Skip to main content
AoB Plants logoLink to AoB Plants
. 2015 Oct 19;7:plv117. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv117

Genetic diversity and population structure of an important wild berry crop

Laura Zoratti 1,*,, Luisa Palmieri 2,, Laura Jaakola 3,4, Hely Häggman 1
PMCID: PMC4662731  PMID: 26483325

Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) fruits are perceived by consumers to be a health-promoting food, conferred by their high content of phenolic compounds and carotenoids. The health properties of these molecules have raised commercial interest in these berries globally, and caught the attention of breeders. Bilberry is a wild crop and represents an important source of genetic variability for blueberry breeding. Our study presents information related to the genetic diversity and structure of bilberry populations derived from Northern Europe, providing new knowledge for the development of genetic studies and for breeding purposes.

Keywords: Bilberry, genetic diversity, germplasm, ISSR, population structure, Vaccinium myrtillus

Abstract

The success of plant breeding in the coming years will be associated with access to new sources of variation, which will include landraces and wild relatives of crop species. In order to access the reservoir of favourable alleles within wild germplasm, knowledge about the genetic diversity and the population structure of wild species is needed. Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) is one of the most important wild crops growing in the forests of Northern European countries, noted for its nutritional properties and its beneficial effects on human health. Assessment of the genetic diversity of wild bilberry germplasm is needed for efforts such as in situ conservation, on-farm management and development of plant breeding programmes. However, to date, only a few local (small-scale) genetic studies of this species have been performed. We therefore conducted a study of genetic variability within 32 individual samples collected from different locations in Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Germany, and analysed genetic diversity among geographic groups. Four selected inter-simple sequence repeat primers allowed the amplification of 127 polymorphic loci which, based on analysis of variance, made it possible to identify 85 % of the genetic diversity within studied bilberry populations, being in agreement with the mixed-mating system of bilberry. Significant correlations were obtained between geographic and genetic distances for the entire set of samples. The analyses also highlighted the presence of a north–south genetic gradient, which is in accordance with recent findings on phenotypic traits of bilberry.

Introduction

The success of plant breeding over the past century has been associated with a narrowing of the available genetic diversity within elite germplasm of species. New sources of variation include landraces and wild relatives of crop species, and although exploiting wild relatives as a source of novel alleles is challenging, it has provided notable successes in crop improvement (Tester and Langridge 2010). Most crop geneticists agree that the enrichment of the cultivated gene pool will be necessary to meet the challenges that lie ahead associated with global environmental changes (Feuillet et al. 2008). However, many advances are still needed to access the extensive reservoir of favourable alleles within wild germplasm. These include increasing our understanding of the molecular basis for key traits and expanding existing phenotyping and genotyping of germplasm collections (Feuillet et al. 2008). Therefore, knowledge of the genetic diversity and the population structure of wild species is crucial for their management as well as conservation (Burdon and Wilcox 2007; Zhao et al. 2014).

Vaccinium is a genus of ∼450 plant species in the family Ericaceae that are widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere and also in the mountains of tropical Asia and Central and South America (Song and Hancock 2011). The species within this genus present different levels of ploidy (2x, 4x and 6x; x = 12), which results in evident morphological differences. Regarding domestication and commercial fruit crop production, the most important species are V. corymbosum (highbush blueberry), V. virgatum (rabbit-eye blueberry), V. angustifolium (lowbush blueberry), V. macrocarpon (cranberry) and V. vitis-idaea (lingonberry). The genus also contains the wild V. myrtillus (bilberry) and a number of other currently non-cultivated Vaccinium species that show great potential as new berry crops (Song and Hancock 2011). Bilberry belongs to the section Myrtillus, and it is a diploid species (2n = 2x = 24; Song and Hancock 2011). The plant is a deciduous woody dwarf shrub, and it grows typically in pine and spruce heath forests and old peat bogs in Europe, North America, Greenland and northern parts of Asia, including Japan and Greenland (Nestby et al. 2011). Bilberry reproduces clonally through rhizomes and also sexually, with an outcrossing rate ranging from 0.66 to 0.75, and it is therefore considered to belong to the group of mixed-mating species (Jacquemart 1993).

Bilberry is an important wild fruit crop, especially in Northern and Eastern European countries, where the berries are picked from the wild and are either sold on the fresh market or frozen for use in food industries to make jams, juices and flavourings. The fruits are also important to the pharmaceutical industry, as they are naturally rich in polyphenols and other antioxidant compounds, which have potential beneficial effects on human health. These berries contain great amounts of flavonoids, in particular anthocyanins, which can reach up to 500 mg/100 g fresh weight (Lätti et al. 2008); they also produce carotenoids (Bunea et al. 2011) and lower amounts of ascorbic acid (Cocetta et al. 2012).

There is an increasing demand for these berries due to their high nutritional value (Martinussen et al. 2009), although they are still poorly exploited from a commercial point of view. Despite the fact that the average wild berry yield in Scandinavia has been estimated to be approximately 1 billion kg year−1, only ∼5–10 % of the annual crop is utilized for private or commercial consumption (Paassilta et al. 2009). Nestby et al. (2011) underlined the need for developing an improved production system, in which high yields of good-quality bilberries are produced at manageable costs. So far, cultivation of the species has been very limited and the berries used for commercial purposes are mainly harvested from forests. Therefore, development of forest management systems is considered a good option to achieve this purpose (Nestby et al. 2011). Forest management systems will initially require efforts to identify areas in which plants produce high yields and high-quality bilberries. Plants with high-quality characteristics can be identified by phytochemical content or phenotypic traits of interest (e.g. plant productivity, fruit antioxidant content and fruit shelf life) and by genotypic-based methods, whereby the detected molecular polymorphisms are correlated to phenotypic traits. The genotypic-based methods are generally effective, they only need a small amount of DNA (Tanya et al. 2011) and they are not affected by environmental factors or developmental stages of the plants. Inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) have shown to be good markers for assessing the genetic diversity of wild Vaccinium species from wide geographical areas of collection, in particular, lingonberry (V. vitis-idaea; Debnath 2007) and lowbush blueberry (V. angustifolium; Debnath 2009). Moreover, ISSR markers were able to detect more polymorphisms than random amplified polimorphic DNA in the same species (Debnath 2009). Therefore, ISSR markers were chosen for our study where the aims were to (i) test the applicability of ISSR markers on bilberry; (ii) determine genetic relationships and diversity among bilberry populations derived from biomes in Northern Europe and (iii) find markers to be used in conservation and management of bilberry in forests of Northern Europe.

Methods

Study sites and sampling

Thirty-two individual bilberry samples derived from different seeds collected at different latitudes in several Nordic countries were included in this study (Table 1, Fig. 1): Iceland (IS1, IS2), Norway (N2, N4, N7), Sweden (R), Finland (S, P, M, L) and Germany (K). The plants were established in 2003 from bilberry seeds harvested from a pool of ripe berries collected in an area of 10 × 10 m and micropropagated in vitro (Jaakola et al. 2001) at the Botanical Gardens of the University of Oulu (Finland). Plantlets were grown in growth rooms under controlled conditions (+22 °C under 16 h photoperiod, white fluorescent Osram 18 W, 1.8 W m−2).

Table 1.

Provenances of bilberry genotypes and genetic diversity parameters based on ISSR markers. Number of samples analysed (N), number of different alleles (Na), number of effective alleles (Ne), number of private bands (Np), percentage of polymorphic loci (P %), expected heterozygosity (He) and Shannon's Information index (I).

Provenance ID Country Latitude (°N) Longitude (°E) Altitude (m above sea level) Genotype ID N Na Ne Np P % He I
Kleifarveugr IS1 Iceland 66°07′ −18°38′ 178 IS1_a, IS1_3, IS1_4 3.000 0.646 1.158 2 24.40 0.092 0.137
Strandavegur IS2 Iceland 65°47′ −21°22′ 10 IS2_a, IS2_1, IS2_5 3.000 0.803 1.161 0 29.92 0.102 0.156
Storfjord N2 Norway 69°23′ 20°16′ 3 N2_2, N2_5, N2_6 3.000 0.661 1.142 0 23.62 0.086 0.129
Trondelag N4 Norway 63°32′ 10°53′ 420 N4, N4_3, N4_5 3.000 0.614 1.111 0 22.05 0.072 0.112
Storgata N7 Norway 60°54′ 10°44′ 173 N7. N7_5, N7_6 3.000 0.772 1.193 0 31.50 0.115 0.173
Kvikkjokk R Sweden 66°57′ 17°43′ 327 R1, R2, R3 3.000 0.693 1.182 2 25.98 0.103 0.151
Sodankylä S Finland 67°25′ 26°35′ 189 S1, S3 2.000 0.630 1.128 2 18.11 0.075 0.110
Muhos M Finland 64°48′ 25°59′ 39 M, M1, M5 3.000 0.835 1.198 2 34.65 0.122 0.184
Parkano P Finland 62°02′ 23°02′ 117 P, P_1, P_10 3.000 0.961 1.251 6 39.37 0.148 0.220
Lapinjärvi L Finland 60°37′ 26°11′ 21 L2, L3, L6 3.000 0.803 1.199 2 33.86 0.121 0.182
Kiel K Germany 54°20′ 10°08′ 14 K2, K6, K10 3.000 0.945 1.276 2 43.31 0.162 0.242

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of sampling sites in Northern Europe, including ID (according to Table 1). The pie chart represents rather average coefficients of membership resulting from the genetic structure analysis (best fit model, K = 7). Each colour represents a different gene pool. The barplot represents each accession as a single vertical bar broken into K colour segments, with lengths proportional to the estimate probability of membership in each inferred cluster. Spatial autocorrelation analysis results, and geographical distances of correlated populations, are reported on the left of the figure (ID, grey arrows and geographical distance in kilometres).

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from shoot tips of actively growing in vitro-cultured bilberry shoot tips, using the EZNA™ SP Plant DNA Mini Kit (Omega Bio-tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of DNA was estimated with the NanoDrop N-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) at 260 nm. Fifteen primers representing di-, tri-, tetra- and pentamer repeats, previously used to characterize other Vaccinium species (Debnath 2007), were considered for the study. Of these, UBC-825, UBC-857, UBC-873 and UBC-881, which gave clear banding patterns, were used for the final study (Table 2). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a final volume of 25 µL including 10 ng of DNA template, 1× Optimized DyNAzyme™ buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.1 % Triton X-100; Finnzyme, Espoo, Finland), 0.3 µM of each primer, 200 μM dNTPs, 0.8 U of DyNAzyme™ II DNA Polymerase (Finnzyme). The thermal profile consisted of 10 min at 94 °C, followed by 31 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 46.5 °C and 2 min at 72 °C and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR reaction was purified using sodium acetate–ethanol DNA precipitation. One microlitre of the purified sample was analysed on a capillary electrophoresis system, Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with DNA7500 kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each primer–clone sample combination was repeated at least two times and only replicated bands were included in the analyses. Fragments of similar size across individuals were assumed to be homologous.

Table 2.

Molecular ISSR primers used for bilberry genotypes' discrimination. Y = (C or T) in ISSR primer sequences; repeat motif and the data on DNA profile and polymorphism generated in 32 bilberry samples; total number of bands (NB), number of polymorphic bands (NPB), proportion of polymorphic bands (PPB), rank of molecular weights (RW); resolving power (Rp).

Primer name Sequence NB NPB PPB (%) RW (bp) Rp
UBC-825 (AC)8T 33 31 93.9 310–2100 8.625
UBC-857 (AC)8YG 37 37 100 80–6600 13.87
UBC-873 (GACA)4 25 25 100 80–2600 9.18
UBC-881 (GGGTG)3 32 32 100 60–1400 14.31

Data analysis

Genetic diversity

The amplification product sizes were scored using 2100 Expert Software (Agilent Technologies). The results were transformed into a binomial matrix as present (1) or absent (0) for each marker. Since the ISSR marker is dominant, we assumed that each band represented the single bi-allelic locus (Debnath 2007). Band patterns were analysed in order to determine the level of polymorphism (total number of bands), number of polymorphic bands, proportion of polymorphic bands and the resolving power (Rp) detected for each primer. Resolving power was calculated according to Prevost and Wilkinson (1999); this measure is based on the distribution of alleles among the genotypes and it estimates the discrimination capacity of each primer. Thus, the resolving power of a primer is defined as Rp = ∑Ib, where Ib (band informativeness) takes the value of 1 − [2 × |0.5 − p|] and p is the ratio of genotypes sharing the band. Moreover, the binomial matrix was used to produce the input matrix following GenAlex version 6.1 software manual instructions (Peakall and Smouse 2006) and analysed using the same software to estimate genetic diversity parameters, i.e. number of different bands, number of different bands with frequency ≥5 %, number of private bands, number of locally common bands frequency ≥5 % found in ≤25 and ≤50 % of populations, mean of expected heterozygosity (He) and the Shannon's Information Index (I) calculated as I = −1 × (p × ln(p) + q × ln(q)), where p and q are the estimated allele frequencies.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was used to partition the total genetic variance into ‘within-populations' or ‘among-populations’ levels. The software GenAlex was used to generate a matrix of pairwise genetic distances between individuals and to calculate the following variance components: degrees of freedom, sum of squares, mean sum of squares, estimated variance and conversion of estimated variances to percentage of total variance. The number of permutations for significance testing was set at 9999. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was done using Past software v. 2.17c (Hammer et al. 2001), to determine the relative importance of geographical factors in the spatial organization of genetic diversity among genotypes. This analysis, originally designed for relating species composition to different predictive variables (Ter Braak 1986), has been successfully used to describe the relationship between environmental variables and genetic composition (Angers et al. 1999; Girard and Angers 2006; Dell'Acqua et al. 2014). The analysis was performed using a geographical variables/genetic data matrix where longitude, latitude and altitude were used as geographic factors. Here, we consider individuals as sites, and alleles at outlier loci as objects. The first three input file columns contain geographical variables, following the CCA Past software v. 2.17c instructions.

Spatial genetic analysis

Spatial analysis was conducted using the genetic spatial autocorrelation (SA) (Smouse and Peakall 1999; Peakall et al. 2003) option in GenAlex version 6. The pairwise geographical distance matrices were calculated considering them as the crow flies distances in kilometres and were used with the previously obtained genetic distance matrices to generate an autocorrelation coefficient r for each distance class using two different options. The autocorrelation coefficient (r) is similar to Moran's I (Moran 1950) and ranged from −1 to 1. The significance level was tested by constructing a two-tailed 95 % confidence interval around the null hypothesis of no spatial genetic structure, which is r = 0. The autocorrelation analysis was performed using a multiple distance class simulation. Since the distance classes have to be small enough to capture the spatial pattern of interest, while large enough to include an adequate number of pairwise comparisons for statistical testing, we characterized the spatial genetic relationship kilometre intervals from 0 up to 2400. This allowed us to determine the strength of autocorrelation and to what extent the autocorrelation decays with increasing distance. To test the null hypothesis of no spatial structure, confidence limits were calculated using permutation and bootstrapping (999 interactions).

Directional autocorrelation analysis was carried out by testing for the direction of maximum genetic correlation using the bearing procedure implemented in PASSAGE version 2 (Rosenberg and Anderson 2011). The bearing method analysed the correlation coefficient (r) between geographical distance and genetic relatedness under fixed bearing angles (degrees north of due east). For each sector, r is calculated from each distance pair weighted by the cosine of its angle with respect to the angle of the centre arc of the respective sector. Geographical locations were imported with associated genetic data. PASSAGE calculates a distance matrix from genetic data and geographical co-ordinates and an angular matrix from geographical co-ordinates. The correlation was calculated for each 10° sector, from 0° to 180°, and the significance was estimated using 999 randomizations.

Grouping of bilberry individuals by STRUCTURE and Cluster analyses

The software STRUCTURE 2.3.3 (Pritchard et al. 2000; Falush et al. 2003), which, by means of iterative algorithms, identifies clusters of related individuals from multi-locus genotypes, was used to examine the genetic structure of populations. Ten independent runs of STRUCTURE were performed for each K value from 1 to 11. Each run consisted of a burn-in period of 100 000 steps, followed by 1 000 000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo replicates, assuming an admixture model and correlated allele frequencies. No prior information was used to define the clusters. The most likely K was chosen comparing the average estimates of the likelihood of the data, ln(Pr(X|K)), for each value of K (Pritchard et al. 2000), as well as calculating the ad hoc statistics ΔK, based on the rate of change in the ln probability of data between successive K values (Evanno et al. 2005). Furthermore, the Past 2.17c (Hammer et al. 2001) software was used to generate a matrix using the Dice similarity index. This matrix was used to construct a Ward's dendrogram tree.

Results

Genetic diversity

Polymerase chain reaction assays using four primers selected in the initial tests allowed 127 ISSR loci to be amplified from the DNA samples derived from 32 bilberry individuals. The detected loci ranged between 60 and 6600 bp (within the limits of the Agilent DNA7500 kit that allowed the detection of fragments between 50 and 7500 bp). The average number of loci per primer was 31.75, with the highest number of loci (n = 37) detected by the UBC-857 primer and the smallest number (n = 25) by the UBC-873 primer (Table 2). Of the 127 amplified loci, 126 (99.24 %) were polymorphic. The greatest discrimination power among samples was obtained with primer UBC-881 yielding an Rp value of 14.31, while the lowest Rp value of 8.62 was yielded with primer UBC-825. Except for the primer pair of UBC-825, other primers produced 100 % polymorphic bands (Table 2). The number of bands within populations ranged between 50 and 72, with a number of private bands that ranged between 0 and 6 and a mean expected heterozygosity value that ranged between 0.072 and 0.162. The highest percentage of polymorphic loci (P %) was established in Kiel individuals (43.31 %), while the lowest was observed in S individuals (18.11 %). Moreover, the mean number of different alleles over all loci (Na) for each population ranged between 0.614 and 0.961, the mean number of effective alleles (Ne) ranged between 1.111 and 1.276, and the Shannon's Information Index ranged between 0.110 and 0.242 (Table 1). Analysis of molecular variance indicated that 15 % of the total genetic variance was attributable to among-populations diversity and the rest (85 %) to within-populations diversity. The value of ΦPT (0.190 with a maximum of 0.795) indicated a great level of genetic differentiation among populations. We used a CCA to investigate the possible aggregation or differentiation of analysed genotypes. Results of the CCA (Fig. 2) revealed the strong influence of the geographical position on genotype aggregation (Axis 1 = 63.3 % of variance; Axis 2 = 35.7 %). The correlation biplot, which considers both the direction and the relative length of the vectors, underlines clustering for most of the individuals having the same origins. For instance, the clustering of Finnish individuals (P, L, M and one S sample, Fig. 1) occurred according to longitude, and the clustering of the same Finnish samples with Norwegian individuals derived from the closer latitudes (Fig. 1) was evident. The individuals from Norway (N4 and N7) overlapped and were in close proximity to Swedish individuals probably due to the same influence of all geographical variables on all these samples. IS1, IS2 and K individuals are clustering alone as previously shown, but IS1 and IS2 seem to be strongly influenced by negative longitude values while the K individuals seem to be most influenced by lower values of latitude.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Canonical correspondence analysis ordination biplot representing genotype aggregation and geographical variables (solid arrows). The CCA explained 64.3 and 35.7 % of the variation on the first two axes.

Spatial genetic structure

In the correlogram that resulted from SA analysis, the y-axis average SA coefficient, r, has a function of distance class on the x-axis. The maximum number of distance classes obtained using the even sample classes options was 52. It is apparent in Fig. 3 that there is a highly significant positive SA (the r value falls above or at the 95 % confidence interval, close to a correlation of zero) at distance classes 0–100 evidencing non-random spatial genetic structure within populations. Moreover, the positive correlation decreases until 600 km (r = 0.028). Figure 1 reports the IDs and the geographical distances of populations showing positive r values. The bearing analysis from PASSAGE indicated the strongest correlation occurred along a north–south axis (r = 0.856, P = 0.001), while the weakest occurred in the east–west direction (r = −0.188, P = 0).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Results of multiple SA analyses for increasing distance class sizes to determine SA. Confidence limits for the r values are indicated and were estimated by permutation (999 interactions). Upper (U) and lower (L) confidence limits were generated for the null hypothesis of no SA (r = 0) by bootstrap (999 interactions).

Clustering of bilberry individuals by STRUCTURE analysis

STRUCTURE analysis assigned genotypes into respective groups on the basis of their allele frequencies. According to the user-defined settings, the programme assumed that genotypes are admixed and the allele frequencies are correlated as a consequence of shared ancestry and/or migration. Bayesian cluster, based on an admixture model, presumes that each individual has inherited some proportion of its ancestry from each of the K genotypes (Pritchard et al. 2000). According to the Evanno's method, the STRUCTURE analysis indicated K = 7 as the most likely number of gene pools. These pools represented most geographical groups but with a substantially different proportion of membership (q) of each group in each gene pool. Considering the mean value for each geographical group of genotypes (Q), six different patterns of genetic makeup were evidenced. The first type of pattern included two Norwegian groups (N4 and N7) out of three with the highest Q in gene pool 7 (0.572 and 0.636, respectively). Finnish populations represented two distinct patterns with the highest Q value in gene pool 5 for L and M groups (0.508 and 0.420, respectively) and in gene pool 2 for P and S groups (0.411 and 0.295, respectively). The IS1 population had the maximum Q value in gene pool 4 (0.59) and the K group in gene pool 1. Finally, individuals from Iceland (IS2), Norway (N2) and Sweden (R) had similar Q values in gene pools 3, 6 and 7 (Fig. 1).

The Dice distances between pairs of populations were calculated based on the 127 analysed bands. The dendrogram was built using Ward's method (Fig. 4) and showed clusters comparable with clusters evidenced from the STRUCTURE analysis, except for P and R genotypes, which clustered alone as previously assessed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Dendogram of bilberry individuals using Ward's method. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values based on 10 000 replicates.

Discussion

Plant genetic resources are essential for sustainable agriculture and food security. One of the best ways to preserve them is in situ management, which becomes particularly important in cases of wild crop species such as bilberry. Molecular markers can provide important information regarding genetic polymorphism and essential knowledge for development and improvement of plant populations; however, to date only a few studies have been carried out on the assessment of bilberry germplasm genetic diversity (Raspé et al. 2004; Albert et al. 2008).

In our study, ISSR markers were used to evaluate genetic variation among 32 bilberry individuals located in Fennoscandia and Germany. Four primers detected significant genetic variation among the genotypes thanks to their high polymorphism level (99 %). A similar high level of diversity in the same genus (80.4 %) was reported in highbush and rabbit-eye blueberry (Garriga et al. 2013). The ability to discriminate bilberry samples varied between different ISSR primers, in agreement with the findings in lingonberry (Debnath 2007) and lowbush blueberry (Debnath 2009).

The high percentage value of genetic diversity within-population obtained from AMOVA can be explained as a natural selection mechanism to reduce fitness costs due to geitonogamous self-pollination in bilberry as previously reported by Albert et al. (2008). The same results were also found in other wild Vaccinium species such as lingonberry (Persson and Gustavsson 2001; Garkava-Gustavsson et al. 2005; Debnath 2007), bog bilberry (V. uliginosum; Eidesen et al. 2007) and wild lowbush blueberry (Debnath 2009). Moreover, the great genetic differentiation among geographically distant populations, determined from the positive value of ΦPT, is in accordance with the theory that the level of genetic heterogeneity among individuals is greater in species with geographically disjunctive populations than in species with more continuous distributions (Hamrick and Godt 1996; Premoli et al. 2001). Therefore, in the present study, we focussed on the genetic diversity of bilberry plants separated by long distances, clones of which are discontinuous and isolated from one another by mountains or seas. The effect of these natural barriers together with common results of different clusters and spatial and population structure analyses provided evidence of a great association between the Finnish and the Norwegian N2 populations on one side, the Norwegian populations N4 and N7 on the other side, and split IS and K populations from all the others. Moreover, the presence of a north–south genetic gradient is in accordance with recent findings on bilberry phenotypic traits (Lätti et al. 2008; Åkerström et al. 2010; Uleberg et al. 2012). These results are also supported by other studies carried out on different species that show how intra-specific genetic variation increases or decreases in relation to the physical distance separating the individuals, and is also showing the influence of the geographic structure of natural populations (Brooks et al. 2015). To date, most conservation activities have focussed on the species level; however, also genetic variation at an intra-specific level needs to be considered to avoid loss of diversity derived from severe inbreeding, resulting in lowered fitness and increasing risk of extinction. Moreover, the determination and the conservation of the within-population genetic diversity of one species could increase evolutionary resilience when different and geographically separated environments are connected. When populations are interconnected along climatic and geographical gradients, there is the potential for in situ adaptive evolution (Sgrò et al. 2011). Furthermore, plant species conserved in key biodiversity areas are an essential genetic source to develop new varieties for future breeding work and to avoid the diversity loss derived from severe inbreeding. Finally, genetic diversity conservation might become crucial in a biotic or abiotic crisis where only very rare genotypes may be resistant to a new disease, pathogen strain or environmental condition. This was further supported by the highest values for He, Shannon Index and number of polymorphic bands.

Further studies with a higher number of markers and samples from the distribution area of bilberry are needed to identify the key biodiversity areas of the species.

Conclusions

Advances in genotyping techniques combined with more sophisticated statistical methods provide the means by which among- and within-population genetic diversity can be estimated in the absence of any prior specific information. This valuation is necessary to conserve the biodiversity of specific areas. In this perspective, we assessed the intra- and inter-population genetic diversity of 32 individuals collected from different North European countries. We found the presence of significant correlations between geographic and genetic distances, which placed Norwegian, Finnish, Icelandic and German genotypes in separate groups. The present results indicate how key biodiversity areas of the wild V. myrtillus species could be individualized as a useful source of biodiversity for future ecological studies and breeding purposes.

Sources of Funding

The study was funded by the Thule Institute (2013–16) (to H.H.) and by Nordic Innovation Centre—New Nordic Food project ‘Bilberry: Towards functional food markets’ (2007–10) (to H.H. and L.J.).

Contributions by the Authors

L.Z. performed the DNA analyses and the ISSR data scoring and was involved in writing and editing; L.P. performed all the statistical analyses and was involved in writing and editing; L.J. and H.H. provided contribution to the concept and the design of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The partners of the New Nordic Food project are acknowledged for the bilberry seed samples from Iceland, Norway and Sweden. We thank Aaron Bergdahl for English revision of the manuscript.

Literature Cited

  1. Åkerström A, Jaakola L, Bång U, Jäderlund A. 2010. Effects of latitude-related factors and geographical origin on anthocyanidin concentrations in fruits of Vaccinium myrtillus L. (bilberries). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:11939–11945. 10.1021/jf102407n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albert T, Raspé O, Jacquemart A-L. 2008. Influence of clonal growth on selfing rate in Vaccinium myrtillus L. Plant Biology 10:643–649. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00067.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angers B, Magnan P, Plante M, Bernatchez L. 1999. Canonical correspondence analysis for estimating spatial and environmental effects on microsatellite gene diversity in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) . Molecular Ecology 8:1043–1053. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00669.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brooks TM, Cuttelod A, Faith DP, Garcia-Moreno J, Langhammer P, Pérez-Espona S. 2015. Why and how might genetic and phylogenetic diversity be reflected in the identification of key biodiversity areas? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370:20140019 10.1098/rstb.2014.0019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bunea A, Rugină DO, Pintea AM, Bunea CI, Socaciu C. 2011. Comparative polyphenolic content and antioxidant activities of some wild and cultivated blueberries from Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 39:70–76. [Google Scholar]
  6. Burdon RD, Wilcox PL. 2007. Population management: potential impacts of advances in genomics. New Forests 34:187–206. 10.1007/s11056-007-9047-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cocetta G, Karppinen K, Suokas M, Hohtola A, Häggman H, Spinardi A, Mignani I, Jaakola L. 2012. Ascorbic acid metabolism during bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) fruit development. Journal of Plant Physiology 169:1059–1065. 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Debnath SC. 2007. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) to assess genetic diversity within a collection of wild lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) clones. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 87:337–344. 10.4141/P06-059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Debnath SC. 2009. Development of ISSR markers for genetic diversity studies in Vaccinium angustifolium. Nordic Journal of Botany 27:141–148. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00402.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dell'acqua M, Fricano A, Gomarasca S, Caccianiga M, Piffanelli P, Bocchi S, Gianfranceschi L. 2014. Genome scan of Kenyan Themeda triandra populations by AFLP markers reveals a complex genetic structure and hints for ongoing environmental selection. South African Journal of Botany 92:28–38. 10.1016/j.sajb.2014.01.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eidesen PB, Alsos IG, Popp M, Stensrud Ø, Suda J, Brochmann C. 2007. Nuclear vs. plastid data: complex pleistocene history of a circumpolar key species. Molecular Ecology 16:3902–3925. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03425.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14:2611–2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feuillet C, Langridge P, Waugh R. 2008. Cereal breeding takes a walk on the wild side. Trends in Genetics 24:24–32. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Garkava-Gustavsson L, Persson HA, Nybom H, Rumpunen K, Gustavsson BA, Bartish I. 2005. RAPD-based analysis of genetic diversity and selection of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) material for ex situ conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52:723–735. 10.1007/s10722-003-6123-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Garriga M, Parra PA, Caligari PDS, Retamales JB, Carrasco BA, Lobos GA, García-Gonzáles R. 2013. Application of inter-simple sequence repeats relative to simple sequence repeats as a molecular marker system for indexing blueberry cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 93:913–921. 10.4141/cjps2013-057 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Girard P, Angers B. 2006. The impact of postglacial marine invasions on the genetic diversity of an obligate freshwater fish, the longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae), on the Quebec peninsula. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:1429–1438. 10.1139/f06-047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 351:1291–1298. 10.1098/rstb.1996.0112 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jaakola L, Tolvanen A, Laine K, Hohtola A. 2001. Effect of N6-isopentenyladenine concentration on growth initiation in vitro and rooting of bilberry and lingonberry microshoots. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 66:73–77. 10.1023/A:1010602726215 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacquemart AL. 1993. Floral visitors of Vaccinium species in the high Ardennes, Belgium. Flora 188:263–273. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lätti AK, Riihinen KR, Kainulainen PS. 2008. Analysis of anthocyanin variation in wild populations of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finland. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56:190–196. 10.1021/jf072857m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martinussen I, Rohloff J, Uleberg E, Junttila O, Hohtola A, Jaakola L, Häggman H. 2009. Climatic effects on the production and quality of bilberries (Vaccinium myrtillus). Latvian Journal of Agronomy 12:71–74. [Google Scholar]
  24. Moran PAP. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23. 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nestby R, Percival D, Martinussen I, Opstad N, Rohloff J. 2011. The European blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and the potential for cultivation. European Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 5:5–16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Paassilta M, Moisio S, Jaakola L, Häggman H. 2009. Voice of the Nordic wildberry industry. Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:288–295. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peakall R, Ruibal M, Lindenmayer DB. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution 57:1182–1195. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00327.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Persson HA, Gustavsson BA. 2001. The extent of clonality and genetic diversity in lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) revealed by RAPDs and leaf-shape analysis. Molecular Ecology 10:1385–1397. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01280.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Premoli AC, Souto CP, Allnutt TR, Newton AC. 2001. Effects of population disjunction on isozyme variation in the widespread Pilgerodendron uviferum. Heredity 87:337–343. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00906.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98:107–112. 10.1007/s001220051046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Raspé O, Guillaume P, Jacquemart AL. 2004. Inbreeding depression and biased paternity after mixed-pollination in Vaccinium myrtillus L. (Ericaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165:765–771. 10.1086/422045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD. 2011. PASSaGE: pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2:229–232. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00081.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann AA. 2011. Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evolutionary Applications 4:326–337. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smouse PE, Peakall R. 1999. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82:561–573. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Song GQ, Hancock F. 2011. Vaccinium. In: Kole C, ed. Wild crop relatives: genomic breeding resource. Temperate fruits. New York: Springer, 210–213. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tanya P, Taeprayoon P, Hadkam Y, Srinives P. 2011. Genetic diversity among Jatropha and Jatropha-related species based on ISSR markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 29:252–264. 10.1007/s11105-010-0220-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ter Braak CJF. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis . Ecology 67:1167–1179. 10.2307/1938672 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tester M, Langridge P. 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327:818–822. 10.1126/science.1183700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Uleberg E, Rohloff J, Jaakola L, Trôst K, Junttila O, Häggman H, Martinussen I. 2012. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on yield and chemical composition of Northern and Southern clones of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 60:10406–10414. 10.1021/jf302924m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao D, Yang J, Yang S, Kato K, Luo J. 2014. Genetic diversity and domestication origin of tea plant Camellia taliensis (Theaceae) as revealed by microsatellite markers. BMC Plant Biology 14:14 10.1186/1471-2229-14-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AoB Plants are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES