Abstract
As a consequence of excessive antibiotic therapies in hospitalized patients, Clostridium difficile, a Gram-positive anaerobic spore-forming intestinal pathogen, is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea and colitis. Drug treatments for these diseases are often complicated by antibiotic-resistant strains and a high frequency of treatment failures and relapse; therefore, novel nonantibiotic approaches may prove to be more effective. In this study, we recombinantly expressed a prophage lysin identified from a C. difficile strain, CD630, which we named PlyCD. PlyCD was found to have lytic activity against specific C. difficile strains. However, the recombinantly expressed catalytic domain of this protein, PlyCD1–174, displayed significantly greater lytic activity (>4-log kill) and a broader lytic spectrum against C. difficile strains while still retaining a high degree of specificity toward C. difficile versus commensal clostridia and other bacterial species. Our data also indicated that noneffective doses of vancomycin and PlyCD1–174 when combined in vitro could be significantly more bactericidal against C. difficile. In an ex vivo treatment model of mouse colon infection, we found that PlyCD1–174 functioned in the presence of intestinal contents, significantly decreasing colonizing C. difficile compared to controls. Together, these data suggest that PlyCD1–174 has potential as a novel therapeutic for clinical application against C. difficile infection, either alone or in combination with other preexisting treatments to improve their efficacy.
INTRODUCTION
Clostridium difficile, a Gram-positive anaerobic spore-forming bacterium, is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea and colitis in Europe and North America (1, 2). According to a new study released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, C. difficile causes almost half a million infections in the United States per year and costs up to $4.8 billion each year in excess health care costs for acute-care facilities alone (3). The pathogen's ability to exist in spore form allows it to persist in the hospital environment, with patients and health care workers acting as the reservoirs that spread the spores and contaminate hospital rooms and equipment. When the gastrointestinal tract microbiota of a patient becomes impaired or unbalanced, most often because of antibiotic treatment, C. difficile spores germinate to the vegetative form in the colon. C. difficile pathogenesis occurs as a result of the production of two major exotoxins, TcdA and TcdB (4), which cause inflammation, tissue damage, and disruption of the mucosal barrier of the gastrointestinal tract. This damage leads to various forms of disease, from mild to moderate diarrhea and colitis to much more severe diseases such as pseudomembranous colitis and toxic megacolon, collectively called C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD). In the past decade, the emergence of new highly virulent strains, such as North American pulsed-field type 1 (NAP1/027/III) isolates, have significantly increased the severity of C. difficile infections (CDI), causing lengthy hospitalizations and substantial morbidity and mortality. In 2013, C. difficile was among the top three antibiotic-resistant bacteria that were classified as an urgent threat by CDC, drawing attention to the need for better methods of treatment and prevention of CDI (4–8).
The current standard treatment for CDAD is metronidazole or vancomycin antibiotics, which can be effective to some extent but are often accompanied with treatment failures or episodes of posttreatment relapse (1, 9–11). Data suggest that patients can have up to a 25% recurrence of CDI after antimicrobial treatment of a first episode and up to 60% recurrence after the subsequent treatments (12–14). However, highly antibiotic-resistant strains of C. difficile have emerged, further complicating treatment (15, 16). Evolving therapeutics include new antibiotics such as fidaxomycin, which have improved therapeutic effect and lead to less relapses (2), fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotic therapy, and monoclonal antibodies toward the toxins. While FMT seems to be the most effective treatment against relapsing CDI, the specific route of administration of the FMT has risks, particularly when dealing with a damaged colon, and the procedure can cause patient discomfort and is often complicated by a lack of standardization in procedures, facilities, stool processing, and donor screening (17, 18). Further, the act of transferring the fecal contents from one person to the next often dissuades some from this procedure. Results of probiotic therapy and monoclonal antibody treatment are either inconclusive or still in clinical trials, respectively (19, 20). Therefore, there is a need for new treatments which better target C. difficile without collateral damage to the protective commensal species.
In this regard, bacteriophage therapy has potential, and it has been investigated in in vitro models (21–23). To date, four temperate bacteriophages have been identified that are active against C. difficile, namely, ΦC2, ΦCD119, ΦCD27, and ΦCD6356 (24–28). While bacteriophage therapy has potential, there are many limitations that may constrain their clinical application. Bacteriophage treatment often selects for resistant mutants, and the viruses usually have a relatively narrow host range (strain specific), which has been observed with C. difficile bacteriophages (29, 30). This forces the use of a cocktail of different phages for treatment, increasing the complexity of drug development and treatment regulations.
Alternatively, using single components of bacteriophages, such as bacteriophage lytic enzymes, or endolysins, to treat infections may reduce some of these constraints. Endolysins or lysins are highly evolved molecules produced by bacteriophages to digest the bacterial cell wall for bacteriophage progeny release (31). For the past decade, phage endolysins have been widely investigated as novel antimicrobial agents to treat bacterial infections by a number of Gram-positive species. This phenomenon of “lysis from without,” utilizing bacteriophage lysins to attack pathogens, has been quite well established (32–39). Lysins normally consist of two domains: an N-terminal catalytic domain, which provides lytic activity against the host species, and a C-terminal binding domain, which binds to particular cell wall structures. The specificity of a lysin is usually dictated by the binding domain, which recognizes a cell wall feature specific to the bacteria that it targets (40).
The study of C. difficile phage lysin is still in its early stages. The only characterized C. difficile phage endolysin, CD27L, was identified in the genome of a temperate phage, ΦCD27, from C. difficile strain NCTC 12727 (27). Recombinantly expressed CD27L is active against diverse strains of C. difficile in vitro, and its lytic activity is more specific to C. difficile than to other commensal species that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. However, even though many mouse models of C. difficile infection have been developed to mimic the clinical symptoms of CDI in humans, there have been no in vivo or ex vivo studies that implement C. difficile phage lysin as an alternative therapy for treating CDI (41, 42).
In this study, we describe a putative amidase lysin, PlyCD, identified from the prophage genome of multidrug-resistant C. difficile strain CD630. The sequences of both PlyCD and its catalytic domain, PlyCD1–174, are considerably different from those for the previously described lysin specific for C. difficile (27). PlyCD and PlyCD1–174 were recombinantly expressed and purified from Escherichia coli, and their biochemical activities were characterized in vitro. We found that PlyCD1–174 was significantly more effective than PlyCD in killing C. difficile, and we exploited this effectiveness in a series of in vitro and ex vivo experiments to ascertain the effectiveness of this lysin as a new treatment for C. difficile infections or as an agent to remove residual C. difficile prior to FMT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
C. difficile strains ATCC 43255 (ribotype 087, a high-level toxin-producing strain isolated from an abdominal wound), ATCC 9689 (ribotype 001), ATCC 43598 (ribotype 017, isolated from infant stool) were obtained from ATCC. Recent clinical isolates of C. difficile, strains 112C and 139B and hypervirulent MLST2 type strains 217B and 615H, were kindly provided by Eric Pamer (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY). C. difficile strain UK1 (ribotype 027) was kindly provided by Xingmin Sun (The University of South Florida). Clostridium novyi (VPI 2383) and Clostridium perfringens (VPI 2641) were obtained from ATCC. Clostridium septicum (ATCC 12464), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC 3584), Clostridium bifermentans (ATCC 638), and Clostridium sordellii (ATCC 9714) were purchased from Microbiologics. Streptococcus pyogenes D471, group G streptococcus 14-DA, Enterococcus faecalis V583, Enterococcus faecium EFSK2, Pseudomonas aeruginosa RS1, Streptococcus suis 6112, Bacillus subtilis SL4, Bacillus anthracis 1659 and ΔSterne, Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579, Bacillus thuringiensis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 21052, Listeria monocytogenes HER 1083, and Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 belong to the Rockefeller University collection. The methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) Newman strain was obtained from Olaf Schneewind (University of Chicago, IL). The vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain IV was obtained from Alexander Tomasz (The Rockefeller University, NY). Staphylococcus epidermidis HER 1292 was obtained from Barry Kreiswirth (Public Health Research Institute, NJ). All strains were stored at −80°C and cultivated at 37°C. Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Listeria, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, and Bacillus strains were cultivated in Difco brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Spectrum). Lactobacillus strains were cultivated in de Mas, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Sigma), Escherichia coli was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (BD Biosciences). Clostridium strains were cultured in BHIS medium (BHI supplemented with yeast extract [0.5%, wt/vol] and l-cysteine [10%, wt/vol]) and incubated in a Whitley A35 anaerobic chamber (Microbiology International, MD) supplied with an anaerobic gas mixture (10% CO2, 85% N2, 5% H2) (T.W. Smith).
Subcloning of the C. difficile PlyCD gene and its subdomains.
The nucleotide sequence of PlyCD gene was acquired from the NCBI database (NCBI reference sequence YP_001088405.1), synthesized, and inserted into a pUC57 vector after codon optimization for E. coli expression (GenScript, NJ). After product verification by sequencing, the PlyCD gene insert was amplified with primer set 5′-GGAGATATATCCATGAAAGTAGTAATAATACCAGGGCACACTTTAATTG and 3′-CTAGAGGATCCCCGGTTATAATTTATCTATTTCTTGTAATGCTAATTTAACAGTTTC and subcloned into a pBAD24 expression vector using the CloneEZ PCR cloning kit (GenScript, NJ), to yield the expression vector pQW1. The catalytic domain of PlyCD, namely, PlyCD1–174, was generated by inserting a stop codon at the end of the amino acid sequence of the catalytic domain, Cys174, using a site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) with primer set 5′-CTAAACAAATCTATATCATAATTCTCAAGGGGGAGGGG and 3′-CCCCTCCCCCTTGAGAATTATGATATAGATTTGTTTAG). The binding domain of PlyCD, namely, PlyCDBD, was generated by replacing the N-terminal sequence (M1 to Q177) with a His tag followed by two E-tag (GAPVPYPDPLEPR) sequences in tandem. All constructs were transformed into NEB 5-α F′Iq competent E. coli (New England BioLabs). Positive clones were identified by colony PCR and sent for DNA sequencing (Genewiz, NJ).
Recombinant protein expression and purification.
After nucleotide sequence verification, the aforementioned clones were propagated in LB broth containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin to mid-log phase. The culture was then induced with 0.2% arabinose at 30°C overnight. Cells were then pelleted, resuspended in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing EDTA-free complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and lysed with an EmulsiFlex C-5 homogenizer (Avestin, Ottawa, Canada). Lysate debris was removed via ultracentrifugation at 4°C (17,000 rpm, 45 min), and the supernatant was sterile filtered through a 0.2-μm filter. The target protein was then purified from the supernatant with a HiTrap cation-exchange column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). Lysin was eluted using a stepwise gradient of 0.0 to 1.0 M NaCl in 20 mM phosphate buffer (PB) (pH 6.0). Extra salt was removed by filtration with a 10-kDa-cutoff Ultra Centricon (Amicon). The binding domain of PlyCD, PlyCDBD, was fused to a His tag and dual E tags at the N-terminal end and inserted into a pBAD24 vector, named pQW2. PlyCDBD was expressed from pQW2 in E. coli and purified from the whole-cell lysate using a nickel column as previous described (43). Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE to determine the purity of the lysin in each fraction. Those with high concentrations of purified lysin were collected, concentrated, and buffer exchanged against 20 mM PB (pH 7.0) via Ultra Centricon filtration (10 kDa; EMD Millipore, MA).
Lytic activity assays.
The lytic activities of C. difficile phage lysin against C. difficile strains and other bacteria were assessed based on previously described methods (44). Basically, C. difficile strains were grown to mid-log phase under anaerobic conditions, and cells were harvested by centrifugation (3,000 × g, 5 min). Pellets were washed twice and resuspended in PB to generate a final optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of approximately 0.9. The lytic activity of lysin was calculated based on reduction in OD600 as measured in 96-well plates using a SpectraMax Plus reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). For each sample, 25 μl of lysin (12.5 μM final concentration) or an equal volume of 20 mM PB was added to 180 μl of cell resuspension. The drop in OD600 at 37°C was measured once per minute for 60 min.
To study the effect of pH on the activity of lysin, the same experimental conditions and optical drop assays described above were utilized with C. difficile strain ATCC 43255 and buffers of different pH, i.e., 20 mM PB (pH 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0) or 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.0 and 5.0). To study the effect of salt and cation concentrations on the activity of lysin, PB (pH 7.0) that contained various concentrations of NaCl, KCl, MgSO4, or CaCl2 (each at 5 mM, 20 mM, 50 mM, 100 mM, or 200 mM) was used. All experiments were performed in triplicate, and results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Rhodamine labeling of lysin constructs.
N-Hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)–rhodamine (Thermo Scientific) was chemically linked to PlyCD and PlyCD1–174 following the manufacturer's instructions. The lysin construct at 1 mg was mixed with rhodamine (10 mg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) at a calculated lysin/rhodamine molar ratio of 1:10. The mixture was incubated on ice for 2 h. Excess dye was then removed by passage through a desalting column (GE Healthcare, Sweden), and fractions containing the labeled lysin were collected, pooled, and stored at 4°C until use.
Fluorescence microscopy.
Fluorescence microscopy procedures were adapted from a previously described method (43). Briefly, cells from an overnight culture of C. difficile strain ATCC 43255 were fixed with 2.6% paraformaldehyde in PB on ice for 45 min. After washing with 20 mM PB (pH 7.0), bacteria were fixed onto poly-l-lysine-coated coverslips. Attached cells were then washed with PB and blocked for 15 min with goat serum (Sigma, MO) supplemented with 1% gelatin from cold-water fish skin (Sigma, MO). To visualize the binding of PlyCD and PlyCD1–174 to C. difficile, rhodamine-conjugated full-length PlyCD or rhodamine-conjugated PlyCD1–174 was added to the slides, left for 10 min, and then washed with PB. To visualize the binding of PlyCDBD, cells were pretreated either with or without unlabeled PlyCD1–174 for 10 min and then washed 3 times with PB. Recombinantly expressed PlyCDBD containing dual E tags was then added to the slides, left for 10 min, and washed again with PB. Following this, cells were sequentially incubated with rabbit anti-E-tag antibody (Abcam) for 1 h at a 1:500 dilution and anti-rabbit–fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Sigma, MO) at a 1:1,000 dilution, with 3 PB washes in between. All slides were sealed with coverslips and mounting medium before viewing under the microscope (Eclipse E400; Nikon, Japan).
Collaborative effect of PlyCD1–174 and vancomycin.
To highlight the role of C. difficile lysin PlyCD1–174 in combination with vancomycin, a preparation of lysin with low lytic activity was used in this experiment (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). An overnight culture of C. difficile ATCC 43255 was diluted to 1 × 107 CFU/ml in BHIS medium and divided into two equal volumes, one of which was pretreated with 10 μg/ml vancomycin (Sigma, MO) for 20 min. Both sets were then centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 5 min and resuspended in 50 mM PB (pH 7.0). The resuspended cells were treated with 25 μg, 12.5 μg, 6.25 μg, or 3.125 μg of PlyCD1–174 in 250 μl PB for 30 min under anaerobic conditions. Cells from each treatment were then plated on a BHIS agar plate and incubated overnight for CFU enumeration.
In vivo murine model.
The Rockefeller University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all in vivo protocols. All experiments were conducted at The Rockefeller University's animal housing facility, an AAALAC-accredited research facility, with all efforts to minimize suffering. All mice used in the experiments were housed in groups of 5 per cage. Autoclaved drinking water, bedding, and cages were changed every day. Chow food was radiated and kept in individual packs. Six-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME).
Preparation of C. difficile spores.
An overnight culture of C. difficile strain VPI 10463 (ATCC 43255, a high-level toxin-producing strain) was inoculated into Difco cooked meat broth (BD Diagnostic Systems, MD) and incubated at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber. After 5 days, the meat broth culture was filtered through a sterile cell strainer (40 μM; Fisher) to remove large meat particles. C. difficile spores in the flowthrough were then pelleted by centrifugation (4,000 rpm, 5 min). The pellet was resuspended, washed 3 times in PB, and heated at 80°C for 30 min. Spores were then pelleted again and resuspended in PB at a final concentration of 1 × 107 spores/ml.
C. difficile murine infection model.
The protocol used to establish the in vivo murine CDI model was modified from a method previously described by Chen et al. (42). An antibiotic mixture of kanamycin (0.4 mg/ml), gentamicin (0.035 mg/ml), colistin (850 U/ml), metronidazole (0.215 mg/ml), and vancomycin (0.045 mg/ml) was prepared in drinking water (all antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Mice were allowed to drink the antibiotic cocktail ad libitum for 5 days and then regular autoclaved water for 2 days. Next, mice received a single dose of clindamycin (20 mg/kg) intraperitoneally 1 day before C. difficile challenge. At day zero, mice were inoculated with 200 μl of 107 CFU/ml C. difficile spores via gavage. Noninfected control mice were given PB via gavage instead of spores. The actual spore inoculation titer was verified by serial dilution and plating to BHIS plates containing 10% (wt/vol) taurocholate acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for each experiment. At 24 h and 48 h after spore gavage, 400 μg of PlyCD1–174 or PB (vehicle alone) was delivered intrarectally to mice under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. Intrarectal injection was performed by inserting 20-gauge polyethylene gavage tubing (Braintree Scientific, MA) about 3.5 cm proximal to the anus. A total volume of approximately 250 μl was injected via a syringe attached to the gavage tubing. Mice were then held in a head-down vertical position for 1 min after the administration to ensure that the entire volume remained in the colon. Noninfected control mice were also treated intrarectally with 400 μg of PlyCD1–174 to test the safety of the lysin. All mice were followed for 7 days, with daily monitoring for weight loss, diarrhea, morbidity, and mortality. Mouse survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves using the Prism computer program (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
Ex vivo treatment of C. difficile colon infection.
Mice were purchased and treated with antibiotic cocktails in the same fashion and fed with 200 μl of 107CFU/ml C. difficile ATCC 43255 spores as described for the in vivo model, except that mice were euthanized 48 h after spore gavage. The colon from each mouse was then excised and further processed in an anaerobic chamber, where it was cut into small (approximately 3-mm) tissue segments. Tissue pieces from each infected mouse colon that were free of solid stool pellets were randomly divided into two equal sets, which were mixed with either 250 μl of 500 μg PlyCD1–174 diluted in previously reduced (by incubating in an anaerobic chamber) PB buffer or reduced PB vehicle in separate Stomacher 80 Biomaster bags, whose contents became isolated from oxygen once liquid was added. Lysin-treated and nontreated tissues from the same mouse were processed simultaneously in a Stomacher Biomaster (Seward, United Kingdom) for 90 s to ensure sufficient mixing between buffer and colon tissue. The bags were then placed back inside an anaerobic chamber for incubation. After 1 h, an aliquot from each bag was sampled, diluted, and plated onto BHIS agar plates containing C. difficile selective supplement SR0096 (Thermo Scientific, United Kingdom). Plates were incubated in the anaerobic chamber for 24 h to determine CFU. Differences in bacterial survival between the control and treated groups were analyzed statistically by Student's t test using Prism.
RESULTS
Sequence alignment.
Through online database searches, we identified the sequence of a putative phage lysin (NCBI reference sequence YP_001088405.1) (Fig. 1A) from a prophage in C. difficile strain 630 and termed it PlyCD (Phage lysin from C. difficile). The sequences of PlyCD and its catalytic domain PlyCD1–174 were compared with those for the sequence of the previously described C. difficile lysin CD27L (Fig. 1B and C). There was 33% identity in amino acid sequence between PlyCD and CD27L and 34.6% identity between the catalytic domain of PlyCD (PlyCD1–174) and CD27L, indicating that PlyCD is a unique C. difficile lysin.
FIG 1.
Amino acid sequence of PlyCD. (A) Full sequence of PlyCD with the catalytic domain highlighted in red; (B) amino acid sequence alignment of PlyCD with a previously described C difficile lysin, CD27L (27); (C) amino acid sequence alignment of the PlyCD catalytic domain, PlyCD1–174, with the catalytic domain of CD27L (double dots symbolize identity, single dots symbolize similarity, and dashes represent gaps in the alignment).
Expression and purification of PlyCD and PlyCD1–174 from E. coli.
The DNA sequences of PlyCD and PlyCD1–174 were separately cloned into a pBAD24 expression vector, and after arabinose induction, the whole-cell lysates of PlyCD or PlyCD1–174, were individually purified by cation-exchange chromatography. Eluted fractions that contained the purified target proteins (PlyCD [28 kDa] and PlyCD1–174 [20 kDa]) were pooled and run on SDS-PAGE to reveal that both final purified products were >90% pure (Fig. 2A and B). The average yield for both lysins was about 5 mg protein per liter of E. coli culture. These purified molecules were used in all subsequent experiments.
FIG 2.

Purification of PlyCD and PlyCD1–174. (A) Gel analysis of the final purified PlyCD. Lanes: 1, Precision dual-color protein standard (Bio-Rad); 2, purified PlyCD. (B) Gel analysis of the final purified PlyCD1–174. Lanes: 1, Precision dual-color protein standard (Bio-Rad); 2, purified PlyCD1–174.
Molecular characterization of PlyCD. (i) Effects of pH and salt.
The activity of a lysin is often affected by salt concentration, cations, and pH. To investigate the lytic activity of PlyCD under various conditions, the reduction in the OD600 of C. difficile suspensions was monitored over 60 min. PlyCD displayed the strongest activity at pH 7.0 and pH 8.0 (Fig. 3A), showed moderate activity at pH 6.0, and lost lytic activity at pH 5.0 and pH 4.0. To test salt sensitivity, the lytic activity of PlyCD was measured with different NaCl concentrations. While PlyCD displayed equivalent lytic activity at the end of 60 min for all concentrations tested (0 to 100 mM NaCl), greater lytic activity was observed during the initial 20 min of the reaction with increasing concentrations of NaCl (Fig. 3B). At 200 mM NaCl, the lytic activity of PlyCD was inhibited. At 400 mM NaCl, C. difficile start to display autolysis, making analysis at or above this concentration unreliable (data not shown).
FIG 3.
Molecular characterization of PlyCD activity. (A) Effect of pH on the lytic activity of PlyCD by analysis of OD600 decrease over time, Closed symbols, PlyCD treatment; open symbols, buffer controls. (B) Effect of different concentrations of NaCl on the lytic activity of PlyCD. (C) Substrate specificity of PlyCD among clostridia. The ratios between the OD600 values of PlyCD-treated against buffer-treated bacteria were determined at 30 min (open bars) and 60 min (closed bars) postreaction; all results are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) from duplicate assays. The standard deviation was plotted for all experiments; however, the error bars may sometimes be too small to be seen.
(ii) Host specificity.
Though phage lysins with broader activity do exist (34), lysins generally exhibit high specificity (45), displaying elevated activity against a few closely related species. To study the specificity of PlyCD, we tested its lytic action against multiple C. difficile strains and Clostridium spp. All species were cultured anaerobically until mid-exponential phase, washed, and resuspended in 20 mM PB, pH 7.0. PlyCD was then added to the bacterial suspensions at a final concentration of 12.5 μM (50 μg), and the OD600 values of each culture were recorded over 60 min. The ratio of OD600 at 30 and 60 min versus time zero was calculated. Of all the Clostridium spp. tested, PlyCD demonstrated the most effective lytic activity against C. difficile strain ATCC 43255 and had moderate activity against two clinical strains 139B and 112C. Interestingly, the full-length lysin did not have activity against the other Clostridium spp. tested or against C. difficile strains ATCC 9689 and ATCC 43598, suggesting that the full-length PlyCD has a very specific and narrow range of activity against C. difficile strains (Fig. 3C).
Molecular characterization of the catalytic domain of PlyCD.
Similar to the intact PlyCD, PlyCD1–174 also displayed very effective lytic efficiency at neutral to basic pH, (i.e., pH 6.0, pH 7.0, and pH 8.0) (Fig. 4A) and no activity below pH 5.0. The salt sensitivity of PlyCD1–174, was also similar to that of PlyCD, where PlyCD1–174 had maximum lytic activity in the absence of NaCl (Fig. 4B). A similar pattern was also observed in the presence of KCl (Fig. 4C). The lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 was more sensitive to the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ than to that of Na+ and K+ cations. A trace amount of MgSO4 significantly inhibited the lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 (Fig. 4D). A similar event was observed with CaCl2 (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). For subsequent experiments, PlyCD1–174 was used in 20 mM PB at pH 7.0.
FIG 4.
Molecular characterization of PlyCD1–174 activity. (A) Effect of pH on the lytic activity of PlyCD1–174. Closed symbols, PlyCD1–174 treatment; open symbols, buffer control. (B) Effect of different NaCl concentrations on the lytic activity of PlyCD1–174. Closed symbols, PlyCD1–174 treatment; open symbols, buffer control. (C) Effect of different KCl concentrations on the lytic activity of PlyCD1–174. Closed symbols, PlyCD1–174 treatment; open symbols, buffer control. (D) Effect of different MgSO4 concentrations on the lytic activity of PlyCD1–174. Closed symbols, PlyCD1–174 treatment; open symbols, buffer control. All experiments were performed using C. difficile ATCC 43255, and results expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) from duplicate assays.
The lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 was directly compared to that of PlyCD by measuring the change in OD600 of a C. difficile (ATCC 43255) suspension over 60 min (Fig. 5). While the OD600 value of the buffer control did not change in 60 min, the OD600 of samples treated with 12.5 μM (50 μg) PlyCD displayed an ∼30% decrease after 30 min compared to the initial OD value, and baseline was not achieved until ∼60 min. In contrast, the OD600 of PlyCD1–174 dropped significantly and quickly when 12.5 μM (50 μg) PlyCD was added to the bacterial cells (Fig. 5A), and within 20 min, the OD600 value dropped to baseline. This comparison showed that PlyCD1–174 has greater lytic activity toward C. difficile than full-length PlyCD; therefore, PlyCD1–174 was chosen for subsequent experiments.
FIG 5.
Effect of truncation on lytic activity. (A) Comparison of the lytic activities of PlyCD1–174 (closed circles) and PlyCD (triangles) against C. difficile. Open circles, buffer control. Lysis assay mixtures comprised cells incubated with 50 μg purified protein or PB. (B) The lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 functions in a dose-dependent manner against C. difficile. (C) Lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 determined by the decrease in C. difficile titer (80 μg of PlyCD1–174 per sample was used in the assay). All experiments were performed using C. difficile ATCC 43255, and results are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) from duplicate assays. The standard deviation was plotted for all experiments; however, the error bars may sometimes be too small to be seen.
To further evaluate the lytic activity of the catalytic domain, various concentrations of PlyCD1–174, were mixed with C. difficile ATCC 43255, and the OD600 was monitored over 60 min. The results revealed that the lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 functions in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). To determine the direct bactericidal activity of PlyCD1–174 on C. difficile cells, 80 μg of PlyCD1–174 was mixed with 108/ml C. difficile ATCC 43255 in PB. The cell suspension was incubated anaerobically for 30 and 60 min, and at each time point the surviving bacteria were plated for enumeration. After 30 and 60 min of lysin exposure, 3- and 4-log reductions, respectively, in C. difficile survival were observed (Fig. 5C).
Host specificity of PlyCD1–174.
PlyCD1–174 was tested against a variety of C. difficile strains, other clostridia, and non-Clostridium species. All species were cultured until mid-exponential phase, washed, and resuspended in 20 mM PB, pH 7.0. PlyCD1–174 was added to the buffer at a final concentration of 12.5 μM (50 μg). Unlike the full-length molecule, PlyCD1–174 displayed strong activity in an OD600 reduction assay against all of the C. difficile reference laboratory strains tested, i.e., ATCC 43255, ATCC 9689, and ATCC 43598, as well as two clinical strains, 139B and 112C, and two clinical hypervirulent strains, 217B and 615H, but not against other Clostridium spp. tested, with the exception of C. sordellii (Fig. 6A). This indicates that PlyCD1–174 has better lytic activity against a wider C. difficile strain spectrum than PlyCD, yet it is not active against other potential intestinal Clostridium spp., such as C. novyi, C. perfringens, C. bifermentans, C. sporogenes, and C. septicum. The lytic activity of PlyCD1–174 against hypervirulent MLST2 strains 217B, 615H, and UK1 (R027) was further verified by the CFU reduction assay (Fig. 6B). In 60 min, the CFU of all the hypervirulent strains tested decreased over 4 logs in the presence of 120 μg of PlyCD1–174. This reduction was dose dependent and comparable to what was found with the other laboratory reference strains. To determine if PlyCD1–174 is effective against other, non-Clostridium species, strains of Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, Lactobacillus, and Listeria were also tested. Except for B. subtilis, PlyCD1–174 did not display lytic activity, as determined by OD600 reduction, against any of these other species (Fig. 6C). These data suggest that compared to PlyCD, PlyCD1–174 is more active against many C. difficile strains while still retaining a majority of its species specificity.
FIG 6.
Substrate specificity of PlyCD1–174. (A) The ratios between the OD600 values of PlyCD1–174-treated against buffer-treated Clostridium strains were determined at 30 min (open bars) and 60 min (closed bars) postreaction. (B) Comparison of CFU changes between hypervirulent clinical strains and the laboratory strain with different doses of PlyCD1–174 over the course of 60 min. (C) The ratios between PlyCD1–174-treated and buffer-treated non-Clostridium strains were determined at 30 min (open bars) and 60 min (closed bars) postreaction. Results are the means ± standard deviations (SD) from duplicate assays.
Collaborative effect of lysin and vancomycin.
Vancomycin, an antibiotic that inhibits cell wall synthesis, is often used to treat severe forms of C. difficile infection as the first-line drug. The minimal recommended trough concentration in adults is 5 to 10 μg/ml (46). To explore whether there could be a synergistic therapeutic effect of PlyCD1–174 and a low dose of vancomycin, 1 × 107 CFU/ml of C. difficile (ATCC 43255) was grown in the presence of a minimal physiological trough concentration of vancomycin (10 μg/ml) or medium alone for 20 min. The cells were then centrifuged, resuspended in 50 mM PB (pH 7.0), and treated with a series of low doses of PlyCD1–174 or buffer control for 30 min before being plated to enumerate CFU. We found that by themselves, neither the minimal trough dose of vancomycin nor the low doses of lysin reduced the titer of C. difficile; however, cells pretreated with vancomycin and then 25 μg of lysin were significantly reduced, by two logs, and this response appeared to be lysin dose dependent (Fig. 7).
FIG 7.

Collaborative effect of PlyCD1–174 and vancomycin. C. difficile cells (1 × 107) were pretreated with or without 10 μg/ml vancomycin for 20 min and then were centrifuged and subjected to increasing amounts of PlyCD1–174 in 50 mM PB (to help approximate the local intestinal ionic environment) for 30 min (3.125 μg, 6.25 μg, 12.5 μg, and 25 μg). CFU of remaining bacteria from each treatment group were counted after overnight incubation. Results are the means ± standard deviations (SD) from duplicate assays.
Reduction of C. difficile bacteria in mouse colon by ex vivo treatment.
In a mouse model of C. difficile intestinal disease, we attempted to treat the infected colon with PlyCD1–174 delivered rectally by enema (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material). However, due to the unpredictable presence of solid fecal stool pellets in the mouse colons, despite severe diarrheal disease, lysin could not be reliably distributed in an effective manner throughout the infected colon, resulting in inconsistent results. Thus, a C. difficile mouse in vivo infection model could not adequately serve as an appropriate platform to determine the therapeutic effect of lysin enema (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material). Therefore, to continue to pursue whether C. difficile infection could be controlled by PlyCD1–174 in a colonic environment, we modified the in vivo infection model to develop an ex vivo mouse treatment model. In this model, we asked whether the PlyCD1–174 lysin was able to function and kill C. difficile vegetative cells in the mouse colonic environment and whether there were any inhibitory substances that would block its activity. Two days after C. difficile infection, mouse large intestines between the cecum and anus were excised and divided into two groups to be treated with either PlyCD1–174 or PB alone (Fig. 8A). In a 500-μl total reaction volume, 600 μg of PlyCD1–174 decreased the titer of intestinal C. difficile from an average of 6.5 ×106 CFU/ml to 5.2 ×104 CFU/ml and 4.5 ×104 CFU/ml (>2 logs) after 30 and 60 min of incubation, respectively (Fig. 8B). Since the intestinal volume between the cecum and anus of a 6- to 8-week-old mouse is about 250 μl (unpublished results), we repeated the experiment by adding 250 μl PB to the intestinal pieces with or without 600 μg PlyCD1–174 to be more physiologically relevant. Intestines that were treated with 250 μl of PlyCD1–174 also displayed an approximate two-log decrease in C. difficile CFU after 60 min of incubation (Fig. 8C). These data suggest that PlyCD1–174 is active against C. difficile vegetative cells infecting the large intestine in the presence of its contents.
FIG 8.
PlyCD1–174 decreases C. difficile colonization of mice colons in an ex vivo treatment model. (A) Schematics of the experimental design. (B and C) Decrease in C. difficile titer after 30 and 60 min of PlyCD1–174 treatment compared to controls (n = 11 [B] or 7 [C]). After antibiotic treatment, C57BL/6 mice were fed 107 spores by gavage at day 0. At day 2 postinfection, mice were euthanized and colons removed and cut into 3-mm tissue pieces, which were equally divided into 2 sealed plastic pouches containing 500 μl (B) or 250 μl (C) of reduced PB or PlyCD1–174 (1 mg/ml). Tissues were then homogenized for 90 s, incubated anaerobically for 1 h, and plated to BHIS agar to enumerate CFU. Data from two independent experiments were combined and analyzed for statistical significance with the Student t test. Means ± SDs are shown.
DISCUSSION
C. difficile infection (CDI) is the major identifiable cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis in hospitals. The potential use of bacteriophage endolysins as treatment against bacterial infections has long been recognized since their initial discovery (47), and they have been used against a number of different human pathogens in a variety of animal models (38, 47, 48). In this study, we characterized a novel C. difficile endolysin (PlyCD) and its catalytic domain PlyCD1–174.
PlyCD1–174 displayed stronger lytic activity than the full-length PlyCD containing both the catalytic and binding domains. The role of the binding domain is to bind tightly to its cell wall receptor and provide specificity, thus positioning the catalytic domain adjacent to its substrate for cleavage. While some lysins require the binding region for activity (49), other catalytic domains have been reported to work equally well or better on their own (50). This feature was also found in the only other characterized C. difficile lysin, CD27L (27). However, the reason for the increased activity of the CD27L catalytic subunit was not explored in the previous report (27). Since lysins are utilized by the phage to act from the inside a bacterial cell wall to release its viral progeny, structures on the outer surface of the C. difficile cell could hinder peptidoglycan accessibility of the entire lysin when it is added from the outside. The presence of secondary structures on the cell surface, such as S-layer proteins, of which C. difficile has several, could act as a filter preventing the larger PlyCD from entering the wall (51). Furthermore, other, nonsteric cell wall factors could reduce the ability of PlyCD to bind to the cell. Our microscopic analysis of fluorescently tagged PlyCD showed that PlyCD bound intact C. difficile cells poorly, with fluorescence found only on cells that were degraded (see the supplemental material), suggesting that the binding receptor in the wall was not surface accessible. Previous studies have observed a correlation between the positive charge on a lysin's catalytic domain and its bactericidal activity in the absence of the binding domain, where an inactive catalytic domain, without a binding domain, was made active by engineering it to have more of a positive net charge (52). Likewise, the pIs of the catalytic domain and binding domain of PlyCD are 8.78 and 5.76, respectively, making the pI of the full-length protein 8.31. Thus, in a reaction buffer of pH 7.0, the catalytic domain would assume a greater net positive charge than the full-length protein. This difference in the net charge between PlyCD and its catalytic domain may help explain the difference in their lytic activity and host range.
Unlike antibiotics, endolysins, such as PlyCD, display high specificity for their substrates (53). Compared to the low activity against other commensal gut flora tested, such as C. septicum, C. novyi, E. faecalis, E. faecium, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, the catalytic domain of PlyCD had almost exclusively strong lytic activity against C. difficile, which included multiple ribotypes and toxin types of laboratory reference strains and highly virulent recent clinical isolates of C. difficile. The only exceptions were the lytic activities against B. subtilis and C. sordellii, suggesting a cell wall structure very similar to that of C. difficile (54). This high specificity has also been seen in other bacteriophage lysins, making them suitable candidates for clinical treatment of bacterial infections (31, 32, 48). Our in vitro specificity results suggest that intestinal delivery of PlyCD1–174 should have a minimal effect on the commensal bacterial population, thus reducing potential complications seen with antibiotics.
Synergism between lysins and antibiotics has been shown previously in the growth inhibition of facultative anaerobic bacteria (33, 55). However, no synergism has been shown in the growth inhibition of strict anaerobic bacteria, possibly due to the challenge of maintaining the growth of anaerobic bacteria in minimal media. To evaluate whether there is a synergistic effect with PlyCD1–174 and an antibiotic, we developed an in vitro assay to determine the bactericidal effect of PlyCD1–174 and vancomycin. Under conditions of minimal concentration and exposure time, neither vancomycin nor PlyCD1–174 alone significantly killed C. difficile. However, when the bacteria were pretreated for a short period with a minimal dose of vancomycin and then exposed to a minimal dose of PlyCD1–174, there was a significant killing of C. difficile (>2-logs). These data suggest that a collaborative effect between vancomycin and lysin does exist and that C. difficile organisms exposed to vancomycin (the standard of care for CDI) could be sensitized to sublytic doses of lysin.
For the past 5 years, several mouse models of CDI have been established successfully, including a gnotobiotic model (56), an antibiotic cocktail model (42), a single-antibiotic model (57), and even a CDI relapse model (41). However, our mouse C. difficile infection model did not seem to be ideal for evaluating rectally applied therapeutics. In this study, we administered an enema of PlyCD1–174 into the colons of C. difficile-infected mice in an attempt to reduce CDAD mortality. Our initial data showed that delivery of 400 μg lysin via enema resulted in no gross abnormal effects, such as diarrhea or mouse weight loss in uninfected controls (see Fig. S6B in the supplemental material). Further analysis of C. difficile-infected mice showed that compared to buffer-treated controls, the lysin-treaded mice showed an increase in survival and a delay in the rate of morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the results were possibly confounded by the nature of the mouse model. Mice were often variable in the rates of C. difficile disease symptoms, and though some had wet perianal regions from diarrhea, the presence of solid stools in their colons was often randomly found upon necropsy. These stool pellets prevented the distribution of the lysin into the entire colon and made it difficult to consistently deliver an accurate volume of the enema into the rectum, thus hindering the protective effect of lysin and affecting the proper evaluation of the efficacy of PlyCD1–174 in the colons of these mice. An unblocked colon is critical to any rectal delivery of drug or FMT and can be more easily achieved, observed, and confirmed in human procedures, Unfortunately, we found it difficult to fully accomplish this in mice, possibly due to differences in diet, physiology, morphology, and/or size of the colons. We attempted to eliminate hard stools in the colons by feeding mice a liquid diet and/or laxatives before infection, but we were unsuccessful. Therefore, we established an ex vivo treatment model, where colons were removed from infected mice and only colons from mice who had enough disease to have loose stools were treated with lysin or control buffer. In this model, we were able to show that the PlyCD1–174 lysin functioned effectively in the presence of the infected large intestinal environment, significantly killing the colonized C. difficile organisms by >2 logs compared to the vehicle buffer control.
Because the use of antibiotics is often unsuccessful in curing CDI, FMT has emerged as a second-line therapy for recurrent CDI. While almost 90% successful, transplantation failures in which C. difficile is not fully cleared from the individuals do occur (58). The success rates of FMT may be increased by reducing residual C. difficile remaining in the colon prior to administering the transplant; thus, lysin treatment of the colon prior to delivery of the transplant may prove effective. The idea of removing residual C. difficile prior to transplantation is supported by a randomized controlled trial of treatment of recurrent CDI (59), where colon lavage before FMT was significantly more effective (81%) at resolving CDI than FMT without bowel lavage (23%) or after vancomycin treatment (31%). Additionally, since PlyCD1–174 may have little effect on normal commensal bacteria, including Clostridia species, the lysin could also be combined with the donor fecal microbiota and delivered with the FMT. Thus, PlyCD1–174 treatment could represent another weapon in combating CDI, utilizing lysin either alone, in combination with antibiotics, or alongside FMT therapies to increase their efficacy and prevent CDI recurrence.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank ContraFect Corp. for partial support of this project and the Bridges to Better Medicine Technology Innovation Fund to C.W.E. and V.A.F. for partial support as well. This project was also cosponsored by the Iris and Junming Le Foundation and the Rockefeller Center for Clinical and Translational Science (RUCCTS) grant UL1 TR000043 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS, National Institutes of Health [NIH] Clinical and Translational Science Award [CTSA] program).
We thank Eric Pamer from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for kindly providing us the clinical strains. We thank Chandrabali Ghose-Paul from Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center for her assistance and advice with the C. difficile animal infection model. We also thank Yun Mariana from Hunter College for her excellent technical contributions to this project.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01357-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Heinlen L, Ballard JD. 2010. Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Med Sci 340:247–252. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181e939d8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Penziner S, Dubrovskaya Y, Press R, Safdar A. 2015. Fidaxomicin therapy in critically ill patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1776–1781. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04268-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.CDC. 2015, posting date. http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/organisms/cdiff/Cdiff_infect.html. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bartlett JG. 2006. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann Intern Med 145:758–764. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elliott B, Chang BJ, Golledge CL, Riley TV. 2007. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Intern Med J 37:561–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01403.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, Oughton M, Libman MD, Michaud S, Bourgault AM, Nguyen T, Frenette C, Kelly M, Vibien A, Brassard P, Fenn S, Dewar K, Hudson TJ, Horn R, Rene P, Monczak Y, Dascal A. 2005. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med 353:2442–2449. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.MacCannell DR, Louie TJ, Gregson DB, Laverdiere M, Labbe AC, Laing F, Henwick S. 2006. Molecular analysis of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 isolates from eastern and western Canada. J Clin Microbiol 44:2147–2152. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02563-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Warny M, Pepin J, Fang A, Killgore G, Thompson A, Brazier J, Frost E, McDonald LC. 2005. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet 366:1079–1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67420-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leffler DA, Lamont JT. 2009. Treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 136:1899–1912. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Monaghan T, Boswell T, Mahida YR. 2008. Recent advances in Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gut 57:850–860. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.128157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pepin J, Alary ME, Valiquette L, Raiche E, Ruel J, Fulop K, Godin D, Bourassa C. 2005. Increasing risk of relapse after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect Dis 40:1591–1597. doi: 10.1086/430315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Surawicz CM, Alexander J. 2011. Treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:330–339. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31:431–455. doi: 10.1086/651706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Barbut F, Richard A, Hamadi K, Chomette V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. 2000. Epidemiology of recurrences or reinfections of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 38:2386–2388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alzahrani N, Johani SA. 2013. Emergence of a highly resistant Clostridium difficile strain (NAP/BI/027) in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 33:198–199. doi: 10.5144/0256.4947.2013.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang JS, Jiang ZD, Garey KW, Lasco T, Dupont HL. 2013. Use of rifamycin drugs and development of infection by rifamycin-resistant strains of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:2690–2693. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00548-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rohlke F, Stollman N. 2012. Fecal microbiota transplantation in relapsing Clostridium difficile infection. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 5:403–420. doi: 10.1177/1756283X12453637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Agito MD, Atreja A, Rizk MK. 2013. Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent C difficile infection: ready for prime time? Cleveland Clin J Med 80:101–108. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.80a.12110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hell M, Bernhofer C, Stalzer P, Kern JM, Claassen E. 2013. Probiotics in Clostridium difficile infection: reviewing the need for a multistrain probiotic. Beneficial Microbes 4:39–51. doi: 10.3920/BM2012.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.O'Horo JC, Jindai K, Kunzer B, Safdar N. 2014. Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. Infection 42:43–59. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0496-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parisien A, Allain B, Zhang J, Mandeville R, Lan CQ. 2008. Novel alternatives to antibiotics: bacteriophages, bacterial cell wall hydrolases, and antimicrobial peptides. J Appl Microbiol 104:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Petty NK, Evans TJ, Fineran PC, Salmond GP. 2007. Biotechnological exploitation of bacteriophage research. Trends Biotechnol 25:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meader E, Mayer MJ, Gasson MJ, Steverding D, Carding SR, Narbad A. 2010. Bacteriophage treatment significantly reduces viable Clostridium difficile and prevents toxin production in an in vitro model system. Anaerobe 16:549–554. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goh S, Riley TV, Chang BJ. 2005. Isolation and characterization of temperate bacteriophages of Clostridium difficile. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1079–1083. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.1079-1083.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goh S, Ong PF, Song KP, Riley TV, Chang BJ. 2007. The complete genome sequence of Clostridium difficile phage phiC2 and comparisons to phiCD119 and inducible prophages of CD630. Microbiology 153:676–685. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/002436-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Govind R, Fralick JA, Rolfe RD. 2006. Genomic organization and molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile bacteriophage PhiCD119. J Bacteriol 188:2568–2577. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.7.2568-2577.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mayer MJ, Narbad A, Gasson MJ. 2008. Molecular characterization of a Clostridium difficile bacteriophage and its cloned biologically active endolysin. J Bacteriol 190:6734–6740. doi: 10.1128/JB.00686-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Horgan M, O'Sullivan O, Coffey A, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D, McAuliffe O, Ross RP. 2010. Genome analysis of the Clostridium difficile phage PhiCD6356, a temperate phage of the Siphoviridae family. Gene 462:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mahony DE, Bell PD, Easterbrook KB. 1985. Two bacteriophages of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 21:251–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nagy E, Foldes J. 1991. Electron microscopic investigation of lysogeny of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from antibiotic-associated diarrhea cases and from healthy carriers. APMIS 99:321–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1991.tb05156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fischetti VA. 2005. Bacteriophage lytic enzymes: novel anti-infectives. Trends Microbiol 13:491–496. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nelson D, Schuch R, Chahales P, Zhu S, Fischetti VA. 2006. PlyC: a multimeric bacteriophage lysin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:10765–10770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604521103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Daniel A, Euler C, Collin M, Chahales P, Gorelick KJ, Fischetti VA. 2010. Synergism between a novel chimeric lysin and oxacillin protects against infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:1603–1612. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01625-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gilmer DB, Schmitz JE, Euler CW, Fischetti VA. 2013. Novel bacteriophage lysin with broad lytic activity protects against mixed infection by Streptococcus pyogenes and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:2743–2750. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02526-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schuch R, Pelzek AJ, Raz A, Euler CW, Ryan PA, Winer BY, Farnsworth A, Bhaskaran SS, Stebbins CE, Xu Y, Clifford A, Bearss DJ, Vankayalapati H, Goldberg AR, Fischetti VA. 2013. Use of a bacteriophage lysin to identify a novel target for antimicrobial development. PLoS One 8:e60754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fenton M, Ross RP, McAuliffe O, O'Mahony J, Coffey A. 2011. Characterization of the staphylococcal bacteriophage lysin CHAP(K). J Appl Microbiol 111:1025–1035. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Resch G, Moreillon P, Fischetti VA. 2011. A stable phage lysin (Cpl-1) dimer with increased antipneumococcal activity and decreased plasma clearance. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:516–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pastagia M, Euler C, Chahales P, Fuentes-Duculan J, Krueger JG, Fischetti VA. 2011. A novel chimeric lysin shows superiority to mupirocin for skin decolonization of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:738–744. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00890-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schuch R, Nelson D, Fischetti VA. 2002. A bacteriolytic agent that detects and kills Bacillus anthracis. Nature 418:884–889. doi: 10.1038/nature01026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Loessner MJ. 2005. Bacteriophage endolysins—current state of research and applications. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:480–487. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sun X, Wang H, Zhang Y, Chen K, Davis B, Feng H. 2011. Mouse relapse model of Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Immun 79:2856–2864. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01336-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen X, Katchar K, Goldsmith JD, Nanthakumar N, Cheknis A, Gerding DN, Kelly CP. 2008. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 135:1984–1992. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Raz A, Fischetti VA. 2008. Sortase A localizes to distinct foci on the Streptococcus pyogenes membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:18549–18554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808301105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yoong P, Schuch R, Nelson D, Fischetti VA. 2004. Identification of a broadly active phage lytic enzyme with lethal activity against antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. J Bacteriol 186:4808–4812. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4808-4812.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fischetti VA. 2008. Bacteriophage lysins as effective antibacterials. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Root RK. 1999. Clinical infectious diseases: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Inc., Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nelson D, Loomis L, Fischetti VA. 2001. Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:4107–4112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061038398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lood R, Raz A, Molina H, Euler CW, Fischetti VA. 2014. A highly active and negatively charged Streptococcus pyogenes lysin with a rare d-alanyl-l-alanine endopeptidase activity protects mice against streptococcal bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3073–3084. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00115-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Porter CJ, Schuch R, Pelzek AJ, Buckle AM, McGowan S, Wilce MC, Rossjohn J, Russell R, Nelson D, Fischetti VA, Whisstock JC. 2007. The 1.6 A crystal structure of the catalytic domain of PlyB, a bacteriophage lysin active against Bacillus anthracis. J Mol Biol 366:540–550. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Low LY, Yang C, Perego M, Osterman A, Liddington RC. 2005. Structure and lytic activity of a Bacillus anthracis prophage endolysin. J Biol Chem 280:35433–35439. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502723200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Meroueh SO, Bencze KZ, Hesek D, Lee M, Fisher JF, Stemmler TL, Mobashery S. 2006. Three-dimensional structure of the bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:4404–4409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510182103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Low LY, Yang C, Perego M, Osterman A, Liddington R. 2011. Role of net charge on catalytic domain and influence of cell wall binding domain on bactericidal activity, specificity, and host range of phage lysins. J Biol Chem 286:34391–34403. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.244160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim JS, Ward KK, Shah NR, Saenz CC, McHale MT, Plaxe SC. 2013. Excess risk of Clostridium difficile infection in ovarian cancer is related to exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Support Care Cancer 21:3103–3107. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1888-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mayer MJ, Garefalaki V, Spoerl R, Narbad A, Meijers R. 2011. Structure-based modification of a Clostridium difficile-targeting endolysin affects activity and host range. J Bacteriol 193:5477–5486. doi: 10.1128/JB.00439-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schmelcher M, Powell AM, Camp MJ, Pohl CS, Donovan DM. 2015. Synergistic streptococcal phage lambdaSA2 and B30 endolysins kill streptococci in cow milk and in a mouse model of mastitis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:8475–8486. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6579-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pawlowski SW, Calabrese G, Kolling GL, Platts-Mills J, Freire R, AlcantaraWarren C, Liu B, Sartor RB, Guerrant RL. 2010. Murine model of Clostridium difficile infection with aged gnotobiotic C57BL/6 mice and a BI/NAP1 strain. J Infect Dis 202:1708–1712. doi: 10.1086/657086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Theriot CM, Koumpouras CC, Carlson PE, Bergin II, Aronoff DM, Young VB. 2011. Cefoperazone-treated mice as an experimental platform to assess differential virulence of Clostridium difficile strains. Gut Microbes 2:326–334. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Burke KE, Lamont JT. 2013. Fecal transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in older adults: a review. J Am Geriatrics Soc 61:1394–1398. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Visser CE, Kuijper EJ, Bartelsman JF, Tijssen JG, Speelman P, Dijkgraaf MG, Keller JJ. 2013. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 368:407–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






