Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 6;160(5):919–928.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.002

The Association of Race with Childhood Uveitis

Sheila T Angeles-Han 1,3, Courtney McCracken 1, Steven Yeh 1,3, Kirsten Jenkins 2, Daneka Stryker 1, Curtis Travers 1, Kelly Rouster-Stevens 1,2, Larry B Vogler 1,2, Scott R Lambert 1,3, Carolyn Drews-Botsch 4, Sampath Prahalad 1,2
PMCID: PMC4661073  NIHMSID: NIHMS713869  PMID: 26255577

Abstract

Purpose

To identify risk factors for a severe uveitis course among children with non-infectious uveitis.

Design

Retrospective cohort study

Method

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Records of 94 children with uveitis were reviewed at enrollment and every 3-6 months (2011-2015). Severe uveitis was defined as a history of ocular complications or a visual acuity (VA) of ≤20/200. Children were compared by disease, VA, complications and race. Regression models were used to model risk factors for severe disease. When examining race, we focused on non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White children only.

Results

Of 85 children with uveitis and complete ocular examinations, 27 (32%) had a history of a VA of ≤20/200. A subanalysis of non-Hispanic African American and White children showed an increased prevalence of VA ≤20/200 in non-Hispanic African Americans (18/25 (72%) vs. 4/43 (9%)). Non-Hispanic African Americans were more likely to be diagnosed at an older age (p=0.030), have intermediate uveitis (p=0.026), bilateral disease (p=0.032), a history of VA ≤20/50 (p=0.002), VA ≤20/200 (p<0.001), and a higher rate of complications (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, non-Hispanic African American race was a significant predictor of blindness (OR=31.6, 95% CI (5.9– 168.5), p<0.001), after controlling for uveitis duration. Non-Hispanic African Americans also developed 2.2 times more unique complications per year of disease than non-Hispanic Whites when controlling for uveitis type and duration.

Conclusions

There appear to be racial differences in the outcomes of children with uveitis. Non-Hispanic African American children with non-juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis may have worse visual outcomes with increased vision loss and ocular complications. These findings highlight the need for future studies in minority populations.


Pediatric non-infectious uveitis can lead to severe ocular complications and permanent vision loss1. Uveitis can occur as a primary disease without systemic associations (idiopathic uveitis) but can also be related to other diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), sarcoidosis, and Behcet’s disease.

In North America, pediatric uveitis is most commonly associated with JIA, affecting 10-20% of children with inflammatory arthritis2. Three to 66% develop vision loss and ocular complications related to risk factors such as male gender, short duration between arthritis and uveitis diagnoses, a uveitis diagnosis prior to arthritis diagnosis, young age at uveitis onset, and a poor initial ocular examination (i.e. anterior chamber cell score ≥1+, initial visual acuity (VA) of 20/200 or worse, or presence of complications)3-14. However, few studies have examined risk factors in a prospective cohort of children. Early identification and treatment of those at greatest risk for severe disease may prevent devastating ocular sequelae.

Race plays a significant role in various autoimmune conditions such as JIA, systemic lupus erythematosus and sarcoidosis. In JIA, children of European descent predominantly develop oligoarticular disease, whereas non-European children develop polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) positive JIA with worse arthritis outcomes15-17. Since JIA subtypes differ in their association with uveitis, and race predisposes one to different JIA categories, race may influence uveitis risk. Less extensive investigation has been conducted in racial association with pediatric uveitis.

The primary objective of this study is to identify risk factors for a severe disease course among children with non-infectious uveitis, defined as a history of ocular complications or a VA of 20/200 or worse.

Patients and Methods

Data were collected retrospectively and prospectively. Some children in our cohort were enrolled after their initial uveitis diagnosis, requiring retrospective data collection. However, after enrollment, all data were collected prospectively, including that of children who were enrolled close to their time of uveitis diagnosis. Patients were managed in the Division of Pediatric Rheumatology of the Emory Children’s Center. This study, including medical chart data collection from pediatric rheumatologists and ophthalmologists, was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Emory University and conformed to the requirements of the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Informed consent was obtained from the parent/legal guardian, and assent was obtained from the children if applicable. Research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Subjects

Eligible children presenting with a diagnosis of non-infectious uveitis at less than 18 years of age were enrolled from the pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinics at Emory Children’s Center from November 2011 to January 2015. They were followed prospectively from time of enrollment and returned for their usual follow up appointments every 3-6 months. Inclusion criteria included: 1) a diagnosis of non-infectious uveitis and 2) English speaking. Exclusion criteria included: 1) refusal to participate.

Data Collection

We reviewed rheumatology and ophthalmology medical records from time of diagnosis to time of presentation to our clinics and then every 3-6 months during the usual pediatric rheumatology follow up visit until March 1, 2015. Data collected at the baseline visit included date of birth, gender, self-described race and ethnicity, JIA category established by the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification in children with arthritis 18, uveitis characteristics (onset date, diagnosis date, laterality, location, ocular complications such as cataracts, glaucoma, synechiae, band keratopathy, ocular hypertension, cystoid macular edema, amblyopia and other complications, and ophthalmic surgeries), ocular exams (best corrected visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure, and anterior chamber cell score), labs (antinuclear antibody (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), HLA-B27, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)), and both past and current medications. Race was designated as American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White by self-report. Ethnicity was also self-reported as Hispanic or non-Hispanic. Since children without a diagnosis of JIA do not commonly undergo regular screening examinations, an accurate determination of disease duration is challenging. In this study, disease duration refers to time from uveitis diagnosis to analysis. Follow up data on arthritis, uveitis, labs and medications were collected at 3-6 month intervals (time of last study visit to current study visit) and during uveitis flares. Data from the ocular exam were recorded from every ophthalmology visit with varied intervals depending on disease activity. Not all patients had complete data from their initial ocular exam or subsequent visits as some patients had chronic uveitis prior to enrollment and records were unavailable.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.3 for Windows (Cary, NC). Statistical significance was assessed at the 0.05 level unless otherwise noted. Data are summarized using means and standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges (25th – 75th percentile) or counts and percentages, when appropriate. Duration of uveitis was calculated as time between dates uveitis of diagnosis to last study visit. For statistical purposes, we converted Snellen VA to logMAR VA. We compared children 1) with JIA-associated uveitis to those with other forms of uveitis, 2) with a history of a VA of 20/200 or worse to those with a VA better than of 20/200, 3) with and without a history of ocular complications, and 4) of non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White race, using Chi-square tests and two sample t-tests. In instances of small expected cell counts (<5), exact Chi-square tests were used. When continuous data were skewed or non-normal, a nonparametric test (Mann Whitney-U or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) was used in place of the two sample t-test.

Multivariable logistic regression was used to simultaneously model multiple risk factors for development of complicated disease (i.e., blindness or complications). Candidate predictors identified in the univariate analyses (p < 0.1) were entered into the model using backwards elimination. Variables were systematically removed until all variables in the model were significant at the 0.05 level or until a significant reduction in model fit was observed. In addition, other variables that were demonstrated to be associated with the risk of poor outcome and race (e.g., duration of disease defined as time from disease diagnosis to analysis) were included in the models. In addition, to compare the number of ocular complications among non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White children, multivariable negative binomial models were used to model the number of unique complications developed while adjusting for disease duration. To further examine the role of non-Hispanic African American race with poor visual outcomes in a more homogenous cohort of children with uveitis, a subanalysis was performed in non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic African American children with only JIA-associated uveitis or chronic anterior uveitis.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics of cohort

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 94 children with uveitis are presented in Table 1. Of these, 52 (55%) also had JIA, 30 (32%) had idiopathic uveitis, 6 (6%) were HLA-B27 positive, 2 (2%) had sarcoidosis, and 4 (4%) had other types of uveitis associated with vitritis, nodular scleritis, pars planitis, and sympathethic ophthalmia. There were 57 (61%) White and 28 (30%) African American children. Eleven (12%) of the children were Hispanic. The median (25th - 75th) age at uveitis diagnosis was 6.3 years (4.0 – 10.6). Many had anterior uveitis (N = 65 (74%)) with bilateral involvement (62 (70%)). Most common ocular complications included synechiae (41 (44%)) and cataracts (38 (40%)).

Table 1. Comparison of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-associated Uveitis (JIA-U) and Other Types of Childhood Uveitis.

Characteristics
N = 94 unless otherwise specified
N (%) unless otherwise specified
Overall
N=94
JIA-
associated
uveitis
N=52
(55.3%)
Other
types of
uveitis
N=42
(44.7%)
p-value
Demographics
 Age at most recent visit,
Median (25th – 75th)
11.8
(8.5 – 14.9)
13.3
(8.4 – 14.6)
13.3
(9.2 – 15.0)
0.225
 Gender, female 66 (70.2%) 40 (76.9%) 26 (61.9%) 0.173
 Race
  White 57 (60.6%) 38 (73.1%) 19 (45.2%) 0.003b
  African American 28 (29.8%) 8 (15.4%) 20 (47.6%)
  Other 9 (9.6%) 6 (11.5%) 3 (7.1%)
 Hispanic 13 (13.8%) 10 (19.2%) 3 (7.1%) 0.184
 Insurance
  Private 54 (57.5%) 31 (59.6%) 23 (54.8%) 0.863
  Medicaid 37 (39.4%) 19 (36.5%) 18 (42.9%)
  None 3 (3.2%) 2 (3.9%) 1 (2.4%)
Disease Characteristics
 Age at uveitis diagnosis
 (years),
  Median (25th – 75th)
6.3
(4.0 – 10.6)
4.8
(3.5 – 10.4)
8.7
(5.3 – 10.7)
0.006 b
 Location of Disease a (N = 88)
  Anterior 65 (73.9%) 38 (80.9%) 27 (65.9%) 0.110
  Intermediate 5 (5.7%) 0 (0.0%) 5 (12.2%) 0.014 b
  Posterior/Panuveitis 4 (4.6%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (9.8%) 0.029 b
  Unknown 14 (15.9%) 9 (18.0%) 5 (12.2%) 0.373
 Bilateral Disease a (N = 89) 62 (69.7%) 34 (72.3%) 28 (66.7%) 0.562
 Worst Ocular Exam a (N=85)
  Slit lamp exam (cells),
   0 & 0.5+ 19 (22.4%) 11 (23.9%) 8 (20.5%) 0.797
   1+ and worse 66 (77.6%) 35 (76.1%) 31 (79.5%)
  Intraocular Pressure
  Median (25th – 75th)
20.0
(17.0 –
26.0)
19.0
(17.0 –
25.0)
21.0
(17.0 –
28.0)
0.282
  Visual acuity 20/50 or
  worse
49 (57.7%) 21 (44.7%) 28 (73.7%) 0.009 b
  Visual acuity 20/200 or
  worse
27 (31.8%) 9 (19.2%) 18 (47.4%) 0.009 b
Type of Complications
 Cataracts 38 (40.4%) 16 (30.8%) 22 (52.4%) 0.038 b
 Glaucoma/ocular hypertension 16 (17.0%) 9 (17.3%) 7 (16.7%) 1.000
 Synechiae 41 (43.6%) 16 (30.8%) 25 (59.5%) 0.007 b
 Band Keratopathy 28 (29.8%) 13 (25.0%) 15 (35.7%) 0.364
 Cystoid Macular Edema 22 (23.4%) 8 (15.4%) 14 (33.3%) 0.052
Initial Ocular Exam a
 ≥1+ cells at first exam, (N=46) 29 (63.0%) 16 (61.5%) 13 (65.0%) 1.000
 Intraocular pressure > 21,
 (N=25)
2 (8.0%) 1 (7.7%) 1 (8.3%) 1.000
 LogMAR Visual acuity, (N=42)
Median (25th – 75th)
0.18
(0.00 –
0.40)
0.18
(0.00 –
0.30)
0.18
(0.10 –
0.48)
0.622
Labs a
 ANAc positive (N=92) 37 (40.2%) 28 (54.9%) 9 (22.0%) 0.003 b
 Earliest ESRd (N=89)
Median (25th – 75th)
11.0
(6.0 – 29.0)
22.0
(8.0 – 38.0)
9.0
(3.0 – 14.0)
<0.001b
 HLAe-B27 positive (N=62) 16 (25.8%) 6 (18.8%) 10 (33.3%) 0.250
Medication Use a (N = 93)
 Methotrexate Oral 57 (61.3%) 36 (70.6%) 21 (50.0%) 0.055
 Methotrexate Subcutaneous 65 (69.9%) 38 (74.5%) 27 (64.3%) 0.365
 Infliximab 27 (29.0%) 17 (33.3%) 10 (23.8%) 0.364
 Adalimumab 17 (18.3%) 12 (23.5%) 5 (11.9%) 0.184
a

Indicates missing data;

b

p = <0.05; Chi-square tests, two sample t-tests, non-parametric test (Mann Whitney-U or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test).

c

ANA = Antinuclear antibody.

d

ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

e

HLA = Human Leukocyte Antigen.

A majority of children (77 (83%)) were treated with subcutaneous and/or oral methotrexate during the course of their disease. Sixteen children did not require or refused immunosuppressive therapy and among those, 6 (37%) used steroid ocular drops alone, 1 (6%) NSAIDs alone, 1(6%) oral prednisone alone, and 8 (50%) a combination of NSAIDS and ocular drops. Approximately 36 (38%) required biologic therapy, but not beyond anti-tumor necrosis factor agents for treatment of uveitis.

Given the increased frequency of children with JIA-associated uveitis, we compared them to children with other uveitis types (Table 1). Children with JIA-associated uveitis were primarily White (38 (73%)), whereas almost half of those with other types of uveitis were African American (20 (48%)) (p = 0.003). Those with other types of uveitis were older at diagnosis (p=0.006), had intermediate (p = 0.014) and posterior location (p = 0.029), were more likely to have a history of a VA of 20/50 or worse (p = 0.009) or 20/200 or worse (p = 0.009), and several ocular complications.

Children with ocular complications and legal blindness

Overall, 49 children (58%) had a history of a VA of 20/50 or worse, and 27 (32%) had a history of a VA of 20/200 or worse. Among the 27 children with VA of 20/200 or worse, 9 (33.3%) had bilateral blindness. At last follow-up (median duration of follow-up: 4.3 years), 14 (52%) had improved visual acuity (VA better than 20/200), while 13 (48%) were still considered blind in one or both of their eyes. Of those with improved visual acuity (n = 14), 10 (71%) still have significant vision loss (VA of 20/50 or worse) while the remaining 4 (29%) have a VA of 20/40 or better. In addition, 62 (66%) of children had at least one ocular complication. These poor outcomes were significantly more common in children with non-JIA associated uveitis (Table 2). Those with a history of a VA of 20/200 or worse had worse logMAR VA on initial examination (p < 0.001), similar to children with ocular complications, but this did not reach significance (median logMAR VA 0.18 vs. 0.09, p = 0.057) (data not shown).

Table 2. Comparison of a History of a Visual Acuity of 20/200 or Worse in Childhood Uveitis.

Characteristics
N = 85 unless otherwise specified
N (%) unless otherwise specified
VA of 20/200 or worse p-value
Yes
N=27 (31.8%)
No
N=58 (68.2%)
Demographics
 Age at most recent visit,
Median (25th – 75th)
11.9
(9.1 – 15.7)
11.4
(8.3 – 14.8)
0.329
 Gender, female 18 (66.7%) 44 (75.9%) 0.435
 Race
  Caucasian 5 (18.5%) 46 (79.3%) <0.001b
  African American 19 (70.4%) 7 (12.1%)
  Other 3 (11.1%) 5 (8.6%)
 Hispanic 2 (7.4%) 8 (13.8%) 0.074
 Insurance
  Private 13 (48.2%) 36 (62.1%) 0.466
  Medicaid 13 (48.2%) 21 (36.2%)
  None 1 (3.7%) 1 (1.7%)
Disease Characteristics
 Type of uveitis
  JIA-associated uveitis 9 (33.3%) 38 (65.5%) 0.009
 Age at uveitis diagnosis (years),
Median (25th – 75th)
6.6
(4.8 – 9.0)
6.0
(3.5 – 11.8)
0.728
 Location of Disease a (N = 82)
  Anterior 17 (65.4%) 44 (78.6%) 0.204
  Intermediate 2 (7.7%) 3 (5.4%) 0.682
  Posterior/Panuveitis 3 (11.5%) 1 (1.8%) 0.056
  Unknown 4 (15.4%) 8 (14.3%) 0.897
 Bilateral Disease a (N = 80) 21 (77.8%) 37 (69.8%) 0.453
Type of Complications
 Cataracts 21 (77.8%) 15 (25.9%) <0.001b
 Glaucoma/ocular hypertension 10 (37.0%) 4 (6.9%) 0.001b
 Synechiae 19 (70.4%) 19 (32.8%) 0.002b
 Band keratopathy 17 (63.0%) 10 (17.2%) <0.001b
 Cystoid macular edema 14 (51.9%) 8 (13.8%) <0.001b
Initial Ocular Exam a
 ≥1+ cells at first exam (N=45) 6 (60.0%) 22 (62.9%) 1.000
 LogMAR Visual acuity (N=42)
Median (25th – 75th)
0.40
(0.18 – 1.00)
0.18
(0.00 – 0.30)
<0.001b
Labs a
 ANAc positive (N=84) 12 (46.2%) 22 (37.9%) 0.631
 Earliest ESRd (N=80)
Median (25th – 75th)
7.0
(2.0 – 16.0)
17.0
(7.0 – 36.0)
0.002b
 HLAf-B27 positive (N=56) 4 (22.2%) 10 (26.3%) 1.000
Medication Use a (N = 84)
 Methotrexate Oral 14 (51.9%) 38 (66.7%) 0.232
 Methotrexate Subcutaneous 21 (77.8%) 42 (73.7%) 0.791
 Infliximab 13 (48.2%) 14 (24.6%) 0.045b
 Adalimumab 4 (14.8%) 13 (22.8%) 0.563
a

Indicates missing data;

b

p = <0.05; Chi-square tests, two sample t-tests, non-parametric test (Mann Whitney-U or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test).

c

ANA = Antinuclear antibody.

d

ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

e

HLA = Human Leukocyte Antigen.

Children with uveitis compared by race

Since more African American children with uveitis appeared to experience poor visual outcomes, we explored uveitis characteristics by race and compared White and African American children and excluded those of Hispanic ethnicity (N = 76) (Table 3). Non-Hispanic African Americans were more likely older at uveitis diagnosis (p = 0.030), had intermediate uveitis (p = 0.026), bilateral involvement (p = 0.032), and ocular complications such as cystoid macular edema (p = 0.004). Although they were also more likely to have Medicaid insurance coverage (p = 0.002), there were no significant differences in treatment with methotrexate or biologics.

Table 3. Comparison of Non-Hispanic African American and White Race in Childhood Uveitis.

Characteristics
N = 76 unless otherwise specified
N (%) unless otherwise specified
Race p-value
African
American
N=27
(35.3%)
White
N=49 (64.5%)
Demographics
 Age at most recent visit,
Median (25th – 75th)
13.6
(9.9 – 16.5)
10.3
(8.9 – 14.8)
0.084
 Gender, female 15 (55.6%) 36 (73.5%) 0.132
 Insurance
  Private 8 (29.6%) 34 (69.4%) 0.002b
  Medicaid 18 (66.7%) 13 (26.5%)
  None 1 (3.7%) 2 (4.1%)
Uveitis Disease Characteristics
 Type of uveitis
  JIA-associated uveitis 8 (29.6%) 32 (65.3%) 0.003b
 Age at uveitis diagnosis (years),
Median (25th – 75th)
9.2
(5.5 – 11.3)
5.3
(3.7 – 10.5)
0.030b
 Uveitis duration at most recent visit
(years), Median (25th – 75th)
3.8
(2.8 – 4.6)
3.4
(1.3 – 6.1)
0.718
 Location of Disease a (N = 70)
  Anterior 16 (66.7%) 35 (76.1%) 0.400
  Intermediate 4 (16.7%) 1 (2.2%) 0.026b
  Posterior/Panuveitis 2 (8.3%) 1 (2.2%) 0.226
  Unknown 2 (8.3%) 9 (19.6%) 0.219
 Bilateral Disease a (N = 71) 23 (85.2%) 27 (61.4%) 0.032b
 Worst Ocular Exam a, (N = 68)
  Slit lamp examination (cells),
   0 & 0.5+ 5 (20.8%) 12 (27.3%) 0.770
   1+ and worse 19 (79.2%) 32 (72.7%)
  Intraocular Pressure
  Median (25th – 75th)
22.5
(17.5 –
34.5)
19.0
(18.0 – 24.0)
0.086
  Visual Acuity 20/50 or worse 20 (80.0%) 22 (51.2%) 0.002b
  Visual Acuity 20/200 or worse 18 (72.0%) 4 (9.3%) <0.001b
Type of Complications
 Cataracts 18 (66.7%) 15 (30.6%) 0.004b
 Glaucoma/ocular hypertension 8 (29.6%) 6 (12.2%) 0.073
 Synechiae 16 (59.3%) 17 (34.7%) 0.054
 Band keratopathy 16 (59.3%) 9 (18.4%) <0.001b
 Cystoid macular edema 13 (48.2%) 8 (16.3%) 0.004b
Initial Ocular Exam a, (N = 37)
 ≥1+ cells at first exam 5 (50.0%) 17 (63.0%) 0.708
 Intraocular pressure > 21 2 (28.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0.123
 LogMAR Visual acuity
Median (25th – 75th)
0.40
(0.18 –
0.70)
0.14
(0.00 – 0.18)
0.014b
Labs a
 ANAc positive N=76 11 (40.7%) 19 (38.8%) 1.000
 Earliest ESRd, N=71
Median (25th – 75th)
9.0
(2.0 – 18.0)
14.0
(7.0 – 34.0)
0.076
 HLAe-B27 positive, N=51 1 (5.3%) 12 (37.5%) 0.018b
Medication Use a (N = 75)
 Methotrexate Oral 13 (48.2%) 32 (66.7%) 0.144
 Methotrexate Subcutaneous 21 (77.8%) 31 (64.6%) 0.301
 Infliximab 10 (37.0%) 13 (22.8%) 0.258
 Adalimumab 4 (15.4%) 12 (25.0%) 0.300
a

Indicates missing data;

b

p = <0.05; Chi-square tests, two sample t-tests, non-parametric test (Mann Whitney-U or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test)

c

ANA = Antinuclear antibody.

d

ESR = Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

e

HLA = Human Leukocyte Antigen.

More non-Hispanic African Americans also had a history of VA of 20/50 or worse (p = 0.002) and 20/200 or worse (p < 0.001). However, non-JIA associated uveitis was more prevalent in non-Hispanic African American children relative to non-Hispanic White children (p = 0.004). When examining children with non-JIA associated uveitis only, the same trend was observed, as non-Hispanic African Americans still had an increased frequency of a VA of 20/200 or worse (13/18 (72.2%) vs. 1/14 (7.1%); p < 0.001) (data not shown). Among the 4 non-Hispanic White and 18 non-Hispanic African American children with VA of 20/200 or worse, 8 (36.4%) had bilateral blindness; all of whom were non-Hispanic African American. Eleven children (50%) have improved visual acuity (VA better than 20/200) but half remain blind as of last follow-up. Among the 4 non-Hispanic White children, 1 (25%) is currently blind, 2 (50%) have improved VA, but still have vision loss, and 1 has VA of 20/40 or better. In the 18 non-Hispanic African American children with blindness, 10 (55.6%) are still blind at last follow-up, 6 (33.3%) have improved VA with vision loss, and 2 (11.1%) have VA of 20/40 or better.

Predictors of severe uveitis

We examined the potential role of race on ocular complications and/or blindness while controlling for disease and uveitis duration (Table 4). We adjusted for disease duration since ocular complications and vision loss could develop over the course of disease. We again limited our analysis to non-Hispanic children. On univariate analysis, a diagnosis of other types of uveitis, as compared to JIA-associated uveitis, (p < 0.001), longer duration of disease (p= 0.026), and non-Hispanic African American race (p = 0.012) were associated with ocular complications. On multivariable analysis, after adjustment for uveitis duration, uveitis not attributed to JIA (OR = 10.8; 95% CI [2.6 – 43.5]) was still a significant predictor of a history of complications; while the association with non-Hispanic African American race failed to reach significance (OR = 3.4; 95% CI [0.8 – 15.5]), but remained clinically significant. However, univariate analysis suggested that non-Hispanic African American children had, on average, more types of complications than non-Hispanic Whites (median number of complications: 3 vs 1, p < 0.001). To explore differences in the number of ocular complications of non-Hispanic African American and White children, we utilized a negative binomial model including race and uveitis disease type and included an offset parameter adjusting for varying durations of disease. We noted an increased rate in the development of unique complications in non-Hispanic African American children (rate ratio = 2.2; 95% CI [1.4-3.5]), and in children with a diagnosis of non-JIA associated uveitis (rate ratio = 1.9; [95% CI 1.2-3.1]). We noticed that non-Hispanic African American children who developed uveitis (rate ratio = 2.2; 95% CI [1.4-3.5]), and those whose uveitis was not attributable to JIA (rate ratio = 1.9; 95% CI [1.2-3.1]), developed complications at an accelerated rate relative to other children. After adjustment for duration of disease and disease type, non-Hispanic African Americans remained more likely to have cataracts (p = 0.009), band keratopathy(p < 0.001), and cystoid macular edema (p = 0.015).

Table 4. Risk factors for Ocular Complications or a Visual Acuity of 20/200 or Worse in Childhood Uveitis.

Multivariable
Models
Outcome Risk Factors Risk (95% CI)1 p-value
1 a Visual acuity
20/200 or
worse
Non-Hispanic
African
American
31.64 (5.94 – 168.49) <0.001c
Non-JIA
uveitis
1.32 (0.27 – 6.41) 0.731
Uveitis
duration
1.26 (1.00 – 1.59) 0.053

2 a Any history of
complication
Non-Hispanic
African
American
3.41 (0.75 – 15.49) 0.113
Non-JIA
uveitis
10.75 (2.62 – 43.48) 0.001c
Uveitis
duration
1.44 (1.14 – 1.82) 0.003c

3 b Number of
Complications
Non-Hispanic
African
American
2.21 (1.40, 3.49) <0.001c
Non-JIA
uveitis
1.94 (1.22, 3.11) 0.005c
a

For models 1 and 2, risk is presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

b

For model 3, risk is presented as a rate ratio, expressed as number of distinct complications / duration of disease in non-Hispanic African Americans compared to Caucasians or non-JIA uveitis compared to JIA-associated uveitis.

c

p = <0.05.

Similarly, in univariate analysis, non-Hispanic African American race (p<0.001), other types of uveitis (p = 0.009), earliest ESR (p =0.002, and VA on initial ocular exam (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of blindness. Due to the small number of patients with data from their initial ocular exam, logMAR VA was not included in multivariable models. In addition, because ESR was highly associated with type of uveitis (rs = 0.40; p < 0.001), it was also excluded. In multivariable analysis, after controlling for duration of disease, only non-Hispanic African American race remained a significant predictor of blindness (OR = 31.6; 95% CI [5.9 – 150.0]).

Sub-analysis of children with JIA-associated uveitis and chronic anterior uveitis

We recognize that the categories and patterns of uveitis can differ based on their association with different types of systemic inflammatory diseases. Hence, we conducted a sub-analysis of children with JIA-associated uveitis and chronic anterior uveitis alone, and we them compared by non-Hispanic African American and White race. Non-Hispanic African American children were still older at diagnosis (p = 0.012), their uveitis was less likely to be secondary to JIA (p = 0.019), had an increased history of a visual acuity of 20/200 or worse (p = 0.003), and more cataracts (p = 0.018), synechiae (p = 0.030), and band keratopathy (p = 0.005). They had a similar initial ocular exam and treatment with DMARDs and biologics. Although the odds decreased, non-Hispanic African American children still had an increased odds of a history of blindness (OR = 10.58; 95% CI [1.76 – 63.75]) with an increased rate of complications compared to non-Hispanic White children (rate ratio = 2.39; 95% CI [1.13 – 5.07]).

Discussion

We report that non-Hispanic African American race and uveitis that is not associated with JIA are potential predictors of a severe disease course in pediatric non-infectious uveitis. Non-Hispanic African American children had worse visual outcomes with an accelerated rate of ocular complications, and an increased likelihood of vision loss. Race may have an effect on a child’s uveitis course, even accounting for the fact that non-Hispanic African-American children with uveitis are more likely to have ocular disease that is not attributable to JIA. This difference in outcome was also evident when considering a homogenous group of patients with JIA-associated uveitis and anterior chronic uveitis only.

Risk factors for the development of uveitis in children with JIA are well established and incorporated in the American Academy of Pediatrics screening schedule 19. However, there are few reports on markers of severe pediatric uveitis. In general, predictors of vision loss include male gender, intermediate uveitis, severe disease at baseline examination, and history of prior surgery before presentation3,11,20-23. Similarly, predictors for ocular complications include young age at diagnosis, increased cells and flare, increased disease duration before treatment, presence of keratic precipitates, and intermediate uveitis 11,23. For JIA-associated uveitis specifically, additional risk factors for complications include short duration between diagnosis of arthritis and uveitis and a positive ANA23,24. We did not find a difference in visual outcomes based on gender and ANA status, but our other findings remain consistent with these studies.

Approximately 1/3 of our uveitis cohort had a history of a VA of 20/200 or worse (legal blindness). This was more common in children with other types of uveitis (8/38 (47%)), compared to JIA-associated uveitis (9/47 (19%)). This finding is similar to another cohort wherein 24% of 75 JIA-associated uveitis children presented with blindness24. Importantly, we found that non-Hispanic African American children with uveitis were much more likely to experience legal blindness- 70% were non-Hispanic African American despite only 30% of the entire cohort being non-Hispanic African American. Likewise, all children with a history of bilateral blindness were non-Hispanic African American, and approximately half had one blind eye at last follow up. Even after including only children with JIA-associated uveitis and chronic anterior uveitis, non-Hispanic African American children still had more reports of legal blindness (62% vs. 13%).

Children with non-JIA-associated uveitis had a higher rate of complications after adjusting for duration of disease, similar to another report of children with idiopathic uveitis who experienced more severe inflammation11. Even after focusing on children with JIA-associated uveitis and chronic anterior uveitis only, they still developed more types of complications per year of duration of disease. After adjusting for disease duration and disease type, non-Hispanic African American race was no longer a statistically significant predictor of history of complications although a clinically significant increased risk of complications was present. Despite our larger cohort of African American children compared to other studies, we are not adequately powered to detect this association.

Race plays a significant role in various autoimmune conditions, including JIA and systemic lupus erythematosus, but there have been few studies describing uveitis in African American children. An incidence and prevalence study from the Pacific Ocular Inflammation Study noted that of 224 adult uveitis cases, only 2% were Black25. However, Black patients with uveitis had the highest incidence at 39.6 cases per 100,000 patient years. Nguyen et al. reported an increased uveitis prevalence in African American adults with inflammatory bowel disease compared to Whites (8.1% vs. 1.6%, OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3-13.0, p < 0.001)26. A 2 year prospective study of Bantu-speaking Black patients in South Africa noted that of 355 new uveitis cases, there were 40 children with anterior uveitis and one with posterior uveitis, with a rate of 11 per 100,000 population per year 27. Uveitis has been described in 6-8% of African children with JIA with varied ANA positivity, although sample sizes ranged from 2-1315,28-32. The incidence of uveitis was similar in children of European and non-European ancestry (14.4% vs. 12.8%) in a Toronto JIA cohort. However, risk was increased in European children and decreased in non-European ancestries when compared to the general Toronto population15. We previously reported on data from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) registry, a large multicenter registry of children and adolescents with pediatric rheumatic disease based in North America, and showed that in 3967 children with JIA, only 13 of 220 (5.6%) non-Hispanic African American children compared to 446 of 3747 (12%) non-Hispanic White (NHW) children developed uveitis30. Hence, reports of uveitis prevalence in African American children has varied.

There is less extensive data on racial differences in the course of pediatric uveitis. African American adults have been reported to have increased hypotony and a 2-fold increase of incident glaucoma in those randomized to implants or systemic therapy33,34. A severe course has been described in 22 African children with various types of uveitis (idiopathic, Still’s disease, and sympathetic ophthalmia) 35. However, Woreta et al. found no associations between race and ocular complications, a VA or 20/50 or worse, or a VA of 20/200 or worse in their JIA cohort, although there were only 5 blacks and 64 white patients23. We recently demonstrated increased blindness in a small cohort of non-Hispanic African American children with JIA-associated uveitis ((5/7) 71% vs. (2/29) 7%)36. Thus, reports vary on the course of disease in children of African descent.

The increased disease severity noted in our non-Hispanic African American children could be secondary to biologic differences or variance in health-care access. Although our non-Hispanic African American patients increasingly utilized Medicaid insurance health care, the duration of follow up and treatment were comparable. There are several potential reasons why non-Hispanic African American children were older at diagnosis, had a worse initial ocular examination and more complications. This could be secondary to a delay in referral and diagnosis or due to underlying genetic differences in relation to prevalence and outcome. Several studies have shown racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access and outcomes in children37,38. Most studies in non-Hispanic White children with JIA-associated uveitis show associations with the HLA-DRB1 allele, and one study highlighted the association of HLA-DR8, but not HLA-DR5, with chronic non-granulomatous anterior uveitis in African Americans 39. It is crucial to understand the reasons for the differences in outcomes in regards to race so we can better address deficiencies in treatment or access.

We report a higher proportion of non-Hispanic African American patients than previous studies, due to our location in the Southeastern United States. However, a 1997 report of uveitis prevalence in the Southeastern US was similar to our cohort and thus is representative of the region 40. Of 385 patients, 31% were African American and 67% were White. Additionally, as in our sample, most of the African American patients had idiopathic uveitis. The larger proportion of non-Hispanic African American children in our population allows us to examine questions regarding differences in outcomes associated with race. We also focused on a non-Hispanic population since outcomes may vary based on ethnicity. We are exploring outcomes in this cohort.

There is a potential referral bias since patients with mild disease responsive to topical therapy may not be referred. Likewise, our institution is a tertiary care medical center which may bias towards referral of only severe cases needing immunosuppression. However, we are the largest pediatric rheumatology group in Georgia, and our group sees many children for their initial uveitis workup regardless of the need for immunosuppressive therapy.

Accurate determination of the duration of uveitis is difficult. Many children are asymptomatic at onset, and routine eye examinations may not be performed, even in children with JIA. Hence, we used the time of diagnosis of uveitis in our analysis but recognize that uveitis may have been active beforehand.

Since many patients are referred from various centers throughout Georgia and surrounding Southeastern states, we do not always have their complete ophthalmology records. Hence, we were unable to confirm the significance of the initial ocular examination in our cohort. There was not a protocol that stated specific complications to identify, hence some complications may have been missed. Timing of the onset of complications was not known in all children, and we were unable to perform survival analysis. However, we anticipate that this will be possible in the future as our cohort increases.

To address these issues, our group is designing future studies to examine racial differences in response to therapy, timing of referral or seeking care, and the genetics of uveitis. We also plan to have standardized protocols for identifying complications.

Given our limited sample size and single center experience, we were unable to adjust our significance level to control for testing of multiple hypotheses. A larger cohort of children or an external validation sample would be needed to confirm our findings.

In conclusion, we newly demonstrate that there are racial differences in the visual outcomes of children with uveitis. Our findings highlight the potential role of race and its implications on treatment of disease and complications. We may need to treat non-Hispanic African American children with uveitis earlier and more aggressively with systemic therapy. The impact of race should be further explored in a large, racially diverse cohort since identifying high risk children will enable early optimal treatment and potentially prevent vision threatening complications associated with severe disease. To our knowledge, this is the largest report on a childhood uveitis course in non-Hispanic African American children.

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the National Eye Institute K23-EY021760/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr. Angeles-Han). Dr. Prahalad is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases R01-AR060893/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, The Marcus Foundation Inc. (Atlanta, Georgia), and the Arthritis Foundation (Atlanta, Georgia) but these had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

The authors wish to thank Erica Myoung (Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia) for medical record review and data entry, and the Emory+Children’s Pediatric Research Center Biostatistics Core (Atlanta, Georgia).

Biography

graphic file with name nihms-713869-b0001.gif

Sheila T. Angeles-Han, MD, MSc is an Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Ophthalmology at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia. She completed her pediatrics residency at the University of Illinois at Chicago, her pediatric rheumatology fellowship at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, and her Masters of Science in Clinical Investigation at Cornell University. Dr. Han’s clinical and research career is dedicated to improving the outcomes of children with uveitis by identifying risk markers for disease development and severe course. She also developed the first measure of vision related function and quality of life in pediatric uveitis, “Effects of Youngsters’ Eyesight on Quality of Life” (EYE-Q).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosures

No financial disclosures.

References

  • 1.Reiff A, Kadayifcilar S, Ozen S. Rheumatic inflammatory eye diseases of childhood. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013;39(4):801–832. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2007;369(9563):767–778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60363-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edelsten C, Lee V, Bentley CR, Kanski JJ, Graham EM. An evaluation of baseline risk factors predicting severity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis and other chronic anterior uveitis in early childhood. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(1):51–56. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saurenmann RK, Levin AV, Feldman BM, Rose JB, Laxer RM, Schneider R, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcome of uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a long-term followup study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(2):647–657. doi: 10.1002/art.22381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Paroli MP, Speranza S, Marino M, Pirraglia MP, Pivetti-Pezzi P. Prognosis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13(7):616–621. doi: 10.1177/112067210301300704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dana MR, Merayo-Lloves J, Schaumberg DA, Foster CS. Visual outcomes prognosticators in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(2):236–244. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30329-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cassidy JT, Sullivan DB, Petty RE. Clinical patterns of chronic iridocyclitis in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1977;20(2 Suppl):224–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chalom EC, Goldsmith DP, Koehler MA, Bittar B, Rose CD, Ostrov BE, et al. Prevalence and outcome of uveitis in a regional cohort of patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(10):2031–2034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kotaniemi K, Kautiainen H, Karma A, Aho K. Occurrence of uveitis in recently diagnosed juvenile chronic arthritis: a prospective study. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):2071–2075. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00773-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kanski JJ. Juvenile arthritis and uveitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34(4):253–267. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(90)90026-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holland GN, Denove CS, Yu F. Chronic anterior uveitis in children: clinical characteristics and complications. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(4):667–678. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Saurenmann RK, Levin AV, Feldman BM, Laxer RM, Schneider R, Silverman ED. Risk factors for development of uveitis differ between girls and boys with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(6):1824–1828. doi: 10.1002/art.27416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ayuso VK, Ten Cate HA, van der Does P, Rothova A, de Boer JH. Male gender and poor visual outcome in uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(6):987–993. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Angeles-Han STYS, Vogler LB. Updates on the risk markers and outcomes of severe juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2013;8(1):109–121. doi: 10.2217/ijr.12.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saurenmann RK, Rose JB, Tyrrell P, Feldman BM, Laxer RM, Schneider R, et al. Epidemiology of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a multiethnic cohort: ethnicity as a risk factor. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(6):1974–1984. doi: 10.1002/art.22709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pelajo CF, Angeles-Han ST, Prahalad S, Sgarlat CM, Davis TE, Miller LC, et al. Evaluation of the association between Hispanic ethnicity and disease activity and severity in a large cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(10):2549–2554. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2773-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ringold S, Beukelman T, Nigrovic PA, Kimura Y, Investigators CRSP Race, ethnicity, and disease outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a cross-sectional analysis of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(6):936–942. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petty RE. Growing pains: the ILAR classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(5):927–928. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cassidy J, Kivlin J, Lindsley C, Nocton J. Ophthalmologic examinations in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):1843–1845. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wolf MD, Lichter PR, Ragsdale CG. Prognostic factors in the uveitis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(10):1242–1248. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(87)80007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zulian F, Martini G, Falcini F, Gerloni V, Zannin ME, Pinello L, et al. Early predictors of severe course of uveitis in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(11):2446–2453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ozdal PC, Vianna RN, Deschenes J. Visual outcome of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis-associated uveitis in adults. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2005;13(1):33–38. doi: 10.1080/09273940590909220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Woreta F, Thorne JE, Jabs DA, Kedhar SR, Dunn JP. Risk factors for ocular complications and poor visual acuity at presentation among patients with uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(4):647–655. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen CS, Roberton D, Hammerton ME. Juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis: visual outcomes and prognosis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2004;39(6):614–620. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(04)80026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Acharya NR, Tham VM, Esterberg E, Borkar DS, Parker JV, Vinoya AC, et al. Incidence and prevalence of uveitis: results from the Pacific Ocular Inflammation Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(11):1405–1412. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nguyen GC, Torres EA, Regueiro M, Bromfield G, Bitton A, Stempak J, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease characteristics among African Americans, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic Whites: characterization of a large North American cohort. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(5):1012–1023. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Freedman J. Incidence of uveitis in Bantu-speaking negroes of South Africa. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974;58(6):595–599. doi: 10.1136/bjo.58.6.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Greenwood BM. Polyarthritis in Western Nigeria. II. Still’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1969;28(6):617–623. doi: 10.1136/ard.28.6.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schwartz MM, Simpson P, Kerr KL, Jarvis JN. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in African Americans. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(9):1826–1829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Angeles-Han ST, Pelajo CF, Vogler LB, Rouster-Stevens K, Kennedy C, Ponder L, et al. Risk markers of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(12):2088–2096. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cole TS, Frankovich J, Iyer S, Lependu P, Bauer-Mehren A, Shah NH. Profiling risk factors for chronic uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a new model for EHR-based research. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013;11(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-11-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haffejee IE, Raga J, Coovadia HM. Juvenile chronic arthritis in black and Indian South African children. S Afr Med J. 1984;65(13):510–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sen HN, Drye LT, Goldstein DA, Larson TA, Merrill PT, Pavan PR, et al. Hypotony in patients with uveitis: The Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2012;20(2):104–112. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2011.647228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Friedman DS, Holbrook JT, Ansari H, Alexander J, Burke A, Reed SB, et al. Risk of elevated intraocular pressure and glaucoma in patients with uveitis: results of the multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(8):1571–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Freedman J. Anterior uveitis in Bantu children. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973;57(5):355–358. doi: 10.1136/bjo.57.5.355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Angeles-Han ST, McCracken C, Yeh S, Jenkins K, Stryker D, Rouster-Stevens K, et al. Characteristics of a cohort of children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and JIA-associated Uveitis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s12969-015-0018-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shone LP, Dick AW, Brach C, Kimminau KS, LaClair BJ, Shenkman EA, et al. The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP? Pediatrics. 2003;112(6 Pt 2):e521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Abrahao R, Lichtensztajn DY, Ribeiro RC, Marina NM, Keogh RH, Marcos-Gragera R, et al. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in survival among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in California, 1988-2011: A population-based observational study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25544. doi:10.1002/pbc.25544.2015.04.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nussenblatt RB, Mittal KK. Iridocyclitis in black Americans: association with HLA B8 suggests an autoimmune aetiology. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65(5):329–332. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.5.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Merrill PT, Kim J, Cox TA, Betor CC, McCallum RM, Jaffe GJ. Uveitis in the southeastern United States. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16(9):865–874. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.16.9.865.5048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES