Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1993 May 1;90(9):4295–4298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.4295

PutA protein, a membrane-associated flavin dehydrogenase, acts as a redox-dependent transcriptional regulator.

P Ostrovsky de Spicer 1, S Maloy 1
PMCID: PMC46493  PMID: 8483946

Abstract

The proline utilization (put) operon of Salmonella typhimurium is transcriptionally repressed by PutA protein in the absence of proline. PutA protein also carries out the enzymatic steps in proline catabolism. These two roles require different cellular localizations of PutA. Catabolism of proline requires PutA to associate with the membrane because reoxidation of the FAD cofactor in PutA needs the presence of an electron acceptor. Repression of the put operon requires PutA to bind to the put control-region DNA in the cytoplasm. The presence of proline, the inducer, is necessary but not sufficient for PutA to discriminate between its roles as an enzyme or as a repressor. Two conditions that prevent PutA protein binding to the put control region are (i) when proline and an electron acceptor or the cytoplasmic membrane are present or (ii) when PutA is reduced by dithionite. These two conditions increase the relative hydrophobicity of PutA protein, favoring membrane association and therefore enzymatic activity.

Full text

PDF
4295

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abrahamson J. L., Baker L. G., Stephenson J. T., Wood J. M. Proline dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli K12. Properties of the membrane-associated enzyme. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Jul 15;134(1):77–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz D., Hushon J. M., Whitfield H. J., Jr, Roth J., Ames B. N. Procedure for identifying nonsense mutations. J Bacteriol. 1968 Jul;96(1):215–220. doi: 10.1128/jb.96.1.215-220.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bordier C. Phase separation of integral membrane proteins in Triton X-114 solution. J Biol Chem. 1981 Feb 25;256(4):1604–1607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brewer A. C., Marsh P. J., Patient R. K. A simplified method for in vivo footprinting using DMS. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Sep 25;18(18):5574–5574. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.18.5574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown E. D., Wood J. M. Redesigned purification yields a fully functional PutA protein dimer from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1992 Jun 25;267(18):13086–13092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garner M. M., Revzin A. A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: application to components of the Escherichia coli lactose operon regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jul 10;9(13):3047–3060. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.13.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Giniger E., Varnum S. M., Ptashne M. Specific DNA binding of GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):767–774. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90336-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Graham S. B., Stephenson J. T., Wood J. M. Proline dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli K12. Reconstitution of a functional membrane association. J Biol Chem. 1984 Feb 25;259(4):2656–2661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hahn D. R., Myers R. S., Kent C. R., Maloy S. R. Regulation of proline utilization in Salmonella typhimurium: molecular characterization of the put operon, and DNA sequence of the put control region. Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Jul;213(1):125–133. doi: 10.1007/BF00333408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee E. C., Gumport R. I., Gardner J. F. Genetic analysis of bacteriophage lambda integrase interactions with arm-type attachment site sequences. J Bacteriol. 1990 Mar;172(3):1529–1538. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.3.1529-1538.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maloy S. R., Roth J. R. Regulation of proline utilization in Salmonella typhimurium: characterization of put::Mu d(Ap, lac) operon fusions. J Bacteriol. 1983 May;154(2):561–568. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.2.561-568.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maloy S., Stewart V. Autogenous regulation of gene expression. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jan;175(2):307–316. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.2.307-316.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Menzel R., Roth J. Enzymatic properties of the purified putA protein from Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem. 1981 Sep 25;256(18):9762–9766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Menzel R., Roth J. Purification of the putA gene product. A bifunctional membrane-bound protein from Salmonella typhimurium responsible for the two-step oxidation of proline to glutamate. J Biol Chem. 1981 Sep 25;256(18):9755–9761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Menzel R., Roth J. Regulation of the genes for proline utilization in Salmonella typhimurium: autogenous repression by the putA gene product. J Mol Biol. 1981 May 5;148(1):21–44. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90233-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ostrovsky de Spicer P., O'Brien K., Maloy S. Regulation of proline utilization in Salmonella typhimurium: a membrane-associated dehydrogenase binds DNA in vitro. J Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;173(1):211–219. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.1.211-219.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ratzkin B., Roth J. Cluster of genes controlling proline degradation in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1978 Feb;133(2):744–754. doi: 10.1128/jb.133.2.744-754.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Russell P., Hager L. P., Gennis R. B. Characterization of the proteolytic activation of pyruvate oxidase. Control by specific ligands and by the flavin oxidation-reduction state. J Biol Chem. 1977 Nov 10;252(21):7877–7882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES