Skip to main content
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute logoLink to JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
. 2015 Mar 13;107(6):djv057. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv057

Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance Coverage Among Long-term Childhood Cancer Survivors

Anne C Kirchhoff 1,, Helen M Parsons 1, Karen A Kuhlthau 1, Wendy Leisenring 1, Karen Donelan 1, Echo L Warner 1, Gregory T Armstrong 1, Leslie L Robison 1, Kevin C Oeffinger 1, Elyse R Park 1
PMCID: PMC4650970  PMID: 25770148

Abstract

Supplemental security income (SSI) and social security disability insurance (DI) are federal programs that provide disability benefits. We report on SSI/DI enrollment in a random sample of adult, long-term survivors of childhood cancer (n = 698) vs a comparison group without cancer (n = 210) from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who completed a health insurance survey. A total of 13.5% and 10.0% of survivors had ever been enrolled on SSI or DI, respectively, compared with 2.6% and 5.4% of the comparison group. Cranial radiation doses of 25 Gy or more were associated with a higher risk of current SSI (relative risk [RR] = 3.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.05 to 7.56) and DI (RR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.65 to 8.06) enrollment. Survivors with severe/life-threatening conditions were more often enrolled on SSI (RR = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.04 to 6.96) and DI (RR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.45 to 5.14) compared with those with mild/moderate or no health conditions. Further research is needed on disability-related financial challenges after childhood cancer.


Five-year survival from a diagnosis of childhood cancer is over 80% (1). Treatments including surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy place some patients at risk for medical late-effects (2,3), which include severe and life-threatening complications (eg, second cancers, cardiac failure) (2,4,5). These health problems can affect adult survivors’ ability to work (6). With more than 420 000 US childhood cancer survivors (5), understanding their health and financial needs is critical, given their need for continued medical care.

In the United States, two federal disability programs, supplemental security income (SSI) and social security disability insurance (DI), provide income and insurance support for disabled adults. SSI is a “means-tested” program for those with limited income who are disabled, blind, or age 65 years and older and is not based on prior work history. DI pays benefits to adults ages 18 years and older who have worked and paid social security taxes. To qualify for either program, an individual must be unable to engage in “substantial gainful activity,” meaning they have an impairment lasting for a continuous period of 12 months or more or that is expected to result in death. Enrollment in either of these programs indicates substantial long-term health problems. We examine SSI and DI enrollment in a sample of adult, long-term survivors of childhood cancer and a comparison group from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

The CCSS is a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort developed to investigate health outcomes in childhood cancer survivors diagnosed younger than 21 years of age between 1970 and 1986 (7,8). All study participants provided informed consent. We utilized survey data gathered from 698 survivors and 210 comparison group participants (participation rate: survivors = 70%, comparison group = 65%). Clinical characteristics were abstracted from medical records while acute/chronic health conditions were self-reported from the 2007 to 2010 CCSS follow-up survey (2,3,8). Participants reported whether they were currently or formerly enrolled on SSI/DI. We used 2012 Social Security Administration annual report data to estimate current SSI/DI enrollment for the US population ages 18 to 64 years (9,10).

As the sample was randomly selected from age strata based on the 2007 to 2010 survey (22–29 years, 30–39 years, ≥40 years), analyses were weighted based on the distribution of age in the CCSS cohort. We compared survivors’ SSI/DI enrollment to current national US estimates and calculated proportions of survivors and the comparison group who were currently/formerly enrolled in SSI/DI. Multivariable generalized linear models assessed differences between survivors and the comparison group, and by survivors’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. We ran separate models evaluating severe/life-threatening health conditions compared with mild/moderate or no health conditions among survivors. P values are two-sided and statistically significant at α = 0.05. Procedures were institutional review board approved.

Survivors were currently enrolled on SSI (7.3% vs US = 2.5%, P < .001) and DI (6.4% vs US = 4.8%, P = .04) more frequently than the US population. Differences between weighted percentages were analyzed using Pearson chi square test. In Table 1, 7.3% of survivors were currently enrolled on SSI vs 1.2% of the comparison group (P = .003); 13.5% of survivors vs 2.6% of the comparison group were ever enrolled on SSI (P < .001). Current enrollment on DI was reported by 6.4% of survivors and 4.3% of the comparison group (P = .32); ever enrolled on DI was reported by 10.0% of survivors and 5.4% of the comparison group (P = .05). Multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, and race demonstrated a higher risk of ever enrolled on SSI for survivors vs the comparison group (relative risk [RR] = 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.98 to 12.80, P = .001), but not for DI (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 0.90 to 3.44, P = .10; data not shown).

Table 1.

Demographic and insurance characteristics for adult, long-term survivors of childhood cancer and comparison group weighted to reflect the age distribution of the full CCSS cohort

Characteristics Survivors (n = 698) Comparison group (n = 210) P
No. Unweighted % Weighted % No. Unweighted % Weighted %
Age at survey, y
 22–29 214 30.7 11.3 61 29.1 13.5 .06
 30–39 228 32.7 42.3 68 32.4 33.6
 40–62 256 36.7 46.4 81 38.6 53.0
Sex
 Male 314 45.0 45.5 82 39.1 38.9 .11
 Female 384 55.0 54.5 128 60.9 61.1
Race*
 White 646 92.8 93.6 185 92.5 93.5 .96
 Black 14 2.0 1.7 4 2.0 1.9
 Hispanic/Latino 24 3.5 3.0 6 3.0 2.4
 Other 12 1.7 1.8 5 2.5 2.2
Household income*
 Less than $20 000 91 13.5 12.0 12 6.0 5.2 .02
 $20 000 - $39 999 106 15.8 14.9 24 11.9 10.7
 $40 000 - $59 999 104 15.5 15.8 35 17.4 16.9
 $60 000 - $79 999 95 14.1 14.8 32 15.9 16.1
 Over $80 000 240 35.7 38.4 90 44.8 48.7
 Don’t know 36 5.4 4.2 8 4.0 2.4
Insurance*
 Employer-sponsored health insurance 464 67.1 70.1 161 78.2 81.8 .001
 Individual 46 6.7 6.4 17 8.3 7.2
 Medicare 20 2.9 2.5 0 0 0
 Medicaid/state 81 11.7 10.2 7 3.4 3.0
 Uninsured or don’t know 80 11.6 10.4 21 10.2 8.0
Chronic condition‡
 None 111 15.9 15.1 68 32.4 32.3 <.001
 Mild-moderate 319 45.7 45.2 114 54.3 52.0
 Severe-life threatening 268 38.4 39.7 28 13.3 15.7
Cancer diagnosis
 Leukemia 255 36.5 35.0
 Central nervous system 104 14.9 14.9
 Wilms (kidney) tumor 66 9.5 8.1
 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma 39 5.6 6.7
 Bone 45 6.5 8.1
 Hodgkin’s Lymphoma 71 10.2 12.9
 Neuroblastoma 67 9.6 6.1
 Soft tissue sarcoma 51 7.3 8.3
Age at diagnosis, y
 0–4 365 52.3 39.2
 5–10 143 20.5 26.3
 11–15 109 15.6 19.8
 16–20 81 11.6 14.7
Second cancer
 No 668 95.7 94.9
 Yes 30 4.3 5.1
Recurrence of primary malignancy
 No 611 87.5 88.1
 Yes 87 12.5 11.9
Cranial radiation*
 None (ref.) 269 41.6 36.6
 Scatter low/high§ 172 26.6 29.8
 ≤18 Gy 71 11.0 11.1
 19–24 Gy 50 7.7 8.8
 ≥25 Gy 85 13.1 13.8
Supplemental security income*
 Ever enrolled 100 14.9 13.5 5 2.5 2.6 <.001||
  Currently enrolled 59 8.8 7.3 2 1.5 1.2 .003¶
 Never enrolled 570 85.1 86.2 199 97.6 97.4
Social security disability insurance*
 Ever enrolled 68 10.3 10.0 10 4.8 5.4 .05||
  Currently enrolled 47 7.1 6.4 7 3.4 4.3 .32¶
 Never enrolled 595 89.7 89.6 197 95.2 94.6

* Totals do not include participants who did not report on the indicated characteristic. CCSS = Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

P values are two-sided and compare weighted percentages using Pearson chi square test.

‡ Classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

§ Scatter low (no treatment to head/brain, but patient received radiation to some part of the body [>0 to <1 Gy])/scatter high (no direct treatment to head/brain segment, but treatment was nearby [dose range ≥1 to ≤5 Gy]).

|| Ever enrolled includes report of current or former social security income (SSI) and disability insurance (DI) enrollment; P value compares percentage ever enrolled between survivors and the comparison group.

¶ Compares percentage current SSI and DI between survivors and the comparison group.

Among survivors (Table 2), SSI was associated with female sex (RR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.00 to 3.06, P = .05), age four years or younger at diagnosis (RR = 7.56, 95% CI = 1.02 to 56.16, P = .05), and cranial radiation doses of 25 Gy or more (RR = 3.93, 95% CI = 2.05 to 7.56, P < .001). P values in Table 2 were calculated using the Wald test. For DI coverage, second malignancy (RR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.53 to 7.33, P = .003) and cranial radiation doses of more than 18 Gy (19–24 Gy RR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.08 to 7.33, P = .03; ≥25 Gy RR = 3.65, 95% CI = 1.65 to 8.06, P < .001) were statistically significant. In a separate analysis (data not shown), survivors with severe or life-threatening conditions were currently enrolled on SSI more often (RR = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.04 to 6.96, P < .001) and DI more often (RR = 2.73, 95% CI = 1.45 to 5.14, P = .02) compared with survivors with mild/moderate or no health conditions.

Table 2.

Multivariable clinical factors associated with current SSI and DI coverage among adult, long-term survivors of childhood cancer

Clinical factors Current
supplemental security income*
Current
social security disability insurance*
Relative risk (95% CI) P Relative risk (95% CI) P
Sex
 Male (ref) 1 1
 Female 1.74 (1.00 to 3.06) .05 1.16 (0.64 to 2.08) .63
Years since diagnosis
 22–29 (ref) 1 1
 30–35 0.66 (0.26 to 1.71) .40 1.21 (0.48 to 3.04) .69
 ≥35 0.95 (0.39 to 2.30) .91 1.32 (0.50 to 3.51) .60
Age at diagnosis, y
 16–20 (ref) 1 1
 11–15 4.89 (0.66 to 36.51) .12 1.55 (0.32 to 7.56) .59
 5–10 4.88 (0.63 to 37.89) .13 1.78 (0.35 to 9.01) .48
 0–4 7.56 (1.02 to 56.16) .05 2.20 (0.42 to 11.43) .35
Recurrence
 No (ref) 1 1
 Yes 0.99 (0.45 to 2.18) .97 1.48 (0.71 to 3.06) .29
Second cancer
 No (ref) 1 1
 Yes 1.66 (0.59 to 4.65) .33 3.35 (1.53 to 7.33) .003
Cranial Radiation
 None (ref) 1 1
 Scatter low/high† 0.63 (0.25 to 1.59) .33 0.78 (0.27 to 2.30) .66
 ≤18 Gy 0.84 (0.27 to 2.62) .76 1.24 (0.39 to 4.00) .71
 19–24 Gy 1.29 (0.41 to 4.07) .67 2.82 (1.08 to 7.33) .03
 ≥25 Gy 3.93 (2.05 to 7.56) <.001 3.65 (1.65 to 8.06) .001

* Models adjusted for current age. Race not included because of small sample size for certain groups. P values are two-sided and were estimated using a Wald test.

† Scatter low (no treatment to head/brain, but patient received radiation to some part of the body [>0 to <1 Gy])/scatter high (no direct treatment to head/brain segment, but treatment was nearby [dose range ≥1 to ≤5 Gy]).

Our findings demonstrate that adult, long-term survivors of childhood cancer receive SSI/DI benefits more than the comparison group and the US population. Although these benefit programs alleviate some financial burden for disabled adults, the maximum SSI benefit pay-out is $733.00 per month (ie, $8796/year) in 2015, which is lower than the Federal Poverty Level for a single adult ($11 770) (11). We found that survivors with greater cranial radiation doses, who were younger at diagnosis and had severe or life-threatening chronic conditions, were at a higher risk. Identifying or managing conditions among high-risk survivors before they impact employment can be challenging as neurocognitive or other health problems may not emerge before survivors are old enough to enter the workforce (12–15). Previous studies have indicated cognitive decline may increase as survivors age, meaning that employment problems could develop well after follow-up care ends (16).

Our study has limitations. The comparison group had few participants reporting SSI or DI enrollment, meaning that our conclusions are based on small numbers. Also, the comparison group was selected from siblings enrolled in the CCSS. Because of our study design, there were only 18 family pairs; thus, we were unable to account for childhood and genetic factors that may impact SSI/DI enrollment. Also, because marital status and income are intermediaries between survivor status and SSI/DI coverage, we did not adjust for these factors to show the direct relationship between cancer and SSI/DI. Thus, demographic factors that affect SSI/DI eligibility need further exploration. In addition, future studies should evaluate DI enrollment related to work history, as paying social security taxes is a requirement for eligibility. As social security applications increase during economic recessions, our assessment in 2011 and 2012 may be inflated.

Our findings add to the growing evidence that young cancer survivors not only bear a disproportionate burden of chronic health problems, but require a greater level of assistance to manage health complications (17–19). Adult, long-term survivors of childhood cancer are enrolled on SSI more often than US and noncancer comparisons. Further research is required to evaluate the effect of these benefits on the employment, financial status, and quality of life of childhood cancer survivors.

Funding

This work was supported by the Lance Armstrong Foundation and the National Cancer Institute (U24 CA 55727, Armstrong GT, principal investigator). Dr. Kirchhoff is supported by the Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Huntsman Cancer Foundation.

The study funders had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript, nor the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

  • 1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010. Accessed January 7, 2015.
  • 2. Armstrong GT, Kawashima T, Leisenring W, et al. Aging and Risk of Severe, Disabling, Life-Threatening, and Fatal Events in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(12):1218–1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. NEJM. 2006;355(15):1572–1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Armstrong GT, Oeffinger KC, Chen Y, et al. Modifiable Risk Factors and Major Cardiac Events Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(29):3673–3680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Robison LL, Hudson MM. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(1):61–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kirchhoff AC, Leisenring W, Krull KR, et al. Unemployment among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Med Care. 2010;48(11):1015–1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Leisenring WM, Mertens AC, Armstrong GT, et al. Pediatric Cancer Survivorship Research: Experience of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(14):2319–2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD, et al. Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Ped Oncol. 2002;38(4):229–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Social Security Administration. Annual Statistical Report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, 2013. http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/di_asr/. Accessed February 11, 2015.
  • 10. Social Security Administration. SSI Annual Statistical Report, 2013. http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/ssi_asr/2013/ssi_asr13.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2015.
  • 11. Social Security Administration. SSI Federal Payment Amounts for 2015, 2015. http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/SSI.html. Accessed February 11, 2015.
  • 12. Armstrong GT, Liu Q, Yasui Y, et al. Long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(13):946–958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ellenberg L, Liu Q, Gioia G, et al. Neurocognitive status in long-term survivors of childhood CNS malignancies: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(6):705–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kadan-Lottick NS, Zeltzer LK, Liu Q, et al. Neurocognitive functioning in adult survivors of childhood non-central nervous system cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(12):881–893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Krull KR, Brinkman TM, Li C, et al. Neurocognitive outcomes decades after treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the St Jude lifetime cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(35):4407–4415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Krull KR, Zhang N, Santucci A, et al. Long-term decline in intelligence among adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial radiation. Blood. 2013;122(4):550–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dowling E, Yabroff KR, Mariotto A, McNeel T, Zeruto C, Buckman D. Burden of illness in adult survivors of childhood cancers: findings from a population-based national sample. Cancer. 2010;116(15):3712–3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Smith AW, Parsons HM, Kent EE, et al. Unmet Support Service Needs and Health-Related Quality of Life among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: The AYA HOPE Study. Front Oncol. 2013;3:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Guy GP, Yabroff KR, Ekwueme DU, et al. Estimating the health and economic burden of cancer among those diagnosed as adolescents and young adults. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(6):1024–1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES