Skip to main content
The West Indian Medical Journal logoLink to The West Indian Medical Journal
. 2015 Jun 5;63(5):431–435. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2013.252

Sharp Force Injuries at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica: A Seventeen-year Autopsy Review

Heridas por Armas Blancas en el Hospital Universitario de West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica: 17 Años de Examen de Autopsias

A Neblett 1, NP Williams 1,
PMCID: PMC4655698  PMID: 25781278

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence and patterns of fatal sharp force injuries, victims' demographics, cause of death and average survival time at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), Kingston, Jamaica.

Methods:

The autopsy records for 1990-2010 were searched for fatal cases of sharp force injuries. The records for 1998-2001were not located. A 17-year retrospective analysis was therefore performed and findings for the two periods, 1990-1997 and 2002-2010 were compared. All data were obtained from the provisional anatomical diagnoses (PAD) autopsy reports.

Results:

During the 17-year period, 57/4264 autopsies were performed for sharp force injuries, yielding an overall autopsy prevalence rate of 1.34%; 1.25%, 26/2086 (95% CI 0.77, 1.73) in Period 1 and 1.42%, 31/2178 (95% CI 0.92, 1.92) in Period 2. The majority were males (91.1%), in the age group 15-39 years (77%), mean age of 30.9 years (range = 17-65 years). Stab wounds predominated (91.3%) and the chest was the area most frequently stabbed (42.1%). In the 24 fatalities due to chest injuries only, eight (33.3%) had injuries to the heart alone. Forty-five patients (79.0%) died within 24 hours from exsanguination. Injury documentation at autopsy was deficient.

Conclusion:

Stabbing was the most common sharp force injury, mainly involving the chest, and young men were at greatest risk. Most patients died from exsanguination within 24 hours of admission. Introduction of synoptic-type reports for both clinical and autopsy examination may improve documentation.

Keywords: Jamaica, sharp force injuries

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of violence in Jamaica has been previously reported by Lemard and Hemenway (1). The drain on scarce hospital and national resources by an imminently preventable problem has been recognized and lamented (2-4). In the study by Lemard and Hemenway, they found that the most popular implements used in homicides between 1998 and 2002 were guns (66%), knives (19%) and machete or ice pick [6%] (1). A similar pattern was reflected in hospital admissions for penetrating injuries (2, 3).

Despite decreasing rates locally and internationally (5), the autopsy remains a vital tool in the evaluation of violent injuries and unnatural cause of death (5-11). Coroner's autopsies are important but under-utilized in elucidating the epidemiology of violent and unnatural deaths. The information gleaned may be critical, particularly when the consequences of violence decimate scarce resources in developing nations.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and patterns of sharp force injuries in an autopsy population at The University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI), Kingston, Jamaica, to describe the demographics of the victims and the resultant wounds and, further, to determine the average survival time post admission.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The autopsy records of the Department of Pathology, The University of the West Indies (UWI), were reviewed for all cases of patients who died at the UHWI from sharp force injuries between 1990 and 2010. Despite a diligent search, no records were found for 1998–2001. Autopsies performed on bodies that were not involved in sharp force injuries during the periods of 1990-1997 and 2001-2005 were excluded from this study, as were deaths from gunshot wounds. A 17-year retrospective review of the autopsy reports of patients who died from sharp force injuries was therefore performed, excluding these years 1998-2001, and the findings in the two periods (1990–1997 and 2002–2010) were compared.

Sharp force wounds are defined as incised wounds (cuts), penetrating incised wounds (stab wounds), chop wounds, non-human bites and venepunctures for medical or illicit use (13, 14). An incised wound is a superficial wound in which the size of the wound on the surface is larger than the depth of the wound, while the penetrating wound is deeper than its surface length. A chop wound is a wound caused by a heavy weapon or instrument which has at least one sharp cutting edge (5, 11, 13). Chop wounds often injure the underlying bone and imply the utilization of extreme force.

All data were obtained from the provisional anatomical diagnoses (PAD) postmortem reports from the Pathology Department, UWI. Each PAD postmortem report gave the major findings at autopsy, provided summaries of the victims' history and treatment and, finally, proposed a cause of death. The variables examined included patient's demographics, types of sharp force injuries inflicted, implements used, anatomical areas injured, survival time after admission, and motive for the injuries. The frequencies were calculated and the data tabulated.

RESULTS

The total number of autopsies performed in the 17-year period was 4264. The total number of cases of sharp force injuries was 57, yielding an average autopsy prevalence rate for sharp force injuries of 1.34%. The rates for the two periods under study were 1.25%, 26/2086 (95% CI 0.77, 1.73) in Period 1 and 1.42%, 31/2178 (95% CI 0.92, 1.92) in Period 2 (Table 1). There was no significant difference between the rates for the two periods.

Table 1. Number of autopsies performed at University Hospital of the West Indies 1990-2010.

Year No. of autopsies on sharp force injuries Total number of cases
1990 4 289
1991 1 244
1992 2 265
1993 1 225
1994 4 246
1995 9 268
1996 1 270
1997 4 279
1998 ? 249
1999 ? 212
2000 ? 235
2001 ? 280
2002 1 239
2003 2 278
2004 3 243
2005 8 303
2006 3 250
2007 7 240
2008 3 217
2009 2 221
2010 2 187
Total 57 5240

The highlighted areas indicate the years for which the provisional anatomical diagnoses autopsy reports were not located.

The majority were males (91.1%), in the age group 15-39 years (77%), with a mean age of 30.9 years [range = 17-65 years] (Fig. 1). There were five females in this study. The types of implements and the motives for the incidents could not be ascertained from the postmortem reports. Stab wounds were the commonest form of fatal sharp force injuries, occurring in 89.5% of the cases (Fig. 2A). The chest was the area most frequently stabbed (42.1%), followed by the abdomen [12.3%] (Fig. 2B). The heart was the most frequent sole organ injured (33.3%) in those with only chest wounds, and haemothorax was present in 79.1% (Table 2). The majority of patients died from exsanguination (79%) within 24 hours of hospital admission (Table 3).

Fig. 1. Demographics of victims involved in sharp force injuries (n = 52).

Fig. 1

Fig. 2A. Type of sharp force injury inflicted (n = 57).

Fig. 2A

Fig. 2B. Area of the body injured in victims with sharp force injury.

Fig. 2B

Table 2. Type of viscera injured and consequences in victims with only chest wounds.

Viscera injured Consequence
Type of organ involved n % Pleural cavity n %
Lung alone 3 12.5 Normal 1 4.2
Heart alone 8 33.3 Haemothorax 19 79.1
Major blood vessel 4 16.7 Pneumothorax 1 4.2
Not documented 2 8.3 Not documented 3 12.5
Combined (more than one) 7 29.2
Total 24 100 24 100

Table 3. Mode of death and period of survival.

Mode of death n % Period of survival n %
Shock with haemorrhage (exsanguination) 45 79 Instantaneous death 1 1.7
Septicaemia 2 3.5 Died within 24 hours 45 79
Brain injury 2 3.5 Survived beyond 24 hours 8 14
Brain injury and haemorrhage 4 7 Unknown 3 5.3
Others 4 7
Total 57 100 57 100

DISCUSSION

The overall prevalence of 1.34% for sharp force injuries in this autopsy population is low and below the clinical prevalence reported in Jamaica by Lemard and Hemenway (1), as this represents only fatal cases. In that study, sharp force injuries accounted for the second highest cause of penetrating injuries (25%), behind gunshot wounds (66%). Studies have shown that the commonest implements used in sharp force injuries were knives, ice picks and machetes. For penetrating cardiac injuries at the Kingston Public Hospital, Jamaica, between 1982 and 1989, knives (70%), ice picks (15%) and guns (9%) were the commonest implements used (4). A similar distribution of implements was noted in a previous study on penetrating injuries to the heart, in which fatality was present in 2/3 cases with injury to the left ventricle (12). In that study and one from South Africa (14), the age distribution and male preponderance were similar to the findings in this study.

The nature of the offending implement could not be determined in this study but stabbing alone was the most prevalent injury documented in 55 (89.5%) cases, implying the use of some penetrating type of implement. In sharp force injuries, wound examination and characterization are important. Inferences from the wound examination may be drawn concerning the nature and size of the instrument causing the injury or death, the force used to inflict the injury, the time of injury and whether the victim attempted to defend himself/herself. Patterns along the wound edge will reflect patterns on the implement such as serrated edges on knives. The direction of thrust and type of tissue penetrated should also be evaluated as these may give some indication of the position of the assailant and the amount of physical force. In this study, detailed characterization of the wounds was inadequate with only superficial descriptions of size and orientation. Therefore, an objective wound evaluation system may need to be established to ensure accuracy and consistency.

In this study, stab wounds were the cause of death in 89.5%, with shock due to exsanguination accounting for 79% of the mechanism of death. The chest is reportedly the most frequently stabbed area (15), and in this study, it was injured in 31 (54.4%) cases, being the sole area injured in 24 (42.1%) cases. The majority of the victims had injuries to the heart alone (n = 8; 33.3%). In general, stab wounds to the heart are often transfixing or through and through injuries with wounds to the right ventricle being more dangerous than those to the left ventricle. This is because of the absence of the “muscular self-sealing” effect on the right. In this study, we were unable to determine the specific location of the cardiac injuries. As a general rule, penetrating injuries to the lungs are also common with chest injuries, usually from stabbing by knives. The wounds may end in the lung parenchyma or in a large vessel or may be through and through injuries that emerge to cause further damage to the heart or great vessels (11, 13, 15).

Penetrating abdominal wounds are not very common (13, 15), as was evident in this study, with only seven cases documented. The bias in this autopsy series may also explain the low prevalence as abdominal injuries are often less fatal than chest injuries. Nevertheless, the liver and spleen especially may bleed extensively, causing haemoperitoneum and consequent fatality (13). The intestines and mesentery are the other major targets with wounds often being multiple because of the overlapping nature of the coils and mesentery (13). The kidneys are rarely stabbed except from a thrust in the back (11). The stomach is less commonly involved in abdominal injuries, but is not uncommonly involved in chest stabbings that pass downward through the diaphragm (11, 13). Determination of the “survival period after wounding” poses more of a challenge than determining cause of death, as a variety of factors need to be taken into consideration. These factors include not only those related to the victim, but also include factors related to the environment (13, 15). In this study, the survival time post hospital admission could only be commented on and most patients died from exsanguination within 24 hours. Degiannis et al, however, have suggested that diagnostic acumen and rapid surgical intervention would improve survival in patients who arrive alive at hospital (14). However, in a large population-based study by Rhee et al, the outcome was more dismal (16).

The study was limited by failure to locate all PAD postmortem reports for the entire period selected. Despite this, overlapping confidence intervals for the two periods affirmed that there was no significant difference between them. Other limitations included inadequate routine documentation of parameters related to the injuries, both from the clinical evaluation as well as from the autopsy. Documentation of antecedent events, proposed motives, implements utilized and wound characteristics were all deficient. This may be related to inexperience and inadequate training in forensic medicine and pathology. The institution of structured protocols may well be required to ensure that these pertinent information critical to the elucidation of the case are consistently documented. As has been shown with synoptic checklist type reporting in cancer (17, 18), standardized reports would formalize the documentation, even for non-specialist clinicians and pathologists. Consequently, in 2005, the National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) created the “forensic autopsy procedure standards” (amended 2010) aimed at providing a constructive framework that defines the fundamental services rendered by a professional forensic pathologist practising his or her art (19). Even with practical limitations in our setting, these standards could be adopted as a type of synoptic checklist for non-specialist pathologists.

In this study, young males were at greatest risk of sustaining fatal sharp force injuries. Stabbing was the most common type of injury, mainly involving the chest with injury to the heart. Most patients died from exsanguination within 24 hours of admission. Documentation of clinical and autopsy findings were deficient. Coroner's autopsies are important in the elucidation of the epidemiology of violent and unnatural deaths and therefore the introduction of synoptic-type reports for both clinical and autopsy examination may improve complete documentation of findings, even for non-specialists.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lemard G, Hemenway D. Violence in Jamaica: an analysis of homicides 1998–2002. Inj Prev. 2006;12:15–18. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mitchell VT, Scarlett MD, Amata AO. Trauma admissions to the ICU of the University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica. Trauma Care. 2001;11:86–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Plummer JM, Brown H, Jones K, Fearon-Boothe D, Meeks-Aitken N, McDonald AH. Trauma: the burden of a preventable problem. West Indian Med J. 2010;59:26–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McFarlane M, Branday JM. Penetrating injuries of the heart. West Indian Med J. 1990;39:74–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Escoffery C, Shirley S. Autopsy rates at the University Hospital of the West Indies, 1968–1997. West Indian Med J. 2000;49:164–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rutty GN, Duerden RM, Carter N, Clark JC. Are coroners' necropsies necessary? A prospective study examining whether a “view and grant” system of death certification could be introduced into England and Wales. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:279–284. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.4.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wagner SA. A colour atlas of the autopsy. CRC Press; 2004. Approach to the autopsy: purpose and philosophy. Available from: www.biomed.lib.umn.edu/help/guides/forensic. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McQuoid-Mason D, Pillemer B, Friedman C, Dada M. Basic traumatology. In: McQuoid-Mason D, editor. Crimes against women and children. A medico-legal guide. Dundee: Dundee University and the Independent Medico-Legal Unit; 2002. pp. 219–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Escoffery C, Shirley S. Traumatic deaths in Jamaica: a coroner's (medico-legal) autopsy study from the University Hospital of the West Indies. Med Sci Law. 2002;42:185–191. doi: 10.1177/002580240204200301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Escoffery C, Shirley S. Causes of sudden natural death in Jamaica: a medico-legal (coroner's) autopsy study from the University Hospital of the West Indies. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;129:116–121. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00268-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shepherd R. Simpson's Forensic Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. The examination of wounds; pp. 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Branday JM, Kumar EB, Spencer H. Intrapericardial heart and great vessel injuries. West Indian Med J. 1984;33:176–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knight B. Forensic pathology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. The pathology of wounds; pp. 150–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Degiannis E, Loogna P, Doll D, Bonanno F, Bowley DM, Smith MD. Penetrating cardiac injuries: recent experience in South Africa. World J Surg. 2006;30:1258–1264. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0463-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shkrum MJ, Ramsay DA. Forensic pathology of trauma: common problems for the pathologist. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2007. Penetrating trauma: sharp force injuries; pp. 357–403. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rhee PM, Foy H, Kaufmann C, Areola C, Boyle E, Maier RV, et al. Penetrating cardiac injuries: population-based study. J Trauma. 1998;45:366–370. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199808000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Idowu MO, Bekeris LG, Raab S, Ruby SG, Nakhleh RE. Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:969–974. doi: 10.5858/2009-0412-CP.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Siriwardana PN, Pathmeswaran A, Hewavisenthi J, Deen KI. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:849–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01680.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Peterson GF, Clark SC. Forensic autopsy performance standards. Atlanta, GA: National Association of Medical Examiners; 2006. Available from: http://www.mtf.org/pdf/name_standards_2006.pdf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The West Indian Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of The University of the West Indies

RESOURCES