Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 May 18;5:10227. doi: 10.1038/srep10227

Serum IGFBP7 levels associate with insulin resistance and the risk of metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population

Yi Liu 1,*, Minliang Wu 2,*, Jie Ling 1, Libing Cai 3, Dandan Zhang 4, Harvest F Gu 5, Hao Wang 4, Yimin Zhu 1,a, Maode Lai 4,a
PMCID: PMC4650783  PMID: 25984973

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS), one of the major public health concerns, is regarded as the “common soil” of incidence of common chronic diseases and may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. The predominant underlying mechanism of MetS is insulin resistance (IR). Additionally, previous studies have indicated that IGFBP7 has high affinity of binding with insulin and might induce IR. The objective of this study was to firstly evaluate the associations of serum IGFBP7 levels with IR and MetS with a relatively large sample and population based design. In a population based MetS case-control study, HOMA-IR was used to evaluate the insulin sensitivity and serum IGFBP7 levels were determined with chemiluminescence–linked immunoassay. As a result, the subjects of MetS and IR had higher serum levels of IGFBP7 than control healthy subjects. High serum IGFBP7 levels increased the risk of MetS and IR. Serum IGFBP7 levels were also found to be significantly correlated with metabolic-associated parameters of Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), HDL and LDL. These findings suggest that serum IGFBP7 levels are associated with IR and MetS, providing new insight into the mechanism of IR and Mets. IGFBP7 may be a potential interventional target for IR and Mets.


Metabolic syndrome (MetS), which characterized as obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia1,2,3, is regarded as the “common soil” of incidence of common chronic diseases and may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke and some cancers such as colorectal, breast, pancreas, and kidney4,5,6. The prevalence of MetS is about 30% and varies with the definitions of MetS and populations1,7,8. In recent twenty years, the prevalence of MetS is increasing worldwide. Therefore, MetS and its associated chronic diseases have been one of the major public health concerns.

The predominant underlying mechanism of MetS is insulin resistance (IR)9. IR is defined as a reduced responsiveness of a target cell or a whole organism to the insulin concentration to which it is exposed9. Less efficiency to metabolism and utilization of glucose induce hyperglycemia. Since serum glucose positively regulates insulin secretion, hyperglycemia stimulates islet β cell to secret insulin, then leads to hyperinsulinemia and increases the serum IGFs (insulin-like growth factors)10. Continuous status of hyperinsulinemia and increased serum IGFs initiate abnormal response in cell growth, development, differentiation and metabolism11,12,13. Previous studies had showed high serum IGF levels were associated with MetS, type 2 diabetes and common cancers11,12,13,14. Our findings had indicated that diabetes increased the risks of common cancers including colon and rectum, lung, pancreas, liver kidney and female breast15,16.

Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBPs) are a family of homogenous proteins and regulate the IGFs signaling pathway by binding with insulin and IGFs17,18. IGFBP 1-6 have higher ability of binding affinity to IGFs and less to insulin and play important roles on regulating cell growth via the IGFs signaling pathway19. However, different from the other six IGFBPs, the seventh of IGFBPs, IGFBP7, also known as IGFBP- rP1, MAC25, PSF, TAF, FSTL2 or PGI2-stimulating factor, has weak binding affinity to IGFs and relatively high affinity to insulin20,21. IGFBP7 is a 30-kDa modular secreted protein with a N-terminal domain, including 11 cysteines, a heparin binding site, a Kazal-type trypsin inhibitor domain and a C-terminal Ig-like type C repeat19,20,22, involved in multiple pathways mainly in an IGF- independent manner. Previous studies indicated that IGFBP7 expression was associated with tumor development and functions as tumor suppressor gene in cancers such as colon and rectum, breast, thyroid through the regulation of cell proliferation, cell adhesion, apoptosis, cellular senescence and angiogenesis23,24,25,26. IGFBP7 is also involved in TGFβ signal pathway. However, in glioma, IGFBP7 may play as an oncogenic role27. These studies suggested that IGFBP7 may play different roles in different cancers.

Due to the high affinity to insulin, IGFBP7 may interfere with biological response of insulin, subsequently induces IR and involves in the development of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Lopez-Bermejo et al. found increased serum IGFBP7 levels to be associated with IR21. Kutsukake et al. observed hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes had higher serum IGFBP7 levels than the hemodialysis patients without type 2 diabetes28. Recently, Gu, et al. found newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes had higher levels of IGFBP7 DNA methylation and low IGFBP7 may be associated with IR in type 2 diabetes29. The findings from these studies indicated serum IGFBP7 might be associated with IR and diabetes.

However, the sample sizes in those studies were relatively small and subjects restricted on diabetes patients. No previous study was found on the association of IGFBP7 with prediabetes such as MetS. So far, no convincing evidence was found. In our study, we had determined serum IGFBP7 levels of 1042 MetS patients and 1583 healthy control subjects from a cross-sectional survey on MetS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the associations of serum IGFBP7 with MetS and IR.

Methods

Subjects

A total of 2625 subjects including 1042 MetS patients and 1583 healthy control subjects of Chinese origin were recruited from XiaoShan cross-sectional survey on MetS in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China in 2010. This community-based cluster sampling survey consisted of a questionnaire based epidemiological interview, a health examination and laboratory measurements. All the subjects of this investigation were Han's Chinese and aged 21 to 75 years old. The case subjects in this study were MetS patients who were diagnosed according to the criteria of Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS). The MetS criteria of CDS includes: when a subject met three or more of the following four components17: 1) obesity: Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2; 2) fasting blood glucose (FG) ≥ 6.1 mmol/L or receiving antidiabetic medication; 3) fasting total triglyceride (TG) ≥ 1.7 mmol/L or males’ high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) < 0.9 mmol/L or females’ HDL < 1.0 mmol/L; and 4) blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mmHg or receiving antihypertensive medication. Healthy control subjects were unrelated individual residents and selected from the subjects with no history of obesity, hyperglycemia, dyslipidaemia, hypertension or diabetes mellitus. Participants who had cancer, chronic diseases of the heart, liver, lung or kidney, and other endocrine diseases were excluded. All participants were given and signed the written informed consent form.

Anthropometric measurements

Anthropometric indices, including weight, height, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC) and BP were measured by well-trained investigators, following standard protocols. Height and weight were measured with the participants wearing light clothing and without shoes. WC was measured at the midpoint between the iliac crest and lowest rib. HC was measured at the widest part of the gluteal region with two feet together. BP was measured in a sitting position with a mercury sphygmomanometer after 15 minutes of rest. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were reported as the average of three repeat measurements with 30-second rest intervals between measurements. BMI was calculated as the individual's body weight in kilograms divided by the square of his or her height in meters. Waist to height ratio (WHtR) was calculated as WC in centimeters divided by height in centimeters. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated as HC in centimeters divided by height in centimeters.

Biochemical measurements

After a 12-hour overnight fast, blood samples were drawn to determine the serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), TG, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), HDL, insulin and FG with a biochemical auto-analyzer (Hitachi 7060, Tokyo, Japan).

Serum IGFBP7 levels were measured by chemiluminescence–linked immunoassay, which incorporated a polyclonal and a monoclonal anti-IGFBP7 antibody (R&D Systems Inc., Abingdon, UK). The decisive coefficient (R2) of the standard curve was 0.9986. The average recovery rate was approximately 106.5%. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.32 ng/L.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) for normal distributions, as medians (inter-quartile range) for non- normally distributed variables. Non-normally distributed variables were square-root transformed before analysis. Qualitative data were presented frequencies. Homeostasis model of assessment was used to assess insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) and calculated as: fasting serum glucose (mmol/L) × fasting serum insulin (μU/ml)/22.5. Subjects were categorized into IR and insulin sensitive (IS) with the value of the 75th percentage of HOMA-IR index in control subjects as the cut off value.

The t-test was used to compare the mean differences between two groups for normally distributed variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed variables. The Chi-square test was used to compare the frequencies of differences for categorical variables. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confident interval (95% CI) was calculated with logistic model adjusted by potential confounding factors such as age, gender and IR . Correlations between continuous variables were assessed by the spearman partial correlation coefficient (rs).

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of School of Public Health, Zhejiang University and methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Results

The basic characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. The age (mean ± standard deviation) was 58.1 ± 9.3 years in case subjects and 52.5 ± 10.8 years in healthy controls (P < 0.001). 50.10% of subjects were males in MetS subjects and 47.80% in controls (P = 0.231). Therefore, the following analyses were carried out with adjustment of age and sex. MetS subjects had higher levels of BMI, WC, WHtR, HC, WHR, SBP, DBP, TC, TG, LDL, FG and fasting insulin than controls (all P < 0.001), and lower level of HDL (P < 0.001).

Table 1. Basic characteristics of MetS and control subjects.

Variable Case (n = 1042) Control (n = 1583) P-value
Age (year) 58.1 ± 9.3 52.5 ± 10.8 <0.001§
Gender (n, %)     0.231#
 Male 522 (50.10%) 756 (47.80%)  
 Female 519 (49.90%) 827 (52.20%)  
BMI (kg/m2) 27.21 ± 2.63 22.31 ± 2.50 <0.001§
WC (cm) 90.35 ± 7.92 78.20 ± 7.88 <0.001§
WHtR 0.56 ± 0.05 0.49 ± 0.05 <0.001§
HC (cm) 99.96 ± 5.83 92.15 ± 5.50 <0.001§
WHR 0.91 ± 0.06 0.85 ± 0.06 <0.001§
SBP (mmHg) 156.61 ± 16.52 125.64 ± 16.67 <0.001§
DBP (mmHg) 92.10 ± 10.08 75.71 ± 10.59 <0.001§
TC (mmol/L) 5.02 ± 0.92 4.39 ± 0.81 <0.001§
TG (mmol/L) 2.48 (1.99, 3.41) 1.23 (0.93, 1.52) <0.001*
HDL (mmol/L) 1.38 (1.18, 1.62) 1.63 (1.39, 1.96) <0.001*
LDL (mmol/L) 2.22 ± 0.75 1.81 ± 0.56 <0.001§
FG (mmol/L) 5.70 (5.04, 6.68) 4.89 (4.59, 5.24) <0.001*
Insulin (μU/ml) 5.63 (3.98, 7.51) 3.19 (2.32, 4.39) <0.001*
HOMA-IR index 1.46 (1.01, 2.00) 0.70 (0.50, 0.98) <0.001*

Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for age, BMI, WC, WHtR, HC, WHR, SBP, DBP,TC and LDL, and median (P25, P75) for TG, HDL, FG, insulin, HOMA-IR.

BMI = weight/height2, WHtR = WC/height, WHR = WC/HC, FG = fasting blood glucose HOMA-IR index = insulin × FG/22.5

§independent t-test.

#χ2 test.

*rank sum test.

The distributions of serum IGFBP7 levels of the subjects by MetS and IR status are presented in Table 2. The median of serum IGFBP7 level in MetS patients was 45.80 ng/ml, which was significantly higher than that in healthy controls (35.80 ng/ml) (P < 0.001). Serum IGFBP7 levels were categorized into two groups (high and low groups) with the value of the 50th percentage in control subjects (35.80 ng/ml) as the cut off value. High serum IGFBP7 levels (≥35.80 ng/ml) were associated with a significantly increased risk of MetS with the adjusted OR of 2.758 (95% CI = 2.308 – 3.297) (Table 3). After additional adjustment with BMI, association of IGFBP7 with MetS remained significant with the OR of 3.993 (3.037, 5.250).

Table 2. Serum IGFBP7 levels in the subjects by MetS and IR status.

Group N Median P25 P75 P-value#
MetS
 Control 1575 35.80 28.70 46.40 <0.001
 Case 1040 45.80 36.50 59.05  
           
HOMA-IR index§
 <0.98 1420 38.25 30.30 50.53 <0.001
 ≥0.98 1192 40.45 31.83 52.45  

#P values calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test.

§categorized by the value of 75th percentage in control group.

Table 3. Associations of serum IGFBP7 levels with MetS and IR.

graphic file with name srep10227-t3.jpg

IR status was evaluated with HOMA-IR index and categorized into IR and IS with the value of the 75th percentage of HOMA-IR index in control subjects (0.98) as the cut off value. The median of serum IGFBP7 levels in IR subjects was 40.45 ng/ml, which was significantly higher than that in control subjects (38.25 ng/ml) (P < 0.001) (Table 2). High serum IGFBP7 levels (≥35.80 ng/ml) were associated with a significantly increased risk of IR (OR = 1.240, 95% CI = 1.055 − 1.458) (Table 3). However, the significance with IR was not found after additional adjustment with BMI.

In order to analyze the relationship among these three things (IGBP7, MetS case/ control status, and IR), we calculated the association of IGFBP7 with MetS modified by HOMA-IR, age, sex, the significance between IGFBP7 and MetS still remained with the OR of 3.497 (95%CI: 2.796-4.375).

Table 4 shows the correlations of serum IGFBP7 levels and metabolic related components. In healthy control subjects, after adjusted by sex and age, serum IGFBP7 levels were found to be negatively correlated with WC (rs = −0.138, P < 0.001), WHtR (rs = −0.151, P < 0.001), WHR (rs  = −0.137, P < 0.001), SBP (rs = −0.086, P = 0.001), DBP (rs = −0.071, P = 0.005), HDL (rs = −0.121, P < 0.001), and positively with LDL (rs =0.164, P < 0.001). After additional adjustment with HOMA-IR, serum IGFBP7 levels still negatively correlated with WC (rs = −0.103, P < 0.001), WHtR (rs = −0.117, P < 0.001), WHR (rs = −0.109, P < 0.001), SBP (rs = −0.060, P = 0.017), DBP (rs = −0.051, P = 0.043), HDL (rs = −0.114, P < 0.001), and positively with LDL (rs = 0.157, P < 0.001). In MetS subjects the negative correlations were observed between serum IGFBP7 level with WHR (rs = −0.080, P = 0.012) and HDL (rs = −0.116, P < 0.001), and the positive correlation between serum IGFBP7 level with LDL (rs = 0.157, P < 0.001) adjusted by sex and age and WHR ( rs = −0.072, P = 0.023), HDL ( rs = −0.117, P < 0.001) and LDL( rs = 0.156, P < 0.001) adjusted by age, sex and HOMA-IR.

Table 4. Correlations between serum IGFBP7 levels and metabolic-associated parameters.

  Control
Case
  rs§ P§ rs* P* rs§ P§ rs* P*
WC (cm) −0.138 <0.001 −0.103 <0.001 −0.056 0.078 −0.041 >0.10
WHtR −0.151 <0.001 −0.117 <0.001 −0.074 >0.10 −0.059 0.064
HC (cm) −0.079 0.002 −0.047 0.067 −0.003 >0.10 0.011 >0.10
WHR −0.137 <0.001 −0.109 <0.001 −0.080 0.012 −0.072 0.023
BMI (kg/m2) −0.085 0.001 −0.041 >0.10 −0.013 >0.10 0.005 >0.10
SBP (mmHg) −0.086 0.001 −0.060 0.017 0.050 0.108 0.055 0.080
DBP (mmHg) −0.071 0.005 −0.051 0.043 0.040 >0.10 0.041 >0.10
TC (mmol/L) 0.011 >0.10 0.024 >0.10 0.050 0.109 0.055 0.078
TG (mmol/L)# −0.063 0.013 −0.032 >0.10 0.009 >0.10 0.018 >0.10
HDL (mmol/L)# −0.121 <0.001 −0.114 <0.001 −0.116 <0.001 −0.117 <0.001
LDL (mmol/L) 0.164 <0.001 0.157 <0.001 0.157 <0.001 0.156 <0.001
FG(mmol/L)# −0.065 0.010 −0.009 >0.10 −0.013 >0.10 0.017 >0.10
Insulin (μU/ml)## −0.127 <0.001 0.009 >0.10 −0.064 0.040 −0.017 >0.10
HOMA−IR# −0.132 <0.001     −0.063 0.044    

§Spearman correlation adjusted by sex and age.

*Spearman correlation adjusted by sex, age and HOMA-IR.

Discussion

In present study, we determined serum IGFBP7 levels in 1042 MetS patients and 1583 healthy control subjects and found that the subjects with MetS and IR had higher levels of serum IGFBP7 than controls. Higher IGFBP7 increased the risk of MetS and IR. Serum IGFBP7 levels were also associated with some metabolic-associated parameters. The findings indicated that increased serum IGFBP7 levels might be one of the mechanisms of IR and MetS.

IGFBP7, also known as IGFBP-related protein 1, is a secreted glycoprotein and widely expressed in various human tissues20, including gastrointestinal tract, brain, lung and prostate. IGFBP7 has been reported to be associated with tumor development and survival although the results were not always consistent30,31,32. DNA methylation was regarded as the main mechanism in abnormal expression of IGFBP725. In 2010, Huang et al.33 found the SNPs in the promoter-regulatory region might affect the gene expression level and modify the cancer susceptibility.

There were some previous researches intended to examine association of IGFBP7 with IR and diabetes, however the findings were not consistence. In 2004, positive correlation were found between serum IGFBP7 levels and fasting glucose34; In 2006, Lopez-Bermejo et al.21 firstly found that higher serum levels of circulating IGFBP7 decreased insulin sensitivity and adiponectin as well as increased C-reactive protein and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. These findings implicated that IGFBP7 might associate with IR. However, the sample in his study was relatively small (113 nondiabetic men and 43 type 2 diabetic men) and this result was not reported to be validated in the latter study. The difference might be due to selection criteria of type 2 diabetes patients and sample size. With large sample size and the samples of MetS from a cross-sectional study, we used MetS (diagnosed based on the criteria of CDS) and IR (determined as HOMA-IR), which are the prediabetes status, as the outcome of analysis. We found the subjects with MetS and IR (determined as HOMA-IR) had higher levels of serum IGFBP7. Higher serum levels of IGFBP7 increased the risks of IR and MetS.

Unlike IGFBPs 1–6, IGFBP7 has a relatively low affinity for IGF, while its affinity for insulin is 500-fold higher19,20. With insulin receptor binding assays, Yamanaka et al. found IGFBP7 inhibited the specific binding of 125I-insulin to human placental insulin receptors at 60% by 100 pmol, and 90% by 300 pmol19. This finding indicated IGFBP7 could compete with insulin receptors for binding of insulin and reflected higher affinity of IGFBP7 for insulin. IGFBP7 might also take effect by involving in insulin receptor autophosphorylation and IRS-1 phosphorylation19. From molecular structural feature perspective18,19, the insulin binding site is at the NH2 terminus of the IGFBP molecule, and disulfide bonds between the NH2 and COOH termini result in a ternary structure for the IGFBPs that confers high affinity for IGFs. IGFBPs 1-6 had the conserved NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal sequences and the appropriate ternary structures formed by disulfide bonds, resulting in high affinity for IGFs but low affinity for insulin. Compared with IGFBPs 1-6, IGFBP7 lacked the ternary structure, and its insulin binding site at the NH2 terminus was exposed, contributed to increased affinity for insulin and diminished affinity for IGFs.

All previous observations indicated that increased IGFBP7 might bind serum insulin and substantially reduced serum level of free insulin35, competitively inhibit the binding of insulin and IR, diminish or eliminate biological effects of insulin, and then resulting in IR. From population level, our findings supported this hypothesis.

So far, there was no report about the direct relationship between IGFBP7 and MetS. MetS is represented by a group of interrelated disorders, including central obesity, hypertension, derangement of glucose and lipid metabolism. Our results also indicated that IGFBP7 significantly associated with MetS after adjustment with age, sex (or IR). It also correlated with metabolic related components (BMI, WC, WHtR, WHR) irrespectively of adjustment of HOMA-IR. Together with these evidences, these findings indicated that IGFBP7 was an independent predictor for MetS and its effect on IR might be mediated by obesity. These findings indicated IGFBP7 might interfere the metabolism serum lipids and energy. Bonnet reported that postnatal overgrowth might be related to a dosage effect of the IGFBP7 gene36. Further, interactions of IGFBP7 with the IGF system possibly resulted in hyperinsulinemia21,37. More importantly, IR may lie at the heart of the MetS38, differentially contributing to MetS phenotype39.

Serum IGFBP7 was also associated with the other metabolic components. The associations of serum IGFBP7 were firstly documented with WHR, HDL and LDL both in the subjects of Mets and control and adjusted by sex, gender or additional HOMA-IR. We also found significant associations with WC, WHtR, SBP, DBP in control subjects. BMI and DBP had been found to be significant in previous study28,40. These associations have been modified potential confounders such as age, gender or additional HOMA-IR. Although the mechanisms of these associations remain uncover, these findings indicate IGFBP7 might associated the multiple biological effects and it may be an interventional target for multiple metabolic alterations. Based our previous studies, we have found several small molecular disruptors could reduce the capability of combination of IGFBP7 with insulin and then lessen IR status (unpublished data). These findings might provide a new strategy for blocking the progression of Mets and diabetes and improving metabolic condition.

After adjustment of age, sex and HOMA-IR, IGFBP7 also associated with MetS. This result indicated that IGFBP7 might be an independent predictor for MS. Together with the evidences with the associations of IGFBP7 with metabolic components, These findings indicated that IGFBP7 independently associated with MetS and its biological effects might be mediated by obesity, LDL and HDL etc.

In summary, we found that serum IGFBP7 levels are associated with IR and MetS and indicated that increased serum IGFBP7 might be one of circulating mechanism of MetS. IGFBP7 might be a new interventional target for IR and Mets.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Liu, Y. et al. Serum IGFBP7 levels associate with insulin resistance and the risk of metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population. Sci. Rep. 5, 10227; doi: 10.1038/srep10227 (2015).

Acknowledgments

Funding: This study has been supported by the China National Key Technology R&D Program (2012BAI02B03), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81172755), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Program for Zhejiang Leading Team of Science and Technology Innovation (2010R50050), and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents.

Footnotes

Author Contributions M.L. and Y.Z. conceived and designed the project. M.W. and Y.L. performed laboratorial determination. J.L., H.W., L.C. and D.Z. participated in the epidemiological investigation. Y.L. and J.L. carried out data analysis and Y.Z., Y.L. drafted the manuscript. H.G. and M.L. discussed and refined the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the paper for submission.

References

  1. Alberti K. G., Zimmet P., Shaw J. & Group I. D. F. E. T. F. C. The metabolic syndrome–a new worldwide definition. Lancet 366, 1059–1062, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cameron A. J., Zimmet P. Z., Shaw J. E. & Alberti K. G. The metabolic syndrome: in need of a global mission statement. Diabet Med. 26, 306–309, doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02681.x (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Simmons R. K. et al. The metabolic syndrome: useful concept or clinical tool? Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Diabetologia 53, 600–605, doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1620-4 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunt K. J., Williams K., Hazuda H. P., Stern M. P. & Haffner S. M. The metabolic syndrome and the impact of diabetes on coronary heart disease mortality in women and men: the San Antonio Heart Study. Ann. Epidemiol. 17, 870–877, doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.05.012 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Klein B. E., Klein R. & Lee K. E. Components of the metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Beaver Dam. Diabetes Care 25, 1790–1794 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Malik S. et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation 110, 1245–1250, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140677.20606.0E (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Alberti K. G. et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120, 1640–1645, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zimmet P., Alberti K. G. & Serrano Rios M. A New International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome: the Rationale and the Results. Rev. Esp. Cardiol (Engl Ed) 58, 1371–1375, doi: 10.1016/S1885-5857(06)60742-1 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lebovitz H.E. Insulin resistance: definition and consequences. Exp. Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 109 Suppl 2 S135–48, doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18576 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sandhu M. S., Dunger D. B. & Giovannucci E. L. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF binding proteins, their biologic interactions, and colorectal cancer. J Natl. Cancer Inst. 94, 972–980 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dunger D. B., Ong K. K. & Sandhu M. S. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels and potential risk of type 2 diabetes. Horm Res 60 Suppl 3 131–135, doi:74514 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaushal K. et al. The impact of abnormalities in IGF and inflammatory systems on the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 27, 2682–2688 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sandhu M. S., Gibson J. M., Heald A. H., Dunger D. B. & Wareham N. J. Association between insulin-like growth factor-I: insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 ratio and metabolic and anthropometric factors in men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 13, 166–170 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu X. et al. Serum levels of insulin growth factor (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein predict risk of second primary tumors in patients with head and neck cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 10, 3988–3995, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0762 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang P. H. et al. Increased risk of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMC Public Health 12, 567, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-567 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ren X. et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer: evidence from an international ecological study and population-based risk analysis in China. Public Health 123, 540–544, doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.06.019 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Baxter R. C. et al. Recommendations for nomenclature of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) superfamily. Growth Horm IGF Res 8, 273–274 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hwa V., Oh Y. & Rosenfeld R. G. The insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) superfamily. Endocrine reviews 20, 761–787, doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.6.0382 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamanaka Y., Wilson E. M., Rosenfeld R. G. & Oh Y. Inhibition of insulin receptor activation by insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. J Biol Chem 272, 30729–30734 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Oh Y. et al. Synthesis and characterization of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-7. Recombinant human mac25 protein specifically binds IGF-I and -II. The Journal of biological chemistry 271, 30322–30325 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lopez-Bermejo A. et al. Insulin resistance is associated with increased serum concentration of IGF-binding protein-related protein 1 (IGFBP-rP1/MAC25). Diabetes 55, 2333–2339, doi: 10.2337/db05-1627 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Collet C. & Candy J. How many insulin-like growth factor binding proteins? Molecular and cellular endocrinology 139, 1–6 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma Y. et al. Tumor suppressor gene insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein 1 (IGFBP-rP1) induces senescence-like growth arrest in colorectal cancer cells. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 85, 141–145, doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.04.005 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ruan W. et al. IGFBP7 plays a potential tumor suppressor role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer Biol. Ther. 6, 354–359 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruan W. J. et al. IGFBP7 plays a potential tumor suppressor role against colorectal carcinogenesis with its expression associated with DNA hypomethylation of exon 1. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 7, 929–932, doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0929 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vizioli M. G. et al. IGFBP7: an oncosuppressor gene in thyroid carcinogenesis. Oncogene 29, 3835–3844, doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.136 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang W., Xiang C., Cazacu S., Brodie C. & Mikkelsen T. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 mediates glioma cell growth and migration. Neoplasia 10, 1335–1342 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kutsukake M. et al. Circulating IGF-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) levels are elevated in patients with endometriosis or undergoing diabetic hemodialysis. Reprod Biol. Endocrinol 6, 54, doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-6-54 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gu H. F. et al. Evaluation of IGFBP-7 DNA methylation changes and serum protein variation in Swedish subjects with and without type 2 diabetes. Clinical epigenetics 5, doi:Artn 20 Doi 10.1186/1868-7083-5-20 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Li F. et al. Methylation of serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 promoter in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes, chromosomes & cancer 53, 90–97, doi: 10.1002/gcc.22120 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen D. et al. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 (IGFBP7): a promising gene therapeutic for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 21, 758–766, doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.282 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  32. An W. et al. Low expression of IGFBP7 is associated with poor outcome of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Annals of surgical oncology 19, 3971–3978, doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2407-2 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang Y. J. et al. The functional IGFBP7 promoter -418G>A polymorphism and risk of head and neck cancer. Mutat Res. 702, 32–39, doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.06.012 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shao L., Huang Q., Luo M. & Lai M. Detection of the differentially expressed gene IGF-binding protein-related protein-1 and analysis of its relationship to fasting glucose in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. Endocrine-related cancer 11, 141–148 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhan Y. et al. Serum insulin-like, growth factor binding protein-related protein 1 (IGFBP-rP1) and endometrial cancer risk in Chinese women. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 132, 411–416, doi: 10.1002/ijc.27622 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bonnet C. et al. Characterization of mosaic supernumerary ring chromosomes by array-CGH: segmental aneusomy for proximal 4q in a child with tall stature and obesity. American journal of medical genetics. Part A 140, 233–237, doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31075 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Crossey P. A., Jones J. S. & Miell J. P. Dysregulation of the insulin/IGF binding protein-1 axis in transgenic mice is associated with hyperinsulinemia and glucose intolerance. Diabetes 49, 457–465 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Grundy S. M. Hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome. The American journal of cardiology 83, 25f–29f (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Guo S. Insulin signaling, resistance, and the metabolic syndrome: insights from mouse models into disease mechanisms. The Journal of endocrinology 220, T1–t23, doi: 10.1530/joe-13-0327 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lopez-Bermejo A. et al. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein 1 (IGFBP-rP1/MAC25) is linked to endothelial-dependent vasodilation in high-ferritin type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 30, 1615–1617, doi: 10.2337/dc06-1905 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES