Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2014 Dec 4;5(12):e1558. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.512

DNA methylation and differential gene regulation in photoreceptor cell death

P Farinelli 1,2, A Perera 3, B Arango-Gonzalez 2, D Trifunovic 2, M Wagner 4, T Carell 4, M Biel 3, E Zrenner 2, S Michalakis 3,*, F Paquet-Durand 2,*, P A R Ekström 1
PMCID: PMC4649831  PMID: 25476906

Abstract

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) defines a group of inherited degenerative retinal diseases causing progressive loss of photoreceptors. To this day, RP is still untreatable and rational treatment development will require a thorough understanding of the underlying cell death mechanisms. Methylation of the DNA base cytosine by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) is an important epigenetic factor regulating gene expression, cell differentiation, cell death, and survival. Previous studies suggested an involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in RP, and in this study, increased cytosine methylation was detected in dying photoreceptors in the rd1, rd2, P23H, and S334ter rodent models for RP. Ultrastructural analysis of photoreceptor nuclear morphology in the rd1 mouse model for RP revealed a severely altered chromatin structure during retinal degeneration that coincided with an increased expression of the DNMT isozyme DNMT3a. To identify disease-specific differentially methylated DNA regions (DMRs) on a genomic level, we immunoprecipitated methylated DNA fragments and subsequently analyzed them with a targeted microarray. Genome-wide comparison of DMRs between rd1 and wild-type retina revealed hypermethylation of genes involved in cell death and survival as well as cell morphology and nervous system development. When correlating DMRs with gene expression data, we found that hypermethylation occurred alongside transcriptional repression. Consistently, motif analysis showed that binding sites of several important transcription factors for retinal physiology were hypermethylated in the mutant model, which also correlated with transcriptional silencing of their respective target genes. Finally, inhibition of DNMTs in rd1 organotypic retinal explants using decitabine resulted in a substantial reduction of photoreceptor cell death, suggesting inhibition of DNA methylation as a potential novel treatment in RP.

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) refers to a heterogeneous group of inherited retinal degenerations that provoke progressive and irreversible loss of photoreceptors. In the developed countries, RP represents the leading cause for severe vision loss and blindness among young people.1 Currently, mutations in >50 genes have been linked to RP (https://sph.uth.tmc.edu/retnet/), but the mechanisms that lead to photoreceptor death are still unresolved, and there is no treatment available. RP therapy development is severely limited by the high genetic heterogeneity, which therefore calls for the identification of common disease mechanisms and drug targets.

A previous microarray study showed a dramatic modification in gene expression when the rd1 mouse model for RP was compared with wild-type (wt) animals.2 Such profound effects on gene expression are probably a consequence of both pro-survival responses and induction of cell death pathways. Alterations of gene expression are often linked to epigenetic events, such as acetylation and poly-ADP-ribosylation of histones. In this regard, we have previously found the activity of both histone deacetylase (HDAC) and poly-ADP-ribose-polymerase (PARP) to be causally involved in retinal degeneration.3, 4 Although these epigenetic regulators function via modification of the chromatin structure, direct methylation of the DNA5, 6 is another powerful factor in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. DNA methylation was recently connected with retinal degeneration and retinal development.7 However, it is still unknown if and how DNA methylation patterns vary between different genes in healthy and diseased tissues and whether an interference with DNA methylation would be beneficial for degenerating photoreceptors.

The covalent addition of a methyl group on cytidines followed by guanosine in the DNA is performed by various DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) such as DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B,8, 9 while DNMT3L may stimulate de novo DNA methylation.10 Methylation occurs mainly in gene promoters but can also be seen in intergenic non-coding regions and within genes.11 DNA methylation is generally associated with repression of transcription.12

Here, we have compared retinal DNA methylation in the rd1 mouse model,13 with those of healthy, congenic wt mice and correlated DNA methylation changes with gene expression data sets. We then used an organotypic retinal explant system to evaluate the effect of a DNA methylation inhibitor on rd1 photoreceptor survival in vitro. We furthermore analyzed the extent of DNA methylation in three other RP models, namely the rd2 mouse and the S334ter and P23H transgenic rats. All four RP models represent mutations that are similar to the ones found in certain cohorts of patients.14, 15, 16

Our data show an increase in DNA methylation in dying photoreceptors in all four RP animal models analyzed, suggesting DNA hypermethylation as a common denominator in the photoreceptor degeneration pathway. Moreover, our results reveal that in rd1 retinae specific genes may be either hypomethylated or hypermethylated. Pharmacological inhibition of DNMTs significantly reduced rd1 photoreceptor cell death in short-term experiments but did not increase cell survival in the long-term experiments. Our findings thus suggest a complex relation between DNA methylation and retinal degeneration, which may include both disease-driving and disease-counteracting elements.

Results

rd1 photoreceptors show abnormal chromatin structure

Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, manifest themselves in chromatin rearrangements. For an initial assessment, we performed an analysis of photoreceptor nuclei ultrastructure in PN11 rd1 and wt retinae. Nuclei of both rd1 and wt photoreceptors (Figure 1a) contain both dense heterochromatin (dark in the EM micrographs) with low transcriptional activity and loose euchromatin (light in the micrographs) with high transcriptional activity. This is normal for mouse photoreceptor nuclei at this age, although adult rod nuclei in contrast to other cells display an inversed nuclear architecture, that is, their euchromatin is collected closest to the nuclear envelope and the heterochromatin placed in the center of the nuclei.17

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Altered rd1 nuclear ultrastructure and DNA methylation. (a) The overview of PN11 wt and rd1 ONL illustrates the mixed distribution of heterochromatin and euchromatin (dark and light areas, respectively) in both wt and (most) rd1 photoreceptor nuclei. Typical examples of such nuclei are pointed out by red arrows. By contrast, rd1 photoreceptor nuclear configurations varied considerably from ‘normal' (=similar to wt nuclei), via the different stages 1 and 2, to very condensed, electron dense and dark, that is, stage 3 (blue arrow in rd1 picture). These stages are shown in more detail in panel (b). (c and d) In rd1 PN11 retina, immunostaining for 5mC (green), together with a nuclear counterstain (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), blue), showed varying degrees of co-localization. 5mC-positive structures had a DAPI appearance that was either heterogeneous rounded (*), or homogenous rounded (arrows), or weak to the point of being absent (arrowheads), most likely reflecting the different stages of nuclear condensation identified in panel (a). The confocal images in c and d are maximum projections of 16 and 21 Z-sections, respectively. Scale bars: a, c, and d=10 μm, b=2 μm

A subset of rd1 photoreceptor nuclei had a different appearance, and their chromatin and nuclear characteristics could be roughly categorized into four general stages (Figure 1b). Initially, rd1 photoreceptor nuclei appear normal, comparable to wt, with a clear density difference between heterochromatin and euchromatin, and with ‘fuzzy' borders of the heterochromatin. rd1 nuclei, which had an elongated form and normal size but displayed a darker euchromatin and sharper heterochromatin borders, were categorized as Stage 1. rd1 nuclei, with a smaller and rounded appearance, and with proportionally much more heterochromatin, with sharp borders were labeled as Stage 2. Some stage 2 nuclei also showed a euchromatin-containing area at their rim (Figure 1b). Stage 3 nuclei were in principle homogenously dark with only heterochromatin and were either round or irregular in shape and much smaller than normal nuclei. Stage 3 may represent the final phase of photoreceptor death, as they resemble the small terminal-dUTP-nick-end-labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells frequently observed in rd1 specimens of this age (see, e.g., Figure 4 in Sancho-Pelluz et al.4). Taken together, the nuclear structure of the degenerating rd1 photoreceptors is severely altered.

DNA methylation is increased in dying photoreceptors

To study photoreceptor DNA methylation in situ, we used immunofluorescence with an anti-5-methylcytosine (5mC) antibody. 5mC-positive rd1 nuclei were most often round and also frequently smaller than their negative counterparts (Figures 1c and d). Combined with the EM data, this could indicate that DNA hypermethylation occurs primarily at later stages of rd1 photoreceptor death (i.e., Stages 2 and 3 in Figure 1b). The 5mC signal was commonly localized to the nuclear rim (arrows in Figures 1c and d) or had a very condensed appearance (arrowheads in Figures 1c and d). Remarkably, 5mC appeared to avoid the most DAPI-dense parts of the nuclei, including supposed chromocenters (asterisk in Figure 1c). As DAPI is a dye that binds to the minor groove of the DNA,18 5mC-positive DNA may have lost its conventional confirmation and minor groove resulting in a DAPI-negative staining.

In rd1 retina, alterations of nuclear morphology correlate with increased HDAC activity,4 and we therefore assessed protein acetylation together with DNA hypermethylation. Interestingly, three different rodent RP models (rd1 mouse, S334ter, and P23H rats) displayed 5mC labeling in cells with lysine hypoacetylation (Figure 2), that is, with overactivated HDACs,4, 16 indicating that more than one epigenetic event may simultaneously affect degenerating photoreceptors.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

DNA methylation colocalizes with protein deacetylation. Loss of lysine acetylation can mark HDAC activation (Sancho-Pelluz et al.4). Stainings for 5mC and lysine acetylation (Ac. lysines) were here combined, which resulted in that 5mC staining often occurred in nuclei where acetylated lysines were very low or absent, suggesting an interplay between HDAC and DNMT activities. This was seen in (a) rd1 mouse, as well as in (b) S334ter and (c) P23H rat retinae. ONL: the individual figures are oriented such that this layer is up and inner retinal layers are down. Scale bar=20 μm. The results are representative for observations made in at least three different individuals of each genotype

Strong immunoreactivity for methylated DNA was only rarely found in any retinal cell layer of wt animals or in the inner retinal layers in rd1 animals. By contrast, a distinct subset of cells in the rd1 outer nuclear layer (ONL) had clearly labeled nuclei (Figure 3a), that were observed also in other models for RP, including the rd2 mouse. In all of these models, and in line with the rd1 data, a sub-population of photoreceptors showed an increase of nuclear DNA methylation at the evaluated time points compared with wt counterparts (Figures 3b–d). This suggested increased DNA methylation as a general phenomenon during inherited photoreceptor degeneration.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

DNA methylation colocalizes with cell death in four different RP animal models. An immunostaining for 5mC was performed together with the TUNEL assay for dying cells in four animal models for RP. In these models, co-staining was performed at time points corresponding to the onset or peak of retinal degeneration. In (a) PN11 rd1 and (b) PN19 rd2 mouse retina, as well as in (c) PN12 S334ter and (d) PN19 P23H rat retina, the numbers of 5mC immunodecorated photoreceptors was increased when compared with wt controls and most of the 5mC-positive cells were co-labeled with the TUNEL assay. GCL=ganglion cell layer; INL=inner nuclear layer. Scale bar=20 μm. The results are representative for observations made in at least three different individuals of each genotype

In all the analyzed models, the TUNEL assay for dying cells co-labeled the 5mC-positive cells to a great extent, suggesting an intimate connection between increased DNA methylation and the degeneration of the photoreceptors (Figures 3a–d). Moreover, the various models have different degeneration kinetics, which leads to different numbers of dying photoreceptor cells at their respective peak of degeneration.16, 19, 20 Yet, the amount of 5mC-positive ONL cells reflected the amount of TUNEL-positive cells faithfully (Figures 3a–d), again indicating that the DNA hypermethylation was somehow related to the degeneration.

To better understand the temporal dynamics of the photoreceptor DNA methylation, we analyzed 5mC immunoreactivity in rd1 retinal sections from PN7 to PN15 and compared it with the progression of cell death as evidenced by TUNEL staining (Figure 4a). Although very low at PN7, the number of 5mC-positive cells strongly increased until PN13 (degeneration peak) to then decrease at PN15. The temporal dynamics of DNA methylation versus rd1 TUNEL staining thus pointed to DNA methylation being a late event in photoreceptor cell death.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Temporal dynamics of DNA methylation and DNMT gene expression. (a) In rd1 ONL, at early PN ages, the numbers of photoreceptors showing 5mC staining were very low, increased from PN11 onwards, and peaked at PN13. The temporal progression of 5mC positivity in rd1 ONL corresponded largely to the extent of cell death as evidenced by TUNEL staining, implying a close connection between DNA methylation and cell death. (b) Quantitative reverse transcriptase–PCR analysis of different DNMT mRNAs showed a statistically significant upregulation of DNMT3A and DNMT3L expression in rd1 retina. Data points in panel (a) represent the percentage of relative positive cells (peak value=100%)±S.D., with n=3–4. Bars in panel (b) represent mean±S.D., n=3, with arbitrary units (arb. un.) for mRNA expression (wt=1). Values were compared using the Student's t-test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01

DNA methylation coincides with increased DNMT expression

To test whether the observed hypermethylation was caused by increased expression of DNMTs, we applied quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of different DNMTs in PN11 rd1 and wt retinae. DNMT3A (3.5±0.9 arbitrary units (a.u.)) and DNMT3L (4.1±0.6) were found to be upregulated in the rd1 mutants when compared with age-matched wt (1.0±0.2 and 1.1±0.6 a.u., respectively, P<0.05). No alterations in the gene expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3B were detected (Figure 4b).

To study DNA methylation also at the tissue level, we employed high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with mass spectrometry on global retinal samples to yield the percentage of methylated cytidines within the samples. The results suggest that from a quantitative point the DNA methylation is unchanged at the global tissue level (wt=3.27%±0.08; rd1=3.25%±0.04; n=5 for both genotypes). The results from this tissue-based approach thus are in contrast to the results obtained with the cellular approach above, which could indicate that the relatively low number of cells showing strong DNA methylation may not be picked up at the whole tissue level.

DNA methylation affects different genomic regions in rd1 and wt

In a qualitative approach, we assessed the genomic localization of 5mC in wt and rd1 retinae by performing a DNA methylation microarray (2.1M Deluxe Promoters, NimbleGen). We used the cistrome platform (http://cistrome.org/ap/) to identify peak enrichment (MA2C tool) and performed further analysis. First, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficients to correlate rd1 and wt signal profiles that were restricted to methylated genomic regions. We detected 77% overlap of methylated regions in rd1 and wt, suggesting that there are differentially methylated regions in rd1 mice in comparison to wt (Figure 5a).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Genomic distribution of 5mC in rd1 and wt mice at PN11. (a) Correlation plot of methylation distribution between wt and rd1 retinae at PN11. Venn diagram of differentially methylated genes in wt (violet) and rd1 (red), showing 1284 genes to be hypermethylated in rd1, whereas only 95 genes are hypomethylated. (b) Additionally, 1727 genes have conserved methylation patterns. (c) Gene ontology analysis of genes methylated in rd1 retina. (d) Heatmap representations of 5mC enrichment in identified peak regions (5 kb flanking the transcription start site (TSS), which is the 5′ position of a gene sequence, where transcription starts). (e) Exemplified composite profiles for different clusters. Composite signal profiles of 5mC patterns in genes characterized by 5mC enrichment or lack of 5mC enrichment in concatenated exons in (f) the wt and (g) the rd1 retina. The methylation profiles for wt and rd1 reveal stronger methylation of exons in rd1, independent of the relative distance within the exon (f and g). (h) Overlayed average gene methylation profiles in wt and rd1 retina. Note the 5mC enrichment at gene promoter regions (500 bp upstream, i.e., left of TSS) for both genotypes, and in gene body towards 3′ end of the gene in rd1 (approximately 2000–3500 downstream, i.e., right of TSS) (h). Grey areas in (f–h) indicate regions without 5mC enrichment

Mapping the peak location to genes using the peak2gene tool of the cistrome platform, we detected 1727 genes equally methylated in both groups but 95 genes that were hypomethylated in the rd1. However, this alteration was outbalanced by the detection of 1284 hypermethylated genes in rd1, which indicated increased DNA methylation in intragenic regions (Figure 5b,Supplementary Table S1). Gene ontology analysis revealed strong methylation enrichment of genes related to nervous system development and function, cellular assembly, organization, function, and maintenance as well as cell death, survival, and morphology (Figure 5c).

Moreover, k-means clustering revealed that methylation enrichment appeared to be stronger in specific genomic regions in the rd1 retina (Supplementary Table S1). Example data on the distribution of average signal plots of 5mC reads on different genomic regions are visualized in Figures 5d and e. To further investigate the differential distribution on hypermethylated sites, we investigated the average exon profile in wt and rd1 mice (Figures 5f and g). Remarkably, we detected stronger exonic methylation in rd1 irrespective of its relative location within the exon. The meta-gene plot in rd1 and wt (Figure 5h) revealed prominent promoter methylation in both rd1 and wt. However, we also detected increased gene body methylation toward the 3′ end in rd1 retina.

Motif enrichment of hypermethylated rd1 sites and gene expression correlation

Transcription factor binding to the DNA may be sensitive to the methylation status of its respective binding site.21, 22 Therefore, we used the cistrome platform (Sitepro tool) to further investigate whether 5mC was enriched in specific transcription factor-binding sites. Hypermethylation in rd1 mice was enriched in specific binding motifs of transcription factors, including Yin Yang 1 (YY1), E2F transcription factor 3 (E2F3), and neural retina-specific leucine zipper protein (NRL) (Figures 6a–g, Supplementary Table S2). For the possible connection with RP, it is interesting to note that YY1 can interact with HDACs, is itself regulated by acetylation,23 and may be photoreceptor specific in the retina.24 E2F3, on the other hand, might contribute to rod photoreceptor cell death in the rd1 model.25 Furthermore, NRL mutations are associated with autosomal-dominant RP.26 We thus analyzed the methylation status of potential YY1, E2F3, and NRL target genes (Supplementary Table S3). For YY1, we detected 351 target genes, of which 19 were methylated in wt only and 140 had a conserved methylation pattern in the transcription factor-binding sites between the two genotypes. However, the majority (192 of 351) of YY1 target genes were methylated in rd1 only (Figure 6c). We detected a similar pattern for NRL target genes (8, 128, and 146 out of 282; wt, conserved, and rd1, respectively; Figure 6e) and E2F3 (8, 103, and 130 out of 242; wt, conserved, and rd1, respectively; Figure 6g) target genes.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Motif enrichment of methylation patterns and gene expression correlation. (a) The list shows the top 20 of motifs enriched in rd1 retina at PN11. Globally enriched motifs in methylated regions in rd1 retina at PN11 for (b) YY1, (d) NRL, and (f) E2F3. Venn diagrams of methylated genes containing binding motifs for (c) YY1, (e) NRL, and (g) E2F3 in wt and rd1. (h) Gene expression profile of methylation unaltered (conserved) genes and hypermethylated genes in rd1. Bars represent mean±S.E.M., n=3, of log2 (gene) expression ratios. Pairs of groups were compared using the Student's t-test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.005

We then studied the relationship between 5mC and gene expression during retinal degeneration, for which we went back to the original gene expression raw data from a previous microarray experiment2 and correlated this with the hypermethylated genes seen here. Global correlation analysis revealed that genes carrying methylated regions in the promoter or gene body were expressed at significantly lower levels compared with unmethylated genes (Student's t-test, P<0.005; Figure 6h). The same was true for the subgroups of YY1, E2F3, and NRL target genes (Student's t-test, P<0.05, P<0.01, and P<0.05, respectively; Figure 6h). Together, this suggested that hypermethylation of genes and their regulatory regions correlated with transcriptional repression in the rd1 retina.

DNMT inhibition delays rd1 photoreceptor degeneration in vitro

Our study based on immunofluorescence provided strong evidence for a disease-induced increase of DNA methylation in rd1 photoreceptors. DNMTs can be pharmacologically inhibited with cytidine-nucleotide analogues.27, 28 Among those, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) has been reported to reduce DNA methylation and restore gene expression patterns in human neuronal cell lines29 and showed promising results towards the treatment of proliferative diseases.30, 31 We therefore investigated whether decitabine had any effects on photoreceptor cell survival using rd1 organotypic retinal explant cultures.

Retinae from rd1 animals received treatment with 0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 μM decitabine for 4 days (short-term cultures, ending at postnatal (PN) day 11, Figures 7a and b; see Material and Methods section for further details on culturing paradigms). Although all concentrations tested reduced the number of TUNEL-positive cells, treatment with 2.5 μM decitabine was most powerful and reduced the number of dying cells by 48% (control=4.8%±0.7; 2.5 μM decitabine treated=2.5%±0.5; P<0.05). Quantification of the numbers of 5mC-positive cells revealed a reduction of around 41% in the treatment group compared with untreated controls (Figures 7c and d; control=3.0%±0.6; 2.5 μM decitabine treated=1.8%±0.6; P<0.05), indicating that decitabine treatment indeed reduced DNA methylation.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Short-term DNMT inhibition protects rd1 photoreceptor in vitro. (a and b) Treatment with the DNMT inhibitor decitabine for 4 days in vitro significantly reduced photoreceptor cell death (expressed as the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells in the ONL). (c and d) At 2.5 μM, decitabine also reduced the numbers of 5mC-positive cells. Bars represent mean±S.D., n=2–7, and values were compared using the Student's t-test. **P<0.01, ***P<0.005; ONL: the individual figures are oriented such that this layer is up and inner retinal layers are down. Scale bar=20 μm. See Material and Methods section for culturing paradigm details

We next analyzed whether DNMT inhibition promoted photoreceptor cell survival in long-term organotypic cultures treated with 2.5 μM decitabine. After 12 days of treatment (ending at PN19), both groups exhibited the same number of surviving photoreceptor rows (control=3.4±0.6 rows; treated=3.4±0.3; n=6; P>0.05).

Discussion

Our work highlights the importance of DNA methylation for neuronal cell death in the retina. Increased DNA methylation was detected in four different models for retinal degeneration representing mutations of varying kinds and with most likely various entry points into the degeneration processes. Together with earlier studies,7 our data points to DNA hypermethylation as a common denominator in inherited photoreceptor degeneration.

DNA methylation and gene regulation

We found that DNA methylation was most prominent and reached ‘catastrophic' intensities during the final stages of cell death. However, we cannot exclude that hypermethylation of specific genes may be starting far earlier. For instance, we observed alterations in DNA methylation at the level of individual genes, including hypermethylation of the important transcription factors YY1, E2F3, and NRL. As we also noted a transcriptional repression of their target genes, this process should have required some time and hence the hypermethylation of the transcription factors is likely to have happened before the cell entered the final phase of cell death. Bearing in mind the nature of YY1, E2F3, and NRL target genes, this could have far-reaching effects, leading to critical dysregulation of cellular events to precipitate photoreceptor cell death.

Moreover, hypermethylation may occur in synergy with other epigenetic events, as it coincided with low acetylation, suggesting a simultaneously increased HDAC activity. This goes well with the many interconnections between DNA methylation and HDAC events,10, 32, 33 which may reinforce each other in preventing transcription.34 We therefore propose that degenerating photoreceptors trigger an epigenetic program that includes de novo DNA methylation to shut down transcription and protein biosynthesis to minimize energy expenditure during cell death.

Interestingly, we also noted several hypomethylated genes suggesting that demethylation of methylcytosine may also have a role during photoreceptor cell death. However, it remains elusive if demethylation is triggered by active DNA demethylation via hydroxylase activity of ten eleven translocation (Tet) enzymes, DNA repair, or oxidative damage during photoreceptor degeneration.

DNA methylation as a novel target for retinal neuroprotection

The use of (non-decitabine) DNMT inhibitors to reduce DNA methylation has previously been proposed to be neuroprotective in motor neurons in vivo as well as in a neuronal cell line in vitro.35 Yet, Wang et al.36 reported neurotoxicity by decitabine in cultured dopaminergic cells. We evaluated the role of DNMTs in the degeneration process by treating organotypic rd1 retinal explant cultures with decitabine. Although decitabine did not increase the number of surviving photoreceptors in long-term cultures, in short-term experiments it reduced DNA hypermethylation and decreased the number of dying photoreceptors. This effect of decitabine is intriguing, considering its mode of action: A cytidine analogue of decitabine is thought to be incorporated into newly synthesized DNA.37 This reduces the possibilities for de novo methylation by DNMTs in any new DNA, such as in daughter cells of proliferating cells. In addition, decitabine can promote the degradation of DNMT enzymes,37 to result in an overall reduction of DNA methylation.

At any rate, the protective effects of decitabine in short-term treatment confirm the causal involvement of DNA methylation in rd1 photoreceptor cell death. As this delay in rd1 degeneration does not manifest itself in the long term, massive DNA methylation likely occurs during the final stages of cell death.

DNA methylation during photoreceptor cell death

Although the mechanisms of photoreceptor cell death remain elusive, in recent years the focus has shifted from apoptotic processes38 to non-apoptotic pathways.39 In particular, a number of epigenetic events have been causally associated. This includes the excessive activation of PARP1 and PARG and accumulation of PARylated proteins3, 40, 41 as well as over-activation of HDAC and hypoacetylation of proteins, in particular histones.4 Remarkably, deacetylation and excessive PARylation appeared to be occurring in sequence in the same cell, that is, deacetylation of proteins was followed by PARylation.4 Our current findings add DNA hypermethylation to this picture, which also appears prominently in cells that show very low protein acetylation. This corresponds to the known connections between DNA methylation and epigenetic protein modifications.10, 32, 42 DNA methylation and HDAC activities could, for instance, cooperate to prevent the mentioned transcription factors from acting.

The exact type of DNMT responsible for rd1 photoreceptor DNA hypermethylation will have to be determined in future studies. DNMT1 was found to be related to survival rather than cell death, as lack of DNMT1 caused a relatively rapid photoreceptor degeneration.43 However, the observed upregulation of DNMT3A mRNA in the rd1 retina suggests that this DNMT is a candidate for mediating increased methylation. This is in line with the de novo methyltransferase activity of DNMT3A, which could additionally complement and correct DNMT1 enzymatic activity,12 modifying cytosines in newly synthesized non-methylated DNA. Additionally, overexpression of DNMT3A, but not DNMT1, triggered cell death in a neuronal cell line.35

As mentioned above, decitabine is thought to be incorporated into newly synthesized DNA.37 However, the retinal photoreceptors are regarded as postmitotic neurons and are, as such, not expected to synthesize large amounts of DNA outside their development. Nevertheless, incorporation of thymidine analogs has been demonstrated in rd1 photoreceptors, and this could reflect either ongoing DNA repair in diseased cells44 or a failed attempt to re-enter the cell cycle.25 In either case, the effect of decitabine treatment suggests that there has been an increase in DNA methylation during the rd1 degeneration, which somehow contributes to cell death. However, it has been suggested that the execution of apoptosis is not compatible with concomitant DNA synthesis.45 Taken together, our findings thus point to the presence of non-apoptotic mechanisms during photoreceptor death,39 in which epigenetic processes have a preeminent role.

Conclusion

In summary, we have demonstrated increased DNA methylation in photoreceptor degeneration in four different models of RP in two different species. The methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and microarray data-based analyses revealed transcriptional silencing via cytosine methylation as a new player in the degeneration mechanism and provided us with fresh entry points for further investigations. Our analysis highlighted the importance of differential methylation patterns in individual rd1 and wt genes. Finally, DNMT inhibition delayed retinal degeneration suggesting DNA methylation as a common denominator during photoreceptor cell death and emphasizing the potential of DNMT inhibitors for mutation-independent neuroprotection in RP.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Animals were kept under standard white cyclic lighting, with ad libitum access to food and water, and were used irrespective of gender. Four different mouse and rat mutant lines were used, together with the corresponding wild-type lines (see Table 1). P23H and S334ter rhodopsin transgenic rats were kindly provided by Dr. M M LaVail (University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA). All procedures were performed in accordance with either the Swedish (rd1 and rd2, wt mice; permit nos. M242/07 and M220/09) and German (S334ter, P23H and CD rats, Anzeige/Mitteilung nach § 4 vom 28.04.08 and 29.04.10) animal care and ethics committees. Efforts were made to keep the number of animals used and their suffering to a minimum, and the experiments followed the ARVO statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and visual research.

Table 1. Animal strains and species used in this study; affected genes, effects, and original references.

Strain and species Mutated gene Effect Ages used Reference
C3H wild-type mouse — — PN11/PN19 56
C3H rd1 mouse Pde6b cGMP accumulation, rapid rod photoreceptor degeneration, onset ≤PN10, concluded ≥PN21 PN11a 13, 20
C3H rd2 mouse Prph2 No outer segment formation, slow rod and cone degeneration, onset ≤PN16, concluded ≥PN180 PN19 57
CD(S.D.) wild-type rat — — PN12/PN15 —
CD(S.D.) P23H rat Rho (P23H tg) Rhodopsin misfolding, rod degeneration, onset ≤PN15, concluded ≥PN90 PN15 58
CD(S.D.) S334ter rat Rho (S334ter tg) Rhodopsin truncation, very rapid rod degeneration, onset ≤PN10, concluded ≥PN18 PN12 59
Open in a new tab
a

For rd1 mice, we also used PN7, PN9, PN11, PN13, and PN15 for temporal analysis of 5mC detection

For biochemical analyses and comparisons between mutant and wild-type tissues, we used material from ages corresponding to phases where the degeneration is under way (see Table 1), but where the loss of retinal tissue is still minimal, reducing the risk for technical bias.46, 47 For rd1, this was PN 11; for rd2 mice PN19; for Rho P23H rats PN15; and for Rho S334ter rats PN12. For the temporal analysis of 5mC detection, we used rd1 mouse retinae from PN7, PN9, PN11, PN13, and PN15.

Organotypic retinal explant culture

Tissue was obtained from PN5 rd1 animals that were killed by decapitation, after which the eyes were enucleated and retinae cultured as previously described.4, 48 In brief, the retina and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were isolated and subsequently transferred to a Millicell culture dish filter insert (Millipore AB, Solna, Sweden; PIHA03050), with the RPE layer facing the culturing membrane and incubated in R16 nutrient medium at 37 °C. The full volume of nutrient medium, 1.5 ml per dish, was replaced with fresh medium every second day (with the exception of the one-day treatment experiments below) during the culturing period.

PN5 explants were allowed to adjust to culture conditions for 2 days in vitro. Cultures were then treated with 5-aza-2'deoxycitydine (decitabine, no. A-3656, Sigma, Stockholm, Sweden) every second day for 4 days reaching the equivalent to PN11 (short term: PN5+2 days in vitro+4 days in vitro with treatment) or to PN19 (long term: PN5+2 days in vitro +12 days in vitro with treatment). The cultures assigned for treatment were given 0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 μM of decitabine. Quantification of cells positive for the cell death marker TUNEL (see below) and counting of surviving photoreceptor rows represented the readout for short- and long-term cultures. All treatment experiments were done in a paired fashion, with treated and untreated samples from one animal processed together. Thus, treated/untreated samples were stained under the exact same conditions.

Fixation, sectioning, and microscopy

Enucleated mouse and rat eyes and cultured retinae were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS at 4 °C for 2 and 1 h for mouse and rat, respectively. Eyes were cryoprotected in Sorensen's sucrose buffer and processed to 12-μm cryosections.

Routine morphological observations were performed on a Zeiss Axiophot (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axiocam (Zeiss) digital camera. Fluorescence excitation was provided by a HBO 100W halogen lamp. Images were taken by means of the Zeiss Axiovision 4.2 software; images elaboration and overlays were performed utilizing Adobe Photoshop CS (San Jose, CA, USA).

Terminal dUTP nick-end labeling

TUNEL staining on fixed preparations was performed using an in situ kit (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit; TMR Red, Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Controls with this kit and similar preparations were performed by omitting the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase enzyme from the labeling solution (negative control) and by pretreating the sections for 30 min with DNAse I (Roche, 3 U/ml) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mg/ml BSA to induce DNA strand breaks (positive control).3

Histological staining and immunofluorescence

Fixed sections were stained for general histological light microscopic analysis with hematoxylin–eosin (HE) according to the standard protocols or underwent immunostaining. For the latter, the sections were washed 3 × 5 min each in PBS containing 0.25% Triton X100 (PTX) plus 1% BSA. Blocking solution consisting of PTX with 5% normal serum from the host animal, from which the secondary antibody was obtained, was applied for 45 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in PBS with 1% BSA and 0.25% Triton X100 and applied overnight at 4 °C. Sections were then washed 3 × 5 min each in PTX and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies diluted in PTX for 45 min. After three more washing steps in PBS, the sections were mounted with Vectashield DAPI (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). Controls consisted of sections processed in parallel without primary antibody and application of the fluorescence detection system.

5mC results were obtained with the sheep anti-5mC antibody (Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK; category no. NB-100-744, working dilution 1 : 200) and confirmed with two other anti-5mC antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, Ab10805; 1 : 1000 and Ab51552; 1 : 50, data not shown). To exclude the possibility of unspecific antibody binding to DNA in degenerating nuclei, we also performed pretreatment of rd1 and wt sections with 3 N HCl, which denatures the DNA. This yielded a weak and general nuclear staining of most retinal cells, but there was still a clear difference between the rd1 and wt retinae, in that a subset of rd1 photoreceptor nuclei attained a strong immunostaining that was not present in the wt situation (Supplementary Figure S1). In the 5mC staining in sections without pretreatment (see Figures 3a–d and also Figures 1c and d), there is, in principle, no positive nuclei outside of the brightly stained ones of the rd1 ONL.

Confocal microscopy

Samples were analyzed with a Zeiss 510 Meta confocal laser scanning microscope (Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Germany). The 488-nm line of a 30 mW Ar ion laser was used for AF488 excitation, and a 405-nm 15-mW solid-state laser for DAPI excitation. DAPI fluorescence was detected using a 420–480-nm bandpass filter, and AF488 with a 505–550-nm bandpass filter. A 63 × /1.5 Plan Apochromat oil immersion objective was used. The pinhole diameter was 1.0 Airy unit (giving optical sections of about 0.6 μm when using the 63 × /1.5 objective). Optical sections for z-stacks were sampled with 50% overlap, that is, with a step size of 0.30 μm. For presentation in Figures 1c and d, we used maximum intensity projections, based on 16 and 21 Z-sections, respectively.

Counting of cells

The number of TUNEL- or 5mC-positive (+) cells was assessed and calculated as reported previously.49, 50 For each animal, at least three sections were quantified to yield an average value, and at least three different animals were analyzed for each experimental situation. Values are given as TUNEL (+) cells relative to control±S.D. Statistical significance was tested using either paired or unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test or ANOVA test as indicated. For all tests, a P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Electron microscopy

Analysis of degenerating and normal retinae was also performed at the electron microscopy (EM) level using the standard methods for transmission EM. In brief, whole eyes of mouse were enucleated and quickly punctured to improve fixative penetration. The eyes were then fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer overnight. The specimens were then postfixed in 1% osmium tetraoxide for 1 h, after which they were dehydrated in an ethanol series followed by acetone and embedded in Epon resin. Ultrathin sections about 50-nm thick were cut on a Leica UCT ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), placed on single-slot grids, and stained with 2% uranylacetate for 30 min and lead citrate for 3 min. The sections were viewed in a JEOL 1230 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), and digital pictures with a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels were taken using a GATAN Multiscan camera (GATAN, Abingdon Oxon, UK).

Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation

MeDIP was performed according to the protocol provided from Roche-NimbleGen (Madison, WI, USA). In detail, DNA was extracted from PN11 wt and rd1 retinae with DNeasy kit (No. 69504, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The analysis encompassed two samples of each genotype, with each sample being produced by using two retinae. DNA was incubated overnight at 37 °C with MseI restriction enzyme (No. R0525S, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), which cuts unmethylated sequences only. The buffer provided by the company was supplemented with 100 ng/μl BSA, and the reaction ran overnight at 37 °C. Digested DNA samples were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (No. 28104, Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A volume of 1.25 μl of purified DNA was then diluted in 300 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 7,5; 1 mM EDTA) and heat denatured at 95 °C for 10 min. Of this, 60 μl (250 ng) were removed and stored as input control, while to the remaining DNA, 60 μl of 5 × IP buffer (100 mM Na-phosphate, pH 7,0; 5 M NaCl; 10% Triton X-100; ddH2O until final volume) were added. Samples were immunoprecipitated using a mouse anti 5-methylcytidine antibody (Ab10805, Abcam) with a 1 : 1 ratio of antibody:DNA. The DNA:antibody mixture was incubated overnight at 4 °C on a slowly rotating platform to avoid foaming. Antibody conjugation to beads of protein A-agarose (No. 15918-014, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was performed for 2 h at 4 °C by gentle rolling. After washing the beads in 1 × IP buffer, they were centrifuged at 6000 r.p.m. (=3800 × g) for 2 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was discarded. Washing was repeated twice, and the beads were finally resuspended in 250-μl digestion buffer (1 M Tris HCl, pH 8,0; 0,5 M EDTA; 10% SDS; ddH2O until final volume). To resuspend the beads, 7 μl (10 mg/ml) of proteinase K (No. 03115836011, Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) was added. Microcentrifuge tubes containing the antibody–beads complex and DNA were then sealed with Parafilm and placed in 50-ml Falcon tubes filled with damp paper towel to avoid evaporation and incubated overnight on a rotating platform at 55 °C. To purify the samples, 250 μl of phenol (No. P-4557, Sigma Aldrich) was added. Methylated DNA samples were vortexed for 30 s and centrifuged at 14 000 r.p.m. (=20800 × g) for 5 min at room temperature. The aqueous supernatant was saved and transferred to sterile microcentrifuge tubes. The former step was then repeated but with the addition of 250 μl of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (No. C-0549, Sigma Aldrich). To pellet DNA-purified samples, 1 μl of glycogen (No. 10901393001, Roche Applied Science), 20 μl of 5 M NaCl, and 500 μl of ethanol were added, and precipitation of the samples occurred after incubation for 30 min at −80 °C. The pellets were centrifuged at 14 000 r.p.m. (=20800 × g) for 15 min at 4 °C; the supernatants were carefully removed, and samples were washed in 500 μl of cold 70% ethanol. Centrifugation was repeated, and samples were dried in a centrifugal evaporator and resuspended in 30 μl of 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8,5). We amplified 10 ng of immunoprecipitated and input DNA using the GenomePlex Complete Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) kit (No. WGA2-50RXN, Sigma Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Finally, each sample was further purified with the Qiagen QIAquick PCR purification Kit (see step 2) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Samples were then ready for analysis by microarray (2.1M Deluxe Promoters, NimbleGen) covering >90% of the known gene promoters in the mouse DNA.

Bioinformatics

Genome-wide binding data was analyzed with utilities in the cistrome portal.51 In brief, peak enrichment was analyzed by Model-based analysis of two-color arrays (MA2C) for ChIP-chip (Nimblegen) using the following parameters: bandwidth 300, max gap 250, min probes 5, threshold method P-value, value, 10−6, normalization method robust, C value 2, and mm9 assembly. Multiple wiggle file correlation was performed using methylated peak locations of wt and rd1. The Cistrome/Galaxy ‘integrative analysis – peak2gene' tool was used to retrieve all annotated genes located within 30 kb of the methylated sites and 1 kB of transcription factor-binding sites. Heatmap was generated using k-means cluster method and applying a k-means number of 5. The SitePro: Aggregation plot tool for signal profiling (version 1.0.0) was utilized to draw the average score profile around given genomic sites. Genomic location annotation and enrichment profiling was performed using CEAS (version 1.0.0.) by calculating average signal reads to generate average profile plots using the following parameters: Span 3000, Profiling resolution 50, Promoter/downstream lower-interval 1000, Promoter/downstream middle-interval 2000, Promoter/downstream upper-interval 3000, Bi-Promoter lower range 2500, Bi-Promoter upper range 5000, and Relative distance 3000. Motif analysis was performed by using the SeqPos Tool (version 1.0.0.) using a P-value cutoff of 0.001 and a scanning width of 600. Gene ontology analysis and pathway analysis was conducted using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. A previous microarray analysis compared the gene expression profiles of retinae from PN11 rd1 and wt animals.2 Here, we used its BASE data to study the correlation of methylation with gene expression.

RNA-extraction/RT-qPCR

Total RNA extraction was performed using the RNeasy-Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA quality was analyzed on an Agilent Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). RT-PCR was performed using the ThermoScript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany). qPCR was performed on a LightCycler 480 System (Roche Applied Science) using KAPA SYBR FAST (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany). Three different biological samples were analyzed in duplicates and normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene aminolevulinic acid synthase (ALAS). Relative quantification was determined by the method described by Pfaffl.52 The following primers were used (5′→3′ orientation): DNMT1 fwd.: CATATCTGCAAGGACATGAG, DNMT1 rev.: CACATCATGAAAGGTCTACTG, DNMT3A fwd.: GCACGTTGGAAAGGGAGGCTGA, DNMT3A rev.: AGAAGCAGGGTCCGTGGGCT, DNMT3B fwd.: TGGCACCCTCTTCTTCATTC, DNMT3B rev.: ATATACCTTTCCAGACGCGG, DNMT3L fwd.: AGCTTGCTCCTGCTTCTGA, DNMT3L rev.:CGTGGCAGAGACTACCAGAA, ALAS fwd.: TCGCCGATGCCCATTCTTATC, and ALAS rev.: GGCCCCAACTTCCATCATCT.

Three different biological samples were analyzed in duplicates and normalized to the expression of the housekeeping gene ALAS. Relative quantification was determined.

High-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

Samples (97 μl injection volume) were chromatographed by a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system (Dionex, Idstein, Germany) with a flow of 0.15 ml/min over an Uptisphere UP3HDO-150/21 column (3 μm, 2.1 mm × 150 mm) from Interchim (Interchim, Mannheim, Germany). The column temperature was maintained at 30 °C. The gradient (buffer A: 0.01% formic acid in H2O; buffer B: 0.01% formic acid in 95% MeCN/5% H2O) was the following: 0→12 min; 0%→1% buffer B; 12→20 min; 1%→2% buffer B; 20→30 min; 2%→10% buffer B; 30→35 min; 10%→80% buffer B; 35→41 min; 80% buffer B; 41→51 min; 80%→0% buffer B; and 51→60 min; 0% buffer B. Sample elution was monitored at 260 nm (Dionex Ultimate 3000 Diode Array Detector). The effluent from the first 5 min (total run time of 60min) was diverted to waste by a Valco (Macherey-Nagel GmbH and Co. KG, Düren, Germany) valve to protect the mass spectrometer. The subsequent chromatographic effluent was directly injected into the ion source of a Thermo Finnigan LTQ Orbitrap XL (ThermoFinnigan, Bremen, Germany) without prior splitting. Ions were scanned using a positive polarity mode over a full-scan range of m/z 100–500 with a resolution of 30 000. The absolute amounts of 5mC were determined by a stable isotope dilution method and then related to the dG content by UV-detection giving the relative values in percentage. Two technical replicates per sample were performed.53, 54, 55

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported financially by grants from Torsten och Ragnar Söderbergs Stiftelser, Kronprinsessan Margaretas Arbetsnämnd för synskadade, Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare, The Swedish Research Council 2009-3855, Stiftelsen för Synskadade i f.d. Malmöhus län, Ögonfonden, Charlotte and Tistou Kerstan Foundation, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; PA1751/4-1 to FPD and EXC114 to TC and SM). We like to extend our thanks to Birgitta Sandström and Hodan Abdshill for expert technical assistance regarding retinal explant experiments. We also thank Rita Wallén at the Department of Biology, Lund University for help with the EM work. Confocal analysis was performed together with Dr Bo Holmqvist at ImaGene-iT AB, Lund, Sweden, and we are thankful for his efforts in this matter.

Glossary

5mC

5-methylcytosine

DMR

differentially methylated DNA regions

DNMT

DNA methyltransferase

ONL

outer nuclear layer

RP

retinitis pigmentosa

TUNEL

terminal-dUTP-nick-end-labeling

wt

wild-type

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Disease website (http://www.nature.com/cddis)

Edited by A Verkhratsky

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1
Click here for additional data file. (6.6MB, tif)
Supplementary Table 1
Click here for additional data file. (192.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 2
Click here for additional data file. (12.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 3
Click here for additional data file. (51.7KB, xlsx)

References

  1. 1Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet 2006; 368: 1795–1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. 2Azadi S, Paquet-Durand F, Medstrand P, van Veen T, Ekström PAR. Up-regulation and increased phosphorylation of protein kinase C (PKC) δ, μ and θ in the degenerating rd1 mouse retina. Mol Cell Neurosci 2006; 31: 759–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. 3Paquet-Durand F, Silva J, Talukdar T, Johnson LE, Azadi S, van Veen T et al. Excessive activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase contributes to inherited photoreceptor degeneration in the retinal degeneration 1 mouse. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 10311–10319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. 4Sancho-Pelluz J, Alavi M, Sahaboglu A, Kustermann S, Farinelli P, Azadi S et al. Excessive HDAC activation is critical for neurodegeneration in the rd1 mouse. Cell Death Dis 2010; 1: e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. 5Mermoud JE, Rowbotham SP, Varga-Weisz PD. Keeping chromatin quiet: How nucleosome remodeling restores heterochromatin after replication. Cell Cycle 2011; 10: 4017–4025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. 6Otteson D. Eyes on DNA methylation: current evidence for DNA methylation in ocular development and disease. J Ocul Biol Dis Infor 2011; 4: 95–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. 7Wahlin KJ, Enke RA, Fuller JA, Kalesnykas G, Zack DJ, SL M. Epigenetics and cell death: DNA hypermethylation in programmed retinal cell death. PLoS One 2013; 8: e79140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. 8Kinney S, Pradhan S. Regulation of expression and activity of DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases in mammalian cells. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2011; 101: 311–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. 9Miranda TB, Jones PA. DNA methylation: the nuts and bolts of repression. J Cell Physiol 2007; 213: 384–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. 10Aapola U, Liiv I, Peterson P. Imprinting regulator DNMT3L is a transcriptional repressor associated with histone deacetylase activity. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 3602–3608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. 11Jones P. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13: 484–492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. 12Jones P, Liang G. Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10: 805–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. 13Keeler C. On the occurrence in the house mouse of mendelizing structural defect of the retina producing blindness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1926; 12: 255–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. 14Bayés M, Giordano M, Balcells S, Grinberg D, Vilageliu L, Martínez I et al. Homozygous tandem duplication within the gene encoding the β-subunit of rod phosphodiesterase as a cause for autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Hum Mutat 1995; 5: 228–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. 15Boon CJF, den Hollander AI, Hoyng CB, Cremers FPM, Klevering BJ, Keunen JEE. The spectrum of retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the peripherin/RDS gene. Progr Retinal Eye Res 2008; 27: 213–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. 16Kaur J, Mencl S, Sahaboglu A, Farinelli P, van Veen T, Zrenner E et al. Calpain and PARP activation during photoreceptor cell death in P23H and S334ter rhodopsin mutant rats. PLoS One 2011; 6: e22181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. 17Solovei I, Kreysing M, Lanctôt C, Kösem S, Peichl L, Cremer T et al. Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 137: 356–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. 18Boutorine AS, Novopashina DS, Krasheninina OA, Nozeret K, AG V. Fluorescent probes for nucleic acid visualization in fixed and live cells. Molecules 2013; 12: 15357–15397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. 19Chang B, Hawes NL, Hurd RE, Davisson MT, Nusinowitz S, Heckenlively JR. Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse. Vis Res 2002; 42: 517–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. 20Sahaboglu A, Paquet-Durand O, Dietter J, Dengler K, Bernhard-Kurz S, Ekström P et al. Retinitis pigmentosa: rapid neurodegeneration is governed by slow cell death mechanisms. Cell Death Dis 2013;Feb; 7: e488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. 21Hu S, Wan J, Su Y, Song Q, Zeng Y, Nguyen HN et al. DNA methylation presents distinct binding sites for human transcription factors. Elife 2013; 2: e00726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. 22Blattler A, Farnham PJ. Cross-talk between site-specific transcription factors and DNA methylation states. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 34287–34294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. 23Yao Y-L, Yang W-M, Seto E. Regulation of transcription factor YY1 by acetylation and deacetylation. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21: 5979–5991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. 24Bernard M, Voisin P. Photoreceptor-specific expression, light-dependent localization, and transcriptional targets of the zinc-finger protein Yin Yang 1 in the chicken retina. J Neurochem 2008; 105: 595–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. 25Zencak D, Schouwey K, Chen D, Ekström P, Tanger E, Bremner R et al. Retinal degeneration depends on Bmi1 function and reactivation of cell cycle proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2013; 110: E593–E601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. 26Bessant DA, Payne AM, Mitton KP, Wang QL, Swain PK, Plant C et al. A mutation in NRL is associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Genet 1999; 21: 355–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. 27Friedman S. The inhibition of DNA(cytosine-5)methylases by 5-azacytidine: the effect of azacytosine-containing DNA. Mol Pharmacol 1981; 19: 314–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. 28Creusot F, Acs G, Christman JK. Inhibition of DNA methyltransferase and induction of Friend erythroleukemia cell differentiation by 5-azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. J Biol Chem 1982; 257: 2041–2048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. 29Zschocke J, Manthey D, Bayatti N, van der Burg B, Goodenough S, Behl C. Estrogen receptor α-mediated silencing of caveolin gene expression in neuronal cells. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 38772–38780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. 30Christman J. 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 2002; 21: 5483–5495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. 31Steensma DP. Decitabine treatment of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res 33: S12–S17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. 32Rountree MR, Bachman KE, SB B. DNMT1 binds HDAC2 and a new co-repressor, DMAP1, to form a complex at replication foci. Nat Genet 2000; 25: 269–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. 33Fuks F, Burgers WA, Brehm A, Hughes-Davies L, T K. DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nat Genet 2000; 24: 88–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. 34Kim J, Kollhoff A, Bergmann A, Stubbs L. Methylation-sensitive binding of transcription factor YY1 to an insulator sequence within the paternally expressed imprinted gene, Peg3. Hum Mol Genet 2003; 12: 233–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. 35Chestnut BA, Chang Q, Price A, Lesuisse C, Wong M, Martin LJ. Epigenetic regulation of motor neuron cell death through DNA methylation. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 16619–16636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. 36Wang Y, Wang X, Li R, Yang Z-F, Wang Y-Z, Gong X-L et al. A DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, exacerbates neurotoxicity and upregulates Parkinson's disease-related genes in dopaminergic neurons. CNS Neurosci Ther 2013; 19: 183–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. 37Stresemann C, Lyko F. Modes of action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacytidine and decitabine. Int J Cancer 2008; 123: 8–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. 38Chang GQ, Hao Y, Wong F. Apoptosis: final common pathway of photoreceptor death in rd, rds, and rhodopsin mutant mice. Neuron 1993; 11: 595–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. 39Trifunović D, Sahaboglu A, Kaur J, Mencl S, Zrenner E, Ueffing M et al. Neuroprotective strategies for the treatment of inherited photoreceptor degeneration. Curr Mol Med 2012; 12: 598–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. 40Sahaboglu A, Tanimoto N, Kaur J, Sancho-Pelluz J, Huber G, Fahl E et al. PARP1 gene knock-out increases resistance to retinal degeneration without affecting retinal function. PLoS One 2010; 23 5: e15495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. 41Sahaboglu A, Tanimoto N, Bolz S, Garrido MG, Ueffing M, Seeliger MW et al. Knockout of PARG110 confers resistance to cGMP-induced toxicity in mammalian photoreceptors. Cell Death Dis 2014; 5: e1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. 42Fuks F, Burgers WA, Godin N, Kasai M, T K. Dnmt3a binds deacetylases and is recruited by a sequence-specific repressor to silence transcription. EMBO J 2001; 15 20: 2536–2544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. 43Rhee KD, Yu J, Zhao CY, Fan G, XJ Y. Dnmt1-dependent DNA methylation is essential for photoreceptor terminal differentiation and retinal neuron survival. Cell Death Dis 2012; 3: e427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. 44Menu dit Huart L, Lorentz O, Goureau O, Léveillard T, Sahel JA. DNA repair in the degenerating mouse retina. Mol Cell Neurosci 2004; 26: 441–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. 45Montero JA, Lorda-Diez CI, Certal AC, Moreno N, Rodriguez-Leon J, Torriglia A et al. Coordinated and sequential activation of neutral and acidic DNases during interdigital cell death in the embryonic limb. Apoptosis 2010; 15: 1197–1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. 46Hauck SM, Ekström PAR, Ahuja-Jensen P, Suppmann S, Paquet-Durand F, van Veen T et al. Differential modification of phosducin protein in degenerating rd1 retina is associated with constitutively active Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II in rod outer segments. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006; 5: 324–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. 47Arango-Gonzalez B, Trifunović D, Sahaboglu A, Kranz K, Michalakis S et al. Identification of a common non-apoptotic cell death mechanism in hereditary retinal degeneration. PLoS One 2014; 9: e112142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. 48Caffé AR, Ahuja P, Holmqvist B, Azadi S, Forsell J, Holmqvist I et al. Mouse retina explants after long-term culture in serum free medium. J Chem Neuroanat 2002; 22: 263–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. 49Paquet-Durand F, Azadi S, Hauck SM, Ueffing M, van Veen T, Ekström P. Calpain is activated in degenerating photoreceptors in the rd1 mouse. J Neurochem 2006; 96: 802–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. 50Paquet-Durand F, Hauck SM, Van Veen T, Ueffing M, Ekström P. PKG activity causes photoreceptor cell death in two retinitis pigmentosa models. J Neurochem 2009; 108: 796–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. 51Liu T, Ortiz J, Taing L, Meyer C, Lee B, Zhang Y et al. Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies. Genome Biol 2011; 12: R83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. 52Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29: e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. 53Globisch D, Münzel M, Müller M, Michalakis S, Wagner M, Koch S et al. Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS One 2010; 5: e15367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. 54Münzel M, Globisch D, Brückl T, Wagner M, Welzmiller V, Michalakis S et al. Quantification of the sixth DNA base hydroxymethylcytosine in the brain. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2010; 49: 5375–5377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. 55Schiesser S, Hackner B, Pfaffeneder T, Müller M, Hagemeier C, Truss M et al. Mechanism and stem-cell activity of 5-carboxycytosine decarboxylation determined by isotope tracing. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2012; 51: 6516–6520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. 56Sanyal S, Bal A. Comparative light and electron microscopic study of retinal histogenesis in normal and rd mutant mice. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 1973; 142: 219–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. 57Sanyal S, De Ruiter A, RK H. Development and degeneration of retina in rds mutant mice: light microscopy. J Comp Neurol 1980; 94: 193–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. 58Lewin A, Drenser K, Hauswirth W, Nishikawa S, Yasumura D, Flannery J et al. Ribozyme rescue of photoreceptor cells in a transgenic rat model of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Med 1998; 4: 967–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. 59Chen J, Makino C, Peachey N, Baylor D, Simon M. Mechanisms of rhodopsin inactivation in vivo as revealed by a COOH-terminal truncation mutant. Science 1995; 267: 374–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1
Click here for additional data file. (6.6MB, tif)
Supplementary Table 1
Click here for additional data file. (192.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 2
Click here for additional data file. (12.5KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table 3
Click here for additional data file. (51.7KB, xlsx)

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES