Skip to main content
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo logoLink to Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
. 2015 Sep-Oct;57(5):393–396. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652015000500004

ISOLATION AND MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIALLY PATHOGENIC Escherichia coli AND Campylobacter jejuni IN FERAL PIGEONS FROM AN URBAN AREA IN THE CITY OF LIMA, PERU

Isolamento e detecção de Escherichia coli e Campylobacter jejunipotencialmente patogênicos em pombos selvagens de uma área urbana na cidade de Lima, Perú

Moisés CABALLERO 1, Isabel RIVERA 1, Luis M JARA 1, Francisco M ULLOA-STANOJLOVIC 2, Carlos SHIVA 1
PMCID: PMC4660447  PMID: 26603225

SUMMARY

Feral pigeons (Columbia livia) live in close contact with humans and other animals. They can transmit potentially pathogenic and zoonotic agents. The objective of this study was to isolate and detect strains of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Campylobacter jejuni of urban feral pigeons from an area of Lima, Peru. Fresh dropping samples from urban parks were collected for microbiological isolation of E. coli strains in selective agar, and Campylobacter by filtration method. Molecular identification of diarrheagenic pathotypes of E.coli and Campylobacter jejuni was performed by PCR. Twenty-two parks were sampled and 16 colonies of Campylobacter spp. were isolated. The 100% of isolates were identified as Campylobacter jejuni. Furthermore, 102 colonies of E. coliwere isolated and the 5.88% resulted as Enteropathogenic (EPEC) type and 0.98% as Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). The urban feral pigeons of Lima in Peru can act as a reservoir or carriers of zoonotic potentially pathogenic enteric agents.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Diarrhea, Zoonoses, PCR

INTRODUCTION

The feral pigeons (Columbia livia) live in urban and rural areas, in close contact with humans and other animals. In recent years, the population growth of feral pigeons has increased their interest in public health, because it could represent a reservoir of transmissible pathogens by air and through contaminated food or water29.

Among the zoonoses that could be transmitted by pigeons, the most important are chlamydiosis, cryptococcosis, aspergillosis and enterobacteriosis, which include pathogenic Escherichia coli and species of Campylobacter, Salmonella and Listeria 1. Five main pathotypes of diarrheagenic E. coli have been described, enterotoxigenic (ETEC), enteropathogenic (EPEC), enteroaggregative (EAEC), enteroinvasive (EIEC) and the zoonotic enterohemorrhagic (EHEC or STEC), which produce a Shiga-like toxin that leads to hemolytic uremic syndrome33. Some studies show that enterohemorrhagic serotype O157:H7 of E. coli can be present in feral pigeons15 , 28. Moreover, in Peru there have been reported outbreaks of human enterohaemorrhagic colibacilosis from unknown sources of infection13, although prevalence of STEC in children is up to 9% while EPEC is higher21.

Thermotolerant Campylobacter species have become important, especially as agents of infectious diarrhea, with even more cases per year than salmonellosis and shigellosis11 , 33. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coliare the most frequent cause of diarrhea in childhood groups, the fecal-oral route being the main route of transmission3 , 6. Even more, Campylobacter has been isolated from river and waste water, chickens and pets32. In Lima, C. jejuni was reported as responsible for the 13.3% of the acute human diarrhea diagnosed in local hospital centers25.

There are no studies about the prevalence of zoonotic diarrheagenic agents in urban birds in the city of Lima, Peru. Their population has increased in recent years and the close contact with people in public places, especially with children, requires knowledge of the epidemiological status of potential pathogenic E. coli and Campylobacter in feral pigeons. Given this context, the objective of this study was to isolate and identify the presence of Campylobacter jejuni and diarrheagenic E. coli in feral pigeons from an urban area in the city of Lima, Peru, through the microbiological isolation and molecular identification by a conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling: droppings samples, from healthy adult feral pigeons, were collected in parks (22) of a midwest area of the city of Lima (Pueblo Libre), Peru, in the summer (December to April) of 2012. Sterile plastics with food were extended on the ground of each park, and a swab of fresh droppings from each pigeon (about 30 animals per park) was obtained. Swabs were placed in a Stuart transport medium and then were stored at 4 °C for 24 hours.

Microbiological and molecular identification:samples for E. coli isolation were seeded and cultured in MacConkey agar by the streaking culture technique and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours in aerobiosis. Samples for Campylobacter were suspended in 1 mL of saline solution and inoculated into a cellulose filter (0.45 µm) on blood agar and then incubated for 72 hours at 42 °C under microaerophilic conditions22. According to biochemical patterns and modified Gram staining with fuchsin, E. coliand Campylobacter were presumptive identified respectively34. The extraction of genomic DNA of each colony was performed by the kit Wizard Genomic DNA Purification for Gram-negative bacteria, according to the supplier's instructions (Promega, USA).

For the molecular identification of diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes, a multiplex PCR performed with previously described primers of intimin (eae), Shiga toxin (stx1, stx2) and hemolysin (hlyA) was used23. As well for the C. jejuni identification, the previously described primers forward 5'- TGACGCTAGTGTTGTAGGAG - 3' and reverse 5'-CCATCATCGCTAAGTGCAAC-3' were used in a conventional PCR20. Diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes were classified according to the presence of virulence factors eae for EPEC and stx1/stx2 for STEC21. The prevalence was expressed as a percentage according to the pathotype found in the total of isolates.

RESULTS

From all samples seeded on blood agar, 16 colonies were isolated showing microscopic characteristics such as small size, pinpoint morphology, non-hemolytic, and Gram-negative "gull-wing" shaped bacilli at Gram staining. One hundred percent of colonies suggestive of Campylobacter were positive in PCR identification as C. jejuni (Fig. 1). Likewise, 110 colonies of E. coli were isolated from McConkey agar, of which only 102 were confirmed by biochemical tests. The 6.86% of the E. coli strains amplified had one or more virulent genes, of which 5.88% belonged to the EPEC group and 0.98% to the STEC group (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. - Gel electrophoresis of C. jejuni samples from feral pigeons. Ladder 100 bp (1); blank (2), negative control, E. coli ATCC 25922 (3); positive control, C. jejuni No. 1503-2012 (4); positive colonies (5-21). PCR product: 402 bp16 .

Fig. 1

Table. 1 Classification of pathogenic E. coli isolates.

Virulence factors a Pathotype of E. coli No. of colonies b
eae stx1 stx2 hylA
+ - - - EPEC 6 (5.88%)
- + + - STEC 1 (0.98%)
Total 7 (6.86%)

a + presence of gene; - absence of gene; b From a total of 102 E. coli isolates.

Fig. 2. - Gel electrophoresis of diarrheagenic E. coli samples from feral pigeons. Ladder 100 bp (1); positive control E. coli O157:H7 (2), negative control E. coli ATCC 25922 (3); blank (4), positive colonies EPEC (5,7-11); positive colony STEC (6). PCR products: 180 bp (stx1), 255 bp (stx2), 384 bp (eae) and 534 bp (hylA)15 .

Fig. 2

DISCUSSION

This study represents the first report of potentially pathogenic agents isolated from urban feral pigeons in Lima, Peru. The results indicate that these birds, settled in different parks, can serve as a reservoir of zoonotic C. jejuniand STEC, as well as EPEC. Although the isolation and molecular identification methodology was similar to previous studies, and there were no differences among parks tested, the prevalence obtained may differ by the number of samples collected and sampling areas, among other investigated factors.

The presence of Campylobacter jejuni has been documented worldwide in urban birds. In Spain this was found, with 69.1% in contrast to 1.1% of C. coli 32. Also in Sweden, a study found 3% of prevalence of C. jejuni 19, while in Chile a 7% was found10. In Bolivia a 29% of frequency for Campylobacter spp. was obtained and 57% was confirmed as C. jejuni 2. And in the Peruvian jungle, C. jejuni was found in 8% of the domestic chickens sampled31.

The role of Campylobacter in the etiology of human enteric disease has been established in developing countries, and there is a consensus that the environment and level of sanitary care are crucial in infections11. In USA, the 15% of Campylobacter infections have been due to contact with pets18, with a wide range of reservoirs among mammals and birds present in the surroundings. As reported, C. jejuniisolates from clinically healthy homing pigeons can invade human enterocytes in vitro 30. In some prevalence studies about human diarrhea in Peru, Campylobacter has been isolated more frequently from children. In the north of Lima, a study showed that 10% of patients with diarrhea were carriers of the bacteria, C. coli (5%), followed by C. jejuni (2.9%) and C. lari(2.1%) being the most frequently observed among children under the age of 55. Furthermore, in clinical samples from some hospitals in Lima, 37 positive cases for Campylobacter spp. were obtained from children under one year-old14. However, a previous study indicated that exposure to the domestic poultry feces was the predominant risk factor for diarrhea in children12.

The presence of pathogenic E. coli in urban feral pigeons has been reported mainly in developed countries as USA where 7.9% of the isolates corresponded to the STEC group24; whereas in the present study less than 1% was obtained. Other studies in Brazil showed that EPEC and ETEC were present in around 12.1% of feral pigeon droppings29. In Finland, the EPEC group presented a prevalence of 7%16, similar to the results of the present study where EPEC represented 5.88% of the total isolations. Recently, in Spain they reported the EPEC group (6%) from urban pigeons, but no STEC was found, in contrast with our study where STEC was isolated27. According to a study in Lima, where 113 isolates of E. coliwere collected from human diarrheic feces, 13.3% carried the eae gene (EPEC group); in addition, strains of ETEC, STEC, EAEC and EIEC21 were found. Conversely, the implication of EPEC and STEC groups in neonatal diarrhea has been demonstrated in livestock, STEC being of zoonotic importance. In addition, it has been suggested that saprophytic E. coli strains, in exchanging genetic material from different sources, could become pathogenic if they acquire genetic sequences for specific virulence factors17. Thus, it is suggested that intestinal isolates from healthy birds could cause disease in susceptible hosts, depending on the combination of the virulence factors that occur4.

It is known that direct and indirect contact with animals and food products may be of importance in the transmission of human STEC infections, especially of serotype O157:H7, which has been isolated from chickens and wild birds7 , 9. However, this study could not demonstrate the presence of E. coliSTEC with more virulence genes than eae or hylA, which would have suggested a zoonotic enterohemorrhagic serotype. On the other hand, contamination of the environment is an important factor to consider with respect to the exposition to STEC in farm animals, which would keep the epidemiological cycle of pathogenic strains26. It is also known that the water that is used to irrigate many urban parks does not receive an adequate treatment, if they receive it at all, and serves as drinking water for animals, which could sustain the persistence of many enteropathogens in urban birds and its presence on human diarrhea, as has been suggested in a epidemiological study in a collective community in Israel8.

The results of this study show, for the first time, the epidemiological status of diarrheagenic and zoonotic bacteria in urban feral pigeons of Lima, Peru. Further studies exploring previous exposure to birds or animal feces, antibiotic resistance profile in birds strains, and genotyping and phylogeny analysis between strains of human and animal source may contribute to fulfill the lack of epidemiological data in the country, and alert the national health authorities for the need of establishing preventive and control measures in order to reduce the possible causes of potential zoonoses.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank BSc. Maribel Riveros (Laboratorio de Enfermedades Entéricas, Instituto de Medicina Tropical "Alexander von Humboldt", Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia) for providing a reference strain of Campylobacter jejuni, and Dr. Lorena Mori (Laboratorio de Microbiología, Facultad de Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia), for providing Escherichia coli serotype O157: H7 DNA.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abulreesh HH. Free living rock pigeon (Columba livia) as an environmental reservoir of enteric bacterial pathogens resistant to antimicrobial drugs in Saudi Arabia. Curr Res Bacteriol. 2011;4:28–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bautista-Mollo GW, Barra-Clavijo R, Aruquipa-Castro RM, Acarapi-Villanueva GA, Aroja-Santos M, Balboa-Silva P. Pesquisa deCampylobacterspp. en heces de palomas y gallinas. Scientifica. 2009;7:26–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bellido-Blasco J, González-Cano J, Galiano-Arlandis J, Herrero-Carot C, Tirado-Balaguer M, Arnedo-Pena A. Factores de riesgo de los casos esporádicos de diarrea porCampylobacter,Salmonellay rotavirus en niños preescolares. An Pediatr (Barc) 2007;66:367–374. doi: 10.1157/13101241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carranza C, León R, Falcón N, Neumann A, Kromm C. Caracterización y distribución de cepas deEscherichia colipotencialmente patógenas aisladas de pollos broiler de explotaciones avícolas en el Perú. Rev Investig Vet Perú. 2012;23:209–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Castillo M, Gómez F, Laos M, Salinas M. Campylobacterspp. en pacientes con cuadro diarreico que acudieron a hospitales de la ciudad de Ica, Perú. Marzo-mayo 1999. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Pública. 2003;20:S6–S6. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coker A, Isokpehi RD, Thomas BN, Amisu KO, Obi CL. Human campylobacteriosis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:237–244. doi: 10.3201/eid0803.010233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doyle MP, Schoeni JL. Isolation ofEscherichia coliO157:H7 from retail fresh meats and poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2394–2396. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.10.2394-2396.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fattal B, Wax Y, Davies M, Shuval HI. Health risks associated with wastewater irrigation: an epidemiological study. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:977–979. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.8.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ferens WA, Hovde CJ. Escherichia coliO157:H7: animal reservoir and sources of human infection. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011;8:465–487. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fernández H, Gesche W, Montefusco A, Schlatter R. Wild birds as reservoir of thermophilic enteropathogenicCampylobacterspecies in southern Chile. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1996;91:699–700. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761996000600007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernández H. Campylobactery campylobacteriosis: una mirada desde America del Sur. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2011;28:121–127. doi: 10.1590/s1726-46342011000100019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grados O, Bravo N, Black R, Butzlers J. Diarrea pediátrica porCampylobacterdebida a la exposición doméstica a pollos vivos en Lima, Perú. Bol Of Sanit Panam. 1989;106:205–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huapaya B, Huguet J, Suárez V, Torres Y, Montoya Y, Salazar E. Primer aislamiento deEscherichia coli O157:H7 enterohemorrágica en el Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2001;18:38–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hurtado L, Rojas R. Incidencia deCampylobactersp. en pacientes de ambulatorios menores de cinco años con diarrea aguda en dos hospitales de Lima: octubre 2005-enero 2006. Lima: Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad Nacional Mayor De San Marcos; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeffrey JS, Atwill ER, Hunter A. Prevalence ofCampylobacterandSalmonellaat a squab (young pigeon) processing plant. Poult Sci. 2001;80:151–155. doi: 10.1093/ps/80.2.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kobayashi H, Pohjanvirta T, Pelkonen S. Prevalence and characteristics of intimin- and Shiga toxin-producingEscherichia colifrom gulls, pigeons and broilers in Finland. J Vet Med Sci. 2002;64:1071–1073. doi: 10.1292/jvms.64.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leimbach A, Hacker J, Dobrindt U. E. colias an all-rounder: the thin line between commensalism and pathogenicity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2013;358:3–32. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lenz J, Joffe D, Kauffman M, Zhang Y, LeJeune J. Perceptions, practices, and consequences associated with foodborne pathogens and the feeding of raw meat to dogs. Can Vet J. 2009;50:637–643. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lillehaug A, Monceyron-Jonassen C, Bergsjø B, Hofshagen M, Tharaldsen J, Nesse LL. Screening of feral pigeon (Colomba livia), Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) and Graylag Goose (Anser anser) populations forCampylobacterspp.,Salmonellaspp., avian influenza virus and avian paramyxovirus. Acta Vet Scand. 2005;46:193–202. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-46-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.NG L-K, Kingombe CI, Yan W, Taylor DE, Hiratsuka K, Malik N. Specific detection and confirmation ofCampylobacter jejuniby DNA hybridization and PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:4558–4563. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.11.4558-4563.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ochoa T, Contreras C, Mosquito S. Alcances sobre la situación epidemiológica de lasE coli diarreogénicas aisladas de niños peruanos. . Can Pediatr. 2010;34:133–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patiño L. Estudio comparativo entre la microscopía convencional y el método de cultivo con microfiltros para la identificación delCampylobactersp. en muestras fecales de pacientes del HNGAI durante el 2° semestre del 2002. Lima: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Paton AW, Paton JC. Detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenicEscherichia coliby using multiplex PCR assays forstx1,stx2,eaeA, enterohemorrhagicE. coli hlyA,rfbO111, andrfbO157. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:598–602. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.2.598-602.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pedersen K, Clark L, Andelt WF, Salman MD. Prevalence of Shiga toxin-producingEscherichia coliandSalmonella entérica in rock pigeons captured in Fort Collins, Colorado. J Wildl Dis. 2006;42:46–55. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-42.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perales M, Camiña M, Quiñones C. Infección porCampylobacteryShigellacomo causa de diarrea aguda acuosa en niños menores de dos años en el distrito de La Victoria, Lima-Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2002;19:186–192. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rivera FP, Sotelo E, Morales I, Menacho F, Medina AM, Evaristo R. Short communication: detection of Shiga toxin-producingEscherichia coli(STEC) in healthy cattle and pigs in Lima, Perú. J Dairy Sci. 2012;95:1166–1169. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sacristán C, Esperón F, Herrera-León S, Iglesias I, Neves E, Nogal V. Virulence genes, antibiotic resistance and integrons inEscherichia colistrains isolated from synanthropic birds from Spain. Avian Pathol. 2014;43:172–175. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2014.897683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Santaniello A, Gargiulo A, Borrelli L, Dipineto L, Cuomo A, Sensale M. Survey of Shiga toxin-producingEscherichia coliO157:H7 in urban pigeons (Columba livia)in the city of Napoli, Italy. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007;6:313–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Silva V, Nicoli JR, Nascimento TC, Diniz CG. DiarrheagenicEscherichia colistrains recovered from urban pigeons (Columba livia) in Brazil and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. Curr Microbiol. 2009;59:302–308. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9434-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Teske L, Ryll M, Rubbenstroth D, Hänel I, Hartmann M, Kreienbrock L. Epidemiological investigations on the possible risk of distribution of zoonotic bacteria through apparently healthy homing pigeons. Avian Pathol. 2013;42:397–407. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2013.822468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tresierra-Ayala A, Bendayan M, Bernuy A, Pereyra G, Espinoza F. Campylobacterstermotolerantes en aves de corral de la ciudad de Iquitos. Folia Amazon. 1995;7:187–194. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vázquez B, Esperón F, Neves E, López J, Ballesteros C, Muñoz MJ. Screening for several potential pathogens in feral pigeons (Columba livia) in Madrid. Acta Vet Scand. 2010;52:45–45. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wasteson Y. ZoonoticEscherichia coli . Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 2001;95:79–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Winn W, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberg P.Koneman: diagnóstico microbiológico, texto y atlas en color taBuenos Aires: Médica Panamericana; 2008 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo are provided here courtesy of Instituto De Medicina Tropical De Sao Paulo

RESOURCES