Skip to main content
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2015 May 11;6(22):18780–18789. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3909

MYC-repressed long noncoding RNAs antagonize MYC-induced cell proliferation and cell cycle progression

Taewan Kim 1,#, Ri Cui 2,#, Young-Jun Jeon 2, Paolo Fadda 2, Hansjuerg Alder 2, Carlo M Croce 2
PMCID: PMC4662455  PMID: 26003165

Abstract

The transcription factor MYC is a proto-oncogene regulating cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis and metabolism. The recent identification of MYC-regulated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) expands our knowledge of the role of lncRNAs in MYC functions. Here, we identify MYC-repressed lncRNAs named MYCLo-4, -5 and -6 by comparing 3 categories of lncRNAs (downregulated in highly MYC-expressing colorectal cancer, up-regulated by MYC knockdown in HCT116, upregulated by MYC knockdown in RKO). The MYC-repressed MYCLos are implicated in MYC-modulated cell proliferation through cell cycle regulation. By screening cell cycle-related genes regulated by MYC and the MYC-repressed MYCLos, we identified the MYC-repressed gene GADD45A as a target gene of the MYC-repressed MYCLos such as MYCLo-4 and MYCLo-6.

Keywords: MYC, long noncoding RNA, cell proliferation, cell cycle

INTRODUCTION

MYC is a transcription factor regulating global gene expression through heterodimerization with the protein myc-associated factor X (MAX) [13]. Through the genome-wide regulation of gene expression, MYC is involved in diverse cellular processes including cell growth, cell cycle, apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell differentiation and genomic instability [4]. MYC has also been found to be implicated in various biological phenomena and diseases such as healthy life span, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington disease, Parkinson disease and cancer [57].

The majority of MYC studies focus on its function in cancer due to the critical role of MYC in human cancer [5]. MYC is primarily overexpressed and/or amplified in numerous types of cancer through various mechanisms such as retroviral transduction and MYC translocation [4, 5, 8]. In addition, posttranscriptional regulation of MYC also contributes on the overexpression of MYC in cancer. For instance, the stability of MYC protein modulated by phosphorylation is regulated by promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) protein and long noncoding RNA PVT1 [9, 10].

Of the various members of noncoding RNAs, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are characterized by their size (larger than 200 nucleotides). Recently, many studies have revealed versatile functions of lncRNAs in gene expression modulation through various routes such as transcriptional, posttranscriptional, posttranslational and epigenetic regulation [10, 11]. Differential expression of the lncRNAs in various diseases implies the potential role of lncRNAs as therapeutic targets in the diseases [12]. Likewise, a cohort of lncRNAs has been reported and investigated in cancer. For instance, 8 CCAT family members from CCAT1 (CARLo-5) to CCAT8 were identified in colorectal cancer (CRC) [1316]. Numerous PCAT family members were also found in prostate cancer [17]. In addition, a few lncRNAs such as BCAR4 and HOTAIR have a role in cancer metastasis [18, 19].

Recent studies profiled and identified lncRNAs that are regulated by MYC [13, 20, 21]. These studies show that many lncRNAs are commonly found to be regulated by MYC in various types of cancer. This suggests that MYC-regulated lncRNAs could have a critical role in MYC function. For example, MYCLo-1 and MYCLo-3 are regulated by MYC not only in B cell but also in various types of cancer, suggesting their critical role in MYC-driven cancer [13, 20]. Indeed, those MYC-regulated lncRNAs are involved in MYC-mediated cell cycle and tumorigenesis [13].

Here, we identify and report MYC-repressed lncRNAs that are also implicated in MYC-function by using the data of lncRNA microarray. To identify MYC-induced lncRNAs in our previous study, we compared 3 groups: lncRNAs upregulated in CRC cells and tissues with high MYC expression, lncRNAs downregulated by MYC knockdown in CRC cells such as HCT116 and RKO [13]. In this study, to identify MYC-repressed lncRNAs, we compared lncRNAs downregulated in CRC with high MYC expression, lncRNAs upregulated by MYC knockdown in the two different cell lines. As a result, we identified 3 lncRNAs named MYCLo-4, -5 and -6. We show that these MYC-repressed lncRNAs inhibit cell proliferation and that MYC induces cell proliferation by repressing these lncRNAs in cancer cells. Profiling of cell cycle-related genes regulated by the lncRNAs indicates that the MYC-repressed lncRNAs induce the expression of various cell cycle-related genes including GADD45A followed by cell cycle arrest. These results show the importance of MYC-repressed lncRNAs in the regulation of MYC downstream genes and MYC functions.

RESULTS

Identification of lncRNAs repressed by MYC

Recently, we identified lncRNAs dysregulated by MYC [13]. By profiling lncRNA expression in CRC, we found that about 7% of lncRNAs are dysregulated in CRC and that 1060 lncRNAs are downregulated in CRC (Figure 1a) [13]. Because MYC is overexpressed in the CRC cells and tissues used in the previous study, a part of the lncRNAs could be repressed by MYC. To further verify the repression of the lncRNAs by MYC, we also identified lncRNAs upregulated by MYC knockdown in HCT116 (Figure 1b) and RKO (Figure 1c) [13]. The comparison of the 3 categories shows 2 lncRNAs commonly found in the all 3 categories, namely AK098037 and LPP-AS2 (Figure 1d).

Figure 1. Identification of MYC-repressed lncRNAs.

Figure 1

a. Heatmap of lncRNAs dysregulated in CRC. LncRNAs downregulated in CRC with high MYC expression are highlighted with a red-colored box. b. and c. Heatmaps of lncRNAs dysregulated by MYC knockdown in HCT116 (b) or RKO (c). LncRNAs upregulated by MYC knockdown are highlighted with a red-colored box. d. Venn diagrams showing the number of downregulated lncRNAs in a MYC-dependent manner. e–g. 5′ (left lane) and 3′ (right lane) RACE and amplification of internal region (middle lane) covering the both starting points of 5′ and 3′ RACE. Black arrows indicate appropriate 5′ and 3′ RACE products and white arrows indicate PCR products of the internal region. The bands were confirmed by direct sequencing. The arrows circled in red indicate PCR products of the sequence deposited in GenBank. h. and i. Schematics of MYCLo structures and genomic localizations.

As shown in our previous lncRNA identification, predicted sequences of lncRNAs differ frequently with the actual sequences [13, 16]. Using rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), we investigated the actual sequences of those lncRNAs (Figure 1e–1g). As shown, the 2 lncRNAs are shorter than the predicted sequences. In addition, we found that LPP-AS2 is expressed as 2 different lncRNAs (Figure 1f & 1g). Here we call these MYC-repressed lncRNAs, MYCLo-4 (AK098037, chromosome 9), MYCLo-5 (LPP-AS2–1, chromosome 3) and MYCLo-6 (LPP-AS2–2, chromosome 3) (Figure 1h & 1i). We also confirmed the expression of the lncRNAs by using Northern blot (Figure S1). Of the lncRNAs, MYCLo-5 is expressed as two variants, MYCLo-5 v1 and MYCLo-5 v2 (Figure 1i).

Validation of MYC-mediated repression of MYCLo-4∼6 in various cancer types

MYC is frequently amplified and/or overexpressed in various types of cancer. By using Taqman assay, we tested the repression of MYCLo-4∼6 by MYC in various cancer types. Of the tested cell lines, MYCLo-4 was upregulated by MYC knockdown in HCT116 (CRC), RKO (CRC), HT29 (colorectal adenocarcinoma), A549 (Lung carcinoma) and PC3 (prostate cancer) (Figure 2a). The other 2 lncRNAs, MYCLo-5 and -6 were also induced by MYC repression in various cancer types such as CRC (HCT116, RKO and HT29), lung cancer (A549), prostate cancer (PC3), breast cancer (MCF7 and SKBR3) and hepatocellular carcinoma (SK-HEP-1 and HepG2) (Figure 2b & 2c). These results indicate that MYCLo-4∼6 are common targets of MYC not only in CRC but also in other types of cancer.

Figure 2. Confirmation of MYC-mediated regulations of MYC-repressed MYCLos in various cancers.

Figure 2

a–c. qRT PCR results showing MYC-mediated negative regulation of MYCLo-4 (a), -5 (b) and -6 (c) in various types of cancer cells. Data are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments and each measured in triplicate (**, p < 0.05; *, p = < 0.01).

Identification and characterization of promoters of MYCLo-4∼6

MYC is a transcription factor that directly interacts with target gene promoters, leading to the enhancement of target gene expression [2, 3]. However, large number of MYC-targeted genes and noncoding RNAs are also repressed by direct or indirect targeting by MYC [2, 3, 13]. To scrutinize the regulatory mechanism of MYCL-4∼6 by MYC, we analyzed the ENCODE database [22]. Using the database of H3KMe1 mark, H3KMe3 mark and H3K27Ac mark, we identified 5′ upstream regions of MYCLo-4∼6 that show promoter and regulatory activities (Figure 3a & 3b). The ENCODE transcription factor ChIP-seq database also shows that various transcription factors interact with the promoter regions of MYCLo-4∼6. In the promoter of MYCLo-4, MYC is not shown to bind, supporting indirect repression of MYCLo-4 transcription by MYC (Figure 3a). In the database, several transcription factors such as MAFK, CTCF, SMC3 and RAD21 are shown to interact with the promoter of MYCLo-4. On the other hand, it is shown that MYC binds to the promoter of MYCLo-5 and -6, suggesting direct regulation of MYCLo-5/6 by MYC. However, MYC binding is only seen in a few cell lines in the database although we show MYC-mediated repression of MYCLo-5/6 in various cancer cell lines (Figure 2a–2c). These also indicate the possibility of indirect repression of MYCL-5∼6 by MYC. Indeed, numerous transcription factors interact with the promoter of MYCL-5/6 in the database (Figure 3b).

Figure 3. Identification and characterization of promoters of MYC-repressed MYCLos.

Figure 3

a. and b. ENCODE database showing promoter and regulatory activity markers such as H3K4Me1, H3K4Me3 and H3K27Ac, and ChIP-seq database showing transcription factors that bind to the promoters of MYC-repressed MYCLos.

MYC-repressed MYCLos prohibit MYC-enhanced cell proliferation through cell cycle regulation

To investigate the function of MYC-repressed MYCLos, we examined the effect of knockdown of the MYCLos in cell proliferation. The knockdown of MYC by MYC siRNA decreased cell proliferation, however, simultaneous knockdown of MYC and MYC-repressed MYCLos partially rescues the inhibition of cell proliferation caused by MYC knockdown in PC3 and RKO cells (Figure 4a & 4b). In addition, exogenous expression of MYC-repressed MYCLos also inhibited cell proliferation in HCT116 cells (Figure 4c, Figure S2). These results indicate that the induction of MYC-repressed MYCLos led by MYC knockdown is implicated in decreased cell proliferation caused by MYC knockdown.

Figure 4. MYC-repressed MYCLos inhibit cell proliferation through cell cycle regulation in a MYC-dependent manner.

Figure 4

a. and b. Cell proliferation assays. PC3 (a, n = 4), RKO (b, n = 4) cells were treated with siRNAs (25nM+25nM) as indicated and subjected to proliferation assay every 24 hr. Data are mean ± S.D. of four independent experiments (*, p = < 0.01). c. Cell proliferation assay. HCT116 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.3 plasmids expressing MYCLo-5 or -6 and subjected to a cell proliferation assay every 24 hr (n = 3). Data are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (*, p = < 0.01). d. Relative cell number in each cell-cycle phase determined by flow cytometry analysis. PC3 cells were treated with siRNAs (25nM+25nM) as indicated and analyzed 48 hr after transfection. Data are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments (**, p < 0.05; *, p = < 0.01).

MYC induces cancer cell proliferation through cell cycle regulation [4]. Likewise, knockdown of the MYC-repressed MYCLos alters the cell cycle. Flow cytometry analysis shows that repression of MYCLo-4 or -6 induced by MYC knockdown suppresses G2 arrest and that inhibition of MYCLo-5 induced by MYC knockdown increases the cell population in S phase (Figure 4d). These results suggest that MYC involves the MYC-repressed MYCLos in cell cycle regulation.

MYC-repressed lncRNAs participate in regulation of MYC target genes including GADD45A

To identify the cell cycle regulators modulated by the MYC-repressed MYCLo-4, -5 and -6, we profiled the expression of 183 cell cycle regulator genes using the nCounter Virtual Cell Cycle Gene Set from NanoString Technologies (Materials and Methods). We identified 32 genes, 17 genes and 52 genes significantly dysregulated by knockdown of MYCL-4, -5 or -6, respectively (more than 1.5 fold change, p-value < 0.05) (Figure 5a–5c, Table S1S3). Most of the dysregulated genes among the 183 cell cycle regulators are repressed by knockdown of the MYC-repressed MYCLos, suggesting that MYC-repressed lncRNAs modulate the cell cycle by enhancing the expression of cell cycle-related genes. By comparing the genes regulated by MYC (Figure 5d, Table S4), we further identified subsets of genes commonly regulated by MYC and the MYCLos under our selection criteria (more than 1.5 fold change, p-value < 0.05), as indicated in Figure 5a–5c.

Figure 5. Profiling of cell cycle-related genes regulated by MYC-repressed MYCLos.

Figure 5

a–c. Heatmaps representing cell cycle-related genes dysregulated by MYCLo-4 (a), -5 (b) and -6 (c) in PC3 cells. The genes that are oppositely regulated by MYC and MYC-repressed lncRNAs are indicated. Expression values displayed in gradient of red and blue are Log2-transformed fold change. The list of the dysregulated genes by MYC knockdown is available in Tables S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c). d. Heatmaps representing cell cycle-related genes dysregulated by MYC in PC3 cells. MYC downregulation by siMYC is indicated. Expression values displayed in gradient of red and blue are Log2-transformed fold change. The list of the dysregulated genes by MYC knockdown is available in Table S4. e. and f. qRT-PCR results showing MYC-independent regulation of GADD45A by MYCLo-4 (e) or -6 (f) knockdown. CCD-18Co cells were treated with 50nM siRNAs targeting MYCLo-4 for 72 hr. Data are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments and each measured in triplicate (**, p < 0.05; *, p = < 0.01). g. qRT-PCR results showing that MYC-repressed GADD45A expression is dependent on MYCLo-4 and -6. PC3 cells were treated with the indicated siRNAs (50 nM) for 72 hr. Data are mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments and each measured in triplicate (**, p < 0.05; *, p = < 0.01).

The critical regulator of G2 arrest, GADD45A is known to be repressed by MYC expression [23]. Interestingly, the results of the NanoString Gene Expression Assay show that the knockdown of MYCLo-4 suppresses GADD45A expression (Figure 5a). Although GADD45A is not indicated in Figure 5c due to our selection criteria (more than 1.5 fold change, p-value < 0.05), data analysis shows that knockdown of MYCLo-6 also induces GADD45A expression (about 1.4 fold change, p-value < 0.05). We verified by qRT-PCR the reduction of the GADD45A mRNA level by MYCLo-4 knockdown using MYCLo-4 siRNA-2 (Figure 5e). On the other hand, nonfunctional MYCLo-4 siRNA-1 did not repress the GADD45A expression level. Additionally, we verified the repression of GADD45A expression by knockdown of MYCLo-6 using qRT-PCR (Figure 5f). Consistent with the data of the NanoString Gene Expression Assay, however, MYCLo-5 knockdown showed no inhibitory effect in GADD45A expression (Figure S3). These results show the role of the MYCLo-4 and -6 in MYC-mediated GADD45A suppression. To further verify the involvement of the MYCLos in the MYC-mediated repression of GADD45A expression, we examined the expression of GADD45A altered by single knockdown of MYC or simultaneous knockdown of MYC and each MYCLo-4/6. The GADD45A expression induced by MYC knockdown is significantly repressed by knockdown of MYCLo-4 or -6 (Figure 5g, Figure S4). The results strongly support that MYCLo-4 and -6 are important mediators in MYC-mediated GADD45A repression.

DISCUSSION

In addition to MYC-induced lncRNAs such as MYCLo-1∼3, we identified different MYCLo family members, MYC-repressed MYCLo-4∼6. The proto-oncogene MYC, frequently overexpressed in various cancers, has a key role in tumor cell cycle regulation and tumor pathogenesis [4, 5, 8]. As we recently showed, the MYC-induced MYCLos are involved in MYC functions including cell cycle regulation and tumorigenesis. Likewise, the MYC-repressed MYCLos are also implicated in MYC-mediated cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation. And MYC-repressed MYCLos as well as MYC-induced MYCLos are also regulated by MYC in various cancer types [13, 20, 21]. Taken together, these results emphasize the critical role of MYC-regulated lncRNAs in MYC function and MYC-mediated regulation of the MYCLos in wide range of cancer types.

More than one third of MYC target genes are repressed by MYC although the transcription factor MYC is a universal amplifier of global gene expression [2, 3]. Many studies have shown the mechanisms of MYC-mediated repression of target genes through the interaction with initiator element, C/EBP, AP2 or Miz-1 [2428]. And findings of MYC-regulated microRNAs enabled to elucidate an additional mechanism of MYC-mediated target gene repression through small noncoding RNAs [2931]. A recent study also implicated long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the mechanism of repression of MYC target genes, showing that MYC-induced lncRNAs suppress MYC-repressed target genes [13]. Here, we show that MYC-repressed lncRNAs also regulate MYC-repressed target genes by enhancing their expression (Figure 6). This finding provides an extension of our understanding of MYC-regulated lncRNAs in MYC function.

Figure 6. Functional mechanisms of MYC-regulated lncRNAs in MYC functions.

Figure 6

Recently we showed that MYC-induced lncRNAs such as MYCLo-1 and -2 regulate the transcription of known MYC-repressed target genes such as CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN2B (p15) [13]. The two genes produce critical cell cycle regulators in G1 arrest [32, 33]. Another MYC-repressed target, GADD45A is known as a regulator of G2 cell cycle arrest [34]. Here, we show that MYC-repressed lncRNAs such as MYCLo-4 and -6 are involved in the regulation of GADD45A, the MYC-repressed target gene. The MYC-induced MYCLos repress the expression of CDKN1A and CDKN2B. On the contrary, the MYC-repressed MYCLos regulates the MYC-repressed target gene, GADD45A by inducing the expression. Furthermore, our results from cell cycle-related genes profiling show that most genes regulated by the MYC-repressed MYCLos are repressed by inhibition of the MYCLos suggesting the enhancer-like function of the MYC-repressed MYCLos. Our results show a different mode of lncRNA-mediated MYC function. Further studies are required in order to understand the MYC-mediated regulatory mechanisms of MYC-repressed MYCLos and the role of the MYCLos in MYC function.

Some transcription factors such as MYC and p53 have a critical role in cancer development by regulating transcription of numerous genes. For the last decade, it has been revealed that those transcription factors are responsible for the regulation of not only protein coding genes but also noncoding RNAs, and the importance of the noncoding RNAs has been elucidated [29, 31, 3537]. MYC-regulated lncRNAs were recently highlighted, compared to other noncoding RNAs regulated by cancer-associated transcription factors [13, 20, 21]. In this study, we identify MYC-repressed lncRNAs and characterize their function in the MYC pathway. Together with the previous findings of MYC-regulated lncRNAs, our results show that MYC tunes its oncogenic function by inducing oncogenic lncRNAs and repressing tumor-suppressor lncRNAs (Figure 6).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NanoString nCounter gene expression assay and data analysis

NanoString Technologies' nCounter Virtual Cell Cycle Gene Set was used following manufacturer's instructions (NanoString Technologies). Briefly, total RNA (100ng) was used as input for nCounter mRNA sample preparation reactions. All sample preparation was performed according to manufacturer's instructions (NanoString Technologies). Hybridization reactions were performed according to manufacturer's instructions with 5 μl of the 5-fold diluted sample preparation reaction. All hybridization reactions were incubated at 65°C for a minimum of 16 hrs. Hybridized probes were purified and counted on the nCounter Prep Station and Digital Analyzer (NanoString Technologies) following the manufacturer's instructions. For each assay, a high-density scan (600 fields of view) was performed. Data analysis was performed using the nSolver analysis software (NanoString Technologies) and dChip software.

Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)

5′ and 3′ RACE were performed using the SMARTer RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech). All procedures were done in accordance with manufacturer's instruction. Total RNA from HT29 or SW620 was used. PCR of the internal region was performed when starting points of 5′ and 3′ RACE had an unamplified gap. All primers used for RACE are presented in Table S5.

Cells, oligonucleotides and transfection

All cell lines were cultured as recommended by the ATCC. All custom siRNAs were designed by the Dharmacon custom siRNA design tool based on sequence information identified by RACE. For each MYCLo, 2 kinds of custom siRNAs were designed and used. All sequence information of the siRNAs is shown in Table S6. Cells were transfected with Lipofectamine RNAiMAx (Invitrogen) for oligonucleotides and Lipofectamine LTX for plasmids in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. In all transfection experiments, 50nM siRNA was used.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was prepared from cells using TRIZOL (Invitrogen) in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was subjected to quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). RNA levels were analyzed using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays, in accordance with manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). All RT reactions, including no-template controls and RT minus controls, were run in a GeneAmp PCR 9700 Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems). RNA concentrations were determined with a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific). Samples were normalized to GAPDH or OAZ1 for mRNAs and lncRNAs (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression levels were quantified using the 7900 HT Fast Realt-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Comparative real-time PCR was performed in triplicate, including no-template controls. Relative expression was calculated using the comparative Ct method. Probes used for Taqman Assays are shown in Table S6.

Cell proliferation assay

For cell proliferation assay, the MTS assay from Promega (CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay) was used following manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, cells in 96-wells plate were incubated for 72 hr in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere after transfection with indicated siRNAs, followed by addition of 20μl CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution and 1–4 hr incubation in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The absorbance at 490nm was recorded.

Flow cytometry analysis

For DNA content analysis, cells were fixed in methanol at −20° C, washed again, rehydrated, re-suspended in PBS containing 2 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) and 5 μg/ml RNase A, and analyzed by BD FACS Calibur Flow Cytometer.

Statistics

All graph values represent means ± S.D. from three independent experiments with each measured in triplicate. The differences between two groups were analyzed with unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and indicated with asterisks as described in figure legends.

SUPPLEMENTAY FIGURES AND TABLES

Acknowledgments

T.K. and C.M.C. contributed to project coordination and preparation of the manuscript. T.K. conceived the idea and designed the project. T.K. identified and registered MYCLos. T.K., R.C. and Y.J.J. performed experiments and data interpretation. P.F. and H.A. provided qRT-PCR and NanoString Gene Expression assays data.

This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (EDRN U01 CA152758).

Footnotes

Accession numbers

The Primary data of NanoString gene expression analysis are deposited in the GEO under accession number GSE39077 (GSM953006GSM953008, GSM955335GSM955346). Sequence information of MYCLos is available in GenBank (Accession number: MYCLo-4, JX046912; MYCLo-5 v1, JX046913; MYCLo-5 v2, JX046914; MYCLo-6, JX046915).

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blackwood EM, Eisenman RN. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science. 1991;251:1211–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.2006410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lin CY, Loven J, Rahl PB, Paranal RM, Burge CB, Bradner JE, Lee TI, Young RA. Transcriptional Amplification in Tumor Cells with Elevated c-Myc. Cell. 2012;151:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nie Z, Hu G, Wei G, Cui K, Yamane A, Resch W, Wang R, Green DR, Tessarollo L, Casellas R, Zhao K, Levens D. c-Myc Is a Universal Amplifier of Expressed Genes in Lymphocytes and Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell. 2012;151:68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Meyer N, Penn LZ. Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:976–990. doi: 10.1038/nrc2231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dang CV. MYC on the Path to Cancer. Cell. 2012;149:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hofmann JW, Zhao X, De Cecco M, Peterson AL, Pagliaroli L, Manivannan J, Hubbard GB, Ikeno Y, Zhang Y, Feng B, Li X, Serre T, Qi W, Van Remmen H, Miller RA, Bath KG, et al. Reduced Expression of MYC Increases Longevity and Enhances Healthspan. Cell. 2015;160:477–488. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ferrer I, Blanco R. N-myc and c-myc expression in Alzheimer disease, Huntington disease and Parkinson disease. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2000;77:270–276. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00062-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dalla-Favera R, Bregni M, Erikson J, Patterson D, Gallo RC, Croce CM. Human c-myc onc gene is located on the region of chromosome 8 that is translocated in Burkitt lymphoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:7824–7827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.24.7824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shi J, Vogt PK. Posttranslational regulation of Myc by promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1558–1565. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tseng YY, Moriarity BS, Gong W, Akiyama R, Tiwari A, Kawakami H, Ronning P, Reuland B, Guenther K, Beadnell TC, Essig J, Otto GM, O'Sullivan MG, Largaespada DA, Schwertfeger KL, Marahrens Y, et al. PVT1 dependence in cancer with MYC copy-number increase. Nature. 512:82–86. doi: 10.1038/nature13311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geisler S, Coller J. RNA in unexpected places: long non-coding RNA functions in diverse cellular contexts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:699–712. doi: 10.1038/nrm3679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wahlestedt C. Targeting long non-coding RNA to therapeutically upregulate gene expression. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:433–446. doi: 10.1038/nrd4018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim T, Jeon YJ, Cui R, Lee JH, Peng Y, Kim SH, Tili E, Alder H, Croce CM. Role of MYC-Regulated Long Noncoding RNAs in Cell Cycle Regulation and Tumorigenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107 doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nissan A, Stojadinovic A, Mitrani-Rosenbaum S, Halle D, Grinbaum R, Roistacher M, Bochem A, Dayanc BE, Ritter G, Gomceli I, Bostanci EB, Akoglu M, Chen YT, Old LJ, Gure AO. Colon cancer associated transcript-1: a novel RNA expressed in malignant and pre-malignant human tissues. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:1598–1606. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ling H, Spizzo R, Atlasi Y, Nicoloso M, Shimizu M, Redis RS, Nishida N, Gafa R, Song J, Guo Z, Ivan C, Barbarotto E, De Vries I, Zhang X, Ferracin M, Churchman M, et al. CCAT2, a novel noncoding RNA mapping to 8q24, underlies metastatic progression and chromosomal instability in colon cancer. Genome Res. 2013;23:1446–1461. doi: 10.1101/gr.152942.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim T, Cui R, Jeon YJ, Lee JH, Sim H, Park JK, Fadda P, Tili E, Nakanishi H, Huh MI, Kim SH, Cho JH, Sung BH, Peng Y, Lee TJ, Luo Z, et al. Long-range interaction and correlation between MYC enhancer and oncogenic long noncoding RNA CARLo-5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:4173–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400350111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prensner JR, Iyer MK, Balbin OA, Dhanasekaran SM, Cao Q, Brenner JC, Laxman B, Asangani IA, Grasso CS, Kominsky HD, Cao X, Jing X, Wang X, Siddiqui J, Wei JT, Robinson D, et al. Transcriptome sequencing across a prostate cancer cohort identifies PCAT-1, an unannotated lincRNA implicated in disease progression. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:742–749. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai MC, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL, Wang Y, Brzoska P, Kong B, Li R, West RB, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071–1076. doi: 10.1038/nature08975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xing Z, Lin A, Li C, Liang K, Wang S, Liu Y, Park PK, Qin L, Wei Y, Hawke DH, Hung MC, Lin C, Yang L. lncRNA directs cooperative epigenetic regulation downstream of chemokine signals. Cell. 2014;159:1110–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hart JR, Roberts TC, Weinberg MS, Morris KV, Vogt PK. MYC regulates the non-coding transcriptome. Oncotarget. 2015;5:12543–12554. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Winkle M, van den Berg A, Tayari M, Sietzema J, Terpstra M, Kortman G, de Jong D, Visser L, Diepstra A, Kok K, Kluiver J. Long noncoding RNAs as a novel component of the Myc transcriptional network. FASEB J. 2015 doi: 10.1096/fj.14-263889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.ENCODE An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marhin WW, Chen S, Facchini LM, Fornace AJ, Jr, Penn LZ. Myc represses the growth arrest gene gadd45. Oncogene. 1997;14:2825–2834. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li LH, Nerlov C, Prendergast G, MacGregor D, Ziff EB. c-Myc represses transcription in vivo by a novel mechanism dependent on the initiator element and Myc box II. EMBO J. 1994;13:4070–4079. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06724.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mink S, Mutschler B, Weiskirchen R, Bister K, Klempnauer KH. A novel function for Myc: inhibition of C/EBP-dependent gene activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:6635–6640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gaubatz S, Imhof A, Dosch R, Werner O, Mitchell P, Buettner R, Eilers M. Transcriptional activation by Myc is under negative control by the transcription factor AP-2. EMBO J. 1995;14:1508–1519. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07137.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Staller P, Peukert K, Kiermaier A, Seoane J, Lukas J, Karsunky H, Moroy T, Bartek J, Massague J, Hanel F, Eilers M. Repression of p15INK4b expression by Myc through association with Miz-1. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:392–399. doi: 10.1038/35070076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Seoane J, Le HV, Massague J. Myc suppression of the p21(Cip1) Cdk inhibitor influences the outcome of the p53 response to DNA damage. Nature. 2002;419:729–734. doi: 10.1038/nature01119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chang TC, Yu D, Lee YS, Wentzel EA, Arking DE, West KM, Dang CV, Thomas-Tikhonenko A, Mendell JT. Widespread microRNA repression by Myc contributes to tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 2008;40:43–50. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rinaldi A, Poretti G, Kwee I, Zucca E, Catapano CV, Tibiletti MG, Bertoni F. Concomitant MYC and microRNA cluster miR-17–92 (C13orf25) amplification in human mantle cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48:410–412. doi: 10.1080/10428190601059738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dews M, Homayouni A, Yu D, Murphy D, Sevignani C, Wentzel E, Furth EE, Lee WM, Enders GH, Mendell JT, Thomas-Tikhonenko A. Augmentation of tumor angiogenesis by a Myc-activated microRNA cluster. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1060–1065. doi: 10.1038/ng1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.el-Deiry WS, Harper JW, O'Connor PM, Velculescu VE, Canman CE, Jackman J, Pietenpol JA, Burrell M, Hill DE, Wang Y, et al. WAF1/CIP1 is induced in p53-mediated G1 arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:1169–1174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reynisdottir I, Polyak K, Iavarone A, Massague J. Kip/Cip and Ink4 Cdk inhibitors cooperate to induce cell cycle arrest in response to TGF-beta. Genes Dev. 1995;9:1831–1845. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.15.1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yang Q, Manicone A, Coursen JD, Linke SP, Nagashima M, Forgues M, Wang XW. Identification of a functional domain in a GADD45-mediated G2/M checkpoint. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36892–36898. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005319200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.He L, He X, Lim LP, de Stanchina E, Xuan Z, Liang Y, Xue W, Zender L, Magnus J, Ridzon D, Jackson AL, Linsley PS, Chen C, Lowe SW, Cleary MA, Hannon GJ. A microRNA component of the p53 tumour suppressor network. Nature. 2007;447:1130–1134. doi: 10.1038/nature05939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim T, Veronese A, Pichiorri F, Lee TJ, Jeon YJ, Volinia S, Pineau P, Marchio A, Palatini J, Suh SS, Alder H, Liu CG, Dejean A, Croce CM. p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition through microRNAs targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Exp Med. 2011;208:875–883. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Huarte M, Guttman M, Feldser D, Garber M, Koziol MJ, Kenzelmann-Broz D, Khalil AM, Zuk O, Amit I, Rabani M, Attardi LD, Regev A, Lander ES, Jacks T, Rinn JL. A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell. 2010;142:409–419. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES