Abstract
Podophage Percy infects Caulobacter crescentus, a Gram-negative bacterium that divides asymmetrically and is a commonly used model organism to study the cell cycle, asymmetric cell division, and cell differentiation. Here, we announce the sequence and annotated complete genome of the phiKMV-like podophage Percy and note its prominent features.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Caulobacter crescentus is a nonpathogenic bacterium that is found in diverse environments, especially fresh water lakes and soil (1). Cell division in C. crescentus is asymmetrical and yields two types of cells that are structurally and functionally different: swarmer cells and stalked cells (2). Caulobacter phages have been used to study host genetic regulation and morphogenesis via generalized transduction, but typically these are large, virulent myophages or siphophages with prolate capsids (3–5). Here, we describe the complete genome of Percy, a newly isolated phiKMV-like podophage which infects C. crescentus strain CB15.
Bacteriophage Percy was isolated from a water sample collected in College Station, Texas, USA. Phage DNA was sequenced using 454 pyrosequencing at the Emory GRA Genome Center (Emory University, GA, USA). Trimmed FLX Titanium reads were assembled to a single contig at 41.7-fold coverage using the Newbler assembler version 2.5.3 (454 Life Sciences) at default settings. The contig was confirmed to be complete by PCR using primers that face the upstream and downstream ends of the contig. Products from the PCR amplification of the junctions of concatemeric molecules were sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Eton Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Genes were predicted using GeneMarkS (6) and corrected using software tools available on the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) Galaxy instance (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-public). Morphology was determined using transmission electron microscopy performed at the Texas A&M University Microscopy and Imaging Center.
Percy has a 44,773-bp unit genome (does not include the terminal repeat), a coding density of 94%, 55 predicted coding sequences, and a G+C content of 60.9%. Of the 55 predicted coding sequences, 21 are novel, 9 are conserved, and 25 have an annotated gene function predicted by BLASTp, InterPro Scan, and CDD analyses (7–9). The G+C content of the phage is lower than that of its host (67.2%) (10). A 201-bp terminal repeat was determined using the PAUSE method on raw sequencing data (https://cpt.tamu.edu/pause), resulting in a packaged genome of 44,974 bp. Percy shares 49.7% and 53.8% nucleotide sequence identity across the genome with Pseudomonas phage phiKMV (NC_005045) and Caulobacter phage Cd1 (GU393987), respectively, as determined by Emboss Stretcher (11). Core gene analysis shows that Percy and Cd1 share 66% homology (31 out of 47 genes) (12). Most of the differences between the two phages are in hypothetical proteins of unknown function.
As a phiKMV-like phage, Percy encodes a T3/T7-like RNA polymerase that is downstream from the replication genes rather than in the early gene region, as is the case in Enterobacteria phage T7 (NC_001604) (13). The DNA ligase of Percy is located upstream of the RNA polymerase and is out of place compared to most phiKMV-like phages (14). Percy also encodes a phiKMV-like internal head protein with a predicted C-terminal lysozyme domain that presumably plays a role in infection as an injection needle component (15, 16). To accomplish lysis, Percy encodes a pinholin, signal anchor release endolysin, and partially imbedded spanin genes (17–19).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The genome sequence of phage Percy was deposited in GenBank under the accession number KT381879.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported primarily by funding from award number EF-0949351, “Whole Phage Genomics: A Student-Based Approach,” from the National Science Foundation. Additional support came from the Center for Phage Technology, an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas AgriLife, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.
We are grateful for the advice and support of the CPT staff. This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Phage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.
Footnotes
Citation Lerma RA, Tidwell TJ, Cahill JL, Rasche ES, Kuty Everett GF. 2015. Complete genome sequence of Caulobacter crescentus podophage Percy. Genome Announc 3(6):e01373-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01373-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Poindexter JS. 1981. The caulobacters: ubiquitous unusual bacteria. Microbiol Res 45:123–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ausmees N, Jacobs-Wagner C. 2003. Spatial and temporal control of differentiation and cell cycle progression in Caulobacter crescentus. Annu Rev Microbiol 57:225–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.091006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bender RA. 1981. Improved generalized transducing bacteriophage for Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol 148:734–735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ely B, Johnson RC. 1977. Generalized transduction in Caulobacter crescentus. Genetics 87:391–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gill JJ, Berry JD, Russell WK, Lessor L, Escobar-Garcia DA, Hernandez D, Kane A, Keene J, Maddox M, Martin R, Mohan S, Thorn AM, Russell DH, Young R. 2012. The Caulobacter crescentus phage phiCbK: genomics of a canonical phage. BMC Genomics 13:542. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Das U, Daugherty L, Duquenne L, Finn RD, Gough J, Haft D, Hulo N, Kahn D, Kelly E, Laugraud A, Letunic I, Lonsdale D, Lopez R, Madera M, Maslen J, McAnulla C, McDowall J, Mistry J, Mitchell A, Mulder N, Natale D, Orengo C, Quinn AF, Selengut JD, Sigrist CJ, Thimma M, Thomas PD, Valentin F, Wilson D, Wu CH, Yeats C. 2009. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D211–D215. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Omelchenko MV, Robertson CL, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zhang N, Zheng C, Bryant SH. 2011. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D225–D229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nierman WC, Feldblyum TV, Laub MT, Paulsen IT, Nelson KE, Eisen J, Heidelberg JF, Alley MRK, Ohta N, Maddock JR, Potocka I, Nelson WC, Newton A, Stephens C, Phadke ND, Ely B, DeBoy RT, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Gwinn ML, Haft DH, Kolonay JF, Smit J, Craven MB, Khouri H, Shetty J, Berry K, Utterback T, Tran K, Wolf A, Vamathevan J, Ermolaeva M, White O, Salzberg SL, Venter JC, Shapiro L, Fraser CM. 2001. Complete genome sequence of Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4136–4141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061029298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Myers EW, Miller W. 1988. Optimal alignments in linear space. Comput Appl Biosci 4:11–17. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zafar N, Mazumder R, Seto D. 2002. CoreGenes: a computational tool for identifying and cataloging “core” genes in a set of small genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 3:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-3-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McAllister WT, Wu HL. 1978. Regulation of transcription of the late genes of bacteriophage T7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:804–808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Adriaenssens EM, Ceyssens P-, Dunon V, Ackermann H-W, Van Vaerenbergh J, Maes M, De Proft M, Lavigne R. 2011. Bacteriophages LIMElight and LIMEzero of Pantoea agglomerans, belonging to the “phiKMV-like viruses.” Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3443–3450. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00128-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lavigne R, Noben JP, Hertveldt K, Ceyssens PJ, Briers Y, Dumont D, Roucourt B, Krylov VN, Mesyanzhinov VV, Robben J, Volckaert G. 2006. The structural proteome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophage phiKMV. Microbiology 152:529–534. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28431-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Van Hecke K, Briers Y, Derua R, Waelkens E, Lavigne R, Van Meervelt L. 2008. Structural analysis of bacteriophage-encoded peptidoglycan hydrolase domain KMV36C: crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 64:263–265. doi: 10.1107/S1744309108004569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pang T, Fleming TC, Pogliano K, Young R. 2013. Visualization of pinholin lesions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E2054–E2063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222283110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun Q, Kuty GF, Arockiasamy A, Xu M, Young R, Sacchettini JC. 2009. Regulation of a muralytic enzyme by dynamic membrane topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1192–1194. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Berry J, Rajaure M, Pang T, Young R. 2012. The spanin complex is essential for lambda lysis. J Bacteriol 194:5667–5674. doi: 10.1128/JB.01245-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]