Abstract
Secondary phosphine oxides react with vinyl sulfides (both alkyl- and aryl-substituted sulfides) under aerobic and solvent-free conditions (80 °C, air, 7–30 h) to afford 1-hydroxy-2-(organosulfanyl)ethyl(diorganyl)phosphine oxides in 70–93% yields.
Keywords: addition, green method, phosphine oxides, regioselectivity, vinyl sulfides
Findings
Tertiary phosphines and phosphine chalcogenides are important organophosphorus compounds that are widely used in industry, organic synthesis, polymer science, medicinal and coordination chemistry [1–4]. Therefore, the synthesis of these compounds has attracted a great interest and numerous synthetic methods have been developed [5–7]. Among them, the addition of P(X)–H (X = none, O, S or Se) to diverse alkenes is one of the most powerful and 100% atom-economic approaches to construct new C–P bonds, that provide straightforward access to tertiary phosphines and their chalcogenides [8–12]. Conventionally, the activation of the P–H bonds in this reaction is achieved by using radical initiators [13–15], Brønsted/Lewis acids [16–17] and bases [18–20] as well as transition metal catalysts [21–23]. Also, examples of the microwave-assisted [24–25] and photoinduced [26] addition are described.
Recently, on example of secondary phosphines [27] as well as secondary phosphine sulfides [28] and selenides [29], it has been disclosed that the addition of P–H species to the C=C bonds readily proceeds in the absence of any catalyst or initiator (Scheme 1). The reactions occur under mild solvent-free conditions (70–80 °C, inert atmosphere, 3–15 h) to chemo- and regioselectively furnish the anti-Markovnikov adducts in excellent yields (up to 99%). The substrate scope includes both EDG- and EWG-substituted alkenes [27–29].
Scheme 1.
Non-catalyzed addition of P–H species to alkenes.
In this letter, we report our serendipitous finding that secondary phosphine oxides 1a–f under aerobic conditions (air, 80 °C, 7–18 h) easily add to vinyl sulfides 2a–c to give unknown 1-hydroxy-2-(organosulfanyl)ethyl(diorganyl)phosphine oxides 3a–h in high yields (Table 1). The 10% excess of 2a–c relative to 1a–f is found to be optimal since the equimolar ratio of the reactants leads to incomplete conversion of the secondary phosphine oxides.
Table 1.
The substrate scope for the aerobic addition of phosphine oxides 1a–f to vinyl sulfides 2a–c.a
![]() | ||||
| Entry | Phosphine oxide | Vinyl sulfide | Time, h | Phosphine oxide 3a–h (yield, %)b |
| 1 |
![]() 1a |
![]() 2a |
16 |
![]() 3a (80%) |
| 2 |
![]() 1a |
![]() 2b |
30 |
![]() 3b (78%) |
| 3 | Ph2P(O)H 1b |
![]() 2c |
7 |
![]() 3c (70%) |
| 4 |
![]() 1a |
![]() 2c |
11 |
![]() 3d (91%) |
| 5 |
![]() 1c |
![]() 2c |
15 |
![]() 3e (93%) |
| 6 |
![]() 1d |
![]() 2c |
15 |
![]() 3f (90%) |
| 7 |
![]() 1e |
![]() 2c |
15 |
![]() 3g (82%) |
| 8 |
![]() 1f |
![]() 2c |
18 |
![]() 3h (89%) |
aReaction conditions: secondary phosphine oxide 1a–f (1.0 mmol), vinyl sulfide 2a–c (1.1 mmol) at 80 °C for 7–30 h under air. bIsolated yield based on 1a–f.
Importantly, under these conditions, the expected [30] anti-Markovnikov adducts are not observed in detectable amounts (31P NMR). The main byproducts are phosphinic acids, R2P(O)OH, formed by air oxidation of secondary phosphine oxides 1a–f. As seen from Table 1, the reaction is applicable to both aryl- (1b) and arylalkyl-substituted (1a,c–e) secondary phosphine oxides. The furyl-containing phosphine oxide 1f can also be reacted under these reaction conditions. On the other hand, vinyl sulfides bearing alkyl (2a,b) and aryl (2c) substituents successfully participate in the reaction to provide the corresponding phosphine oxides 3a–h. The latter were isolated as air- and moisture-stable powders (3a–f) or oils (3g,h), soluble in common organic solvents. Their structures have been established by X-ray diffraction (for 3d, Figure 1), NMR (1H, 13C, 31P, 1H,13C-HSQC) and FTIR techniques.
Figure 1.
ORTEP drawing (30% thermal ellipsoid) of phosphine oxide 3d. A CIF file with the crystallographic data is available as Supporting Information File 1 and is also available on request from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as deposition 1046604.
The presence of an asymmetric carbon atom in the reaction products leads to non-equivalence of both heminal protons in the SCH2C* fragment and carbon signals in the arylethyl moiety. In the 1H NMR spectra of 3a–h, protons of the PCHCH2S moiety form an ABMX spin system appearing as three multiplets.
Phosphine oxide 3d crystallizes in the centrosymmetric P21/c space group. Within its extended structure, strong intermolecular H-bonding interactions between the O–H hydrogen and P=O oxygen atom of a second molecule {O(1)–H(1)···O(2), 1.80(6) Å; O–H···O angle, 174.9(7)°} leads to the formation of 1D polymeric chains along the b-axis (Figure S1, Supporting Information File 2).
In FTIR spectra of 3a–h, absorption bands of the P=O and O–H bonds appear in the regions of 1100–1150 and 3350–3450 cm−1, respectively.
Interestingly, the reaction disclosed is specific for secondary phosphine oxides. Our experiments have shown that their analogues, secondary phosphine sulfides, under similar conditions provide exclusively the anti-Markovnikov adducts (Scheme 2). On the other hand, vinyl ethers and vinyl selenides (congeners of vinyl sulfides) were found to react with phosphine oxide 1a at 80 °C for about 30 and 20 h, respectively, to deliver difficult-to-separate mixtures of organophosphorus compounds (31P NMR).
Scheme 2.
Addition of secondary phosphine sulfide to vinyl sulfide under aerobic catalyst-free conditions.
To gain a primary insight into the reaction mechanism, several experiments were carried out. On example of phosphine oxide 1a and vinyl sulfide 2c, we have shown that the reaction proceeds in the dark with the same efficiency as in the light. Therefore, the photochemical pathway of the reaction is hardly probable. Also, the reaction was established under an argon atmosphere. Under these conditions (argon, 80 °C for 18 h, exemplified by 1a/2c pair) the formation of products 3a–h does not take place and the starting phosphine oxide remained almost intact (31P NMR). This indicates that the reaction requires the presence of oxygen. In the other experiment, when TEMPO, a widely used radical scavenger, was added (10 mol %) into the reaction system 1a/2c, the product 3d was also formed, however, a longer reaction time was required for complete conversion of secondary phosphine oxide 1a as compared to TEMPO-free conditions (15 vs 11 h). Meanwhile, this observation does not completely exclude a radical mechanism since the cross-coupling reactions between TEMPO and radical intermediates can be reversible [31]. In future, we intend to check various radical scavengers (other than TEMPO) in order to better understand the reaction mechanism.
Taking these data into account, the following mechanism is suggested (Scheme 3). The first step is assumed to be the generation of phosphinoyl (A) and hydroperoxyl (HOO•) radicals by the reaction of O2 with phosphine oxide 1. Earlier, the transfer of a hydrogen atom from the P(O)H species to molecular oxygen has been reported for example for Ph2P(O)H [30]. Then, the radical addition of A to vinyl sulfide, proceeding in an anti-Markovnikov manner, takes place. Subsequently, a 1,2-intramolecular transfer of an H atom within the radical adduct B (from PCH2 group to radical center) leads to the formation of R2P(O)-stabilized radical C. The latter recombines with a hydroperoxide radical to afford the metastable hydroperoxide D, thermal decomposition of which give rise to the final product 3.
Scheme 3.

Putative mechanism.
Although quantum chemical computations [MP2/6-311++G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)] of the model radicals B and C (with R, R' = Me) reveals that the latter is energetically less preferred than the former, their energy difference is too small (4.38 kcal/mol) to completely prohibit the B→C transformation.
Conclusion
In summary, we have disclosed an aerobic addition of secondary phosphine oxides to vinyl sulfides under solvent- and catalyst-free conditions, which provides an efficient approach to hitherto unknown 1-hydroxy-2-(organosulfanyl)ethyl(diorganyl)phosphine oxides in one step. The synthesized phosphine oxides, bearing hydroxy and sulfide functions, represent prospective building blocks for organic synthesis and interesting ligands for metal complexes. The results obtained contribute to the basic chemistry of both phosphine oxides and vinyl sulfides.
Supporting Information
General remarks, experimental procedure and characterization data; crystallographic information for 3d; 1H, 13C & 31P NMR spectra of synthesized compounds.
CIF file of compound 3d.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by leading scientific schools by the President of the Russian Federation (Grant NSh-156.2014.3).
References
- 1.Goldwhite H. Introduction to Phosphorus Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Quin L D. A Guide to Organophosphorus Chemistry. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peruzzini M, Gonsalvi L. Phosphorus Compounds, Advanced Tools in Catalysis and Materials Science, Catalysis by Metal Complexes. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kamer P C J, van Leeuwen P W N M. Phosphorus(III) Ligands in Homogeneous Catalysis: Design and Synthesis. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons; 2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hartley F R. Phosphine Oxides, Sulphides, Selenides and Tellurides. Vol. 2. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons; 1992. ((The Chemistry of Organophosphorus Compounds)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Engel R, Cohen J I. Synthesis of carbon–phosphorus bonds. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kilah N L, Wild S B. Product Class 13: Trialkylphosphine Oxides, Sulfides, Selenides, Tellurides, and Imides. In: Mathey F, editor. Science of Synthesis. Vol. 42. Stuttgart, Deutschland: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2009. pp. 595–633. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Delacroix O, Gaumont A C. Curr Org Chem. 2005;9:1851–1882. doi: 10.2174/138527205774913079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Arbuzova S N, Gusarova N K, Trofimov B A. ARKIVOC. 2006;(v):12–36. doi: 10.3998/ark.5550190.0007.503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Honaker M T, Hovland J M, Salvatore R N. Curr Org Synth. 2007;4:31–45. doi: 10.2174/157017907779981561. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Beletskaya I P, Ananikov V P, Khemchyan L L. Synthesis of Phosphorus Compounds via Metal-Catalyzed Addition of P–H Bond to Unsaturated Organic Molecules. In: Peruzzini M, Gonsalvi L, editors. Phosphorus Compounds, Advanced Tools in Catalysis and Material Sciences. Vol. 37. Netherlands: Springer; 2011. pp. 213–264. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Koshti V, Gaikwad S, Chikkali S H. Coord Chem Rev. 2014;265:52–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Deprèle S, Montchamp J-L. J Org Chem. 2001;66:6745–6755. doi: 10.1021/jo015876i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leca D, Fensterbank L, Lacôte E, Malacria M. Chem Soc Rev. 2005;34:858–865. doi: 10.1039/B500511F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oparina L A, Gusarova N K, Vysotskaya O V, Artem’ev A V, Kolyvanov N A, Trofimov B A. Synthesis. 2014;46:653–659. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1340497. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dombek B D. J Org Chem. 1978;43:3408–3409. doi: 10.1021/jo00411a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Routaboul L, Toulgoat F, Gatignol J, Lohier J-F, Norah B, Delacroix O, Alayrac C, Taillefer M, Gaumont A-C. Chem – Eur J. 2013;19:8760–8764. doi: 10.1002/chem.201301417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bunlaksananusorn T, Knochel P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:5817–5819. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)01177-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fu X, Jiang Z, Tan C-H. Chem Commun. 2007:5058–5060. doi: 10.1039/B713151H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Perrier A, Comte V, Moïse C, Richard P, Le Gendre P. Eur J Org Chem. 2010:1562–1568. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200901407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu Q, Han L-B. J Organomet Chem. 2011;696:130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.08.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu Q, Zhou Y-B, Zhao C-Q, Yin S-F, Han L-B. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2013;13:824–835. doi: 10.2174/1389557511313060005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tanaka M. Top Organomet Chem. 2013;43:167–201. doi: 10.1007/3418_2011_20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stockland R A, Jr, Taylor R I, Thompson L E, Patel P B. Org Lett. 2005;7:851–853. doi: 10.1021/ol0474047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lenker H K, Richard M E, Reese K P, Carter A F, Zawisky J D, Winter E F, Bergeron T W, Guydon K S, Stockland R A., Jr J Org Chem. 2012;77:1378–1385. doi: 10.1021/jo202183u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kawaguchi S, Nomoto A, Sonoda M, Ogawa A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:624–626. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.11.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alonso F, Moglie Y, Radivoy G, Yus M. Green Chem. 2012;14:2699–2702. doi: 10.1039/C2GC35898K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Malysheva S F, Gusarova N K, Artem’ev A V, Belogorlova N A, Albanov A I, Borodina T N, Smirnov V I, Trofimov B A. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:2516–2521. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201301786. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Malysheva S F, Gusarova N K, Artem’ev A V, Belogorlova N A, Albanov A I, Borodina T N, Smirnov V I, Trofimov B A. Synthesis. 2014;46:2656–2662. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1378357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hirai T, Han L-B. Org Lett. 2007;9:53–55. doi: 10.1021/ol062505l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Skene W G, Belt S T, Connolly T J, Hahn P, Scaiano J C. Macromolecules. 1998;31:9103–9105. doi: 10.1021/ma9812229. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
General remarks, experimental procedure and characterization data; crystallographic information for 3d; 1H, 13C & 31P NMR spectra of synthesized compounds.
CIF file of compound 3d.



























