Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated socio-demographic factors of passive smoking among women in Jilin Province, China. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012, using a self-reported questionnaire interview. A representative sample of 9788 non-smoking women aged 18–79 years was collected in Jilin Province of China by a multistage stratified random cluster sampling design. Descriptive data analysis and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of prevalence/frequency were conducted. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to examine the associated socio-demographic factors of passive smoking. Results: The overall prevalence of passive smoking among non-smoking women in Jilin Province was 60.6% (95% CI: 59.3–61.8), 58.3% (95% CI: 56.7–59.9) from urban areas, and 63.4% (95% CI: 61.6–65.3) from rural areas. Twenty-six percent (95% CI: 24.9–27.1) of the non-smoking women reported daily passive smoking, of which 42.9% (95% CI: 41.6–44.1) reported passive smoking at home, and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.5–5.7) reported passive smoking in restaurants. Women in urban areas were less likely to be passive smokers than those in rural ones (OR-Odds Ratio: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.729–0.935), elderly women were less likely to be passive smokers than younger women (55–64 years OR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.342–0.674; 65–79 years OR: 0.351, 95% CI: 0.241–0.511). Seperated/divorced women were less likely to be passive smokers (OR: 0.701, 95% CI: 0.500–0.982), and widowed women (OR: 0.564, 95%CI: 0.440–0.722), as the married were the reference group. Retired women second-hand smoked due to environmental causes significantly less than manual workers (OR: 0.810, 95% CI: 0.708–0.928). Women with a monthly family income of more than 5000 RMB were less likely to be passive smokers than those with an income less than 500 RMB (OR: 0.615, 95% CI: 0.432–0.876). Conclusions: The prevalence of passive smoking is lower than that reported in 2010 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) China, but passive smoking is still prevalent and has been an acute public health problem among non-smoking women in Jilin Province, China. Our findings suggest an urgent need for tobacco control and the efforts of public health should be both comprehensive and focus on high-risk populations in Jilin Province, China.
Keywords: passive smoking, prevalence, socio-demographic factors, adult females
1. Introduction
Smoking and passive smoking are a major global public health problem, a major influence factor of chronic diseases and neonatal death, and the major global preventable risk factors of death [1,2,3]. There are more than 1.1 billion smokers around the world, and the number of smokers is increasing sharply at a rate of 2% per year [4]. World Health Organization reported that tobacco use contributed to more than five million deaths a year; if no efficient measures towards tobacco control are enacted, the deaths by tobacco use will increase to 10 million, and 80% of them will be concentrated in developing countries [4]. China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of tobacco products [5]. The 2002 and 2010 national survey suggested that the prevalence of smoking has been declining, but passive smoking status is still serious: 51.9% of non-smokers were regularly exposed to passive smoking in 2002 and 72.4% in 2010 [6,7]. Previous studies [8,9,10] have shown that passive smoking can increase the risk of cancers, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, and damage lung function, and is especially detrimental to the health of women and children. More than 10 million deaths are caused by passive smoking annually, according to a 2002 national survey, and women are the major victims, with more than 90% of women exposed at home [6]. Passive smoking is highly prevalent among women and has been a major concern in China.
Multivariable evidence showed that passive smoking is associated with socio-demographic factors [11,12,13,14]. People with a low socio-demographic status are more likely to smoke and the inverse association between educational status and passive smoking has been confirmed in Asia areas [12,15,16]. However, previous studies have mostly focused on male or population data [17,18]; thus few data are available concerning the relationship between passive smoking and socio-demographic factors among non-smoking women in Jilin Province, China. It is critical that we understand the socio-demographic factors associated with passive smoking among non-smoking women; only through understanding these risk factors can we hope to enact effective tobacco control policies to protect the population. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated socio-demographic factors of passive smoking among women in Jilin Province, China.
2. Experimental Section
The study data were acquired from the Project on Present Situation and Change Forecast of Disease Spectrum in Jilin Province of China. The investigation was a population-based cross-sectional survey. Multistage stratified cluster sampling method was used to select the study sample of populations aged 18–79 years and who had lived in Jilin Province, China for at least six months. The multistage stratified cluster sampling method was used to select the study sample. Nine regions (Changchun, Jilin, Siping, Liaoyuan, Tonghua, Baishan, Songyuan, Baicheng, and Yanbian), 32 districts or counties, 95 town or communities, and 45 units in Jilin Province were selected. Lastly, all adult resident were selected from each household of the selected town or communities. The detailed stratifying process was reported previously [19]. 23,050 Subjects aged over 18 years were recruited. 21,435 Subjects completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 84.9%. Response rates of urban and rural areas were 81.8% and 88.6%, respectively. A total of 9788 non-smoking women were chosen by the study. Ethical approval was obtained by Jilin University School of Public Health, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
All interviews were conducted by trained investigators. The questionnaire included information on socio-demographic characteristics and passive smoking status. “Passive smoking” was defined as those who perceived to be or were exposed to second-hand smoke or a smoking environment from smokers during past seven days.
All data analyses were weighted to make the sample representative of the population in Jilin Province by post-stratification adjustment according to the following factors: region, urban/rural, age, and gender groups, according to the 2010 China (Jilin Province) Population Census. Descriptive data analysis and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of prevalence/frequency were conducted. Rao-Scott Chi-square tests were used to compare the prevalence of passive smoking in different groups. In order to adjust for potential confounding effects, multiple logistic regression analyses were carried out to find the independent factors associated with passive smoking. In the regression model, seven covariates were included to study the associations between socioeconomic characteristics towards tobacco control with passive smoking among non-smoking females. The Cox and Snell test was used to evaluate the overall model performance, which performed steadily (Cox and Snell test: p = 0.259). All data were analyzed by the complex sampling function of SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), and p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
The sample included 9788 non-smoking females, representative of the general Jilin Province non-smoking women aged 18 years and over by socio-economic characteristics (Table 1). In the study, the mean age was 47.24 ± 12.88 years, 56.2% from the urban area, and 91.8% were Han Chinese. The majority of the subjects were between 35–54 years of age, 23.8% were aged between 35–44; 74.3% attained an education level junior middle school or higher; 81.0% were married; 46.4% were manual workers; and 35.4% had a family monthly income between 1000 and 2000 RMB.
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics among non-smoking women aged 18 years or over in Jilin Province, China.
| Characteristics | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Region | ||
| Urban | 5232 | 56.2 |
| Rural | 4556 | 43.8 |
| Ethnic | ||
| Han | 9030 | 91.8 |
| Minorities | 758 | 8.2 |
| Age | ||
| 18–24 | 447 | 15.0 |
| 25–34 | 1218 | 18.9 |
| 35–44 | 2465 | 23.8 |
| 45–54 | 2720 | 20.4 |
| 55–64 | 2018 | 13.7 |
| 65–79 | 920 | 8.1 |
| Education | ||
| Primary school and below | 3126 | 25.7 |
| Junior middle school | 2720 | 29.4 |
| Senior middle school | 2398 | 24.9 |
| College and above | 1544 | 20.1 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 8470 | 81.0 |
| Single | 517 | 12.4 |
| Separated/Divorced | 159 | 1.5 |
| Widowed | 642 | 5.1 |
| Occupation | ||
| Manual | 4768 | 46.4 |
| Skilled | 1982 | 23.6 |
| Retired | 3038 | 29.9 |
| Family monthly income | ||
| <500 | 2048 | 17.4 |
| 500–999 | 1921 | 19.1 |
| 1000–1999 | 3116 | 35.4 |
| 2000–2999 | 1483 | 18.0 |
| 3000–4999 | 635 | 7.8 |
| ≥5000 | 197 | 2.3 |
Note: Complex weighted computation was used in the statistical analysis.
The percent distribution of passive smoking of Jilin Province women aged 18 years or over in 2012 is given in Table 2. Overall, 60.6% (95% CI: 59.3–61.8) of Jilin Province non-smoking women described themselves as passive smokers (58.3% of urban and 63.4% of rural). During the past seven days, 26.0% (95% CI: 24.9–27.1) of the non-smoking women reported daily passive smoking exposure, 13.9% (95% CI: 13.1–14.8) were passive smokers more than three days per week, and 20.3% (95% CI: 19.3–21.4) less than three days per week. The frequency distributions of passive smoking in urban were higher than that in rural. Approximately 42.9% (95% CI: 41.6–44.1) of passive smoking exposure was at home, 15.2% (95% CI: 14.3–16.2) at workplaces, and 8.6% (95% CI: 7.9–9.3) in social environments. However, the proportion report of passive smoking in restaurant was lower (5.1%) (95% CI: 4.5–5.7).
Table 2.
Percent distribution and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of passive smoking among non-smoking women aged 18 years or over in Jilin Province, China.
| Characteristics | Urban (n = 5232) % (95% CI) (n) |
Rural (n = 4556) % (95% CI) (n) |
Total (n = 9788) % (95% CI) (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passive smoking | 58.3 (56.7–59.9) (2976) | 63.4 (61.6–65.3) (2731) | 60.6 (59.3–61.8) (5707) |
| Frequency per week | |||
| Everyday | 21.8 (20.5–23.1) (1171) | 31.3 (29.5–33.2) (1386) | 26.0 (24.9–27.1) (2557) |
| ≥3 d/week | 14.0 (12.9–15.2) (729) | 13.8 (12.6–15.2) (617) | 13.9 (13.1–14.8) (1346) |
| 1–3 d/week | 22.3 (20.9–23.7) (1076) | 17.7 (16.2–19.4) (728) | 20.3 (19.3–21.4) (1804) |
| Sources of Passive smoking | |||
| Home | 37.9 (36.3–39.4) (2004) | 49.3 (47.3–51.2) (2198) | 42.9 (41.6–44.1) (4202) |
| Workplace | 18.5 (17.3–19.8) (894) | 11.0 (9.8–12.4) (411) | 15.2 (14.3–16.2) (1305) |
| Restaurant | 6.5 (5.7–7.3) (304) | 3.3 (2.6–4.3) (113) | 5.1 (4.5–5.7) (417) |
| Entertainment places | 8.9 (8.0–10.0) (414) | 8.1 (7.1–9.3) (346) | 8.6 (7.9–9.3) (760) |
| Other | 2.2 (1.8–2.7) (113) | 2.1 (1.7–2.7) (92) | 2.1 (1.8–2.5) (205) |
Note: Complex weighted computation was used in the statistical analysis.
Table 3 describes prevalence of passive smoking among non-smoking women aged 18 years or over by socio-demographic characteristics in Jilin Province, China. Passive smoking among non-smoking women was similar between Han (60.5%, 95% CI: 59.2–61.8) and Minorities (61.0%, 95% CI: 56.7–65.2). The majority of passive smokers were between 18–34 year olds, and the prevalence of passive smoking declined by age; 66.8 (61.6–71.6) from 18–24 year olds, 65.9 (62.9–68.7) from 25–34 year olds, 65.6 (63.6–67.6) from 35–44 year olds, 60.6 (58.7–62.5) from 45–54 year olds, 50.4 (47.9–52.8) from 55–64 year olds, and 38.9 (34.9–43.0) from 65–79 year olds. There were fewer passive smokers among those with lower education level (55.8%, 95% CI: 53.7–57.9), widowed (35.0%, 95% CI: 30.2–40.1), retired women (51.7%, 95% CI: 49.3–54.1) and among women whose family monthly income is more than 5000 RMB (53.4%, 95% CI: 45.3–61.4).
Table 3.
Prevalence of passive smoking among non-smoking women aged 18 years or over by socio-demographic characteristics in Jilin Province, China.
| Characteristic | Urban % (95% CI) (n) | Rural % (95% CI) (n) | Total % (95% CI) (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnic | |||
| Han | 58.2 (56.6–59.9) (2731) | 63.4 (61.5–65.4) (2542) | 60.5 (59.2–61.8) (5273) |
| Minorities | 59.4 (53.8–64.8) (245) | 63.4 (56.3–70.0) (189) | 61.0 (56.7–65.2) (434) |
| Age | |||
| 18–24 | 62.0 (55.3–68.2) (184) | 72.4 (64.0–79.5) (117) | 66.8 (61.6–71.6) (301) |
| 25–34 | 65.1 (61.3–68.7) (477) | 66.8 (62.2–71.1) (325) | 65.9 (62.9–68.7) (802) |
| 35–44 | 63.0 (60.3–65.7) (873) | 69.0 (66.0–71.8) (745) | 65.6 (63.6–67.6) (1618) |
| 45–54 | 60.3 (57.6–63.0) (820) | 61.0 (58.2–63.7) (817) | 60.6 (58.7–62.5) (1637) |
| 55–64 | 47.9 (44.3–51.5) (446) | 53.6 (50.4–56.7) (566) | 50.4 (47.9–52.8) (1012) |
| 65–79 | 37.2 (31.6–43.1) (176) | 41.7 (36.4–47.1) (161) | 38.9 (34.9–43.0) (337) |
| Education | |||
| Primary school and below | 43.5 (39.4–47.6) (344) | 60.4 (58.0–62.8) (1338) | 55.8 (53.7–57.9) (1682) |
| Junior middle school | 58.8 (55.8–61.8) (780) | 66.6 (63.2–69.9) (826) | 62.8 (60.5–65.1) (1606) |
| Senior middle school | 60.0 (57.3–62.6) (1091) | 62.3 (57.0–67.4) (345) | 60.5 (58.1–62.8) (1436) |
| College and above | 62.5 (59.1–65.7) (761) | 66.7 (59.0–73.5) (222) | 63.4 (60.3–66.4) (983) |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 59.3 (57.6–60.9) (2528) | 64.8 (63.0–66.7) (2556) | 61.9 (60.6–63.1) (5084) |
| Single | 63.3 (57.4–68.8) (269) | 63.8 (51.8–74.2) (66) | 63.4 (58.1–68.4) (335) |
| Separated/Divorced | 46.9 (38.0–55.9) (58) | 77.2 (59.2–88.8) (20) | 52.6 (44.3–60.8) (78) |
| Widowed | 36.5 (29.8–43.6) (121) | 32.5 (26.7–38.8) (89) | 35.0 (30.2–40.1) (210) |
| Occupation | |||
| Manual | 64.3 (61.7–66.8) (1100) | 64.6 (62.4–66.8) (1839) | 64.5 (62.8–66.1) (2939) |
| Skilled | 64.0 (61.1–66.8) (910) | 64.3 (58.5–69.7) (353) | 64.1 (61.5–66.6) (1263) |
| Retired | 48.2 (45.5–51.0) (966) | 59.4 (54.9–63.7) (539) | 51.7 (49.3–54.1) (1505) |
| Family monthly income | |||
| <500 | 57.1 (52.1–62.0) (251) | 60.6 (57.7–63.5) (903) | 59.7 (57.2–62.2) (1154) |
| 500–999 | 53.1 (49.1–57.1) (431) | 64.4 (60.6–67.9) (698) | 59.7 (56.9–62.4) (1129) |
| 1000–1999 | 58.9 (56.4–61.3) (1204) | 66.9 (62.9–70.6) (618) | 61.5 (59.4–63.6) (1822) |
| 2000–2999 | 58.9 (55.2–62.6) (614) | 65.5 (59.3–71.1) (278) | 60.8 (57.7–63.9) (892) |
| 3000–4999 | 64.7 (59.7–69.5) (299) | 69.8 (59.9–78.1) (98) | 65.9 (61.5–70.2) (397) |
| ≥5000 | 50.2 (41.2–59.2) (77) | 65.7 (46.6–80.8) (30) | 53.4 (45.3–61.4) (107) |
Note: Complex weighted computation was used in the statistical analysis.
Table 4 describes the associations between socio-demographic factors and passive smoking by multivariable logistic regression. Participants residing in urban areas were less likely to passively smoke than those in rural (OR: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.729–0.935). Participants aged 45–79 years old were less likely to passively smoke compared to those aged 18–24 years old (45–54 years old (OR: 0.655, 95% CI: 0.472–0.910), 55–64 years old (OR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.342–0.674), and 65–79 years old (OR: 0.351, 95% CI: 0.241–0.511)). Separated/Divorced (OR: 0.701, 95% CI: 0.500–0.982) and Widowed (OR: 0.564, 95% CI: 0.440–0.722) were less likely to passively smoke than married females. Retired women (OR: 0.810, 95% CI: 0.708–0.928) were also associated with a lower likelihood of passively smoking. Participants with a family monthly income of 5000 RMB and over (OR: 0.615, 95% CI: 0.432–0.876) were less likely to passive smoking than those with income of 500 RMB and less. Education level was not associated with passive smoking.
Table 4.
Association between socio-demographic factors and passive smoking among non-smoking women aged 18 years or over, Jilin Province, China.
| Characteristic | p | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnic | |||
| Minorities | 1 | ||
| Han | 0.66 | 0.96 | 0.78–1.17 |
| Region | |||
| Rural | 1 | ||
| Urban | <0.01 | 0.82 | 0.73–0.94 |
| Age | |||
| 18–24 | 1 | ||
| 25–34 | 0.08 | 0.75 | 0.54–1.03 |
| 35–44 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 0.55–1.07 |
| 45–54 | <0.01 | 0.66 | 0.47–0.91 |
| 55–64 | <0.01 | 0.48 | 0.34–0.67 |
| 65–79 | <0.01 | 0.35 | 0.24–0.51 |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 1 | ||
| Single | 0.379 | 0.87 | 0.63–1.19 |
| Separated/Divorced | <0.03 | 0.70 | 0.50–0.93 |
| Widowed | <0.01 | 0.56 | 0.44–0.72 |
| Occupation | |||
| Manual | 1 | ||
| Skilled | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.83–1.17 |
| Retired | <0.01 | 0.81 | 0.71–0.93 |
| Education | |||
| Primary school and below | 1 | ||
| Junior middle school | 0.13 | 1.12 | 0.97–1.31 |
| Senior middle school | 0.53 | 1.06 | 0.89–1.25 |
| College and above | 0.20 | 1.16 | 0.92–1.46 |
| Family monthly income | |||
| <500 | 1 | ||
| 500–999 | 0.26 | 0.91 | 0.78–1.07 |
| 1000–1999 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.86–1.17 |
| 2000–2999 | 0.16 | 0.87 | 0.72–1.06 |
| 3000–4999 | 0.68 | 1.05 | 0.83–1.34 |
| ≥5000 | <0.01 | 0.62 | 0.43–0.88 |
Notes: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; Complex weighted computation was used in the statistical analysis.
4. Discussion
In recent years, multiple epidemiological studies have been performed on smoking of males and whole populations, but there is little data on the status of passive smoking on non-smoking women in Jilin Province, China. Knowing the association factors of passive smoking can be useful in reducing the prevalence of passive smoking to protect women in Jilin Province, China. Our study was the first large population-based survey to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of passive smoking among non-smoking women in Jilin Province, China. The study indicated a high prevalence of passive smoking among non-smoking women in Jilin Province, even though it was lower than the rates from the China Global Adults Tobacco Survey in 2010 (GATS, 71.6%) [7]. There were also a high prevalence of passive smoking among non-smoking women at both home and work places, but it was lower than reported by 2010 GAST China (63.9% and 53.2%, respectively) [7]. We suggest that restaurants in China should be smoke-free, especially high-end and fast-food restaurants to reduce high SHS exposure there. Moreover, compared with restaurants, people spend more time at workplace or home. Thus, they have more exposure SHS opportunities at work and in their home compared to restaurants.
All of this might be due to tobacco control efforts and people paying more attention to smoking. The high prevalence of passive smoking among non-smoking women suggests that an urgent need to control tobacco for non-smoking women.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the associations between socio-demographic factors and passive smoking. More than half of Han and Minorities women were passive smokers. The likelihood of being a passive smoker was not different between ethnic minorities and Han. Due to the differences of culture and lifestyles between Han and Minorities, there is a need for further investigation of this aspect. Women in rural areas were more likely to be passive smokers than those in urban areas, which is consistent with previous studies [17,20]. The possible explanations for the results are that rural area populations may lack information and knowledge about passive smoking, and a lower education level than urban women [5,13,15], and thus rural areas are the target market for much of the tobacco industry. Compared with rural areas, urban areas often participate in anti-smoking campaigns and receive tobacco control education. The prevalence among women aged between 55 and 64 has begun to decline and they are less likely to have the impact of passive smoking, as the prevalence of people who quit smoking between 55 and 64 years is rising. As people get older, they realize that smoking is a risk factor for a variety of chronic diseases and thus become more health consciousness and to promote better health, change poor lifestyle choices like smoking, which is consistent with previous studies [6,21]. There is a lower prevalence of passive smoking among women aged 65 year old and over in our study, which is consistent with previous studies [15,22,23]. Possible explanations for the finding include the elderly have more time and energy to consider their health with age and participate in anti-smoking campaigns. Separated/Divorced and Widowed women were found to passive smoke less than married or single women, which is consistent with results reported before [24,25]. This might be due to a majority of these women living alone and less likely to be exposed to smoke at home. Manual workers were more likely to be passive smokers than skilled laborers and retired women. The finding is consistent with previous studies [26]. This might be due to manual female workers having a low socioeconomic status and face more psychosocial and physical stressors. Prior studies [14,27] found that the higher an individual’s education and income were, the less likely they were to be a smoker; however, we found that the prevalence of passive smoking among women were all more than 50%. This might be because women who have a high socioeconomic status tend to also be married and therefore have a higher likelihood to be exposed to smoke.
The strength of the study lies in the large population-based representative sample survey. The limitation of the study is the properties of the cross-sectional study and the recall bias of all self-reported questionnaire interviews. Besides, the definitions and frequency of passive smoking were not measurements, and participants who were too weak or ill to complete the interviews were excluded.
5. Conclusions
The prevalence of passive smoking is lower than that reported in 2010 GATS China, but passive smoking is still prevalent and has been an acute public health problem among non-smoking women in Jilin Province, China. Our findings suggest an urgent need for tobacco control in Jilin Province, China and the efforts of public health authorities should be both comprehensive and focus on high-risk populations.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants from Jilin Province of China and interviewers from Jilin University. This study was supported by grants from the Center for Disease Prevention and Control in Jilin Province.
Author Contributions
Zhijun Li, Yan Yao, Yawen Liu, Yuchun Tao, Changgui Kou, and Bo Li designed the study. Zhijun Li, Yan Yao, Weiqing Han, Lingling Jiang, and Yan Yao performed the study. Zhijun Li analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. Yan Yao, Zhijun Li, Weiqing Han, Huiping Zhang, Lingling Jiang, and Yan Yao participated in revising the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Jradi H., Al-Shehri A. Knowledge about tobacco smoking among medical students in Saudi Arabia: Findings from three medical schools. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health. 2014;4:269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2014.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pampel F., Legleye S., Goffette C., Piontek D., Kraus L., Khlat M. Cohort changes in educational disparities in smoking: France, Germany and the United States. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014;127:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization . Health Systems Financing: The Path to Universal Coverage. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization . WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008: The MPOWER Package. World Health Organization; Geneva, Swizerland: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cai L., Wu X., Goyal A., Han Y., Cui W., Xiao X. Patterns and socioeconomic influences of tobacco exposure in tobacco cultivating rural areas of Yunnan Province. BMC Public Health. 2012;12 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang G.H., Ma J.M., Liu N., Zhou L.N. Survey of smoking and passive smoking in Chinese population 2002. Chin. J. Epidemiol. 2005;26:77–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang G.H. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) China 2010 Country Report. China Sanxia Press; Beijing, China: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang X., Shu X.O., Yang G., Li H.L., Xiang Y.B., Gao Y.-T., Li Q., Zheng W. Association of passive smoking by husbands with prevalence of stroke among Chinese women nonsmokers. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005;161:213–218. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Moriarty J.P., Branda M.E., Olsen K.D., Shah N.D., Borah B.J., Wagie A.E., Egginton J.S., Naessens J.M. The effects of incremental costs of smoking and obesity on health care costs among adults: A 7-year longitudinal study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012;54:286–291. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318246f1f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.He Y., Lam T.H., Jiang B., Wang J., Sai X., Fan L., Li X., Qin Y., Hu F.B. Combined effects of tobacco smoke exposure and metabolic syndrome on cardiovascular risk in older residents of China. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;53:363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siahpush M., McNeill A., Borland R., Fong G.T. Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob. Control. 2006;15(Suppl. S3):iii71–iii75. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ponniah S., Bloomfield A. Sociodemographic characteristics of New Zealand adult smokers, ex-smokers, and non-smokers: Results from the 2006 Census. N. Z. Med. J. 2008;121:34–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaleta D., Makowiec-Dabrowska T., Dziankowska-Zaborszczyk E., Fronczak A. Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of daily cigarette smoking in Poland: Results from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (2009–2010) Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2012;25:126–136. doi: 10.2478/S13382-012-0016-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Daponte-Codina A., Bolívar-Muñoz J., Ocaña-Riola R., Toro-Cárdenas S., Mayoral-Cortés J. Patterns of smoking according to individual social position, and to socio-economic environment in municipal areas, Spain 1987–2001. Health Place. 2009;15:709–716. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lee B.-E., Ha E.-H. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke among South Korean adults: A cross-sectional study of the 2005 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Environ. Health. 2011;10 doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lam T.S., Tse L.A., Yu I.T., Griffiths S. Prevalence of smoking and environmental tobacco smoke exposure, and attitudes and beliefs towards tobacco control among Hong Kong medical students. Public Health. 2009;123:42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin X., Yan Y., Qiang L.I., Cong-Xiao W., Gong-Huan Y. Population-based survey of secondhand smoke exposure in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2010;23:430–436. doi: 10.1016/S0895-3988(11)60003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang T., Li F., Yang X., Wu Z., Feng X., Wang Y., Wang X., Abdullah A.S. Smoking patterns and sociodemographic factors associated with tobacco use among Chinese rural male residents: A descriptive analysis. BMC Public Health. 2008;8 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang S., Kou C., Liu Y., Li B., Tao Y., D’Arcy C., Shi J., Wu Y., Liu J., Zhu Y., et al. Rural-urban differences in the prevalence of chronic disease in Northeast China. Asia-Pac. J. Public Health. 2015;27:394–406. doi: 10.1177/1010539514551200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Qiu J., He X., Cui H., Zhang C., Zhang H., Dang Y., Han X., Chen Y., Tang Z., Zhang H., et al. Passive smoking and preterm birth in urban China. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014;180:94–102. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang G., Wang Y., Wu Y., Yang J., Wan X. The road to effective tobacco control in China. Lancet. 2015;385:1019–1028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60174-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yao T., Sung H.Y., Mao Z., Hu T.W., Max W. Secondhand smoke exposure at home in rural China. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:S109–S115. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-9900-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim S.K., Park J.H., Lee J.J., Lee S.B., Kim T.H., Han J.W., Youn J.C., Jhoo J.H., Lee D.Y., Kim K.W. Smoking in elderly Koreans: Prevalence and factors associated with smoking cessation. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2013;56:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li Q., Jason H., Yang. G. Prevalence of smoking in China in 2010. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:2469–2470. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1102459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tanaka K., Miyake Y., Hanioka T., Arakawa M. Active and passive smoking and prevalence of periodontal disease in young Japanese women. J. Periodontal Res. 2013;48:600–605. doi: 10.1111/jre.12044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hiscock R., Bauld L., Amos A., Fidler J.A., Munafo M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1248:107–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lim H.K., Ghazali S.M., Kee C.C., Lim K.K., Chan Y.Y., Teh H.C. Epidemiology of smoking among Malaysian adult males: Prevalence and associated factors. BMC Public Health. 2013;13 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]