Abstract
Radiotherapy of individuals suffering with head & neck or brain tumors subserve the risk of sensorineural hearing loss. Here, we evaluated the protective effect of Aminothiol PrC-210 (3-(methyl-amino)-2-((methylamino)methyl)propane-1-thiol) on the irradiated inner ear of guinea pigs. An intra-peritoneal or intra-tympanic dose of PrC-210 was administered prior to receiving a dose of gamma radiation (3000 cGy) to each ear. Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs) were recorded one week and two weeks after the radiation and compared with the sham animal group. ABR thresholds of guinea pigs that received an intra-peritoneal dose of PrC-210 were significantly better compared to the non-treated, control animals at one week post-radiation. Morphologic analysis of the inner ear revealed significant inflammation and degeneration of the spiral ganglion in the irradiated animals not treated with PrC-210. In contrast, when treated with PrC-210 the radiation effect and injury to the spiral ganglion was significantly alleviated. PrC-210 had no apparent cytotoxic effect in vivo and did not affect the morphology or count of cochlear hair cells. These findings suggest that aminothiol PrC-210 attenuated radiation-induced cochlea damage for at least one week and protected hearing.
Introduction
Radiation is a treatment modality used for tumors of the head, neck and central nervous system. One of the clinical challenges of radiation to these sites is that the inner ear (cochlea and vestibular organs), temporal bone, and brain are within the radiation field, which may result in sensorineural hearing loss and balance disorders [1, 2]. Generally, radiation induced sensorineural hearing loss is a result of degeneration of the outer and inner hair cells within the organ of Corti and spiral ganglion neurons [3]. Many attempts have been made to prevent, minimize, or reverse the effects of radiation on the inner ear. The greatest advances have been achieved by improved radiation techniques that have reduced radiation dose to the inner ear [4].
Patients treated with therapeutic radiation for brain tumors, acoustic neuromas, or nasopharyngeal carcinomas may develop radiation-induced hearing loss due to damage of the inner ear [5, 6]. In vitro studies have revealed that radiation induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These ROS create an oxidative stress that activates the apoptotic pathway, which ultimately leads to the degeneration of sensory hair cells, cells in the stria vascularis, and the spiral ganglion neurons [7]. For decades, efforts have been made to determine effective radioprotective agents that may protect the inner ear in animal models or in vitro hair cell lines [7]. These radioprotective agents include Epicatechin [8], Amifostine [9], L-N-acetylcysteine [10], L-carnitine [11] and piracetam [12]. Some of these compounds may interfere with cancer treatment, as they were not tested on animal tumor models. Amifostine and palifermin are radioprotective compounds that scavenge free radicals and inhibit apoptosis and are the only two compounds approved by the US FDA in radiation therapy in human [13]. The commonly cited radio-protective drug amifostine has multiple side effects including the hearing impairment [9, 14–16]. In this study, we investigated a new aminothiol radioprotector (PrC-210), which belongs to the family of aminothiol radioprotectors and is highly efficient and has fewer side effects, such as nausea and hypotension when administered orally or systemically [17, 18]. PrC-210 conferred 100% survival in rat and mouse models against a 100% lethal whole-body radiation dose (9.0 Gy) when administered 30–90 min before irradiation [17]. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PrC-210, administered prior to radiation, via intra-tympanic (IT) or intra-peritoneal (IP) routes, protects against radiation induced inner ear damage and hearing loss.
Materials and Methods
All the experiments were conducted and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol number 2D12106).
Animals and Study Groups
Guinea pigs weighing 250–300 grams were obtained from Charles River (Wilmington, MA). All animals had ABRs performed at the beginning of the study. Animals with abnormal baseline ABR were excluded. Guinea pigs with normal hearing were divided into three groups (Table 1). Radiation doses were confirmed by InLight® nanoDot™dosimeters, designed for use in single point radiation with a dose operating range of 10 μGy to >100 Gy. Animals from each group had ABRs performed on day 6 and day 12. All animals were monitored daily for weight loss, signs of dehydration, abnormal behavior, aspect of the fur and routine health maintenance. Animals that were exhibiting signs of anorexia and dehydration before the end of the study were euthanized utilizing Fatal Plus (Vortech Pharmaceuticals, Dearborn, MI USA) via intracardiac injection, then decapitated.
Table 1. Distribution of Guinea pigs into various study groups.
Radiation (cGy) | PrC-210 | Number of animals | Death of animals | Number of Cochleae | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left | Right | Cumulated | IT (185mg/kg) | IP (93.6mg/kg) | Week 1 | Week 2 | |||
Group 1 | 2000 | 2000 | 3000 | No | No | 8 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
Group 2 | 2000 | 2000 | 3000 | Yes | No | 5 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
Group 3 | 2000 | 2000 | 3000 | No | Yes | 6 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Total | 19 | 0 | 4 | 30 |
Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR)
ABR testing was performed under general anesthesia. Animals were positioned in a faraday cage and needle electrodes were placed on the vertex and behind each pinna. Frequency specific tone pips at 8, 16 and 32 kHz were delivered to the ear in 10 dB increments using high frequency transducers (MO14600) inserted into the ear canals [19]. Waveforms were recorded using an Intelligent Hearing Systems Smart-EP (Miami FL, USA). Thresholds were defined as the lowest level at which a reproducible response could be obtained. ABRs were performed prior to intra-tympanic (IT) injection or intra-peritoneal (IP) injections (day 0). Then, ABR evaluations were performed on day 6 and 12.
Drug Administration
Animals were initially anesthetized using inhalational of 2–3% Isoflurane /oxygen, then kept asleep through nose mask using 1–2% isoflurane/oxygen during the hearing test and for drug injection. A surgical otomicroscope and speculum were utilized to identify the tympanic membrane. For Group 2: using a 1ml syringe and a 27G 1.5inch sterile needle, 100 μl of the PrC-210 solution at 185mg/kg, was injected IT. For Group 3: PrC-210 was given IP (93.6 mg/kg). The total amount of Prc-210 injected through IT was more important the IP injection as we are we are usually loosing some solution when we are injecting it through the intra-tympanic membrane. Less than one hour after drug administration, the animals were taken to the cesium irradiator equipment [17].
Radiation protocol
Prior to partial cranial irradiation, Ketamine (50mg/kg) and xylazine (6mg/kg) were administered subcutaneous to keep the animals immobilized in the prone position while in the cesium irradiator. A lead shield was constructed, 12” x 12” and 1.5 cm thick (Fig 1) to provide ~2 half value layers (HVL) of radiation shielding to the guinea pigs. A 4x¾ inch opening was drilled and tested by the physics team to confirm the output factor. Guinea pigs were irradiated with a Cs-137 irradiator (Mark I-68 A, J.L. Shepherd and Associated, San Fernando, CA). Sedated guinea pigs were placed on an elevated stage of the irradiator, behind the lead shield, exposing only the ear/auricle region (Fig 1). Each ear received 2000 cGy at a dose rate of 1.6 Gy/minute (total 12.5 minutes exposure, each side). The guinea pigs were turned to expose each side. During the radiation-planning phase of this trial, InLight® nanoDot™dosimeters were placed on the guinea pigs to confirm dosing. The results were consistent with measurements performed during planning. When measured with InLight® nanoDot™dosimeters, the intended planning dose was 1000 cGy for each cochlea: the left side entrance dose was 665 cGy and the exit dose was 424 cGy. The second trial yielded nanodotTM results of 1111 cGy for a combined entrance and exit dose. The third trial yielded a combined entrance and exit dose of 1062 cGy.
A dose escalation trial was performed to assess the radiation dose needed for cochlear hair cell death at day 7. According to radiobiology literature, higher radiation doses achieve more significant radiation induced cochlear hair cell loss [9]. In guinea pigs, a single dose of 350 cGy is enough to promote hair cell death 30 days after irradiation [9]. A fractionated dose of 3300 cGy induces apoptosis of hair cells 72 hours after guinea pigs were irradiated but the percentage of hair cell death was not quantified [11]. In this dose escalation trial, we observed hair cell death 72 hours after guinea pigs received a cumulative dose of 1000 cGy (0.85% of dead hair cells) (S1 Fig). The hair cell death was increased when guinea pigs received a dose of 1000 cGy every 24h for 3 days but the number of dead hair cell was very low and cannot explain by itself the hearing loss induced by the radiation (2.5% of dead hair cells). In this study, due to animal irradiation schedule and logistics, we chose to give a single dose of 2000 cGy bilateraly resulting in a cumulative 3000 cGY dose for each temporal bone and evaluate hearing loss 6 and 12 days after irradiation.
Postmortem analysis
In all groups, the surviving guinea pigs were euthanized utilizing Fatal Plus (Vortech Pharmaceuticals, Dearborn, MI USA) via intracardiac injection. Following euthanasia, temporal bones were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 24 hours at 4°C. Excess bone was removed from around the cochlea. The cochlea was then decalcified using 0.25M EDTA (Promega, Madison, WI) at 4°C. After 48 hours, the cochlea was washed with 1X PBS and processed for paraffin embedding. The specimens were then embedded and sectioned at 6μm thickness, mounted and H&E stained.
Antibodies
The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Myosin VII polyclonal antibody (1:200, Proteus Biosciences), Alexa Fluor-488 goat anti-rabbit (1:1000 dilution, Invitrogen).
Immunostaining
The guinea pigs temporal bones were harvested and fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. After 3 washes with PBS, the temporal bones were incubated for 3 days in a PBS solution containing 0.25M EDTA. Cochleae were isolated and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 for 1 hour. Cochleae were then blocked with 10% normal goat serum (NGS; Vector Labs) diluted in PBS for 1 hour. Cochleae were incubated overnight at 4°C with a primary antibody diluted in PBS containing 3% NGS. After washing cochleae were incubated with a secondary antibody for 1 hour in PBS solution containing 3% NGS. Rhodamine phalloidin was used at a 1:300 dilution for F-actin staining (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Molecular Probes). Cochleae were mounted using Prolong Gold antifade mounting medium (Molecular Probes). Organs of Corti were imaged using a confocal microscope (LSM 700, Carl Zeiss).
Statistical analysis
Auditory Brainstem Response thresholds were analyzed using Prism 4 software (GraphPad software). Total average thresholds were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Average pure tone thresholds were compared using Student’s t-test. Hair cell loss data was analyzed using Student’s t-test. *, p< = 0.05; **, p< = 0.01; ***, p< = 0.001; n.s., non significant.
Results
This study involved 19 total animals/ 38 total ears that were exposed to radiation. Four guinea pigs were euthanized as they showed signs of anorexia and dehydration, oral mucositis, stomatitis and moist confluent desquamation before the second week analyses. In the remaining 15 animals, there were 30 cochleae that were histologically examined.
The aminothiol radioprotector PrC-210 did not cause inner ear cytotoxicity
To study the cytotoxicity of the aminothiol radioprotector PrC-210 on the inner ear, two guinea pigs received one intra-peritoneal (IP) or intra-tympanic (IT) injection of PrC-210. Guinea pigs were monitored daily for one week. The animals did not demonstrate vestibular dysfunction (head bobbing or head jerking movements). The guinea pig locomotion or coordination was not changed or altered. Seven days after injection of PrC-210, the animals were euthanized. Cochleae were dissected and immunostained with myosin VIIa, a sensory hair cell marker and phalloidin for the organ of Corti morphologic analysis. Guinea pigs treated with an IP or IT injections were noted to have normal cochleae and did not demonstrate quantitative hair cell loss in any of the cochlear turns (S2 Fig).
Auditory radioprotective effects were demonstrated in guinea pigs that received pre-radiation Aminothiol PrC-210
The guinea pigs in this study were tested for hearing thresholds prior to PrC-210 and radiation exposure. To determine if PrC-210 has an auditory radioprotective effect, guinea pigs were divided into three groups. Group 2 received an intra-peritoneal (IP) dose. Group 3 received an intra-tympanic (IT) dose of PrC-210. Within one hour, the animals from all three groups were irradiated with a cumulative dose of 3000 cGy to each side. Every week for 2 weeks, ABRs click responses were recorded and average thresholds were compared to the non-treated arm (Group 1). Radiation induces an average of 20 dB hearing loss after 1 week in guinea pigs (Fig 2). This hearing loss was variable for the radiation treated arm but all the animals had a minimum of 5–10dB hearing threshold shift at week one. When animals received an intra-tympanic dose of PrC-210 just before irradiation (Fig 2; Rad+PrC-210 IT), they had a hearing loss statistically not different from the non-treated arm (Fig 2). Interestingly, the animals that received one injection of intra-peritoneal PrC-210 had significantly improved hearing thresholds, showing that the PrC-210 had protective effects on the radiation-induced hearing loss when injected in the systemic circulation (Fig 2; Rad+PrC-210 IP). However, after 2 weeks the hearing thresholds of PrC-210 treated animals were not significantly different from the non- PrC-210 treated arm, showing that the protective effect of PrC-210 is limited, not sustained. Although, the significance is lost at two weeks, there was still a trend toward improved thresholds with the radiation + intra-peritoneal PrC-210 arm (Fig 2). The hearing thresholds shift of both ears was comparable within each arm, showing the reproducibility of the data (Fig 2).
The aminothiol PrC-210 has a better radioprotector effects on the apical coil of the cochlea
Next, average pure tone thresholds were measured at 8 kHz, 16 kHz and 32 kHz for each group of guinea pigs. After 1 week, 8 kHz, 16 kHz and 32 kHz tone thresholds of the Rad+PrC-210 IP arm were significantly lower than the thresholds of the non-treated and Rad+PrC-210 IT arms (S2 and S3 Figs). After 2 weeks, the 8 kHz tone threshold of the Rad+PrC-210 IP arm was significantly lower than the thresholds of the non-treated and Rad+PrC-210 IT arms, whereas the 16 kHz and 32 kHz tone thresholds were not significantly different (S2 and S3 Figs). These results suggest that the aminothiol PrC-210 had a better radioprotector effect on the apical coil than on the medial and basal coils of the cochlea.
The aminothiol PrC-210 prevents the inflammation and the degeneration of the spiral ganglion induced by the radiation
To identify the cause of the radiation-induced hearing loss, we analyzed the morphology of the organ of Corti and the spiral ganglion at 1 week and 2 weeks after the 3000 cGy dose of radiation. We did not observe any obvious deficit in the morphology of the organ of Corti after radiation exposure (Fig 3). No significant hair cell loss in any region of the cochlea coil was observed in any group (Figs 3 and 4). High magnification images are showing that the structure of the stereociliary bundle is not affected by the radiation (Figs 3 and 4). We also analyzed the morphology of cochlea, and the spiral ganglion of irradiated animals on hematoxylin/eosin stained paraffin sections as compared to non-irradiated animals (Fig 4). The spiral ganglion of irradiated/non-PRC-210 treated animals show signs of hydropic and vacuolar degeneration as compared to control group, which did not receive any radiation (Fig 4, arrows). When, animals were treated with intra-peritoneal injection of PrC-210, the spiral ganglion was preserved up to 1 week after the radiation. However, the spiral ganglion morphology revealed early signs of degeneration, including vacuoles in the cell body (Fig 4). Two weeks after the radiation, the spiral ganglion of PrC-210 treated animals presented a gradient of degeneration of the spiral ganglion along the apico-basal axis of the cochlea (Fig 4 and Fig 5).
Discussion
In this pilot study, we demonstrate that intra-peritoneal and intra-tympanic injections of Prc-210 have no apparent cytotoxic effects on the inner ear. A single systemic injection of PrC-210 preserved hearing function of irradiated guinea pigs for one week. When injected into the systemic circulation, the aminothiol PrC-210 efficiently reduced the inflammation of the spiral ganglion and preserved the inner ear morphology. We hypothesize that the accessibility to the spiral ganglion by PrC-210 is better when injected into the systemic circulation, as the intra-tympanic injections of PrC-210 were not efficient. The investigators of this study presume that PrC-210 reaches the inner ear through the cochlear artery, reduces the oxidative stress in the spiral ganglion and or/ hair cells, and increases the survival of cells. The hearing preservation by PrC-210 was better in the low frequency than in the high frequencies. Basal hair cells, which are activated at high frequencies, are also more sensitive to chemicals and aging and potentially to the oxidative stress. The dose of PrC-210 might not be sufficient to prevent the death or the functionality of those cells. The radioprotector effect of PrC-210 was not sustained at 15 days after radiation, indicating that multiple injections of the drug might be suitable and might improve the radioprotection in the time.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. F. Smith, J. Breneman, W. Barrett, M. Lamba, and W. Kassing for their support and helpful discussion. We also thank M. Davis and J. Bailey for their technical assistance. Supported by the funds from Department of Radiation, University of Cincinnati.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Supported by funds from Department of Radiation, University of Cincinnati. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Young YH, Lou PJ. Post-irradiation sudden deafness. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 1999;113(9):815–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gamble JE, Peterson EA, Chandler JR. Radiation effects on the inner ear. Archives of otolaryngology. 1968;88(2):156–61. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Winther FO. X-ray irradiation of the inner ear of the guinea pig. Early degenerative changes in the cochlea. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1969;68(1):98–117. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huang E, Teh BS, Strother DR, Davis QG, Chiu JK, Lu HH, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: early report on the reduction of ototoxicity. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2002;52(3):599–605. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fleury B, Lapeyre M. Tolerance of normal tissues to radiation therapy: ear]. Cancer radiotherapie: journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique. 2010;14(4–5):284–9. 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.02.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Stieber VW, Mehta MP. Advances in radiation therapy for brain tumors. Neurologic clinics. 2007;25(4):1005–33, ix. 10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mujica-Mota MA, Lehnert S, Devic S, Gasbarrino K, Daniel SJ. Mechanisms of radiation-induced sensorineural hearing loss and radioprotection. Hearing research. 2014;312:60–8. 10.1016/j.heares.2014.03.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pyun JH, Kang SU, Hwang HS, Oh YT, Kang SH, Lim YA, et al. Epicatechin inhibits radiation-induced auditory cell death by suppression of reactive oxygen species generation. Neuroscience. 2011;199:410–20. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.012 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lessa RM, Oliveira JA, Rossato M, Ghilardi Netto T. Analysis of the cytoprotective effect of amifostine on the irradiated inner ear of guinea pigs: an experimental study. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2009;75(5):694–700. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Low WK, Sun L, Tan MG, Chua AW, Wang DY. L-N-Acetylcysteine protects against radiation-induced apoptosis in a cochlear cell line. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2008;128(4):440–5. 10.1080/00016480701762490 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Altas E, Ertekin MV, Gundogdu C, Demirci E. L-carnitine reduces cochlear damage induced by gamma irradiation in Guinea pigs. Annals of clinical and laboratory science. 2006;36(3):312–8. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Altas E, Ertekin MV, Kuduban O, Gundogdu C, Demirci E, Sutbeyaz Y. Effects of piracetam supplementation on cochlear damage occurring in guinea pigs exposed to irradiation. Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin. 2006;29(7):1460–5. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Johnke RM, Sattler JA, Allison RR. Radioprotective agents for radiation therapy: future trends. Future oncology. 2014;10(15):2345–57. 10.2217/fon.14.175 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Page EE, Deshpande SS, Nelson NS, Felice PA, Donneys A, Rodriguez JJ, et al. Prophylactic administration of Amifostine protects vessel thickness in the setting of irradiated bone. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS. 2015;68(1):98–103. 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Oshima CT, Ribeiro DA, Gomes TS, Adios PC, Egami MI, Segreto HR. Amifostine Increases FAS and Caspase-3 Expression in Colonic Tissue of Irradiated Mice. Anticancer research. 2015;35(5):2817–22. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Akkus Yildirim B, Cetin E, Topkan E, Ozyigit G, Cengiz M, Surucu S, et al. Prevention of Radiation-Induced Retinopathy with Amifostine in Wistar Albino Rats. Retina. 2015;35(7):1458–64. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000493 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Soref CM, Hacker TA, Fahl WE. A new orally active, aminothiol radioprotector-free of nausea and hypotension side effects at its highest radioprotective doses. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2012;82(5):e701–7. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.038 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Peebles DD, Soref CM, Copp RR, Thunberg AL, Fahl WE. ROS-scavenger and radioprotective efficacy of the new PrC-210 aminothiol. Radiation research. 2012;178(1):57–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ingham NJ, Thornton SK, Comis SD, Withington DJ. The auditory brainstem response of aged guinea pigs. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1998;118(5):673–80. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.