Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Jun 8;5:10836. doi: 10.1038/srep10836

Nodulation Characterization and Proteomic Profiling of Bradyrhizobium liaoningense CCBAU05525 in Response to Water-Soluble Humic Materials

Tong Guo Gao 1,2,*, Yuan Yuan Xu 1,*, Feng Jiang 1, Bao Zhen Li 1, Jin Shui Yang 1, En Tao Wang 3, Hong Li Yuan 1,a
PMCID: PMC4650689  PMID: 26054030

Abstract

The lignite biodegradation procedure to produce water-soluble humic materials (WSHM) with a Penicillium stain was established by previous studies in our laboratory. This study researched the effects of WSHM on the growth of Bradyrhizobium liaoningense CCBAU05525 and its nodulation on soybean. Results showed that WSHM enhanced the cell density of CCBAU05525 in culture, and increased the nodule number, nodule fresh weight and nitrogenase activity of the inoculated soybean plants. Then the chemical compounds of WSHM were analyzed and flavonoid analogues were identified in WSHM through tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide (TMAH)-py-GC/MS analysis. Protein expression profiles and nod gene expression of CCBAU05525 in response to WSHM or genistein were compared to illustrate the working mechanism of WSHM. The differently expressed proteins in response to WSHM were involved in nitrogen and carbon metabolism, nucleic acid metabolism, signaling, energy production and some transmembrane transports. WSHM was found more effective than genistein in inducing the nod gene expression. These results demonstrated that WSHM stimulated cell metabolism and nutrient transport, which resulted in increased cell density of CCBAU05525 and prepared the bacteria for better bacteroid development. Furthermore, WSHM had similar but superior functions to flavone in inducing nod gene and nitrogen fixation related proteins expression in CCBAU05525.

Soybean is an important legume that forms symbiotic root nodules with Bradyrhizobium liaoningense, bacteria that reduce atmospheric nitrogen to ammonium, which is a form of nitrogen available for plant uptake. To initiate this symbiosis process, flavonoids secreted by soybean would activate the transcription of nod genes of rhizobia, which encode lipochitooligosaccharide signal molecules, also termed Nod factors. After being recognized by the epidermal cells of the host, these Nod factors induce root hair curling and cell division, and result in root nodule formation. Rhizobia entrapped in the curled root hair could enter the roots through infection threads1.

Agricultural systems could acquire approximately 40 million tonnes of nitrogen each year through symbiotic nitrogen fixation between legumes and rhizobia2. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation is a gift from the nature which is beneficial to increasing crop yields and nutrient-use efficiency meanwhile reducing N fertilizer application. Thus, practices to stimulate nodulation, such as inoculation of soybean with rhizobia, are of great significance to sustainable agriculture; and great efforts have been made to improve the efficiency of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Previously, the application of whey (40 tonne ha−1) and inoculation with rhizobia enhanced the nodule numbers, crop growth and yield of chickpea under field conditions, which was speculated that these might be resulted from the positive effects of organic and inorganic nutrients in the whey on the plant development and the stimulation effects of whey on rhizobia activity3. Supplement of pea seeds with Nod factors secreted by Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae strain GR09 before planting resulted in a significant increase in nodule numbers, nitrogenase activity and pea yield under greenhouse and field conditions4,5. Treatment with flavonoids such as luteolin or increased flavonoids production in the plant through genetic engineering enhanced both the number of nodules and N2 fixation of alfalfa6. Flavonoids were the most potent compounds for inducing nod gene expression, while other non-flavonoid compounds such as betaines and xanthones were also able to induce nod genes in rhizobia. However, these molecules could not move in the soil freely because of their positive charges7,8. Furthermore, the functioning mechanism of whey was unclear, and it was economically infeasible to apply these compounds in the field to increase legume yield. Thus, it is of value to search for other compounds that could enhance the symbiotic nitrogen fixation efficiency and be applicable under field conditions to improve legume yield.

Humic substances are polyelectrolytic macromolecular compounds originated from the chemical and biological degradation of plants and animal residues and microbial cells9, and they play an important role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycling. Humic materials were reported to have some positive effects on different organisms, specifically through accelerating seed germination10, improving rhizome growth by stimulating ATPase activity or functioning as auxin-like phytohormone to promote the plant growth11,12, and promoting the efficient utilization of nutrients by plants13,14. However, the effects of humic materials on symbiotic nitrogen fixation had been rarely investigated except in the reports of Tan and Tantiwiramanond15 that soil humic and fulvic acids extracted by 0.1 M NaOH could increase the plant dry weight and nodule mass but not the nodule number of soybeans and peanuts under greenhouse conditions. In addition, Til’ba and Sinegovskaya16 proved in a field experiment that seed coating with sodium humate, rhizobia, ammonium molybdate and leaf spraying with sodium humate increased the nodule number and nitrogen-fixing efficiency of soybean, and the yield hence increased by 22% compared with the control. Even though, the exact role of humic materials in symbiotic nitrogen fixation and its mechanism were still unclear. Recently, the production of water-soluble humic acids (WSHM) by the biodegradation of lignite using a fungal strain Penicillium sp. P6 or an alkali-producing bacterial community was reported17,18. Furthermore, it was found previously that these humic acids could protect against the disruption of bacterial diversity that ensued from the application of urea to the soil19, and the soybean productivity was increased by 12.6% ~ 26.3% when this extract of humic acids was applied in fields (our unpublished data). In order to investigate the effects of WSHM on the growth and nodulation of rhizobia, we performed this study using Bradyrhizobium liaoningense CCBAU05525 as a model, and the functioning mechanisms of WSHM were estimated through proteomics for the first time.

Results

The effects of WSHM on nodulation of soybean under greenhouse conditions

The symbiotic features of soybean inoculated with B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 in responding to the supplement of WSHM under greenhouse conditions were shown in Table 1. The number of nodules per plant increased by 19.4% and 30.5% respectively in the 300 and 500 mg L−1 WSHM treatments, but no significant increase was observed in the 1000 mg L−1 WSHM treatment (Table 1). Moreover, the nodule fresh weight in the 500 mg L−1 WSHM treatment increased by 36.0% compared with control. Furthermore, the nitrogenase activity per plant significantly increased (from 15.1% to 30.2%) in the 300, 500 and 1000 mg L−1 WSHM treatments compared with control. Based on these observations, WSHM was concluded to have positive effects on the nodulation of soybean inoculated with B. liaoningense CCBAU05525.

Table 1. Effects of water-soluble humic material (WSHM) treatments on the nodulation of soybean in greenhousea.

  WSHM concentration (mg L−1)
Nodulation 0 (control) 300 500 1000
Number of nodules 36.0±1.00b 43.0±4.35a 47.0±3.00a 38.0±5.00b
Fresh weight of nodules (g) 0.436±0.0610b 0.547±0.0330ab 0.593±0.113a 0.554±0.0950ab
Nitrogenase activity (nmol C2H4 h−1) 22.0±2.93c 28.6±1.30a 25.3±0.320b 26.9±0.810ab
Open in a new tab

aValues are given as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate samples for nodule analysis; values with different alphabets in the same line are significantly (P < 0.05) different from each other, according to LSD test.

The effects of WSHM on the Growth of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525

As shown in Fig. 1, the cell density of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 in YM broth was significantly increased by WSHM treatments at the concentrations of 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 1500 mg L−1. The highest cell density (7.98 ± 0.56 × 109 cfu mL−1) on the fourth day of incubation observed at the WSHM concentrations of 500 mg L−1 was almost 8 times greater than that of control. The growth curves of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 (available as Supplementary Fig. S1) showed that CCBAU05525 in the 500 mg L−1 WSHM solutions increased by 9.9 × 107 mL−1. Whereas, the cell density of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 in YM broth culture supplied with WSHM increased to 8 × 1010 mL−1, which was 8 times greater than that of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 in YM broth culture without WSHM.

Figure 1. Effects of WSHM on the growth of Bradyrhizobium liaoningense CCBAU05525 in YM medium.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The data were obtained on the fourth day of incubation with shaking 140 rpm at 28 °C. Values given are mean ± standard deviation of triplicate samples; Bars with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) from each other, according to LSD test.

Identification of the chemical compounds in WSHM

By TMAH-py-GC/MS analysis, 68 compounds were identified in WSHM which fell into 4 classes: aromatics, aliphatic, nitrogen compounds and other compounds (Table 2). The aromatics that included methoxy and hydroxy benzenes, aromatic ketones and phenolic acids were the main components of the WSHM. Fatty acid methyl esters and dicarboxylic acid dimethyl esters were detected in WSHM. Sterol isomers and diterpene resin acids contents, originated mainly from lipids were also one of the important components in WSHM. Besides, N-containing compounds such as pyrroles, imidazoles, pyrimidines, piperidines and indoles were identified. The indole-like compounds identified in WSHM, indicated its potential in promoting plant growth. In addition, it was noteworthy that the 3-Hydroxy-7-methoxy-3-phenyl-4-chromanone in the WSHM had similar structure of flavonoids (C6-C3-C6). Thus, WSHM might act as flavonoid in the symbiosis between soybean and rhizobia.

Table 2. Chemical structures in water-soluble humic material detected by TMAH-py-GC/MS.

Peak No. Retention time (min) Compound Area% Formula Mr CAS
1 2.300 2-methylfuran 0.69 C5H6O 82 534-22-5
2 2.395 Acrylic acid methyl ester 2.44 C4H6O2 86 96-33-3
3 2.535 Methyl propionate 1.87 C4H8O2 88 554-12-1
4 3.600 Methacrylic acid methyl ester 0.87 C5H8O2 100 80-62-6
5 4.210 2-chloroethyl methyl ether 2.25 C3H7ClO 94 627-42-9
6 4.415 (Dimethylamino) acetonitrile 4.43 C4H8N2 84 926-64-7
7 4.475 Pyrrole 2.45 C4H5N 67 109-97-7
8 4.710 Toluene 4.06 C7H8 92 108-88-3
9 5.145 2-Hydroxy-2-methyl-6-hepten-3-one 0.54 C8H14O2 142 996-61-2
10 5.575 3-(Octylamino) propanenitrile 0.58 C11H22N2 182 29504-89-0
11 5.690 Hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane 0.15 C6H8O3Si3 222 541-5-9
12 5.845 N,N-dimethyl-2-phosphinoethanamine 1.07 C4H12NP 105 161944-90-7
13 6.175 2-cyclopenten-1-one 0.82 C5H6O 82 930-30-3
14 6.755 Ethylbenzene 0.52 C8H10 106 100-41-4
15 6.815 2,5-Dimethylpyrrole 0.38 C6H9N 95 625-84-3
16 6.960 Dimethylbenzene 1.17 C8H10 106 95-47-6
17 7.435 1,3,5,7-Cyclooctatetraene 1.09 C8H8 108 629-20-9
18 7.960 Methoxybenzene 0.68 C7H8O 108 100-66-3
19 8.985 6-(Hydroxy-phenyl-methyl)-2,2-dimethyl-cyclohexanone 1.23 C15H20O2 232 CID557652 (NCBI no.)
20 9.205 Oktamethylcyklotetrasiloxan 0.39 C8H24O4Si4 296 556-67-2
21 9.555 Phenol 3.13 C6H6O 94 108-95-2
22 9.655 3-(Octylamino)Propanenitrile 1.03 C11H22N2 182 29504-89-0
23 10.095 (+)-dimethyl 2,3-O-benzylidene-D-tartrate 2.27 C13H14O6 266 38270-70-1
24 10.275 Butanedioic acid, dimethyl ester 2.86 C6H10O4 146 106-65-0
25 10.860 2-Methylphenol 0.77 C7H8O 108 95-48-7
26 11.010 2-Propenoic acid, 2-benzoylamino-3-phenyl,ethyl ester 0.57 C18H17NO3 295 32089-78-4
27 11.080 3-Ethyl-2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one 0.35 C7H10O2 126 21835-1-8
28 11.350 3,4,4-Trimethyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one 3.25 C8H12O 124 30434-65-2
29 11.455 N-methylsuccinimide 4.4 C5H7NO2 113 1121-7-9
30 12.300 o-Dimethoxybenzene 0.94 C8H10O2 138 91-16-7
31 13.550 2,4-Imidazolidinedione,3,5,5-trimethyl- 0.8 C6H10N2O2 142 6345-19-3
32 13.600 S-(2,5-Dihydroxyphenyl) cyclohexylthiocarbamate 1.1 C13H17NO3S 267 345259-5-4
33 14.465 N-methylindolea 0.65 C9H9N 131 603-76-9
34 14.575 Dimethyl(2E,4E)-2,4-hexadienedioate 0.52 C8H10O4 170 1733-37-5
35 14.940 Benzeneacetonitrile 1.09 C8H7N 117 140-29-4
36 15.430 Piperidine, 1,1-methylenebis- 3.44 C11H22N2 182 880-9-1
37 15.855 1,2,4-Trimethoxybenzene 0.33 C9H12O3 168 135-77-3
38 15.930 1,3-Dimethylindolea 0.35 C10H11N 145 875-30-9
39 16.030 Benzoic acid, 4-methoxy-, methyl ester 0.5 C9H10O3 166 121-98-2
40 16.160 Methyl 5-oxo-2-pyrrolidinecarboxylate 2.55 C6H9NO3 143 54571-66-3
41 16.790 N-methylphthalimide 0.73 C9H7NO2 161 550-44-7
42 17.060 2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione 2.01 C7H10N2O2 154 4401-71-2
43 17.440 3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzylamine 0.56 C10H15NO3 197 18638-99-8
44 17.955 Dodecanoic acid, methyl ester 1.370 C13H26O2 214 111-82-0
45 18.485 (3Z)-1-Methyl-1H-indole-2,3-dione 3-hydrazonea 0.490 C9H9N3O 175 3265-23-4
46 18.755 Methyl 3,5-dimethoxybenzoate 3.140 C10H12O4 196 2150-37-0
47 18.870 Benzoic acid, 3,4-dimethoxy-,methyl ester 0.920 C10H12O4 196 2150-38-1
48 20.425 3,4,5-Trimethoxybenzoic acid, methyl ester 1.950 C11H14O5 226 1916-7-0
49 20.480 Methyl tetradecanoate 0.910 C15H30O2 242 124-10-7
50 21.320 Pentadecanoic acid, methyl eater 0.510 C16H32O2 256 7132-64-1
51 22.115 1H-purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl 0.530 C8H10N4O2 194 58-8-2
52 22.350 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 0.660 C17H34O2 270 112-39-0
53 22.760 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester 3.430 C17H34O2 270 112-39-0
54 23.510 4-[2-(4-Hydroxy-phenyl)-viny]-benzoic acid 0.850 C15H12O3 240 152027-61-7
55 23.680 Cyclopropaneoctanoic acid, 2-hexyl-,methyl ester 0.450 C18H34O2 282 10152-61-1
56 23.745 3-Hydroxy-7-methoxy-3-phenyl-4-chromanoneb 1.140 C16H14O4 270 18380-57-9
57 24.590 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-,methyl ester 1.240 C19H36O2 296 112-62-9
58 24.645 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-,methyl ester 0.710 C19H36O2 296 112-62-9
59 24.830 Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester 1.340 C19H38O2 298 112-61-8
60 25.690 10-Nonadecenoic acid, methyl ester 0.460 C20H38O2 310 56599-83-8
61 26.085 2-Phenanthrenamine, 9,10-dihydro-7-nitro- 8.500 C14H12N2O2 240 18264-82-9
62 26.760 1-Phenanthrenecarboxylic acid, 7-ethenyl-1,2,3,4,4a,4b,5,6,7,8,10,10a -dodecahydro-1,4a,7-trimethyl-,methyl ester, (1R,4aR,4bS,7S,10aR)- 1.930 C21H32O2 316 1686-62-0
63 26.860 6-Methyl-4-phenyl-3-cyanopyridine-2(1H)-thione 1.980 C13H10N2S 226 78564-23-5
64 26.920 Methyl 5-[2-(3-furyl)ethyl]-1,4a-dimethyl-6-methylidene-decalin-1-carboxylate 2.070 C21H30O3 330 10267-15-9
65 27.060 Methyl dehydroabietyate 2.010 C21H30O2 314 1235-74-1
66 27.540 Methyl abietate 0.490 C21H32O2 316 127-25-3
67 29.145 7-Oxodehydroabietic acid, methyl ester 0.600 C21H28O3 328 110936-78-2
68 30.175 Tetracosanoic acid, methyl ester 0.440 C25H50O2 382 2442-49-1
Open in a new tab

aIndole-like Compounds.

bFlavonoid-like compound.

Proteome analysis of B. liaoningense in response to WSHM and genistein

In the assay of proteomics, a total of 1,900 protein spots were identified by 2-D electrophoresis across all samples, 15 of which were up-regulated and 15 down-regulated by WSHM treatment. 7 and 9 proteins were up- and down-regulated respectively by genistein , all of which were among the 30 WSHM-affected proteins (Fig. 2). Among these 30 proteins, 27 were identified based on their similarity with reported sequences, which were divided into three groups: 1) protein expression was increased or decreased by both WSHM and genistein treatments; 2) protein expression was increased by genistein but decreased or not significantly altered by WSHM; 3) protein expression was increased by WSHM but decreased or not significantly altered by genistein (Table 3).

Figure 2. 2-D Electrophoresis of the proteins of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 following different treatments.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

a: control; b: treatment with water-soluble humic materials; c: treatment with genistein.

Table 3. Proteins identified in B. liaoningense CCBAU 05525 treated by genistein and water-soluble humic acid.

Category Spot No. Protein description* Protein source NCBI Access NO. Participation in (function) WSHM vs. control Genistein vs. control
1 39 nitrogen regulatory protein PII Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 gi|27375723 regulate glutamine synthetase 5.58 1.41
  168 iron-regulated outer membrane protein Mannheimia haemolytica BOVINE gi|261491674 adapt to the iron-restricted environment inside the host 3.35 1.15
  395 isopropylmalate isomerase small subunit Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 gi|27375606 Leu biosynthetic pathway and the Met chain elongation 5.20 1.10
  695 GroEL protein Asaia bogorensis gi|269913095 proper folding of many proteins 3.38 2.31
  1252 replication protein A Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 gi|222109068 DNA replication, repair and recombination 7.22 1.67
  1860 ATP synthase FliI/YscN Phaeobacter gallaeciensis BS107 gi|163738066 ATP binding protein 13.17 2.76
  158 glutamine synthetase protein Rhizobium etli CIAT 652 gi|190892623 degradation of amino acids 0.27 0.76
  165 DNA polymerase III subunit delta Rhodoferax ferrireducens T118 gi|89899570 prokaryotic DNA replication 0.34 0.89
  209 DNA-directed RNA polymerase, beta subunit Neisseria polysaccharea ATCC 43768 gi|297250922 transcription of DNA into RNA 0.46 0.97
  371 aminoacyl-histidine dipeptidase Vibrio mimicus VM603 gi|258627332 catalyze dipeptides and tripeptides 0.20 0.97
  459 hypothetical protein CAMRE0001_2526 Campylobacter rectus RM3267 gi|223040483 Unknown 0.38 0.68
  518 glycosyl hydrolase family 3 protein Escherichia coli MS 21-1 gi|300936554 Hydrolyse the glycosidic bond between carbohydrates 0.19 0.74
  579 DNA-cytosine methyltransferase Rhodopseudomonas palustris DX-1 gi|316931670 transfer of methyl group to DNA 0.40 0.72
  820 Lon-A peptidase Novosphingobium aromaticivorans DSM 12444 gi|87199382 regulates gene expression 0.20 0.55
  970 hypothetical protein VMC_13940 Vibrio alginolyticus 40B gi|269965870 Unknown 0.25 0.91
  1781 conserved hypothetical protein Pseudovibrio sp. JE062 gi|254470700 Unknown 0.02 0.88
2 1110 aldehyde dehydrogenase Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 gi|27377927 oxidation of aldehydes 0.40 1.43
  1854 sensor histidine kinase Geobacter sulfurreducens KN400 gi|298504392 signal transduction 0.65 3.78
  1856 hypothetical protein Swoo_4462 Shewanella woodyi ATCC 51908 gi|170728783 Unknown ND 1.22
  1858 putative phosphoribulokinase protein Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 gi|27377693 Carbon fixation etc. 0.67 1.95
3 112 threonine ammonia-lyase, biosynthetic Vibrio harveyi HY01 gi|153834318 biosynthesis of amino acids Unique ND
  147 molybdenum ABC transporter, periplasmic molybdate-binding protein Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 gi|291613363 high affinity molybdate uptake system 2.43 0.95
  708 ACT domain-containing protein Pantoea sp. At-9b gi|317053226 amino acid and purine synthesis 3.30 0.49
  828 hypothetical protein amb3581 Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1 gi|83312680 Unknown 2.81 0.56
  1087 putative phage-related protein Rhizobium etli GR56 gi|218672483 Unknown 1.61 0.58
  1859 ABC transporter substrate-binding protein Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 gi|27376323 translocation RNA and DNA etc. repair 3.29 0.31
  1861 hypothetical protein xccb100_1606 Xanthomonas campestris B100 gi|188991002 putative peptidase/protease 5.59 0.64
Open in a new tab

*The proteins marked in boldface letters are those up regulated or down regulated by both the WS and Genistein.

Proteins belonging to the first category included nitrogen regulatory protein PII, iron-regulated outer membrane protein, isopropylmalate isomerase small subunit, GroEL protein, replication protein A, and ATP synthase FliI/YscN, which were all up-regulated, and glutamine synthetase protein, DNA polymerase III subunit delta, DNA-directed RNA polymerase, beta subunit, aminoacyl-histidine dipeptidase, hypothetical protein CAMRE0001_2526, glycosyl hydrolase family 3 protein, DNA-cytosine methyltransferase, and Lon-A peptidase which were all down-regulated. Aldehyde dehydrogenase, sensor histidine kinase, hypothetical protein Swoo_4462, and the putative phosphoribulokinase protein which fell into the second category were all up-regulated by genistein but down-regulated by WSHM. Molybdenum ABC transporter, threonine ammonia-lyase, ACT domain-containing protein, hypothetical protein amb3581, putative phage-related protein, ABC transporter substrate-binding protein and hypothetical protein xccb100_1606 in the third category were all up-regulated by WSHM but down-regulated by genistein.

QRT-PCR assay

Quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) showed that most gene expression data were consistent with the results of the analysis of proteomics, although differences in the rate of gene expression existed between the WSHM treatment and the control (Table 4). For example, nitrogen regulatory protein PII was up-regulated 5.58-fold by WSHM according to the proteomics results (Table 3), but a 17.26-fold difference was observed with RT-PCR (Table 4). Likewise, the apparent expression of the DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta subunit and the putative phosphoribulokinase protein differed significantly with the two methods. These differences might be a reflection of the post-transcriptional and/or post-translational phenomena and required further investigation.

Table 4. Expression of some genes induced by WSHM detected by Real Time PCR.

    Expression* (×10−2) induced by
Spot No. Protein Genistein Control WSHM
39 nitrogen regulatory protein PII 1.14 ± 0.0100b 0.220 ± 0.0600c 3.76 ± 0.160a
209 DNA-directed RNA polymerase, beta subunit 6.35 ± 0.0500b 3.10 ± 0.0300b 59.4 ± 3.11a
395 isopropylmalate isomerase small subunit 6.26 ± 0.0800b 1.52 ± 0.0600c 30.7 ± 2.22a
1858 putative phosphoribulokinase protein 86.4 ± 3.99a 20.4 ± 0.270c 58.7 ± 1.42b
1859 ABC transporter substrate-binding protein 1.95 ± 0.210b 1.74 ± 0.510b 39.8 ± 0.800a
1860 ATP synthase FliI/YscN 0.610 ± 0.0400b 0.250 ± 0.0200c 2.47 ± 0.460a
Open in a new tab

Assays were performed in triplicate, and the mean values and SDs are shown. Values in the same line having different letters are significantly different from each other according to LSD test (P < 0.05).

*Fold change in gene expression (vs 16s rDNA).

Besides, nod gene expression changes resulted from WSHM or genistein treatments were also investigated. QRT-PCR analyses revealed that the expression of nodD1, nodD2 and nodA increased significantly (P < 0.05) by WSHM treatment (Fig. 3). The expression of these genes reached the highest level 3 hours after the addition of WSHM to the cultures, which were 29.7-, 14.3- and 32.8-fold to those of the control respectively. However, the expression increase came to a halt, except for nodD1, 7 hours after WSHM addition. Similar results were observed in the genistein treatment, but the induction by genistein was significantly lower than that by WSHM.

Figure 3. The expression pattern of nodD and nodA genes in Bradyrhizobium liaoningense CCBAU05525 induced by water-soluble humic materials or genistein.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

a: nodD1; b: nodD2; c: nodA. The data are expressed as mean ± SD values (n = 3). The statistical significance among the data set was assessed by LSD test (P < 0.05).

Discussion

Symbiotic nitrogen fixation plays an important role in sustainable agriculture, and this study demonstrated that WSHM, the humic acids, produced by biodegradation of lignite, possesses the ability to enhance symbiotic association between B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 and soybean plants. A WSHM concentration of 500 mg L−1 resulted in the maximal enhancement of cell density and nodulation of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525. According to our other studies, 375 g WSHM per hectare per year would contribute to 12.6% ~ 26.3% increases in the soybean yield (Our unpublished data). Furthermore, the identification of indole-like compounds in WSHM (Table 2) indicated the potential of WSHM in promoting plant growth. Since the WSHM used in this study was water, acid and alkali soluble. Thus, it was not only economically feasible but also profitable to use WSHM as a fertilizer in agriculture.

It was reported that humic acids could not only acting as C or energy source, but also stimulate bacterial growth by regulating cell metabolism20,21. In this study, similar results were observed. As shown in supplementary figure S1, the cell density of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 in the 500 mg L−1 WSHM solution increased, which meant that WSHM could be used by the bacterium as nutrients; while the eight times of growth increase of CCBAU05525 in the YM broth supplied with 500 mg L−1 WSHM evidenced its stimulation function. Furthermore, the cell density in treatments of 1000 mg L−1 and 1500 mg L−1 WSHM were lower than that in 500 mg L−1 WSHM treatment (Fig. 1), indicating that 500 mg L−1 was the optimum concentration of WSHM in promoting growth of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525. Nonetheless, the 500 mg L−1 WSHM used in this study contained 52.18% and 3.72% of C and N, respectively18, which might account for the diauxic growth pattern of the bacteria in WSHM-treated cultures after the 7th day (Supplementary Fig. S1). These results all suggested that WSHM could serve as nutrients in the growth of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525, but their nutrient effects were negligible. Thus, the stimulation effects of WSHM on B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 growth was mainly attributed to its regulation on cell metabolism and nutrient transport which were demonstrated in the proteomics assay.

In the proteomics assay, proteins of the first category might be involved in the early stages of nodulation, such as Nod factor biosynthesis or the switch from the free-living to the symbiotic living stage. The changes in expression levels (up or down) of these proteins remained the same in both WSHM and genistein treatments, but the WSHM treatment caused a consistent greater increase or decrease than the genistein treatment, indicating that the effects of WSHM were stronger than those of genistein. The differences observed in the second and third categories demonstrated that WSHM had different effects on B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 compared with genistein. Other chemical compounds in WSHM except for flavonoid analogue might also have positive effects on the nodulation of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 and be even better than genistein.

Belonging to the first category, nitrogen regulatory protein PII was an essential component of a highly efficient system that regulated nitrogen assimilation. This system coordinated the intracellular concentration of glutamine and 2-ketoglutarate to ensure the appropriate regulation of glutamine synthetase (GS) activity and expression of the glnALG operon22,23. Besides, it was a fundamental step to switch off assimilating ammonia during bacteroid development. Furthermore, most aspects of cell growth and division, including the synthesis of nucleic acid were reduced during bacteroid development2, while, ATP synthesis was always essential to nodulation, protein synthesis and active transport. Considering the fact that glutamine synthetase protein, DNA polymerase III subunit delta, DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta subunit and DNA-cytosine methyltransferase were down-regulated and nitrogen regulatory protein PII and ATP synthase FliI/YscN protein were up-regulated by WSHM and genistein, the WSHM (like genistein) probably prepared the bacteria for better bacteroid development.

The chaperonin GroEL which played an essential role in ensuring proteins properly folded, preventing and repairing harmful effects, was highly conserved in evolution24,25. This protein enhances the expression of nod genes26, and was essential to the formation of a functional nitrogenase complex in the bacteroids of B. japonicum27. In addition, it interacted with the NifA polypeptide and enhanced nif gene expression28. Thus the upregulated expression of GroEL demonstrated that WSHM had positive effects on the expression of nod, nif genes and the formation of nitrogenase complex.

It was reported that molybdenum ABC transporter permease protein, molybdenum processing protein, molybdenum transport system permease protein and many ABC transporter substrate-binding proteins were only found to be expressed in 21-day-old bacteroids of Bradyrhizobium japonicum but not in free-living cells29. The molybdenum ABC transporter and iron-regulated outer membrane protein transported molybdenum and iron respectively. Iron and molybdenum were essential to nitrogen fixation because of their necessity as nitrogenase co-factors2. Therefore, up-regulating of these three transporter-associated proteins might be the reason for the increase in nodule fresh weight and nitrogenase activity of soybean by WSHM treatment.

With the proteomic assay, it was concluded that WSHM regulated the nitrogen metabolism, carbon metabolism, energy production, nutrient transport and signaling of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525. On one hand, WSHM had similar but superior effect on the expression of proteins in category 1 compared with genistein. On the other hand, WSHM had different effects on the expression of some proteins related to nitrogen fixation compared with genistein. Specifically, the protein expression pattern changed by WSHM was beneficial to the bacteroid development and the increase in nitrogenase activity.

Flavonoids secreted by host plant induce expression of nodD gene which then regulated the transcription of the structure genes (such as nodABC) to synthesis Nod factor30. Therefore, they were essential to the symbiosis between the legumes and rhizobia31. It was shown in this study that WSHM increased nodD1, nodD2, nodA gene expression of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525, which might be the reason for the increase in the nodule number and nitrogenase activity of soybean in the greenhouse experiments. The enhanced expression of nod genes by humic acids in B. liaoningense had not been reported previously. As expected, genistein also increased the expression of nodD1, nodD2, nodA gene. WSHM contained flavonoid analogue, which might account for its contribution to nodD1, nodD2, nodA gene expression. However, WSHM treatment caused a greater increase in the expression of these genes than genistein did, similar to the tendency of the proteins in category 1 shown in proteomics assay, indicating that the effects of WSHM were stronger than those of genistein. However, the higher concentration of WSHM used in the experiment might partially account for the greater effects. In addition, another explanation might be the complex mixture of components present in the WSHM treatment (Table 2), in which there might be some strong inducers for particular metabolic procedures; since B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 responded to WSHM and genistein differently in category 2 and 3 in proteomics assay. These strong inducers in the WSHM compounds had great potential in the development of new materials to stimulate the symbiotic nitrogen fixation between rhizobium and legume.

The failure to find NodD1, NodD2, and NodA in the analysis of proteomics might be due to their low abundance, since all of them are regulators for the expression of other genes. The function of several hypothetical proteins affected by WSHM treatment would be examined in future work. Also, the mechanism of WSHM in promoting nodulation of soybean with B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 needed to be further investigated, such as the effects of WSHM on the formation of infection thread of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525.

Conclusively, WSHM treatment increased the number of soybean nodules, the nodule fresh weight and the nitrogenase activity, as well as enhanced the cell density of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525. WSHM contained flavonoid analogues and showed similar bioactivities with genistein but had wider effects than genistein such as inducing the expression of nodD1, nodD2, nodA, and up-regulating a range of proteins involved in a variety of metabolic pathways. Furthermore, several nitrogen fixation-associated proteins such as molybdenum ABC transporter were also affected. Therefore, WSHM might prepare the free-living rhizobia for better bacteroid development. This was the first study about the effects of humic acids on rhizobia growth, nod gene expression and proteomics. These results shed new light on the effects of humic material on legumes and demonstrated great application value in improving soybean production.

Materials and methods

Water-soluble humic materials

Lignite was collected from the Huolingele Minerals Administration coal mine, Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region, Northwest China. Water-soluble humic materials (WSHM) was extracted according to a previously described protocol32.

Plant nodulation test

B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 was obtained from the Culture Collection of China Agriculture University, Beijing, China33. This strain was cultured aerobically at 28 °C in YM broth (Mannitol, 10 g; NaCl, 0.1 g; K2HPO4, 0.25 g; KH2PO4, 0.25 g; Yeast Extract, 0.8 g; MgSO4·7 H2O, 0.2 g; pH 6.8–7.0). Bacterial culture with approximately 106 cells and 5 mL of the WSHM solution with different concentration (0, 300, 500 and 1000 mg L−1) were used for inoculating soybean. Soybean seeds were surface-sterilized by successive treatments with 95% ethanol for 30 sec and 0.2% HgCl2 for 5 min, and were then washed for 6 times by sterile water. Then the surface-sterilized seeds were germinated on 0.8% agar-water plates in the dark at 28 °C for 24–48 h. Germinated seeds were planted in vermiculite moisturized with low-N nutrient solution in pots34 and were inoculated with 1 mL of bacterial culture and 5 mL of WSHM solution or 5 mL of sterile water as control per plant. For each treatment, 30 pots were selected and divided into three parallel groups. In each group, there were 10 plants in 10 pots. The average value of each group was taken as one sample value. Plants were grown in greenhouse at 25/17 ± 2 °C for day/night with 60% relative humidity. Pots were rearranged daily to give a random distribution of growth conditions in the greenhouse. After 35 days, all the soybean plants were harvested to detect the number, weight and nitrogenase activity (acetylene reduction assay) of the nodules35.

Effects of WSHM on the growth of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525

It was known that the cell density of rhizobia around the plant roots must reach a threshold level for adequate nodulation. Thus, the effects of WSHM on the growth of B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 were analyzed. The strain was preincubated in 50 mL of YM broth for 4 days at 28 °C under shaking (140 rpm). Then, the CCBAU05525 culture was inoculated at a ratio of 1% (v/v) into 200 mL of YM broth supplied with WSHM at the final concentrations of 0, 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 1500 mg L−1, respectively. The flasks containing the inoculated YM broth were incubated at 28 °C under shaking (140 rpm) for four days up to the middle exponential phase and culture samples were taken to evaluate the rhizobial cell density by dilution-plating procedure. The results were then used to choose the suitable WSHM concentration for the study of the effects of WSHM on the growth curve (up to 10 days of incubation) and the nod gene expression and proteomics of rhizobia.

TMAH-py-GC/MS of WSHM samples

The Py-GC/MS system used in this study was a combination of a PY-2020S pyrolyzer (Frontier Laboratories Ltd., Japan) and Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy) equipped with commercial mass spectral libraries (Nist107). All the WSHM samples (ca. 200 μg) were placed on a ferromagnetic pyrofoil, and 2 μL of tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide (TMAH) aqueous solution (10%, w/v) were added to the samples. The pyrolysis temperature was 550 °C, and the total heating time was 10 sec. The pyrolysis products were transported to the GC/MS, and separated on the GC equipped with a UA-5MS capillary column (Frontier Laboratories Ltd., Japan, 30 m × 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 μm thickness). The temperature protocol used was 6 °C min−1 from 40 °C (3 min) to 300 °C (10 min) with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The mass spectra of compounds were measured at 70 eV. The products released from pyrolysis were differentiated based on a search in the mass spectral library (Nist107) comparing the relative retention time and other Py-GC/MS data of humic acids (HA) and fulvic acids (FA)36,37.

Protein preparation and extraction

B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 was pre-cultured aerobically at 28 °C to the early exponential phase (OD600 = 0.4 ~ 0.5) in 200 mL YM broth. Then, 100 μL of 1 mM (final concentration of 0.5 μM) genistein, which was a known flavonoid specific for the Nod factor induction in soybean rhizobia38,39; or 5 mL WSHM (at a concentration of 20 g L−1) were added and the incubation continued to the mid-exponential phase (OD600 = 0.7 ~ 0.8). Cultures without addition of the inducers were included as a control. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (8,000 × g, 10 min) at 4 °C, the cell pellet was washed with 50 mL NaCl solution (0.85%), resuspended in the same solution at a concentration of 0.5 g mL−1, and frozen at −80 °C in aliquots of 50–100 μL for Proteins extraction.

Proteins were extracted using the phenol/ammonium acetate method as described previously40 with slight modifications. Cell samples (1 g) were homogenized in 3 mL extraction buffer, and the protein concentration was determined using 2D Quant Kit (GE Healthcare) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

2-D electrophoresis, imaging and data analysis

For 2-D electrophoresis, proteins were separated by isoelectric focusing (IEF) in the first dimension and SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. Samples were adjusted to a final concentration of 1.2 mg of protein in 450 μL DeStreak rehydration solution (GE Healthcare). Isoelectric point gel (IPG) strips (24 cm, diameter of 0.5 cm, pH 3–10; (GE Healthcare) were rehydrated with the sample and cover fluid and electrophoresed as described41. After IEF, the strip was equilibrated and placed on a large format 13% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel (26 × 20 cm) for SDS-PAGE as described42. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with colloidal CBB (20% ethanol, 1.6% phosphoric acid, 8% ammonium sulfate, 0.08% CBB G-250) and imaged using a UMAX imagescanner. The image was analyzed using ImageMaster 2D Platinum v 5.0 software. At least three replicate gels of three different protein preparations were analyzed for consistency. If the change in the relative area of a protein spot was greater than 1.5-fold and shown to be statistically significant by the t-test (P < 0.05) using SPSS software, the protein expression level was considered to be modified by the treatment.

In-gel digestion and protein identification

Protein spots that showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the 2-D electrophoresis experiment were excised manually, and in-gel digested overnight at 37 °C with sequencing grade modified trypsin (Promega, USA). Tryptic peptides (0.5 mL) were mixed with a saturated solution of α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) in 50% (w/v) acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The mixture was spotted onto a MALDI sample plate and crystallized at room temperature. The same procedure was used for the standard peptide calibration mixture (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Mass spectra were acquired using a MALDI-TOF-MS Autoflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) operating in the PMF fully automated mode, or manually in the LIFT mode in the case of MALDI-TOF/TOF. PMFs and MS/MS ions were searched against the NCBI nr/Proteobacteria database using MASCOT software (Matrix Science, UK). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) covering a total of 2270 B. japonicum genes and showing a complete or nearly complete pathway in several cases43 was used to identify the possible pathways affected by WSHM treatment. Enzymes and proteins annotated under the global KEGG category metabolism were identified.

Quantitative Real-time PCR assay

Quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) was used to confirm the results of the proteomics experiments and detect the effects of WSHM on nodD and nodA gene expression. Cells were cultured as described above, except that the cells were collected at 1, 3 and 7 h after WSHM or genistein was added as inducer for nod gene expression. Total RNAs were isolated using TRIzol reagent (TIANGEN, Beijing) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. First strand cDNAs were synthesized using PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (RT) (TaKaRa Code: D2680S) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT samples were used for quantitative RT-PCR with the primers shown in Table 5, which were designed using the program Premier 5.0 based on the B. liaoningense CCBAU05525 genome sequence33. Expression of 16S rRNA was used as an internal control for normalization. Each reaction contained 10 μL of Power SYBR Green master Mix (ABI, USA) in a final volume of 20 μL. The PCR program was as follows: (i) 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 sec, 60 °C for 35 sec. PCR was performed on an ABI 7500 Thermo cycler and data were analyzed using ABI software (Foster City, USA).

Table 5. Primers used in this study.

Name of primers Primer sequence (5’-3’) Corresponding gene Tm (°C)
16S rRNA gene (341f) CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG 16S rRNA 58.1
16S rRNA gene (534r) ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG   58.6
39F TCGGCGTTCACGGTCTCA glnK 61.1
39R TGGCGTCGATGGTCTTGT   57.2
209F TCGGCGAACTCATGGAGAA Gene for DNA-directed RNA polymerase, beta subunit 60.5
209R GCTGCGAGGAACCGAAGAA   61.1
1859F CTCTACGAAGGCACCGACTG Gene for ABC transporter substrate-binding 60.0
1859R CGGGAATGACCTGCCAGTAG   60.3
395F CGATCCGCGTCAGCCAGGAA leuD 63.9
395R AGGCAGTGCTTGCGGAACG   61.8
1858F ATTCGGACCTGCTGTTCTACG cbbP 59.4
1858R TCCGCCGCAGAATGGTGT   62.7
1860F GCTCGCGGTCGCCGAATAT Gene for ATP synthase FliI/YscN 65.6
1860R CGGCAACTCGGTGAAGACG   62.1
nodAF GAGCCTTCGTTGGGAAAGTG Gene for acyltransferase 60
nodAR CGCAGTAGCCCGATGTGAG   60
nodD1F CGCACTGAGACCGAACCT Gene for a member of the NodD family of LysR-type transcriptional regulators 60
nodD1R CAGTCGTAAGGGCATCGT   60
nodD2F TTGGGACGAACCGCATAG Gene for a regulator of Nod factor production 60
nodD2R GGGTCGCTGTTGTGAAGTG   60
Open in a new tab

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Gao, T.G. et al. Nodulation Characterization and Proteomic Profiling of Bradyrhizobium liaoningense CCBAU05525 in Response to Water-Soluble Humic Materials. Sci. Rep. 5, 10836; doi: 10.1038/srep10836 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep10836-s1.pdf (92.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National High Technoligy Research and Development Programme of China (No. 2011AA10A206) and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201403048-2).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions TGG, FJ, JSY and HLY conceived and designed the study. TGG and YYX performed the experiments. TGG and YYX wrote the manuscript text. TGG prepared samples for proteomic analysis, and performed the statistical analysis and YYX performed the QRT-PCR assay. YYX, FJ and BZL participated in the preparation of water-soluble humic materials. ETW helped to design the experiments and draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Oldroyd G. E., Murray J. D., Poole P. S. & Downie J. A. The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis. Annu Rev Genet 45, 119–144 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Udvardi M. & Poole P. S. Transport and metabolism in legume-rhizobia symbioses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64, 781–805 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Erman M. et al. Effects of Rhizobium, arbuscular mycorrhiza and whey applications on some properties in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions 1—Yield, yield components, nodulation and AMF colonization. Field Crop Res 122, 14–24 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. Siczek A., Lipiec J., Wielbo J., Szarlip P. & Kidaj D. Pea growth and symbiotic activity response to Nod factors (lipo-chitooligosaccharides) and soil compaction. Appl Soil Ecol 72, 181–186 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  5. Siczek A., Lipiec J., Wielbo J., Kidaj D. & Szarlip P. Symbiotic activity of pea (Pisum sativum) after application of Nod factors under field conditions. Int J Mol Sci 15, 7344–7351 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kapulnik Y., Joseph C. M. & Phillips D. A. Flavone limitations to root nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in alfalfa. Plant Physiol 84, 1193–1196 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Phillips D. A., Joseph C. M. & Maxwell C. A. Trigonelline and stachydrine released from alfalfa seeds activate NodD2 protein in Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol 99, 1526–1531 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Subramanian S., Stacey G. & Yu O. Distinct, crucial roles of flavonoids during legume nodulation. Trends Plant Sci 12, 282–285 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayes M. & Wilson W. Humic substances, peats and sludges: Health and environmental aspects. (Elsevier, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  10. Traversa A. et al. Comparative evaluation of compost humic acids and their effects on the germination of switchgrass (Panicum vigatum L.). J Soil Sediment 14, 432–440 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Jindo K. et al. Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant Soil 353, 209–220 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. Canellas L. P. et al. Chemical composition and bioactivity properties of size-fractions separated from a vermicompost humic acid. Chemosphere 78, 457–466 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jannin L. et al. Microarray analysis of humic acid effects on Brassica napus growth: Involvement of N, C and S metabolisms. Plant Soil 359, 297–319 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Tahir M. M., Khurshid M., Khan M. Z., Abbasi M. K. & Kazmi M. H. Lignite-Derived Humic Acid Effect on Growth of Wheat Plants in Different Soils. Pedosphere 21, 124–131 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. Tan K. H. & Tantiwiramanond D. Effect of humic acids on nodulation and dry matter production of soybean, peanut, and clover. Soil sci soc Am. J. 47, 1121–1124 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  16. Til’ba V. A. & Sinegovskaya V. T. Role of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in increasing photosynthetic productivity of soybean. Russ Agric Sci 38, 361–363 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. Yuan H. L., Yang J. S., Wang F. Q. & Chen W. X. Degradation and solubilization of Chinese lignite by Penicillium sp. P6. Appl Biochem Micro 42, 52–55 (2006). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao T. G., Jiang F., Yang J. S., Li B. Z. & Yuan H. L. Biodegradation of Leonardite by an alkali-producing bacterial community and characterization of the degraded products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93, 2581–2590 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dong L., Córdova-Kreylos A. L., Yang J., Yuan H. & Scow K. M. Humic acids buffer the effects of urea on soil ammonia oxidizers and potential nitrification. Soil Biol Biochem 41, 1612–1621 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Richard A. Kirschner Jr., Bruce C. Parker & III, J. O. F. Humic and fulvic acids stimulate the growth of Mycobacterium avium. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 30, 327–332 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tikhonov V., Yakushev A., Zavgorodnyaya Y. A., Byzov B. & Demin V. Effects of humic acids on the growth of bacteria. Eurasian Soil Sci 43, 305–313 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  22. Dixon R. & Kahn D. Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. Nat Rev Microbiol 2, 621–631 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huergo L. F., Chandra G. & Merrick, (II) signal transduction proteins: nitrogen regulation and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37, 251–283 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ranson N., White H. & Saibil H. Chaperonins. Biochem. J 333, 233–242 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gomes D. F., Batista J. S. d. S., Schiavon A. L., Andrade D. S. & Hungria M. Proteomic profiling of Rhizobium tropici PRF 81 identification of conserved and specific responses to heat stress. BMC Microbiol 12, 1–12 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wais R. J., Wells D. H. & Long S. R. Analysis of differences between Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 and 2011 strains using the host calcium spiking response. Mol plant microbe In 15, 1245–1252 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fischer H.-M., Schneider K., Babst M. & Hennecke H. GroEL chaperonins are required for the formation of a functional nitrogenase in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Arch microbiol 171, 279–289 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  28. Govezensky D., Greener T., Segal G. & Zamir A. Involvement of GroEL in nif gene regulation and nitrogenase assembly. J bacteriol 173, 6339–6346 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gabriella Pessi et al. Genome-Wide Transcript Analysis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Bacteroids in Soybean Root Nodules. Mol Plant Microbe In 20, 1353–1363 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Taylor L. P. & Grotewold E. Flavonoids as developmental regulators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8, 317–323 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Subramanian S., Stacey G. & Yu O. Endogenous isoflavones are essential for the establishment of symbiosis between soybean and Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Plant J 48, 261–273 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dong L., Yuan Q. & Yuan H. Changes of chemical properties of humic acids from crude and fungal transformed lignite. Fuel 85, 2402–2407 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  33. Tian C. F. et al. Comparative genomics of rhizobia nodulating soybean suggests extensive recruitment of lineage-specific genes in adaptations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 8629–8634 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li Y. et al. High-resolution transcriptomic analyses of Sinorhizobium sp. NGR234 bacteroids in determinate nodules of Vigna unguiculata and indeterminate nodules of Leucaena leucocephala. PloS one 8, 1–12 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Norio Suganuma et al. Bacteroids Isolated from Ineffective Nodules of Pisum sativum Mutant E135 (syml3) Lack Nitrogenase Activity but Contain the Two Protein Components of Nitrogenase. Plant Cell Physiol 39, 1093–1098 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  36. Lu X. Q., Hanna J. V. & Johnson W. D. Source indicators of humic substances: an elemental composition, solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR and Py-GC/MS study. Appl Geochem 15, 1019–1033 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  37. Xiaoli C., Shimaoka T., Qiang G. & Youcai Z. Characterization of humic and fulvic acids extracted from landfill by elemental composition, 13C CP/MAS NMR and TMAH-Py-GC/MS. Waste manage 28, 896–903 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Loh J. & Stacey G. Nodulation Gene Regulation in Bradyrhizobium japonicum: a Unique Integration of Global Regulatory Circuits. Appl Environ Microb 69, 10–17 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang F. & Smith D. L. Preincubation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum with genistein accelerates nodule development of soybean at suboptimal root zone temperatures. Plant Physiol 108, 961–968 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hurkman W. J. & Tanaka C. K. Solubilization of plant membrane proteins for analysis by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Plant Physiol 81, 802–806 (1986). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Süß C. et al. Identification of genistein-inducible and type III-secreted proteins of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J biotechnol 126, 69–77 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Herbert B. Advances in protein solubilisation for two‐dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 20, 660–663 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Delmotte N. et al. An integrated proteomics and transcriptomics reference data set provides new insights into the Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroid metabolism in soybean root nodules. Proteomics 10, 1391–1400 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep10836-s1.pdf (92.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES