Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014 Oct;47(2):128–135. doi: 10.1007/s12016-013-8401-z

Epigenetic Alterations and MicroRNA Misexpression in Cancer and Autoimmune Diseases: a Critical Review

Yoshimasa Saito 1, Hidetsugu Saito 2, Gangning Liang 3, Jeffrey M Friedman 4
PMCID: PMC4651002  NIHMSID: NIHMS730725  PMID: 24362548

Abstract

Epigenetic markers such as DNA methylation and histone modifications around promoter regions modify chromatin structure and regulate expression of downstream genes. In fact, aberrant epigenetic modifications are common events in human disease including tumorigenesis and autoimmunity. Small non-coding RNAs named microRNAs (miRNAs) are modulators of gene expression and play critical roles in various cellular processes. Several miRNAs have been characterized as tumor suppressors or oncogenes in cancer, and recent reports implicate certain miRNAs in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Epigenetic investigations have shown that distinct miRNAs are directly regulated by DNA methylation and histone modifications at their promoters. Moreover, miRNAs themselves are key participants in regulating the chromatin modifying machinery. Chromatin-modifying drugs such as DNA methylation inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors have shown efficacy in human malignancies and there is some evidence that these drugs may be useful in autoimmune disease. The benefits of these drugs are at least partially mediated by restoring expression of epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes, including miRNAs. The complex layers regulating gene expression have yet to be fully elucidated, but it is clear that epigenetic alterations and miRNA misexpression are essential events in pathologic processes, especially cancer and autoimmune disease, and represent promising therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Cancer, Autoimmunity, Epigenetics, MicroRNA, Methylation

DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications

Epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation and histone modification are critical in chromatin remodeling and regulation of gene expression in mammalian development [1]. Aberrant DNA methylation is one of the most consistent epigenetic changes in human cancers [2]. DNA methylation patterns are generated and heritably maintained by three active DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B. The de novo methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B act independently of replication and show equal preference for both unmethylated and hemimethylated DNA, whereas the maintenance DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 acts during replication and preferentially methylates hemimethylated DNA [3]. DNA hypermethylation refers principally to the gain of methylation at specific sites that are unmethylated under normal conditions. This aberrant methylation occurs mainly in short CpG-rich DNA stretches called CpG islands. DNA methylation can lead to gene silencing by either preventing or promoting the recruitment of regulatory proteins to DNA. It can provide binding sites for methyl-binding domain proteins, which can mediate gene repression through interactions with histone deacetylases (HDACs). This phenomenon of aberrant promoter CpG island hypermethylation is associated with the stabilization of transcriptional repression and loss of gene function, and often occurs in tumor suppressor genes. In contrast, DNA hypomethylation is associated mainly with the loss of DNA methylation in genome-wide repeat regions. DNA hypomethylation has been reported in several tumor types, such as colorectal and gastric cancers, and occurs in many gene-poor genomic areas, including repetitive elements, retrotransposons, and introns, where it leads to genomic instability [4].

The N-terminal tails of histones can undergo a variety of posttranslational modifications including methylation and acetylation on specific residues. These histone modifications regulate transcription of genes that play important roles in cellular processes. Unlike DNA methylation, histone modifications can lead to either activation or repression depending upon which residues are modified and the type of modifications present. For example, tri-methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4) is enriched at transcriptionally active gene promoters [5], whereas di-and tri-methylation of H3K9 and tri-methylation of H3K27 is present at gene promoters that are transcriptionally repressed [6, 7]. As shown in Fig. 1, transcriptionally active chromatin in normal cells is characterized by acetylation of histone H3 and tri-methylation of H3K4. Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes during carcinogenesis is generally mediated by two distinct histone modifications: methylation of H3K9 and tri-methylation of H3K27. The Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) mediates epigenetic gene silencing by tri-methylating H3K27. Methylation of H3K9 works in concert with DNA methylation, whereas tri-methylation of H3K27 occurs independently of DNA methylation [8]. HDAC induces deacetylation of histone H3 in both of these pathways of epigenetic silencing.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer cells. Transcriptionally active chromatin in normal cells is characterized by acetylation of histone H3 (Ac) and tri-methylation of H3K4 (K4Me). Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes during carcinogenesis is generally mediated by two distinct histone modifications: methylation of H3K9 (K9Me) and trimethylation of H3K27 (K27Me). PRC2 mediates epigenetic gene silencing by tri-methylating H3K27. Methylation of H3K9 works in concert with DNA methylation induced by DNMTs, whereas trimethylation of H3K27 works independent of DNA methylation. HDAC induces deacetylation of histone H3 in the both pathways of epigenetic silencing. Open circle unmethylated DNA; filled circle methylated DNA

Biogenesis of MicroRNA (miRNA)

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are ~22 nucleotide (nt) non-coding RNAs that usually post-transcriptionally downregulate expression of various target genes. Currently, ~1,500 miRNAs have been identified in the human genome, each of which potentially controls hundreds of target genes and therefore play important roles in cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, and tumorigenesis [9, 10]. As shown in Fig. 2, miRNA genes are generally transcribed from transcription start sites (TSSs) by RNA polymerase II (pol II) to form primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs). Pol II-transcribed pri-miRNAs are capped with 7-methylguanosine and are polyadenylated. The nuclear RNase III enzyme Drosha and its co-factor DGCR8 process pri-miRNAs into ~60-nt precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs), which form an imperfect stem-loop structure. Pre-miRNAs are transported into the cytoplasm by exportin 5 and are subsequently cleaved by Dicer into mature miRNAs, which are then loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The miRNA/RISC complex downregulates specific gene products by translational repression via binding to partially complementary sequences in the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of the target mRNAs or by directing mRNA degradation via binding to perfectly complementary sequences [11].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Biogenesis of miRNA. MiRNA genes are transcribed from TSS by RNA pol II to form pri-miRNAs which are capped with 7-methylguanosine and polyadenylated (AAAAA). Drosha and its co-factor DGCR8 process pri-miRNAs into pre-miRNAs. Pre-miRNAs are transported into the cytoplasm and are subsequently cleaved by Dicer into mature miRNAs. Mature miRNAs are then loaded into RISC, where miRNAs downregulate specific gene products by translational repression via binding to partially complementary sequences in the 3′ UTR of the target mRNAs or by directing mRNA degradation via binding to perfectly complementary sequences

Epigenetic Regulation of miRNAs in Cancer

Because miRNAs can have large-scale effects through regulation of a variety of target genes, understanding the regulatory mechanisms controlling miRNA expression is important. Many miRNAs are expressed in a tissue and tumor-specific manner, implying that some miRNAs are under epigenetic control. We reported that ~5 % of human miRNAs are upregulated more than 3-fold by treatment of T24 bladder cancer cells with the DNA demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR) and the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor 4-phenylbutyric acid (PBA). In particular, miR-127, which is embedded in a CpG island, was remarkably induced by a decrease in DNA methylation and an increase in active histone marks around the promoter region of the miR-127 gene. In addition, activation of miR-127 by epigenetic treatment resulted in the downregulation of its target oncogene BCL6 [12]. We also demonstrated that treatment of gastric cancer cells with 5-Aza-CdR and PBA induced activation of miR-512-5p which is located at Alu repeats on chromosome 19. Activation of miR-512-5p by epigenetic treatment caused suppression of MCL1, resulting in apoptosis of gastric cancer cells [13]. These results indicate that chromatin remodeling by epigenetic treatment directly activates specific miRNA expression.

Lujambio et al. [14] compared miRNA expression profiling between the wild-type HCT116 colon cancer cell line and HCT116 after genetic disruption of both DNMT1 and DNMT3b (DKO cells). They found that 18 out of 320 miRNAs are significantly upregulated in DKO cells. In particular, miR-124a is silenced by its own CpG island hypermethylation in human tumors, but can be activated by inhibition of DNA methylation. They also demonstrated that the oncogene CDK6 is a target of miR-124a and that epigenetic silencing of miR-124a in cancer cells modulates CDK6 activity. Brueckner et al. [15] showed that methylation of the let-7a-3 gene, which is embedded in a CpG island, is cooperatively maintained by DNMT1 and DNMT3B. The let-7a-3 gene is heavily methylated in normal human tissues, but hypomethylated in lung adenocarcinomas. DNA hypomethylation causes increased expression of let-7a-3 leading to oncogenic changes. Recent studies have reported that miR-9-1 and miR-9-3 are potential tumor suppressor miRNAs and are inactivated by epigenetic mechanisms in human cancers [16, 17]. MiR-34a was identified as a target of p53 and induces cell cycle arrest, senescence and apoptosis [18, 19]. MiR-34a expression is silenced in several types of cancer due to aberrant CpG methylation of its promoter. Re-expression of miR-34a induced senescence and cell cycle arrest in pancreatic cancer cells, at least in part by targeting CDK6, indicating that miR-34a represents a tumor suppressor gene, which is inactivated by CpG methylation in pancreatic cancer [20]. MiR-34b and miR-34c are also silenced by aberrant CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer [21]. MiR-1 expression is markedly reduced by aberrant CpG island methylation in primary human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) compared with matching liver tissues. Reactivation of miR-1 by the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5-AzaC) with downregulation of its target genes FoxP1, MET and HDAC4 suppressed proliferation of HCC cells [22]. As summarized in Table 1, we and other groups have reported that specific miRNAs can be directly regulated from their own promoters by epigenetic alterations induced by chromatin modifying drugs or by genetic disruption of key DNMTs in cancer.

Table 1.

miRNAs regulated by epigenetics

miRNA Host gene CpG island Target gene Expression References
let-7a-3 + Overexpressed in lung cancer [15]
miR-1 C20orf166 + FoxP1, MET, HDAC4 Silenced in hepatocellular carcinoma [22]
miR-9-1 + Silenced in breast cancer [17]
miR-9-3 + Silenced in cancer metastasis [16]
miR-34a + CDK6 Silenced in cancer [20]
miR-34a* + XIAP Downregulated in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts [53]
miR-34b/c BC021736 + MET, CCNE2, CDK4, CDK6 Silenced in colon cancer [16,21]
Silenced in cancer metastasis
miR-124a + CDK6 Silenced in cancer [14]
miR-126 EGFL7 + DNMT1 Silenced in bladder and prostate cancer [25, 50]
Overexpressed in lupus CD4+ T cells
miR-127 + BCL6 Silenced in bladder and prostate cancer [12]
miR-342 EVL + Silenced in colon cancer [26]
miR-512-5p Alu repeats MCL1 Activated by epigenetic tharapy of gastric cancer [13]

Some miRNAs reside within the intronic regions of either coding or non-coding transcription units [23]. It is believed that intronic miRNAs are coordinately expressed with their host gene mRNA [23]. Kim et al. [24] revealed the processing mechanism for intronic miRNAs, in which intronic miRNAs are processed from unspliced intronic regions before splicing catalysis, indicating that both intronic miRNAs and their host genes are generated from a common transcript. This suggests the expression of intronic miRNAs depends on the regulation of their host genes. We have found that the tumor suppressor miR-126, which is located within an intron of the EGFL7gene, is downregulated in human cancer cell lines and in primary bladder and prostate tumors. MiR-126 and one of the transcripts of EGFL7 that has a CpG island promoter are concomitantly upregulated in cancer cell lines by inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation. These findings suggest that epigenetic changes can control expression of tumor suppressor intronic miRNAs by directly controlling their host genes [25]. MiR-342 is also located within an intron of the EVL gene, and is silenced in colorectal cancer. The expression of miR-342 is coordinated with the expression of EVL by CpG island methylation upstream of EVL. This supports a mechanism for silencing intronic miRNAs in cancer by epigenetic alterations of cognate host genes [26]. These findings indicate that epigenetic treatment activates miRNA expression in two ways: by directly activating miRNAs such as miR-127 from their own promoters and/or by activating intronic miRNAs such as miR-126 together with their host genes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Epigenetic activation of miRNAs. Epigenetic treatment activates miRNA expression in two ways: by directly activating miRNAs such as miR-127from their own promoters (a) and by activating intronic miRNAs such as miR-126 together with their host genes (b). Open circle unmethylated CpG site, filled circle methylated CpG site

Chromatin-Modifying Factors Regulated by miRNAs in Cancer

Recent studies have reported that miRNAs directly regulate key chromatin-modifying factors such as DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and EZH2, suggesting that these miRNAs have important roles in the epigenetic control of gene expression (Table 2). MiR-152 is downregulated in human cancers, including HCC and endometrial cancer, and targets DNMT1[27, 28]. In fact, miR-152 may act as a tumor suppressor via suppression of DNMT1. Fabbri et al. showed that the miR-29 family target DNMT3A and DNMT3B, and expression levels of the miR-29 family were suppressed in lung cancer. The reduced expression of the miR-29 family induced overexpression of DNMT3A and DNMT3B, resulting in aberrant DNA methylation in lung cancer [29]. PRC1 and PRC2-mediated epigenetic regulation is critical for maintaining homeostasis [30]. PRC2 mediates epigenetic gene silencing by trimethylation of H3K27 and aberrantly silences tumor suppressor genes in cancer. EZH2, the catalytic subunit of PRC2, enhances tumorigenesis and is commonly overexpressed in several types of cancers. MiR-101 is downregulated in bladder cancer, and miR-101 directly represses EZH2. This suggests that abnormal downregulation of miR-101 could lead to the overexpression of EZH2 frequently seen in cancer. MiR-101 may be a potent tumor suppressor by altering global chromatin structure through repression of EZH2 [31, 32]. Cao et al. have identified several miRNAs such as miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-203 that are repressed by EZH2. These miRNAs, in turn, regulate the expression of PRC1 proteins BMI1 and RING2, indicating a coordinate regulation of PRC1 and PRC2 activities that is mediated by miRNAs [33].

Table 2.

Chromatin modifying factors regulated by miRNAs

Chromatin-modifying factors miRNAs Expression References
DNMT1 miR-21, miR-148a,
miR-126, miR-152
MiR-21, miR-148a, and miR-126 are over-expressed in lupus CD4+ T
 cells with downregulation of DNMT1.3
[27, 28, 49, 50]
miR-152 is silened in cancer with upregulation of DNMT1.
DNMT3A, DNMT3B miR-29a, 29b, 29c miR-29 family are silened in lung cancer with upregulation of DNMT3A
 and DNMT3B.
[29]
EZH2 miR-101 miR-101 is silenced in cancer with upregulation of EZH2. [31, 32]

Epigenetics and Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases are complex, display a spectrum of severity, and their etiology is poorly understood. In addition, there are many different cell types that may participate in autoimmune pathogenesis, which complicates the elucidation of distinct molecular mechanisms for disease initiation and progression. Despite the difficulties in studying autoimmune disease, reports have isolated distinct cell populations in specific diseases and have shown clear molecular alterations that likely contribute to pathogenesis. Although there is a genetic predisposition to developing autoimmune disease, the story does not stop there. This is highlighted by the discordance in monozygotic twins for some autoimmune diseases being as high as 85 % (in rheumatoid arthritis). Clearly, in many cases of aberrant autoimmunity, sequence independent changes in gene regulation are most important [34].

The major pathologic phenomena of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are cartilage and bone damage from synovial hyperplasia caused by elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines produced by activated B and T cells, amongst other cell types. Therefore, studies have primarily focused on synovial fibroblasts (SF) and lymphocytes. RA synovial fibroblasts (RASF) differ in both morphology and gene expression from their healthy tissue counterparts. A role for DNA hypomethylation in the pathogenesis of RA was first suggested by the aberrant expression of L1 elements in RA tissues. L1 are normally silenced retrotransposoms, which were induced by treatment of normal SFs with 5-Aza-CdR [35]. Moreover, global hypomethylation was observed in RASF along with a decrease in DNMT1, and normal fibroblasts treated with 5-AzaC acquired an activated phenotype [36]. There is also evidence of epigenetically upregulated markers of inflammation in RA. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that correlates with RA disease activity, and was hypomethylated with corresponding upregulated mRNA levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from RA patients [37].

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting from widespread tissue damage caused by autoreactive T lymphocytes and the production of autoantibodies. A decrease in enzymatic activity of DNMTs is associated with defective DNA methylation and aberrant gene regulation in SLE. Specifically, T cells isolated from SLE patients had decreased DNA methylation, and normal T cells treated with 5-AzaC showed functional and phenotypic similarities to T cells from SLE patients [3841]. In addition, white blood cells from monozygotic twin SLE patients had marked DNA hypomethylation when compared to their healthy siblings [42]. CD4+ T cell studies have shown there is overexpression and hypomethylation of genes involved in signaling pathways associated with cell-cell adhesion, T cell proliferation and clonal expansion, and B cell IgG overproduction [4346]. IL-6 is associated with SLE disease severity and a recent report noted hypomethylation of an IL-6 promoter in SLE B cells [47]. The study also showed that increased IL-6 in B cells decreased DNMT1 expression and led to impaired B cell receptor signaling, which is relevant to SLE pathogenesis.

miRNA Misexpression in Autoimmune Diseases

Several studies have shown that miRNAs are an integral part of regulating the immune response and immune cell development [48]. Therefore, it was expected that miRNAs were also involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Examining T cells from SLE patients revealed several dysregulated miRNAs. MiR-21 and miR-148a were overexpressed in CD4+ T cells from patients with SLE, which contribute to DNA hypomethylation by repressing DNMT1 expression (Table 2). This in turn leads to the overexpression of autoimmune-associated methylation-sensitive genes, such as CD70 and LFA-1, via promoter demethylation. MiR-148a directly suppressed DNMT1 expression by targeting the protein coding region of its transcript, whereas miR-21 indirectly downregulated DNMT1 expression by targeting an important autoimmune gene, RASGRP1, which mediated the Ras-MAPK pathway upstream of DNMT1 [49]. Another report has shown that miR-126 was upregulated and suppressed DNMT1 as a direct target in SLE CD4+ T cells. Expression of the miR-126 host gene EGFL7 was also upregulated in CD4+ T cells from patients with SLE, possibly in a hypomethylation-dependent manner (Tables 1 and 2). Thus, miR-126 regulates DNA methylation in CD4+ T cells and contributes to Tcell autoreactivity in SLE by directly targeting DNMT1 [50]. These findings demonstrated a critical functional link between miRNAs and aberrant DNA hypomethylation in SLE CD4+ T cells. Inquiries into the functional significance of miR-142-3p/5p downregulation in SLE CD4+ T cells showed it directly suppressed members of the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family, IL-10 and CD84, and SLAM-associated protein (SAP). Enforced expression of miR-142-3p/5p in SLE CD4+ T cells restored IL-10, CD84, and SAP levels, and decreased both T cell activity and IgG production, while inhibiting miR-142-3p/5p expression in normal CD4+ T cells induced a SLE-like phenotype. Studies of PBMCs in SLE patients revealed several miRNAs were misexpressed when compared to controls [51]. Specifically, miR-146a, which was inhibited in SLE, targeted key signaling proteins in the interferon pathway [52].

Expression levels of miR-34a* were found to be reduced in RASFs compared to SFs from osteoarthritis (OA) patients, where levels of miR-34a, miR-34b/b*, and miR-34c/c* did not differ. The promoter of miR-34a/34a* was methylated and transcription of the miR-34a duplex was induced upon treatment with demethylating agents. Enforced expression of miR-34a* led to an increased rate of FasL- and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in RASFs. Moreover miR-34a* directly suppressed X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), which was upregulated in RASF (Table 1). These findings suggest that a methylation-specific down-regulation of proapoptotic miR-34a* in RASFs results in up-regulation of its direct target XIAP, thereby contributing to the resistance of RASFs to apoptosis [53].

Stanczyk et al. analyzed differential miRNA expression in RASFs treated with TNFα and found that miR-146a and miR-155 were upregulated. Both of these miRNAs also had higher levels of expression than in OASFs. Functional studies showed that miR-155 expression led to repression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and -3 [54]. A subsequent report from this group revealed that miR-203 was upregulated in RASFs when compared to OASFs or healthy controls. Interestingly, miR-203 levels in normal SFs did not change with TNFα or IL-1β treatment, but were increased by treatment with 5-azaC. Enforced miR-203 expression increased levels of MMP-1 and IL-6, though the IL-6 induction was dependent on an intact NF-κB pathway [55]. Studies using synovial tissue (not RASF) from RA patients showed that miR-146 was upregulated when compared to OA patients, and miR-146 expression in RASFs was induced by TNFα and IL-1β [56]. When PBMCs of RA patients were analyzed, miR-146a, miR-155, miR-132, and miR-16 were overexpressed compared to controls, showing similarities to the miRNA misexpression patterns seen in RASFs [57].

Altered miRNA expression has also been found in multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disease characterized by demyelination from myelin-specific CD4+ T cells. Otaegui et al. found that miR-18b and miR-599 were associated with relapse, while miR-96 was associated with remission and the interleukin and WNT pathways [58]. Interleukin 17 (IL-17)-producing T helper cells (T(H)-17 cells) play an important role in autoimmune pathogenesis including MS. MiR-326, a T(H)-17 associated miRNA, levels correlated with disease severity, and miR-326 promoted T(H)-17 differentiation by targeting Ets-1, a negative regulator of T(H)-17 differentiation [59].

Perspectives

A promising option for cancer treatment is the use of epigenetic drugs which inhibit tumor growth by several mechanisms including restoring the expression of epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes and miRNAs [60]. Inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone deacetylation can work synergistically to suppress growth of cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. This effect may be caused by inducing cancer cells to differentiate, re-expressing aberrantly silenced tumor suppressor genes, and re-expressing tumor antigens which would aid immune surveillance [60]. Many epigenetic drugs have shown promising results in clinical trials for cancer [61, 62]. Applying these epigenetic drugs to autoimmune diseases such as SLE and RA, which show aberrant epigenetic alterations, may lead to clinical benefits. In fact, a HDACi was used in a clinical trial for juvenile idiopathic arthritis [63]. Another intriguing therapeutic avenue would enforce expression of multiple miRNAs that may act synergistically for a specific disease [64, 65]. Taken together, alterations in epigenetic marks and miRNAs are critical to the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis and autoimmunity, and further elucidating the complex layers of regulation may lead to novel treatments for these diseases.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NCI grant (RO1 CA138794, GL), a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists A (23680090 to Y.S. and 24590993 to H.S.) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), the Science Research Promotion Fund from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools in Japan (to Y.S.), and Inaida Foundation (to H.S.).

Contributor Information

Yoshimasa Saito, Division of Pharmacotherapeutics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8512, Japan, yoshimasa.saito@gmail.com.

Hidetsugu Saito, Division of Pharmacotherapeutics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8512, Japan.

Gangning Liang, Department of Urology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-9181, USA.

Jeffrey M. Friedman, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA, jeffrey.friedman@vanderbilt.edu

References

  • 1.Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature. 2004;429:457–463. doi: 10.1038/nature02625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gal-Yam EN, Saito Y, Egger G, Jones PA. Cancer epigenetics: modifications, screening, and therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:267–280. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.061606.095816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Okano M, Xie S, Li E. Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nat Genet. 1998;19:219–220. doi: 10.1038/890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eden A, Gaudet F, Waghmare A, Jaenisch R. Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation. Science. 2003;300:455. doi: 10.1126/science.1083557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liang G, Lin JC, Wei V, et al. Distinct localization of histone H3 acetylation and H3-K4 methylation to the transcription start sites in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:7357–7362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401866101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293:1074–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1063127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kondo Y, Shen L, Cheng AS, et al. Gene silencing in cancer by histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation independent of promoter DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2008;40:741–750. doi: 10.1038/ng.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:857–866. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saito Y, Suzuki H, Hibi T. The role of microRNAs in gastrointestinal cancers. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(Suppl 19):18–22. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2285-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.He L, Hannon GJ. MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:522–531. doi: 10.1038/nrg1379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saito Y, Liang G, Egger G, et al. Specific activation of microRNA-127 with downregulation of the proto-oncogene BCL6 by chromatin-modifying drugs in human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saito Y, Suzuki H, Tsugawa H, et al. Chromatin remodeling at Alu repeats by epigenetic treatment activates silenced microRNA-512-5p with downregulation of Mcl-1 in human gastric cancer cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:2738–2744. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lujambio A, Ropero S, Ballestar E, et al. Genetic unmasking of an epigenetically silenced microRNA in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1424–1429. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brueckner B, Stresemann C, Kuner R, et al. The human let-7a-3 locus contains an epigenetically regulated microRNA gene with oncogenic function. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1419–1423. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lujambio A, Calin GA, Villanueva A, et al. A microRNA DNA methylation signature for human cancer metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13556–13561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803055105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lehmann U, Hasemeier B, Christgen M, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of microRNA gene hsa-mir-9-1 in human breast cancer. J Pathol. 2008;214:17–24. doi: 10.1002/path.2251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.He L, He X, Lim LP, et al. A microRNA component of the p53 tumour suppressor network. Nature. 2007;447:1130–1134. doi: 10.1038/nature05939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tazawa H, Tsuchiya N, Izumiya M, Nakagama H. Tumor-suppressive miR-34a induces senescence-like growth arrest through modulation of the E2F pathway in human colon cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15472–15477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707351104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lodygin D, Tarasov V, Epanchintsev A, et al. Inactivation of miR-34a by aberrant CpG methylation in multiple types of cancer. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:2591–2600. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.16.6533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Toyota M, Suzuki H, Sasaki Y, et al. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-34b/c and B-cell translocation gene 4 is associated with CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4123–4132. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Datta J, Kutay H, Nasser MW, et al. Methylation mediated silencing of MicroRNA-1 gene and its role in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5049–5058. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 23.Rodriguez A, Griffiths-Jones S, Ashurst JL, Bradley A. Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units. Genome Res. 2004;14:1902–1910. doi: 10.1101/gr.2722704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim YK, Kim VN. Processing of intronic microRNAs. EMBO J. 2007;26:775–783. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saito Y, Friedman JM, Chihara Y, Egger G, Chuang JC, Liang G. Epigenetic therapy upregulates the tumor suppressor microRNA-126 and its host gene EGFL7 in human cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;379:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grady WM, Parkin RK, Mitchell PS, et al. Epigenetic silencing of the intronic microRNA hsa-miR-342 and its host gene EVL in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:3880–3888. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang J, Wang Y, Guo Y, Sun S. Down-regulated microRNA-152 induces aberrant DNA methylation in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting DNA methyltransferase 1. Hepatology. 2010;52:60–70. doi: 10.1002/hep.23660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsuruta T, Kozaki K, Uesugi A, et al. miR-152 is a tumor suppressor microRNA that is silenced by DNA hypermethylation in endometrial cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6450–6462. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:15805–15810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707628104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim W, Bird GH, Neff T, et al. Targeted disruption of the EZH2-EED complex inhibits EZH2-dependent cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 2013;9:643–650. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Friedman JM, Liang G, Liu CC, et al. The putative tumor suppressor microRNA-101 modulates the cancer epigenome by repressing the polycomb group protein EZH2. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2623–2629. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Varambally S, Cao Q, Mani RS, et al. Genomic loss of microRNA-101 leads to overexpression of histone methyltransferase EZH2 in cancer. Science. 2008;322:1695–1699. doi: 10.1126/science.1165395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cao Q, Mani RS, Ateeq B, et al. Coordinated regulation of polycomb group complexes through microRNAs in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ballestar E. Epigenetics lessons from twins: prospects for autoimmune disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010;39:30–41. doi: 10.1007/s12016-009-8168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Neidhart M, Rethage J, Kuchen S, et al. Retrotransposable L1 elements expressed in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue: association with genomic DNA hypomethylation and influence on gene expression. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:2634–2647. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2634::AID-ANR3>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karouzakis E, Gay RE, Michel BA, Gay S, Neidhart M. DNA hypomethylation in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3613–3622. doi: 10.1002/art.25018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nile CJ, Read RC, Akil M, Duff GW, Wilson AG. Methylation status of a single CpG site in the IL6 promoter is related to IL6 messenger RNA levels and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2686–2693. doi: 10.1002/art.23758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ballestar E, Esteller M, Richardson BC. The epigenetic face of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2006;176:7143–7147. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Deng C, Kaplan MJ, Yang J, et al. Decreased Rasmitogen-activated protein kinase signaling may cause DNA hypomethylation in T lymphocytes from lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:397–407. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2<397::AID-ANR59>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lei W, Luo Y, Lei W, et al. Abnormal DNA methylation in CD4+ T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and dermatomyositis. Scand J Rheum. 2009;38:369–374. doi: 10.1080/03009740902758875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Richardson BC, Strahler JR, Pivirotto TS, et al. Phenotypic and functional similarities between 5-azacytidine-treated T cells and a T cell subset in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:647–662. doi: 10.1002/art.1780350608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Javierre BM, Fernandez AF, Richter J, et al. Changes in the pattern of DNA methylation associate with twin discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genome Res. 2010;20:170–179. doi: 10.1101/gr.100289.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kaplan MJ, Lu Q, Wu A, Attwood J, Richardson B. Demethylation of promoter regulatory elements contributes to perforin overexpression in CD4+ lupus T cells. J Immunol. 2004;172:3652–3661. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lu Q, Kaplan M, Ray D, et al. Demethylation of ITGAL (CD11a) regulatory sequences in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1282–1291. doi: 10.1002/art.10234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lu Q, Wu A, Tesmer L, Ray D, Yousif N, Richardson B. Demethylation of CD40LG on the inactive X in T cells from women with lupus. J Immunol. 2007;179:6352–6358. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.9.6352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Oelke K, Lu Q, Richardson D, et al. Overexpression of CD70 and overstimulation of IgG synthesis by lupus T cells and T cells treated with DNA methylation inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1850–1860. doi: 10.1002/art.20255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Garaud S, Le Dantec C, Jousse-Joulin S, et al. IL-6 modulates CD5 expression in B cells from patients with lupus by regulating DNA methylation. J Immunol. 2009;182:5623–5632. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.O’Connell RM, Rao DS, Chaudhuri AA, Baltimore D. Physiological and pathological roles for microRNAs in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:111–122. doi: 10.1038/nri2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pan W, Zhu S, Yuan M, et al. MicroRNA-21 and microRNA-148a contribute to DNA hypomethylation in lupus CD4+ T cells by directly and indirectly targeting DNA methyltransferase 1. J Immunol. 2010;184:6773–6781. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhao S, Wang Y, Liang Y, et al. MicroRNA-126 regulates DNA methylation in CD4+ T cells and contributes to systemic lupus erythematosus by targeting DNA methyltransferase 1. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1376–1386. doi: 10.1002/art.30196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dai Y, Huang YS, Tang M, et al. Microarray analysis of microRNA expression in peripheral blood cells of systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus. 2007;16:939–946. doi: 10.1177/0961203307084158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tang Y, Luo X, Cui H, et al. MicroRNA-146A contributes to abnormal activation of the type I interferon pathway in human lupus by targeting the key signaling proteins. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1065–1075. doi: 10.1002/art.24436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Niederer F, Trenkmann M, Ospelt C, et al. Down-regulation of microRNA-34a* in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts promotes apoptosis resistance. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1771–1779. doi: 10.1002/art.34334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stanczyk J, Pedrioli DM, Brentano F, et al. Altered expression of MicroRNA in synovial fibroblasts and synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:1001–1009. doi: 10.1002/art.23386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stanczyk J, Ospelt C, Karouzakis E, et al. Altered expression of microRNA-203 in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts and its role in fibroblast activation. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:373–381. doi: 10.1002/art.30115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nakasa T, Miyaki S, Okubo A, et al. Expression of microRNA-146 in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:1284–1292. doi: 10.1002/art.23429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pauley KM, Satoh M, Chan AL, Bubb MR, Reeves WH, Chan EK. Upregulated miR-146a expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(4):R101. doi: 10.1186/ar2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Otaegui D, Baranzini SE, Armananzas R, et al. Differential micro RNA expression in PBMC from multiple sclerosis patients. PloS One. 2009;4:e6309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Du C, Liu C, Kang J, et al. MicroRNA miR-326 regulates TH-17 differentiation and is associated with the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:1252–1259. doi: 10.1038/ni.1798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jones PA, Baylin SB. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 2007;128:683–692. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Garcia-Manero G. Demethylating agents in myeloid malignancies. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20:705–710. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328313699c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lane AA, Chabner BA. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5459–5468. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vojinovic J, Damjanov N, D’Urzo C, et al. Safety and efficacy of an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1452–1458. doi: 10.1002/art.30238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Su SF, Chang YW, Andreu-Vieyra C, et al. miR-30d, miR-181a and miR-199a-5p cooperatively suppress the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone and signaling regulator GRP78 in cancer. Oncogene. 2012;32(39):4694–701. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Qiu X, Friedman JM, Liang G. Creating a flexible multiple microRNA expression vector by linking precursor microRNAs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;411:276–280. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES