Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) promotes transcriptional elongation by phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain (CTD). Structure-function studies show that this activity is dependent on a C-terminal kinase extension, as well as the binding of cyclin K (CycK). To better define these interactions we determined the crystal structure of the human CDK12/CycK complex with and without the kinase extension in the presence of AMP-PNP. The structures revealed novel features for a CDK, including a large β4-β5 loop insertion that contributes to the N-lobe interaction with the cyclin. We also observed two different conformations of the C-terminal kinase extension that effectively open and close the ATP pocket. Most notably, bound AMP-PNP was only observed when trapped in the closed state. Truncation of this C-terminal structure also diminished AMP-PNP binding, as well as the catalytic activity of the CDK12/CycK complex. Further kinetic measurements showed that the full length CDK12/CycK complex was significantly more active than the two crystallised constructs suggesting a critical role for additional domains. Overall, these results demonstrate the intrinsic flexibility of the C-terminal extension in CDK12 and highlight its importance for both ATP binding and kinase activity.
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK1-20) form a large family of serine/threonine protein kinases that depend on the binding of specific cyclin proteins for maximal catalytic activity1,2. CDKs are known for their critical roles in cell division, transcription and neuronal development, but also display more diverse functions, including control of spermatogenesis and Wnt signaling2,3,4. The cyclin subunit can contribute to the spatial3,5 and temporal6 regulation of CDK activity, as well as substrate recruitment7,8,9. Many CDKs additionally require phosphorylation by the CDK activating kinase (CAK; comprising CDK7/Cyclin H/MAT1 in humans), which targets a conserved threonine residue within the kinase activation loop10,11. This both stabilizes the active configuration of the CDK/cyclin complex and establishes greater interaction with the substrate7.
Human CDK12 (CrkRS) and its close homologue CDK13 (CDC2L5) are unusually large CDK family members (1,490 and 1,512 amino acids, respectively) containing a central kinase domain with flanking arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains12,13,14. Recent work indicates that these CDKs regulate transcription via assembly with the 65 kDa cyclin K1 subunit (herein CycK)15,16,17,18. The transcriptional cycle of initiation, elongation and termination is coordinated by the phosphorylation of heptad (Y1S2P3T4S5P6S7) repeats in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II19,20. Ser2 phosphorylation is required for transcriptional elongation and is performed by both CDK12/CycK and CDK9/CycT (P-TEFb; the positive transcription elongation factor b), which are identified as orthologues of S. cerevisiae Ctk1/Ctk2 and Bur1/Bur2, respectively17,21. CDK12 shows a distinct preference for CTD substrates with prior phosphorylation of Ser7 and fails to phosphorylate heptad repeats containing the common Lys7 variant22. CDK12 also assembles with multiple RNA processing factors12,23,24 and couples the transcription of pre-mRNA to 3’ end formation25,26. CDK12 complexes with cyclin L1 or L2 have also been reported to localise to nuclear speckles and to regulate RNA splicing12,27.
Most notably, CDK12 activity is critical for the expression of longer genes with a high number of exons, including key DNA damage response genes, such as BRCA1, ATR, FANCI and FANCD216,23. Tumour suppressor function is further suggested by the presence of disabling CDK12 mutations in ovarian cancer28,29,30. Conversely, loss of CDK12 sensitizes cancer cells to DNA damage, making CDK12 an attractive therapeutic target for combination treatments using PARP1/2 inhibitors29,31. The first crystal structure of the CDK12/CycK complex was recently solved in in the presence of ADP providing a useful guide for structure-based drug design22. This work also identified an unusual C-terminal αK helix in CDK12 that was important for catalytic activity.
Here, we report further structures of CDK12/CycK complexes solved in the presence of AMP-PNP and containing variable truncations of the C-terminal kinase extension. The structure of the longest CDK12 construct showed that the C-terminal αK helix is labile and can adopt multiple conformations. Notably, its presence at the ATP-binding pocket was correlated with AMP-PNP occupancy. The structures also revealed an unusual β4-β5 loop insertion that contributed to CycK interaction. Finally, we compared the kinetic parameters of our proteins and show that the full length CDK12/CycK complex remains significantly more active suggesting additional structural elements are required for optimal function.
Results
Soluble expression of CDK12 requires cyclin K
Human CDK12 and cyclin K are large multidomain proteins (Fig. 1a). To prepare CDK12 protein for crystallisation trials a number of kinase domain constructs exploring truncations between residues 661 to 1099 were cloned into a modified pFastBac vector and expressed in Sf9 insect cells. Small scale nickel-affinity purifications indicated that none of the hexahistidine-tagged constructs were solubly expressed (Fig. 1b). Cyclin-dependent kinases display inherent plasticity that may be stabilized by the binding of their cognate cyclin. Co-expression was therefore performed with suggested cyclin partners, including cyclin K1 (CycK) and cyclin L1 (CycL1). No constructs of CycL1 were identified that solubly expressed by themselves or when co-expressed with CDK12 protein (Fig. 1b). In contrast, all constructs of CDK12 were solubly expressed when co-expressed with CycK11–267 (cyclin domain corresponding to PDB ID: 2I53) allowing purification of the various CDK12/CycK complexes (Fig. 1b). Mass spectrometry revealed that many of the expressed CDK12 proteins were mono-phosphorylated (Fig. 1c), whereas the shorter construct CDK12715–1038 was essentially unphosphorylated (Fig. 1d). However, CDK12715–1038 was phosphorylated in vitro upon incubation with recombinant CAK from Candida albicans (Fig. 1d).
Structure determination
For scale up, comparable expression levels of CDK12 proteins and CycK were achieved by adjusting the ratio of the two viruses used for co-expression. The expressed complexes were purified to homogeneity using nickel affinity and size-exclusion chromatography. Crystals obtained using the non-phosphorylated CDK12715–1038 protein exhibited multiple lattices and could not be indexed. However, diffraction quality crystals in the monoclinic space group P21 were obtained when the same complex was phosphorylated with CAK. The resulting CDK12715–1038/CycK11–267 structure was solved by molecular replacement using CDK9 (PDB ID: 4BCG)32 and CycK (PDB ID: 2I53)33 as search models and refined at 3.15 Å resolution. Diffraction quality crystals in space group P21 (but with different cell dimensions) were also obtained for the larger CDK12715–1052/CycK11–267 complex, which was mono-phosphorylated after expression without further CAK treatment (Fig. 1c). This structure was refined at 3.15 Å resolution and similarly contained two protein complexes in the asymmetric unit (see Table 1 for data collection and refinement statistics for both structures).
Table 1. Diffraction data collection and refinement statistics.
Complex | CDK12715–1038/cyclin K11–267 | CDK12715–1052/cyclin K11–267 |
---|---|---|
PDB accession code | 4UN0 | 4CXA |
Data Collection | ||
Beamline | Diamond Light Source, I24 | Diamond Light Source, I02 |
Wavelength (Å) | 0.9686 | 0.97868 |
Resolutiona (Å) | 57.82–3.15 (3.37–3.15) | 30.53–3.15 (3.37–3.15) |
Spacegroup | P21 | P21 |
Cell dimensions | a = 49.6, b = 148.8, c = 92.2 Å | a = 69.8, b = 138.8, c = 71.9 Å |
α = γ = 90.0°, β = 94.2° | α = γ = 90.0°, β = 105.0° | |
No. unique reflectionsa | 22,936 (4145) | 22,908 (4132) |
Completenessa (%) | 99.4 (99.3) | 99.8 (99.9) |
I/σ(I)a | 8.7 (2.0) | 6.4 (1.5) |
Rmergea | 0.19 (0.87) | 0.19 (0.98) |
Redundancya | 4.3 (4.2) | 5.0 (4.9) |
Refinement | ||
ligands | — | AMP-PNP |
No. atoms in refinement | 8190 | 8694 |
R factor (%) | 21.7 | 22.4 |
Rfree (%) | 27.1 | 27.9 |
Average B factor (Å2) | 55 | 73 |
r.m.s. deviation bond lengthsb (Å) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
r.m.s. deviation bond anglesb (°) | 0.58 | 0.87 |
Molprobity | ||
Ramachandran favoured | 94% | 94% |
Ramachandran allowed | 5% | 5% |
aValues in brackets show the statistics for the highest resolution shells.
br.m.s. indicates root-mean-square.
The electron density maps for both structures were generally of high quality. In the complex of the longer CDK12 construct, the CDK12 chains were traced between residues Asp718-Gln1050, with the exception of residues Asp798-Ala799 and Ser889 in chain A and residues Arg1049-Gln1050 in chain C, which were excluded from the model. CycK chains B and D were traced between residues Thr20-Met265 and Pro22-Lys262 respectively. In the more truncated structure, the electron density was most complete for the complex comprising chains A and C. CycK (chain A) was modelled between residues Pro22-Gln260 and the bound CDK12 subunit (chain C) between residues Trp719-Pro1031, with the exception of two regions of poor electron density between Gln797-Lys803 and Lys975-Lys976, respectively.
The structures show three distinct protein complexes
The different chains in the CDK12/CycK structures share a common heterodimeric assembly of their folded domains, but exhibit significant differences in their protein C-termini yielding three distinct protein complexes (Fig. 2a). The longer CDK12715–1052 chains are distinguished by an additional αK helix that was also observed by Bösken et al.22 However, the current structures reveal hitherto unseen conformational plasticity in this C-terminal extension, which packs alongside the ATP pocket in chain A, but at the back of the kinase domain in chain C (Fig. 2a). Strikingly, the ligand AMP-PNP, included in all crystallisations, is bound only in chain A where its interactions are stabilized by the presence of the αK helix (Fig. 2a). Similarly, there is very poor or no electron density for AMP-PNP in the structure of the shorter CDK12715–1038 construct, further highlighting the importance of the αK extension.
Perhaps as a result of these varied features, other subtle differences are also observed across the available CDK12 structures. Overall, the nucleotide-bound chains show a more closed conformation of the ATP pocket due to the tighter packing of their glycine-rich loop (Fig. 2b). Closer packing of the αC helix is also observed in the CDK12715–1052 chains resulting in a subtle twist in their N-terminal lobe (Fig. 2b) and a small shift in the position of the bound cyclin (Fig. 2a). The structure of the CycK appears rigid and is essentially unchanged from the unbound protein33. Differences are observed only for the N and C-termini as well as a flexible region centred on the H4’ helix in the second cyclin box (Fig. 2c).
Structural features of the active CDK12 kinase domain
The CDK12 chains display an active conformation of the kinase domain consistent with their cyclin interaction and their phosphorylation at the activation loop residue Thr893 (Fig. 3a). The correct positioning of the αC helix in the AMP-PNP-bound structure is confirmed by the canonical salt bridge formed between the catalytic residues Lys756 (β3) and Glu774 (αC) (not shown). A hydrophobic regulatory spine is also established across the N and C-terminal lobes by CDK12 residues Leu778, Met789, His857 and Phe878 (Fig. 3b). Phosphorylation on Thr893 additionally stabilizes both the activation and catalytic loops through hydrogen bond interactions with Arg882 and Arg858, respectively (Fig. 3c). Arg882 is one of eight deleterious CDK12 mutations identified in ovarian cancer (Fig. 3d)28. Its mutation to leucine significantly impairs kinase activity29 and is predicted to break critical interactions between phospho-Thr893 and the activation loop.
Interactions in the CDK12/CycK interface
Overall, the binding of CDK12 and CycK fits the model of the transcriptional CDKs first established by the structure of the CDK9/CycT1 complex34. As expected for this CDK class, interactions in the protein-protein interface are limited to the kinase N-lobe and the first cyclin box motif (Fig. 2a). The new structures reveal a large β4-β5 loop, which forms a notable insertion in CDK12 and contributes additionally to the overall binding surface area (Fig. 4a). The β4-β5 loop sits atop CycK where it inserts CDK12 Phe802 into a nest of hydrophobic residues, including Val142, Val143 and Ile146 from CycK H5. This packing is further stabilized by the intervening CycK residue Arg145, which adopts two alternative rotamers in the asymmetric unit to hydrogen bond with CDK12 Thr794 or Gly807, respectively (Fig. 4a). Such heterogeneity likely reflects the intrinsic flexibility of the β4-β5 loop, which has few additional interactions except for crystal packing contacts. Below the β4-β5 loop the CDK12 ‘PITAIRE’ helix (αC) packs between CycK helices H3 and H5 (Fig. 4b). Here, the core of the protein-protein interface is hydrophobic with contributions from the kinase N-terminus (Trp719) as well as the αC and surrounding β-sheet (Fig. 4b). Beyond the hydrophobic core there are a number of electrostatic interactions that make up the periphery of the binding interface, including a salt bridge between CDK12 Arg773 (αC) and CycK Glu108 (H3) (Fig. 4c).
Conformational plasticity of the C-terminal kinase extension
An unexpected feature of the CDK12715–1052/CycK11–267 complex structure is the conformational plasticity of the C-terminal kinase extension. The conformation of the two CDK12 molecules in the asymmetric unit diverges following Leu1025, which packs against the αE helix at the back of the kinase domain (Fig. 5a). The AMP-PNP-bound complex adopts a similar conformation to that reported previously by Bösken et al.22 In these structures, the C-terminal kinase extension wraps around the front of the ATP pocket where it runs parallel to the β6 strand before turning away in a perpendicular direction (Fig. 5a). By contrast, the C-terminus in the second CDK12 complex continues a path across the back of the kinase domain to pack within 4.3 Å of the bound CycK subunit (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, the αK helix, encompassing residues 1040-HELWS-1044, is formed in both CDK12 conformations suggesting that this secondary structural element is stably folded (Fig. 5b).
The C-terminal kinase extension has been shown to be critical for CDK12 activity22. When engaged by the ATP pocket this element acts to enclose the bound AMP-PNP molecule adding significantly to the pocket surface area (Fig. 5c). As well as contacts by His1040 and Glu1041 to the AMP-PNP moiety, there are stabilizing interactions with the kinase hinge region, including a hydrogen bond between Asp1038 and the hinge residue Tyr815 (Fig. 5d). Van de Waals interactions with the N-lobe β1 strand are additionally established by both His1040 and Leu1042. Finally, there are hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions with the C-lobe, including a hydrogen bond between the main chain amide of Glu1041 and side chain of Asp819. The current work also extends the visible structure to the polybasic tail region comprising 1045-KKRRRQ-1050, which forms a putative flexible interaction site for capture of the CTD substrate.
Full length CDK12/CycK is required for maximal activity
In vitro kinase assays using a GST-CTD substrate were performed to compare the activities of the crystallised CDK12/CycK complexes against the full length proteins. The activity of the full length CDK12/CycK1 complex was comparable to that of the equivalent CDK9/CycT1 complex (Fig. 6). By contrast, the complex comprising CDK12715–1052 exhibited a 10-fold reduction in activity, while the activity of the CDK12715–1038 truncation was severely diminished (Fig. 6). Additional kinetic analyses were performed to further understand the effects of the CDK12 truncation (Fig. 7). The determined Km values for ATP were in the typical range for protein kinases. However, the full length CDK12/CycK1 complex exhibited a KmATP value of 2 μM that was notably improved relative to the CDK12715–1052/CycK11–267 complex, which had a KmATP of 25 μM (Fig. 7a,b). Similar differences in respective binding were observed for the CTD substrate. Whereas the full length complex showed a KmCTD value of 0.3 μM, the binding of the truncated CDK12715–1052 complex was poorer with a KmCTD value of 2 μM (Fig. 7c–d). These differences suggest that other domains within the full length proteins make important contributions to the substrate interactions.
Discussion
The structures provide three different snapshots of the CDK12/CycK complex in its phosphorylated active configuration. The most significant conformational changes occur in the C-terminal kinase extension, which features a large flexible linker followed by the unusual αK helix. Plasticity in this region is consistent with earlier observations for CDK935. This CTD-directed kinase contains a C-terminal tail that folds similarly across the ATP-binding site, although it displays a distinct αK position. Flexibility in this tail has been suggested to facilitate the successive opening and closing of the ATP pocket to allow for cycles of ADP release and ATP capture35. Indeed, AMP-PNP was stably bound in our CDK12 structures only when trapped by the αK, while the capacity for this helix to transiently dissociate was illustrated by the folding of the other CDK12 chains. In the current crystal form, the dissociated linker and αK were folded across the back of the kinase domain in a manner reminiscent of the MAP kinases36. However, the limited number of specific contacts suggests that this region may be free in solution to explore multiple conformations. It would be of interest to investigate these motions in future by molecular dynamics simulations.
The CDK12 kinase acts late in the transcriptional cycle and is expected to engage a negatively charged CTD substrate22. The final C-terminal positions in the CDK12715–1052 structure form a polybasic cluster that is also loosely conserved in CDK9. The folding of the C-terminal extension across the ATP pocket is therefore also hypothesized as an adaptation to support the recruitment of the CTD substrate by provision of a complementary charged surface22,35. Dynamic movement of the C-terminus may also promote recruitment by increasing the potential search space for protein-protein interactions. Further biochemical and structural analyses are required to validate these hypotheses.
It is also striking that our truncated CDK12/CycK complexes are significantly less active than the full length proteins. Thus, there must be additional roles for other domains and likely also for other proteins in the cell. Notably, CDK12 contains multiple arginine-serine-rich (RS) motifs that may facilitate the recruitment of RNA processing factors for the coupling of transcription and RNA splicing. Proline-rich motifs (PRMs) are also identified in both CDK12 and CycK that may form recognition sites for SH3 or WW domain adaptors. It may be expected that a multiprotein CDK12/CycK complex will remain closely associated with the CTD to allow for the successive phosphorylation of multiple heptad repeats.
The CDK12/CycK structures also reveal further details of this most critical protein-protein interaction. The cyclin binding interface of the transcriptional CDKs is notably smaller than those regulating the cell cycle. We observe that this loss is offset slightly in CDK12 by an unusual β4-β5 loop insertion that packs atop the H5 helix of the first cyclin box motif. Moreover, this loop is conserved in the CDK13 kinase domain, which also binds to the CycK protein. However, a key interaction missing in the transcriptional CDK class is a contact between the cyclin and the kinase activation segment. Indeed, the cyclin interaction in these kinases is restricted to the kinase N-lobe. Structural studies of the CDK9/CycT1 complex have revealed that these interactions are instead mediated by other accessory proteins that direct kinase activity, such as HIV-1 Tat37. In this quaternary complex, the Tat protein contacts both the CDK9 and CycT1 subunits and modulates their protein-protein interaction. The kinase activation segment in CDK12 is similarly exposed and available to bind other partners. It will be interesting to discover if any such factors are identified that parallel the CDK9 interaction of HIV-1 Tat.
Overall, this work extends our understanding of the structural mechanisms that determine the activity of the CDK12/CycK complex. Further, it emphasizes the importance of protein flexibility as well as the contribution of regulatory elements outside the core catalytic domains. Finally, the packing of the αK helix offers a novel ATP pocket environment for the design of specific inhibitors targeting this important kinase in the DNA-damage response.
Methods
Cloning
For structural studies, various constructs of human CDK12 (Uniprot Q9NYV4), human CycK (Uniprot O75909) and human CycL1 (Uniprot Q9UK58) were cloned into the baculoviral transfer vector pFB-LIC-Bse by ligation-independent cloning. The vector encodes an N-terminal hexahistidine tag and a Tobacco Etch Virus Protease A (TEV) cleavage site. Bacmid DNA was prepared from Escherichia coli strain DH10Bac and used to generate baculovirus in Sf9 insect cells. Full length CDK12 Isoform 1 (NM_016507.2) and CycK115 were cloned into pDONR221 and recombined into bacmids using the Invitrogen Baculovirus Expression System with Gateway Technology. The full length proteins were N-terminally tagged with GST or 6xHis epitopes prior to bacmid generation as per manufacturer’s conditions (Invitrogen pDEST10 and pDEST20 vectors).
Protein expression and purification
Baculovirus for different CDK12 and cyclin constructs were used to co-infect Sf9 cells grown in suspension to a density of 2 × 106 cells/mL. For small scale testing, 3 mL cultures were grown using a 24-well block and harvested 72 hours post-infection. Cells were lysed by sonication in binding buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 mM Imidazole, 0.5 mM TCEP) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail set III (Calbiochem) and the lysate clarified by centrifugation. The expressed proteins were purified using nickel-sepharose resin (GE Healthcare) and analysed by SDS PAGE. Proteins for crystallisation were expressed similarly at the 1L scale. After sonication, polyethylenimine was added to a final concentration of 0.15% to precipitate DNA and the cell lysate clarified by centrifugation at 21,000 RPM for 1 hour at 4 °C. CDK12/CycK complexes were purified initially using nickel-sepharose chromatography (GE Healthcare) and eluted stepwise with imidazole before tag cleavage with TEV protease. Complexes containing CDK12715–1038 were additionally phosphorylated using recombinant Cak1 from Candida albicans. For final clean up, proteins underwent reverse nickel-affinity purification as well as size exclusion chromatography using a HiLoad Superdex S75 26/60 column (GE Healthcare) buffered in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl and 1 mM TCEP.
For expression of the full length CDK12/CycK1 complex, baculoviruses for the epitope-tagged CDK12 and CycK1 were co-infected at a ratio of 4:1 and incubated at 28 °C with shaking at 150 rpm. Cells were harvested 48–72 hours post infection. The full length protein complexes were purified by tandem affinity chromatography using either combinations of 6xHis-CDK12/GST-CycK1 or GST-CDK12/6xHis-CycK1. Cell pellets were resuspended in CDK lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM NaF, 0.2% v/v NP-40 and EDTA-free complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche))38. The lysate was incubated on ice for 30 minutes with an additional 0.5 M NaCl and occasional manual mixing. Lysate was then subjected to sonication and clarified by centrifugation. Proteins were captured overnight at 4 °C using Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) that was pre-equilibrated with CDK equilibrium buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, EDTA-free complete protease inhibitor cocktail). The Ni-NTA agarose was washed 3× with CDK equilibration buffer and the bead slurry transferred to a disposable column for step-wise elution using CDK equilibration buffer supplemented with 15, 25, 100 and 200 mM imidazole. The eluted protein complexes were dialyzed overnight against CDK activation buffer (12.5 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 5 mM β-glycerolphosphate, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM DTT, 0.01% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, EDTA-free complete protease inhibitor cocktail) to facilitate buffer exchange and removal of imidazole. The protein was concentrated using an Amicon filtration device with a 30 KDa molecular weight cut-off and the retentate was incubated with 500 μM ATP at 30 °C for 1 hour to allow auto-activation of the CDK12 kinase. Subsequently, the proteins were further purified using glutathione agarose beads (Pierce). Following overnight batch binding at 4 °C, the beads were washed 4x with CDK activation buffer and the bead slurry transferred to a disposable column. Bound protein was eluted in a step-wise fashion with elution buffers (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.04% Triton X-100, 4 mM DTT) supplemented with 10 mM and 20 mM glutathione. The purity of the eluted fractions was confirmed by SDS-PAGE or Western blotting before storage at −80 °C in 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.02% Triton X-100, 2 mM DTT, 50% glycerol. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay.
Kinase assays
Kinase assays were performed as described previously15. In brief, purified CDK complexes were incubated in kinase assay buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1% v/v NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 20 μM β-glycerophosphate, EDTA-free complete protease inhibitor cocktail) with varying amounts of cold ATP/ [γ-32 P]ATP and GST-CTD substrate which contains all 52 heptad repeats of human RNA Pol II C-terminal domain15. Reactions were incubated in a circulating 30 °C water bath for 15, 30 or 60 minutes. Kinase reactions were stopped with the addition of 6× SDS-PAGE loading dye. Samples were heated at 85 °C for 5 minutes and resolved by 4–12% SDS-PAGE. Gels were subsequently dried on 3 MM Whatmann paper and imaged with a FujiFilm FLA-7000 scanner. Phosphorylated bands were quantified using FujiFilm MultiGauge™ software.
Mass spectrometry
Protein masses were determined using an Agilent LC/MSD TOF system with reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization and an orthogonal time-of-flight mass analyser. Proteins were desalted prior to mass spectrometry by rapid elution off a C3 column with a gradient of 5–95% isopropanol in water with 0.1% formic acid. Spectra were analysed using the MassHunter software (Agilent).
Crystallisation
The CDK12715–1038/cyclin K11–267 complex was buffered in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 mM imidazole, 0.5 mM TCEP, 10 mM DTT and concentrated to 4.3 mg/mL. The non-hydrolyzable ATP analogue, adenylyl imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP) was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. Crystals were grown at 4 °C in 150 nL sitting drops mixing 100 nL protein solution with 50 nL of a reservoir solution comprising 20% PEG3350, 0.1 M Bis-tris propane pH 6.5, 0.2 M sodium nitrate, 10% ethylene glycol and 1 mM MgCl2. Before mounting, crystals were cryo-protected with mother liquor supplemented with an additional 15% ethylene glycol and vitrified in liquid nitrogen. The CDK12715–1052/cyclin K11–267 complex was buffered in 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM L-arginine, 5 mM L-glutamate and concentrated to 6 mg/mL. The ATP analogue AMP-PNP was added to a final concentration of 1 mM together with 5 mM MgCl2. Crystals were grown at 20 °C in 150 nL sitting drops mixing 50 nL protein solution with 100 nL of a reservoir solution comprising 20% PEG3350, 150 mM DL-malic acid. Before mounting, the crystals were cryo-protected with mother liquor supplemented with an additional 15% ethylene glycol, 3 mM AMP-PNP, 5 mM MgCl2 and vitrified in liquid nitrogen.
Structure determination
Diffraction data were collected at 100 K on Diamond Light Source beamline I24 for the CDK12715–1038/cyclin K11–267 complex and beamline I02 for the CDK12715–1052/cyclin K11–267 complex. Data were indexed and integrated using XDS39 and scaled using AIMLESS40 in the CCP4 suite of programs41. Phases were found using molecular replacement in PHASER42 and search models generated by CHAINSAW43. The structures of CDK9 (PDB ID: 4BCG)32 and cyclin K (PDB ID: 2I53)33 were used as search models for the CDK12715–1038/cyclin K11–267 complex. The resulting CDK12 and cyclin K structures were then used as search models for the CDK12715–1052/cyclin K11–267 complex. Models were built initially using COOT44 and then refined and modified using alternate rounds of REFMAC545 and COOT, with the later rounds of refinement in PHENIX46. The refined structures were validated with MolProbity47 and the atomic coordinate files deposited in the Protein Data Bank. Structure figures were prepared with PyMOL48.
Additional Information
Accession codes: Atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession numbers PDB ID: 4UN0 and PDB ID: 4CXA.
How to cite this article: Dixon-Clarke, S. E. et al. Structures of the CDK12/CycK complex with AMP-PNP reveal a flexible C-terminal kinase extension important for ATP binding. Sci. Rep. 5, 17122; doi: 10.1038/srep17122 (2015).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Diamond Light Source for beamtime (proposal mx8421), as well as Ashley Pike, Apirat Chaikuad and the staff of beamlines I02 and I24 for assistance with crystal testing and data collection. S.E.D.-C. is supported by a NDM Prize Studentship, which is funded by both the Medical Research Council and the Nuffield Department of Medicine. The SGC is a registered charity (no. 1097737) that receives funds from AbbVie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute Grant OGI-055, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly Canada, the Novartis Research Foundation, the Ontario Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation, Pfizer, Takeda, and Wellcome Trust Grant 092809/Z/10/Z. G.B.M. acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
Footnotes
Author Contributions All authors contributed to writing and reviewed the manuscript. S.E.D.-C. and J.M.E. undertook the structural work. S.-W.G.C. performed the kinase assays.
References
- Malumbres M. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases: a family portrait. Nat Cell Biol 11, 1275–6 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim S. & Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development 140, 3079–93 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolcevic P. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 16/PCTAIRE kinase 1 is activated by cyclin Y and is essential for spermatogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 32, 868–79 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson G. et al. Cell cycle control of wnt receptor activation. Dev Cell 17, 788–99 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikolcevic P., Rainer J. & Geley S. Orphan kinases turn eccentric: a new class of cyclin Y-activated, membrane-targeted CDKs. Cell Cycle 11, 3758–68 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans T., Rosenthal E. T., Youngblom J., Distel D. & Hunt T. Cyclin: a protein specified by maternal mRNA in sea urchin eggs that is destroyed at each cleavage division. Cell 33, 389–96 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown N. R., Noble M. E., Endicott J. A. & Johnson L. N. The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat Cell Biol 1, 438–43 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown N. R. et al. Cyclin B and cyclin A confer different substrate recognition properties on CDK2. Cell Cycle 6, 1350–9 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulman B. A., Lindstrom D. L. & Harlow E. Substrate recruitment to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by a multipurpose docking site on cyclin A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 10453–8 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher R. P. & Morgan D. O. A novel cyclin associates with MO15/CDK7 to form the CDK-activating kinase. Cell 78, 713–24 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Makela T. P. et al. A cyclin associated with the CDK-activating kinase MO15. Nature 371, 254–7 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko T. K., Kelly E. & Pines J. CrkRS: a novel conserved Cdc2-related protein kinase that colocalises with SC35 speckles. J Cell Sci 114, 2591–603 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marques F. et al. A new subfamily of high molecular mass CDC2-related kinases with PITAI/VRE motifs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279, 832–7 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Even Y. et al. CDC2L5, a Cdk-like kinase with RS domain, interacts with the ASF/SF2-associated protein p32 and affects splicing in vivo. J Cell Biochem 99, 890–904 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng S. W. et al. Interaction of cyclin-dependent kinase 12/CrkRS with cyclin K1 is required for the phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 32, 4691–704 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blazek D. et al. The Cyclin K/Cdk12 complex maintains genomic stability via regulation of expression of DNA damage response genes. Genes Dev 25, 2158–72 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartkowiak B. et al. CDK12 is a transcription elongation-associated CTD kinase, the metazoan ortholog of yeast Ctk1. Genes Dev 24, 2303–16 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kohoutek J. & Blazek D. Cyclin K goes with Cdk12 and Cdk13. Cell Div 7, 12 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buratowski S. Progression through the RNA polymerase II CTD cycle. Mol Cell 36, 541–6 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuda N. J., Ardehali M. B. & Lis J. T. Defining mechanisms that regulate RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nature 461, 186–92 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowman E. A. & Kelly W. G. RNA polymerase II transcription elongation and Pol II CTD Ser2 phosphorylation: A tail of two kinases. Nucleus 5, 224–36 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bosken C. A. et al. The structure and substrate specificity of human Cdk12/Cyclin K. Nat Commun 5, 3505 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang K. et al. Characterization of human cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) and CDK13 complexes in C-terminal domain phosphorylation, gene transcription, and RNA processing. Mol Cell Biol 35, 928–38 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bartkowiak B. & Greenleaf A. L. Expression, purification, and identification of associated proteins of the full-length hCDK12/CyclinK complex. J Biol Chem 290, 1786–95 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidson L., Muniz L. & West S. 3′ end formation of pre-mRNA and phosphorylation of Ser2 on the RNA polymerase II CTD are reciprocally coupled in human cells. Genes Dev 28, 342–56 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eifler T. T. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 12 increases 3′ end processing of growth factor-induced c-FOS transcripts. Mol Cell Biol 35, 468–78 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen H. H., Wang Y. C. & Fann M. J. Identification and characterization of the CDK12/cyclin L1 complex involved in alternative splicing regulation. Mol Cell Biol 26, 2736–45 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474, 609–15 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joshi P. M., Sutor S. L., Huntoon C. J. & Karnitz L. M. Ovarian cancer-associated mutations disable catalytic activity of CDK12, a kinase that promotes homologous recombination repair and resistance to cisplatin and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. J Biol Chem 289, 9247–53 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ekumi K. M. et al. Ovarian carcinoma CDK12 mutations misregulate expression of DNA repair genes via deficient formation and function of the Cdk12/CycK complex. Nucleic Acids Res 43, 2575–89 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bajrami I. et al. Genome-wide profiling of genetic synthetic lethality identifies CDK12 as a novel determinant of PARP1/2 inhibitor sensitivity. Cancer Res 74, 287–97 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shao H. et al. Substituted 4-(thiazol-5-yl)-2-(phenylamino)pyrimidines are highly active CDK9 inhibitors: synthesis, X-ray crystal structures, structure-activity relationship, and anticancer activities. J Med Chem 56, 640–59 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baek K., Brown R. S., Birrane G. & Ladias J. A. Crystal structure of human cyclin K, a positive regulator of cyclin-dependent kinase 9. J Mol Biol 366, 563–73 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumli S. et al. The structure of P-TEFb (CDK9/cyclin T1), its complex with flavopiridol and regulation by phosphorylation. EMBO J 27, 1907–18 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baumli S., Hole A. J., Wang L. Z., Noble M. E. & Endicott J. A. The CDK9 tail determines the reaction pathway of positive transcription elongation factor b. Structure 20, 1788–95 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F., Strand A., Robbins D., Cobb M. H. & Goldsmith E. J. Atomic structure of the MAP kinase ERK2 at 2.3 A resolution. Nature 367, 704–11 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tahirov T. H. et al. Crystal structure of HIV-1 Tat complexed with human P-TEFb. Nature 465, 747–51 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinhero R., Liaw P. & Yankulov K. A uniform procedure for the purification of CDK7/CycH/MAT1, CDK8/CycC and CDK9/CycT1. Biol Proced Online 6, 163–172 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabsch W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 125–32 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans P. R. & Murshudov G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69, 1204–14 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winn M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67, 235–42 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCoy A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40, 658–674 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein N. CHAINSAW: a program for mutating pdb files used as templates in molecular replacement. J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 641–643 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W. G. & Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 486–501 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murshudov G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67, 355–67 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 12–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrödinger LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. (Version 1.2r3pre).