Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2015 Nov 18;5:83. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00083

Commentary: The icmF3 Locus is Involved in Multiple Adaptation- and Virulence-related Characteristics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

Le Tang 1, Xiaoye Liang 1, Richard Moore 1, Tao G Dong 1,*
PMCID: PMC4649053  PMID: 26636045

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important pathogen commonly isolated from patients with burns, wounds and cystic fibrosis (Lyczak et al., 2000; Gellatly and Hancock, 2013). The P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 was originally reported as a wound isolate from a patient in Australia in 1955 (Holloway, 1955), and has since been studied in many laboratories as a reference strain (Stover et al., 2000). However, a number of genetic variants of PAO1 in different laboratories have been reported including a large 2.2 Mb inversion and a number of single nucleotide variants and insertion-deletion mutations (Stover et al., 2000; Heurlier et al., 2005; Klockgether et al., 2010).

The type 6 secretion system (T6SS) functions as a molecular weapon that delivers toxic effectors to prokaryotic and eukaryotic target cells (Ho et al., 2014). The T6SS was first functionally characterized in Vibrio cholerae and P. aeruginosa PAO1 by the Mekalanos group in 2006 (Mougous et al., 2006; Pukatzki et al., 2006), and thereafter the PAO1 strain has been used as an important model to study the T6SS functions (Ho et al., 2014; Russell et al., 2014). PAO1 possesses three distinct T6SS clusters (H1, H2, and H3) of which the H1-T6SS delivers six known antimicrobial substrates (Hood et al., 2010; Whitney et al., 2014). The H2- and the H3-T6SS are implicated in both antimicrobial and anti-eukaryotic activities and can secrete PldA and PldB phospholipases, respectively (Lesic et al., 2009; Sana et al., 2012; Russell et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2014).

The T6SS main structure consists of an outer sheath, an inner tube, and a membrane-bound anchor complex (Basler, 2015). Contraction of the outer sheath ejects the inner tube and its associated effector proteins to the extracellular environment (Ho et al., 2014; Basler, 2015). IcmF, a key T6SS protein, carries an ATPase domain (Ma et al., 2012) and interacts with TssL and TssJ to form a membrane-spanning complex with a hollow space that allows the inner tube and effectors to travel through (Basler, 2015; Durand et al., 2015). The recently published paper by Lin et al. (Lin et al., 2015) reported multiple interesting yet moderate phenotypes associated with the IcmF3 of the H3-T6SS, including iron acquisition, bacterial killing, motility, antibiotic resistance, and virulence. However, the molecular mechanism of IcmF3 involvement in such diverse cellular processes is not clear. Because IcmF is required for T6SS assembly, those reported phenotypes suggest a broad versatile role of the H3-T6SS in PAO1 (Lin et al., 2015). Interestingly, the T6SS in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is involved in Zn2+ transportation (Wang et al., 2015). An alternative but not mutually exclusive explanation is that IcmF3 itself regulates other cellular processes in addition to its primary role as a key T6SS component.

Lin et al. tested Escherichia coli survival after co-incubation with PAO1 or the icmF3 mutant for 36 h and reported that the CFU of E. coli remained at a high level (108 CFU/ml, see Table S3 in Lin et al., 2015). We found this surprising because the PAO1 strain in our lab (L-PAO1), obtained from J. Mekalanos (Mougous et al., 2006; Basler et al., 2013) and originally from S. Lory, can efficiently kill E. coli cells after 24 h co-incubation. Considering the reported genome divergence of PAO1 in different laboratories (Klockgether et al., 2010), we hypothesized that different PAO1 sublines may have variable killing abilities against E. coli. To test this hypothesis, we carried out E. coli killing assays using several PAO1 strains from different sources (Figure 1A), of which the L-PAO1 has been used extensively in T6SS research (Mougous et al., 2006; Hood et al., 2010; Basler et al., 2013; Ho et al., 2013). The H-PAO1 and the M-PAO1 are isolates from R. Hancock and C. Manoil, respectively, and are the host strains for two defined PAO1 transposon mutant libraries (Jacobs et al., 2003; Lewenza et al., 2005). The P-PAO1 strain and the V-PAO1 strain are from M. Parsek (Colvin et al., 2011) and E. Banin (Cohen et al., 2015), respectively. We followed the reported protocol by Lin et al. (2015) with minor modifications, primarily that the killing was done on LB medium directly instead of a filter membrane. Overnight cultures of PAO1 and E. coli MG1655 carrying a pPSV37 plasmid vector (gentamycin resistance) (Lee et al., 2010) were washed with fresh LB and then mixed at a 10 to 1 ratio, followed by co-incubation on a LB agar plate at 37°C for 36 h. Survival of E. coli was enumerated by serial dilutions on LB-gentamycin plates. Our results demonstrate that L-PAO1, V-PAO1, and H-PAO1 eliminated E. coli MG1655 after co-incubation, whereas P-PAO1 and M-PAO1 had little killing activity against E. coli (Figures 1B,C). To test if the T6SS is required for the observed killing, we constructed the tssB1 deletion mutant (ΔH1-T6SS) and the tssB1-3 triple deletion mutant (ΔT6SS) in the L-PAO1 strain. Our results show that both mutants killed E. coli efficiently, suggesting L-PAO1 possesses other antimicrobial mechanisms independent of the T6SS clusters.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Survival of E. coli MG1655 cells after incubation with different Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 strains. (A) The source of strains used in this study. (B) Survival of E. coli MG1655 pPSV37 enumerated by serial dilutions. L-PAO1ΔT6SS-1 is the tssB1 mutant defective in the H1-T6SS, and L-PAO1ΔT6SS is the tssB1-3 triple mutant defective in all three T6SS systems. (C) Summary of the killing assays. Experiments were performed three times. The mean values and the standard errors are shown.

The genome divergence of different PAO1 strains is known to cause phenotypic variations in virulence (Preston et al., 1995; Klockgether et al., 2010). Here we show different PAO1 strains also differ in their capability of killing neighboring cells. In complex multispecies environments such as the cystic fibrosis patient's lung, it is conceivable that competition between different species may select for PAO1 mutants with enhanced killing abilities. However, how PAO1 strains during lab passage diverge to gain/lose antimicrobial properties is not intuitively apparent. Nonetheless, because PAO1 is widely used as a model strain, researchers should be aware of the strain variations and should provide detailed description of the strain source to allow the P. aeruginosa community to better interpret the results.

Author contributions

LT, XL, RM performed the experiments. TD conceived the study and designed the experiment. LT and TD wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This work was supported by a start-up grant of the University of Calgary and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant to TD. TD is also supported by a Government of Canada Research Chair award, a Canadian Foundation for Innovation grant (CFI-JELF), and an Alberta Innovation and Advanced Education grant.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to John Mekalanos for providing L-PAO1, Shawn Lewenza for H-PAO1 and Joe J. Harrison for P-PAO1, M-PAO1, and V-PAO1 strains. We thank the Advancing Canadian Wastewater Assets (ACWA) for providing infrastructure support.

References

  1. Basler M. (2015). Type VI secretion system: secretion by a contractile nanomachine. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 370:20150021. 10.1098/rstb.2015.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basler M., Ho B. T., Mekalanos J. J. (2013). Tit-for-tat: type VI secretion system counterattack during bacterial cell-cell interactions. Cell 152, 884–894. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen D., Mechold U., Nevenzal H., Yarmiyhu Y., Randall T. E., Bay D. C., et al. (2015). Oligoribonuclease is a central feature of cyclic diguanylate signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 11359–11364. 10.1073/pnas.1421450112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colvin K. M., Gordon V. D., Murakami K., Borlee B. R., Wozniak D. J., Wong G. C. L., et al. (2011). The pel polysaccharide can serve a structural and protective role in the biofilm matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001264. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durand E., Nguyen V. S., Zoued A., Logger L., Péhau-Arnaudet G., Aschtgen M.-S., et al. (2015). Biogenesis and structure of a type VI secretion membrane core complex. Nature 523, 555–560. 10.1038/nature14667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gellatly S. L., Hancock R. E. W. (2013). Pseudomonas aeruginosa: new insights into pathogenesis and host defenses. Pathog. Dis. 67, 159–173. 10.1111/2049-632X.12033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heurlier K., Dénervaud V., Haenni M., Guy L., Krishnapillai V., Haas D. (2005). Quorum-sensing-negative (lasR) mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa avoid cell lysis and death. J. Bacteriol. 187, 4875–4883. 10.1128/JB.187.14.4875-4883.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ho B. T., Basler M., Mekalanos J. J. (2013). Type 6 secretion system-mediated immunity to type 4 secretion system-mediated gene transfer. Science 342, 250–253. 10.1126/science.1243745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ho B. T., Dong T. G., Mekalanos J. J. (2014). A view to a kill: the bacterial type VI secretion system. Cell Host Microbe 15, 9–21. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holloway B. W. (1955). Genetic recombination in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Gen. Microbiol. 13, 572–581. 10.1099/00221287-13-3-572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hood R. D., Singh P., Hsu F., Güvener T., Carl M. A., Trinidad R. R. S., et al. (2010). A type VI secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa targets a toxin to bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 7, 25–37. 10.1016/j.chom.2009.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobs M. A., Alwood A., Thaipisuttikul I., Spencer D., Haugen E., Ernst S., et al. (2003). Comprehensive transposon mutant library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 14339–14344. 10.1073/pnas.2036282100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiang F., Waterfield N. R., Yang J., Yang G., Jin Q. (2014). A Pseudomonas aeruginosa type VI secretion phospholipase D effector targets both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Cell Host Microbe 15, 600–610. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Klockgether J., Munder A., Neugebauer J., Davenport C. F., Stanke F., Larbig K. D., et al. (2010). Genome diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strains. J. Bacteriol. 192, 1113–1121. 10.1128/JB.01515-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee P.-C., Stopford C. M., Svenson A. G., Rietsch A. (2010). Control of effector export by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion proteins PcrG and PcrV. Mol. Microbiol. 75, 924–941. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07027.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lesic B., Starkey M., He J., Hazan R., Rahme L. G. (2009). Quorum sensing differentially regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa type VI secretion locus I and homologous loci II and III, which are required for pathogenesis. Microbiol. Read. Engl. 155, 2845–2855. 10.1099/mic.0.029082-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lewenza S., Falsafi R. K., Winsor G., Gooderham W. J., McPhee J. B., Brinkman F. S. L., et al. (2005). Construction of a mini-Tn5-luxCDABE mutant library in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1: a tool for identifying differentially regulated genes. Genome Res. 15, 583–589. 10.1101/gr.3513905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin J., Cheng J., Chen K., Guo C., Zhang W., Yang X., et al. (2015). The icmF3 locus is involved in multiple adaptation- and virulence-related characteristics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 5:70. 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lyczak J. B., Cannon C. L., Pier G. B. (2000). Establishment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist. Microbes Infect. Inst. Pasteur 2, 1051–1060. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01259-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ma L.-S., Narberhaus F., Lai E.-M. (2012). IcmF family protein TssM exhibits ATPase activity and energizes type VI secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 15610–15621. 10.1074/jbc.M111.301630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mougous J. D., Cuff M. E., Raunser S., Shen A., Zhou M., Gifford C. A., et al. (2006). A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312, 1526–1530. 10.1126/science.1128393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Preston M. J., Fleiszig S. M., Zaidi T. S., Goldberg J. B., Shortridge V. D., Vasil M. L., et al. (1995). Rapid and sensitive method for evaluating Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors during corneal infections in mice. Infect. Immun. 63, 3497–3501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pukatzki S., Ma A. T., Sturtevant D., Krastins B., Sarracino D., Nelson W. C., et al. (2006). Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 1528–1533. 10.1073/pnas.0510322103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Russell A. B., LeRoux M., Hathazi K., Agnello D. M., Ishikawa T., Wiggins P. A., et al. (2013). Diverse type VI secretion phospholipases are functionally plastic antibacterial effectors. Nature 496, 508–512. 10.1038/nature12074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Russell A. B., Peterson S. B., Mougous J. D. (2014). Type VI secretion system effectors: poisons with a purpose. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 137–148. 10.1038/nrmicro3185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sana T. G., Hachani A., Bucior I., Soscia C., Garvis S., Termine E., et al. (2012). The second type VI secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 is regulated by quorum sensing and Fur and modulates internalization in epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 27095–27105. 10.1074/jbc.M112.376368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stover C. K., Pham X. Q., Erwin A. L., Mizoguchi S. D., Warrener P., Hickey M. J., et al. (2000). Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406, 959–964. 10.1038/35023079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang T., Si M., Song Y., Zhu W., Gao F., Wang Y., et al. (2015). Type VI secretion system transports Zn2+ to combat multiple stresses and host immunity. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1005020. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitney J. C., Beck C. M., Goo Y. A., Russell A. B., Harding B. N., De Leon J. A., et al. (2014). Genetically distinct pathways guide effector export through the type VI secretion system. Mol. Microbiol. 92, 529–542. 10.1111/mmi.12571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES