Abstract
Draft genome sequences of three P. aeruginosa strains from the PA7 clade are presented here. Their lengths are 6.36 (EML528), 6.44 (EML545), and 6.33 Mb (EML548). Comparisons with the PA7 genome showed 5,113 conserved coding sequences (CDSs), and significant numbers of strain-specific CDSs. Their analysis will improve our understanding of this highly divergent clade.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a notorious opportunistic pathogen with intrinsic as well as acquired antibiotic resistances. It can provoke, among others, wound and burn infections, as well as acute and chronic respiratory infections, especially in cystic fibrosis patients (1). The P. aeruginosa pan-genome is known for its developed arsenal of virulence factors (2). PA7 is a clinical isolate from Argentina, which was found quite distinct from the other P. aeruginosa strains (2, 3). Gomila et al. (4) showed this genome to have diverged early from the other lineages through their phylogenomics analyses of the Pseudomonas. The genome sequences of the three PA7-related strains presented here will provide additional insights into the understanding of P. aeruginosa genomic organizations and its PA7 clade, especially regarding the evolutionary dynamics of genomic islands and other mobile elements playing a part in virulence and antibiotic resistances.
The strains were recovered from the EML-BRC collection of the French Network of Biological Resources Centers (FBRCMi; http://www.fbrcmi.fr). They were detected in the collection through lecA, lecB, and ecfX PCR screenings, sequencings, and DNA sequence comparisons (A. M. Boukerb et al., submitted for publication; [5]). The three selected strains had the following collection numbers: (a) EML528/CIP58.35 and (b) EML545/CIP59.45, initially reported by Kohler (6), and (c) EML548/CIP72.26, reported by Haynes (7). Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight bacterial broths according to Johnson et al. (8). Paired-end DNA sequences were generated by the HiSeq2000 Illumina system (Beckman Coulter, USA). The average insert size was about 260 bp (including 120 bp of adapters). Version 0.10.1 of FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) was applied to check the quality of the generated 3,252,311, 3,261,408, and 3,181,166 reads, respectively. The paired-end reads were assembled de novo using the Mira genome assembler (9). Final assemblies contained 53, 62, and 120 contigs, with the largest ones being, respectively, 702,159 bp, 527,139 bp, and 307,235 bp. Total sequence spanning scaffolds were 6,365,411 bp, 6,442,109 bp, and 6,333,481 bp. Genome contigs were aligned against the PA7 genome sequence using the Mauve Contig Mover version 2.3.1 (http://asap.genetics.wisc.edu/software/mauve), and manual checks were done with ACT (Artemis Comparison Tool) at http://www.webact.org. The assembled genome sequences were processed through the Magnifying Genome platform using an automatic annotation pipeline (MaGe, http://www.genoscope.fr/agc/mage; [10]) and completed with manual checks and annotations. The assembled genomes contain, respectively, 6,409, 6,463, and 6,470 genomic objects, among which 6,281, 6,318, and 6,353 coding sequences could be detected. These genomes harbored four copies of the rRNA operons, 63 tRNAs, and 21 ncRNA genes. The GC contents were relatively close to that of the PA7 genome (~66.6%).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the following accession numbers: LFXS00000000 for EML528, LGJE00000000 for EML545, and LFXR00000000 for EML548. The versions described in this paper are the first versions: LFXS01000000, LGJE01000000, and LFXR01000000, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partly funded by Anses project “pyo-eau” no. 2011/1/137 of the “Programme Environnement-Santé-Travail” (French Ministers in charge of ecological and environmental issues). Parts of this work were also funded by the French Fond Unique Interministériel (Oseo and DGCIS) through the “anti-pyo” project.
A.B. and B.C. acknowledge support from GDR Pseudomonas. We thank Audrey Dubost for assistance with the DNA sequence analyses, and the LABGeM team for the functional annotation.
Footnotes
Citation Boukerb AM, Marti R, Cournoyer B. 2015. Genome sequences of three strains of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA7 clade. Genome Announc 3(6):e01366-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01366-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ratjen F, Döring G. 2003. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 361:681–689. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12567-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Valot B, Guyeux C, Rolland JY, Mazouzi K, Bertrand X, Hocquet D. 2015. What it takes to be a Pseudomonas aeruginosa? The core genome of the opportunistic pathogen updated. PLoS One 10:e0126468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roy PH, Tetu SG, Larouche A, Elbourne L, Tremblay S, Ren Q, Dodson R, Harkins D, Shay R, Watkins K, Mahamoud Y, Paulsen IT. 2010. Complete genome sequence of the multiresistant taxonomic outlier Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA7. PLoS One 5:e8842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gomila M, Peña A, Mulet M, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. 2015. Phylogenomics and systematics in Pseudomonas. Front Microbiol 6:214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lavenir R, Jocktane D, Laurent F, Nazaret S, Cournoyer B. 2007. Improved reliability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PCR detection by the use of the species-specific ecfX gene target. J Microbiol Methods 70:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kohler W. 1957. Zur Serologie der Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Z Immunforsch Exp Ther 114:282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Haynes WC. 1951. Pseudomonas aeruginosa—its characterization and identification. J Gen Microbiol 5:939–950. doi: 10.1099/00221287-5-5-939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson WM, Tyler SD, Rozee KR. 1994. Linkage analysis of geographic and clinical clusters in Pseudomonas cepacia infections by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and ribotyping. J Clin Microbiol 32:924–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chevreux B, Pfisterer T, Drescher B, Driesel AJ, Muller WE, Wetter T, Suhai S. 2004. Using the miraEST assembler for reliable and automated mRNA transcript assembly and SNP detection in sequenced ESTs. Genome Res 14:1147–1159. doi: 10.1101/gr.1917404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vallenet D, Belda E, Calteau A, Cruveiller S, Engelen S, Lajus A, Le Fevre F, Longin C, Mornico D, Roche D, Rouy Z, Salvignol G, Scarpelli C, Thil Smith AA, Weiman M, Medigue C. 2013. MicroScope—an integrated microbial resource for the curation and comparative analysis of genomic and metabolic data. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D636–D647. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]