We read with interest the paper by Rahman about compliance temperature monitors for scoliosis braces [1]. This study confirms our everyday clinical experience with compliance monitors for braced patients. In fact, since 2010, our institute has systematically applied this kind of monitoring in everyday clinical practice [2]. We already have 2,106 patients in brace treatment who allowed us to monitor them during therapy. Thanks to this large experience, we now know that the use of this tool can improve results for our patients. Today, when braced patients do not accept the use of sensors, treatment becomes more difficult and less accurate. Recently, we interviewed patients and parents who said they would recommend the use of these monitors to other families (unpublished data). The awareness of being monitored, if well managed by explaining to patients and parents its advantages, can increase compliance, as shown in a randomized clinical trial by Miller et al. [3].
We must also report that our results completely differ from those previously published, since the compliance we documented was dramatically higher than what is usually reported (91.7 % of prescription; IC95 56.6–101.7 %), with 60 % of patients wearing the brace as much or even more than required [2]. These results are also maintained in the long term [4], which is probably a result of team management [5] during treatment according to the current SOSORT guidelines [6], and of the application of an externally symmetric and patient-oriented brace (SPoRT Brace) [7]. In addition, we encourage patients to maintain their normal everyday activities, including sports [8–10].
Even though the reliability of compliance through temperature monitors has been demonstrated [11–13], some authors advocate that these devices cannot measure the quality of brace wear; therefore, patients can reach the ‘on’ temperature without wearing the brace at the correct tightness [14]. This could be true in some cases, even if, in our experience, a correct set up of the temperature thresholds could reduce this kind of error. It would have been interesting to know the point of view of the authors and their own experience with the Cricket sensor.
In the current study, the authors reported some concerns related to the variability of brace prescriptions in the sample included in their study. Previous studies did not find a correlation between compliance and dosage, even though most clinicians would expect the highest compliance in night-time brace wear, as it can be considered the easiest dosage. On the contrary, we previously found that the number of hours of brace wearing prescribed (HBW) might positively affect compliance. In our cohort, patients with 23 HBW were more compliant than were those with 18 HBW [2]. This may be justified by the severity of the curve, which may scare patients and motivate them to be adherent, or the simplicity of the prescription. A 1-h break per day is easy to understand and manage as patients must do everything while wearing their brace. The sample considered in our study included only patients with a full-time brace wear prescription (18–23 h per day). The uniformity of the sample can strengthen the reliability of our data. On the contrary, we believe that the heterogeneity of the sample considered for this study can strongly affect the generalizability of their compliance results and lead to an overestimation of their results. In addition, the absence of correlation between prescribed time and compliance can be due to the smaller sample size considered with a greater variability of data, which exposes the study to a higher risk of type I error.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors Sabrina Donzelli, Fabio Zaina and Stefano Negrini, declare that they have no conflict of interest. Stefano Negrini declares that he owns stock of ISICO.
Funding
This study was not funded. It is the authors’ own work.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Contributor Information
Sabrina Donzelli, Email: sabrina.donzelli@isico.it.
Fabio Zaina, Email: fabio.zaina@isico.it.
Stefano Negrini, Email: stefano.negrini@unibs.it.
References
- 1.Rahman T, Sample W, Yorgova P, Neiss G, Rogers K, Shah S, et al. Electronic monitoring of orthopedic brace compliance. J Child Orthop. 2015;28:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0679-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Donzelli S, Zaina F, Negrini S. In defense of adolescents: they really do use braces for the hours prescribed, if good help is provided. Results from a prospective everyday clinic cohort using thermobrace. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miller DJ, Franzone JM, Matsumoto H, Gomez JA, Avendaño J, Hyman JE, et al. Electronic monitoring improves brace-wearing compliance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2012;37(9):717–721. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822f4306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Donzelli S, Zaina F, Negrini S. It is possible to maintain a high compliance even in the long term: results from the Thermobrace study. Scoliosis. 2013;8(Suppl 1):O42. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-S1-O42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tavernaro M, Pellegrini A, Tessadri F, Zaina F, Zonta A, Negrini S. Team care to cure adolescents with braces (avoiding low quality of life, pain and bad compliance): a case-control retrospective study. 2011 SOSORT Award winner. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-7-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Rigo M, Zaina F, International Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) Guidelines on standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research: SOSORT Consensus 2008. Scoliosis. 2009;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-4-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Negrini S, Marchini G, Tessadri F. Brace technology thematic series—the Sforzesco and Sibilla braces, and the SPoRT (symmetric, patient oriented, rigid, three-dimensional, active) concept. Scoliosis. 2011;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Romano M, Negrini S. Does bracing change the sport habits of patients? A controlled study. Scoliosis. 2007;2(Suppl 1):S25. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-2-S1-S25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Romano M, Negrini S. Sports, in association with specific exercises, can help to achieve better results in controlling the evolution of scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2013;8(Suppl 1):O19. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-S1-O19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Negrini S, Romano M, Zaina F, et al. Letter concerning Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the possible harm of bracing and the likely benefit of exercise by Falk. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2015;15(1):208–209. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takemitsu M, Bowen JR, Rahman T, Glutting JJ, Scott CB. Compliance monitoring of brace treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29(18):2070–2074. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000138280.43663.7b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vandal S, Rivard CH, Bradet R. Measuring the compliance behavior of adolescents wearing orthopedic braces. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1999;22(2–3):59–73. doi: 10.1080/014608699265293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hunter LN, Sison-Williamson M, Mendoza MM, McDonald CM, Molitor F, Mulcahey MJ, et al. The validity of compliance monitors to assess wearing time of thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthoses in children with spinal cord injury. Spine. 2008;33(14):1554–1561. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178864e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chalmers E, Westover L, Jacob J, Donauer A, Zhao VH, Parent EC, Moreau MJ, Mahood JK, Hedden DM, Lou EH. Predicting success or failure of brace treatment for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015;53(10):1001–1009. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1306-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]