Skip to main content
Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America logoLink to Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
. 2015 Nov 23;61(Suppl 8):S837–S848. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ738

A Review of Evidence-Based Care of Symptomatic Trichomoniasis and Asymptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis Infections

Elissa Meites 1, Charlotte A Gaydos 2, Marcia M Hobbs 3, Patricia Kissinger 4, Paul Nyirjesy 5, Jane R Schwebke 6, W Evan Secor 7, Jack D Sobel 8, Kimberly A Workowski 1,9
PMCID: PMC4657597  PMID: 26602621

Abstract

Trichomonas vaginalis is the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection, affecting an estimated 3.7 million women and men in the United States. Health disparities are prominent in the epidemiology of this infection, which affects 11% of women aged ≥40 years and a disproportionately high percentage of black women. Particularly high prevalences have been identified among sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic patients and incarcerated individuals. This article reviews and updates scientific evidence in key topic areas used for the development of the 2015 STD Treatment Guidelines published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current evidence is presented regarding conditions associated with Trichomonas vaginalis infection, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and pregnancy complications such as preterm birth. Nucleic acid amplification tests and point-of-care tests are newly available diagnostic methods that can be conducted on a variety of specimens, potentially allowing highly sensitive testing and screening of both women and men at risk for infection. Usually, trichomoniasis can be cured with single-dose therapy of an appropriate nitroimidazole antibiotic, but women who are also infected with HIV should receive therapy for 7 days. Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging concern.

Keywords: Trichomonas vaginalis, Trichomonas infections, Trichomonas vaginitis, antitrichomonal agents, sexually transmitted diseases


Trichomonas vaginalis is a highly prevalent parasitic infection that causes the sexually transmitted disease (STD) trichomoniasis. Since 2008, when scientific evidence was systematically reviewed for the development of the 2010 STD Treatment Guidelines [1], additional data have been published regarding epidemiology, clinical manifestations, treatment, partner management, antimicrobial resistance, associated conditions (eg, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], pregnancy complications, and others), diagnostic methods, screening, reporting, and prevention of T. vaginalis infections and trichomoniasis. This article reviews current evidence in each of these key topic areas used for the development of the 2015 STD Treatment Guidelines published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

METHODS

A PubMed (US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health) search was conducted of all literature published between 25 September 2008 and 28 January 2013 using the search terms “Trichomonas” (508 articles), “Trichomonas vaginalis” (373 articles), “trichomoniasis” (472 articles), and “trich” (2 articles). The search was confined to human studies, without other limitations. In addition, the National Center for Biotechnology Information sent notifications of all publications with the key words “Trichomonas vaginalis” or “trichomoniasis” subsequent to the dates of the literature review. Abstracts were reviewed from relevant conferences (eg, STD Prevention Conference; Infectious Diseases Society of America; International Society for Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research; American Society for Microbiology; Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Infectious Diseases Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology) using the dates and search terms above.

Each abstract was reviewed, along with the full text of each pertinent article, to determine whether it contained data relevant to the 2015 CDC STD Treatment Guidelines. A total of 197 pertinent abstracts/articles were summarized and entered into tables of evidence. In addition, 9 subject matter experts were contacted to add their expertise to the guidelines. Tables of evidence were used to inform the responses to key questions regarding clinical management of trichomoniasis and T. vaginalis infections. Additional unpublished data of which the experts were aware were added to the tables, with permission of the researchers. Findings were summarized, including published relative risks (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations

Trichomonas vaginalis is the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States, causing an estimated 3.7 million prevalent infections (including 2.3 million among women and 1.4 million among men), and 1.1 million incident infections annually (including 680 000 among women and 415 000 among men) [2]. These estimates are based on nationally representative samples of the civilian noninstitutionalized population in the 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which projected that 3.1% of US women of reproductive age are infected [3]. Trichomonas vaginalis parasites preferentially infect the urethra in men and women, and vaginal and vulvar sites in women.

Health disparities are prominent in the epidemiology of this infection, including disparities by age and by race/ethnicity. In a nationally representative sample of 12 449 adolescents in school grades 7–12, the prevalence among US adolescents was estimated to be 2.8% among females and 1.7% among males [4]. A study of US female adolescents aged 12–18 years found that T. vaginalis incidence was 1.3 per 100 person-months among 257 HIV-infected adolescents, and 0.6 per 100 person-months among 142 HIV-uninfected adolescents (P = .002) [5]. Other studies have found that the prevalence of T. vaginalis infection can increase with age, peaking at >11% among women aged ≥40 years [3, 6]. In NHANES, the prevalence of infection among non-Hispanic black women was 13.3%, significantly higher than the 1.8% prevalence among Mexican-American women or the 1.3% prevalence among non-Hispanic white women [3].

Particularly high prevalences have been detected among incarcerated individuals, at 9%–32% among incarcerated women [610] and 2%–9% among incarcerated men [7, 1113], using a variety of specimens and diagnostic testing methods. One study among pregnant incarcerated women found an extremely high prevalence of 47% [11]. Prevalence of infection also has been found to be high among STD clinic patients, at 26% of symptomatic women tested [14]. Among women using drugs (including recent heroin, crack or other cocaine, or daily marijuana), prevalence ranges from 13% to 38% [1517].

Few studies have evaluated rectal or oral infection. One study of 497 men and women reporting receptive anal intercourse detected a rectal prevalence of 5.2% (26/497) by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) at clinical sites in Pittsburgh [18]. A study of remnant rectal specimens from 500 men who have sex with men (MSM) attending a San Francisco STD clinic found a prevalence of 0.6% (3/500) by NAAT [19]. A cohort study of 365 HIV-infected MSM in primary care in 4 cities reported zero prevalent and zero incident T. vaginalis infections at 6 months, using in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on centrifuged urine [20]. No population-based studies have investigated trichomoniasis in oropharyngeal sites, although T. vaginalis has been reported as a cause of purulent sinusitis in at least 1 critically ill patient [21]. It is unclear whether the rectum or the oral cavity can be a reservoir for T. vaginalis parasites, or whether this occasional finding might reflect recent deposition of organism during receptive anal or oral sex.

Two studies have evaluated the urethral prevalence of T. vaginalis infection among MSM; in both studies, the prevalence detected by an in-house PCR test on urine specimens was negligible [20, 22].

Treatment

Medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of trichomoniasis include metronidazole (since 1963) and tinidazole (since 2004). Standard therapy consists of either metronidazole or tinidazole in a single 2-g dose taken orally, or, if necessary, intravenously. The CDC also recommends an alternative regimen of metronidazole 500 mg orally twice a day for 7 days. Tinidazole has a half-life of approximately 12.5 hours, compared with a half-life of 7.3 hours for metronidazole [23]. Furthermore, serum and genitourinary tract drug levels of tinidazole have been reported to be 1.4–2 times higher than those of metronidazole [24, 25]. In randomized controlled trials, demonstrated efficacy of tinidazole was equal or superior to that of metronidazole, with parasitologic cure rates of 86%–100% [2630]. However, tinidazole is approximately 10 times more expensive, with an approximate retail price of $44.66 per 2-g dose, compared with $3.47 per 2-g dose of metronidazole.

Both metronidazole and tinidazole are 5-nitroimidazoles, which is currently the only class of antimicrobial medications approved for effective treatment of trichomoniasis and T. vaginalis infections. Other nitroimidazoles, such as secnidazole and ornidazole, have been used as antiparasitic agents in other countries but have not been approved for use within the United States. An additional nitroimidazole called fexinidazole was evaluated favorably for toxicity and is under study in humans as a potential novel antiparasitic agent [31, 32]. A small randomized trial involving 60 women with symptomatic trichomoniasis in Brazil showed that a single 24-mg oral dose of peppermint herbal medication, Mentha crispa, performed similarly to a nitroimidazole in achieving a microbiologic and symptomatic cure according to wet mounts of vaginal fluid, as 97% of women in the nitroimidazole group were cured, compared with 90% of women in the Mentha crispa group (P = .6) [33].

Persistent or recurrent infection due to antimicrobial-resistant T. vaginalis or other causes should be distinguished from the possibility of reinfection from an untreated or insufficiently treated sex partner. The CDC's Division of STD Prevention and Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria have accumulated experience with testing and treatment of nitroimidazole-resistant T. vaginalis and can offer susceptibility testing and management recommendations upon request [34]. This issue is discussed in more detail below.

Following treatment failure, persistent or recurrent trichomoniasis has been treated successfully with longer courses or additional doses of the same medications used in standard therapy (eg, tinidazole 1 g twice daily for 2 weeks, plus tinidazole vaginal tablets 500 mg twice daily for 1 week) [35, 36]. In vitro data support the likelihood of efficacy with tinidazole following metronidazole treatment failure; although tinidazole is not more active than metronidazole against susceptible organisms, it is predictably more active against isolates demonstrating mild, moderate, or severe resistance [37]. Since there are currently no definitive data to guide treatment for partners of individuals with persistent or recurrent trichomoniasis, where reinfection or nonadherence are unlikely, it is suggested that partners should undergo evaluation and receive the same regimen as the patient.

Occasional individuals have serious adverse reactions to 5-nitroimidazoles. In a series of 127 T. vaginalis–infected women whose clinicians all consulted the CDC for suspected metronidazole hypersensitivity, reactions reported by the clinician included urticaria (48%), pruritus (16%), erythema (9%), facial edema (9%), gastrointestinal (7%), anaphylaxis (2%), and other (10%) [38]. Anecdotal experience indicates that urticarial adverse reactions do not always recur if therapy is repeated [39]. Of 15 women who received desensitization to metronidazole using a published oral or intravenous metronidazole desensitization regimen, all had eradication of their infection; 1 woman who received the oral regimen experienced a pruritic rash on the final day (resolved with steroids) and 1 woman who received the intravenous regimen experienced mild urticaria and pruritus 45 minutes following the final 2-g dose (managed with antihistamines) [38]. It is not known why some individuals have adverse reactions upon reexposure while others do not.

Alternative treatment options are limited as no other FDA-approved therapies are available. Combination regimens have not been systematically evaluated. The most anecdotal experience has been with intravaginal paromomycin in combination with high-dose tinidazole. Case series and reports have reported successful treatment with agents including intravaginal paromomycin [35, 4042], intravaginal boric acid [43, 44], nitazoxanide [45], and intravaginal metronidazole/miconazole [46]. Toxicities are not high with any of these regimens, although painful vulvar ulcers can be an uncommon self-limited side effect of paromomycin. Other attempted treatments that have been reported with a <50% success rate include intravaginal betadine (povidone-iodine), clotrimazole, acetic acid, furazolidone, gentian violet, nonoxynol-9, and potassium permanganate. To date, no topical microbicide has shown an effect on trichomoniasis [47].

Partner Management

Infection is readily passed between sex partners during penile-vaginal sex, although partners may be unaware of their infection; a prospective multicenter study found that 72% of male sex partners of women with trichomoniasis were also infected with T. vaginalis, and 77% of these men were asymptomatic [48]. Treatment of all sexual partners can prevent recurrences in the index cases, reduce transmission, and prevent new cases in the community.

Several randomized trials have evaluated patient-delivered partner treatment (PDPT) for trichomoniasis. One trial evaluated partner notification strategies among 458 infected women and found that PDPT did not result in more partners taking the medicine nor lower repeat infection rates than standard notification, but PDPT was less costly and subjects were more likely to see their partners take the medication (P < .001) [49]. Patient counseling beyond standard of care in this trial may have dampened the effect. A more recent trial found that of 484 women tested, most infected women (80%) randomized to PDPT delivered the medicine, with no reported increase in serious adverse events; furthermore, compared with partner referral and disease intervention specialist notification groups combined, the PDPT group had a lower repeat infection rate at 1 month (5.8% vs 15% and 5.8% vs 12.5%, respectively) [50]. Also, 2 randomized trials of 463 women diagnosed with trichomoniasis and 977 men diagnosed with urethritis found that self-reported disclosure of T. vaginalis infection status to partners was more likely to occur among those randomized to PDPT [51].

Antimicrobial Resistance

In vitro resistance to metronidazole was observed shortly after this medication was first used to treat trichomoniasis, yet correlation with clinical outcomes is unclear, and other factors may play a role. In a study of 175 T. vaginalis isolates from women with persistent infections whose clinicians consulted the CDC for susceptibility testing after standard therapy failed at least twice, 115 (66%) demonstrated some level of metronidazole resistance: 56 (32%) were highly resistant, 24 (14%) isolates were moderately resistant, and 35 (20%) isolates were minimally resistant. For all isolates resistant to metronidazole, in vitro resistance to tinidazole was similar or lower [34].

Although antimicrobial-resistant T. vaginalis is not systematically assessed or reported at a national level, several studies have evaluated prevalence of metronidazole- or tinidazole-resistant T. vaginalis. A study of 178 isolates from STD clinic patients in Alabama found that 17 (9.6%) demonstrated metronidazole resistance and 1 (1.1%) demonstrated resistance to tinidazole [52]. Among adolescents, one study of 78 isolates from HIV-uninfected sexually active teens visiting an inner-city public primary care clinic found that 4 (5%) demonstrated metronidazole resistance and none demonstrated tinidazole resistance [53]. A prospective cohort of specimens from 538 women diagnosed with trichomoniasis at STD clinics in 6 cities found that 4.3% exhibited low-level metronidazole resistance in vitro and no isolates demonstrated tinidazole resistance [54]. Nationally, this prevalence corresponds to an estimated 159 000 people in the United States who might require treatment with an alternative to nitroimidazoles [55].

HIV Infection

The incidence of T. vaginalis infection is higher among HIV-infected individuals compared with those who are not HIV-infected [5]. Up to 52.6% of HIV-infected women have been found to be coinfected with T. vaginalis [17, 56]. Among HIV-infected women, T. vaginalis infection is significantly associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [57], and treatment of T. vaginalis infection is associated with significant decreases in genital tract viral load and vaginal HIV viral shedding [58, 59]. Among HIV-infected men, data are scant. Both HIV acquisition and transmission have been studied in relationship to T. vaginalis infection.

Trichomonas vaginalis infection is epidemiologically associated with HIV acquisition. A prospective study of 3297 African HIV-serodiscordant couples found that T. vaginalis infection is an independent risk factor for HIV acquisition; T. vaginalis infection of the female partner was associated with an increased per-act probability of her acquiring HIV during sex (OR, 2.57 [95% CI, 1.42–4.65]) [60]. Another prospective study of 4948 sexually active women in Zimbabwe and South Africa found that T. vaginalis–infected women were more likely to test positive for HIV at the following visit (adjusted HR [aHR], 2.05 [95% CI, 1.05–4.02]), and similarly, HIV-infected women were more likely to test positive for T. vaginalis at the following visit (aHR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.35–3.32]) [61]. Multivariate analysis of data from a nested case-control study conducted among 218 women with incident HIV infection and 419 controls in Uganda and Zimbabwe showed a significant association between receiving a diagnosis of T. vaginalis infection and subsequently testing positive for HIV infection at the following visit (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.74 [95% CI, 1.25–6.00]) [62]. In a prospective study of 1335 female sex workers in Kenya, T. vaginalis infection increased the risk of HIV acquisition in multivariate analysis (aOR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.04–2.24]) [63]. A mathematical model based on data from HIV-infected patients in North Carolina predicted that 0.062 HIV transmission events will occur per 100 HIV-infected women in the absence of T. vaginalis infection, and 0.076 HIV transmission events will occur if T. vaginalis is prevalent in 22% of the HIV-infected women; in the latter scenario, more than one-fifth (23%) of HIV transmission events from HIV-infected women are attributable to T. vaginalis infection [64].

Trichomonas vaginalis infection also has been associated with a potential for increased transmission of HIV. In a prospective cohort study of 557 HIV-infected women in South Africa, genital tract viral load decreased significantly 1 month after treatment with 2 g of oral metronidazole [58]. A prospective study of 58 T. vaginalis–infected women in Louisiana matched with 92 T. vaginalis–uninfected controls showed that T. vaginalis–infected women who were effectively treated for T. vaginalis infection were less likely to shed HIV vaginally at 3 months posttreatment compared with baseline (RR, 0.34 [95% CI, .12–.92]), while there was no change for T. vaginalis–uninfected women [59]. A study of 1187 HIV-infected men in Malawi showed that the rate of HIV positivity was not different across T. vaginalis infection status, but men with T. vaginalis infection demonstrated increased seminal plasma HIV RNA concentrations (P = .02) [65]. In a cross-sectional study of 336 HIV-infected men with genital ulcer disease at primary health clinics in South America, 43 (13%) were infected with T. vaginalis; these men had higher ulcer viral loads on average than did those without T. vaginalis infection, but the difference was not significant (mean difference, 0.62 [95% CI, .07–1.2]) [66].

Few studies have evaluated the management of trichomoniasis among HIV-infected women; factors that may interfere with standard single-dose treatment for trichomoniasis in these women include high rates of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis (BV) coinfections, use of antiretroviral therapy, changes in vaginal ecology, and impaired immunity [67, 68]. A 2003 cross-sectional study in South Africa found that among 692 symptomatic women receiving syndromic treatment including a single 2-g dose of metronidazole, microbiologic cure rates for T. vaginalis did not vary significantly by HIV status [69]. More recently, however, a randomized trial of 270 HIV-infected women receiving care at public HIV clinics in the southern United States randomized participants to receive metronidazole for either a standard single dose (2 g once) or a week-long regimen (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Women randomized to the week-long regimen were significantly more likely to be cured of T. vaginalis at 6–12 days following medication completion (T. vaginalis prevalence of 8.5% in week-long regimen arm vs 16.8% in single-dose arm: RR, 0.50 [95% CI, .25–1.00]; P = .045) and at 3 months (11.0% in the week-long regimen arm vs 24.1% in the single-dose arm; RR, 0.46 [95% CI, .21–.98]; P = .03); the lack of single-dose treatment efficacy was found only among women with asymptomatic BV, and there was no significant difference in partner treatment between the 2 arms [70]. Further analysis of 244 of these women found that participants reported a high adherence to PDPT (75.4% provided PDPT to all partners and 61.7% reported they were sure all of their partners took the medication). Of the 24 repeat infections 6–12 days following treatment, adherence to medication and no sexual exposure were reported in 21 (87.5%), indicating that failure of the standard treatment was the most common probable cause of recurrent infection [71].

Pregnancy

Several studies have investigated the implications of maternal T. vaginalis infection during pregnancy; the most established association is with preterm delivery. A prospective cohort study of 13 816 pregnant women in 5 US cities found that T. vaginalis infection at midgestation was significantly associated with low birth weight (aOR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1–1.5]), preterm delivery (aOR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1–1.4]), and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant (aOR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.1–1.6]) [72]. A large retrospective study of administrative data from 108 346 pregnant women with Medicaid in South Carolina found that women diagnosed with trichomoniasis in the first 7 months of pregnancy were more likely to deliver very preterm (≤33 weeks) infants (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02–1.46]), and those diagnosed in the first 8 months of pregnancy were more likely to deliver late preterm (33–36 weeks) infants (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18–2.14]) [73]. Further study is urgently needed to determine whether treatment of trichomoniasis during pregnancy can reduce such complications.

Other analyses of ecological data from pregnant women in the South Carolina Medicaid population, along with linked administrative data from the South Carolina Department of Education and the Department of Disabilities and Special Needs, found associations between maternal trichomoniasis during pregnancy and having a child who was later diagnosed with intellectual disability (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.12–1.46]) or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (OR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.23–1.35]), although biological mechanisms were unclear [74, 75].

Perinatal transmission of trichomoniasis is believed to be rare, as few cases of trichomoniasis have been reported in premature newborns [76, 77]. However, a study of 479 HIV-infected pregnant women in Zimbabwe reported that vaginal infections including T. vaginalis were significant predictors of HIV vertical transmission in multivariate analysis (RR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.03–2.88]) [78].

Metronidazole crosses the placenta and is classified as pregnancy class B by the FDA; although it is positive in the Ames test in vitro, studies in humans and other animals have shown no evidence of fetotoxicity at any stage of pregnancy. In pregnant rats, studies of doses up to 5 times the human dose revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to metronidazole. In pregnant mice, no fetotoxicity was observed when metronidazole was administered orally at 20 mg/kg/day [79]. A large population-based dataset from the Hungarian Congenital Abnormality Registry assessed use of metronidazole during pregnancy for 17 300 women who had offspring with congenital abnormalities and 30 663 women whose offspring did not, and found no association between metronidazole use and congenital abnormalities [80]. Also reassuringly, a retrospective cohort study of 2829 pregnant women delivering at a major teaching hospital in Syracuse, New York, found no association between metronidazole use during any trimester of pregnancy with any adverse outcomes (preterm birth, low birth weight, or congenital anomalies) [81]. However, adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women are lacking.

Various cross-sectional and cohort studies have investigated the effects of metronidazole for pregnant women with trichomoniasis. In the largest study to date, a retrospective study of Medicaid billing data and birth certificate records from 144 737 pregnant women delivering in South Carolina, metronidazole treatment was found to be protective against preterm delivery, both among women with another genitourinary infection at some point during pregnancy (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, .50–.95]) and those without (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, .52–.92]) [82]. A Cochrane review of data from 2 trials involving a combined 842 pregnant women concluded that metronidazole, given as a single dose, is effective against trichomoniasis (both trials showed high rates of parasitological cure, around 90%, following treatment), although effect on pregnancy outcome was not clear [83]. A large randomized trial of 2428 pregnant women randomized to receive both metronidazole and erythromycin (both 250 mg 3 times a day for 7 days) or placebo found that women randomized to receive antibiotics were more likely to have resolution of trichomoniasis compared with women who received placebo, yet no significant differences were detected in birth weights [84]. A double-blinded placebo-controlled trial involving 2098 HIV-infected and 335 HIV-uninfected pregnant women in Zambia, Malawi, and Tanzania found no significant difference in gestational age of the infants of women randomized to receive antibiotics even after stratification by HIV status [85].

Metronidazole is secreted in breast milk. Although there was no evidence of adverse effects in infants in several case series, some clinicians advise deferring breastfeeding for 12–24 hours following maternal treatment with a 2-g dose of metronidazole [86]. Lower doses produce a lower concentration in breast milk and are considered compatible with breastfeeding over longer periods [87, 88].

Tinidazole is currently classified as pregnancy category C, given reproduction studies in animals suggesting some mutagenic potential. There are few data on tinidazole use by pregnant or breastfeeding women. A study of data from the Hungarian Congenital Abnormality Registry demonstrated no higher rate of congenital abnormalities among children born to mothers who had received oral tinidazole during pregnancy (10/22 843 cases vs 16/38 151 controls; OR, 1.0 [95% CI, .7–1.3]) [89].

Other Associated Conditions

Bacterial Vaginosis

Symptomatic trichomoniasis may occur in the context of a disruption of vaginal flora, on a spectrum with fewer lactobacilli than normal yet more than BV [90, 91]. In a randomized trial of intravaginal metronidazole gel involving 107 women with asymptomatic BV presenting to an STD clinic in Alabama, women in the treatment group had a significantly longer time to STD development overall (P = .02); however, this difference was driven by a reduction in chlamydia and there was no significant difference in the incidence of trichomoniasis over 12 months, with 16 new T. vaginalis infections in the treatment group and 22 new T. vaginalis infections in the observation group [92]. Among HIV-infected women, 1 study has examined the effect of BV on the response to T. vaginalis treatment. In a randomized trial of 244 HIV-infected women with T. vaginalis coinfection receiving metronidazole for either a standard single dose (2 g once) or a week-long regimen (500 mg twice daily for 7 days), the rate of BV was 66.8%, and BV was associated with early failure of the single-dose treatment for T. vaginalis infection, although differences did not persist at 3 months [93].

Nongonococcal Urethritis

Trichomonas vaginalis infection in men is often asymptomatic, but in a study of 355 infected men at a Baltimore STD clinic, 47% reported discharge and 22% reported dysuria [94]. Among men with symptoms of urethritis, the reported prevalence of T. vaginalis infection ranges from 3% to 17% in US STD clinics, varying by specimen type and assay sensitivity [9598]. Although these observations suggest a need for testing and treatment among men for this pathogen, especially in STD clinics, urethritis on Gram stain does not appear to be associated with T. vaginalis infection as diagnosed by PCR [98, 99]. In a placebo-controlled trial of 411 men in Malawi, adding metronidazole to an antibiotic regimen for empiric treatment of urethritis did not improve symptom resolution [100]. In addition, a randomized controlled trial of heterosexual men with nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) at STD clinics in 4 cities found that addition of a single 2-g dose of tinidazole to the treatment regimen for NGU (doxycycline or azithromycin) effectively eradicated T. vaginalis infections but did not result in higher NGU cure rates [96, 97].

Other Sexually Transmitted Infections

In addition to its association with HIV, T. vaginalis infection has been linked with various other STIs, although it can be challenging to sort out the influence of confounding factors such as sexual behavior or changing diagnostic test methods. In a nationally representative sample of women participating in NHANES, 6 other STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, herpes simplex virus type 1 [HSV-1], herpes simplex virus type 2 [HSV-2], syphilis, and HIV) were all more common among women with a positive test for T. vaginalis. However, after adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and recent sexual partners, only HSV-1 (RR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.09–1.34]) and HSV-2 (RR, 1.51 [95% CI, 2.32–3.23]) were significantly associated with T. vaginalis infection [101].

Endometritis and Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

It has not been clearly established whether T. vaginalis infection causes endometritis or PID. Among 696 women at an STD clinic in South Africa, patients with trichomoniasis had a significantly higher risk of PID than did women without trichomoniasis (P = .03). However, after stratification by HIV status, the association between T. vaginalis infection and PID was significant only among HIV-infected women (RR, 1.9; P = .002) [57]. Furthermore, a study of 736 women with risk factors for PID in Pittsburgh found that women with T. vaginalis infection at enrollment were more likely to develop acute endometritis (19/82 [23%]; P = .001), but not fallopian tube obstruction [102].

Infertility

Trichomoniasis could plausibly interfere with male and female fertility, although few studies have been conducted to investigate this potential connection. Among men, an in vitro study showed that T. vaginalis parasites can adhere to, immobilize, and phagocytose sperm cells [103]. A Turkish study found that among 80 infertile men, 2.5% had a positive T. vaginalis test by PCR, but serology was not available [104]. Among women, a study of 321 women with tubal infertility in Seattle found that the RR of tubal infertility was significantly higher among women who self-reported a history of trichomoniasis (adjusted RR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1–2.6]) [105].

Prostate Cancer and Prostatitis

Three studies have evaluated the link between trichomoniasis and prostate cancer. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study, a case-control study of 691 men with prostate cancer, showed that 13% of men with prostate cancer and 9% of controls had serologic evidence of T. vaginalis infection (aOR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.00–2.03]) [106]. The Physician's Health Study, a case-control study of 673 men with prostate cancer, linked T. vaginalis seropositivity with increased risks of both extraprostatic prostate cancer (OR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.08–4.37]), and cancer that would ultimately progress to bony metastases or prostate cancer–specific death (OR, 2.69 [95% CI, 1.37–5.28]) [107]. However, among 616 men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, the odds of prostate cancer were not significantly higher among men with high seropositivity (OR, 0.97 [95% CI, .70–1.34]), nor significantly lower among men with low seropositivity (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, .63–1.09]). Of note, nearly half (47%) of the men with prostate cancer in this study were diagnosed by study investigators by end-of-study biopsy, before these early-stage lesions could produce any symptoms or abnormal screening tests [108].

One randomized trial of 61 men in Croatia with prostatitis thought to be caused by trichomoniasis reported a higher percentage of both clinical cure (96.7% vs 67.7%; P = .006) and T. vaginalis eradication (93.3% vs 71.0%; P = .043) among men who received a treatment course of 1.5 g oral metronidazole daily for 14 days vs 7 days [109].

Diagnostic Methods

Highly sensitive NAATs are now available for detection of T. vaginalis. Among women, such assays may detect a prevalence 3- to 5-fold higher than wet mount [110, 111]. Clinical diagnosis may be less sensitive than molecular tests, with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 99.6% compared with molecular testing [112]. The APTIMA Trichomonas vaginalis assay (Hologic Gen-Probe, San Diego, California) was FDA-cleared in 2011 for detection of T. vaginalis from endocervical or vaginal swabs or urine from symptomatic or asymptomatic women [113]. This assay detects T. vaginalis RNA by transcription-mediated amplification with a clinical sensitivity of 95.2%–100% and specificity of 95.3%–100.0% [113115]. Among women, vaginal swabs and urine have a high degree of concordance [110]. As analyte-specific reagents, this assay can be used with urethral swabs or urine from men. Sale, distribution, and use of analyte-specific reagents are covered under the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Part 809.30 pertaining to in vitro diagnostic products for human use. In men, the sensitivity of penile-meatal swabs may be higher than that of urine (80.4% and 39.3%, respectively, in a study of 634 men) [116]. The Cobas Amplicor CT/NG PCR assay (Roche, Indianapolis, Indiana) is a commercially available, FDA-cleared assay for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea infections that can be modified for T. vaginalis detection in vaginal or endocervical swabs or urine. The assay may perform with sensitivities from 88% to 97% and specificities from 98% to 99%, depending on the specimen and reference standard [117]. The BD Probe Tec TV Qx Amplified DNA Assay (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) was FDA-cleared in late 2013 for detection of T. vaginalis from endocervical, vaginal, or urine specimens in women [118]. Self-obtained vaginal samples may be an option [119]. Although it may be feasible to perform a T. vaginalis NAAT on the same specimen used for a chlamydia/gonorrhea screening test in a young adult, the epidemiology of T. vaginalis infection is distinct and should not be overlooked in older adults.

FDA-cleared same-day rapid tests for trichomoniasis in women that may be performed at the point of care include the OSOM Trichomonas Rapid Test (Sekisui Diagnostics, Framingham, Massachusetts), an antigen-detection test using immunochromatographic capillary flow dipstick technology that is Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)–waived, and the Affirm VP III (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Maryland), a nucleic acid probe-hybridization test that evaluates for T. vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Candida albicans in vaginal secretions. The results of the OSOM Trichomonas Rapid Test are available in approximately 10 minutes, with a sensitivity of 82%–95% and specificity of 97%–100% [114, 120]. Self-testing may be an option; a study of 209 young women aged 14–22 years found that >99% could correctly perform and interpret her own self-test using the OSOM assay, with a high correlation with clinician interpretation (96% agreement, κ = 0.87) [121]. The results of the Affirm VP III are available within 45 minutes, with a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 99.9%; sensitivity may be higher among women who are symptomatic [115, 122]. Neither the OSOM nor the Affirm VP III test is approved for use with specimens from men.

Before molecular methods became available, culture was considered the gold standard method for diagnosing T. vaginalis infection. Culture has a sensitivity of 75%–96% and a specificity of up to 100% [114, 123]. In women, vaginal secretions are the preferred specimen type for culture, as urine culture is less sensitive. In men, culture requires a urethral swab, urine, and/or semen.

The most common method for diagnosing trichomoniasis may be microscopic evaluation of genital secretions (“wet mount”), due to convenience and relatively low cost. Unfortunately, the sensitivity of wet mount for T. vaginalis diagnosis is poor (51%–65%) in vaginal specimens [114, 123]. Furthermore, sensitivity declines as evaluation is delayed, decreasing by up to 20% within 1 hour after collection, although storage in saline may prolong specimen viability [124]. In male urine, wet mount is even less sensitive [125]. A molecular test–resolved algorithm, in which patients with an initial negative wet mount then receive a molecular test, had an overall sensitivity of 87.5%–96.6% and a specificity of 97.7%–100% among 296 female subjects [123].

Screening

Data presented earlier suggest that T. vaginalis infection is (1) common, (2) frequently asymptomatic, (3) easily communicable to sex partners, and (4) associated with significantly increased risks of HIV acquisition and transmission, pregnancy complications, PID among HIV-infected women, and other conditions. Particularly high prevalences have been observed among incarcerated individuals, HIV-infected individuals, and STD clinic patients. Among asymptomatic women screened for T. vaginalis infection by wet mount at STD clinics in 6 areas, the prevalence of infection was 6.5% [14]. Although treatment with nitroimidazoles has been shown to be relatively cheap, safe, simple, accessible, and effective at reducing T. vaginalis infections and symptoms of trichomoniasis, evidence is generally lacking that curing T. vaginalis infections also reduces the risk of associated conditions. No studies have adequately assessed the cost-effectiveness or the optimal frequency of screening asymptomatic persons for T. vaginalis infection. Decisions about screening may be informed by local, regional, or national epidemiology.

Screening and prompt treatment for trichomoniasis are recommended at least annually for all HIV-infected women, based on the high prevalence of T. vaginalis infection, the increased risk of PID associated with this infection, and the ability of treatment to reduce genital tract viral load and vaginal HIV shedding. This includes HIV-infected women who are pregnant, as T. vaginalis infection is a risk factor for vertical transmission of HIV [78]. For other pregnant women, screening may be considered at the discretion of the treating clinician, as the benefit of routine screening for pregnant women has not been established.

Among previously treated individuals, several studies have examined the timing of rescreening or test of cure for T. vaginalis infection. A study of 268 adolescent women in Indiana found that 85% of infections were undetectable by PCR within 2 weeks following treatment [126]. A follow-up study of 42 infected women found that the mean time to first negative PCR result was 1.4 ± 0.1 weeks [127]. A study of 1236 reproductive-age women periodically tested for T. vaginalis infection by culture and treated with standard therapy at STD clinics found that 119 (10%) were positive at baseline, 16.5% were positive at 3 months, 18.5% were positive at 6 months, 12.5% were positive at 9 months, and 6.9% were positive at 12 months. Among the women who were infected at baseline, 16.5% had another positive T. vaginalis culture during the study, indicating potential treatment failure vs reinfection from an untreated sex partner [128]. Further analysis of these data indicated that of the 21 new infections, 13 occurred in women who had been treated previously for T. vaginalis infections, and 11 of these 13 (85%) had an intervening negative test result before having another positive result when no sexual exposure was reported [129]. Probable persistent, undetected T. vaginalis infections have also been observed among HIV-infected women retested 3 and 6 months after initial evaluation [130].

Reporting and Costs

Neither trichomoniasis nor T. vaginalis infection is a nationally notifiable condition, and no US states require reporting of these conditions. Indices of public health importance warranting surveillance may include frequency, severity of illness, disparities, costs, preventability of serious adverse events, communicability, and public interest; according to a recent CDC editorial, T. vaginalis infection clearly meets only 3 of these 7 criteria (frequency, disparities, and communicability), with insufficient available data or arguable conclusions regarding other criteria [131]. Due to a paucity of public interest, trichomoniasis has been called a “neglected” STD [55, 132].

Assuming no sequelae of any T. vaginalis infection, and assuming that many asymptomatic cases are never detected, the estimated direct medical costs per year of treating incident cases of trichomoniasis in the United States total $24 million annually [133]. However, a mathematical model estimated that, annually, 746 new HIV cases occurring among US women are attributable to T. vaginalis infection; the lifetime medical costs of these 746 infections are estimated to be $167 million [134].

Prevention

Trichomoniasis is an STD that can be avoided by abstaining from sex. Among sexually active individuals, the most effective way to prevent trichomoniasis is by using condoms consistently and correctly during vaginal-penile sexual encounters [135]. Periodic presumptive treatment for high-risk individuals such as sex workers can effectively reduce trichomoniasis [136, 137]. Male circumcision might reduce the risk of infection in both circumcised men (aOR, 0.41; P = .030) [138] and their female sex partners (adjusted RR, 0.52 [95% CI, .05–.98]) [139]. It remains to be seen whether treatment and prevention of trichomoniasis and T. vaginalis infections can also prevent associated conditions such as HIV infections and complications of pregnancy. Data are lacking on effective intervention strategies to reduce associated health disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Trichomonas vaginalis infection is highly prevalent, often asymptomatic, and easily communicable between sex partners. Infection is associated with significantly increased risks of HIV acquisition and transmission, pregnancy complications including preterm delivery, PID among HIV-infected women, and other conditions. Highly sensitive NAATs and point-of-care tests can be conducted on a variety of specimens and may expand available diagnostic methods beyond traditional wet mount and culture. Usually, trichomoniasis can be cured with single-dose therapy of an appropriate nitroimidazole antibiotic (eg, metronidazole or tinidazole), but women who are also infected with HIV should receive therapy for 7 days. Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging concern. Screening should be provided at least annually to all HIV-infected women; decisions about screening others may be informed by local, regional, or national epidemiology at the discretion of the clinician. Condoms may prevent infections, but all sex partners must be treated to reduce reinfections. Further study is needed to identify effective intervention strategies to reduce associated racial/ethnic and age-related health disparities.

Notes

Acknowledgments. This article reviews evidence presented at the Sexually Transmitted Disease Treatment Guidelines meeting held in April 2013 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Disclaimer. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.

Supplement sponsorship. This article appears as part of the supplement “Evidence Papers for the CDC Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines,” sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Potential conflicts of interest. C. A. G. has been involved in clinical trials during which products from Hologic/GenProbe and BD Diagnostics were under study, and has received payment for educational lectures and webinars for Hologic/Gen-Probe, BD, and Sekisui. M. M. H. has received research support and has been involved in clinical trials for evaluation of diagnostic products from Hologic/Gen-Probe. P. K. is the principal investigator of a National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases study to examine optimal dosing of metronidazole and treatment of partners of women with T. vaginalis (R01AI097080). P. N. is a consultant for Hologic, Cepheid, Symbiomix; is an investigator in clinical trials for BD and Symbiomix; and has been a consultant and received other grants from Novadigm, Viamet, and Alfa Wasserman. J. R. S. has received grants and other financial support from Hologic, LabCorp, BD Diagnostics, Cepheid, and Elitech, and has been a consultant or received other grants from Symbiomix, Curatek, Alpha Wasserman, and Starpharma. All other authors report no potential conflicts.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

  • 1.Bachmann LH, Hobbs MM, Seña AC et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis genital infections: progress and challenges. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53(suppl 3):S160–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E et al. . Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:187–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, McQuillan G, Berman S, Markowitz L. The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001–2004. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:1319–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Miller WC, Swygard H, Hobbs MM et al. . The prevalence of trichomoniasis in young adults in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32:593–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mullins TL, Rudy BJ, Wilson CM, Sucharew H, Kahn JA. Incidence of sexually transmitted infections in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adolescents in the USA. Int J STD AIDS 2013; 24:123–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ginocchio CC, Chapin K, Smith JS et al. . Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis and coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States as determined by the Aptima Trichomonas vaginalis nucleic acid amplification assay. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50:2601–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Freeman AH, Katz KA, Pandori MW et al. . Prevalence and correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis among incarcerated persons assessed using a highly sensitive molecular assay. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:165–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Willers DM, Peipert JF, Allsworth JE, Stein MD, Rose JS, Clarke JG. Prevalence and predictors of sexually transmitted infection among newly incarcerated females. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:68–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nijhawan AE, DeLong AK, Celentano DD et al. . The association between Trichomonas infection and incarceration in HIV-seropositive and at-risk HIV-seronegative women. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:1094–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sutcliffe S, Newman SB, Hardick A, Gaydos CA. Prevalence and correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among female US federal prison inmates. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:585–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shuter J, Bell D, Graham D, Holbrook KA, Bellin EY. Rates of and risk factors for trichomoniasis among pregnant inmates in New York City. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25:303–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sosman JM, MacGowan RJ, Margolis AD et al. . Screening for sexually transmitted diseases and hepatitis in 18–29-year-old men recently released from prison: feasibility and acceptability. Int J STD AIDS 2005; 16:117–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sosman J, Macgowan R, Margolis A et al. . Sexually transmitted infections and hepatitis in men with a history of incarceration. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:634–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meites E, Llata E, Braxton J et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis in selected U.S. sexually transmitted disease clinics: testing, screening, and prevalence. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:865–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Semaan S, Neumann MS, Hutchins K, D'Anna LH, Kamb ML; Project RSG. Brief counseling for reducing sexual risk and bacterial STIs among drug users—results from project RESPECT. Drug Alcohol Depend 2010; 106:7–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller M, Liao Y, Gomez AM, Gaydos CA, D'Mellow D. Factors associated with the prevalence and incidence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among African American women in New York City who use drugs. J Infect Dis 2008; 197:503–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miller M, Liao Y, Wagner M, Korves C. HIV, the clustering of sexually transmitted infections, and sex risk among African American women who use drugs. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:696–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cosentino LA, Campbell T, Jett A et al. . Use of nucleic acid amplification testing for diagnosis of anorectal sexually transmitted infections. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50:2005–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Francis SC, Kent CK, Klausner JD et al. . Prevalence of rectal Trichomonas vaginalis and Mycoplasma genitalium in male patients at the San Francisco STD clinic, 2005–2006. Sex Transm Dis 2008; 35:797–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mayer KH, Bush T, Henry K et al. . Ongoing sexually transmitted disease acquisition and risk-taking behavior among US HIV-infected patients in primary care: implications for prevention interventions. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oud L. Trichomonal sinusitis in an adolescent patient with multiple trauma. South Med J 2009; 102:330–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kelley CF, Rosenberg ES, O'Hara BM, Sanchez T, del Rio C, Sullivan PS. Prevalence of urethral Trichomonas vaginalis in black and white men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39:739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wood BA, Monro AM. Pharmacokinetics of tinidazole and metronidazole in women after single large oral doses. Br J Vener Dis 1975; 51:51–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Viitanen J, Haataja H, Mannisto PT. Concentrations of metronidazole and tinidazole in male genital tissues. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985; 28:812–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mannisto P, Karhunen M, Mattila J et al. . Concentrations of metronidazole and tinidazole in female reproductive organs after a single intravenous infusion and after repeated oral administration. Infection 1984; 12:197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Anjaeyulu R, Gupte SA, Desai DB. Single-dose treatment of trichomonal vaginitis: a comparison of tinidazole and metronidazole. J Int Med Res 1977; 5:438–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bloch B, Smyth E. The treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis. An open controlled prospective study comparing a single dose of metronidazole tablets, benzoyl metronidazole suspension and tinidazole tablets. S Afr Med J 1985; 67:455–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gabriel G, Robertson E, Thin RN. Single dose treatment of trichomoniasis. J Int Med Res 1982; 10:129–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Manorama HT, Shenoy DR. Single-dose oral treatment of vaginal trichomoniasis with tinidazole and metronidazole. J Int Med Res 1978; 6:46–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prasertsawat PO, Jetsawangsri T. Split-dose metronidazole or single-dose tinidazole for the treatment of vaginal trichomoniasis. Sex Transm Dis 1992; 19:295–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tweats D, Bourdin Trunz B, Torreele E. Genotoxicity profile of fexinidazole—a drug candidate in clinical development for human African trypanomiasis (sleeping sickness). Mutagenesis 2012; 27:523–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tarral A, Blesson S, Mordt OV et al. . Determination of an optimal dosing regimen for fexinidazole, a novel oral drug for the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis: first-in-human studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2014; 53:565–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moraes ME, Cunha GH, Bezerra MM et al. . Efficacy of the Mentha crispa in the treatment of women with Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286:125–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bosserman EA, Helms DJ, Mosure DJ, Secor WE, Workowski KA. Utility of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Trichomonas vaginalis-infected women with clinical treatment failure. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:983–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sobel JD, Nyirjesy P, Brown W. Tinidazole therapy for metronidazole-resistant vaginal trichomoniasis. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:1341–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Subramanian C, Sobel JD. A case of high-level metronidazole-resistant trichomoniasis in pregnancy successfully treated. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2011; 15:248–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Crowell AL, Sanders-Lewis KA, Secor WE. In vitro metronidazole and tinidazole activities against metronidazole-resistant strains of Trichomonas vaginalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:1407–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Helms DJ, Mosure DJ, Secor WE, Workowski KA. Management of trichomonas vaginalis in women with suspected metronidazole hypersensitivity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:370.e1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lossick JG. Treatment of sexually transmitted vaginosis/vaginitis. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12(suppl 6):S665–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nyirjesy P, Gilbert J, Mulcahy LJ. Resistant trichomoniasis: successful treatment with combination therapy. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:962–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tayal SC, Ochogwu SA, Bunce H. Paromomycin treatment of recalcitrant Trichomonas vaginalis. Int J STD AIDS 2010; 21:217–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nyirjesy P, Sobel JD, Weitz MV, Leaman DJ, Gelone SP. Difficult-to-treat trichomoniasis: results with paromomycin cream. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:986–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Muzny C, Barnes A, Mena L. Symptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis infection in the setting of severe nitroimidazole allergy: successful treatment with boric acid. Sex Health 2012; 9:389–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aggarwal A, Shier RM. Recalcitrant Trichomonas vaginalis infections successfully treated with vaginal acidification. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30:55–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dan M, Sobel JD. Failure of nitazoxanide to cure trichomoniasis in three women. Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34:813–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schwebke JR, Lensing SY, Sobel J. Intravaginal metronidazole/miconazole for the treatment of vaginal trichomoniasis. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:710–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Obiero J, Mwethera PG, Wiysonge CS. Topical microbicides for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6:CD007961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Seña AC, Miller WC, Hobbs MM et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis infection in male sexual partners: implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:13–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kissinger P, Schmidt N, Mohammed H et al. . Patient-delivered partner treatment for Trichomonas vaginalis infection: a randomized controlled trial. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33:445–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schwebke JR, Desmond RA. A randomized controlled trial of partner notification methods for prevention of trichomoniasis in women. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:392–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mohammed H, Leichliter JS, Schmidt N, Farley TA, Kissinger P. Does patient-delivered partner treatment improve disclosure for treatable sexually transmitted diseases? AIDS Patient Care STDs 2010; 24:183–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schwebke JR, Barrientes FJ. Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis isolates with resistance to metronidazole and tinidazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50:4209–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Krashin JW, Koumans EH, Bradshaw-Sydnor AC et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis prevalence, incidence, risk factors and antibiotic-resistance in an adolescent population. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:440–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kirkcaldy RD, Augostini P, Asbel LE et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis antimicrobial drug resistance in 6 US cities, STD Surveillance Network, 2009–2010. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:939–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Secor WE, Meites E, Starr MC, Workowski KA. Neglected parasitic infections in the United States: Trichomoniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2013; 90:800–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cu-Uvin S, Ko H, Jamieson DJ et al. . Prevalence, incidence, and persistence or recurrence of trichomoniasis among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women and among HIV-negative women at high risk for HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:1406–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Moodley P, Wilkinson D, Connolly C, Moodley J, Sturm AW. Trichomonas vaginalis is associated with pelvic inflammatory disease in women infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:519–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Anderson BL, Firnhaber C, Liu T et al. . Effect of trichomoniasis therapy on genital HIV viral burden among African women. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39:638–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kissinger P, Amedee A, Clark RA et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis treatment reduces vaginal HIV-1 shedding. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36:11–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hughes JP, Baeten JM, Lingappa JR et al. . Determinants of per-coital-act HIV-1 infectivity among African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples. J Infect Dis 2012; 205:358–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mavedzenge SN, Pol BV, Cheng H et al. . Epidemiological synergy of Trichomonas vaginalis and HIV in Zimbabwean and South African women. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:460–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Van Der Pol B, Kwok C, Pierre-Louis B et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis infection and human immunodeficiency virus acquisition in African women. J Infect Dis 2008; 197:548–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.McClelland RS, Sangare L, Hassan WM et al. . Infection with Trichomonas vaginalis increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition. J Infect Dis 2007; 195:698–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Quinlivan EB, Patel SN, Grodensky CA, Golin CE, Tien HC, Hobbs MM. Modeling the impact of Trichomonas vaginalis infection on HIV transmission in HIV-infected individuals in medical care. Sex Transm Dis 2012; 39:671–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Price MA, Miller WC, Kaydos-Daniels SC et al. . Trichomoniasis in men and HIV infection: data from 2 outpatient clinics at Lilongwe Central Hospital, Malawi. J Infect Dis 2004; 190:1448–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Paz-Bailey G, Sternberg M, Puren AJ, Steele L, Lewis DA. Determinants of HIV type 1 shedding from genital ulcers among men in South Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:1060–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kissinger P, Adamski A. Trichomoniasis and HIV interactions: a review. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89:426–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Balkus JE, Richardson BA, Mochache V et al. . A prospective cohort study comparing the effect of single-dose 2 g metronidazole on Trichomonas vaginalis infection in HIV-seropositive versus HIV-seronegative women. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:499–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Moodley P, Wilkinson D, Connolly C, Sturm AW. Influence of HIV-1 coinfection on effective management of abnormal vaginal discharge. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kissinger P, Mena L, Levison J et al. . A randomized treatment trial: single versus 7-day dose of metronidazole for the treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis among HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010; 55:565–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gatski M, Mena L, Levison J et al. . Patient-delivered partner treatment and Trichomonas vaginalis repeat infection among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:502–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cotch MF, Pastorek JG II, Nugent RP et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis associated with low birth weight and preterm delivery. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24:353–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mann JR, McDermott S, Gill T. Sexually transmitted infection is associated with increased risk of preterm birth in South Carolina women insured by Medicaid. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23:563–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mann JR, McDermott S, Barnes TL, Hardin J, Bao H, Zhou L. Trichomoniasis in pregnancy and mental retardation in children. Ann Epidemiol 2009; 19:891–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mann JR, McDermott S. Are maternal genitourinary infection and pre-eclampsia associated with ADHD in school-aged children? J Atten Disord 2011; 15:667–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Trintis J, Epie N, Boss R, Riedel S. Neonatal Trichomonas vaginalis infection: a case report and review of literature. Int J STD AIDS 2010; 21:606–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Carter JE, Whithaus KC. Neonatal respiratory tract involvement by Trichomonas vaginalis: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008; 78:17–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gumbo FZ, Duri K, Kandawasvika GQ et al. . Risk factors of HIV vertical transmission in a cohort of women under a PMTCT program at three peri-urban clinics in a resource-poor setting. J Perinatol 2010; 30:717–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.US Food and Drug Administration. Package insert: Flagyl® metronidazole tablets, 2010. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/012623s061lbl.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  • 80.Czeizel AE, Rockenbauer M. A population based case-control teratologic study of oral metronidazole treatment during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:322–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Koss CA, Baras DC, Lane SD et al. . Investigation of metronidazole use during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012; 56:4800–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mann JR, McDermott S, Zhou L, Barnes TL, Hardin J. Treatment of trichomoniasis in pregnancy and preterm birth: an observational study. J Womens Health 2009; 18:493–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gulmezoglu AM, Azhar M. Interventions for trichomoniasis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 5:CD000220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Stringer E, Read JS, Hoffman I, Valentine M, Aboud S, Goldenberg RL. Treatment of trichomoniasis in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa does not appear to be associated with low birth weight or preterm birth. S Afr Med J 2010; 100:58–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Goldenberg RL, Mwatha A, Read JS et al. . The HPTN 024 Study: the efficacy of antibiotics to prevent chorioamnionitis and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:650–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Erickson SH, Oppenheim GL, Smith GH. Metronidazole in breast-milk. Obstet Gynecol 1981; 57:48–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Passmore CM, Mcelnay JC, Rainey EA, Darcy PF. Metronidazole excretion in human-milk and its effect on the suckling neonate. Br J Cli Pharmacol 1988; 26:45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Golightly P, Kearney L. Metronidazole—is it safe to use with breastfeeding? 2012. Available at: http://www.medicinesresources.nhs.uk/GetDocument.aspx?pageId=748632. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  • 89.Czeizel AE, Kazy Z, Vargha P. Oral tinidazole treatment during pregnancy and teratogenesis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 83:305–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Nugent RP, Gibbs RS. Characteristics of three vaginal flora patterns assessed by Gram stain among pregnant women. Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group . Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:938–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Martin DH, Zozaya M, Lillis RA, Myers L, Nsuami MJ, Ferris MJ. Unique vaginal microbiota that includes an unknown Mycoplasma-like organism is associated with Trichomonas vaginalis infection. J Infect Dis 2013; 207:1922–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Schwebke JR, Desmond R. A randomized trial of metronidazole in asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis to prevent the acquisition of sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:517. e1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gatski M, Martin DH, Levison J et al. . The influence of bacterial vaginosis on the response to Trichomonas vaginalis treatment among HIV-infected women. Sex Transm Infect 2011; 87:205–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wendel KA, Erbelding EJ, Gaydos CA, Rompalo AM. Use of urine polymerase chain reaction to define the prevalence and clinical presentation of Trichomonas vaginalis in men attending an STD clinic. Sex Transm Infect 2003; 79:151–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wetmore CM, Manhart LE, Lowens MS et al. . Demographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of men with nongonococcal urethritis differ by etiology: a case-comparison study. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:180–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schwebke JR, Rompalo A, Taylor S et al. . Re-evaluating the treatment of nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens—a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:163–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Seña AC, Lensing S, Rompalo A et al. . Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis infections in men with nongonococcal urethritis: predictors and persistence after therapy. J Infect Dis 2012; 206:357–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Schwebke JR, Hook EW III. High rates of Trichomonas vaginalis among men attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic: implications for screening and urethritis management. J Infect Dis 2003; 188:465–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Morency P, Dubois MJ, Gresenguet G et al. . Aetiology of urethral discharge in Bangui, Central African Republic. Sex Transm Infect 2001; 77:125–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Price MA, Zimba D, Hoffman IF et al. . Addition of treatment for trichomoniasis to syndromic management of urethritis in Malawi: a randomized clinical trial. Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:516–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Allsworth JE, Ratner JA, Peipert JF. Trichomoniasis and other sexually transmitted infections: results from the 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36:738–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Cherpes TL, Wiesenfeld HC, Melan MA et al. . The associations between pelvic inflammatory disease, Trichomonas vaginalis infection, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm Dis 2006; 33:747–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Benchimol M, de Andrade Rosa I, da Silva Fontes R, Burla Dias AJ. Trichomonas adhere and phagocytose sperm cells: adhesion seems to be a prominent stage during interaction. Parasitol Res 2008; 102:597–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ozdemir E, Kelestemur N, Kaplan M. Trichomonas vaginalis as a rare cause of male factor infertility at a hospital in East Anatolia. Andrologia 2011; 43:283–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sherman KJ, Daling JR, Weiss NS. Sexually transmitted diseases and tubal infertility. Sex Transm Dis 1987; 14:12–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sutcliffe S, Giovannucci E, Alderete JF et al. . Plasma antibodies against Trichomonas vaginalis and subsequent risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15:939–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Stark JR, Judson G, Alderete JF et al. . Prospective study of Trichomonas vaginalis infection and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: Physicians' Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101:1406–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sutcliffe S, Alderete JF, Till C et al. . Trichomonosis and subsequent risk of prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. Int J Cancer 2009; 124:2082–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Vickovic N, Skerk V, Granic J et al. . Metronidazole 1.5 gram dose for 7 or 14 days in the treatment of patients with chronic prostatitis caused by Trichomonas vaginalis: a randomized study. J Chemother 2010; 22:364–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hollman D, Coupey SM, Fox AS, Herold BC. Screening for Trichomonas vaginalis in high-risk adolescent females with a new transcription-mediated nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT): associations with ethnicity, symptoms, and prior and current STIs. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010; 23:312–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Roth AM, Williams JA, Ly R et al. . Changing sexually transmitted infection screening protocol will result in improved case finding for Trichomonas vaginalis among high-risk female populations. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:398–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lowe NK, Neal JL, Ryan-Wenger NA. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of vaginitis compared with a DNA probe laboratory standard. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113:89–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Schwebke JR, Hobbs MM, Taylor SN et al. . Molecular testing for Trichomonas vaginalis in women: results from a prospective U.S. clinical trial. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:4106–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Huppert JS, Mortensen JE, Reed JL et al. . Rapid antigen testing compares favorably with transcription-mediated amplification assay for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in young women. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:194–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Andrea SB, Chapin KC. Comparison of Aptima Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification assay and BD affirm VPIII for detection of T. vaginalis in symptomatic women: performance parameters and epidemiological implications. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:866–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Dize L, Agreda P, Quinn N, Barnes MR, Hsieh YH, Gaydos CA. Comparison of self-obtained penile-meatal swabs to urine for the detection of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89:305–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Van Der Pol B, Kraft CS, Williams JA. Use of an adaptation of a commercially available PCR assay aimed at diagnosis of chlamydia and gonorrhea to detect Trichomonas vaginalis in urogenital specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:366–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Van Der Pol B, Williams JA, Taylor SN et al. . Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis DNA by use of self-obtained vaginal swabs with the BD ProbeTec Qx assay on the BD Viper system. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:885–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Gaydos CA, Hsieh YH, Barnes M et al. . Trichomonas vaginalis infection in women who submit self-obtained vaginal samples after internet recruitment. Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:828–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Campbell L, Woods V, Lloyd T, Elsayed S, Church DL. Evaluation of the OSOM Trichomonas rapid test versus wet preparation examination for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis in specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46:3467–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Huppert JS, Hesse E, Kim G et al. . Adolescent women can perform a point-of-care test for trichomoniasis as accurately as clinicians. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86:514–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Brown HL, Fuller DD, Jasper LT, Davis TE, Wright JD. Clinical evaluation of affirm VPIII in the detection and identification of Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Candida species in vaginitis/vaginosis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2004; 12:17–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Nye MB, Schwebke JR, Body BA. Comparison of APTIMA Trichomonas vaginalis transcription-mediated amplification to wet mount microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of trichomoniasis in men and women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:188.e181–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Stoner KA, Rabe LK, Meyn LA, Hillier SL. Survival of Trichomonas vaginalis in wet preparation and on wet mount. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89:485–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Kingston MA, Bansal D, Carlin EM. ‘Shelf life’ of Trichomonas vaginalis. Int J STD AIDS 2003; 14:28–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Van Der Pol B, Williams JA, Orr DP, Batteiger BE, Fortenberry JD. Prevalence, incidence, natural history, and response to treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among adolescent women. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:2039–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Williams J, Van Der Pol B, Ofner S, Batteiger B, Orr DP, Fortenberry JD. Time from treatment to negative PCR results for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae and T. vaginalis (P-70). In: 2008 National STD Prevention Conference, Chicago, IL, 10–13 March 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Peterman TA, Tian LH, Metcalf CA et al. . High incidence of new sexually transmitted infections in the year following a sexually transmitted infection: a case for rescreening. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145:564–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Peterman TA, Tian LH, Metcalf CA et al. . Persistent, undetected Trichomonas vaginalis infections? Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:259–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gatski M, Kissinger P. Observation of probable persistent, undetected Trichomonas vaginalis infection among HIV-positive women. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:114–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hoots BE, Peterman TA, Torrone EA, Weinstock H, Meites E, Bolan GA. A Trich-y question: should Trichomonas vaginalis infection be reportable? Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:113–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Meites E. Trichomoniasis: the “neglected” sexually transmitted disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2013; 27:755–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Owusu-Edusei K Jr, Chesson HW, Gift TL et al. . The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Chesson HW, Blandford JM, Pinkerton SD. Estimates of the annual number and cost of new HIV infections among women attributable to trichomoniasis in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2004; 31:547–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Crosby RA, Charnigo RA, Weathers C, Caliendo AM, Shrier LA. Condom effectiveness against non-viral sexually transmitted infections: a prospective study using electronic daily diaries. Sex Transm Infect 2012; 88:484–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Garcia PJ, Holmes KK, Carcamo CP et al. . Prevention of sexually transmitted infections in urban communities (Peru PREVEN): a multicomponent community-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379:1120–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Balkus JE, Richardson BA, Mandaliya K et al. . Establishing and sustaining a healthy vaginal environment: analysis of data from a randomized trial of periodic presumptive treatment for vaginal infections. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:323–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Taljaard D, Nieuwoudt M, Lissouba P, Puren A, Auvert B. Male circumcision and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Trichomonas vaginalis: observations after a randomised controlled trial for HIV prevention. Sex Transm Infect 2009; 85:116–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D et al. . The effects of male circumcision on female partners' genital tract symptoms and vaginal infections in a randomized trial in Rakai, Uganda. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:42. e1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES