Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):16528–16535.

Identification of an SCLC susceptibility rs7963551 genetic polymorphism in a previously GWAS-identified 12p13.33 RAD52 lung cancer risk locus in the Chinese population

Sichong Han 1,*, Feng Gao 2,*, Wenjun Yang 3, Yanli Ren 1, Xue Liang 1, Xiangyu Xiong 1, Wenting Pan 1, Liqing Zhou 4, Changchun Zhou 5, Fei Ma 6, Ming Yang 1
PMCID: PMC4659068  PMID: 26629180

Abstract

As a well-known DNA repair gene, RAD52 plays an essential role in homologous recombination repair of double strand break, maintenance of genomic stability and prevention of cell malignant transformation. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified common genetic variants at 12p13.33 RAD52 locus associated with lung cancer risk in Caucasians. However, little or nothing has been known about the RAD52 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the Chinese population. As a result, we examined the association between six RAD52 SNPs (rs10849605, rs1051669, rs10774474, rs11571378, rs7963551 and rs6489769) and SCLC susceptibility in Chinese. After 520 SCLC cases and 1040 controls in two independent case-control sets were genotyped, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by logistic regression. We found that only the RAD52 rs7963551 SNP was significantly associated with SCLC risk among six RAD52 SNPs genotyped. The odds of having the rs7963551 CA genotype in SCLC patients was 0.38 (95% CI = 0.24-0.62, P = 1.1×10-4) compared with the CC genotype. Stratified analyses of association between rs7963551 SNP and SCLC risk indicated that the functional polymorphism was only significantly associated with decreased risk among smokers but not nonsmokers. Our results demonstrated that the functional RAD52 rs7963551 SNP contributes to susceptibility to developing SCLC in the Chinese population.

Keywords: GWAS, RAD52, single nucleotide polymorphism, small cell lung cancer, susceptibility

Introduction

Lung cancer currently ranks as the foremost cause of cancer deaths among men and women in the world. Lung cancer includes two common histological subtypes: non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although only about 20% lung cancer patients suffered from SCLC, the disease shows much more aggressive phenotype compared to NSCLC [1-3]. SCLC shows rapid doubling time, high growth fraction and early development of widespread metastases, which might be major causes of its poor prognosis [2,3]. Although the etiology of SCLC is not completely clear, tobacco smoking has been found as one of major risk factors [2,3]. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple novel genetic polymorphisms associated with risk of lung cancer among different ethnic populations [4-12], which indicate that susceptibility may play a part in the pathogenesis of SCLC. However, most identified risk loci do not impact lung cancer susceptibly differentially by histology, suggesting that different genetic components may contribute to SCLC risk [4-12].

Previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified common genetic variants at the 12p13.33 RAD52 locus associated with lung cancer risk in Caucasians. Shi et al. reported that the 12p13.33 locus (RAD52, rs6489769) is a susceptibility locus for squamous cell lung carcinoma in a GWAS of 5,355 European smoking lung cancer cases and 4,344 smoking controls [13]. The association was successfully replicated in three independent European samples totaling 3,359 cases and 9,100 controls (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.20, P combined = 2.3×10-8) [13]. In a meta-analysis of 16 GWASs (14,900 cases and 29,485 controls of European descent), Timofeeva et al found histology-specific effects for the 12p13.33 locus (RAD52, rs10849605) on squamous cell lung carcinoma (OR = 0.87, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 0.83-0.92, P = 5.69×10-8) as well as SCLC (OR = 0.85, 95% CIs = 0.79-0.91, P = 2.00×10-6) in Caucasians [14]. To explore how these genetic findings translate into non-European populations, they repeated the study in a Han Chinese study of 2,338 lung cancer cases and 3,077 controls, but found no associations in either squamous cell lung carcinoma (OR = 0.67, 95% CIs = 0.84-1.08, P = 0.45) or SCLC (OR = 0.97, 95% CIs = 0.77-1.23, P = 0.81) [14]. However, little or nothing has been reported the involvement of other RAD52 locus single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in SCLC in the Chinese population, especially the regulatory rs7963551 A > C polymorphism in 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR). Accumulated evidences demonstrated that the rs7963551 A-to-C change decreases the binding affinity of miRNA let-7 and, thus, elevated RAD52 transcription [15]. Considering the importance of the 12p13.33 RAD52 locus in lung cancer, we investigated the association between RAD52 genetic polymorphisms and SCLC risk using two large independent case-control studies.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

Two case-control sets (Jinan case-control set and Huaian case-control set) were included in the current study (Table 1). Jinan set: there were a total of 320 SCLC cases from Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (Jinan, Shandong Province, China) and sex- and age-matched 640 healthy controls. Patients were recruited between June 2009 and November 2014 at Shandong Cancer Hospital. Control subjects were randomly selected from a pool of 4500 individuals from a community cancer-screening program for early detection of cancer conducted in Jinan city as described in detail previously [16-18]. Huaian set: there were 200 SCLC cases from Huaian No. 2 Hospital (Huaian, Jiangsu Province, China) and sex- and age-matched (±5 years) 400 controls. Patients were consecutively recruited between January 2009 and January 2015 at Huaian No. 2 Hospital. Controls were cancer-free individuals selected from a community cancer-screening program (3600 individuals) for early detection of cancer conducted in Huaian city as described in detail previously [16-18]. Individuals who smoked one cigarette per day for over 1 year were considered as smokers. All subjects were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Huaian No. 2 Hospital and Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences. At recruitment, the written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Table 1.

Distribution of selected characteristics among SCLC cases and controls

Variable Huaian set Jinan set


Cases Controls P a Cases Controls P a


n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
200 400 320 640
Age (year)b 1.000 0.615
    ≤ 57 99 (49.5) 198 (49.5) 156 (48.9) 301 (47.0)
    > 57 101 (50.5) 202 (50.5) 164 (51.2) 339 (53.0)
Sex 0.479 0.480
    Male 148 (74.0) 285 (71.3) 251 (78.4) 489 (76.4)
    Female 52 (26.0) 115 (28.7) 69 (21.6) 151 (23.6)
Smoking status < 0.001 < 0.001
    Yes 157 (78.5) 113 (28.3) 249 (77.8) 219 (34.2)
    No 43 (21.5) 287 (71.8) 71 (22.2) 421 (65.8)
Clinical stagec
    Limited 113 (56.5) 182 (56.9)
    Extensive 87 (43.5) 138 (43.1)

Note: SCLC, small cell lung cancer.

a

Two-side χ2 test.

b

Median ages of patients for Shandong set and Jiangsu set are 57 years.

c

Classified according to the Veterans’ Administration Lung Study Group.

SNP selection and genotyping

Six RAD52 SNPs (rs10849605, rs1051669, rs10774474, rs11571378, rs7963551 and rs6489769) were included in this study. The selection criteria have been reported previously [19,20]. All RAD52 SNPs were analyzed by the Mass Array system (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, California, USA) as described previously [19,20]. A 5% blind, random sample of study subjects was genotyped in duplicates and the reproducibility was 100%.

Statistics

Pearson’s X2 test was used to calculate the differences in demographic variables and genotype distributions of RAD52 SNPs between SCLC cases and controls. Associations between RAD52 genotypes and SCLC risk by OR and their 95% CIs were examined utilizing unconditional logistic regression model. During calculating associations between functional candidate SNPs in RAD52 and SCLC risk in Huaian case-control set, we used the common genotypes of rs10849605 CC, rs1051669 GG, rs10774474 AA, rs11571378 TT, rs7963551 AA and rs6489769 TT as the reference genotypes. All ORs were adjusted for age, sex and smoking status, where it was appropriate. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistical significance, and all statistical tests were two-sided. All analyses were performed with SPSS software package (Version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Subject characteristics

We conducted a two-stage case-control study with a total of 520 SCLC cases and 1040 healthy controls. Parts of the two independent case-control sets have been described previously [16-18]. In brief, there were 200 primary SCLC patients in the discovery set recruited between January 2009 and January 2015 at Huaian No. 2 Hospital. In addition, we randomly selected 400 age (±5 years) and sex frequency-matched control subjects from a subject pool of 3600 individuals selected from a community cancer-screening program for early detection of cancer conducted in Huaian city as described in detail previously [16-18]. A total of 320 SCLC cases were enrolled in the validation set from Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (Jinan, Shandong Province, China) between June 2009 and November 2014. Also, we selected 640 controls who were frequency matched to the cases by sex and age (±5 years) from a pool of 4500 individuals from a community cancer-screening program for early detection of cancer conducted in Jinan city as described in detail previously [16-18]. Individuals who smoked one cigarette per day for over 1 year were considered as smokers. All subjects were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Huaian No. 2 Hospital and Shandong Cancer Hospital, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences. At recruitment, the written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Allelic frequencies and genotype distributions of functional RAD52 SNPs

The genotype frequencies of RAD52 candidate SNPs (rs10849605 C > T, rs1051669 G > A, rs10774474 A > T, rs11571378T > A, rs7963551 C > A and rs6489769 T > C) are shown in Table 2. The minor allele frequencies (MAFs) for rs10849605 T, rs1051669A, rs10774474T, rs11571378A, rs7963551A and rs6489769C were 0.665, 0.190, 0.307, 0.225, 0.206 and 0.500 in healthy control subjects in Huaian training case-control set. In SCLC cases, the MAFs for rs10849605 T, rs1051669A, rs10774474T, rs11571378A, rs7963551A and rs6489769C were 0.670, 0.193, 0.302, 0.216, 0.110 and 0.498 in the same case-control set. All observed genotype frequencies in either controls or cases conform to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Distributions of the rs10849605, rs1051669, rs10774474, rs11571378, rs7963551 and rs6489769 genotypes were then compared among cases and controls. Frequencies of rs7963551 CC, CA, and AA genotypes among SCLC cases differed significantly from those among controls (X2 = 16.41, P = 2.7×10-4, df = 2), with the frequency of AA homozygote being significantly lower among patients than among controls (11.0% vs. 20.6%). However, no statistically significant differences of rs10849605, rs1051669, rs10774474, rs11571378 and rs6489769 genotypes were observed between cases and control subjects (all P > 0.05) (Table 2). Therefore, we did no other analyses of these five SNPs in the next studies.

Table 2.

Associations between candidate RAD52 genetic variants and SCLC risk in Huaian case-control set (Training set)

No. rs ID Base change MAF1 Genotypes (200 SCLC cases and 400 healthy controls)

Common2 Heterozygous2 Rare2 OR (95% CI)3 P 3
1 rs10849605 C > T 0.665 25/50 82/168 93/182 0.98 (0.75-1.27) 0.862
2 rs1051669 G > A 0.190 134/271 55/106 11/23 0.98 (0.72-1.35) 0.917
3 rs10774474 A > T 0.307 94/188 90/178 15/34 0.12 (0.78-1.34) 0.859
4 rs11571378 T > A 0.225 121/236 70/147 8/16 1.04 (0.77-1.41) 0.768
5 rs7963551 C > A 0.206 161/258 34/119 5/23 0.48 (0.33-0.69) 3.4×10-5
6 rs6489769 T > C 0.500 51/100 99/200 50/100 1.02 (0.80-1.31) 0.870

Abbreviations: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

1

MAF in healthy controls.

2

Number of SCLC case/number of control.

3

Allelic OR calculated by logistic regression.

Association between RAD52 rs7963551 SNP and SCLC risk

Unconditional logistic regression analyses were utilized to calculate associations between genotypes of RAD52 rs7963551 C > A polymorphism and SCLC risk (Table 3). The RAD52 rs7963551A allele was shown to be a protective allele. Individuals with the rs7963551 CA genotype had an OR of 0.38 (95% CI = 0.24-0.62, P = 1.1×10-4) for developing SCLC in Huaian Set, compared with individual having the rs7963551 CC genotype. However, the rs7963551 AA genotype was not associated with decreased SCLC risk compared with the CC genotype (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.36-1.11, P = 0.113). In Jinan set, we observed that individuals with the rs7963551 CA genotype had a 0.69-fold decreased risk to develop SCLC compared to the CC genotype carriers (95% CI = 0.49-0.97, P = 0.032) (Table 3). However, there was no statistically significant association between the rs7963551 AA genotype and SCLC risk (OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.48-1.13, P = 0.162). In the combined analyses, we found that both rs7963551 CA and AA genotypes contributed to significantly decreased SCLC risk (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.74, P = 4.7×10-5, or OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49-0.97, P = 0.032) (Table 3). All ORs were calculated with adjustments of sex, age, and smoking status.

Table 3.

Genotype frequencies of RAD52 rs7963551 C > A genetic variant among patients and controls and their association with SCLC risk

Genotypes RAD52 rs7963551 C > A

Patients No. (%) Controls No. (%) OR (95% CI)a P-value
Huaian set n = 200 n = 400
CC 161 (80.5) 258 (64.5) Reference
CA 34 (17.0) 119 (29.8) 0.38 (0.24-0.62) 1.1×10-4
AA 5 (2.5) 23 (5.7) 0.64 (0.36-1.11) 0.113
Jinan set n = 320 n = 640
CC 234 (73.1) 415 (64.8) Reference
CA 78 (24.4) 199 (31.1) 0.69 (0.49-0.97) 0.032
AA 8 (2.5) 26 (4.1) 0.74 (0.48-1.13) 0.162
Total n = 520 n = 1040
CC 395 (76.0) 673 (64.7) Reference
CA 112 (21.5) 318 (30.6) 0.53 (0.43-0.74) 4.7×10-5
AA 13 (2.5) 49 (4.7) 0.69 (0.49-0.97) 0.032

Abbreviations: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Data were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex and smoking status.

Stratified analyses of association between RAD52 rs7963551 SNP and SCLC risk

Associations between RAD52 rs7963551 genotypes and SCLC risk by stratifying for age, sex, and smoking status were furtherer examined using the combined data of two case-control sets (Table 4). Significant associations were observed in most strata except for the subgroups of smoking status. In detail, nonsmokers carrying rs7963551 CA or AA genotype showed no significantly decreased risk to develop SCLC compared with CC carriers (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.47-1.14, P = 0.161). Among smokers, there were significant associations between rs7963551 CA and AA genotypes and SCLC risk (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.67, P = 1.0×10-5) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Risk of SCLC associated with RAD52 rs7963551 A > C genotypes by age, sex and smoking status

Variable RAD52 rs7963551 A > C

CC1 CA+AA1 OR (95% CI)2 P
Age (year)
    ≤ 57 190/328 65/171 0.63 (0.43-0.91) 0.015
    > 57 205/345 60/196 0.48 (0.33-0.70) 1.4×10-4
Sex
    Male 295/494 104/280 0.59 (0.44-0.79) 3.8×10-4
    Female 100/179 21/87 0.43 (0.23-0.79) 0.007
Smoking status
    No 84/472 30/236 0.73 (0.47-1.14) 0.161
    Yes 311/201 95/131 0.49 (0.35-0.67) 1.0×10-5
Clinical stage
    Limited 226/673 69/367 0.53 (0.38-0.73) 1.0×10-4
    Extensive 169/673 56/367 0.55 (0.39-0.78) 0.001

Abbreviations: SCLC, small cell lung cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

1

Number of case patients with genotype/number of control subjects with genotype.

2

Data were calculated by logistic regression, adjusted for sex, age, and smoking status, where it was appropriate.

Discussion

In the current study, we examined the association between the 12p13.33 RAD52 locus genetic variants and SCLC susceptibility in a two-stage case-control design. Interestingly, we only identified RAD52 3’-UTR rs7963551 polymorphism was significantly associated with decreased SCLC risk in the Chinese population. Stratified analyses of association between the RAD52 rs7963551 polymorphism and SCLC risk indicated that the functional genetic variant was only significantly associated with SCLC susceptibility among smokers but not nonsmokers.

In yeast, RAD52 was originally identified as a key member in recombination repair. Through involving in strand exchange and annealing of strands during homologous recombination (HR), RAD52 is predominantly recruited for DNA repair during S phase of the cell cycle [13,14]. In humans, RAD52, as a key member involved in the HR pathway, plays a crucial role in the regulation of HR-related genomic instability [21,22]. RAD52 depletion in human cells with the deficient RAD52, PALB2 or BRCA2 gene, is synthetically lethal via decreasing cell survival by reducing rates of homologous recombination and by increasing damage-induced chromosomal abnormalities [23-25]. However, the role of RAD52 in SCLC remains elusive. Recent GWASs indentified the 12p13.33 RAD52 locus as a lung cancer susceptibility locus in Caucasians, especially in squamous cell lung carcinoma and SCLC. However, it is still unclear whether the 12p13.33 RAD52 locus polymorphisms contribute to SCLC risk in the Chinese population. We found that the rs7963551 polymorphism locating in the let-7 target sequence of the RAD52 3’-UTR is associated with SCLC risk, perhaps through impacting RAD52 expression.

Several limitations may exist in this study. First, there might be bias of inherent selection since all cases were from the hospital in this hospital-based study. As a result, validation of our findings in a population-based prospective study is important. Second, the relative small sample size may limit the statistical power of this study.

In summary, our study elucidated that functional RAD52 rs7963551 polymorphism was associated with SCLC risk in Chinese populations, especially in smokers. Given this fact, further efforts are warranted to explore whether RAD52 rs7963551 genetic variant could be potentially useful for diagnosis of SCLC.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (2015AA020950); National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271382, 81201586); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (YS1407); the open project of State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology (SKL-KF-2015-05); Beijing Higher Education Young Elite Teacher Project (YETP0521); Innovation and Promotion Project of Beijing University of Chemical Technology.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jackman DM, Johnson BE. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2005;366:1385–1396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67569-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simon GR, Wagner H American College of Chest Physicians. Small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2003;123:259S–271S. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.259s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amos CI, Wu X, Broderick P, Gorlov IP, Gu J, Eisen T, Dong Q, Zhang Q, Gu X, Vijayakrishnan J, Sullivan K, Matakidou A, Wang Y, Mills G, Doheny K, Tsai YY, Chen WV, Shete S, Spitz MR, Houlston RS. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet. 2008;40:616–622. doi: 10.1038/ng.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hung RJ, McKay JD, Gaborieau V, Boffetta P, Hashibe M, Zaridze D, Mukeria A, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Lissowska J, Rudnai P, Fabianova E, Mates D, Bencko V, Foretova L, Janout V, Chen C, Goodman G, Field JK, Liloglou T, Xinarianos G, Cassidy A, McLaughlin J, Liu G, Narod S, Krokan HE, Skorpen F, Elvestad MB, Hveem K, Vatten L, Linseisen J, Clavel-Chapelon F, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Lund E, Martinez C, Bingham S, Rasmuson T, Hainaut P, Riboli E, Ahrens W, Benhamou S, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Holcátová I, Merletti F, Kjaerheim K, Agudo A, Macfarlane G, Talamini R, Simonato L, Lowry R, Conway DI, Znaor A, Healy C, Zelenika D, Boland A, Delepine M, Foglio M, Lechner D, Matsuda F, Blanche H, Gut I, Heath S, Lathrop M, Brennan P. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature. 2008;452:633–637. doi: 10.1038/nature06885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thorgeirsson TE, Geller F, Sulem P, Rafnar T, Wiste A, Magnusson KP, Manolescu A, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Ingason A, Stacey SN, Bergthorsson JT, Thorlacius S, Gudmundsson J, Jonsson T, Jakobsdottir M, Saemundsdottir J, Olafsdottir O, Gudmundsson LJ, Bjornsdottir G, Kristjansson K, Skuladottir H, Isaksson HJ, Gudbjartsson T, Jones GT, Mueller T, Gottsäter A, Flex A, Aben KK, de Vegt F, Mulders PF, Isla D, Vidal MJ, Asin L, Saez B, Murillo L, Blondal T, Kolbeinsson H, Stefansson JG, Hansdottir I, Runarsdottir V, Pola R, Lindblad B, van Rij AM, Dieplinger B, Haltmayer M, Mayordomo JI, Kiemeney LA, Matthiasson SE, Oskarsson H, Tyrfingsson T, Gudbjartsson DF, Gulcher JR, Jonsson S, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature. 2008;452:638–642. doi: 10.1038/nature06846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang Y, Broderick P, Webb E, Wu X, Vijayakrishnan J, Matakidou A, Qureshi M, Dong Q, Gu X, Chen WV, Spitz MR, Eisen T, Amos CI, Houlston RS. Common 5p15.33 and 6p21.33 variants influence lung cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1407–1409. doi: 10.1038/ng.273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McKay JD, Hung RJ, Gaborieau V, Boffetta P, Chabrier A, Byrnes G, Zaridze D, Mukeria A, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Lissowska J, Rudnai P, Fabianova E, Mates D, Bencko V, Foretova L, Janout V, McLaughlin J, Shepherd F, Montpetit A, Narod S, Krokan HE, Skorpen F, Elvestad MB, Vatten L, Njølstad I, Axelsson T, Chen C, Goodman G, Barnett M, Loomis MM, Lubiñski J, Matyjasik J, Lener M, Oszutowska D, Field J, Liloglou T, Xinarianos G, Cassidy A EPIC Study. Vineis P, Clavel-Chapelon F, Palli D, Tumino R, Krogh V, Panico S, González CA, Ramón Quirós J, Martínez C, Navarro C, Ardanaz E, Larrañaga N, Kham KT, Key T, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Trichopoulou A, Linseisen J, Boeing H, Hallmans G, Overvad K, Tjønneland A, Kumle M, Riboli E, Zelenika D, Boland A, Delepine M, Foglio M, Lechner D, Matsuda F, Blanche H, Gut I, Heath S, Lathrop M, Brennan P. Lung cancer susceptibility locus at 5p15.33. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1404–406. doi: 10.1038/ng.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y, McKay JD, Rafnar T, Wang Z, Timofeeva MN, Broderick P, Zong X, Laplana M, Wei Y, Han Y, Lloyd A, Delahaye-Sourdeix M, Chubb D, Gaborieau V, Wheeler W, Chatterjee N, Thorleifsson G, Sulem P, Liu G, Kaaks R, Henrion M, Kinnersley B, Vallée M, LeCalvez-Kelm F, Stevens VL, Gapstur SM, Chen WV, Zaridze D, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Lissowska J, Rudnai P, Fabianova E, Mates D, Bencko V, Foretova L, Janout V, Krokan HE, Gabrielsen ME, Skorpen F, Vatten L, Njølstad I, Chen C, Goodman G, Benhamou S, Vooder T, Välk K, Nelis M, Metspalu A, Lener M, Lubiński J, Johansson M, Vineis P, Agudo A, Clavel-Chapelon F, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Trichopoulos D, Khaw KT, Johansson M, Weiderpass E, Tjønneland A, Riboli E, Lathrop M, Scelo G, Albanes D, Caporaso NE, Ye Y, Gu J, Wu X, Spitz MR, Dienemann H, Rosenberger A, Su L, Matakidou A, Eisen T, Stefansson K, Risch A, Chanock SJ, Christiani DC, Hung RJ, Brennan P, Landi MT, Houlston RS, Amos CI. Rare variants of large effect in BRCA2 and CHEK2 affect risk of lung cancer. Nat Genet. 2014;46:736–741. doi: 10.1038/ng.3002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lan Q, Hsiung CA, Matsuo K, Hong YC, Seow A, Wang Z, Hosgood HD 3rd, Chen K, Wang JC, Chatterjee N, Hu W, Wong MP, Zheng W, Caporaso N, Park JY, Chen CJ, Kim YH, Kim YT, Landi MT, Shen H, Lawrence C, Burdett L, Yeager M, Yuenger J, Jacobs KB, Chang IS, Mitsudomi T, Kim HN, Chang GC, Bassig BA, Tucker M, Wei F, Yin Z, Wu C, An SJ, Qian B, Lee VH, Lu D, Liu J, Jeon HS, Hsiao CF, Sung JS, Kim JH, Gao YT, Tsai YH, Jung YJ, Guo H, Hu Z, Hutchinson A, Wang WC, Klein R, Chung CC, Oh IJ, Chen KY, Berndt SI, He X, Wu W, Chang J, Zhang XC, Huang MS, Zheng H, Wang J, Zhao X, Li Y, Choi JE, Su WC, Park KH, Sung SW, Shu XO, Chen YM, Liu L, Kang CH, Hu L, Chen CH, Pao W, Kim YC, Yang TY, Xu J, Guan P, Tan W, Su J, Wang CL, Li H, Sihoe AD, Zhao Z, Chen Y, Choi YY, Hung JY, Kim JS, Yoon HI, Cai Q, Lin CC, Park IK, Xu P, Dong J, Kim C, He Q, Perng RP, Kohno T, Kweon SS, Chen CY, Vermeulen R, Wu J, Lim WY, Chen KC, Chow WH, Ji BT, Chan JK, Chu M, Li YJ, Yokota J, Li J, Chen H, Xiang YB, Yu CJ, Kunitoh H, Wu G, Jin L, Lo YL, Shiraishi K, Chen YH, Lin HC, Wu T, Wu YL, Yang PC, Zhou B, Shin MH, Fraumeni JF Jr, Lin D, Chanock SJ, Rothman N. Genome-wide association analysis identifies new lung cancer susceptibility loci in never-smoking women in Asia. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1330–1335. doi: 10.1038/ng.2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dong J, Hu Z, Wu C, Guo H, Zhou B, Lv J, Lu D, Chen K, Shi Y, Chu M, Wang C, Zhang R, Dai J, Jiang Y, Cao S, Qin Z, Yu D, Ma H, Jin G, Gong J, Sun C, Zhao X, Yin Z, Yang L, Li Z, Deng Q, Wang J, Wu W, Zheng H, Zhou G, Chen H, Guan P, Peng Z, Chen Y, Shu Y, Xu L, Liu X, Liu L, Xu P, Han B, Bai C, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Yan Y, Amos CI, Chen F, Tan W, Jin L, Wu T, Lin D, Shen H. Association analyses identify multiple new lung cancer susceptibility loci and their interactions with smoking in the Chinese population. Nat Genet. 2012;44:895–899. doi: 10.1038/ng.2351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hu Z, Wu C, Shi Y, Guo H, Zhao X, Yin Z, Yang L, Dai J, Hu L, Tan W, Li Z, Deng Q, Wang J, Wu W, Jin G, Jiang Y, Yu D, Zhou G, Chen H, Guan P, Chen Y, Shu Y, Xu L, Liu X, Liu L, Xu P, Han B, Bai C, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Yan Y, Ma H, Chen J, Chu M, Lu F, Zhang Z, Chen F, Wang X, Jin L, Lu J, Zhou B, Lu D, Wu T, Lin D, Shen H. A genome-wide association study identifies two new lung cancer susceptibility loci at 13q12.12 and 22q12.2 in Han Chinese. Nat Genet. 2011;43:792–796. doi: 10.1038/ng.875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shi J, Chatterjee N, Rotunno M, Wang Y, Pesatori AC, Consonni D, Li P, Wheeler W, Broderick P, Henrion M, Eisen T, Wang Z, Chen W, Dong Q, Albanes D, Thun M, Spitz MR, Bertazzi PA, Caporaso NE, Chanock SJ, Amos CI, Houlston RS, Landi MT. Inherited variation at chromosome 12p13.33, including RAD52, influences the risk of squamous cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:131–139. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Timofeeva MN, Hung RJ, Rafnar T, Christiani DC, Field JK, Bickeböller H, Risch A, McKay JD, Wang Y, Dai J, Gaborieau V, McLaughlin J, Brenner D, Narod SA, Caporaso NE, Albanes D, Thun M, Eisen T, Wichmann HE, Rosenberger A, Han Y, Chen W, Zhu D, Spitz M, Wu X, Pande M, Zhao Y, Zaridze D, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Lissowska J, Rudnai P, Fabianova E, Mates D, Bencko V, Foretova L, Janout V, Krokan HE, Gabrielsen ME, Skorpen F, Vatten L, Njølstad I, Chen C, Goodman G, Lathrop M, Benhamou S, Vooder T, Välk K, Nelis M, Metspalu A, Raji O, Chen Y, Gosney J, Liloglou T, Muley T, Dienemann H, Thorleifsson G, Shen H, Stefansson K, Brennan P, Amos CI, Houlston R, Landi MT Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL) Research Team. Influence of common genetic variation on lung cancer risk: meta-analysis of 14 900 cases and 29 485 controls. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:4980–4995. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang Y, Qin Z, Hu Z, Guan X, Wang Y, He Y, Xue J, Liu X, Chen J, Dai J, Jin G, Ma H, Wang S, Shen H. Genetic variation in a hsa-let-7 binding site in RAD52 is associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:689–693. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shi J, Sun F, Peng L, Li B, Liu L, Zhou C, Han J, Zhang L, Zhou L, Zhang X, Pu H, Tong L, Yuan Q, Song X, Yang M. Leukocyte telomere length-related genetic variants in 1p34.2 and 14q21 loci contribute to the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:2799–2807. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu L, Zhou C, Zhou L, Peng L, Li D, Zhang X, Zhou M, Kuang P, Yuan Q, Song X, Yang M. Functional FEN1 genetic variants contribute to risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:119–123. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang X, Zhou L, Fu G, Sun F, Shi J, Wei J, Lu C, Zhou C, Yuan Q, Yang M. The identification of an ESCC susceptibility SNP rs920778 that regulates the expression of lncRNA HOTAIR via a novel intronic enhancer. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:2062–2067. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Z, Guo Y, Zhou L, Ge Y, Wei L, Li L, Zhou C, Wei J, Yuan Q, Li J, Yang M. Association of a functional RAD52 genetic variant locating in a miRNA binding site with risk of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54:853–8. doi: 10.1002/mc.22156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lu C, Chen YD, Han S, Wei J, Ge Y, Pan W, Jiang T, Qiu XG, Yang M. A RAD52 genetic variant located in a miRNA binding site is associated with glioma risk in Han Chinese. J Neurooncol. 2014;120:11–17. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1527-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lok BH, Powell SN. Molecular pathways: understanding the role of Rad52 in homologous recombination for therapeutic advancement. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6400–6406. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Singleton MR, Wentzell LM, Liu Y, West SC, Wigley DB. Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13492–13497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212449899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jensen RB, Carreira A, Kowalczykowski SC. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nature. 2010;467:678–683. doi: 10.1038/nature09399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lok BH, Carley AC, Tchang B, Powell SN. RAD52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with deficiencies in BRCA1 and PALB2 in addition to BRCA2 through RAD51-mediated homologous recombination. Oncogene. 2013;32:3552–3558. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Feng Z, Scott SP, Bussen W, Sharma GG, Guo G, Pandita TK, Powell SN. Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:686–691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010959107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES