Vascular Integrity in the Pathogenesis of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation

Abstract

Brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) is an important cause of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), particularly in the young population. ICH is the first clinical symptom in about 50 % of bAVM patients. The vessels in bAVM are fragile and prone to rupture, causing bleeding into the brain. About 30 % of unruptured and non-hemorrhagic bAVMs demonstrate microscopic evidence of hemosiderin in the vascular wall. In bAVM mouse models, vascular mural cell coverage is reduced in the AVM lesion, accompanied by vascular leakage and microhemorrhage. In this review, we discuss possible signaling pathways involved in abnormal vascular development in bAVM.

Introduction

Patients harboring brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) are at life-threatening risk of vessel rupture and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) [1, 2], and the malformed vessels are fragile and prone to rupture, causing bleeding into the brain. ICH is the first clinical symptom in about 50 % of bAVM patients. In a past study, we showed that 30 % of unruptured and non-hemorrhagic bAVMs demonstrated microscopic evidence of hemosiderin deposition in the vascular wall [3]. The presence of silent intralesional microhemorrhage may be a biomarker for the risk of ICH. However, the underlying mechanisms for bAVM rupture and microhemorrhage are not fully understood.

Current treatment options for bAVM are invasive. Approximately 20 % of patients are not offered interventional therapy because of excessive treatment-related risks [4, 5]. Furthermore, treatment of unruptured bAVMs—half of all cases—has become increasingly controversial because the natural history for these patients may be less morbid than invasive therapy [6–10]. So far, there is no specific medical therapy to treat bAVMs.

Previous studies have focused on the association of bAVM angioarchitecture and the risk of hemorrhage. These studies have found that a small number of draining veins, excessive deep-draining veins, vein stenosis, deep locations in the brain, and diffused bAVM morphology are risk factors for bAVM rupture [11–16]. Analysis of mean pressure of feeding arteries, in conjunction with other morphological or clinical risk factors, indicates that high arterial input pressure and venous outflow restriction (exclusively deep venous drainage) are the most powerful risk predictors for hemorrhagic bAVM presentation [17]. Previously, because of the lack of an animal model, the biology behind the abnormal vascular remodeling could not be tested.

We have established several bAVM mouse models through conditional knockout of endoglin (Eng) or Activin- like kinase 1 (Alk1; Acvlr1) genes, causative genes for an autosomal-dominated genetic disorder, Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) [18–21]. HHT is characterized by solid organ AVMs (i.e., in the lung, liver, and brain) and mucocutaneous telangiectasias [22]. As much as 5 % of bAVMs may be due to HHT [23]. As a familial form, bAVM in HHT possesses a similar phenotype to sporadic bAVM so that knowledge of these inherited gene pathways can shed light on sporadic disease pathogenesis [24]. Our mouse models resemble some phenotypes of human bAVM that are related to rupture risk, for example, iron deposition from red blood cell (RBC) extravasation [3] and macrophage infiltration [25–27].

In this review, we provide evidence that vascular structure is abnormal in bAVM, which might be formatted through the following pathways (Fig. 1): (1) ALK1, ENG, or matrix Gla protein (MGP) deletion leads to reduced expression of the Notch ligand, delta-like ligand-4 (DLL4), in microvascular endothelial cells; (2) decreased DLL4 results in a reduction of platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGFB) signaling. As a result, mural cell recruitment is impaired [19, 28].

Fig. 1.

Speculated pathways involved in AVM pathogenesis. Angiogenic factors, such as VEGF, induce endothelial mitogenesis. When mutation of AVM causative genes occurs, the angiogenic response leads to the formation of leaky vessels with abnormal vessel wall structure through altered Notch signaling and reduced Pdgf-b signaling

Impaired Vessel Wall Structure Correlates with Vascular Leakage and Microhemorrhage

Structural imperfection and immaturity of the vascular wall in bAVM suggest that vessels are histoembryogenically mal-developed. Prominent caliber dilation, hypertrophy of muscular layer, hyalinization, and an abnormal increase of elastic fibers might be the result of vascular remodeling in response to changed cerebral hemodynamics caused by an arteriovenous shunt [29].

Abnormal expression pattern of collagen (Col) I and Col III has been found in bAVMs [30]. Compared with control brain samples, bAVMs have a higher level of Col I and a lower level of Col III. The collagen fibers in bAVM vessels are disorganized and interrupted in the internal elastic lamina. Col I is a stiff fibrillar protein that provides resistance to tension, whereas Col III forms an elastic network [31] that prevents rupture of the vessel wall. Col I/Col III ratio is markedly increased in bAVM, which can increase the stiffness of the bAVM vessels. Interestingly, ruptured AVMs have higher type-I and -III collagen content than unruptured AVMs [32].

In a study analyzing surgical specimens of four adult cases of cerebral pial AVM [33], severe mural fibrosis was found in arteriovenous shunts larger than 700 μm located in the subarachnoid space. The authors found that vessels adjacent to shunting segments were arterialized veins and have segmental loss of the internal elastic membrane (IEM) and/ or smooth muscle cells (SMCs). The smaller shunts in the cerebral parenchyma were dilated small arteries, which showed abrupt loss of IEM and gradual loss of SMCs and transformed into dilated and tortuous veins [33]. These findings suggest that AVM rupture is caused not only by dilated veins but also by a segmental loss of IEM and SMCs.

SMCs in AVMs are in various stages of differentiation [34]. The expression of smoothelin is less prevalent in large AVM vessels than in the normal brain, which may reflect the loss of contractile property associated with hemodynamic stress [34]. Hoya et al. [35] analyzed the expression of SMC marker proteins, including smooth muscle alpha-actin and four myosin heavy chain isoforms (SM1, SM2, SMemb, and NMHC-A) in bAVM specimens. Although the arterial components of AVM showed the same staining pattern as mature normal arteries, two different types of abnormal veins were noticed in the AVM specimens: large veins with a thick and fibrous wall (so-called “arterialized” veins) and intraparenchymal thin-walled sinusoidal veins. The former express alpha-actin, SM1, SM2, and SMemb, and the latter, alpha- actin, SM1, and SM2. These markers are normally expressed in cerebral arteries. The results were compatible with arterialization of the cerebral veins caused by arteriovenous shunting [35, 36].

Abnormal vessel wall structure has also been noticed in the bAVM vessels in our mouse models [18, 37]. Compared with normal brain angiogenic foci, the lesion in bAVM mouse models have more vessels with diameters larger than 15 μm that lack α-SMA positive cells and have fewer pericytes. Reduced SMC and pericyte coverage is associated with increased vascular permeability and microhemorrhage.

All of the data cited thus far suggest that vessels in bAVMs have impaired wall structure, which may be the cause of AVM microhemorrhage and rupture. Currently, it is not clear which molecular signaling pathway is involved in the formation of these abnormal vascular structures. Through analysis of the surgically sectioned human bAVM specimens and bAVM in the HHT mouse models, we found Notch and Pdgf-b signaling pathways are involved in abnormal vascular formation and remodeling.

Altered Notch Signaling Causes Abnormal Angiogenesis in bAVM

There is empirical evidence that proteins involved in Notch signaling—including receptors, ligands, and downstream signals—are expressed in excised surgical specimens [38, 39]. Animal experiments support a potential link between Notch signaling and human diseases. In mice, both gain and loss of Notch function cause arteriovenous shunts to form during prenatal development [40]. Endothelial overexpression of a constitutive active Notch-4 intracellular domain (Notch 4*) results in bAVMs in young mice [41, 42], and normalizing Notch 4* expression results in lesion regression [43]. In addition, the expression of Notch ligands, Jagged 1 and 2, are increased in Mgp deficient mice [44]. All these data indicate that Notch signaling is involved in bAVM pathogenesis.

In mammals, there are 4 Notch receptors (Notch-1, -2, -3 and -4) and 5 ligands (Jagged1 and 2, Dll1, 3, and 4). Notch interacts with VEGF signaling during tip-cell and stalk-cell specification [45]. Dll4 is predominantly expressed in tip cells, and Jagged-1 in stalk cells. Dll4-Notch1 signaling suppresses tip cell formation leading to nonproductive sprouting, whereas Jagged-1 antagonizes the Dll4 ligand, thereby promoting sprouting angiogenesis [46]. We and others have found through analysis of human bAVM specimens and animal model development that a pro-angiogenic signal is needed for bAVM development [18, 47–51]. Without Dll4 signaling, a pro-angiogenic state is favored, for example, proliferation of tip at the expense of stalk cells [46, 52]. Blocking Dll4 in tumor models leads to an excessively branched, chaotic vascular network and impaired mural cell recruitment [53, 54].

In addition to its interaction with angiogenesis, Notch signaling is also essential in regulating arterial fate specification [55]. Notch and its downstream signaling are important in directing arterial-venous segregation and stabilizing brain endothelial-pericyte interaction during vasculogenesis in the embryos [55–57]. Absence of Notch results in expression of venous markers in the arteries [58]. We found that endothelial cells in some vessels in the bAVM lesion in a mouse model express both arterial and venous markers [18], suggesting that Alk1 deletion impairs the endothelial cell specification during angiogenesis. This altered specification may be the cause of irregular SMC coverage of AVM vessels.

The interaction of Alk1 or Eng with Notch signaling is just beginning to be examined [52, 59]. Notch signaling is important in vascular homeostasis and response to injury (angiogenesis) [59–62].

Gain and loss of Notch function may affect venous and arterial cells differently [63]. ALK1 knockdown in human umbilical artery endothelial cells (HUAEC) causes a reduction in EPHRIN B2, a marker for artery endothelial cells [63]. Deficiency of Mgp, a bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) inhibitor, causes alternation of Notch ligand- expression, dysregulation of endothelial differentiation, and development of bAVM [44]. Increased Bmp activity due to the lack of Mgp induces the expression of Alk1 in the cerebrovascular endothelium, which enhances the expression of Notch ligands (Jagged 1 and 2) and alters the expression of arterial and venous endothelial markers (Ephrin B2 and Eph B4). Expression of Alk1 does not change when Jagged expression is reduced [44], suggesting that Jagged 1 and 2 act downstream of Alk1.

Together, the data above suggest that Notch signaling is located downstream of bAVM causative genes, such as Alk1 or Mgp. Notch and its downstream signaling participate in bAVM pathogenesis in several ways: (1) enhancement of angiogenesis; (2) impairment of vessel wall structure; and (3) alteration of arterial and venous specification in endothelial cells.

Reduced PDGF-B Signaling Results in Abnormal Mural Cell Coverage in Brain AVM

PDGFs are important mitogens for various types of mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts, SMC, and pericytes [64]. They exert critical function during organogenesis in mammalian embryonic and early postnatal development. Increase or loss of function of PDGF is also noticed in diseases such as cancer, tissue fibrosis, and cardiovascular diseases in adults [65]. The PDGF family includes PDGF-A, -B, -C and -D, which are assembled as disulfide-linked homo- or heterodimers. PDGFs have two types of receptors: PDGFR-α and -β [64, 66]. Among PDGFs, PDGF-B has intrinsic pro-angiogenic effects. Microvascular integrity can be compromised when PDGF-B expression is too high [67] or too low [68, 69]. PDGF-B signaling through PDGFR-β regulates pericyte recruitment and differentiation to nascent capillaries. The differentiation of mesenchymal cells into the pericyte/SMC- lineage is dependent on PDGFR-β expression in mice [70].

Knockout Pdgf-b or Pdgfr-β in mice results in loss of pericytes from the microvessels [68]. The absence of pericytes also leads to endothelial hyperplasia (associated with abnormal endothelial junctions), and excessive endothelial luminal membrane folds [69]. Pdgfr-β or Pdgf-b null mice have cerebral hemorrhage with an absence of microvascular pericytes in the brain vessels and endothelial hyperplasia [69]. Reduction of vascular pericytes correlates with impairment of vascular integrity [71, 72]. Higher PDGF-B expression has been detected in some, but not all, resected sporadic human bAVM specimens compared with control tissue [73, 74]. Other cells in the brain can also express PDGF-B, which could obscure the analysis of PDGF-B expression [75].

We have demonstrated that expression of Pdgfr-β is reduced in the bAVM lesions of Alk1-deficient mice [19], suggesting a possible link between Alk1 and Pdfgr-β/Pdgf-b signaling pathways. However, it is not clear whether the reduced expression of Pdfgr-β is caused by the reduced number of pericytes in the tissue. Many AVM vessels in Alk1-deficient mice do not have the SMC-layer and have less pericyte coverage.

PDGF-B/PDGFR-β has also been implicated in skin and retina AVMs, as well as Eng-associated signaling pathway. Oral administration of thalidomide reduces the frequency and the duration of nosebleeds and blood transfusion requirements in a small group of HHT patients [28]. Thalidomide treatment does not inhibit endothelial cell proliferation and migration, but increases mural cell coverage of the vasculature through increasing Pdgf-b expression in endothelial cells [28].

The data above indicate that: (1) AVM-causative genes, such as Alk1 and Eng, play an important role in maintaining cerebrovascular integrity; (2) mutations of these genes result in abnormal angiogenic response, which leads to abnormal vessel formation; (3) PDGF-B signaling is one of the downstream signaling pathways involved in brain AVM pathogenesis; (4) upregulation of PDGF-B signaling may reduce the severity of bAVM phenotype, and thus could be developed into a therapeutic strategy to treat bAVM.

Other Signalings

Angiopoietin/TIE2 signaling also plays a role in the recruitment of peri-endothelial support structures. Alternations of angiopoietin/TIE2 expression in human bAVM specimens have been noticed [76], which could be a cause of defective vessel wall in bAVM. For example, angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), which allows loosening of cell-to-cell contacts, is overexpressed in the perivascular region in AVM vascular channels [76].

A key downstream consequence of VEGF and ANG-2 signaling contributing to the angiogenic phenotype is matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression. MMP-9 expression, in particular, appears to be higher in bAVM than in control tissue [27, 77]. Similarly, TIMP-1 and TIMP-3, which are naturally occurring MMP inhibitors, are also increased in bAVM but to a lesser degree.

Exactly how the dysplastic response propagates and leads to bAVM formation is not known. Recruitment of progenitor cell populations may be one source influencing AVM growth and development, an area that needs further exploration. For example, endothelial progenitor cells are present in the nidus of the brain and spinal cord AVMs, and may mediate pathological vascular remodeling and impact the clinical course of AVMs.

More generally, circulating bone marrow-derived cells have a major role in both microcirculatory angiogenesis [78, 79] and conductance vessel remodeling [80, 81]. If bAVM pathogenesis involves these two processes, it is reasonable to infer that bone marrow-derived cells may have an underappreciated role in lesion formation and growth. An unresolved issue with stem cell interaction is the extent to which progenitor cells actually integrate into existing tissue compartments, or whether they provide a nursing function by supplying critical components of the repair response, such as cytokines, growth factors, and enzymes, to the tissue.

In summary, we have reviewed the possible roles of Notch and Pdgf-b signaling in bAVM pathogenesis. In both brain and non-brain endothelial cells, Alk1 is upstream of Notch signaling [59], and Notch signaling is upstream of Pdgf-b, which appears to be an important regulator of cerebrovascular Pdgf-b expression [67]. The relationship between Eng function and Pdgf-β [28] and Notch signaling is not as well understood [52]. However, animal studies show that either correcting Notch signaling [43] or increasing Pdgf-b [28] expression resumes abnormal vascular structure in bAVM. Thus, by modulating these two pathways, new therapies could be developed.