [7, 8], RORγt+ ILCs were not present in nasal passages, because these tissue samples lacked NKp46+NK1.1−CD127+ cells (Fig 2b).
The Ly49 receptor family is important for discrimination between normal and neoplastic or infected cells [17, 38]. Each NK cell is thought to expresses one to three Ly49 receptor(s) stochastically. The precise mechanism regulating the expression of these receptors remains unclear [38], but a recent report indicates that the expression of Ly49 receptors, as well as other surface molecules, is regulated by pathogens such as influenza virus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Klebsiella pneumonia [38]. Here, we showed that the expression repertoire of Ly49 family receptors of NK cells differed slightly among nasal passage, spleen, and lung (Fig 3). Therefore, we speculate that differences in the microenvironments (including commensal bacteria) among these tissues may result in the diverse expression of Ly49 family receptors.
Like surface molecule expression, the maturation and activation patterns of NK cells varies among their anatomic sites [3, 9, 10], reflecting NK cell function in situ. In terms of maturation, CD27 and CD11b frequently are used to differentiate NK cells according to CD27highCD11blow immature, CD27highCD11bhigh mature, and CD27lowCD11bhigh senescent subpopulations [3]. Bone marrow and lymph node NK cells are CD27high, that is, relatively immature cells, whereas hepatic and blood NK cells tend to be CD11bhigh, or relatively mature cells [3]. We found that the nasal NK cell population has a unique CD27–CD11b pattern (Fig 4a), with a significant abundance of CD27highCD11blow immature cells, whereas most splenic NK cells were CD11bhigh mature cells and most pulmonary NK cells were CD27lowCD11bhigh senescent cells, as reported previously [3]. This speculation is supported by our finding that the percentage of NK cells expressing CD62L (a marker known to be upregulated as NK cells mature [3]) was lower in nasal passages than in lung of spleen (Fig 4b), given that CD62L is upregulated as NK cells mature [3]. We also studied other activation-related markers, such as CD69 [24], an adhesion molecule required for the migration of cells from the blood circulation to peripheral tissues. Because CD69 is also known as a marker of mucosal-tissue-resident cells, [26] we examined its co-expression with CD103, another molecule expressed by resident cells at mucosal sites (Fig 4b). Only one-third of CD69+ NK cells also expressed CD103, and we therefore speculate that an as-yet unknown factor induces CD69 expression, or spontaneous activation of nasal NK cells, regardless of mucosal residency.
Here, we have shown that splenic, pulmonary, and nasal NK cells contain nearly equal amounts of granzyme B in secretion granules (Fig 5a). However, CD107a expression levels indicate weaker degranulation activity of nasal NK cells in response to stimulation with PMA–ionomycin or IL-12–IL-18, compared with their splenic counterparts (Fig 4b). In addition, IFN-γ production by nasal NK cells is reduced in response to these stimuli (Fig 4c). Dermal NK cells share some features with nasal NK cells, such as elevated CD69 expression and hyporesponsiveness in vitro [7]. This resemblance suggests a possible interaction between NK cells and commensal bacteria, which shape various characteristics of NK cells, as does expression of Ly49 receptors[17]. The lower respiratory airway is relatively sterile under healthy conditions, and during infection, pulmonary cells need to respond promptly. It therefore is rational that fully mature, non-activated NK cells reside in the lung. In contrast, nasal passages [39], like the skin [40], are constantly stimulated by foreign antigens and pathogens, and to respond to these stimuli, nasal and dermal NK cells may acquire and maintain an activated phenotype. Studies of the interaction between nasal NK cells and bacteria, including both pathogenic and commensal organisms, likely would clarify the cause of the tissue-specific activation status of NK cells. Given their lack of NK-typical functions, nasal NK cells might have a unique function other than producing IFN-γ and cytotoxic granules.
The hyporesponsiveness of nasal NK cells prompted us to investigate their functional role in nasal infection in vivo. We hypothesized that NK cells would have a minor effect on decreasing infection. The importance of NK cells in controlling virus infections has long been under extensive discussion [33, 41, 42]. In the present study, we adapted a nasal influenza virus infection model [15, 32], because controlling nasal infection is supposed to be an important arm of the surface defense system for the prevention of airway infection and subsequent systemic progression. On day 2, CD69 expression was not upregulated in nasal NK cells, and the absence of NK cells did not change the amount of virus in the nasal passage (Fig 6b and 6c). From this result, we consider that NK cells in nasal passages are unresponsive to influenza viral infection before day 2. However, despite the hyporesponsiveness of nasal NK cells, NK cell depletion resulted in increased influenza viral titers in the nasal passages on day 5 after intranasal infection (Fig 6c). On day 5, we noted increases of both cell number and CD69 expression of nasal NK cells (Fig 6a and 6b). Therefore, between day 2 and day 5, the NK cells in the nasal passages apparently respond to influenza virus infection and inhibit viral replication. As for nasal NK cells, the depletion of pulmonary NK cells leads to an increase in influenza viral titer [31]. We were unable to determine whether the accumulation of nasal NK cells was due to the proliferation of local NK cells or to the migration of circulating NK cells, but the number of NK cells on day 5 was not more than twice that on day 2 (Fig 6a). Therefore, the majority of NK cells found in nasal passages on day 5 are probably local resident NK cells, and without these cells, nasal influenza virus infection is difficult to control.
Protection against viral infection is thought to be controlled through multilayered surface and systemic barrier systems [43]. In the proposed mechanism, innate immune cells such as NK cells and γδ T cells first initiate an innate immune response, which is supported by cytokines including IL-12 and IL-18 produced by antigen-presenting cells [43]. This process is followed by an acquired immune response, in which antibody-producing B cells and helper–cytotoxic T cells play an important role [43]. As shown in previous studies [44, 45], our results indicate the function of NK cells in the nasal innate immunity, against influenza virus during the early phases of infection. Similar to the pulmonary NK cells of aged mice [34], hyporesponsive nasal NK cells still contribute to the clearance of influenza virus, perhaps at the initial stage of upper respiratory infection. Although the ability of nasal NK cells to respond to extracellular stimuli is lower than those of splenic and pulmonary NK cells (Fig 5b and 5c), nasal NK cells can and do respond sufficiently to control influenza infection. Additional study of the activity of nasal NK cells against other viruses, such as rhinovirus and adenovirus, is important to gain a complete understanding of nasal NK-cell–mediated innate immunity.
Conclusions
We used Ncr1 GFP/+ knock-in mice to confirm the presence and elucidate the phenotypes of immunologically important nasal NK cells. Compared with those of spleen and lung, nasal NK cells showed a unique maturation and activation status. Although nasal NK cells had an immature and activated phenotype, they responded less dramatically than did their lung counterparts to extracellular stimuli in vitro. Despite their hyporesponsiveness, nasal NK cells contributed to the control of nasal influenza virus infection in vivo.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank Dr. Satoshi Fukuyama and Ms. Izumi Ishikawa of the ERATO Kawaoka Infection-induced Host Responses Program for constructive advice and technical assistance, respectively, in the influenza virus titration experiment.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Funding provided by The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists B [25860353 to S.S.]), http://www.jsps.go.jp/j-grantsinaid/, and The Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (to H.K.), http://www.jst.go.jp/kisoken/crest/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Trinchieri G. Biology of natural killer cells. Adv Immunol. 1989;47:187–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kimura MY, Nakayama T. Differentiation of NK1 and NK2 cells. Crit Rev Immunol. 2005;25(5):361–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hayakawa Y, Smyth M. CD27 dissects mature NK cells into two subsets with distinct responsiveness and migratory capacity. J Immunol. 2006;176(3):1517–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huntington ND, Vosshenrich CA, Di Santo JP. Developmental pathways that generate natural-killer-cell diversity in mice and humans. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(9):703–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Blasius AL, Barchet W, Cella M, Colonna M. Development and function of murine B220+CD11c+NK1.1+ cells identify them as a subset of NK cells. J Exp Med. 2007;204(11):2561–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Spits H, Di Santo JP. The expanding family of innate lymphoid cells: regulators and effectors of immunity and tissue remodeling. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(1):21–7. 10.1038/ni.1962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Luci C, Reynders A, Ivanov II, Cognet C, Chiche L, Chasson L, et al. Influence of the transcription factor RORgammat on the development of NKp46+ cell populations in gut and skin. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(1):75–82. 10.1038/ni.1681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Satoh-Takayama N, Vosshenrich CA, Lesjean-Pottier S, Sawa S, Lochner M, Rattis F, et al. Microbial flora drives interleukin 22 production in intestinal NKp46+ cells that provide innate mucosal immune defense. Immunity. 2008;29(6):958–70. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cella M, Fuchs A, Vermi W, Facchetti F, Otero K, Lennerz JK, et al. A human natural killer cell subset provides an innate source of IL-22 for mucosal immunity. Nature. 2009;457(7230):722–5. 10.1038/nature07537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liang SC, Tan XY, Luxenberg DP, Karim R, Dunussi-Joannopoulos K, Collins M, et al. Interleukin (IL)-22 and IL-17 are coexpressed by Th17 cells and cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides. J Exp Med. 2006;203(10):2271–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rodriguez-Monroy MA, Rojas-Hernandez S, Moreno-Fierros L. Phenotypic and functional differences between lymphocytes from NALT and nasal passages of mice. Scand J Immunol. 2007;65(3):276–88. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2006.01898.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gazit R, Gruda R, Elboim M, Arnon TI, Katz G, Achdout H, et al. Lethal influenza infection in the absence of the natural killer cell receptor gene Ncr1. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(5):517–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nochi T, Yuki Y, Takahashi H, Sawada S, Mejima M, Kohda T, et al. Nanogel antigenic protein-delivery system for adjuvant-free intranasal vaccines. Nat Mater. 2010;9(7):572–8. 10.1038/nmat2784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kurono Y, Yamamoto M, Fujihashi K, Kodama S, Suzuki M, Mogi G, et al. Nasal immunization induces Haemophilus influenzae-specific Th1 and Th2 responses with mucosal IgA and systemic IgG antibodies for protective immunity. J Infect Dis. 1999;180(1):122–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cottey R, Rowe CA, Bender BS. Influenza virus. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2001;Chapter 19:Unit 19 1 10.1002/0471142735.im1911s42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hayden FG, Cote KM, Douglas RG Jr. Plaque inhibition assay for drug susceptibility testing of influenza viruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980;17(5):865–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Anderson SK, Ortaldo JR, McVicar DW. The ever-expanding Ly49 gene family: repertoire and signaling. Immunol Rev. 2001;181(1):79–89. 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2001.1810106.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ma BJ, Kane KP, Lavender KJ. Ly-49 Receptors and Their Functions. Crit Rev Immunol. 2004;24(5):321–48. 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v24.i5.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rosmaraki EE, Douagi I, Roth C, Colucci F, Cumano A, Di Santo JP. Identification of committed NK cell progenitors in adult murine bone marrow. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(6):1900–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Fernandez NC, Treiner E, Vance RE, Jamieson AM, Lemieux S, Raulet DH. A subset of natural killer cells achieves self-tolerance without expressing inhibitory receptors specific for self-MHC molecules. Blood. 2005;105(11):4416–23. 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ortaldo JR, Mason AT, Winkler-Pickett R, Raziuddin A, Murphy WJ, Mason LH. Ly-49 receptor expression and functional analysis in multiple mouse strains. J Leukoc Biol. 1999;66(3):512–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chiossone L, Chaix J, Fuseri N, Roth C, Vivier E, Walzer T. Maturation of mouse NK cells is a 4-stage developmental program. Blood. 2009;113(22):5488–96. 10.1182/blood-2008-10-187179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hayakawa Y, Huntington ND, Nutt SL, Smyth MJ. Functional subsets of mouse natural killer cells. Immunol Rev. 2006;214(1):47–55. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00454.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Borrego F, Robertson MJ, Ritz J, Pena J, Solana R. CD69 is a stimulatory receptor for natural killer cell and its cytotoxic effect is blocked by CD94 inhibitory receptor. Immunology. 1999;97(1):159–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mallidi TV, Craig LE, Schloemann SR, Riley JK. Murine endometrial and decidual NK1.1+ natural killer cells display a B220+CD11c+ cell surface phenotype. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(2):310–8. 10.1095/biolreprod.109.076448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Radulovic K, Niess JH. CD69 is the crucial regulator of intestinal inflammation: a new target molecule for IBD treatment? J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:497056 10.1155/2015/497056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Shresta S, MacIvor DM, Heusel JW, Russell JH, Ley TJ. Natural killer and lymphokine-activated killer cells require granzyme B for the rapid induction of apoptosis in susceptible target cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(12):5679–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kagi D, Ledermann B, Burki K, Seiler P, Odermatt B, Olsen KJ, et al. Cytotoxicity mediated by T cells and natural killer cells is greatly impaired in perforin-deficient mice. Nature. 1994;369(6475):31–7. 10.1038/369031a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Winchester BG. Lysosomal membrane proteins. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2001;5 Suppl A:11–9. 10.1053/ejpn.2000.0428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Betts MR, Brenchley JM, Price DA, De Rosa SC, Douek DC, Roederer M, et al. Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation. J Immunol Methods. 2003;281(1–2):65–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Alter G, Malenfant J, Altfeld M. CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. J Immunol Methods. 2004;294(1–2):15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tamura S, Miyata K, Matsuo K, Asanuma H, Takahashi H, Nakajima K, et al. Acceleration of influenza virus clearance by Th1 cells in the nasal site of mice immunized intranasally with adjuvant-combined recombinant nucleoprotein. J Immunol. 1996;156(10):3892–900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bot A, Reichlin A, Isobe H, Bot S, Schulman J, Yokoyama WM, et al. Cellular mechanisms involved in protection and recovery from influenza virus infection in immunodeficient mice. J Virol. 1996;70(8):5668–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Nogusa S, Ritz BW, Kassim SH, Jennings SR, Gardner EM. Characterization of age-related changes in natural killer cells during primary influenza infection in mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129(4):223–30. 10.1016/j.mad.2008.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Vosshenrich CA, Garcia-Ojeda ME, Samson-Villeger SI, Pasqualetto V, Enault L, Richard-Le Goff O, et al. A thymic pathway of mouse natural killer cell development characterized by expression of GATA-3 and CD127. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(11):1217–24. 10.1038/ni1395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Smyth MJ, Cretney E, Takeda K, Wiltrout RH, Sedger LM, Kayagaki N, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) contributes to interferon gamma-dependent natural killer cell protection from tumor metastasis. J Exp Med. 2001;193(6):661–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Takeda K, Cretney E, Hayakawa Y, Ota T, Akiba H, Ogasawara K, et al. TRAIL identifies immature natural killer cells in newborn mice and adult mouse liver. Blood. 2005;105(5):2082–9. 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Joncker NT, Raulet DH. Regulation of NK cell responsiveness to achieve self-tolerance and maximal responses to diseased target cells. Immunol Rev. 2008;224:85–97. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00658.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ichinohe T, Pang IK, Kumamoto Y, Peaper DR, Ho JH, Murray TS, et al. Microbiota regulates immune defense against respiratory tract influenza A virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(13):5354–9. 10.1073/pnas.1019378108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Tavakkol Z, Samuelson D, deLancey Pulcini E, Underwood RA, Usui ML, Costerton JW, et al. Resident bacterial flora in the skin of C57BL/6 mice housed under SPF conditions. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010;49(5):588–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bukowski JF, Woda BA, Habu S, Okumura K, Welsh RM. Natural killer cell depletion enhances virus synthesis and virus-induced hepatitis in vivo. J Immunol. 1983;131(3):1531–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Stein-Streilein J, Guffee J, Fan W. Locally and systemically derived natural killer cells participate in defense against intranasally inoculated influenza virus. Reg Immunol. 1988;1(2):100–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tamura S, Kurata T. Defense mechanisms against influenza virus infection in the respiratory tract mucosa. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004;57(6):236–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Zhou G, Juang SW, Kane KP. NK cells exacerbate the pathology of influenza virus infection in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43(4):929–38. 10.1002/eji.201242620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Hall LJ, Clare S, Dougan G. NK cells influence both innate and adaptive immune responses after mucosal immunization with antigen and mucosal adjuvant. J Immunol. 2010;184(8):4327–37. 10.4049/jimmunol.0903357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.